ISSUE FOUR (2016)€¦ · programmes and field trips their World Heritage Sites. To provide...
Transcript of ISSUE FOUR (2016)€¦ · programmes and field trips their World Heritage Sites. To provide...
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
1
The role of educational field trips in enhancing world heritage education
Tshepang Rose Tlatlane
Abstract
Heritage is one of the most contested topics in the world as it involves issues that range
from political, economic, social, technological and legal in nature. There is a need for
raising awareness and sharing knowledge and ideas about this topic. This paper discusses
the benefits of field trips as catalysts for heritage education. It explores the potential of
visiting world heritage sites and how that could enhance learning about heritage. The
research has found that educational visits develop learners critical and problem solving
skills. The paper also considers the value of field trips within the context of the digital
learning norms of the 21st century. It is therefore suggested that training workshops for
teachers and heritage organizations should be made a norm to support them in offering
and running field trips to World Heritage Sites. Educational field trips to World Heritage
Sites play a pivotal role in encouraging young people to pursue and promote the
conservation of natural and cultural heritage.
Keywords: World Heritage Education, Botswana, Field trips, Heritage Education
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
2
Introduction
Heritage sites are faced with many threats such as infrastructural development that
encroaches on the significance and authenticity of the sites, climate change, poverty and
conflict, which deteriorates and in some cases completely destroys heritage sites. In order
to address some of the threats, State Parties pledged by ratifying the 1972 UNESCO
Convention to conserve their respective heritage sites by fully adhering with the rules set
in the 1972 UNESCO Convention (UNESCO 1992). State Parties made a commitment to
develop and promote effective approaches to conservation of heritage sites. The
convention emphasised the need for research and training centres in helping to
counteract the dangers that threaten cultural or natural heritage. It is the commitment
that State Parties shall foster and intensify heritage education which is the basis for
educational field trips to World Heritage Sites (UNESCO 1992).
World Heritage
According to Abungu (1996), heritage refers to the resource of a country; this could be
cultural, historical or natural resource. Heritage institutions are those organizations that
are entrusted with the custodianship of these resources. Every World Heritage resource
has a unique beauty and an exceptional value thus a need to protect them. For example
the Historic Centre of Vienna which played an essential role as a leading European music
centre from the Viennese Classicism era until the early 20th century, the Robben Island
Museum whose buildings signify the triumph of democracy and freedom over oppression
and racism in South Africa and Shark Bay, Australia whose outstanding features include its
vast sea-grass beds (4,800 km2) and its dugong (‘sea cow’) population (UNESCO 2010).
Historic Centre of Vienna was inscribed in 2001, Robben Island in 1999 and Shark Bay,
Australia in 1991 (World Heritage Committee 2003).
The 1972 World Heritage Convention defined a World Heritage Site as an area or place
representing the most outstanding examples of the world’s natural and cultural heritage
(UNESCO 1992). For example Shark Bay (2016) noted that the heritage site is as an area of
outstanding beauty and wonder; mystery and grandeur; and is meaningful to the world.
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
3
Heritage Education in the 21st Century
In the continued call towards the protection of heritage and heritage resources,
transformative education is a viable tool that addresses some of the problems currently
besieging culture and heritage. According to IBIS Global Education Group (2014),
transformative learning is an approach which develops learners’ academic and practical
skills, in a way that lead them to reflect upon and re-evaluate their beliefs and
experiences. For example, informal training and educational visits answer a very
important question of “how to enhance learning about World Heritage Sites?” It is
therefore crucial to involve all stakeholders to provide quality education and share
knowledge through effective approaches to protecting heritage sites. A stakeholder refers
to groups or persons that have claim and interest and affect or affected by the operations
and decisions of an organization (Jeffery 2009). In relation to World Heritage Sites, the
existence of heritage operations and decisions government’s take on heritage sites
directly and indirectly impact stakeholders in many ways. It is important that teachers,
schools, heritage organizations and museums all work towards enhancing education
programmes and field trips their World Heritage Sites.
To provide evidence on the importance of educational trips, Shakil, Faizi and Hafeez
(2011), explained that educational trips are a means of essential learning, where students
go through essential learning experiences under the leadership and guidance of trained
instructors. UNESCO (2010) calls it ‘experimental leaning’ and have defined it as an
approach that entails creating a platform for debriefing and consolidation of skills and
thoughts through feedback, reflection and the application of the ideas and skills to new
situations.
Learning encompasses more than traditional teaching of sitting down in a classroom with
a pen and a paper; paying attention to a tutor or teacher (Behrendt and Franklin 2014).
Elias (2011) illustrates that learning is a result of interaction with instructors and tutors,
with content and/or with other people. To further elaborate, Houwer, Holmes and Moors
(2013) developed the “ontogenetic adaptation”, which the authors defined as changes in
the behaviour of an organism that result from regularities in the environment of the
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
4
organism. Their definition of learning embraces that learning is not subject to interaction
with other people only. It embraces that learning is a development in behaviour that is
impacted by what is going in the environment, either through experience, interaction and
research.
In the context of world heritage education, an educational visit is understood as outdoor
and practical field trips to properties of Outstanding Universal Value used to enhance
students’ knowledge. It is a way of exposing learners to the ‘tangible’ context of what
they have learnt through written and spoken language in the classroom. An educational
visit occurs when one goes out of a formal setting to observe and/or do activities that are
linked to the theory they have learnt in class and/or formal education.
Educational visits challenge learners to think critically about practical implications of
conservation, the ability to solve practical problems in their daily engagements with
heritage and decisions on heritage issues. According to Ocal’s (2016) report, educational
fieldtrips provide an opportunity for participants to learn by doing which enables
students to understand the link between the past and present and increases student’s
sensitivities towards the subject. Behrendt and Franklin (2014) noted that experiential
learning at formal and informal field trip venues increases student interest, knowledge,
and motivation.
Today learners are sophisticated and use technology more than ever before. The use of
technology has made possible digital visits to heritage sites, which involve the use of 3D
displays, mobile devices and systems such as the Augmented Reality (AR) to access or
navigate a site regardless of the actual physical distance (Walker 2008). According to
Ch’ng (2011:6), ‘technology allows remote access to heritage sites at any given space and
time without the site damaged by visitor pressure’. Thus, technology is not only a means
of sharing and transmitting knowledge but also presents a way of dealing with issues such
as degradation of heritage sites and climate change which are a global concern for
heritage sites.
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
5
Whilst Digital Heritage is now common in museums and cultural heritage sites (Bonacini
et al 2015), the challenges that come with it still favor physical field trips. It is argued by
Li, Liew and Su (2012) that Augmented Reality (AR) system lays emphasis on intermingling
actual with virtual environment from real time interaction, but however, the system does
not contemplate the pre-experience and after experience of visitors. Walker (2008)
claims that the common problem with digital devices is that there is normally a
separation between the contents on the device and the real world experience. That
makes the authenticity of the online experience questionable and untrustworthy as also
argued by Hazan (2015). In that regard, technologies may hinder students from
experiencing the real thing because it is part of the experience that will make people
remember the concept. Herein comes a popular saying ‘seeing is believing’ that has some
truth in it. Field trips to World Heritage Sites are therefore still essential in today’s digital
age.
Learners want to explore, experiment, to see, touch and to feel. This is substantiated in
Taylor and Parsons (2011) that learners of today are concerned with ‘relevancy’, which
can be achieved by engaging them through educational trips to heritage sites. Taylor and
Parsons (2011) further argue that learners ask that their learning apply to real-life
scenarios whenever possible as opposed to theory. This clearly illustrates that an
authentic and/or hands on experience during field trips helps learners make a better
sense of oral and written education and even apply them to their daily lives.
In her report, Kushins (2015:3) explains how a visit to Metropolitan Museum of Art,
Greece during one of her school trips shaped her professional life today.
“Experiences like this can play a powerful role in creative and intellectual development.
My professional life today is rooted in aesthetic awareness and historical empathy
grounded by such experiences.”
On a similar note, Robben Island Museum (2012) explain that many learners visiting the
World Heritage Site normally appreciate that it is a good experience being there and that
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
6
they are challenged to take on continue the legacies left for them by forefathers. During
one of the field trips, one student admitted;
“I felt very proud to see that place where they struggled for freedom. That is why I wanted
to take my photo here, to show my family who did not visit the island”
Experiences such as these will definitely make one remember heritage space, and even
share with other people. These experiences even have the power to inform one’s career
or line of business. In the very same manner, visits to heritage sites can develop ones
interest for heritage. Participants get to have fun and that is actually one of the things
that will make them remember the experience. It is being part of the experience that will
make people eager to share the stories and inspire other who may as well continue the
heritage education cycle. In that sense, visiting heritage sites is undoubtedly a sustainable
measure of providing heritage education.
Ocal (2016) explains that museums provide an opportunity for students to learn through
practical experiences which will increase their sensitivity towards heritage. While
Behrendt and Franklin (2014) also concur that interactive exhibits help students play with
concepts, activities often not possible in the classroom. Ch’ng (2011) claims that a digital
means could be used to get the younger generation absorb knowledge and skills, given
the rate that they are involved with technology over the years. However, despite the fact
that virtual heritage present a good opportunity to support conservation and
dissemination of heritage information; digitization is still at an infant stage in Botswana
(Mnjama 2010).
Digital heritage like any other approach has its own benefits and limitations. This
approach can be used to transmit world heritage information to the youth as their
engagement with technology continuous to grow enormously. Digital heritage is a
creative method that can be used to get the younger generation involved in conservation
and preservation of cultural and natural heritage as it suites their interests in the current
millennium. Virtual heritage is also beneficial in addressing some of the concerns
affecting heritage sites like climate change and land deterioration as anyone can have the
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
7
experience from their comfort zones. An online experience however cannot entirely
replace the authenticity of a physical experience. In addition, the legitimacy and certainty
of the online heritage experience is questionable. Therefore, virtual visits and educational
trips must be used all together to complement each other.
Social training approach
Social training is defined as the transfer of knowledge, skills and attitudes that can
transform a behavior and lead to improved performance in key social areas (Grossman
and Salas 2011). The ‘each one, teach one’ philosophy that was used by ex-political
prisoners at Robben Island World Heritage Site applies when participants go into an
educational trip to heritage sites. The skills are impacted on others through discussions
and questions in a more relaxed environment. Shakil, Faizi and Hafeez, (2011) argue that
educational trips offer students’ social training as they are normally taken in large group
and students are included from different social backgrounds. In fact, many educational
visits are organized for groups. Learners from different cultural backgrounds interact,
work together, and share information on different cultures and learning about a culture
locally and globally. This is necessary for learners to know more about what they learn in
classes, workshops and conferences and even to put the ideas into practice. Participants
can even watch dramas or do role plays displaying the life of the past which has the
power to make history interesting for those who would otherwise find it not. These kinds
of activities enable learners to map a relationship between the past and the present; to
relate to everyday life situations and give them a deeper understanding than just listening
to stories.
Through group based visits to World Heritage Sites, learners get to share ideas on what is
done differently in their respective countries and how it can benefit other heritage sites.
In that process, they also learn more about culture and cultural tolerance and take ideas
home, which is also a way of incorporating social training.
Social training extends to communities who have impact and are impacted by heritage
sites. Community involvement is vital as the concept of “each one, teach one” cannot be
implemented if people separate themselves from world heritage sites. Looking
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
8
specifically at some countries in Africa, for example, Botswana has established youth
development projects that seek to engage and sensitize the youth on the importance of
conservation through Community Based Natural Resources Management (CBNRM)
projects. Mining and Travel (2014) argue that CBNRM was initially aimed at wildlife
conservation and has now been extended to heritage management. According to Mining
and Travel (2014) The Kalahari Conservation with the Barclays Bank of Botswana
launched a Youth Development Rhino conservation project as a response to the CBNRM
outreach programme. The Youth Development and Rhino Conservation project was
motivated by the need to develop a great involvement of youth in conservation and
teaching environmental sustainability. Engagement of local communities in any form of
disseminating heritage education is vital as it gives them a sense of ownership on their
local resources and makes them cooperate in decision-making process concerning
heritage sites. Specifically, involving the youth is vital and conservation will be
undertaken by the youth of today and tomorrow.
Incorporation of World Heritage Education in the school syllabus: Botswana
Botswana has two heritage sites listed on the World Heritage Sites list, which are the
Okavango Delta and Tsodilo Hills. The Tsodilo Hills was declared a UNESCO Heritage site
in 2001 and was joined by the Okavango in 2014 (UNECSO 2015). In Botswana, menial
efforts have been made to link traditional knowledge to the school curriculum or to
incorporate indigenous knowledge into Botswana’s school system (Silo and Khudu-
Petersen 2016). However, even so, some attempts which include of incorporation
environmental education in subjects such as Environmental Science cannot be overlooked
(Silo 2015). Silo (2015) observes that Environmental Education clubs formed at schools
are focused much on the environment or natural heritage with emphasis on litter pick-
ups and cleaning campaigns and sometimes characterized by visits to the world heritage
sites and national monuments. Silo and Khudu-Petersen (2016) on the other hand argue
that schools’ educational trips to heritage sites are not compulsory but teachers‘ own
initiatives. Even so, Mosothwane and Ndwapi (2012) claim that in a research they
conducted with 60 trained primary school teachers, 63% of the participants reported this
was not a well established education and 75% said that they have not received enough
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
9
training that they could use to impact their students. The delivery of World Heritage
Education can be fostered by increasing teachers’ knowledge because with the lack of
skills and knowledge it is almost impossible to achieve a heritage sensitive future
(students). Students should be taught to harmonize and establish the relationship
between culture and the environment; appreciating the fact that our cultures are
informed or dependent on the natural environment. This will help to prepare students
also to respect cultures and traditions practiced at different world heritage sites.
Conclusion
In conclusion, experimental and experiential learning through educational visits to
heritage sites is one of the categories of learning, which plays a fundamental role in the
protection of heritage sites. Visiting World Heritage Sites has emerged as a catalyst for
learning and has the power to enhance knowledge. In today’s digital world, physically
going to a World Heritage Site has proven value. Educational visits to World Heritage
Sites are important as they allow visitors firsthand experiences that give them the ability
to gain social skills and transform their behavior and attitudes towards heritage. This
approach of learning also develops students’ critical and problem solving skills. Through
educational trips, learners get to make sense of history, relate it to the world today and
even put to practice the skills and ideas needed to protect heritage sites. Field trips
develop learners’ appreciation of heritage such that they can even be challenged to
pursue a career in heritage. It has also been found out that in most instances, educational
trips are taken in large groups that enable interaction among learners and learning from
one another in a more relaxed environment. Finally this social interaction allows
participants to learn about local and universal cultures, the spirit which promotes cultural
tolerance.
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
10
Recommendations
As a result of the findings and conclusion, this study recommends that;
Educational trips to World Heritage Sites should be made a norm in heritage education.
This will develop and increase learners’ sensitivity about heritage and will help them to
raise heritage sensitive future generations.
Participants should engage in activities symbolizing the significance of World Heritage
Sites, thereby developing a understanding based on the past, present and future.
It is essential to intensify education programs targeting the youth in schools to raise
awareness of cultural and natural sites. Awareness campaigns in schools will cultivate
appreciation for World Heritage Sites as well as promoting domestic tourism.
At World Heritage Sites, the youth should be given the platform to get involved in
conservation of natural and cultural heritage. This can be achieved by providing them
with education, training and allowing them to voice out on heritage related matters.
Author
Tshepang Rose Tlatlane studied BA (Hons) Tourism Management at Botswana
Accountancy College. Her education and career in Tourism has introduced her not only to
the world of tourism business but to the conservation and preservation of cultural and
natural resources as well. Tshepang loves heritage with passion and has participated in
the African World Heritage Youth Regional Forum in April 2016.
Contact: [email protected]
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
11
Bibliography
Abungu, G. (1996) Heritage Community and the state in the 90s: Experiences from Africa.
Presented at: The Future of the Past Conference. University of Western Cape, 10-12 July.
Apostolopoulou, A.P., Cavoeiras, L.M., and Klonari, A. (2014) Cultural heritage and
education: Integrating tour maps in a bilateral project. European Journal of Geography. 5,
(4), pp. 67-77.
Behrendt, M and Franklin, T. (2014) A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their
Value in Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 9, pp.
235 – 2345.
Ch’ng, E. (2011) Digital Heritage Tourism: Reconfiguring the Visitor Experience in Heritage
Sites, Museums and Architecture in the Era of Pervasive Computing. In: Percorsi creative
di turismo urbano (Creative Paths of Urban Tourism) Conference. Catania, 22 - 24
September 2011.
Elias, T. (2011) Learning analytics: Definitions, Processes and potential. [Online]. Available
at: http://learninganalytics.net/LearningAnalyticsDefinitionsProcessesPotential.pdf
(Accessed: 16 May 2016).
Grossman, R. and Salas, E. (2011) The transfer of training: what really matters.
International Journal of Training and Development, 15 (2), pp. 103-120.
Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., and Moors, A. (2013) What is learning? On the nature and
merits of a functional definition of learning. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.liplab.ugent.be/pdf/learningpreprint.pdf .Accessed 16 May 2016.
IBIS Global Education Group (2014) Concept Paper, Transformative Education. [Online].
Available from:
http://oxfamibis.dk/sites/default/files/media/pdf_global/methods_and_approaches/con
cept_paper_layout_final_-_transformative.pdf .Accessed 06 July 2016.
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
12
IUCN Botswana (2016) Programmes and Projects. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.iucnbot.bw/projects/index.html .Accessed 21 May 2016.
Kalusopa, T. and Zulu, S. (2009) Digital heritage material preservation in Botswana:
Problems and prospects. 28 (3), pp. 98 – 107.
Kushins, J. (2015) Pedagogical Souvenirs: An Art Educator’s Reflections on Field Trips as
Professional Development. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16 (2), pp. 1 –
19.
Hazan, S. (2015) Performing the Museum in an Age of Digital Reproduction. furnace
Journal. 2, pp. 1 – 77.
Li, Y., Liew, A., and Su, W. (2012) The Digital Museum: Challenges and Solution. [Online].
Available from:
http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/49660/79505_1.pdf?sequ
ence=1 .Accessed 08 July 2016.
Mana H. and Mana F. (2014) Poverty Alleviation through Pro-Poor Tourism: The Role of
Botswana Forest Reserves. Sustainability, 6, pp. 5697-5713.
Mbaiwa, J. E. (2008) Tourism development, rural livelihoods, and conservation in the
Okavango Delta, Botswana. [Online]. Available from:
http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-3064/MBAIWA-
DISSERTATION.pdf?sequence=1 .Accessed 23 May 2016.
Mining and Travel (2014) Barclays Bank Botswana engages Youth in Rhino Conservation.
[Online]. Available from: https://minetravel.co.bw/general-news/2014/08/01/barclays-
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
13
bank-botswana-engages-youth-in-rhino-conservation/#.V4ZSjfl96M8 .Accessed 06 July
2016.
Mnjama, N. (2010) Preservation and Management of Audiovisual Archives in Botswana.
20 (2), pp.139-148.
Mosothwane, M. and Ndwapi, G. (2012) Training Pre-Service Teachers in Environmental
Education: The Case of Colleges of Education in Botswana. International Journal of
Scientific Research in Education. 5 (1), pp. 26-27.
Ocal, T. (2016) The Effect of Field Trips to Historical Cultural Heritage Sites on Teacher
Candidates’ Academic Knowledge and Their Sensitivity. Creative Education, 7, pp. 376-
386.
Robben Island Museum (2002) Voices of Young People on Robben Island. South Africa:
Robben Island Museum.
Shakil, A.F., Faizi, W., and Hafeez, S. (2011) The need and importance of field trips at
higher level in karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business
and Social Sciences, 2 (1), pp. 67 – 97.
Shark Bay (2016). What is World Heritage? [Online]. Available from:
http://www.sharkbay.org.au/world-heritage/what_is_world_heritage.aspx .Accessed 16
May 2016.
Silo, N. (2015) Using Science as a tool for infusing environmental education in the school
curriculum – A barrier to education for sustainable development. European Journal of
Educational Studies. 17 (1), pp. 11-22.
Silo, N. and Khudu-Petersen, K. (2016) Hearing Ancestral Voices through Creative Art: A
Tool for Environmental Education for Sustainability. International Journal of Education &
the Arts. 17 (9), pp. 1-22.
ISSUE FOUR (2016)
14
Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011) Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in
Education, 14 (1), 1 – 33.
UNESCO (1992) Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage. [Online]. Available from: http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ .Accessed
23 May 2016.
UNESCO (2010) Teaching and learning for a sustainable future. [Online]. Available from:
http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_d/mod20.html .Accessed 16 May
2016.
UNESCO (2015) Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List. [Online]. Available from:
http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/BW/ .Accessed 07 July 2016.
Walker, K. (2008) Digital Technologies and the Museum Experience. [Online]. Available
from: http://www.lkl.ac.uk/people/kevin/book_chapter7.pdf .Accessed 16 July 2016.
World Heritage Committee (2003) Properties Inscribed on the World Heritage List.
[Online]. Available from:
http://www.waddenzee.nl/fileadmin/content/Dossiers/Overheid/pdf/Werelderfgoed_lijs
t.pdf .Accessed 10 July 2016.