Item #5 ppt 228 castano
-
Upload
marian-vargas-mendoza -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
33 -
download
1
Transcript of Item #5 ppt 228 castano
![Page 1: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Case # 631FSignificance & Compatibility
Review228 Castano
Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director
City Council MeetingAgenda Item # 5
July 25, 2016
![Page 2: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
CASE # 631F - SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish
100% of the existing main structure inorder to construct a new single familyresidence with detached accessorystructure.
![Page 3: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
BACKGROUND
Zoned SF-A South side of Castano, between
Nacogdoches Rd. & Alamo Heights Blvd. Significance Review was approved by the
ARB on 12/02/14 and by Council on12/08/14.
![Page 4: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
![Page 5: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 7,514 7,514Main House Footprint 935 2,156Front Porch 108 124Side Porch 1Side Porch 2Rear PorchGarage Footprint 224Carport Footprint 216Shed(s) Footprint 75BreezewaysCovered Patio Structure 178Other Accessory StructuresLot Coverage / Lot Area 1,010 / 7,514 2,898 / 7,514Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 13% 38%
![Page 6: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSEDLot Area 7,514 7,514Main House 1st Floor 935 2,156Main House 2nd Floor 1,002Garage 1st Floor 224Garage 2nd Floor
Other Structures 216FAR / Lot Area 935 / 7,514 3,598 / 7,514
Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 12% 47%
![Page 7: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
POLICY ANALYSIS
2% bonus added to the F.A.R. for a onestory accessory structure (garage).
27’-11 ¼” in height (max allowed 33’). Complies with all regulations concerning
setbacks, height, and loomingstandards.
![Page 8: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
POLICY ANALYSIS
Building Materials Stucco Stone Veneer Composition Shingle Roof
![Page 9: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
POLICY ANALYSIS Heritage Tree Removal (54 total inches)
(1) 26” Oak (1) 28” Oak
Other Tree Removal (38 total inches) (2) 17” Oak (3) 21” Oak
![Page 10: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
POLICY ANALYSIS Tree Mitigation (54 total inches)
(1) 26” Oak (1) 28” Oak
Fees In Lieu $4,000.00 Max $2,000 per tree
![Page 11: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
POLICY ANALYSIS The existing 935 sq. ft. home was built in
1910. (Significance Review) No evidence that
the home was: built by a noted architect belongs to a distinct architectural style or has any major historical significance
![Page 12: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
EXISTING SITE PLAN
![Page 13: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
EXISTING STRUCTURE
![Page 14: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
EXISTING STRUCTURE
![Page 15: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
![Page 16: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
FRONT ELEVATION
![Page 17: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
REAR ELEVATION
![Page 18: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
![Page 19: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
![Page 20: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
STREETSCAPE
![Page 21: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
ARB RECOMMENDATION
ARB Review – June 21, 2016
No significance in existing structure
Replacement structure is compatible
Approved with recommendations
![Page 22: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
ARB RECOMMENDATIONS
Try to fit additional oak trees on the site instead of “Fees in lieu of mitigation”.
Two additional large trees (non-heritage) would need to be removed from the front yard.
![Page 23: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
ARB RECOMMENDATIONS
Red = Heritage Tree RemovalOrange = Other Oaks to be removed.
![Page 24: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
ARB RECOMMENDATIONS
![Page 25: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty
Responses received:
Support: (2)
Oppose: (1)
![Page 26: Item #5 ppt 228 castano](https://reader031.fdocuments.net/reader031/viewer/2022030401/58e66cb31a28ab2a298b48f5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
QUESTIONS?