Isotropic linear elastic response
Transcript of Isotropic linear elastic response
1Isotropic linear elastic response
Range of Young’s modulus 2
0.2
8
0.6
1
Magnesium,
Aluminum
Platinum
Silver, Gold
Tantalum
Zinc, Ti
Steel, Ni
Molybdenum
Graphite
Si crystal
Glass-soda
Concrete
Si nitrideAl oxide
PC
Wood( grain)
AFRE( fibers)*
CFRE*
GFRE*
Glass fibers only
Carbon fibers only
Aramid fibers only
Epoxy only
0.4
0.8
2
4
6
10
20
40
6080
100
200
600800
10001200
400
Tin
Cu alloys
Tungsten
<100>
<111>
Si carbide
Diamond
PTFE
HDPE
LDPE
PP
Polyester
PSPET
CFRE( fibers)*
GFRE( fibers)*
GFRE(|| fibers)*
AFRE(|| fibers)*
CFRE(|| fibers)*
From Callister, Intro to Eng. Matls., 6Ed
E [G
Pa =
109
N/m
2 ]Metals Alloys
Graphite Ceramics
Semicond.
Composites Fibers
Based on data in Table B2, Callister 6Ed. Composite data based on reinforced epoxy with 60 vol% of aligned carbon (CFRE), aramid (AFRE), or glass (GFRE) fibers.
What is the source of both universality and range in
modulus?
Polymers
3
Materials are made of atoms, held together by atomic interactions • covalent and ionic bonding: ceramics, semiconductors (~200 N/m) • metallic bonding: metals (~ 20 N/m) • van der Waals interaction: polymers (~ 0.5 N/m)
Materials are made of many atoms, governed by thermodynamics • materials choose structures, phase variables (such as density) that
minimize free energy: A = U − TS • A: Helmholtz free energy • U: internal energy (bonding) • T: (absolute) temperature • S: entropy (disorder: kB log Ω)
Universality of linear elastic response
4Thermodynamic “equation of state”
E
Equilibrium bond length
Bond energy
P(V) =@A@V
�����V
5
Materials are made of atoms, held together by atomic interactions • covalent and ionic bonding: ceramics, semiconductors (~200 N/m) • metallic bonding: metals (~ 20 N/m) • van der Waals interaction: polymers (~ 0.5 N/m)
Materials are made of many atoms, governed by thermodynamics • materials choose structures, phase variables (such as density) that
minimize free energy: A = U − TS • A: Helmholtz free energy • U: internal energy (bonding) • T: (absolute) temperature • S: entropy (disorder: kB log Ω)
Universality of linear elastic response
P(V) =@A@V
�����V
P(�V + V0) =@A@V
�����V0
+ �V@2A@V2
������V0
+12�V2 @
3A@V3
������V0
+ · · ·
= 0 +�VV0
0BBBB@V0@2A@V2
������V0
1CCCCA + · · ·
= ✏VK
✏k =1E�k ✏? = �
⌫E�k � =
1G⌧
• For small stresses the strains are linearly related to stresses:
• We can generalize these results by considering superposition 1.Each stress component (σx σy σz τxy τxz τyz) is considered individually 2.All of the strains from each stress component computed 3.Sum of all strains = material response to stress
Superposition principle 6
✏x
=1E
[�x
� ⌫(�y
+ �z
)]
✏y
=1E
[�y
� ⌫(�x
+ �z
)]
✏z
=1E
[�z
� ⌫(�x
+ �y
)]
�xy
=1G
⌧xy
�xz
=1G
⌧xz
�yz
=1G
⌧yz
• The superposition principle can relate our elastic moduli: • E: Young’s modulus (normal strain from uniaxial stress) • ν: Poisson’s ratio (perpendicular normal strain from uniaxial stress) • G: shear modulus (shear strain from shear stress) • K: bulk modulus (volume change from hydrostatic pressure)
Material property relationships 7
0 ⌧⌧ 0
!$
⌧ 00 �⌧
! 0 �/2�/2 0
!$
�/2 0
0 ��/2
!
� =1G⌧ �
2=
1E⌧ � ⌫
E(�⌧)
� =2(1 + ⌫)
E⌧
G =E
2(1 + ⌫)
• The superposition principle can relate our elastic moduli: • E: Young’s modulus (normal strain from uniaxial stress) • ν: Poisson’s ratio (perpendicular normal strain from uniaxial stress) • G: shear modulus (shear strain from shear stress) • K: bulk modulus (volume change from hydrostatic pressure)
Material property relationships 8
� =
0BBBBBB@
�p 0 00 �p 00 0 �p
1CCCCCCA ✏ =
0BBBBBBB@
� pE + 2⌫ p
E 0 00 � p
E + 2⌫ pE 0
0 0 � pE + 2⌫ p
E
1CCCCCCCA
�V = V(1 + ✏x
)(1 + ✏y
)(1 + ✏z
) � V
= V(1 + (✏x
+ ✏y
+ ✏z
) + · · · ) � V
�V
V
⇡ ✏x
+ ✏y
+ ✏z
= �3(1 � 2⌫)E
p = � p
K
K =E
3(1 � 2⌫)
9Anisotropic linear elastic response
10Isotropic stress/strain relations
✏x
=1E
[�x
� ⌫(�y
+ �z
)]
✏y
=1E
[�y
� ⌫(�x
+ �z
)]
✏z
=1E
[�z
� ⌫(�x
+ �y
)]
�xy
=1G
⌧xy
�xz
=1G
⌧xz
�yz
=1G
⌧yz
�x
=E
(1 + ⌫)(1 � 2⌫)
h(1 � ⌫)✏
x
+ ⌫(✏y
+ ✏z
)i
�y
=E
(1 + ⌫)(1 � 2⌫)
h(1 � ⌫)✏
y
+ ⌫(✏x
+ ✏z
)i
�z
=E
(1 + ⌫)(1 � 2⌫)
h(1 � ⌫)✏
z
+ ⌫(✏x
+ ✏y
)i
⌧xy
= G�xy
⌧xz
= G�xz
⌧yz
= G�yz
Is there a way to extend this to anisotropic response?
11General state of stress• Each point in a body has normal and shear stress components. • We can section a cubic volume of material that represents the state of
stress acting around the chosen point. • As the cube is at equilibrium the total forces and moments are zero:
• Infinitesimal cube = equal and opposite forces on opposite sides of cube • Note also: the values of all the components depend on how the cube is
oriented in the material (we’ll talk later about relating those values) • The combination of the state of stress for every
point in the domain is called the stress field.
• Stress × area = force Fi = Σj=xyz σij Aj
σxx=σx σxy=τxy σxz=τxz
σyx=τxy σyy=σy σyz=τyz
σzx=τxz σzy=τyz σzz=σz
Graphical stress tensor components 12
Defining strain 13
• We want to describe the dimension and shape change in a continuous cohesive body
• In a sufficiently small element, deformations of the element are all proportional to the size of the element
• length / length = unitless, % (10−2), mm/mm, µm/m (10−6), or in/in • Requires that we capture both the orientation of original vector and
change in that vector • Original relative position is a vector: one index = 3 numbers to describe • New relative position is a vector: one index = 3 numbers to describe • Strain is a tensor: two indices (coordinates) = 3×3 numbers to describe
• Normal strain describes a length change in a vector • Shear strain describes an orientation change in a vector
• Be aware: whether deformation changes length or changes orientation also depends on the original orientation
� = limAB,AC!0
✓⇡2� ✓0◆
Normal strain and shear strain 14
" = lim�s!0
�s0 � �s�s
• We can describe all the strains on an element in a body:
Normal strain and shear strain 15
normal strains
shear strains �xy
= (angle change in xy plane)= "
xy
+ "yx
deformation
"i j
=
0BBBBBBBBBBB@
✏x
12�xy
12�xz
12�xy
✏y
12�yz
12�xz
12�yz
✏z
1CCCCCCCCCCCA
✓xy
= (rotation in xy plane)
= "yx
� "xy
• Strain × length = length change
Graphical strain tensor components
εxx=ϵx εxy=½γxy εxz=½γxz
εyx=½γxy εyy=ϵy εyz=½γyz
εzx=½γxz εzy=½γyz εzz=ϵz
δℓi = Σj=xyz εij ℓj16
17Elastic constants: stiffnesses and compliances• Just as stress relates a vector (area) to another vector (force), and strain
relates a vector (position) to another vector (change in position), our elastic constants relate stresses to strains: 4th rank tensors
• 3×3×3×3 = 81 components! • But first two and last two are symmetric: xyzz = yxzz and zzxy = zzyx • And first pair and last pair can be swapped: xyzz = zzyx
• Stiffness is a second derivative of energy: Cijkl = d2U/dϵij dϵkl
• Results in 21 unique elastic constants. Better written with Voigt notation:
✏i j =X
kl
Sijkl�kl �i j =X
kl
Cijkl✏kl
compliance[GPa−1]
stiffness[GPa]
0BBBBBB@
�1 �6 �5�6 �2 �4�5 �4 �3
1CCCCCCA
0BBBBBBBBB@
e112 e6
12 e5
12 e6 e2
12 e4
12 e5
12 e4 e3
1CCCCCCCCCA
ei =6X
j=1
Sij� j
�i =6X
j=1
Cijej
1 2 3xx yy zz4 5 6yz xz xz
18Elastic constants: stiffnesses and compliances• The S and C matrices are inverses of each other • The 21 stiffness and compliance matrix entries have factors of 2 and 4 to
convert to tensor components: • Cab = Cijkl for a=1..6, b=1..6 • Sab = Sijkl for a=1..3 and b=1..3 • Sab = 2Sijkl for a=1..3 and b=1..6 or a=4..6 and b=1..3 or • Sab = 4Sijkl for a=4..6 and b=4..6
• Crystalline symmetry reduces the number of unique and nonzero entries
Stiffness / Compliance symmetry
0BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB@
xx|xx
xx|yy
yy|xx
! xx|zz
zz|xx
! xx|yz xx|zy
yz|xx zy|xx
! xx|zx xx|xz
zx|xx xz|xx
! xx|xy xx|yx
xy|xx yx|xx
!
· yy|yy
yy|zz
zz|yy
! yy|yz yy|zy
yz|yy zy|yy
! yy|zx yy|xz
zx|yy xz|yy
! yy|xy yy|yx
xy|yy yx|yy
!
· · zz|zz
zz|yz zz|zy
yz|zz zy|zz
! zz|zx zz|xz
zx|zz xz|zz
! zz|xy zz|yx
xy|zz yx|zz
!
· · · yz|yz yz|zy
zy|yz zy|zy
! yz|zx yz|xz zx|yz xz|yz
zy|zx zy|xz zx|zy xz|zy
! yz|xy yz|yx xy|yz yx|yz
zy|xy zy|yx xy|zy yx|zy
!
· · · · zx|zx zx|xz
xz|zx xz|xz
! zx|xy zx|yx xy|zx yx|zx
xz|xy xz|yx xy|xz yx|xz
!
· · · · · xy|xy xy|yx
yx|xy yx|yx
!
1CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCA
Symmetry operations
2-fold axis 3-fold axis 4-fold axis
mirror plane mirror plane
Rotating a cube around the body diagonal ⟨111⟩?
3-fold axis
21Elastic constants: stiffnesses and compliances• The S and C matrices are inverses of each other • The 21 stiffness and compliance matrix entries have factors of 2 and 4 to
convert to tensor components: • Cab = Cijkl for a=1..6, b=1..6 • Sab = Sijkl for a=1..3 and b=1..3 • Sab = 2Sijkl for a=1..3 and b=1..6 or a=4..6 and b=1..3 or • Sab = 4Sijkl for a=4..6 and b=4..6
• Crystalline symmetry reduces the number of unique and nonzero entries • Cubic symmetry is the most common for structural materials:
• C11 = C22 = C33 • C12 = C13 = C23 • C44 = C55 = C66 • all others zero
• Isotropic materials are cubic and C11−C12 = 2C44 (or S11−S12 = S44/2) • Hexagonal materials and aligned fiber composites have lower symmetry:
• C11 = C22 ≠ C33; C12 ≠ C13 = C23; C44 = C55 ≠ C66
• Isotropic in basal plane: 2C66 = C11−C12
• all others zero
Graphical compliance components
εij = Σk=xyz Σl=xyz Sijkl σkl
εxx
=
σxx1E
+−
σyy
-−νE
σzz
-−νE
Sxxxx = 1/E Sxxyy = -ν/E Sxxzz = -ν/ESxxkl = 0 for all other kl
Voigt and Reuss averages
C11 =13
(C11 + C22 + C33)
C12 =13
(C12 + C13 + C23)
C44 =13
(C44 + C55 + C66)
EVoigt
=
⇣C
11
� C12
+ 3C44
⌘ ⇣C
11
+ 2C12
⌘
2C11
+ 3C12
+ C44
Voigt average = isostrain
...Randomly oriented grains
Voigt and Reuss averagesReuss average = isostress
...Randomly oriented grains 1
EReuss=
15
⇣3S11 + 2S12 + S44
⌘
S11 =13
(S11 + S22 + S33)
S12 =13
(S12 + S13 + S23)
S44 =13
(S44 + S55 + S66)
EVoigt > Erandom polycrystal > EReuss
Grain structure and textureNi alloy grain structure
Each grain has a different orientation, and responds differently to applied stress
Polycrystalline response is an average of individual grain responses.
Texture is a preferential orientation of grains.
M. Groeber et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 712, 1712 (2004).
Ti / TiB metal-matrix compositeSEM backscatter: polish
SEM secondary e-: deep etch
Ci j =
0
BBBBBB@
419 92 113 0 0 092 523 63 0 0 0
113 63 418 0 0 00 0 0 196 0 00 0 0 0 179 00 0 0 0 0 220
1
CCCCCCAGPa
TiB: orthorhombic crystal
EVoigt = 442GPaEReuss = 435GPaETi = 110GPa
ETi+20%vol TiB = 153GPaS. Gorsse et al., Mat. Sci. Eng. A340, 80-87 (2003)
D. R. Trinkle, Scripta Mater. 56, 273-276 (2007)
Bovine femural bone: elastic constants
bone orthotropic stiffnesses:
along length: E3 = 21.7GPa
transverse: E1 = 11.6GPa
W. C. Buskirk et al., J. Biomech. Eng. 103, 67-72 (1981)
longitudinal (3)
transverse (1,2)
Ci j =
0
BBBBBB@
14 6.3 4.8 0 0 06.3 18.4 7.0 0 0 04.8 7.0 25 0 0 0
0 0 0 7.0 0 00 0 0 0 6.3 00 0 0 0 0 5.3
1
CCCCCCAGPa
Extracted from sound-speed measurements:C11 = r(v11)2 C22 = r(v22)2 C44 = r(v23)2
Composite behavior 28
Composite = matrix + reinforcementMatrix: continuous phase • transfers load to reinforcement • protects reinforcement from environment Types of matrix: • MMC metal matrix composite: designed for plastic strain
• better yield stress, tensile strength, creep resistance • CMC ceramic matrix composite: designed for fracture
• better toughness • PMC polymer matrix composite: designed for elastic and plastic
strain • better modulus, yield stress, tensile strength, creep • inexpensive, temperature range limited by polymer decomposition
Reinforcement: stronger, discontinuous phase • carries significant portion of load • classified by geometry
29
Spheroidite steel
cemented carbide
10µm
100µm
ferrite (bcc-Fe)
cementite (Fe3C)
Co matrix (Vm=10-15%)
WC particlesFrom Callister, Intro to Eng. Matls., 6Ed
Particle reinforcements 30
From Callister, Intro to Eng. Matls., 6Ed
100nm Tire rubber
rubber
carbon particles
S. Gorsse et al., Mat. Sci. Eng. A340, 80-87 (2003).
Ti/TiB MMC
alpha-Ti (hcp)
TiB needles
Particle reinforcements 31
fracturesurface
Mo + Ni3Al
alpha-Mo (bcc)Ni3Al (gamma’)
W. Funk et al., Met. Trans A19, 987-998 (1988).
From F.L. Matthews and R.L. Rawlings, Composite Materials; Engineering and Science, Reprint ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000. (a) Fig. 4.22, p. 145 (photo by J. Davies); (b) Fig. 11.20, p. 349 (micrograph by H.S. Kim, P.S. Rodgers, and R.D. Rawlings).
Glass (E=76GPa) with SiC fibers (E=400GPa)
Fiber reinforcements: continuous, aligned 32
carbon-carbon composite
C matrix
C fibers
processed by laying down fibers in binder (pitch); high heat converts binder to C matrix
Randomly oriented fibers layered in 2D, not continuous
with composite
Fiber reinforcements: discontinuous, random 33
Determining mechanical behavior
isoload/isostress isostrain
equal load in phases equal strain in phases
34
Stress / strain response depends on • material properties (E, TS, σY) of matrix +
reinforcement • amount of matrix + reinforcement (Vm, Vr=1−Vm) • orientation of reinforcement relative to load • size and distribution of reinforcement • geometry (length of fibers, cross-sectional shape,
aspect ratio) Two limiting cases for analysis:
equal length/strain in phases
Similar to Voigt average
ℓreinforcement = ℓmatrix = ℓcomposite
εreinforcement = εmatrix = εcomposite
shared load: Fc = Fm + Fr
Fc
A=
Fm
A+
Fr
A
�c =Fm
Am
Am
A+
Fr
Ar
Ar
A�c = Vm�m + Vr�r ROM for stresses
Isostrain 35
equal load/stress in phases
Similar to Reuss average
Freinforcement = Fmatrix = Fcomposite
σreinforcement = σmatrix = σcomposite
`0c = `0m + `
0r
`c(1 + "c) = `m(1 + "m) + `r(1 + "r)1 + "c = Vm(1 + "m) + Vr(1 + "r)"c = Vm"m + Vr"r
shared length:
ROM for strains
Isoload / isostress 36
Cu 20% 40% 60% 80% Wvolume fraction (W)
100
200
300
E [G
Pa]
Elastic moduli of the composite are constrained by two limits: isostrain and isoload isostrain
isoload
Rule of mixtures: Cu particles + W matrix 37
Ec = VmEm + KcVpEp
(T.S.)c = Vm(T.S.)m + KsVp(T.S.)p
Empirical relations:
Kc ≠ Ks < 1
Orientation effects on tensile strength 38
Tensile stress not parallel to fibers has complex stress state: 3 limiting cases:
1.small misorientation: limited by fiber failure (σ‖ = σ cos2 θ)
2.large misorientation: limited by matrix tensile failure (σ⟂ = σ sin2 θ)
3.medium misorientation: limited by matrix shear failure (τ = σ cos θ sin θ)
(T.S.)
c
=�?k
cos
2 ✓
(T.S.)c =�??
sin2 ✓
(T.S.)
c
=⌧
m,y
cos✓ sin✓
� =
� cos
2 ✓ � cos✓ sin✓� cos✓ sin✓ � sin
2 ✓
!
Orientation effects on tensile strength 39
Tensile stress not parallel to fibers has complex stress state: 3 limiting cases:
� =
� cos
2 ✓ � cos✓ sin✓� cos✓ sin✓ � sin
2 ✓
!
(T.S.)
c
=�?k
cos
2 ✓
(T.S.)c =�??
sin2 ✓
(T.S.)
c
=⌧
m,y
cos✓ sin✓
0 30 60 90θ [degrees]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120Te
nsile
stre
ngth
[MPa
]
Tsai-Hill
smallmisorientation
intermediatemisorientation
largemisorientation
Orientation effects on tensile strength 40
Tensile stress not parallel to fibers has complex stress state: Some limitations:
1.Predicts that tensile strength increases for small misorientation. 2.Predicts “cusps” in strength vs. misorientation angle. 3.Doesn’t account for multiaxial loading effects. Solution: Tsai-Hill failure criterion:
�k�?k
!2
� �k�?�? 2?
!+
�?�??
!2
+
⌧⌧m,y
!2
= 1
(T.S.)
c
=
266664
cos
4 ✓
�? 2
k+
sin
4 ✓
�? 2
?+ cos
2 ✓ sin
2 ✓
1
⌧2
m,y
� 1
�? 2
k
!377775�1/2
� =
� cos
2 ✓ � cos✓ sin✓� cos✓ sin✓ � sin
2 ✓
!
Orientation effects on tensile strength 41
Tensile stress not parallel to fibers has complex stress state:
� =
� cos
2 ✓ � cos✓ sin✓� cos✓ sin✓ � sin
2 ✓
!
0 30 60 90θ [degrees]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Tens
ile st
reng
th [M
Pa]
Tsai-Hill
smallmisorientation
intermediatemisorientation
largemisorientation
(T.S.)
c
=
266664
cos
4 ✓
�? 2
k+
sin
4 ✓
�? 2
?+ cos
2 ✓ sin
2 ✓
1
⌧2
m,y
� 1
�? 2
k
!377775�1/2
Tsai-Hill smooths out cusps Never exceeds aligned T.S.