Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC...
-
Upload
marshall-green -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC...
![Page 1: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification
of Web Ontology (PSO)
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting
London, UK, November 17, 2009
Dongwon Jeong, Doo-Kwon [email protected], [email protected]
Kunsan National University, Korea University
WG2 N1353
![Page 2: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Contents
Discussion History Background and Motivation Goal and Purposes Framework Scope Understanding with an Example Issues Future Plan
2Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 3: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Discussion History
The idea of this proposal has been presented in the following meetings
SC32 Joint Study Period, Clearwater, Florida, USA, January 2007
SC 32 Plenary and WG Meetings, New York, USA, May 2007
SC 32/WG 2 Interim, Seoul, Korea, December 2007
SC 32 Plenary and WG Meetings, Australia, May 2008
– Extension of the Study Period and Change of its Direction
SC 32/WG 2: Workshop on ROR-ODMS-SMMP Study Periods, Wuhan, China, November 2008
– WG2 N1177: Extending the Metadata Registry for Semantic Web
SC 32/WG 2 Interim, Portugal, November 2008
– WG2 N1219: Extending the Metadata Registry for Semantic Web: Subtitled “PSO: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology”
3Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 4: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Discussion History (cont.)
The idea of this proposal has been presented in the following meetings
SC 32 Plenary and WG 2 Meetings, Jeju, Korea, June 2009.
– Approved as a subdivision of ISO/IEC 20943 Part 6
– SC32 N1887 JTC1/SC32 Plenary Resolutions, 2009-06-26: 32N1887-SC32_Jeju_plenary_resolutions.pdf
– SC32/WG2 N1283 Presentation on Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology: WG2_N1283_Presentation_EMDR-Korea.ppt
SC 32/WG 2: Wuhan Study Period Meeting on ROR, ODMS, PSO, SQL/MM-8 MDR, Wuhan, China, August 2009.
– SC32/WG2 N1313 : WG2_N1313_WHU_ROS_09_019_MeetingMinutes.pdf
– Discussion on the comments from Canana (SC32/WG2 N1291)
4Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 5: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background & Motivation
5
MDR(Metadata Registry,
ISO/IEC 11179)
SemanticWeb
SyntacticWeb
Ontology
Contains standardized (common) concepts for various applications fields
Specifying Web ontology using common/standardized concepts in MDR for the Semantic Web
Evolution
Ontology
Ontology
Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 6: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Goal and Purposes
The goal of this proposal is to provide the Specification support of ontology using the concepts in
MDR
The purposes of this proposal are to promote the followings: Faciliation usability of MDR under the Semantic Web environment Building of ontology schema consisting of standardized concepts
– i.e., well-known concepts or generalized concepts, which are accepted by general users as well as domain experts
Easy and clear understanding of concepts across corresponding same or similar application fields
More formalized building of ontology Ease of definition (building) of ontology Enhancement of interoperability between ontologies
6Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 7: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Scope
This Part of ISO/IEC 20943 covers procedures (method or guidance) for the specification
(building) of ontology based on ISO/IEC 11179 (2nd Ed.) – This part is based on only the second edition of ISO/IEC 11179.
provides just a method to use concepts in MDR for building ontology– e.g., How to utilize MDR to define a Concept for an ontology
This part does not contain ontology building methods by a specific ontology description language, such as RDF, RDF-S, OWL, Topic Maps, KIF, and so on
7Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 8: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Framework
8Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) 8
MDRs(Sets of concepts)
realized
build
Metadata Registry(ISO/IEC 11179)
DEC CD
DE
OC
. . .
Our Proposal
Web Ontology
Scope of this Part
utilizedEDREDR
(Environmental Data Registry)
caDSRcaDSR(US National
Cancer Institute)
METeOR
METeOR
(Metadata Online Registry)
Process Manager
Mapping Info. and Rulus
![Page 9: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Understanding with an Example
MDRsample = (CD, OC, Property, DEC, DT, Rel)
DT: Data types
CR: Relations between Classes
CD = {Student, Professor}
OC = {GraduateStudent, FullProfessor}
Property={name, age, address}
DEC = {GraduateStudent.name, GraduateStudent.age,
FullProfessor.name, FullProfessor.age, FullProfessor.address}
DT = {String, int}
Rel = {advise, advised}
9Status Report of the Study Period on Procedure for the Specification of Web OntologyIssues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 10: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Understanding with an Example (cont.)
An Ontology Example Generated
10
FullProfessor
GraduateStudent
String int String
advise
nameage address
String int
name age
Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
advised
![Page 11: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Issues: Scope
Scope of this Part covers procedures (method or guidance) for the specification
(building) of ontology based on ISO/IEC 11179 (2nd Ed.) – This part is based on only the second edition of ISO/IEC 11179.
provides just a method to use concepts in MDR for building ontology– e.g., How to utilize MDR to define a Concept for an ontology
This part does not contain ontology building methods by a specific ontology description language, such as RDF, RDF-S, OWL, Topic Maps, KIF, and so on
11Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 12: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Issues: Scope (cont.)
There are two comments related with the scope of this part
This part first considers the ongoing work on 11179-3 (3rd Ed.)– from Canada for the Wuhan meeting, August 2009.
This part considers the ongoing work on 19763-3 (2nd Ed.)– from the Wuhan Study Period meeting
12Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 13: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Issues: Scope (cont.)
Korea suggests that with the following reasons, we'd better first develop this part 20943-6: PSO based on MDR (2nd Ed.) Now there is an effort to harmonize MDR and MFI. MDR-3 (3rd Ed.) and MFI-3 (2nd Ed.) are under development. We need to support the existing MDR systems developed based on ISO/IEC
11179 (2nd Ed.)
13
Standardized
Established a Strategy for Harmization
This Part (20943-6)
Harmornization effort of MDR and MFI
ISO/IEC 11179-3 (3rd Ed.)
ISO/IEC 19763 MFI-3 (2nd Ed.)
Revision of this Part
New Project
Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
New subdivisions(for MDR-3 (3rd)and MRF-3 (2nd))
ConsideringMDR-3 (3rd), MFI-3 (2nd), &Hamornization
ConsideringMDR-3 (3rd), MFI-3 (2nd), &Hamornization
![Page 14: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Issues: Usage of “Specification”
14Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
Wuhan Meeting Korean Suggestion
We will use the words build, guidance, etc. and try to avoid the words specification and standard as they relate to this document.
Korea decided to use “build” instead of “specify”.
![Page 15: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Issues: Project Title
Current Title Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
Canana Input: SC32/WG2 N1291 Since the proposal deals with specifying Ontologies based on MDR, we
suggest this should be reflected in the project title. A simple change to the existing titles, removing ‘Web’ and inserting ‘MDR-
based’ gives:– Framework for MDR-based Ontology Specification– Procedure for MDR-based Ontology Specification
However, is it the Ontology or the Specification that is MDR-based? Perhaps the following would be better:
– Framework for MDR-based Specification of Ontology – Procedure for MDR-based Specification of Ontology
Suggestion from the Wuhan Meeting, August 2009 The group suggests a name such as:
– Guidance for Building Ontologies based on 11179-3 MDR and 19763-3 MFI
15Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 16: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Issues: Project Title (cont.)
Korea Suggestion We agreed that the word “Web” is removed from the original title 20943 family is based on ISO/IEC 11179 MDR.
: 20943 project title is “ISO/IEC 20943, Information Technology -- Procedures for Achieving Metadata Registry Content Consistency”
Therefore, we don't need to name using such a modifier “MDR-based” or “Based on 11179-3 and 19763-3 MFI“
– We need to follow the naming rule of 20943 family for providing conisistency
Titles Suggested: Framework for Building of Ontology (-gies) Procedure for Buidling of Ontology (-gies) Guidance for Building of Ontology (-gies)
16Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 17: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Issues: Additional?
17Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 18: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Future Plan
After this meeting, 1st Working Draft will be submitted 1st Working Draft will reflect the decisions and comments from this meeting
Submission Deadline? After this meeting ~ December 2009
18Issues for Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO)
![Page 19: Issues for ISO/IEC 20943-6: Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology (PSO) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32/WG 2 Interim Meeting London, UK, November 17, 2009.](https://reader038.fdocuments.net/reader038/viewer/2022110101/56649ef05503460f94c012c1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Dongwon Jeong
[email protected]; http://ist.kunsan.ac.kr Information Sciences & Technology Laboratory,Dept. of Informatics & Statistics,Kunsan National University
Q/A
You have additional discussions or comments,please contact: