IT-ITeS Sector Skills Council · PDF filePowered by: IT-ITeS Sector Skills Council Foundation...
Transcript of IT-ITeS Sector Skills Council · PDF filePowered by: IT-ITeS Sector Skills Council Foundation...
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
IT-ITeS Sector Skills Council
Foundation Skills in Integrated Product Development (FSIPD)
Guideline Document for the Facilitator
in the Outcomes Based Format (OBF)
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
<Inside page>
Every effort has been made to trace the owners of copyright material included in this document. NASSCOM® would be grateful for any omissions brought to their notice for acknowledgement in future editions of the book.
© First published in 2012 All rights are reserved. No part of this document or any related material provided may be circulated, quoted, or re-produced for distribution without the prior written approval from NASSCOM.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Acknowledgements NASSCOM would like to place on record it appreciation of its member company TCS who has partnered in this initiative. We would also like to thank iGate and Engineering Proficiency Program (EPP) members, as mentioned in Annexure VI, for supporting this initiative, by structuring and fine-tuning the materials provided. NASSCOM is highly appreciative of its member companies for believing in this initiative under the IT-ITeS Sector Skill Council that aims to increase the industry readiness of the available student pool. This can be achieved by developing and facilitating the implementation of programs of educational relevance with an aim to bridge the perceived industry –academia skill gaps and specific industry related competencies w.r.t. Engineering Services Sector. The industry specific competencies (i.e. skills and knowledge) w.r.t Integrated Product Development (IPD) is aimed at empowering students with entry level Design Engineer related skills. NASSCOM recognizes that this is an initiative of great importance for all the stakeholders concerned; industry, academia, and students. The tremendous work and ceaseless support offered by members of the working group / partnering companies in strategizing and designing the training material for the Foundation Skills in Integrated Product Development (FSIPD) is commendable. NASSCOM would also like to thank the senior leadership of these partner companies for sharing their thoughts and invaluable inputs in the planning and execution of the FSIPD program.
Introduction to the Program The Foundation Skills in Integrated Product Development (FSIPD) program will increase the industry readiness of students who want to start a career in engineering companies in the area of Integrated Product Development. This program has been developed by experts from TCS with inputs from INFOSYS, HCL, WIPRO, EMC, Alcatel Lucent, KPIT and iGate, with a vision to develop the skills of students graduating from colleges, to match the industry requirement. The ’Outcomes Based Format’ (OBF) used to develop this program helps one focus on the key skills required to perform a given job role. The program has two tracks—one that is concentrated on guiding the facilitator and the other for guiding the student.
Objective of the Program The FSIPD program has been developed with the following objectives:
To facilitate the acquisition of the foundation skills in the process, tools and techniques in the Integrated Product Development area of the Engineering Services industry.
To provide the requisite understanding towards application of academic topics from engineering disciplines into real world engineering projects.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
About the Program
To increase the funnel of available quality students 'at entry‘ level, NASSCOM suggests the basic skills / foundation skills program termed as Foundation Skills in Integrated Product Development (FSIPD) to be run as an add-on program in education institutions. One of the purposes of this initiative is that as a way forward universities/colleges would consider making these programs compulsory for students or integrate the development of these competencies into the teaching-learning program by allocating credits to these programs.
Eligibility The program is targeted towards students perusing the pre-final/ final year of graduation or post graduate courses in any of the engineering streams.
Program Duration
The program is expected to be conducted over 50 hours including a blend of guided or instructor-led learning, tutorials, and practical exercises.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Table of Contents—Foundation Skills in Integrated Product Development (FSIPD)
Module: Fundamentals of Product Development 1.1 Unit: Global Trends Analysis and Product decision [5.5 Hrs]
1.1.1 Session: Types of various trends affecting product decision - Social Trends (Demographic, Behavioral, Psychographic), Technical Trends(Technology, Applications, Tools, Methods ), Economical Trends(Market, Economy, GDP, Income Levels, Spending Pattern, target cost, TCO), Environmental Trends(Environmental Regulations and Compliance), Political/Policy Trends(Regulations, Political Scenario, IP Trends and Company Policies)
1.1.2 Session: PESTLE Analysis 1.2 Unit: Introduction to Product Development Methodologies and Management [4.5 Hrs]
1.2.1 Session: Overview of Products and Services (Consumer product, Industrial product, Specialty products etc.,) 1.2.2 Session: Types of Product Development (NPD/ Re-Engineering (Enhancements, Cost Improvements)/ Reverse
Engineering/ Design Porting & Homologation) 1.2.3 Session: Overview of Product Development methodologies (Over the Wall/ Waterfall/ V-Model/ Stage-Gate Process/
Spiral/Systems Engineering/ Agile)
1.2.4 Session: Product Life Cycle (S-Curve, Reverse Bathtub Curve)
1.2.5 Session: Product Development Planning and Management (Budgeting, Risk, Resources and Design Collaboration, Scheduling, Change Management, Product Cost Management)
Module: Requirements and System Design 2.1 Unit: Requirement Engineering [5.0 Hrs]
2.1.1 Session: Types of Requirements (Functional, Performance, Physical, Regulatory, Economical, Behavioral, Technical, Stakeholder, Environmental, Industry specific, Internal-Company Specific)
2.1.2 Session: Requirement Engineering (Gathering (VOC), Analysis (QFD), Design Specification)
2.1.3 Session: Traceability Matrix and Analysis
2.1.4 Session: Requirement Management
2.2 Unit: System Design & Modeling [5.0 Hrs]
2.2.1 Session: Introduction to System Modeling
2.2.2 Session: System Optimization
2.2.3 Session: System Specification
2.2.4 Session: Sub-System Design
2.2.5 Session: Interface Design
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Module: Design and Testing 3.1 Unit: Conceptualization [5.0 Hrs]
3.1.1 Session: Industrial Design and User Interface Design
3.1.2 Session: Introduction to Concept generation Techniques
3.1.3 Session: Concept Screening & Evaluation
Concept Design
S/W Architecture
Hardware Schematics and simulation
3.2 Unit: Detailed Design [5.0 Hrs]
3.2.1 Session: Component Design and Verification
3.2.2 Session: High Level Design/Low Level Design of S/W Programs, S/W Testing
3.2.3 Session: Hardware Schematic, Component design, Layout and Hardware Testing
3.3 Unit: Prototyping [4.0 Hrs]
3.3.1 Session: Types of Prototypes (Mockups, Engineering Assessment Prototype, Alpha, Beta, Gama)
3.3.2 Session: Introduction to Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Manufacturing
3.4 Unit: System Integration, Testing, Certification and Documentation [4.0 Hrs]
3.4.1 Session: Manufacturing/Purchase and Assembly of Systems
3.4.2 Session: Integration of Mechanical, Embedded and S/W systems
3.4.3 Session: Introduction to Product verification processes and stages – Industry specific (DFMEA, FEA, CFD)
3.4.4 Session: Introduction to Product validation processes and stages - Industry specific (Sub-system Testing/ Integration Testing/ Functional Testing/ Performance Testing / Compliance Testing)
3.4.5 Session: Product Testing standards and Certification – Industry specific
3.4.6 Session: Product Documentation (Compliance Documentation, Catalogue, Brochures, user manual, maintenance Manual, Spares Parts List, Warranty, Disposal Guide, IETMS, Web Tools)
Module: Sustenance Engineering and End-of-Life (EoL) Support 4.1 Unit: Sustenance [3.5 Hrs]
4.1.1 Session: Maintenance and Repair
4.1.2 Session: Enhancements
4.2 Unit: Product EoL [3.5 Hrs]
4.2.1 Session: Obsolescence Management
4.2.2 Session: Configuration Management
4.2.3 Session: EoL Disposal
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Module: Business Dynamics – Engineering Services Industry 5.1 Unit: The Industry [2.0 Hrs]
5.1.1 Session: Engineering Services Industry – overview
5.1.2 Session: Product development in Industry versus Academia
5.2. Unit: The IPD Essentials [3.0 Hrs]
5.2.1 Session: Introduction to vertical specific product development processes
5.2.2 Session: Product development Trade-offs
5.2.3 Session: Intellectual Property Rights and Confidentiality
5.2.4 Session: Security and configuration management
How to Use this Program?
In order to make the teaching-learning process effective, this program’s curricula design. has been developed based on the OBF.
The curricula framework highlights an integrated output that encompasses the following for the program:
Outcomes
Processes
Inputs
The curricula framework enables every parameter to be detailed to maximize impact and empower the learner with the requisite competencies toward lifelong learning and gainful employment.
For the expected learning outcomes, the facilitator must refer to the FSIPD OBF detailed in the following pages.
The module content identified is followed by a suggested lesson plan.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Engineering and R&D Services: Foundation and Advanced Curriculum Framework
Framework for “Employment” oriented curricula
Outcomes Based Format Curriculum Design
Foundation Skills in
Integrated Product Development (FSIPD)
Curriculum Framework
IT-ITeS Sector Skill Council
An Industry Initiative
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Engineering and R&D Services: Foundation and Advanced Curriculum Framework
The “Curriculum Framework” highlights an integrated output that encompasses “Outcomes”, “Processes” and “Inputs”. The framework will enable stakeholders to develop and customize programs of learning using different media to empower candidates with the desired foundation and advanced skills necessary for entry level employment in the Engineering and R&D Services industry.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
We propose the course assessments, formative and summative, to be based on the learning styles, as explained in the adaptation of the Bloom’s taxonomy. Please refer to the illustration below.
Current Practice % (anecdotal evidence)
Level as per Bloom's Taxonomy
Proposed System % (Subject to module
requirement)
Split of 50 Hrs
80 Remembering 30 15
15 Understanding 20 10
5 Applying 40 20
Analyzing - -
Evaluating - -
Creating - -
Professional skills - -
Business Dynamics 10 5
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Part 1: Outcomes and Processes (are combined in this template)
Part-I: Outcomes
Name of the Program: Foundation Skills in Integrated Product Development (FSIPD) This program can be offered with all Undergraduate or equivalent programs/courses for all engineering streams. This program is also applicable for students in Post Graduate programs who aspire to join the engineering industry at the entry level. The FSIPD program aims to improve student‘s awareness and understanding of the basic concepts involved in Integrated product Development (IPD) by providing exposure to the key product development concepts. Students, who complete this program, will stand a better chance to be considered for jobs in the Engineering industry.
1. Program Outcomes Course Outcomes Duration (Hrs.)
I. Professional Outcomes Details are covered separately in Professional Skills OBF. -
II. Course Outcomes
(Domain: Integrated
Product Development)
After completing this program, the student will be able to obtain the technical skills needed to effectively play the entry level design engineer role in an engineering organization. The student will be able to:
Analyse various global trends and decide on the scope of a new product
Understand various types of products and services
Understand the product development methodologies and management
Develop product management plan for a new product based on the type of the new product and development methodology
Understand requirement engineering and know how to collect, analyze and arrive at requirements for new product development and convert them in to design specification
Understand system modeling for system, sub-system and their interfaces and arrive at the optimum system specification and characteristics
Conceptualize new product integrating the Hardware, software, controls, electronics and mechanical systems
Perform detailed product design
Develop prototype plan and coordinate the respective activities with prototype manufacturing facility
Develop test specifications and coordinate the respective activities with testing group, validate the product and confirm its performance as per design specification.
Develop product documentation as required
45 Hrs
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Perform sustenance engineering and EoL (End of Life) support activities for engineering customer
III. Employability
Outcomes
After completing this program, the student will be able to obtain the employability skills needed to effectively play the entry level design engineer role in an engineering organization. Students will develop skills relevant to:
Product development
Process driven approaches – Industry awareness
Engineering industry
Product life-cycle management
5 Hrs
Total 50 hrs
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Program Outcomes
Student
Learning
Outcomes
Student Learning Objectives
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
Performance Ensuring Measures (PEM) /
Assessments Continuous (C),
Summative (S), Final (F)
Duration
(Hrs.)
Process (How to do)
Professional Skills
Details are covered separately in Professional Skills OBF.
Program Outcomes
Student
Learning
Outcomes
Student Learning Objectives
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
Performance Ensuring Measures (PEM) /
Assessments Continuous (C),
Summative (S), Final (F)
Duration
(Hrs.)
Process (How to do)
Course Outcomes ( Domain Subject )
Knowledge
At the end of the program, the students will be able to:
The student is able to:
List various global trends that influence the IPD project selection and development
Understand various global trends that influence the new product identification process
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
1 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Understand PESTLE analysis
Define PESTLE analysis’ uses in product development
List various factors considered in preparing PESTLE analysis
Understand how different factors apply
Use PESTLE analysis
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
1 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
to different types of organizations
Define product and its types
Understand what a product is and its types.
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
0.5 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Define product development process
List types of product development process
Define product life cycle and explain the types
Describe the product planning process
Describe the product development management process
List the types of product development
List the types of product development process
Identify various elements in the product development plan
Identify the correct Industry domain for the pilot project, NPD Methodology for its development and create the development plan for it
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
1.5 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
List the types of requirements for the new products
Define the requirement engineering
Define the traceability matrix
Describe the
List various types of requirements in the requirement specification
Identify elements of traceability matrix
Understand the requirement
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
2 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
requirement management plan
management plan
Describe system modeling and optimization methods
Define system, sub-system, interface design and specifications
Define terminologies related to system modeling
Know different tools available for system design and simulation, their applicability for a typical situation
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
2 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
List types of concept generation techniques
Describe concept screening methods
Describe the H/W schematics, S/W Architecture and UI design
List and describe concept generation techniques
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
2 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Describe the H/W, S/W and component detailed design
List types of prototypes
Identify the role of rapid prototyping and rapid manufacturing in IPD
Identify the steps involved in detailed design and prototyping
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
3 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Identify the steps involved in system integration
List various types of testing and certifications
Describe product documentations
List the types of testing, certifications
Describe different types of Product documentations
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
1 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Define sustenance engineering and EoL support and the activities involved
Define terminologies in Sustenance and EOL support projects
Presentation and class discussions
Quiz
1 Topic presentation by Faculty, followed by class discussions “Did I get this?” quiz activities
Understanding/Comprehension
At the end of the program, the students will be able to:
Explain the importance of global trends
Explain the process of PESTLE analysis
Explain different types of products
The student is able to:
Describe the need and process for PESTLE analysis
Experiential Learning
Peer Teaching and Class discussions
Quiz
3 6 1
Teams are formed – each team is provided with a physical electromechanical product (such as Remote operated car, videogame etc.,) and the assignment is to explore how the IPD process was applied for the product by teardown and reference to material in net Individual team's learning are peer taught to the entire class
“Did I get this?” activities for assessment (Objective questions based
Explain the product development process , its types and activities covered in the same
Summarize the types of NPD projects
Define product development process and the various elements in it
Explain how various types of requirements are arrived based on VOC data and ensured throughout the product development process with the help of traceability matrix.
Describe the need for requirements document and traceability matrix
Demonstrate the understanding of system modeling, optimization, System specification, Sub-system and interface design activities
Describe the need for system modeling and various elements in it
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Explain the process for generation, screening and evaluation of concepts
Explain the understanding of software architecture and hardware schematics
Describe the concept generation process
on case studies to check the understanding part)
Summarize the activities involved in detailed design and prototyping stages
Describe the detailed design process
Explain the activities involved in system integration, testing, certification and documentations
Explain the need for product testing, its types and role in certification process
Summarize various Sustenance engineering and EOL support activities
Define the terminologies in sustenance engineering and EOL support
Application At the end of the program, the students will be able to:
Prepare PESTLE analysis for a given industry
The student is able to:
Prepare PESTLE Analysis, product development plan, requirements specification, system model, concept design, detailed design, prototype spec, testing specifications and CAD/CAE models based on the respective input
Contest based Project work
14
A scenario for a new product is identified and the teams are asked to develop a new product for the given scenario (starting from market study till launching and sales display – such as the “toy 2.00b” of MIT
Use appropriate product development methodology and prepare product development plan for a given new product
Prepare requirements specification based on the VOC data given for a new product
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Prepare system model choosing appropriate sub-systems and interfaces for a given new product
data provided
Team Presentations
and Class
discussions
5
Toya lab: http://web.mit.edu/2.00b/www/pages/courseinfo.html )
Model building using Lego or similar kits (Link:http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/Archives/JanFeb06/p42-45.pdf) (Time/ resource constraints, customer segments are defined and it is left to the team to effectively use the time and resource to develop a product that fetches maximum sales booking during sales display.) Sales display
contest for the
teams to give
demo
presentation of
their products
Awarding of
Create concept design for a given requirement
Perform detailed design based on a given concept design
Prepare test specifications for a given new product
Prepare product documentation needed for a new product
Use sustenance engineering and EOL support activities
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Assessments (F)
1
winners
Sharing of the
Best practices
and lessons
learnt from the
practice session
with the team
Assessments
giving weightage
for the following
attributes:
- -Theory
questions
- -Class and lab
participations
- -Innovativeness
of Ideas
- -Final models
-Application of
professional/
business skills
Analysis (HOTS) NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE
Evaluation (HOTS)
NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Synthesis(HOTS) NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE
Program Outcomes
Student Learning Outcomes
Student Learning Objectives
Key Performance Indicators (KPI)
Performance Ensuring Measures (PEM)
Duration (Hrs.)
Process (How to do)
Employability Outcomes
Knowledge Understanding/Comprehension
At the end of the program, the students will be able to:
Understand the business scenario in an engineering industry and how it differs from academic scenario
Understand the importance of project life cycle in engineering service industry
Understand the project goals – schedule time, budget and quality compliance
Understand the need to follow processes as defined by the quality system
Understand the concept of
The student is able to:
Explain the activities at the engineering services industry
Practical application of the IPD process in simulated industry set-up
2 E-Learning (Walkthrough of typical project life cycle in engineering service industry and the application of business skills during the project life cycle)
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
functional organisation
Understand the need to collaborate for projects
Recognize the physical and IT Security measures
Define the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Patent filing
Understand work ethics
Define the trade-offs decision in commercial scenario (Cost vs Performance, Verification Vs physical testing, Timely launch Vs Perfecting the product etc.,)
Application At the end of the program, the students will be able to:
Apply the business skills in the engineering services industry
The student is able to:
Apply the activities
at the engineering
services industry
Industry visit 3 In-plant
tours at
engineering
service
industries
Analysis (HOTS) NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE
Evaluation (HOTS) NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE
Synthesis(HOTS) NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE NOT APPLICABLE
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
PART-II Inputs for facilitating and achieving the Outcomes Inputs
Curriculum TOC
Syllabus Fundamentals of Product Development Global Trends Analysis and Product decision Introduction to Product Development Methodologies and Management
Requirements and System Design Requirement Engineering System Design & Modeling
Design and Testing Conceptualization Detailed Design Prototyping System Integration, Testing, Certification and Documentation
Sustenance Engineering and End-of-Life (EoL) Support Sustenance
Product EoL
Business Dynamics – Engineering Services Industry The Industry
The IPD Essentials
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Infrastructure Required
Infrastructure:
i. Classroom layout (classroom diagram )
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Classroom infrastructure & ICT requirement
For TTT/TOT (batch of 25 trainers):
Classroom size—Min. 10 ft. x 15 ft. U-Shaped table with a seating capacity of 25 Computer/Laptop with speakers & CD ROM—1 (for master trainer) Computer lab with 25 Computers (desktop) with following:
CD-ROM MS Office Speakers Headphones with microphone—25 Nos. Internet Connection with 2 Mbps speed
LCD Projector & Screen—1 Whiteboard—1 Flip Charts—5 Post-It Pads in different sizes and colours Sketching Kit (Pencils, eraser, sharpener, stencils, Highlighter, colour pencils, sketches, charts)
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Mockup development articles (cardboard, paper, cloth, scissor, clay, thermocol, toys, Lego Mindstorm kits and others)
Products for experiential learning (Remote operated car, videogame etc.,) For Student Training (batch of 30 candidates):
Classroom size—Min. 10 ft. x 15 ft. Tables/chairs - 30 Computer/Laptop with speakers & CD ROM—1 (for trainer) Computer lab with 25 Computers (desktop) with following:
CD-ROM MS Office Typing Tutor (software) Speakers Headphones with microphone—30 Nos. Internet Connection with 2 Mbps speed
LCD Projector & Screen—1 Whiteboard—1 Flip Charts—5 Post-It Pads in different sizes and colours Sketching Kit (Pencils, eraser, sharpener, stencils, highlighter, colour pencils, sketches, charts) Mock-up development articles (cardboard, paper, cloth, scissor, clay, thermocol, toys, Lego Mindstorm
kits and others) Products for experiential learning (Remote operated car, videogame etc.,)
ii. Labs
Physical Lab for performing model activities with Lego Mindstorm/ similar kits A lab with a computing peripherals The lab should have licensed software available to build and install the operating systems, domains and
email systems, and a facility to record The lab should have internet facility available to students Preferably online classrooms with projector will enhance the learning experience in the classroom White board and marker pens Lab guides will help the students to be on their own while doing hands-on assignments and reduce
intervention from faculty
Virtual
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Faculty and Support Staff
Faculty:
Qualifications
Experience Support staff
Qualifications
Experience
Library Library - Physical and virtual
CBT
WBT
Articles
Books
Internet references
Text books
Practical -Labs infrastructure & ICT requirements
Practical:
Labs - Physical - Virtual
Tutorials
Internship programs
Internship
Company
Simulated in classroom
Lesson Plans Template
Lesson Plans for Delivery (a sample lesson Plan for each is to be prepared) and attaches as annexure Course/program delivery using Blended learning:
Lectures
Role plays
Presentations
Assignments (classrooms and homework)
Discussion forums & Group discussions
Projects Projects:
Lab based
Classroom based
Online projects
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Assessment & Evaluation Practice Details Sample question papers;
Assessments and Evaluation
Continuous
End of Module assessments
End of Course Certification
Certification framework to be worked.
Employment Skill Assessment
Certification framework to be worked.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
ANNEXURE-I
Content Outline Weekly Plan —Guideline document for the Trainer: To be filled in by the trainer while customizing delivery
Course Name: FSIPD Module :
Hours Lesson Plan for each activity in place
Yes / No
Face -to-
Face
Team Work
Individual project/
Internship + Feedback
Practical +
Feedback
Practical+ Feedback
Assessments +Feedback
Continuous Summative
A Fundamentals of Product Development
1 9 19 2
1
B Introduction to Product Development Methodologies and Management
3
C Requirements and System Design
2
D System Design & Modeling
2
E Concept Design 2
F Design and Testing
3
G Sustenance Engineering and EoL Support
1
H Business Dynamics – Engineering Services Industry
2 - 3 -
Total 16 9 22 2 1
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
ANNEXURE-II
Directional Guideline Plan for Modules
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
ANNEXURE-III
A. Lesson Plan Template: *Day-wise Template Note: This table is to be filled by the facilitator for each session based on the schedule and class information.
Course Name FSIPD
Date, Day, Time DD/MM/YYYY, <Day>, HH:MM
Name of Faculty Mr./Ms/ XXX
Name of Company/ College/University
XXX University/ YYY College
Number and Nature of Students
30 students in engineering stream
Base Equipment Overhead Projector/Chart Board/Pens etc) in Class or Conference Room
*Course Lesson Plan templates Course Rationale, Objective & Plan
Course Rationale & Objective:
Course Rationale : The purpose of learning this course on FSIPD, is to improve student‘s awareness and understanding of the basic concepts involved in Integrated Product Development (IPD) by providing exposure to the key product development concepts.
Course Objective: At the end of this module on Fundamentals of IPD, the learner will be able to understand the importance of market forces in determining the product strategy of a business from various categories available.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Session Rationale, Objective & Plan
Session Rationale: The purpose of learning this session on PESTLE Analysis is to learn how to perform PESTLE analysis for a market scenario based on different macro-environmental factors that the company has to take into consideration while deciding its product strategy.
Session Objective: At the end of this Session on PESTLE Analysis, the learner will be able to: perform PESTLE analysis and decide the most competitive
product strategy for a given business.
Session Plan
Time Content Learning Aid /
Methodology
Trainer
Approach
Learner
Activity
Learning Outcome
(Skill, Competency)
9:00 to 9.10 AM
Introduction: How PESTLE analysis
fits in the big picture of IPD process PPT/Lecture Discussion Participation
Acknowledge importance of session.
9.10 to 9.40 AM
PESTLE Analysis – Why, What and
How’s
Covering Terminology, Methodology
overview with example
PPT/Lecture Discussion Participation
Understanding of the terminology and
method for performing PESTLE
analysis
9.40 to 9.50
AM “Did I get it?” self check exercises Web based questions - Participation Verification of the concepts learnt
9.50 to
10.00 AM Conclusion & Summary
Supplementary
information and links
for more information
on PESTLE analysis
Discussion Participation Get a recap of things learnt and links
for further learning
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
ANNEXURE-IV
Assessment Templates: Any further assessments required by the trainer can be developed.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
ANNEXURE-V
Employment Assessment
NASSCOM Assessment of Competence-Tech (NAC-Tech)
About NAC-Tech NAC-Tech has been conceived as an industry standard assessment and certification program to ensure the transformation of a "trainable" workforce into an "employable" workforce, hence creating a robust and continuous pipeline of talent for the IT/engineering industry. It is targeted at final year and pre-final year students, who will be seeking employment opportunities in the IT/engineering sector. Conceptualization of NAC-Tech In-depth meetings with the large recruiters in the industry were conducted to understand their recruitment practices, cause of attrition desired skills in a candidate, etc. Based on this, a job-skill matrix was developed which formed the basis for the design of this assessment program. Core and working committees from the industry were formed and constant interactions were made to make sure that the program was in line with the industry requirements. An evaluation committee was set up to finalize the vendors and decide on the approach to the pilot. Multi-tier evaluation of the vendors happened after the initial interaction. The identified vendors provided the content and technology to run the test. The companies that have helped develop the assessment program are—TCS, Wipro, Infosys, Accenture, Cognizant and HCL. Key Features of NAC-Tech Eligibility for NAC-Tech - Any candidate appearing in “final year” of BE, B. Tech, MCA, M. Sc-IT is eligible to take the test - Preferred scores of candidates: 60% aggregate in graduation, 12th standard & 10th standard Advantages of NAC-Tech for various stakeholders
For Colleges/Universities
Enable the college to generate a quantifiable picture of the knowledge and skill level of its students.
Approach industry aggressively and in a more organized way for placement opportunities.
For Students
Detailed feedback on their knowledge and skills help them decide career opportunities in different areas of IT.
NAC-Tech score card enables them to leap-frog to the next level of selection to multiple companies endorsing the program.
For the Industry
Industry gets a pool of pre-assessed candidates mapped against competencies required for entry level professionals.
It helps them reach out to a wider geography and access talent from level 2 and 3 cities and institutions.
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Test Matrix for NAC-Tech is illustrated below:
Part A (this must be attempted by all candidates)
Skill Competencies Checked Duration (in min)
Mode of delivery
Verbal Ability To assess candidate's verbal building blocks by evaluating skills like grammar, spellings, punctuations, and vocabulary. To assess English usage by evaluating skills like structure, arguments, and verbal reasoning.
20 Online
Reading Comprehension To assess candidate's comprehension of English passages and ability to make inferences from a large amount of information. Be able to connect the dots and make an assessment based on information and ideas spread across the passage.
10 Online
Analytical Reasoning To assess problem-solving skills through questions on quantitative reasoning. To assess candidate's logical skills by evaluating skills like deduction, induction and visualization.
25 Online
Attention to Detail To assess candidates eye for detail. 5 Online
total duration 60
Part B - Optional (can be attempted if the student desires so) (The candidate can choose any one of the domains)
Skill Competencies Checked Duration (in min)
Mode of delivery
IT To assess candidate's technical skills in the core area of education. 30 Online
Electrical -do- 30 Online
Electronics -do- 30 Online
Mechanical -do- 30 Online
Civil -do- 30 Online
Chemical -do- 30 Online
Textile -do- 30 Online
Bio-Technology -do- 30 Online
Telecommunications -do- 30 Online
total duration 30
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
Technical requirements for NAC-Tech
Minimum Configuration for NAC-Tech Tests
Description Client PC (Test Taking PC) (with a Monitor, Mouse, & Keyboard)
Operating System Windows® XP SP3+, or 7
CPU Pentium® IV and higher
RAM 1GB RAM and above
HDD At least 500 MB free disk space
Web browser: Internet Explorer 6.0, 7.0 or 8.0
Broadband Internet connection E1 with a bandwidth of at least 1Mbps or Shared DSL or cable with a bandwidth of at least 2 Mbps for 25–30 users
Sound Card with necessary audio and video drivers
Yes (Should support recording & playback capabilities)—OPTIONAL
Headset with Microphone Headset with a USB headset is strongly recommended -- OPTIONAL
Java Scripts JRE 1.6 (Enabled in the browser)
Adobe Flash Player 10.0 Yes
UPS (assuming that generator will be used during power failure)
2 Hours Battery Backup
Generator (may be used for 8 hours or more if needed)
Yes
CD-ROM Drive OPTIONAL
USB Ports OPTIONAL
Antivirus Yes
Screen resolution 1024 x 768 pixels
Network security access to allow http://202.138.124.234/Nactech2 (port 80)
Disable pop-up blocker on all machines
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
ANNEXURE-VI
Engineering Proficiency Program Members
S. No. Name of the Company Contact Person Email id
1. HCL Manjunatha Hebbar [email protected]
2. HCL Vayu Nandan Kumar [email protected]
3. HCL Ashok G [email protected]
4. TCS S Selvan [email protected]
5. Infosys KNS Acharya [email protected]
6. Infosys Tomy Thomas [email protected]
7. Infotech Enterprises Ramanand pattige [email protected]
8. Defiance KN Varadarajan [email protected]
9. L&T Integrated Engineering Services
Krishnakumar [email protected]
10. iGate Santanu Ray [email protected]
11. iGate Sheela Jain [email protected]
12. iGate Animesh Das [email protected]
13. EMC Veda [email protected]
14. KPIT Cummins Prashant Ghanekar [email protected]
15. KPIT Cummins Renuka Krishna [email protected]
16. Microsoft Phani Kondepudi [email protected]
17. Microsoft Vinay Tamboli [email protected]
18. Wipro Hemachandra Bhat [email protected]
19. Alcatel Lucent Murthy Bhamidi [email protected]
20. Alcatel Lucent RadhaKrishna [email protected]
21. Synapse Naren Nande [email protected] / [email protected]
22. Aricent MC Parameswaran [email protected]
Powered by: <Engineering Talent Council NASSCOM >
23. Mahindra Satyam Srinivas Ramanathan [email protected]
24. UTC Aerospace Systems
Sharatkumar Variyar [email protected]
25. Bosch Ajay Kumar [email protected]
26. Bosch Anju Bhadoria [email protected]
27. Tata Technologies Ravindra Ranade [email protected]
28. Mahindra Engineering Prabu Sunil [email protected]
29. Mahindra Engineering Durgaprasad Shukla [email protected]
30. Airbus Suraj Chettri [email protected]
31. SAP Jai Prakash Nethala [email protected]
32. Intel Apreeta Singh [email protected]
33. SASKEN Vijai Simha [email protected]
34. Huawei Ashok Gopinath [email protected]
***