6:00 p.m. 1. Closed Session Certification - 2.2-3711.A.1.3.5.7
ITE Inc. April 12, 2007 1507A N. Colonial Terrace Arlington, VA 22209 703-528-3711 ITEinc.US
description
Transcript of ITE Inc. April 12, 2007 1507A N. Colonial Terrace Arlington, VA 22209 703-528-3711 ITEinc.US
www.ITEinc.US
1
Design Tools to Support NAVSEA Ship Design & Program Management
&NAVSEA - CNET
HSI for Training Systems
ITE Inc.April 12, 2007
1507A N. Colonial TerraceArlington, VA 22209
703-528-3711www.ITEinc.US
References:
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US
www.ITEinc.US
2
Agenda
1. Purpose
2. History of NAVSEA Physics Based Design (PBD) Tools
3. CAD-Physics History: • Integration• Design Applications• HSI Applications
4. Crafting a Design Environment to supportSECNAV, NAVSEA & CNET Objectives
5. Capture all validated models for HSI reuse
6. Way Ahead
www.ITEinc.US
3
1. Purpose
www.ITEinc.US
4
Purpose
• To share ITE 8 year history of working with NAVSEA to develop:– Physics Based Design Tools– Integration of Physics Tools with 2D-3D CAD Tools– Reuse of validated physics model to support HSI– ICAS support– DDG-1000 Design Tools
• Support NAVSEA objectives for managing ship design: use concurrent V&V– Support DoD – SECNAV Policy: Simulation Based Acquisition
• Discuss successful, practical examples of concurrent V&V of design using “physics” modeling and reuse of captured models for HSI objectives for NAVSEA & CNET:
– Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC & Total Ship Training (BFTT)– Real-time Readiness Assessment ship systems (ICAS)– Engineering & DC Operational Decision Aids– Distance Support– Future Ship Modernization
• Support Next Generation Integrated Power Systems (NGIPS) design architectures and supporting design tools
• Reduce RISK to Performance, Cost and Schedule
www.ITEinc.US
5
2. History of NAVSEA Physics Based Design (PBD) Tools
www.ITEinc.US
6
Simsmart “Physics” analysis was competitively selected by NAVSEA in 1996 is a multi-discipline Physics Based Design (PBD) tool for HM&E process and control systems:• Liquids
• Gases
• HVAC
• AC/DC electrical generation and distribution
• Logic and analog machinery control systems
• Propulsion
www.ITEinc.US
7
To create SIMSMART™ flow sheets To create SIMSMART™ flow sheets just drag & drop the desired equipment andjust drag & drop the desired equipment andcontrol icons on the screen from selectedcontrol icons on the screen from selectedmodel libraries, link them and entermodel libraries, link them and entertheir characteristicstheir characteristics
Simsmart™ Physics Tool OverviewSimsmart™ Physics Tool Overview
www.ITEinc.US 8
Physics Modeling … “Does it work?”
Run-TimeData Trend ...
CAD (Computer Aided Drafting) … “Does it fit?”
HMI
The
Tools
SIMSMART™
Performance Metrics
www.ITEinc.US
9
Ship Modernization / HSI: Open the ModelCreate & Validate the New Design HSI App.
Integrated Product Data Environment (IPDE
www.ITEinc.US
10
Typical Simsmart™ IV&V Applications
•LPD17 - Machinery seawater cooling, firemain, ballast/de-ballast, air de-ballast hydraulics, chill water system, fuel fill and transfer, MOGAS, nitrogen inerting, ballast tank internals
•DD21 Alliance (DD21/DDX/DDG1000 - HM&E and DC systems design V&V
•CG47 Upgrade – AAW Warfare Commander Alt: Chilled water system, firemain, electrical generation and distribution
•LHA 1 Class - Firemain flow network analyses & life cycle studies
•BFTT - Battle Force Tactical Training System: Total Ship Training System
•LSD41 Class - Seawater cooling system design & life cycle studies
•CVN68 Class - Firemain, JP5 fuel handling system, collecting holding & transfer (CHT); System concept, trade-off studies and system operation
•T-AKR Class - De-watering system troubleshooting, cargo storage area HVAC system troubleshooting
•Navy Post Graduate School Ship Progressive Flooding Analysis
•Non-oily waste membrane treatment - Concept design studies, design impacts & operator training
•DDG51 – De-watering, Firemain …
•Arsenal Ship R&D - Firemain, ballast/de-ballast
•LHD8 and more …
LPD
DDG
CVN
LSD
T-AKR
LHA
CG
DDG1000
www.ITEinc.US
11Modeling Domains should be Complementary throughout the Design & Life Cycle Support Process
Domain of Single Discipline Component to System Design
Domain of Multi-discipline Real-time, Component, System and Total Ship Modeling For Concurrent Engineering Analysis, Verification, Performance
Monitoring & HSICharacteristics (Typical):
•Models essentially custom built
•Modeling SW does not come with Navy HM&E models
•Usually non-real time
•Usually single discipline: Electrical or Fluid or HVAC or Gas or …
•Used for: sizing, transient / fault analysis, protective device settings …
•Used for R&D, EDM development, Analysis
•In general, do not interface to ship production CAD - CAM process (see notes)
Saber™
MATLAB™
EDSA™ 1
Mentor Graphics™
FLOWMASTER™
SIMSMART™ 2
Multi-DisciplineTotal Ship Model
Smart ProductModel
(CPC Based)
(PBD - CADBy ship / class)
Ship Design / Production &Lifecycle Support
NAVSEA CPC Based Libraries & Multi-discipline for Total Ship Modeling:
•Electrical
•Fluid
•Gas
•HVAC
•Controls
Transition to Smart Product Model /
Total Ship Model when
Design Verified byEngineering Analysis,
PE Certified& Defined in CPC Format
Part Numbers for Acquisition
Operating Doctrine / Human-in-Loop Performance Models
•EOSS
•EOCC
•CSOSS
•Human Task-Skill Actions: Time and Event based
HSI Support
•Virtual Ship Model
•Embedded Training
•Manpower – Automation Analysis
•Plant Performance Monitoring, Distance Support
•Operational Decision Aids
Ship / Class 2D/3DCAD-Physics Dynamic V&V
Real-Time, Multi-discipline, Cascading Effects of HM&E operations & damage
EASYPOWER™ACSL™
Physics Based Ship Engineering Design Analysis, V&V & HSI Tools
VTB
1.EDSA is associated with CATIA for electrical design
2. SIMSMART supports systems engineering as well as total ship models using CPC parts with electronic data exchange with shipyard CAD-CAM systems.
SPICE™EASY5™
RTDS™
ROSE™CPC Compliant
Components
PSCAD™
SIMSMART™ 2
meets ALL Multi-DisciplineRequirements
www.ITEinc.US
12
From NAVSEA highlights:
“SIMSMART Inc. has successfully modeled 8 piping systems for Avondale.
These models have revealed system deficiencies which may not have been
noticed using traditional flow network calculations (spreadsheets). They
have also made obvious several system enhancements that save money and
production time while still meeting the requirements of the contract. For
example, the chilled water model was used to show that a portion of the main
had to be increased in size from 5 to 6 inches due to the unanticipated
demand that developed in this area of the ship through the detail design
process. Without this modeling capability it is entirely possible that this
shortfall in the system may have gone unnoticed until such time where fitting
the larger main into the overhead would have been impossible. This is just
one example where this exceptional tool has more than paid for itself.”
Daniel S. Van VoorhisUS Navy - LPD 17 Machinery IPTDated ~ Oct 2001
www.ITEinc.US
13
3. CAD-Physics Development History: a. Integration Sponsors:
* DDG-1000* NSRP
b. Design Applicationsc. HSI Applications
www.ITEinc.US
14
CNET : Task Force Excelhttp://www.uscg.mil/TCYORKTOWN/PTC/downloads/TFE.ppt
Had tasked Staff in 2000 to Report status / requirements for CNSF training See CNSF PPT Jan 2002
Engineers at Ingalls scope CAD & dynamic Design Validation using physics models
Design Tools to Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems IntegrationDesign Tools to Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems Integration Rev 5Rev 5
Compiled by ITE Inc 2007 www.ITEinc.US (print 11 x 17 or larger)Compiled by ITE Inc 2007 www.ITEinc.US (print 11 x 17 or larger)
Navy Training Requirements
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 20051999
SBIR Ph 2 Ends
PMS 430 BFTT Observes SIMSMART™ Physics Ship Model at SNAME
2006
LPD 17 is Navy’s First attempt at full digital design incorporating CAD and Physics Dynamic Validation, Selects SIMSMART™ via competition
2007
Draft DOP and ROI provided for CNSF
ExecutiveSummary
CNO ADM Clark ordered Executive Review Navy Training (ERNT)
CNET: 5 Vector Model / Career Training &Education from Ship Acquisitionthru Ship Lifecycle
430 Has BFTT CS SIM-STIM;
Needs HM&E & DC SIM-STIM 1st Demo/Model delivered Notional CG
I/ITSEC 2001 International BFTT Demo Tactical & Eng, DC via WAN U.S. U.K.-Aus.-Netherlands.
New NAVSEA VADM Balisle
Re-org NAVSEA IWS-1E Rick
Bragg. All new contracts.
Staff change over.
DSR SBIR Contract Mod to add Simsmart HM&E-DC model
Model of notional “CG”
DSR / Simsmart
/ OAK contracts end
Raytheon Phase 4 of DD(X)
HM&E dynamic design validation tools acquired by BIW & Ingalls for Modeling DD21 (DDX);by Avondale for PD17; by Ingalls for CG47 Mod; Gibbs & Cox, JJMA and NAVSEA etc.
I/ITSEC 2000, see DCAMS at BFTT booth, Recommend join SBIR
First Real Time cascading casualties for damage and HM&E / repair tied to BFTT CS, using EOSS / EOCC / CSOSS
CNSF VADM Tim LaFleur observesBFTT / Simsmart Demo @ SNA 2002
SNA 2002
Mar 2002:Directed Demo for
VADM LaFleur & Staff @ SD
@ SBIR 2002 CNSF: Can you provide CD for “A” School Sailors per ERNT? Yes.
CoC CNSF RADM Terry
Etnyre
3/05 GAO Report 05-183: findings include … ship design incomplete before production causing cost over run & deficient systems. Also see INSURV MSG: PREINSURV Norfolk VA 181811Z July 05 LPD-17 Incomplete …
DD(X) beginsBIW/ Ingalls Together = DD21 Alliance Both select Simsmart via Competition
Ingalls sells idea to DD21 Alliance & Navy
DD21 Dies
NGSS wins DDX
Protest
NGSS wins again, as Design Agent
Katrina Flood Damage
NAVSEA National Shipbuilding Research Program (NSRP), Increase US - international Competitive Capability with an Advanced Shipbuilding Enterprise (ASE) & Processes
NSRP $$ to Simsmart to integrate with CATIA CAD for Dynamic Validation
NSRP $$ to Simsmart
to integrate with AutoCAD (Ship Constructor) for Dynamic Validation
NSRP $$ to Simsmart to integrate with Intergraph CAD for Dynamic Validation
OAK e-DCAMS OAK DCTMS
VADM Lee Gunn ReportRevolution in Training w/To build careers / useMulti-Level Metrics …
BTSWG Mtgs
OAK added to SBIR
Ingalls FSO CG 47 Mod dynamic design Validation / Model:•Electrical Plant 13K Objects•Firemain 4K Objects•Chill Water 4K Objects
TSTC ICD Drafted … Effort stopped with NAVSEA Reorg.
SBIR Phase 2 BFTT CS / HM&E and DC Model demonstrated
Ship Models for Training from Ship Design Validation Tools
DD21 Program CATIA CAD + Simsmart Physics for Design Validation
DCAMS NAVSEA O5L4 Program Objective Memorandum (POM) 5 years System of Record: Budget line
LCS Ships (did not use dynamic design validation = no model)
DDG1000 Simsmart Physics to CATIA V5 Revs 15, 16, 17 … continues
DDG1000 Simsmart Physics to CATIA V5 Revs 15, 16, 17 … continues
DDX Starts
DD(X) obtains CATIA- SIMSMART™ integration in Dec 04 for Dynamic Validation of Fluid and HVAC (Electrical TBD)
Replace Dongle license plugs for SIMSMART™
DDX Dynamic Validation and Integration to Continue
LPD17: 11 Vital Fluid systems validated with models for NAVSEA. HVAC & Electrical not validated
2003 ASNE Tech Paper: “Achieve HSI through Design”
2003 ASNE Tech Paper: “Achieve HSI through Design”
LHD-8 Modeling for SEA-05D . CSC
LHD-8 Modeling for SEA-05D . CSC
2004 I/TSEC Tech Paper “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve HSI”
2004 I/TSEC Tech Paper “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve HSI”
Premise: Use ship design tools to support ship design / program managers during all phases of design, trials and tests, permitting IV&V monitoring the designs and HSI objectives in progress, linked to corresponding CAD drawings. Physics – math models (basis of design), now “lost”, are captured for reuse for: Distance Support, Performance Monitoring, Readiness Assessment, Operational Decision Aids for DC and Engineering, and future ShipAlt planning. Also support advanced dynamic interactive training ashore and afloat, as well as to provide the underlying computations to teach students how and why systems work – prepare them for critical thinking, college work, etc.
NAVSESS $$ HPAC Model
for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and
OBT
NAVSESS $$ HPAC Model
for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and
OBT
2005 – 2007 ANZAC Frigate Total Ship HME&DC Model
2005 – 2007 ANZAC Frigate Total Ship HME&DC Model
IWS-1E BFTT?
Capt Shannon Joe Loudon
NAVSESS $$ AC Unit Model
for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and
OBT
NAVSESS $$ AC Unit Model
for ICAS Virtual “Hot Plant” and
OBT
www.ITEinc.US
15
4. Crafting a Design Environment to supportSECNAV / NAVSEA / CNET Objectives
www.ITEinc.US
16
SD/PM’s IV&V Virtual Ship Model
Design Continuum Overview
*PBD = Physics Based Design
RequirementsRequirementsContinuous CAD = Does it “Fit”?Continuous CAD = Does it “Fit”?
Continuous PBD* = Does it “Work”?Continuous PBD* = Does it “Work”?
RDT&E - Conceptual
Design
RDT&E - Conceptual
Design
PreliminaryDesign
PreliminaryDesign
ContractDesign
ContractDesign
DetailDesign
DetailDesign
ConstructionConstruction
Future Modernization
Future Modernization
Tests & Trials - Commissioning
Tests & Trials - Commissioning
Ship OperatesShip Operates
Ship Design / Program Manger’s IV&V Rolling Total Ship Performance Verification (Quarterly?)
Quarterly IV&V Performance Verification
Question? When in the Ship Design Process should the electric plant “see” the H&M plant? Why not from day one?
www.ITEinc.US
17
Improve Efficiency of Program Management and Human Systems IntegrationTransformational Ship Design Process – Improve & Control Design – Support the Lifecycle
Common Parts
Integrated Ship Design Tools Spiral Design
SpiralDesign
Process IV&V• Conceptual• Preliminary
• Contract• Detail
Objectives:•Program Control
•PerformanceAssessment•Automation
•Reduced Crew•Survivability
•Safety
•Delivera Full Ship
PBD Modelto support
Tests &Trials
T&Tusing the
PBD model“VirtualShip”
Before &DuringDockTrials
All Systems,
Separately&
Together
• Electrical• Fluid• Gas
• HVAC• Controls
T&Tof the
“ActualShip”
Before &DuringSea
TrialsAll
Systems,Separately
&Together
• Electrical• Fluid• Gas
• HVAC• Controls
Tests & Trials
•The Ship
• Real-timeValidatedDynamic
Modelof theShip
•CADDrawings
• Update allconfiguration
partnumbers
to theERP – TDKM
IPDEPrograms
Deliver
Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC
& Total ShipTraining
(BFTT)
•Real-timeReadiness
Assessmentship systems
(ICAS)
• Engineering &DC Operational
DecisionAids
• DistanceSupport
•Future ShipModernization
HSI Lifecycle
PBD = Design
‘WORKS”
CAD = Design “FITS”
LEAPS
Smart Product Modelw/Multi-Discipline Models
Integrated w/ CAD
Integrated
ITE Inc. 1507A N Colonial Terrace, Arlington,. VA 22209 * [email protected] * www.ITEinc.US
View Companion Technical Paper @
http://www.businessdevelopmentusa.com/docs/HSISymTSDCJune2003.pdf
View Companion Technical Paper @
http://www.businessdevelopmentusa.com/docs/HSISymTSDCJune2003.pdf
www.ITEinc.US
18
Periodic Dynamic V&V Design Review Process
Smart Product ModelIntegrated CAD - Physics
HM&E Component and Systems Designers – P&IDs …
CAD:
It Fits
Physics:
It Works, in real-time Total Ship
Model
CAD & Physics by
Deck
Periodic Dynamic V&V Performance Reviews System and Total Ship Every
Phase / Step of Design
NAVSEA Technical
PEO ShipsWill ship’s HM&E plant support ship & all
missions / modules dynamically thru all
scenarios?
Shipbuilder
All Systems Work Together
LEAPSTeamCenterEnvironment
Electrical Fluid HVACGas Controls DC
www.ITEinc.US
19
ANZAC TPTS Propulsion Systems
www.ITEinc.US
20
Summary: Applications of Multi-Discipline Physics-based Design Tools
• SECNAV – NAVSEA Shipbuilding Objectives:
• Demonstrate dynamic “performance” during RDT&E and all design phases– System to total ship level
• Demonstrate Mission and HSI Performance Requirements• Eliminate Risk• Reduce Costs• Model can be used as the specification• Model can be re-used for all HSI Lifecycle Support Applications
• Mature tools: 19 year development to TLR-9• 19 years Support to NAVSEA, Shipbuilders and Marine Engineering Companies
– Numerous ship design programs (see slide)• Integration of CAD-Physics under NSRP - ASE Phase II:
– CATIA, ShipConstructor, Intergraph• Demonstrated HSI Applications needed by CNET:
– SBIR Total Ship Model for Training (BFTT CS with HME&DC model » real time cascading damage and recovery
• Captures all physics models (basis of design) as well as the CAD• Currently Builder delivers only drawings, none of the “math” (intellectual property)
• ASNE-SNAME technical papers 2003-4: continuous IV&V• Recommended all designs use continuous IV&V (Highlighted LCS program)• Resulting Validated Ship Model Supports the Full Ship Lifecycle• Training• Decision Aids• Modernization• Distance Support / SORTS
www.ITEinc.US
21
5. Example of applying validated models:
BFTT embedded training system SBIR
www.ITEinc.US
22
TRL-8 and 9 Applications Physics Based Design to Human Systems Integration
• For NAVSEA and CNET: Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC & Total Ship Training, Accession to BFTT
• Real-time Readiness Assessment of ship systems in support of ICAS
• Engineering & DC Operational Decision Aids
• Distance Support
• Future Ship Modernization
www.ITEinc.US
23
Imperative Requirement for Validated HM&E Models
Summarize CNET Memo 1 Feb 07
Imperative Need for Electronic Classrooms & Transportable training media CDROMS for fleet Accession and Embedded
Training
The Navy cut instructors betting on low cost PC simulation [like they saw, in part, @ HM&E SS demos in 2001 – 2002
(next 4 slides)]
But NAVSEA reorganized in 2003, VADM LaFleur the champion retired and the initiative died. Next few slides are what VADM LaFleur requested, saw and wanted …all of the necessary models would be a nearly “free” by product of a
Navy ship design process based on continuous IV&V modeling for program management / managing the design
www.ITEinc.US
24
PMS430 – BFTT - Total Ship Training & Operational Decision Aids Architecture
BOPCScenario Generation
& Control
IT21 LAN / SWAN
TPTSPlatform Simulation
Ship Interior Communications
TraineeTrainee
DebriefProducts
Central Control Station (CCS), Damage Control Central (DCC),Machinery Spaces, Repair Stations 2, 3, 5, 8, …
TraineeTrainee
Perceived Truth
Perceived Truth
IT21 SWAN & 2-Way Wireless LAN
Performance
Monitoring,
Training &
Assessment
GROUND TRUTH
Two-way
STOW LANDATA
COLLECTION LAN
PERCIEVED TRUTH
TrainerTrainer
TrainerTrainer
Ground Truth
Training Flags
DCAMS
MCSWearable Computers
USN & Coalition Combat Systems Training
www.ITEinc.US
25
TPTS Instructor Station (1)
www.ITEinc.US
26
Total Ship Training (TST) Integrated Continuum
BFTT TSTS
EngineeringDamage Control
Validated HMEC&DC Ship Systems Dynamic Models Created During Ship Design or From Ship Design Data for Legacy Ships
Benefits:
• Full Fidelity at-Sea Individual and Team Training• “Training more relevant and more motivating at sea” (SNA 2002)
• Fills SWOS “Need for Engineering & Damage Control Training at Sea” (SNA 2002)
• Based on Ship’s EOSS-EOP-EOCC-CSOSS
• Supports CDROM-based Individual Self Paced Training
• Supports SWOS / A-School Classroom Training
Same Models
“Scaled”
Same HMI “Look & Feel”
At Every Level of Training
www.ITEinc.US
27
Application Across Training Continuum(Revolution in Training and Task Force Excel Concept)
Accession Training
Enroute Training
Initial Qualification Refresher Training
CD-ROM with Dynamic Engineering ModelsTailored to assigned ship
- Actual system configurations- Actual EOSS, EOCC, EOP, CSOSS, etc.
Contains: Computer Based Training Lessons
- Cognitive Learning Principles Incorporated Simulation Based Training Scenarios
-Simulation Engine for interactive training
Performance and Debrief Products- Can be printed out or downloaded to floppy- Performance history, test scores, module completion status, etc. downloaded to floppy and imported into training database on arrival at ship
LAN Based Training- Uses same models as CD-ROM and Total Ship Training System- Updates training database- Provides performance and debrief products
Total Ship Training System
www.ITEinc.US
28
Meeting Six Star Requirements for Design, Performance & Training
Legacy Ships and Future Ships
NAVSEA Design & HSI
•Control Design, Performance Cost and Schedule
•Reduce Incidents: Improve Training, Performance, Maintenance & Distance Support (See COMNAVSEA Guidance April 2007)
CNET / NAVPERS Manning & Training
•Instructor manning in decline
•Imperative need for low cost PC Based Accession, In Route & Embedded Training (See CNET Memo Feb 2007)
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US
One Process Both Apps
TSDC Design & HSI Process
www.ITEinc.US
29
One Design-HSI Process Supports NAVSEA & CNET Requirements
Legacy Ships and Future Ships
NAVSEA Design & HSI Achieves:
• Improved Control of Design, Performance, Cost and Schedule; Tools to Reduce & Respond to Incidents: Training, Performance, Maintenance & Distance Support
CNET / NAVPERS Provided at little cost:
• Validated Dynamic HME&DC models for Eng Plant Operator Course low cost PC-Based Accession, In Route & Embedded Training.
Common Parts
Integrated Ship Design Tools Spiral Design
SpiralDesign
Process IV&V• Conceptual• Preliminary
• Contract• Detail
Objectives:•Program Control
•PerformanceAssessment•Automation
•Reduced Crew•Survivability
•Safety
•Delivera Full Ship
PBD Modelto support
Tests &Trials
T&Tusing the
PBD model“VirtualShip”
Before &DuringDockTrials
All Systems,
Separately&
Together
• Electrical• Fluid• Gas
• HVAC• Controls
T&Tof the
“ActualShip”
Before &DuringSea
TrialsAll
Systems,Separately
&Together
• Electrical• Fluid• Gas
• HVAC• Controls
Tests & Trials
•The Ship
• Real-timeValidatedDynamic
Modelof theShip
•CADDrawings
• Update allconfiguration
partnumbers
to theERP – TDKM
IPDEPrograms
Deliver
Shore & Afloat Dynamic Eng / DC
& Total ShipTraining
(BFTT)
•Real-timeReadiness
Assessmentship systems
(ICAS)
• Engineering &DC Operational
DecisionAids
• DistanceSupport
•Future ShipModernization
HSI Lifecycle
PBD = Design
‘WORKS”
CAD = Design “FITS”
LEAPS
Smart Product Modelw/Multi-Discipline Models
Integrated w/ CAD
Integrated
www.ITEinc.US
30
Support SECNAV/ NAVSEA / CNET
Transformation & Sea Enterprise … Business Efficiency (Dynamic IV&V based Metrics) …
… based on Visible, Integrated, Spiral Design Processes
Reduce risk and cost in shipbuildingSupport in Sea Enterprise savings
Support HSI across all phases of the ship lifecycleCollect all Navy Intellectual Property not just drawings
NAVSEA developed these tool sets over 8 yearsReturn on Investment has been shown
Tools are TLR 8 & 9
Way Ahead?
ITE Inc.1507A N. Colonial
Terrace
Arlington, VA 22209
703-528-3711
References:
ASNE Technical Paper, “Achieving Human Systems Integration through Design,” June 2003
I/ITSEC Technical Paper, “A Total Ship – Crew Model to Achieve Human Systems Integration,” December 2004
Available on ITE Website at www.ITEinc.US
www.ITEinc.US
31
Mission Effectiveness by Developing & Re-Applying Validated Simulation Models
Integrated Design•Doctrine•Ship Design•Automation Design•Simulation Based Total Ship-Crew Model•Validate Automation - Reduced Manning
Operational, Threat & Damage Adaptive
•Autonomic (M&S Based) Reconfiguration•Intelligent Agents•Autonomic Response
Security•Access Points•Remote Monitoring
Core Model & Simulation
Embedded M&S Based Training / Decision Aids•Networked BG to Shore•Individual to Total Crew•Sailor accession training
Simulation Based Acquisition & Operation
•Integrated CAD-Physics Smart Product Model through all design phases, with dock & sea trial model validation, reuse of the validated model that will run in parallel during operations, supporting decision aids, ship wide performance monitoring to support all functions on this slide and future Alts & modernization
Mission Readiness•Local & Network within ship & across Battle Force platforms•Combat Systems•Engineering Systems•Damage Control•Distant Support•EHM & CBM•Electronic Manuals•3D Visualization•Crew Location / Monitoring
Damage Control•Autonomic•Intelligent Agent SW•M&S Based Reconfiguration•Personal On-The Move Displays•Combat Systems•Engineering Systems•Damage Control•Electronic Manuals•3D Visualization
Integrated & Distributed Command Capabilities
•Combat & Engineering Systems•Personal On-Move PDA Communications & Control •Electronic Navigation / M&S Based Decision Aids
www.ITEinc.US
32
Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Definitions
Technology Readiness Level Description
1. Basic Principles observed and reported.
Lowest Level of Technology Readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties.
2. Technology concept and/or application formulated.
Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there is no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are limited to analytic studies.
3. Analytical and experimental critical functions and/or characteristic proof of concept.
Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative.
4. Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment.
Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together. This is relatively “low fidelity” compared to the eventual system. Examples include integration of “ad hoc” hardware in laboratory.
5. Component and/or breadboard validation in relevant environment.
Fidelity of breadboard technology increases significantly. The basic technological components are integrated with reasonably realistic supporting elements so that it can be tested in a simulated environment. Examples include “high fidelity” laboratory integration of components.
6. System/subsystem model or prototype demonstration in a relevant environment.
Representative model or prototype system, which is well beyond TRL 5, is tested in a relevant environment. Represents a major step up in technology’s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing a prototype in a high fidelity laboratory environment, or in a simulated operational environment.
7. System prototype demonstration in an operational environment.
Prototype near, or at, planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment, such as an aircraft, vehicle, or space. Examples include testing the prototype in a test bed aircraft.
8. Actual system completed and “flight qualified” through test and demonstration.
Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, TRL represents the end of the true system development. Examples include developmental test and evaluation of the system in its intended weapon system to determine if it meets design specifications.
9. Actual system “flight proven” through successful mission operations.
Actual Application of the technology in its final form and under mission conditions, such as those encountered in operational test and evaluation. In almost all cases, this is the end of the last “bug fixing” aspects of system development. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions.