ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility.
-
Upload
isabel-holden -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility.
ISO/IEC Joint Technical Committee 1
Develop, maintain, promote and facilitate IT standards required by global markets meeting business and user requirements.
17 Subcommittees, 3 SWGs 28 P Members (National Bodies) 155 Publications in 2005 16 ISO and IEC Liaisons 22 “External” Liaisons IT Integration a key role
SWG - Accessibility
October 2004 ISO/IEC JTC 1 Resolution. Gather user needs (direct participation,
workshops, liaisons). Inventory all known accessibility standards efforts. Identify where voluntary standards efforts are not
addressed. Track laws, policies, guidelines. Encourage the use of globally relevant voluntary
standards.
Open Membership
ISO/IEC JTC 1 National Bodies and Liaisons ISO, IEC or ITU-T committees with accessibility
activities Regional standard and support organizations Representatives of consortia/fora Consumer Organizations and User
Representatives
Meetings to Date
SWG – A Meeting Sheffield, UK – April 2005
Task Group Sessions Toronto, Canada – July 2005
SWG – A Meeting Tokyo, Japan – August 2005
SWG – A Meeting Los Angeles, California – March 2006 Held in conjunction with California State University, Northridge
Center on Disabilities' 21st Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference (CSUN)
Task Group 2 – Inventory/Gap Analysis
Survey form to request assistance from accessibility standards Editors.
Used “IT Hardware” as first domain. Identified 88 existing IT hardware accessibility
standards.
Gathering information on standards for software, communications (user interface), public access terminals, consumer electronics.
Task Group 1 – User Needs
Develop User Outreach Plan.Essential to have direct, varied user input.
User Needs Summary developed.Functional expectations plotted to user needs
with cross references to Guide 71.
Example: Perceive status of controls and indicators Note: content for demonstration only – document far more complete
Some need an auditory or tactile equivalent to any visual indicators or operational cues, man-made or natural. 8.2.2 Alternatives to visual information
Some need a visual or tactile indicator for any auditory indicators or operational cues, designed (e.g. beeps, lights) or intrinsic (e.g. machine sounds, visual movements). 8.2.3 Alternatives to auditory information
Some need visual or auditory alternative to any subtle tactile feedback. 8.12.3.3 Status of controls
Some need visual indicators (e.g. LEDs, on screen indicators, mouse cursors) to be visible with low vision.
8.6 Size and style of font and symbols in information, warnings and labelling of controls
Some need to have controls and indicators perceivable without relying on color
8.5.3 Colour coding of information
Yet to Do
Determine user requirements that are not being met by an existing standard.
Disseminate the information widely Increase the value of the information.Ensure that voluntary, international standards
responsibly address all accessibility needs.