Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC...

19
Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009 Dongwon Jeong, Doo-Kwon Baik [email protected] , [email protected] Kunsan National University, Korea University WG2 N1353

Transcript of Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC...

Page 1: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification

of Web Ontology (PSO)

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting

London, UK, November 17, 2009

Dongwon Jeong, Doo-Kwon [email protected], [email protected]

Kunsan National University, Korea University

WG2 N1353

Page 2: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Contents

Discussion History Background and Motivation Goal and Purposes Framework Scope Understanding with an Example Issues Future Plan

2Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 3: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Discussion History

The idea of this proposal has been presented in the following meetings

SC32 Joint Study Period, Clearwater, Florida, USA, January 2007

SC 32 Plenary and WG Meetings, New York, USA, May 2007

SC 32/WG 2 Interim, Seoul, Korea, December 2007

SC 32 Plenary and WG Meetings, Australia, May 2008

– Extension of the Study Period and Change of its Direction

SC 32/WG 2: Workshop on ROR-ODMS-SMMP Study Periods, Wuhan, China, November 2008

– WG2 N1177: Extending the Metadata Registry for Semantic Web

SC 32/WG 2 Interim, Portugal, November 2008

– WG2 N1219: Extending the Metadata Registry for Semantic Web: Subtitled “PSO: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology”

3Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 4: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Discussion History (cont.)

The idea of this proposal has been presented in the following meetings

SC 32 Plenary and WG 2 Meetings, Jeju, Korea, June 2009.

– Approved as a subdivision of ISO/IEC 20943 Part 6

– SC32 N1887 JTC1/SC32 Plenary Resolutions, 2009-06-26: 32N1887-SC32_Jeju_plenary_resolutions.pdf

– SC32/WG2 N1283 Presentation on Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology: WG2_N1283_Presentation_EMDR-Korea.ppt

SC 32/WG 2: Wuhan Study Period Meeting on ROR, ODMS, PSO, SQL/MM-8 MDR, Wuhan, China, August 2009.

– SC32/WG2 N1313 : WG2_N1313_WHU_ROS_09_019_MeetingMinutes.pdf

– Discussion on the comments from Canana (SC32/WG2 N1291)

4Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 5: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Background & Motivation

5

MDR(Metadata Registry,

ISO/IEC 11179)

SemanticWeb

SyntacticWeb

Ontology

Contains standardized (common) concepts for various applications fields

Specifying Web ontology using common/standardized concepts in MDR for the Semantic Web

Evolution

Ontology

Ontology

Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 6: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Goal and Purposes

The goal of this proposal is to provide the Specification support of ontology using the concepts in

MDR

The purposes of this proposal are to promote the followings: Faciliation usability of MDR under the Semantic Web environment Building of ontology schema consisting of standardized concepts

– i.e., well-known concepts or generalized concepts, which are accepted by general users as well as domain experts

Easy and clear understanding of concepts across corresponding same or similar application fields

More formalized building of ontology Ease of definition (building) of ontology Enhancement of interoperability between ontologies

6Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 7: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Scope

This Part of ISO/IEC 20943 covers procedures (method or guidance) for the specification

(building) of ontology based on ISO/IEC 11179 (2nd Ed.) – This part is based on only the second edition of ISO/IEC 11179.

provides just a method to use concepts in MDR for building ontology– e.g., How to utilize MDR to define a Concept for an ontology

This part does not contain ontology building methods by a specific ontology description language, such as RDF, RDF-S, OWL, Topic Maps, KIF, and so on

7Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 8: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Framework

8Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) 8

MDRs(Sets of concepts)

realized

build

Metadata Registry(ISO/IEC 11179)

DEC CD

DE

OC

. . .

Our Proposal

Web Ontology

Scope of this Part

utilizedEDREDR

(Environmental Data Registry)

caDSRcaDSR(US National

Cancer Institute)

METeOR

METeOR

(Metadata Online Registry)

Process Manager

Mapping Info. and Rulus

Page 9: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Understanding with an Example

MDRsample = (CD, OC, Property, DEC, DT, Rel)

DT: Data types

CR: Relations between Classes

CD = {Student, Professor}

OC = {GraduateStudent, FullProfessor}

Property={name, age, address}

DEC = {GraduateStudent.name, GraduateStudent.age,

FullProfessor.name, FullProfessor.age, FullProfessor.address}

DT = {String, int}

Rel = {advise, advised}

9Status Report of the Study Period on Procedure for the Specification of Web OntologyIssues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 10: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Understanding with an Example (cont.)

An Ontology Example Generated

10

FullProfessor

GraduateStudent

String int String

advise

nameage address

String int

name age

Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

advised

Page 11: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Scope

Scope of this Part covers procedures (method or guidance) for the specification

(building) of ontology based on ISO/IEC 11179 (2nd Ed.) – This part is based on only the second edition of ISO/IEC 11179.

provides just a method to use concepts in MDR for building ontology– e.g., How to utilize MDR to define a Concept for an ontology

This part does not contain ontology building methods by a specific ontology description language, such as RDF, RDF-S, OWL, Topic Maps, KIF, and so on

11Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 12: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Scope (cont.)

There are two comments related with the scope of this part

This part first considers the ongoing work on 11179-3 (3rd Ed.)– from Canada for the Wuhan meeting, August 2009.

This part considers the ongoing work on 19763-3 (2nd Ed.)– from the Wuhan Study Period meeting

12Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 13: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Scope (cont.)

Korea suggests that with the following reasons, we'd better first develop this part 20943-6: PSO based on MDR (2nd Ed.) Now there is an effort to harmonize MDR and MFI. MDR-3 (3rd Ed.) and MFI-3 (2nd Ed.) are under development. We need to support the existing MDR systems developed based on ISO/IEC

11179 (2nd Ed.)

13

Standardized

Established a Strategy for Harmization

This Part (20943-6)

Harmornization effort of MDR and MFI

ISO/IEC 11179-3 (3rd Ed.)

ISO/IEC 19763 MFI-3 (2nd Ed.)

Revision of this Part

New Project

Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

New subdivisions(for MDR-3 (3rd)and MRF-3 (2nd))

ConsideringMDR-3 (3rd), MFI-3 (2nd), &Hamornization

ConsideringMDR-3 (3rd), MFI-3 (2nd), &Hamornization

Page 14: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Usage of “Specification”

14Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Wuhan Meeting Korean Suggestion

We will use the words build, guidance, etc. and try to avoid the words specification and standard as they relate to this document.

Korea decided to use “build” instead of “specify”.

Page 15: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Project Title

Current Title Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Canana Input: SC32/WG2 N1291 Since the proposal deals with specifying Ontologies based on MDR, we

suggest this should be reflected in the project title. A simple change to the existing titles, removing ‘Web’ and inserting ‘MDR-

based’ gives:– Framework for MDR-based Ontology Specification– Procedure for MDR-based Ontology Specification

However, is it the Ontology or the Specification that is MDR-based? Perhaps the following would be better:

– Framework for MDR-based Specification of Ontology – Procedure for MDR-based Specification of Ontology

Suggestion from the Wuhan Meeting, August 2009 The group suggests a name such as:

– Guidance for Building Ontologies based on 11179-3 MDR and 19763-3 MFI

15Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 16: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Project Title (cont.)

Korea Suggestion We agreed that the word “Web” is removed from the original title 20943 family is based on ISO/IEC 11179 MDR.

: 20943 project title is “ISO/IEC 20943, Information Technology -- Procedures for Achieving Metadata Registry Content Consistency”

Therefore, we don't need to name using such a modifier “MDR-based” or “Based on 11179-3 and 19763-3 MFI“

– We need to follow the naming rule of 20943 family for providing conisistency

Titles Suggested: Framework for Building of Ontology (-gies) Procedure for Buidling of Ontology (-gies) Guidance for Building of Ontology (-gies)

16Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 17: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Issues: Additional?

17Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 18: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Future Plan

After this meeting, 1st Working Draft will be submitted 1st Working Draft will reflect the decisions and comments from this meeting

Submission Deadline? After this meeting ~ December 2009

18Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)

Page 19: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.

Dongwon Jeong

[email protected]; http://ist.kunsan.ac.kr Information Sciences & Technology Laboratory,Dept. of Informatics & Statistics,Kunsan National University

Q/A

You have additional discussions or comments,please contact: