Islamic Banking
description
Transcript of Islamic Banking
BK 6503, BK5503January Semester 2011Prof. Saiful Azhar Rosly, Ph.DDepartment of Banking, INCEIF
Islamic Banking 1
2
Islamic banking and finance Islamic finance has grown tremendously since it
first emerged in the 1970's. Current global Islamic banking assets and assets under management have reached USD750 billion and is expected to hit USD1 trillion by 2010.
There are over 300 Islamic financial institutions worldwide across 75 countries According to the Asian Banker Research Group, The World's 100 largest Islamic banks have set an annual asset growth rate of 26.7% and the global Islamic Finance industry is experiencing average growth of 15-20% annually.
3
Contents4
Islamic Finance Islamic Banking Business Shariah Framework Regulatory Framework Legal Framework Deposits Financing Operations Risk faced by Islamic banks
Islamic Finance
• EQUITY,JUSTICE and FAIRNESS• Deterministic ie Rule set by God• Shariah Rules• Philosophy – Maqasid Al-Shariah
Doing the
Right Thing
• EFFICIENCY – efficient use of scarce resources (ie funds)
• Using Reason and Facts in decision making
• Strategies, Planning, Process/procedures.
• Back, Middle, Front Office.
Doing Things Right
Peter Drucker
Islamic Finance6
Shari’ ComponentsProduct development and
screenning activitiesValue: Quran and Hadiths
(Shariah)JUSTICE AND EQUITY
Tabi’ ComponentsBusiness models,
strategies and policiesValue: Reason and
ExperienceEFFICIENCY
The Emergence of Islamic Finance
7
1960s and 1970sIslamic Economics
1980s/1990sIslamic Banking
2000 onwardsIslamic Finance
Components of Islamic Finance
8
Islamic
Finance
Shariah
Islamic Economics
Islamic Banking
Islamic Capital Market
Takaful
Islamic Wealth Plannin
g
Three Facets of Islamic Finance
9
As a Field of Study
Shariah (Quran,Hadiths
and Fiqh)as Primary or
Core Knowledge
Secondary Knowledge from Reason and Facts
As a Financial System : Set of
Rules and Regulation that
govern the flow of funds from the
Surplus Unit to the Deficit Unit
Rule 1: Al-Ghorm bil Ghonm“no reward
without risk”
Rule 2: Al-Kharaj bil Daman“with profit
comes responsibility”
As a Business
Equity ObjectiveAchievable by
adhering to the Shariah Rules and
Values
Efficiency Objective
Achievable by observing the law
in nature.
TOPIC 1ISLAMIC BANKING BUSINESS
Nature of the Banking Business11
The Banking Business: Banks as Financial Intermediaries
12
Holds Capit
al
Takes Depos
itsMakes Loans
Intermediation function of Conventional banking: Bank as a borrower and lender and carry financial risks
13
Deficit Sector Surplus SectorBank as financial Intermedi
ary
A Bank as a Financial Intermediary Make loans to
customers Borrows from
depositors
Holds capital
14
Conventional Banks: Market for deposits and loans based on interest rates.
15 Market for
DepositsDemand
for DepositsSupply
of Deposits
Market for
LoansDemand for Loans
Supply of Loans
r
D
r
Loans eposit
Sd
Dd
SL
DL
id
iL
D1L1
Market for DepositMarket for Financing
LiabilityAsset
Deposits $200m@ 5%
Loans $200m@10%The Banking Business
profit = (iL x L) – (iD x D) = (0.1 x 200m) – (0.05 x $200m) = $20m - $10m = $10 million
10%5%
$200m$200m
Capital
16
Profit versus Financial Stability
17 More bank profits: Bank take risky and aggressive and “irresponsible” positions to maximize profits
Credit defaults and bank closures: FinancialInstability
Bank - Corporate Score Card (Actual versus Budget) Operating Profit before Allowances for Loss Profit before Tax and Zakat Profit after Tax and Zakat Return on Equity Return on Asset Fee based income to Total income Productivity ratio 1. Overhead to total income2. Staff cost per employee Gross Financing to total deposit Financing growth Non-performing financing Financing loss coverage Risk-weighted Capital Ratio (RXCR)
18
19
Bank Regulation: The 3 Pillars of Basel II
The new Basel Accord is comprised of ‘three pillars’…
Pillar IMinimum Capital
Requirements
Establishes minimum standards for management of capital on a more risk sensitive basis:
• Credit Risk• Operational Risk• Market Risk
Pillar IISupervisory Review
Process
Increases the responsibilities and levels of discretion for supervisory reviews and controls covering:
• Evaluate Bank’s Capital Adequacy Strategies
• Certify Internal Models• Level of capital charge• Proactive monitoring of
capital levels and ensuring remedial action
Pillar IIIMarket Discipline
Bank will be required to increase their information disclosure, especially on the measurement of credit and operational risks.
Expands the content and improves the transparency of financial disclosures to the market.
The Banking Business20
Bank Capit
al
Capital Adequacy ratio = 8%
Risk-Weight Assets - to reflect risk-profile of business
unitsTo absorb potential
losses
Business of Leveraging CAR = 8%. CAR = Capital/ RWA; 0.08 = $100m/RWARWA = $1250m
$1250m
(for every $1 financing, it is supported with 8 cents of bank’s capital)
$1250m
Capital = $100m
(Bank can raise up to $1.25billion of deposits from its $100m capital)
Financing Deposits
21
Risk-taking and Capital Allocation
$100m 50%
CAR = K/RWA0.08 = K/ ($100
x .5)K = $4m(to make $100m loan at
50% RW, the bank needs to hold $4m)
Financing Risk weights Capital
22
Risk-taking and Capital Allocation
$100m 150%
CAR = K/RWA0.08 = K/ ($100 x
1.5)K = $12m(to make $100m loan
without collateral at 150% RW, the bank needs to hold $12m)
Financing Risk weights Capital
23
Risky Financing and Capital Stress
24
Risky positio
ns
Higher Risk-
weights
Higher capital
Conventional risk-weights
Loans with collateral
Personal loan Government
bonds Corporate bonds Equities
50% 100% 50% 80% 150%
Financing Risk-weights
25
Risk-weights: Islamic products
Murabaha with collateral
AITAB (financial lease with collateral)
Government Sukuk Corporate sukuks Equities Istisna Bona fide Murabaha
50% 50% 50% 80% 150% 150% 150% 150%
Financing Risk-weights
26
Conventional Banking Balance Sheet
27Asset Liability
Cash Current AccountHome Loans Savings AccountHP Car loans Fixed depositsPersonal Loans NICDGovernment SecuritiesCorporate BondsFixed Assets Shareholders’ Capital
Conventional banking P & L28
Profit and LossRevenuesCost of Funds
$500m$200m
Gross Profit $300mOverheadsProvisions for NPL
$80m$10m$5m
Profit Before Tax $200mTax $60mNet Profit $140m
29
1. High NPL
2. Low revenues3. High cost of
deposits
Negative Earnings
Capital Erosion
Bank Insolvent
30
1. Low NPL
2. High revenues
3. Low cost of
deposits
Positive Earnings
Capital Accumula
tion
Healthy & Stable
Banking
31
Bank Business
Model?
SafeLow yielding loans with
control repayment
AggressiveHigh yielding
Loans without
collateralIrressponsi
bleLoans to non-
viable customer“subprime
loans”
Islamic Banking within conventional financial system32
Holds Capital
Take Deposi
ts
Extend Financi
ng
Islamic banking: Bank as mudarib/agent and depositors as investors: as a mudarib, the bank manages deposit funds.
33
Deficit Sector Surplus SectorBank as financial Intermedi
ary
Islamic banks as financial intermediaries
34
• Based on Trading contracts
• Not based on lending and borrowing contracts
Deposit
Market• Based on Trading
contracts• Not based on
lending and borrowing contracts
Financing
Market
“Allah has allowed Al-Bay (trading) but prohibits Riba” (Al-Baqarah 275)
35
AL-BAY RIBA
36
Al-Bay
Money exchanged for
goods and services
Business riskCapital loss due to adverse price
movement
RibaMoney
exchanged for more money
Financial risksCapital loss due to credit default and interest rate
volatilities
Trading Models37
• Buy • Sell
Trading
Model I
• Buy• Sell• Financing
Trading
Model II
FinancingTradin
g Model
II
Trading (Al-Bay) Models38
Trading Model 1
• Buys at $10• Sells at $15
cash• Profit = $5
• Business risk
Trading Model II
• Buys at $10• Sells at $15
cash• Sells at $20
credit• Profit = $5
+ $5 = $10
• Business risk
• Credit risk• Interest rate
risk
Trading Model III
• Buys at $15• Sells at $20
credit• Profit = $5
• Credit risk• Interest rate
risk
39
• Capital = $50 million• Asset = $50 millionTradin
g• Capital = $50 million
• Asset = $625 million (CAR = 8%)
Islamic
banking
Business risk in Trading > Business risk in Islamic Banking
40
• Business riskTrading
• Business risk• Financial risk
Islamic banking
with credit system
• Business risk• Financial risk
Conventional
banking with credit
system
Islamic Banking Under Basel II
41
Using Trading Model in Banking
Taxes on asset
purchases
Capital charges on
asset purchases and equity investment Bank faces
high business risk with
expectation to earn
higher profits
Types of Islamic banks42
Islamic Bank A
Buy and Hold and sell
on credit
Business risk + financial
risks
Islamic Bank B
Sale and buyback
without title transfers
Financial Risks
Islamic Financial Market43
Islamic Financial Market
Direct Financial Market
(Capital Market)
Sukuk65%
SC Screening
Equity85%
SC Screening
Indirect Financial market
Bank20%
Takaful18%
Unit TrustMutual Funds
Venture Capital
Dual-Banking System44
Asset LiabilityMortgage SavingHire-Purchase
Fixed Deposit
PersonalBonds Capital
Asset LiabilitiesFinancingMortgageHPPersonal
Wadiah Dhamanah Savings
Operational Leasing
Investment Accounts
JVStocksSukuks Capital
IBA 1983: Trading ContractsBAFIA 1989 : Lending and Borrowing Contracts
US Banking Glass-Stegall Act
1932
Wall separating Commercial and Investment Banking and Insurance companies
The Gramm–Leach–Bailey Act 1999
Allowed commercial banks, investment banks, securities firms, and insurance companies to consolidate
45
Universal Banking Retail Banking + Investment Banking +
Insurance Retail Banking:1. Take deposits2. Make loans Investment Banking1. Underwriting2. Lead-Arrange Insurance1. Underwrite pure risk
46
Islamic Banking Under IBA 1983
47 Financing
FinancingMortgage
Hire-PurchasePersonal, enterprise
,
Leasing
Venture capital
Property
Deposit
Saving
PSIA
Private Equity
Asset LiabilitiesFinancing Wadiah
Dhamanah Savings
Operational Leasing
PSIA
JV
Stocks
Sukuks Capital
MORE OUTPUT AND REAPING ECONOMIES OF SCALE
BENEFITS
Simple Bank Organization48
Board of Directors
Corporate Retail Investment
Risk Managem
entICBU
CEO
Shariah Advisory Committee Audit
Islamic Bank’s Average Balance Sheet
49Asset Liability
Cash Wadiah Dhamanah Current Account
BBA Home Financing Wadiah Dhamanah Savings Account
AITAB Car Financing Restricted Mudarabah Account
Bay al-Inah Personal FinancingEnterprise Financing
Unrestricted Mudarabah Account
Government Islamic Securities
Commodity MurabahahNegotiable Islamic Certificate of Deposits
SukukFixed Assets Shareholders’ Capital
Income Statement‘Reward comes with Risk”
50Islamic Banking
Profit and LossRevenuesCost of Funds
$500m$200m
Gross Profit $300mOverheadsProvisions for NPFProfit Equalization Reserve
$80m$10m$5m
Profit Before Tax and Zakat
$200m
Tax and Zakat $60mNet Profit $140m
r
D
r
Financing eposit
Sd
Dd
SL
DL
rd1
rL1
D1F1
Market for DepositMarket for Financing
LiabilityAsset
Deposits $200mFinancing $200mThe Banking Business
Profit = (rF1 x F1) – (rd1 x D1) = (0.1 x 200m) – (0.05 x $200m) = $20m - $10m = $10 million
10%5%
$200m$200m
Capital
51
Conventional bank
Profit = (iL x L) – (iD x D)iL = 10%, iD = 5%L = D = $100 million
Profit = (0.1 x 100) – (0.05 x 100) = 10m – 5 m = $5m
Islamic BankProfit = (rF x F) – (rD x D)rF = 10%, rD = 5%F = D = $100m
Profit = (0.1 x 100) – (0.05 x 100) = 10m –.5 m = $5
52
Islamic Bank as a Financial Intermediary1. CAR 8%1a. Bank Capital1b. RW = 50%0.08 = [$20b/F x 0.5] F = $500b
$20b
2. Investment Deposit (Partnership) Transaction Deposit
$500m@ 5% ex post
3. Financing (Trade) $500m@10%
4.Revenue $500m x 0.1 = $50b5. Cost of deposits $500m x 0.05 = $25b6. Overhead $3b7. Provisions $1b8. Profit $50b – ($25b + 3B + $1b) =
$21
9. ROE ($21b/$20b) x 100%= 105%10. ROD 5%
53
EXERCISE 1: FINANCING DEPOSIT
• BBA $300@8%• AITAB $600@7%• Personal F $250@10%• Sukuk$80m@5%• Mudarabah
$20m@15% Total = $1250
Calculate:Total revenues =
• CASA $300@1%• PSIA $950@3%
Total = $1250
Calculate:Total cost of deposits =
54
Calculate PROFIT =
Income Statement‘Reward comes with Risk”
55Islamic Banking
Profit and LossRevenuesCost of Funds
$20m ($9.80m)$10m ($6.85)
Gross Profit $10m ($2.95m)OverheadsProvisions for NPFProfit Equalization Reserve
$3m$2m$1m
Profit Before Tax and Zakat
$4m
Tax and Zakat $1mNet Profit $3m
Islamic Banking Performance
56
Market share in terms of asset: 17.3% Average annual growth: 20% 65% of market is concentrated on 6
players Majority are still small in size in capital
terms
Islamic Financin
g31/12/08
Al-Bai-bithaman ajil (BBA)
32.99%
Ijara Thumma Al-Bay (AITAB)30.44
Ijarah2.65%
Murabaha15.5%
57
Islamic Financin
g by purpose
Landed property22.2%
Construction2.4%
Purchase of securities
2.4%
Credit Card0.7%
Purchase of transport vehicle30.5%
Working Capital
26%
Personal Use9.4%
58
Malaysian Islamic Financial System
59
Tabung Haji
I st Islamic Bank1983
Islamic window1992
Islamic money market
Financial Sector
Master Plan2001
Islamic capital market2001
Islamic banking
Subsidiary2005
Foreign Islamic Bank
2005
MIFC2006
Bank Negara
Bill 2010
TOPIC 2SHARIAH FRAMEWORK
Alam Arwah(Primordial
Life)
Alam Rahim(Life in
Mother’s Womb)
Alam Dunya(Life in this
World)
Alam Barzakh
(Life in the Grave)
Life in the Hereafter
KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER!THE WORLDVIEW Of A THE MUSLIM CUSTOMER
AL-MITHAQ (THE PRIMODIAL COVENANT)
“When thy Lord drew forth from the Children of Adam, from their loins their descendants, and made them testify concerning themselves, (saying), “Am I not your Lord (Who cherishes and sustains you)? They said: Yea! We do testify! (This), lest ye should say on the Day of Judgement: Of this we were never mindful.” (Al-Araf: 172)
63
Man is indebted
(dyn) to God for giving
him life and sustenance
Man settle his debt with
God by submitting his desires
to the Will of God
The Will of God is the Shariah
Shariah
Aqidah(Belief)
5 Pillars of Iman (Faith)
Akhlak(Moral
conduct)Muamalat
(Transaction)
Man with Allah swt
5 Pillars of Islam
Man among Man
The Shariah
64
Objective of Shariah (Maqasid Shariah)
Protecting Public Interest
Removing the Harm
“Iba’a”
Securing the Benefit“Tahsil”
65
66
Public Interest (Maslah
a Ammah)
1. Protectio
n of Religion
(Din)
2. Protection of Life (Nafs)
3. Protectio
n of Intellect
(‘Aql)
4. Protectio
n of Family (Nasl)
5. Protectio
n of Property
(Mal)
67
Protection of Religion
(Din)
Performance of 5 daily prayers
(solat)
Protection of Life (Nafs)
Capital punishment on murder (Hadd)
Protection of the
Intellect (‘Aql)
Prohibition of consuming Intoxicants
(qimar)
Protection of Family
(Nasl)Prohibition of adultry (zina)
Protection of Wealth
(Mal)
Prohibition of riba, gamblingPermissibility
of trading (bay)
68
The Shariah serves to
protect Public Interest
(maslaha al ammah)
Shariah = Shariah rules
Some Shariah rules:
1. Prohibition of riba
2. Elimination of Gharar
3. Prohibition of Gambling
These rules are meant to:1. Prevent the
Harm2. Preserve the
benefits
Shariah Framework for Islamic Banking
69
5 Shariah Principles
1 Prohibition
of Riba“riba is profit
derived from
loans”
2.Application of Al-
Bay“work,
effort and responsibil
ity’
3.Avoidance of
Gharar in Contracts‘ambiguiti
es in prices, subject matter,
counterparties.
4.Prohibition of
Gambling (maisir)
‘outcome due to pure
chance”
5. Prohibition to engage in the
trading of impure
commodities
Maqasid of Shariah (Objective of Shariah)
70
Islamic financial products as defined by AQAD methodology, should contain more benefits (masalih) and less or no harm (madarah).
“ in gambling (maisir) and liqour (qimar), there are some sins and some profits. But the sins are greater than the profits” (Al-Baqarah: 216).
MudaratSins
ManfaatProfits
“ in Gambling (maisir) and Liqour (qimar), there are some sins and some profits. But the sins are greater than the profits” (Al-Baqarah: 216).
Gambling & Liqour
71
Mudarat
Manfaat
#1 NO Riba!72
Aqidah Viewpoint: Trade and Riba
73
“Allah has allowed trade but prohibits riba”. Explain the verse in the light of risk magement.
Main lesson: Rejecting love for money, which is one form of Hubbul Dunya. The believer must only love Allah swt since He is the Creator and Sustainer of life.
In riba, money will always appreciate. Principle + interest = appreciation.
In trade (al-bay’), money is converted into capital. Capital is used to buy merchandize or underlying assets
Business capital can increase, decrease or remains the same over time due to risk-taking. Risk is potential loss. Capital is subject to market volatility.
Because there is no love for money but only God, money must be allowed to appreciate and depreciate, leading to gain or loss.
Fiqh Viewpoint Contract of Qard with upfront/contractual
increase is invalid.1. Agent of contract: Lender and borrower2. Objective of contract: Exchange of
equivalents3. Subject matter: i. currency/moneyii. Price = 04. Ijab and Qabul
74
‘IWAD(Equivalent countervalue)
RISK(Ghurmi)
WORK & EFFORT
(Kasb)
LIABILITY(Daman)
PROFIT =
RIBA: ECONOMIC VIEWPOINT
1.Al-Bay’2.Al-Ijarah
3.Salam4.Istisna’
5.Mudarabah6. Musyarakah
75
#2 TRADING!
Profit from Trading76
Profit from
Trading(al-Bay)
Capital at Risk
Value-addition
Responsibility
3 basic reasons77
Prohibition of Riba
(Usulfiqh)
Fiqh Viewpoi
nt
(Usulludin)
Aqidah Viewpoi
nt
Economic
viewpoint
Riba in Loan78
$Riba1.An upfront and fixed
increase on a loan2. Fixed by the lender.
3. Contractual in nature
Islamic loan79
$Increase on Islamic
loan
1.An increase on a loan known only at maturity2. Fixed by the debtor3. Voluntary in nature
Mudarat
Manfaat
Al-Bay
80
Mudarat > Manfaat
HARAM
81
Mudarat < Manfaat
HALAL
82
#3 NO GHARAR!1.Gharar (ambiguities) must be avoided in contracts2. Gharar will invite legal disputes leading to injury and loss of well-being83
Pillars of
Contract
(‘AQD)
1. Buyer and Seller(Rational and well-informed)
Subject matter
(posesion and
ownership)
Offer and Acceptanc
e(negotiatio
n)
Price(must be
set upfront)
#4 No Gambling!84
Profit in Islam is derived from risk, work and responsibility.
Profit from gambling (maisir) is
derived from game of chance
TOPIC 3REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Basel 2, IFSB, AAOIFI, Central Banking
Bank regulations are a form of government regulation which subject banks to certain requirements, restrictions and guidelines.
Financial instability hypothesis - Regulation/Government intervention is inevitable as the financial sector is “inherently unstable”. Instability arising from “internal factors”.
Efficient market hypothesis – market is inherently stable, thus the market does not need government interference. Instability arises from “external factors”.
86
87
Banking Regulati
on
Prudential –
protection of
depositors
Systemic risk
reduction
Avoid misuse of
banks
Credit allocation
Objectives of Regulation
Islamic Banking Regulations88 Shariah
Framework
Fiqh Academy Mekah
AAOIFI, Bahrain
Bank Negara Shariah
Supervisory Board,
Malaysia
Regulatory
FrameworkBasel II
Islamic Financial
Service Board (IFSB)
Bank Negara Malaysia
Islamic Banking Regulations89 Shariah
Framework
Fiqh Academy Mekah
AAOIFI, Bahrain
Bank Negara Shariah
Supervisory Board,
Malaysia
Regulatory
FrameworkBasel II
Islamic Financial
Service Board (IFSB)
Bank Negara Malaysia
Islamic Banking Regulations90 Shariah
Framework
Fiqh Academy Mekah
AAOIFI, Bahrain
Bank Negara Shariah
Supervisory Board,
Malaysia
Regulatory
FrameworkBasel II
Islamic Financial
Service Board (IFSB)
Bank Negara Malaysia
Islamic Banking Law91
Islamic
Banking
Act (IBA)1
983“Islamic bank” means any
company which carries on Islamic banking business and holds a valid
license; and all the offices and branches of such a bank shall be
deemed to be a bank”
“Islamic banking business” means banking business who aims and operations do not
involve any element which is not allowed by the Religion of Islam”
Islamic Banking Act 198392
4. Restriction on Business
2. Financial requirement and duties of Islamic
banks
3. Ownership, control and management of
Islamic banks
5. Powers of supervision and control
over Islamic banks
1. Licensing of Islamic
banks
Islamic Banking Under IBA 1983
93 Financing
FinancingMortgage
Hire-PurchasePersonal, enterprise
,
Leasing
Venture capital
Property
Deposit
Saving
PSIA
Private Equity
Asset LiabilitiesFinancing Wadiah
Dhamanah Savings
Operational Leasing
PSIA
JV
Stocks
Sukuks Capital
MORE OUTPUT IN THE BANKING BOOK
Conventional to Islamic94
Asset Liability
Mortgage Saving
Hire-Purchase PSIA
Personal
Sukuks
Asset LiabilitiesFinancingMortgageHPPersonal
Wadiah Dhamanah Savings
Operational Leasing
PSIA
JV
Stocks
Sukuks
IBA 1983: No Wall between Commercial andInvestment bankingIslamic Banking and BAFIA 1989
Universal Banking: Economies of Scale and Scope
95
More Outputs
Less Cost per Unit
Higher Profits
Shariah Advisory Board96
Islamic Banking Act 1983 on Shariahadvisory body
“that there is in the article of association of the bank concerned, provision for the establishment of a Syariah advisory body to advise the bank in the operation of its banking business in order to ensure that they do not involve any element which is not approved by the Religion of Islam”
Commercial banking
Investment banking
Fund managem
entJoint -
ventureIslamic banking
Islamic Banking Act 1983Bank Negara Bill 2010
97
Role of Shariah Supervisory Board
98
To study fatwas previously
issued by SSB of member banks and how these fatwas conform
to Shariah rulings
Supervise activities of
member banks to ensure they
are in conformity with Shariah
rulings
To issue fatwas (religious legal opinions) on
financial products and
banking operations
Shariah Product Auditing
Role of Shariah Supervisory Board
99
Accounting policy adopted by banks
Determination of profit-sharing ratio between
banks and clients
Determining the calculation and
payments of zakat
Determining the income distributed and expenses to be borne by depositors
Others Duties
IFSB Guiding Principles on Shariah GovernanceIndependence of Shariah Board
100
No individual or group of individuals shall be allowed to dominate the Shariah board’s
decision-making
The Shariah Board should play a strong role and independent oversight role, with
adequate capability to exercise objective
judgement on Shariah related matters.
BNM Guidelines on Shariah Supervisory 2010
Shariah Compliance
Shariah Framework
101
IMPACT OF BASEL II ON ISLAMIC BANKING CAPITAL REQUIREMENT
103
Bank is required to back-up loans with some capital.
If CAR = 8%, it means for every $100 loan given out, it must be supported by $8 of bank’s capital.
CAR = Capital / Risk-Weight Assets
Conventional Bank Under Basel 2104 Assets Amount Riskweights
RWassetsLoans $600m 50% $300Hire-Purchase $300m 50% $150Personal Loans $200m 100% $200Bond $100m 50% $ 50TOTAL $1200 $700
Capital ratio = (Regulated Capital / RWA)8% = RC / $700RWA = [($600m x 0.5) + ($300m x 0.5) + ($200m x 1.00) + ($100 x 0.5)] = $300m + $150m +$200m + $50m = $700
RC = $700 x 0.08 = $56mNote Risk weight also known as conversion factor.
Islamic Bank Under Basel 2: Higher Capital Requirement
105 Assets Amount Riskweights RWassetsMurabaha $600m 50% $300AITAB $300m 50% $150Personal F $200m 100% $200Sukuk $100m 50% $ 50 TOTAL $1200 $700
Capital ratio = (Regulated Capital / RWA)8% = RC / $700RWA = [($600m x 0.5) + ($300m x 0.5) + ($200m x 1.00) + ($100 x 0.5)] = $300m + $150m +$200m + $50m = $700
RC = $700 x 0.08 = $56mNote Risk weight also known as conversion factor.
106
Bank intends to give a $200,000 BBA facility to Ali.
How much capital it require to hold given that RW on the facility is 50%.
0.08 = x / RWA 0.08 = x / $200,000 x 0.5 = x /$100,000 X = $8,000.
Islamic Bank with Musharakah financing under Basel 2: Higher Capital Requirement
107 Assets Amount Riskweights RWassetsMurabaha $500m 50% $250AITAB $300m 50% $150Personal F $200m 100% $200Sukuk $100m 50% $ 50Musharakah $100m 250% $250TOTAL $1200 $900
Capital ratio = (Regulated Capital / RWA)8% = RC / $900RWA = [($500m x 0.5) + ($300m x 0.5) + ($200m x 1.00) + ($100 x 0.5) + ($100 x 2.5)] = $250m + $150m +$200m + $70m + $250 = $900
RC = $900 x 0.08 = $72.00mNote Risk weight also known as conversion factor.
Stress on Islamic bank capital
108
Since the risk-weight for Musharakah is 250%, the bank is charged higher capital from $56m to $78m. The bank has to come up with $22m more capital to meet regulator’s requirement in order to undertake the Musharakah project.
In this sense, the Musharakah project places stress of Islamic bank capital.
Basel II assumes that Islamic deposits are similar with conventional deposits.
In conventional deposits, the deposits and interest income are guaranteed.
This is not the case for Islamic deposits since they are based on profit-sharing system. In this manner, the bank need not provide capital guarantees.
Islamic Banking under Basel II/IFSB
Murabaha without title
Murabaha with title Ijara Financing lease Ijara Operating lease Musharakah Salam Istisna Tawaruq
50% 150% 50% 100% 150% 100% - 150% 100%- 150% 100%
Islamic Products Risk-weights
109
TOPIC 4LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Legal Framework111
TaxTax
Neutrality
Tax on leasing,
murabahah, assets
LawContract
Documentation
Litigation
Tax implication: Shariah and Civil Law
A true sale will trigger a tax claim by the government. Murabaha – stamp duties Ijara – stamp duties Tax neutrality 1. PPA2. PSA Since PPA and PSA is not a true sale it is easy to exempt it from
tax, thus a case of tax neutrality on Islamic financing. But the S & P agreement is still subject to tax since the sale is
a true one. When an Islamic bank purchases an asset (say, property) from
a developer, it will have to pay tax or stamp duties to the government.
Stamp duty: Tax implication Stamp duty tax is one of the important
property taxes applicable within the country. For comparison, the stamp duties in Malaysia within the year 2007 and 2008 are given below.
Price Stamp Stamp Duty in 2007 Stamp Duty in 2008RM250, 000 RM4, 500 RM2, 250 (-50%)RM150, 000 RM2, 000 RM1, 000 (-50%)RM350, 000 RM6, 000 RM6, 000 (unchanged)
Based on the current rate of 1% for first RM100,000 and 2% for RM100,001 to RM1,000,000)This situation is prompting property developers to provide more properties at below the price of RM250,000 in order to entice buyers. However, new home buyers face two main Stamp Duties: for title transfer and the bank loan facility agreement.
• Financial Distress• Default
Credit risk
• Litigation• Civil Court
hearingForeclos
ure• Invalid contract• Improper
documentationShariah
risk
114
Legal Framework: The Judiciary and Court of Law
• Bank carries higher capital charge
• Bank carries higher tax burden• Bank to carry new risk ie.
business risk due to the holding of inventories + credit risk + market risk + operational risk
True Sale
• No extra capital charge
• No new tax implication
• Bank only faces credit risk + market risk + operational risk
Fictitious sale
FICTITIOUS SALE : Sale without title transfer.Bay’ al-enah
Bank Customer
1) Sells asset X to customer for RM15,000
2) InstallmentPayments@ RM250
((4) Cash payments RM10,000
COF = RM10,000Profit rate per al
(1) Bank Sells asset $10,000 + profit margin = $12,000
(2) Customer pays byEqual instalment over 5Years = $12,000/60 = $200
(3) Customer sells asset To Bank for $10,000
(4) Bank pays cash $10,000To Customer
Fictitious Sale Loan
Convergence
True Sale
Fictitious Sale
Divergence!
Promotion and Defence of Fictitious
Sale
Helps avoid capital charges + new tax
burden + risk-taking business
Islamic bank can run a business based on
the lending –borrowing model
Less need to change risk-appetite
behaviour of bank’s stakeholders.
Protection of Deposits and
Financial Stability are Guaranteed
1st Arguement
Promotion and Defence of Fictitious
Sale
Helps avoid capital charges + new tax
burden + risk-taking business
Islamic bank can run a business based on
the lending –borrowing model
Less need to change risk-appetite
behaviour of bank’s stakeholders.
Intent of the Law (Maqasid Shariah) in
riba prohibition is not met
2nd Arguement
True Sale
1. Higher Capital Charges
2. New tax burden
3. Carries new risk –
business risk
Impact on:1. Pricing of
Islamic instruments2. Return on
Equity
Banking Infrastruc
ture
Shariah Framewrok
Regulatory Framework I
Regulatory Framework II
Legal Framework I
Legal Framework II
Legal Framework III
True Sale
Bank purchases Asset from Vendor as cash price (lower
price)Bank sells asset to
Customer at credit price (higher price)
Higher Risk-Weights
Islamic bank to hold additional capital
Pay Stamp-Duties
No tax neutrality
Civil Court determines sale character based on legal documentation drawn by solicitor – Title transfer
Non-bona fide sale
Bank purchases asset from Customer at lower price and sells it back at higher price.
Risk-weight equal to risk-weight of loans
Islamic bank holds same amount of capital
No Stamp-duties
Tax neutrality
Civil Court determines sale character based on legal documentation drawn by solicitor - no title transfer
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
Islamic Banking
124
125
FinancingPRODUCT
Home-financingAuto-financing
Personal financingTrade financing
Credit card
CONTRACTBai-bithaman Ajil
Al-Ijarah Thumma Al-bayBay’ al-’inahWakalah LC
Murabahah LCKafalah LG
Islamic accepted bills.
Bay’ al-’inah
Islamic Banking = Equity + Efficiency 126
ISLAMIC BANKINGFINANCING OPERATIONS
ASSET-BASED FEE-BASED
Murabaha(deferred sale)
Ijara(leasing)
Istisna’(sale by order)
Kafalah(guarantee)
PROFIT-SHARING
Qirad/Musharaka(partnership)
Wakalah(Agency)
TOPIC 5DEPOSITS
Transaction and Investment Deposits
Basel III – Back to Basics
Take Deposi
tOrigina
te Hold
Funding needs – Back to Basics
CORE FUNDINGDeposits
(Financing/Deposit) Ratio
NON-CORE FUNDINGInterbank
Market
Funding
Subprime Crises, Northern Rock etc
CORE FUNDINGDeposits
(Financing/Deposit)
Ratio
NON-CORE FUNDINGInterbank Market
Funding
131
Islamic DepositsProfit-Sharing/Mudarabah Investment
Account (PSIA)
General Specific
Transaction Deposits
(Safe-Custody with Guarantee)Wadiah Dhaman
ah Current Account
Wadiah Dhaman
ahSavings Account
Money Market Deposits
Commodity
Murabaha
Negotiable
Islamic Certifica
tes of Deposits
Transactional Deposits132
Current Accoun
t
Wadiah Yad
Dhamanah
SavingsAccoun
t
Wadiah Yad
Dhamanah
Product Contract
Investment Deposits133
General Investm
ent Account
Mudarabah
Specific Investm
ent Account
Mudarabah
Product Contract
Money Market Deposits134
Negotiable
Islamic certificat
e of Deposit
Bay al-Dayn
(Sale of Debt)
Commodity
Murabaha
Tawaruq
Product Contract
Wadiah Dhamanah Deposits135
Deposits
$5,0001/8/09
0Deposit
s$5,00015/8/09
1. Islamic bank acts a custodian and guarantees full withdrawal/capital protection with acondition that depositors allow the bank to use the fund in its financingoperations. No fee charges on the safe-custodial service.
2. Bank does not give any fixed return on the deposits.3. Bank may give an extra over the deposits based on the principle of gift (hibah/hadiah).
Hibah is not contractual but voluntary136
$5,0001/8/09
$5(Hibah)
$500515/8/09
Hibah is not fixed upfront137
Hibah
10%
0%5%
Tagging deposits financing138
BBA
Transaction Deposits(Current
and Savings Account)
Joint Venture
FinancingMudarabah
Deposits
139
Mudarabah
RabulMal(Depositors)
Contributes
Capital
Mudarib(Bank)
Contributes
Skill and Expertise
Project
Al-Mudarabah Investment 1. No guarantee on deposits2. No guarantee on returns3. Flexible rate liability
Placement of deposits using the principle of Al-Mudarabah (trustee partnership)
140
Bank - Mudarib(value added)
DepositorsRabulmal(Capital)
Al-MudarabahProject
Profits (iLossf any)- distributed accordingto PLS ratio
Loss (if any)- capital depreciation Total liability on depositorsValue added not compensated
Profit Loss
Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) Guidelines on Profit-Sharing Investment Account (PSIA) with risk absorbent
141
In order to highlight the more accurate nature of mudarabah deposits (PSIA) and its impact on bank capital, BNM has provided a new formulation for determining regulated for Islamic banks.
PSIA will be used to finance a relatively more risky projects based on mudarabah, istisna and musharakah contracts.
The formulation capital adequacy ratio (CAR) = Capital/ (RWA less (1-α)RWA funded by PSIA less (α)RWA in the form of PER)
When α = 1, the bank holds all risks in the balance sheet. When α is say 30%, the bank carry risks only from wadiah
dhamanah deposits and general mudarabah deposits. Then 70% of the risks (1-α) = (1-0.3), is carried by PSIA deposits. Then CAR will be less than CAR without α as a risk-absorbent
factor. This will reduce stress on Islamic banking capital. Hence, the smaller the α i.e. the more risks carried by PSIA, the
lower is the CAR.
Modified Formula Incorporating the Risk nature of Mudarabah Deposits
142
RWCAR Islamic = [Capital Base] /[(TRWAIslamic) Less (1-) (Credit and Market Risk
Weighted Asset funded by PSIA) Less ()(proportional of Credit
and Market Risk Weighted Assets funded by PSIA in the form of PER)]
Islamic Bank with Musharakah financing under Basel 2: Higher Capital Requirement
143
Assets Amount Riskweights RWassetsMurabaha $500m 50% $250AITAB $300m 50% $150Personal F $200m 100% $200Sukuk $100m 50% $ 50Musharakah $100m 250% $250TOTAL $1200 $900
Capital ratio = (Regulated Capital /( RWA – [1-α]RWA funded by PSIA –[α] RWA funded by PSIA as PER)
1.α= 30%2.(1-α) = 70%3.RWA funded by PSIA = $250m (musharaka)4.RWA as PER = $2m (by assumption)
RWA = [($500m x 0.5) + ($300m x 0.5) + ($200m x 1.00) + ($100 x 0.5) + ($100 x 2.5)] = [$250m + $150m +$200m + $70m + $250] - (0.7)($250) – (0.3)($2) = $900m - $175m - $0.6m = $724.4m
RC = $724.4 x 0.08 = $57.95m
Note Risk weight also known as conversion factor.PER = Profit Equalization Reserve.
144
(1-) represents the quantum of PSIA recognized as a risk absorbent for RWCR computation purposes and approved by Bank Negara Malaysia.
= 1 means all risks carried by bank = 0 means all risks carried by PSIA.The smaller the , the lower is RWCR.
Money market placement: Commodity Murabaha
Islamic Liquidity Center (ILC)
Surplus Bank (SB)Broker A
Broker B
Sells X $10.5mmurabaha
Pays $10.5m at maturity
Pays cash $10m
Buys X
Sells X
Pays Cash $10m
Commodity Murabaha SB to place excess funds with ILH in return for fixed income
and protected deposit. How? SB purchases commodity (eg palm oil) from Supplier A via
broker A at $10m. SB sells the commodity to ILH. ILH will pay on credit in 6
months at $11m. This is a 6-month facility placement. ILH sells the commodity to Supplier B via Broker B and
obtain cash. Cash will be invested in ILH financing operations.
ROI of the $10m varies. Assume that the ROI = 20%. Thus ILH secures $10m x 0.2 = $2m profit.
At maturity ILH pays SB $11 million with net margin for SB and ILH respectively = $1m.
Brokers’ charges: Commodity Murabaha Deposit
147
Deposit = $20 million Agent’s Fee (AF) = 25 basis points $20,000,000 x 0.025 = $500,000 Broker’s fees (BF) = $50 per $1 million
transaction$50 x 20 = $1000 Depositor will received net of AF and BF.
TOPIC 6FINANCING OPERATIONSProducts and Contracts
Retail Products149
Home Financin
g
Al-Bai-bithama
n Ajil(BBA)
Car Financin
g
Ijarah Thuma Al-bay (AITAB)
Product Contract
Retail Products150
Personal
Financing
Bay al-enah
Credit card
Bay al-enah
PRODUCT CONTRACT
Enterprise Financing151
Letter of CreditTrust
Receipt
WakalahMurabah
a
Overdraft
Bay al-enah
PRODUCT CONTRACT
Enterprise Financing152
Joint venture
Musharakah
Sale by Order
IstisnaSalam
PRODUCT CONTRACT
HOME BBA FINANCING :
Plain BBA154
Developer
Customer
Bank
Bank buys directly from Developer on cash basis
Customer pays Bank on deferredpayment basis.
$
Transferownership
Bank Sells assetTo Customer
1
2
BBA as applied in Banks155
Developer Customer
Bank
S & P
PPAPSA
Customer Pays down payment
11
2
3BankSellsAsset to Customer
Customerpaysby installment
CustomerSells assetTo bank
Bank paysCustomercash
BBA Property Financing156
Price of Property = $400,000 Down-Payment = $80,000 (20%) Bank Financing = $320,000 Profit rate = r =6% Tenure = n = 20 years Profit margin = BF x r x n = $320,000 x 0.06 x
20 Selling price = BF + (BF x r x n) = $320,000 +
$384,000 = $704,000. Monthly payment = {BF + (BF x r x n)} /120 =
$5,866.
Al-Bai-bithaman Ajil Financing
157
Structure1. Risk2. Pricing – Fixed and floating rate asset3. Amortization – allocation of profit and capital Documentation1. Sale and Buyback
PPA : Property Purchase AgreementPSA: Property sale Agreement
2. Charge agreement Governing Laws1. Litigation
BBA Based on Novation Agreement
Developer
Customer
Bank
Bank buys Asset on Behalf of CustomerDeveloper to deliver asset to Bank as if theBank = Customer
Downside:
1. Developer will find it risky dealingwith Bank as Buyer. Failure to deliver onprescribed time has severe legal implicationssince the developer is dealing now with a bankand not an individual customer.
2. Bank feels uneasy since there is no bindingcomittement of Customer to purchase the property.A promise (wa’ad) may not be enough to guaranteea sale.
Customer promisesto buy property fromBank.
CAR FINANCING
Leasing
Operational Leasing
Leasing without
intention to own
Not a loan
Financing Leasing
Leasing with
intention to own
Term LoanHP Act 1967
161
Ijarah Thumma Al-Bay (AITAB)
Leasing
Bank holds beneficial ownership
Customer holds legal ownership
SaleAt maturity
Price 1. Last installment
payment2. Nominal value $1
AITAB162
Cost of Car = $40,000 Term charges = 7% per annum (flat) Tenure = 5 years Total charges = 0.07 x $40,000 x 5 = $14,000 Total rental to be collected over tenure = $40,000
+ $14,000 = $54,000 Monthly rental = $54,000/60 =$900Documentation:1. Master Ijarah agreement2. Charge agreement
PERSONAL FINANCING PRODUCTS
Islamic Personal Financing164
Bay’ al-’inah Personal Financing (Malaysia)
Al-Rahn Personal Financing At-Tawarruq Personal financing (Middle-
East)
Al-Rahn Personal FinancingIn the Hedaya, rahn literally signifies the detention of a thing (the pledge or security) on account of a claim that may be answered by means of that thing
165
Contract of Qard (loan) Contract of Al-Rahn (Mortgage) Contract of Wadiah Amanah - Safe keeping
Qardhu Hasan$4,000
Rahn$5,000
Al-Wadiah Amanah
Custodial Fee
Borrower
Islamic Pawn-
Broking(Lender)
Pledge$4,000
($4,000/$100) = 2% x 5 = $40166
Al-Rahn – Bank Rakyat167
According to Bank Rakyat, a pledge valued at less than $1,000 will cost the rahin (1,000/100) x 40 sen or $4 a month. Normally, only about half of the pledge value is given to the rahin as an interest-free loan. Thus, a $500 loan payable in 6 months will incur a storage cost of $4 x 6 = $24.
At the end of the term, the rahin will pay the murtahin $524. The rahin can ask for periodic loan extension provided he pays an additional storage fee.
On failure to pay the loan after a prolonged reminder, the operator holds the right to put the collateral on auction.. The rahn company will claim loan plus storage fees due to them. The surplus therein will be returned back to the rahin.
Custodial Fee168
Amount of Loan (Qard): $20,000 Rahn : $30,000 Service fee = 40 cents @$100 per
month Tenure = 6 months Ujrah (fee) = ($20,000 /$100) x 0.04 x 6
ISLAMIC PERSONAL FINANCINGBay’ al-enah
169
Bank Customer
COF = RM10,000Profit rate per al
(1) Bank Sells asset $10,000 + profit margin = $12,000
(2) Customer pays byEqual instalment over 5
Years = $12,000/60 = $200
(3) Customer sells asset To Bank for $10,000
(4) Bank pays cash $10,000To Customer
Tawaruq170
Bank Client
Buyer
1) Sells X
2) deferredpayments Sells
cashPays cash
FEE-BASED PRODUCTS
Trade Finan
ce
KafalahLG
MurabahaLC
WakalahLC
172
COMPONENTS OF PROFIT IN ISLAM
1. Risking his Capital 2. Putting work and effort
3. Warranty 4. Delayed Payments
Trader deserves to earn profit
174
‘IWAD(Equivalent countervalue)
RISK(Ghurmi)
WORK & EFFORT
(Kasb)
LIABILITY(Daman)
PROFIT =
ISLAMIC NORMATIVETHEORY OFPROFIT
1.Al-Bay’2.Al-Ijarah
3.Salam4.Istisna’
5.Mudarabah6. Musyarakah
175
Cash Sale and Sale by deferred payments176
1/6/09Wholesale Price = $20
5/6/09Retail Price = $25
Profit = $5 = risk + effort + liability
5/6/10Deferred price$30
CASH SALE DEFERRED SALE
Profit = $5
Profits from delayed payments
177
Profits from
Delayed Payment
s
Opportunity costs?
Inflation risk?
Others?
Default risk?
178
Profit from
Deferred Sale$10
Profit from cash price
Cost price = $10
Retail price = $15
Profit from delayed payment
Retail price = $15
Credit price = $20
Price of Sale with Deferred Payment179
• “ Price will possibly rise due to its deferred payment”(Badai’ as-Sona’i, Al-Kasani, 5/187)• “The deferment for some period of time has a value in the
price” (Bidayatul Mujtahid, Ibn Rush Al-Hafid, 2/108)
• “Five which is paid in cash is equal to six which is paid on deferred” (Al-Wajiz, (Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali, 1/85).
• “The period is part of the price” (Fatawa Ibn Taimiya, 29/499)
• “This is the evidence that the period of time in sale and purchase has its portion in the price; and it is permissible for sale and purchase contracts” (Al-Mughni, Ibn-Qudamah, 6/385)
Profit from delayed payments
180
MurabahaProfit
derived from
delayed paymentMoney
exchange for Asset
Interest-bearing
LoanProfit
derived from
delayed paymentMoney
exchange for money
Conditions on the permissibility of profits from delayed payments
181
Profit from
delayed paymen
ts
Bank must hold
ownership of asset
Price determination based consent
(negotiation) Bank
exposure to inventory
risk
Cash Price
Credit Price
Business risk
Liquidity risk?
Default risk?
Business risk
182
Murabaha/BBA Financing183
Murabaha/BBA Selling Price
$150,000
Cost Price$100,000
Profit MarginProfit rate x $Facility
x tenor10% x $100,000 x 5
years = $50,000
Murabaha Financing184
Profit Rate
Cost of Deposit Overhead
Statutory profit
margin
Risk/Default
Premium
185
Interest Rate
Risk Free rate
True Time Value of Money
Risk PremiumCredit + Liquidity
risk
TOPIC 7 RISK EXPOSURE IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Profitability vs Stability
Risks faced by Islamic banks
Bank takes position
Bank faces: 1. Credit risk2. Market risk3.Liquidity risk4. Operational and Shariah risks
Risk management1.Credit risk management2.Market risk management3.Liquidity risk management4.Operational risk management
Trade and Risk188
Allah has allowed al-bay but prohibits riba (Al-Baqarah:275)
How is risk management related to the above verse?
Risk Management189
When a bank takes a position (ie. decided to lend/to extend financing), it has an exposure.
Exposure is a loose word to describe a transaction which generates some risk. Sometimes it also refers to the amount of risk or amount subject to loss of value or the size of the commitment.
Risk Management190
• Risk is the potential loss arising from uncertainty of events, which can have a potential adverse effect, which is a possibility of loss. Uncertainty refer to the randomness of outcomes.
• Risk management is the process of identifying, measuring, controlling and pricing of the risks taken abroad.
Risk is potential loss191
Risk itself is not an evil thing Avoiding risk with zero profit is allowed –
Wadiah Yad Dhamanah deposit Avoiding risk with positive profit is not
allowed – interest from loans. Avoiding risk is an evil action if it injures
the counterparty –interest from loans
Risk Management in Islamic Banking
192
• Fundamental principle in Islamic business :
a. no reward without risk – al-ghorm bil ghonm
b. With profit comes liability – al-kharaj bil daman.
• Risk taking behaviour – as the above – risk > 0, profit > 0 permissible
• Risk avoiding behaviour – risk =0, profit >0 - not permissible
Islamic Financing193
Business Risk
Credit and Market risk,Rate of Return risk, Displaced commercial risk
Credit Financing based on True Sale (bona fide
sale) Credit risk, Market risk
Rate of return risk, Displaced commercial risk, Rate of return risk, Shariah risk.
Credit Financing based onNon-bona fide Sale
True Sale Financing System194
• Tax burden: tax on sale and purchase. Who to absorb the new transaction cost?
• Capital charge: higher capital allocation to a more risky business unit.
• Exposure to business risk (ie. asset holding/ownership prior to sale).
• Exposure to credit,market,RoR,DCR.
Business risk195
• Potential loss in the world of business due to uncertainty about:
1. Demand for products2. The price that can be charged for those
products3. The cost of producing and delivery the
products
Islamic Financing without True Sale
196
No new tax burden No additional capital charge No exposure to business risk Exposure to credit and market risk. Exposure to RoR,DCR. Exposure to Shariah risk
Risks in BBA Financing
Credit RiskLow credit scoring for
Islamic customers,
higher probability of default
(PD)
Market Risk Negative Gap
can mean losses as
Interest rate increases
Shariah Risk
Recent Court Judgement
on murabaha/BBA as
non bona fide sale
Operational Risk
Conventionalsolution/system not able to accomodate Islamic accounting principles
leading toovercharging and
undercharging customers.
High NPF and Write-Offs
Capital Depletion
Earning at risk (EAR)
Capital at risk (EAR)
Litigation CostsErosion of earnings
IncreaseOverheads
Litigation costs
197
Islamic
Banking
Risk
Credit Risk
Market Risk
Liquidity Risk
Operational Risk
Rate of Return Risk
ShariahRisk
DisplaceCommercial Risk
198
199Islamic Banking
Profit and LossRevenuesCost of Funds
$500m$200m
Gross Profit $300mOverheadsProvisions for NPFProfit Equalization Reserve
$80m$10m$5m
Profit Before Tax and Zakat
$200m
Tax and Zakat $60mNet Profit $140m
MARKET RISK
Income Gap Analysis201
Impact on income from changes in profit-rate
GAP = Rate sensitive assets (RSA) – Rate sensitive liabilities (RSL)
Change in income = GAP x (change in profit rate)
Deposits202
Wadiah DhamanahMudarabah PSIA
Variable Rate Deposits
Commodity MurabahaNICD Fixed rate Deposits
Capital
Financing203
MusharakahMudarabah
Variabale Rate Assets
BBAAITAB Fixed Rate Assets
Capital
Islamic Banking Realities:Negative Gap Asset-LiabilityRSA < RSL
204
Fixed Rate Assets
Fixed Rate Deposits
Variable Rate Assets(RSA)
Variable Rate Deposits
(RSL)
Income Gap Analysis Fixed rate asset
(FRA)1. BBA(F)2. AITAB3. Tawaruq PF Flexible rate
asset (VRA or RSA)
1. Mudarabah2. Musharakah3. BBA(V)
Fixed rate liabilities (FRL)
1. CMD (Commodity Murabaha)
2. NICD Variable rate
liabilities (VRL or RSL)
1. WAD2. PSIA3. INI
205
Salam Bank Balance SheetAssetBBA
$700mAITAB
$400mTawaruq PF $100mMudarabah $ 50mFixed Asset $
100m
LiabilityWadiah Dhamanah
$200mPSIA $800mCMD $250m
Capital $100m
206
GAP = $50m - $1000m = -$950m
FRA1. BBA $700m2.AITAB $400m3. Tawaruq $100m Total $1200mRSA1. Mudarabah $50mGAP = -$950If profit rate decreases
by 1%, then net income will increase by (-$950m x 0.01) = $9.5m
RSL1. WAD $200m2. PSIA $800m
Total $1000mRSL 3. WAD & PSIA $1000GAP = -$950If profit rate increases
by 1%, then net income will fall by (-$950m x 0.01) = $9.5m.
207
Risks peculiar to Islamic banks
208
• Potential loss arising from loss of deposits• Gap/Asset-Liability Mismatches• Rate of Islamic deposits < deposit interest rate• Rd < id• Actual rate of return < indicated/expected rate of return
Rate of Return Risk
• Potential loss that occurs when Shareholders’ Funds are utilized to “smoothen” rate of return on Islamic deposits.
Displacement
Commercial Risk
• Amount appropriated out of total income to main an acceptable level of return on Islamic deposits.
• Serve to smoothen return on Islamic deposits (RoID).• Increase PER provisions when RoID not competitive.
Profit Equalization
Reserve
Implication of Negative Gap: Example:209
Profit = ($100m x 0.07) – ($100 x 0.03)= $7m - $3m = $4m
When market interest rates go up, what can happen to the bank?
The bank cannot raise then profit rate to accommodate prevailing cost of fund. If it does, the murabaha contract turns invalid.
The bank will lose deposits when Islamic deposit rate (IDR)< conventional interest rates (CII).
When it losses deposits and forced to acquire money market funds at a higher cost, the bank earning drops. This is known as the Displaced Commercial Risk (DCR).
To mitigate DCR, the Profit Equalization Reserve (PER) was instituted.
PER serves to fill the gap between IDR and CII. Or the expcted rate of return and the realized rate of return.
Increase in interest rates
Loss of income to Islamic banks
1996-1997 Asian Financial Crises2010 onwards….rising interest rates
210
Fall in interest rates
Increase in income for Islamic Banks
Low interest-rate environment 2004-2009
211
Lack of LiquidityHIGH
INTENSITY OF FIXED-RATE PRODUCT
RSA<RSL -Income Gap Fall in bank earnings
rd < idMigration of
deposits from IB to CB
Deposit shortfall
Acquire funds from money
market
Further drop in bank’s earning
Bank subsidizes
Islamic depositors
such that rd = id
Displaced commercial
risk
Mitigating Market risk: Floating rate Murabaha/BBA
213
Set AQAD profit rate based on future/projected/forecasted rate, say =12%
Current rate of profit = 8% Monthly installment based on future rate = $2,000 Monthly installment based on current/mark-to
market rate = $1,200. Rebate = $800. If rate rises to 9%, monthly installment = $1,300.
Rebate is less = $700 (ie. $2,000 - $1,300) As profit rate increases due to higher cost of
funds, rebate decreases.
CREDIT RISK
Banks as Risk-Takers Banks take money from depositors and extent financing to
clients. In conventional system, a bank takes deposits and make
loans. A bank can charge a very high rate to a very risky borrower
but it may suffer high losses when the borrower defaulted. Credit risk is higher when the bank becomes an
aggressive risk-taker. It charges high credit risk premiums and hopes that the customer will not default.
Deposit fund will be in danger when bank gives loan or extends financing to clients with low creditworthiness.
But to play safe, by giving loans to clients with high creditworthiness will mean small margins and if a default occurs, it will wipe out bank’s entire profit.
Hence banks must seek strategies to minimize their risk exposures through diversification.
Credit risk and DefaultProducts
Murabaha Ijara Salam/Istisna
Failure
To repay the installments
To pay rentals To deliver goods
at the delivery date
Credit risk
• Credit risk is the risk that a change in the credit quality of a counterparty will affect the value of a security or portfolio.
• When counterparty defaults, the bank loses either all of the market value of the position or, the part of the value that it cannot recover.
a. Expected loss (EL)– covered by provisions
b. Unexpected loss(UL) – covered by capital
Credit Risk Loss
Expected Loss
(Covered by bank’s provisions)
Unexpected Loss
(Covered by capital)
Total Loss
Loss due
Credit Risk
Rising Non-
Performing
Financing
Reduce Earning
s
Capital Depletio
nBank
Failure
Financial
Instability
• Very good• Good• Satisfactory• Sufficient• Insufficient
Ratings
• Low• Below average• Average• Above average• High
Risk Value
s
• 1• 2• 3• 4• 5
Grades
Qualitative Method: Credit Risk Assessment
Qualitative Characters
Assessment
Default Age Education level Years with current employer Household income Debt to income Credit card debt Other debt
Microeconomic Analysis of default Default = f (Age, education level, years with current employer, years
at current address, household income, debt to income, credit card debt, other debt)
Y = b0 + b1X1 + b2X2 + b3X3 + b4X4 + b5X5 + b6X5 + b7X7 + b8x8Relationship between dependent and independent variablesb1:b2:b3:b4:b5:b6:b7:b8:
Macroeconomic Analysis of Default NPL = f(level of interest rates, GDP,
inflation rate, exchange rate, export, import)
NPL = b0 + b1I + b2Y + b3IFL + b4FOREX + b5X + b6M
Total Loss
Expected Loss
Largely due to
unsystematic risk
Unexpected Loss
Largely due to
systematic risk
Credit Risk in BBA• The risk of the facility is characterized
by:1. The external and /or internal rating
attributed to each obligor, usually mapped to probability of default (PD).
2. The loss rate given default (LGD) and EAGD of the facilities. LGD is the loss rate when the borrower defaults.
Credit Risk1. Exposure at given default (EAGD) :
notional value of a loan, or exposure for loan commitment. Amount of credit outstanding at the time of default.
The expected loss (EL) for each credit facility:
EL = PD x EAGD x LGD
Credit risk inn BBA• Expected loss (EL) is the basis for the calculation of the
bank’s allowance for BBA losses, which should be sufficient to absorb both specific and general credit related losses.
• EL can be viewed as cost of doing business. That is, on average, the bank will incur a credit loss amounting to EL.
• However ACTUAL credit losses may be higher or lower than EL.
• The variation for credit losses beyond EL is called unexpected loss (UL).
• UL is the basis for the calculation of economic and regulatory capital.
Example: Expected Loss Zahidi Bank hold a $500 million BBA
portfolio with 15 years tenor. PD of the portfolio = 10% BBA defaulted after 5 years Exposure at given default (EAGD) =
$400 Collateral $300m
Credit Risk Loss rate given default = (EAGD –
collateral)/EAGD = ($400m - $300m)/$400m =
($100/$400) x 100% = 25% EL= PD x EAGD x LGD EL = 0.1 x $400m x 0.25 = $10 million Bank will put aside $10 million for NPF
provisioning.
Origination PD = 10%
Default Maturity
EAGD = $400m
BBA PORTFOLIO = $500m
EXPECTED LOSS = PD x EAGD x LGD
Expected Loss is covered by Bank’s Provisioning
General and
Specific Provisions
Expected Loss (EL)
Probability of Default
(PD)
Loss Rate Given
Default (LRGD)
Exposure at Given Default (EAGD)
Assessing credit exposure Compute EL Compute UL Determine the volatility of expected loss
of a BBA to the whole portfolio. Calculate the probability distribution of
credit loss for the portfolio and asses the capital required to absorb the unexpected losses.
Credit Risk Valuation When a customer defaulted on his debt obligation,
the bank will incur a loss. The first type of loss is known as expected loss (EL)
which is a loss that bank expect to make as part of doing the credit business and are covered by reserves and income.
The second type of loss is called Unexpected loss (UL) which is a loss to the bank as a result of unexpected events except the catastrophic ones and are covered by the economic capital.
Actual level of credit loss in any one period could be significantly higher than the expected level.
Credit Risk Valuation How to estimate Expected Loss (EL) and
Unexpected Loss (UL).EL = PD x EAGD x LGDPD = probability of default (in %)EAGD = Exposure at given default (in
$values)LGD = Loss rate given default (in %)
Probability of default (PD) The PD is the likelihood that the
counterparty will be unable to comply with his/her debt obligation.
Estimating PD PD is the percentage of the contracts that were
defaulted in relation to the total portfolio of contracts during the period of one year.
PD = (DCt/TC) x 100DCt = the number of default contracts during the
period t under examinationTC = total number of contracts of the examined class.Default is the inability of the debtors to pay a
substantial portion of the lend capital for a predefined set of period such as three months or 90 days.
Exposure at Default (EAGD) EAGD is the estimation of the
institution’s exposure in the event of, and at the time of, counterparty defaults
Loss Rate Given Default (LGD) LRGD is the weighting of the loss when a
default occurs. LRGD is the ratio of losses to exposure at
default (EAGD). An important parameter to estimate LGD is the
estimation of recovery rate (RR). RR = [(recovery from cash payment + recovery
from collateral – administrative cost)/(1-variation in market value) divided by EAGD] x 100.
LGD = 1 - RR LGD = Charge Offs (Net of Recovery)
/Outstanding Balance at Default (ie EAD)
Loss Rate Given Default (LGD) LGD parameter increases in value in
relation to the collateral asset. If asset is not backed by a collateral
asset, the LGD will be high If asset is backed by a collateral asset,
the LGD will be lower
Credit Risk: EL & ULSuppose Salam Bank has portfolio of 5 murabaha customers with given EAD (Exposure at default), LGD (Loss Given Default) and (PD) Probability of Default. Suppose the said figures for the first customer is are as given below -EAD = 100,000, LGD = 0.45 and PD = 0.10. Then the loss is 100,000 * 0.45 = 45,000. ie EAD x LGD Expected loss for this customer is EL = 45,000*0.10 = 4,500 ie Loss x 0.1 Or EL = PD x EAD x LGD = 0.1 x 45,000 x 0.01 = 4,500Calculate the unexpected loss (UL) for each murabaha facility? Suppose bank data is as given below :Customer EAD LGD PD
1 100,000 0.45 0.10 2 150,000 0.45 0.10 3 300,000 0.45 0.05 4 500,000 0.45 0.01
5 400,000 0.45 0.1
Unexpected Loss Unexpected loss = Loss that is not budgeted for
(expected) and is absorbed by an attributed amount of economic capital.
Unexpected loss=
0.1 (1-0.1) x 45,000 x 0.1 = 0.3 x 45,000 x 0.1 = $1,350
P (1-P) x EAD x LGD
242
Loss Distribution due to Credit Risk - Expected and Unexpected Loss
Expected Loss: the mean loss due to a specific event or combination of events over a specified period
Unexpected Loss: loss that is not budgeted for (expected) and is absorbed by an attributed amount of economic capital
Losses so remote that capital is not provided
to cover them.
1,000Expected Loss,
Reserves
Economic Capital =Difference 3,000
0Total Loss
incurred at x% confidence
level
Determined by confidence level associated with targeted rating
Prob
abili
ty
Cost
4,000
EL UL
This is done by Screening Monitoring & enforcing restrictive covenants
Establishment of long term customer relationships
Loan commitmentSpecialized lendingCollateral and compensating balance requirements
Credit rationing
Credit Risk Management
Islamic securitization
Asset-Backed Securitization(True Sale via
SPV)
Securitization of Financial
Assets
Securitization of Physical
Asset
Asset-Based Securitization
Bay Al-Enah Securitization(No true sale,
no SPV)
Securitization of Debt
LIQUIDITY RISK
Excess Liquidity - Liquid Assets financed by High-Cost Deposits
Liquid Assets
Inter-bank Short-term
placements
Short-term
government
securities
Cash
Underutilization of scarce resources: Excess Liquidity in Islamic Banks. Why?
Shariah Compliant
Issues
• DISPLACEMENT EFFECT
• enah and tawaruq products displacing risk-taking and equity-based products
IB risk-adverse appetite towards
risk-taking
• GREENFIELDS• True-sale
murabaha• Salam & Istisna
IB adverse risk-
appetite towards
risk-sharing
• GREENFIELDS• Musharakah• Mudarabah
EXCESS LIQUIDITY – Lack of products
Excess Liquidity
Islamic bank with less
diversified portfolio
Less instrument to do business –
highly dependence on
credit based financing
Excess liquidity
Sukuk/IPDS market to
mopped up excess cash balances in
Islamic banks
Reduces excess liquidity in
Islamic banks
Lack of LiquidityHIGH
INTENSITY OF FIXED-RATE PRODUCT
RSA<RSL -Income Gap Fall in bank earnings
rd < idMigration of
deposits from IB to CB
Deposit
shortfall
Acquire funds from money
market
Further drop in bank’s earning
Bank subsidizes
Islamic depositors
such that rd = id
Displaced commercial
risk
Lack of Liquidity Islamic banks with high dependence on fixed rate assets
(FRA) will face –income gap. When interest rate increases, bank’s earning will fall and bank can’t keep up with conventional deposits rates. Rate of return on Islamic deposits (rd) is now lower than interest rate on deposits (id). When rd < id, outflow of Islamic deposits triggers asset-liability mismatches with Financing/Deposits ratio > 1. To match the balance sheet, Islamic bank is forced to use money market funds at a higher cost which further depresses bank’s earning. To deter further outflow of Islamic deposits, Islamic bank must ensure that rd = id, which means giving Islamic depositors more that they deserved. This is done by using bank’s own reserves. By doing so, the bank faces displaced commercial risk (DCR). The reserves or capital that the bank uses can support financing operation bearing potential income.
US Subprime Crises Credit CrunchLack of Liquidity
Money Market Funds
Originate
Distribute
Asset Liquidity
RiskUnable to execute transactions at the
prevailing market price because there is no
market appetite for the product.
Inability to dispose of the asset due to Shariah
issues such as prohibitions of bay al-dayn (sale of debt) at
discount.
Deposit Liquidity
RiskOverdependence on Corporate Deposits .
Overall cost of deposits increases since corporate
deposits usually command higher rate of
deposits on GIA.
When an Islamic bank is overly dependent on corporate deposits,
withdrawals at maturities will create adverse asset-liability mismatches. Cost overrun when the bank acquires funds
from more costly money market sources such as Negotiable Islamic instruments
(NII).
LIQUIDITY RISK
Asset Liquidity
RiskUnable to execute transactions at the
prevailing market price because there is no
market appetite for the product.
Inability to dispose of the asset due to Shariah
issues such as prohibitions of bay al-dayn (sale of debt) at
discount.
Deposit Liquidity
RiskOverdependence on Corporate Deposits .
Overall cost of deposits increases since corporate
deposits usually command higher rate of
deposits on GIA.
When an Islamic bank is overly dependent on corporate deposits,
withdrawals at maturities will create adverse asset-liability mismatches. Cost overrun when the bank acquires funds
from more costly money market sources such as Negotiable Islamic instruments
(NII).
Dependence on money market funds to finance
operation.Eg Northern Rock
LIQUIDITY RISK
Lack of Liquidity – Funding Problem #1Short-Term
DepositsCurrent and
Savings Accounts
Low cost deposits
Long-term
DepositsProfit-
Sharing Investment
Account (GIA)
High Cost Deposit
Lack of Liquidity : Problem #2
Assets
BBA
Sukuk
Deposits
CASA
PSIA
MutualFunds/Unit TrustStock Market
Concentration RiskLow-Cost Deposit
High-Cost
Deposit
GIA
GIA
GIA
GIA
CA & SA
Asset Liability Long-term
Financing1-20 years
Short-term Funds1-12
months
Concentration RiskReliance on money-market funds to replace withdrawals
Withdrawals of Corporate Deposits (PSIA)
Liquidity RiskFall in
Earnings
Increase in
Cost of Funds
Liquidity Risk Funding liquidity risk – a bank’s inability
to mobilize deposits to satisfy withdrawals. Also referring to deposit concentration risk.
Mitigating liquidity risk through Salam contracts
Islamic Liquidity Hub
Surplus BankBroker A
Broker B
Buy X $9.5m Deliver X at specified date (maturity)
Sells X $10m
Cash $10m
Buy X at $10m
Deliver X
Salam financing SB places $10m with ILH with fixed
income. How? SB buys commodity (ie palm oil) from ILH
for $9m (ie below market price) and waits for delivery in 6 months time.
ILH uses the cash for investment. ROI varies, not known upfront. (eg, 10%, 7%, 20%)
At maturity, ILH purchases commodity from Supplier B via Broker B at $10m and make delivery to SB.
SB sells the commodity to Supplier A via broker A for $10m. Thus, SB gains $0.5 million.
SHARIAH RISK AND OPERATIONAL RISK
Shariah risk is the potential loss to the Islamic bank arising from cost of civil actions carried or absorbed by the bank from lawsuits by customers. The cost of the civil actions may include:
264
Compensations and damages paid to
customers
Returning profit
collected from the Islamic facility
Cost of court
proceedings
Reputation risk.
•Financial Distress•Default
Credit risk
•Litigation•Civil Court hearing
Foreclosure
•Invalid contract•Improper documemntation
Shariah risk
265
Legality Issue
Court judgement issued by
Malaysian High Court Judge Datuk Abdul Wahab Patail pertaining to
the invalidity of murabaha/al-bai-bithaman
ajil
Shariah Risk
266
BBA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION
1. Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA)2. Property Purchase Agreement (PPA)3. Property Sale Agreement (PSA)4. Deeds of assignment/Charge
2. Bank do not have legal + beneficial ownership of property to make a valid sale
‘Do not Sell what you do not Own” Hadith (Sahih Bukhari)
High Court Judge Datuk Abdul Wahab Patail says that the sale element in BBA sale is not a bona fide sale (Mayban Finance vs Taman Jaya)
1. No transfer of title from Customer to Bank
Latest Court Case on Islamic Banking268
Abdul Khalid Ibrahim(Defaulted on his debt obligation, contract not
valid when BIMB violated collateral agreement)
BIMB(Dispose of collateral)
Shariah risk can be avoided by attending to:
269
Financial reporting requireme
nt
Legal documenta
tion requireme
nt
Maqasid-Shariah
requirement.
Shariah Board
Governance
270
Shariah Risk in BBA Financing
Financial reporting: prior to PSA, bank
must hold ownership of asset. Recorded as
fixed asset.Legal documentation: transfer of ownership
from bank to customer. Warranties.
Maqasid approach: benefits outweigh the
disbenefits.
There are two aspects of financial transaction involving Islamic banking business, namely:
The concept of the transaction: This concerns whether the contract is based on sale, ijarah,
wakalah, musharakah and other common contracts in Islamic banking, where the pillars
of ‘aqd are central.The legal documentation of the transaction that spelt out the
rights, responsibilities and obligations of the contracting parties. In essence, it defines the relationship between the bank and the
customer. Usually the documentation is based on civil law.
271
Shariah RiskLosses arising from money
paid by Islamic bank to customers when contracts
were found invalid in favour of customers.
Contracts and legal
documentation are not
consistent.
Sale with no transfer of ownership
title.
Form over substance.
Purchase undertakings
in Musharakah
sukuk.
272
Operational risk An operational risk is, as the name
suggests, a risk arising from execution of a company's business functions. It is a very broad concept which focuses on the risks arising from the people, systems and processes through which a company operates. It also includes other categories such as fraud risks, legal risks, physical or environmental risks.
Shariah risk Basel II: Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from
inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
People – outright fraud – eg poor loan origination due to kickbacks.
Shariah risk and People – negligence and deliberate action leading to improper conduct of contract causing injuries to counterparties.
Murabaha/BBA: Sale contract but rights and obligation of counterparties are equivalent to that of loan agreement.
Shariah Risk There are two aspects of financial transaction
involving Islamic banking business, namely: The concept of the transaction: This concerns
whether the contract is based on sale, ijarah, wakalah, musharakah and other common contracts in Islamic banking, where the pillars of ‘aqd are central.
The legal documentation of the transaction that spelt out the rights, responsibilities and obligations of the contracting parties. In essence, it defines the relationship between the bank and the customer. Usually the documentation is based on civil law.
Approved Islamic Finance Products• BBA Home Financing• Bay Inah Home Financing• Bay Inah Personal Financing/Overdraft/credit card• Tawaruk munazam personal financing• Commodity murabaha• Ijarah thumma al-bay• Bai-bithaman Ajil Islamic Debt Securities (BAIDS)• Discounted Bay al-dayn MuNif• Sukuk Ijarah• Sukuk Musharakah
Challenging issues in AQAD-based Islamic Finance Products • Benchmaking profit rate against interest rate (LIBOR,KLIBOR).• Profit Equalization Reserve (PER) – displaced commercial risk• Sale with condition to buyback at predetermined price between two and three parties.• Profit generated over installment payments – time value of money• Penalties on delayed payments• Benchmaking sukuk rates against LIBOR• Musharakah with Purchase undertakings – fixed profit to one party only.• Ijarah Sukuk - Sale with repurchase agreement at par value and not mark-
to market• Ijarah Sukuk – Ownership of asset by SPV• Profit-rate swaps – speculation or gambling?
Shariah Risk Foreclosure Foreclosure is the legal process by which a mortgagee or other
lien holder, usually a lender, obtains a court ordered termination of a mortgagor's equitable right of redemption. Usually a lender obtains a security interest from a borrower who mortgages or pledges an asset like a house to secure the loan. If the borrower defaults and the lender tries to repossess the property, courts of equity can grant the borrower the equitable right of redemption if the borrower repays the debt. While this equitable right exists, the lender cannot be sure that it can successfully repossess the property, thus the lender seeks to foreclose the equitable right of redemption.
Court Declaration A declaration is a written statement submitted to a court
in which the writer swears 'under penalty of perjury' that the contents are true. That is, the writer acknowledges that if he is lying, he may be prosecuted for perjury. Declarations are normally used in place of live testimony when the court is asked to rule on a motion.
Effect on Profit and Loss Client to return only the Principle Facility Principle + Profit Profit = earned and unearned profit. Paid amount and earned profit Bank to write-off earned profit –
Clawback effect Opportunity cost of Principle Facility.
Shariah risk in Islamic Financial Instruments Financial reporting: prior to PSA, bank must hold ownership
of asset. Recorded as fixed asset. Legal documentation: transfer of ownership from bank to
customer. Warranties.
Shariah risk Maqasid approach: benefits outweigh the disbenefits. • Losses arising from money paid by Islamic bank to
customers when contracts were found invalid in favour of customers.
• Form over substance.• Contracts and legal documentation are not consistent.• Eg. Sale with no transfer of ownership title. • Sale without warranties• Purchase undertakings in Musharakah sukuk.
Shariah risk Shariah risk is the potential loss to the
Islamic bank arising from cost of civil actions carried or absorbed by the bank from lawsuits by customers. The cost of the civil actions may include:
Compensations and damages paid to customers
Returning profit collected from the Islamic facility
Cost of court proceedings Reputation risk.
INVESTMENT DAR (KUWAIT) IN ISLAMIC WRANGLE WITH BLOM BANK (LEBANON)Investment Dar defaulted on a $100 million sukuk last year and is restructuring its debts.
Investment Dar’s Sukuk Default Kuwait's troubled shareholding company Investment
Dar is refusing to pay Lebanon's Blom Bank $10.7 million, saying that their original deal did not comply with Islamic law, in a move that could pressure the Islamic finance industry.
According to a legal brief circulated this week and obtained by Reuters, Blom sued the company in a British court last year, asking for the principal it invested plus a 5 percent return, as structured in a deal it conducted with Daar in 2007.
Investment Dar vs Blom Bank The issue revolves around the
concept of interest and risk-sharing. Under the deal, known as a wakala, Dar served as an agent and accepted funds from Blom that it would invest in a sharia-compliant manner.But the contract called for the company to return the principal investment plus a fixed profit -- a deal Dar's attorneys now say constitutes interest, which is prohibited under sharia law.
Investment Dar This is a very dangerous defence," said
Sheikh Muddassir Siddiqui, sharia scholar and partner at law firm Denton Wilde Sapte. "For people dealing with Islamic financial organizations, it adds sharia risk to all the other common risks out there.”
286
TS ABDUL KHALID IBRAHIM VS BIMBClient defaulted on his RM66.60million BBA debt obligation obtained in 2001
High Court ordered TS Khalid Ibrahim to pay US$18.52m (RM66.67m) facilities that he obtained from BIMB to purchase Guthrie in 2001.
Court order without full court hearing since this is a common case of default.
TS Khalid made an appeal. Appeal court allows full court hearing if
the dispute involves violations of Islamic law.
The Client claimed that the BBA contract becomes invalid when BIMB disposes off the collateral (Guthrie shares) upon default.
BIMB sells the collateral to recover the amount the Client owes the bank.
BBA agreement Asset Purchase Agreement : Client sells
shares to Bank for $60m on cash basis. Asset Sale Agreement : Bank sells shares
Client for $70m (ie. $60m principle + $10m profit) on deferred payment basis
Charge Agreement: Client places the shares as collateral.
Rahn and Charge Agreement Civil law : Charge agreement - does not
need court order to sell of the collateral. Islamic law: shares charged to bank as
Rahn Islamic law requirse full court hearing
before it can make a court judgement to sell of the shares.
Shariah Risk• Potential loss to the bank arising from
cost of litigations against the bank as result of contract invalidation through the court of law.
• Shariah risk can be avoided by attending to:
1. Financial reporting requirement2. Legal documentation requirement3. Maqasid-Shariah requirement.
MEASUREMENT OF SHARIAH RISK AND BANK LOSS.
Shariah risk Highly exposed Islamic banking portfolio to credit financing
instruments such as BBA is not spared from losses due to default. Other unique risks faced by Islamic banks that can severely reduce its earning are risk of return risk (RoR) and displaced commercial risk (DCR). The former is potential loss arising from loss of deposits to conventional banks when rate of Islamic deposits are less competitive than interest rates on conventional deposits. The latter is the potential loss when the bank uses it own reserves to smoothen rates on Islamic deposits. Recently, a new type of risk called Shariah risk, surfaces into actual drama in both the legal and banking fraternity as it challenged the legality of BBA financing. It calls for immediate remedies to save Islamic banking from serious reputational risk as well as severe financial loss.
IFSB - Shariah risk The Islamic Financial Service Board (IFSB) defines Shariah
risk as one arising when an Islamic financial institution (IFI) offering Islamic financial services fails to comply with Shariah rules and principles determined by Shariah Board of the IFI or the relevant bodies in the jurisdiction in which the IFI operates. It asserts that IFIs should ensure that their contract documentation complies with Shariah rules and principles with regards to the formation, termination and elements possibly affecting contract performance such as fraud, misrepresentation, duress or any other rights and obligations (IFSB 2005).
Shariah risk When an Islamic financing facility is ruled invalid in the
court of law due to say, fraud and misrepresentation, Shariah risk can then be defined as the potential loss to the Islamic bank arising from the nullification of contracts with adverse impact on bank’s earnings. In general, Shariah risk originates from credit risk. It is triggered by default on BBA debt obligations leading to court hearing for foreclosure wherein the plaintiff and defendant will put their cases before the judge. The cost of the lawsuit may include the compensations and damages paid to customers, returning profit collected from the Islamic BBA facilities to the customers, cost of court proceedings and reputation risk.
Shariah risk can emerge many ways such as:
Foreclosure case against the customer upon default
Customer seeking a court declaration that BBA is invalid:
Foreclosure case against the customer: The bank filing lawsuit against a customer who has
defaulted on his murabaha/BBA obligation. But the judgement may turned in favour of the defendant (ie. customer) such as in the case of Arab-Malaysia Finance v Taman Jaya when the Judge Dato’ Wahab Patail ruled the contracted BBA as a non bona fide sale as it (ie BBA) constitutes a financing facility with a charge agreement rather than a sale. As the contract is void, the customer should only gives back the principle amount advanced to him by the bank. This also means that the bank must return the profit it has acquired from the customer, if total payments at default exceeded the original amount. This shall be discussed in more detail in Section 10.
Validity of BBA The court ruling by High Court Judge Dato’ Wahab Patail
concerning the validity of BBA (Abdul Wahad Patail 2008, Arab-Malaysian Finance vs Taman Ihsan Jaya). It is a civil court case that revolves around a default by Taman Ihsan Jaya that had received a BBA facility from Arab Malaysian Finance Berhad. Since the legal right of the property remained with the client, the bank was seeking to foreclose the property in court. Evidence concerning the contract validity was first sought in the legal documentation of the facility rather than what the counterparties perceived the contract to be. The court ruling on July 18th 2008 was in favour of the defendant as the judge held that the application of the BBA contract ran contrary to the Islamic Banking Act 1983, noting that the BBA sale is “not a bona fide sale”. As the BBA contract was seen to be faulty, the defendant was required to return only the original amount of the BBA facility to the bank, thus affecting the profit already realized by the bank.
299
Customer seeking a court declaration that BBA is invalid:
This action may take place when the customer is facing difficulties to fulfill his BBA obligations as the housing developer has abandoned the project. The customer is paying both rental on the house his family is currently staying and the BBA monthly payments which is too hard to carry out. According to BBA contract, the bank who acts as the selling party must made delivery of the subject matter upon completion. But the seller/bank has failed to deliver the property although the customer has made payments based on the agreed contract. Another case concerns incorrect use of contract.
High Court Ruling on BBA “[69] This court holds that where the bank purchased
directly from its customer (ie PPA) and sold back to the customer with deferred payment (ie PSA) at a higher price in total, the sale is not a bona fide sale, but a financing transaction, and the profit portion of such Al-Bai’ Bithaman Ajil facility rendered the facility contrary to the Islamic Banking Act 1983 or the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 as the case may be”.
“[70] Acting upon the basis that the bank’s action resulted more likely from a misapprehension rather than of intent aforethought, the court holds the plaintiffs are entitled under section 66 of the Contracts Act 1950 to return of the original facility amount they had extended”.
301
For example, a BBA contract is only suitable for completed property but many Islamic banks have been using BBA instead of istisna’ for housing under construction. There is a Shariah compliance issue here at stake. In either case, the customer will file a lawsuit against the Islamic bank for not fulfilling its obligation. A lawsuit is a civil action brought before a court in which a party (plaintiff) has claimed to have received damages (ie. BBA payments without delivery, rental paid on current premise), the plaintiff, seeks a legal or equitable remedy.The defendants are required to respond to the complaint of the plaintiff. If the plaintiff is successful, judgment will be given in the plaintiff's favor, and a range of court orders may be issued to enforce a right, award damages, or impose an injunction to prevent an act or compel an act. A declaratory judgment may be issued to prevent future legal disputes.
Loan and BBA financing Based on the rules of BBA, an illustration is given in the
following. Hamid is keen to purchase a $200,000 apartment in Kuala Lumpur, which he has seen in person. He will meet the developer/vendor and sign a Sale and Purchase agreement (S&P) after placing a 10% down payment, i.e. $20,000. In conventional practice, Hamid will look for a bank that can lend him the remaining sum of $180,000. Assume that Fastbank approves the loan and disburses a sum of $180,000 to the developer on behalf of Hamid. Thus, Hamid gets a loan from Fastbank and settled the remaining balance with the developer on cash basis. Hamid will pledge the property as collateral via the charge agreement on the $180,000 loan. Assuming interest rate at 4% flat over 20 years, Hamid will pay the bank $144,000 more in interest. His monthly installment = ($180,000 + $144,000) / 240 = $1350.
BBA financing Once the Fastbank holds ownership via PPA, it then sells the property to
Hamid via the Property Sale Agreement (PSA). The terms are as follows: Seller (Fastbank) and Buyer (Hamid) Object of sale : Apartment Price of object: Cost price $180,000) + profit margin ($144,000) =
$86,000 = $324,000. Installment payments = $324,000/240 = $1350 per month. To sum up, conventional financing consists of the following contracts,
namely: Contract of loan between the Fastbank and Hamid. Deeds of Assignment/Charge.
BBA financing The same procedure applies for Islamic banks. But the transaction
becomes complicated when Fastbank is not involved in the sale and purchase agreement (S & P) with Hamid. Instead similar to conventional arrangement, Hamid purchases the property from the developer. He puts up RM20,000 as down payment to secure the Sales and Purchase (S&P) agreement on his favour. In this manner, Hamid becomes the beneficiary owner of the property.
But how could Fastbank observe the rules of BBA (to sell the property to Hamid) when in the first place it does not own the asset? The Holy Prophet pbuh says “do not sell what you do not own”. Here FastBank must be careful not to violate this critical Shariah injunction. To observe this Shariah rule, Fastbank is expected to purchase the property from Hamid via the Property Purchase Agreement (PPA for $180,000). Current practice indicates that the bank makes the $180,000 disbursement to Hamid, which it (ie. Fastbank) passes on to the developer.
BBA sale Once the Fastbank holds ownership via PPA, it then sells
the property to Hamid via the Property Sale Agreement (PSA). The terms are as follows:
Seller (Fastbank) and Buyer (Hamid) Object of sale : Apartment Price of object: Cost price $180,000) + profit margin
($144,000) = $86,000 = $324,000. Installment payments = $324,000/240 = $1350 per month.
BBA financing Similar with conventional practice, the house will be placed
as a collateral via the Deeds of Assignment or Charge. It says that the bank holds the right of beneficial ownership of the property in the manner that it holds the right to sell if when Hamid defaults on the BBA facility.
To summarize, BBA sale consists of three contracts, namely:
Property Purchase Agreement (PPA): Bank buys property from customer.
Property Sale Agreement (PSA): Bank sells property to customer at BBA price.
Statement of Appeal Court on IBA 1983 The trial judge had misinterpreted the meaning of 'Islamic
banking business' under s 2 of the Islamic Banking Act 1983 ('the Act'). 'Islamic banking business' as defined in s 2 of the Act does not mean banking business whose aims and operations are approved by all the four mazhabs. Further, the judges in civil courts should not take it upon themselves to declare whether a matter is in accordance to the religion of Islam or otherwise as it needs consideration by eminent jurists who are properly qualified in the field of Islamic jurisprudence. Moreover, as we had the legal infrastructure to ensure that Islamic banking business as undertaken by the banks in this country did not involve any element not approved by Islam, the court had to assume that the Syariah Advisory Council under the aegis of Bank Negara Malaysia had discharged its statutory duty to ensure that the operation of the Islamic banks was within the ambit of Islam (see paras 29-32 & 35).
308
Measurement of Shariah risk Exposure to BBA financing means that Islamic banks are
equally concerned with credit risk. In managing credit risk, they are required to measure the expected loss (EL) as well as unexpected loss (UL) from their credit financing portfolios.
Expected loss is covered by bank’s provisioning for bad debts while unexpected loss (UL) is to be absorbed by bank’s capital.
However, loss from Shariah risk is unique because it originates from BBA defaults, thus tieing it to credit risk rather than operational risk. At the moment Islamic banks in Malaysia are more concerned with the court ruling by High Court Judge Dato’ Wahab Patail in Malaysia concerning the invalidity of BBA (Abdul Wahad Patail 2008, Arab-Malaysian Finance vs Taman Ihsan Jaya).
Measurement of Shariah risk It is a civil court case that revolves around a default by Taman
Ihsan Jaya who had received a BBA facility from Arab Malaysian Finance Berhad. Since the legal right of the property still remains with the client, the bank seeks to foreclose the property in court. Evidences concerning contract validity are first sought in the legal documentation of the facility rather than what the counterparties perceived the contract to be.
The court ruling dated July 18th 2008 ran in favour of the defendant as the judge that the application of the BBA contract before the court ran contrary to the Islamic Banking Act 1983 with a note that the BBA sale is “not a bona fide sale”. As the BBA contract was seen faulty, the defendant is required to return only the original amount of the BBA facility to the bank, thus affecting the profit already realized by the bank.
Some except of the judge’s opinion are given below (MLJ 2008):
“[69] This court holds that where the bank purchased directly from its customer (ie PPA) and sold back to the customer with deferred payment (ie PSA) at a higher price in total, the sale is not a bona fide sale, but a financing transaction, and the profit portion of such Al-Bai’ Bithaman Ajil facility rendered the facility contrary to the Islamic Banking Act 1983 or the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 as the case may be”.
“[70] Acting upon the basis that the bank’s action resulted more likely from a misapprehension rather than of intent aforethought, the court holds the plaintiffs are entitled under section 66 of the Contracts Act 1950 to return of the original facility amount they had extended”.
Continue.. Although Abdul Wahab Patail’s ruling was later overturned by the
Court of Appeal, it is imperative that the loss incurred by the bank is estimated if the customer had instead seek a court declaration for BBA invalidation or if the Court of Appeal agrees with the judge’s ruling. We will consider three situations involving a BBA default and the ruling based on section 66 of the Contract Act 1950 that is, to “return the original facility amount to the bank”. The three situations are given below:
Case A: Paid amount is less than original facility, which is equivalent to 75 monthly payments before defaulting.
Case B: Paid amount is equal to original facility which is equivalent to 134 monthly payments before defaulting.
Case C: Paid amount is more than original facility which is equivalent to 185 monthly payments before defaulting.
Based on the contract between Fastbank and Mr. Hamid, the total murabaha obligation is $324,000 with the original facility at $180,000.
The financing is for 20 years (240 moths) at 4% flat profit rate per annum.
Price of object: Cost price $180,000 + profit margin $144,000 = $324,000.
Installment payment: $324,000/240 = $1,350 per month ($750 principal portion + $600 profit portion).
Example: Case A Case A1: Mr. Hamid has paid $101,250 (75 months monthly
installment) before defaulting. The outstanding balance is $222,750. However, the court has ruled the nullification of BBA and the profits elements of the 75 installments paid are to be clawed back and returned back to the customer. The court requires him to pay extra $123,750 representing the unpaid capital portion.
Basically, the total of amount of the unpaid financing will be $222,750. The amount represents the 165 months of unpaid monthly installments ($1,350 x 165 months = $222,750). However, the court settlement requires Mr. Hamid to pay another $123,750 ($180,000 - $56,250 = $123,750) being the capital portion of original financing. In other words, any profit portions from the 75 monthly installments paid are to be returned back to the customer.
Continue..Case A Impliedly, the court judgment states that the financing that was
based on trading of asset was not a bona fide sale and therefore, there shall be no profits recognized from the transaction. Therefore, the bank has to claw back any profits that have been recognized so far. This means, there will be adjustments to be taken up to the current year’s profits and the retained earnings brought forward.
From the 75 monthly installments paid by the customers, the bank has recognized $45,000 profit paid. Therefore, $45,000 must be reversed out or clawed back from the bank current year’s profits plus retained earnings brought forward and to be returned back to the customer. The result of the clawed back resulting the bank to loss $45,000. Here, the customer is appearing to gain $45,000 as a result from the court injunction notwithstanding that his liability is now $123,750.
Net payment to Bank = $123,750 - $45,000 =$78,750.
SHARIAH RISK MITIGATION
Shariah Compliance: Consistency is Critical to avoid Shariah risk
‘AQADPrinciples
LEGAL/CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION
Protection of RightsMAQASID
Benefits vs disbenefits
FINANCIALREPORTING
AAOIFI/IFSB/IFRS
Shariah Compliant Parameters• Aqad-based – Contract-based• Maqasid al-Shariah (purpose of the
Law) – impact on society• Financial Reporting – actual strength
and performance of companies• Legal documentation – identification
and recognition of rights and obligations of contracting parties.
Aqad
Agents of
Contract
Objective of
ContractSubject Matter
Offer & Accepta
nce
#1 AQAD Method
Sale (Al-Bay’)
Buyer & Seller
Transfer of Ownership from Buyer
to SellerProperty Price set on
the spot
Contract of Sale• Example: Murabaha/BBA Sale1. Buyer and Sellereg. Seller owns asset/subject matter
before making sale2. Subject mattereg. Mal mutaqawim – property with
usurfruct3. Priceeg. Set on the spot4. Offer & Acceptance eg. Verbal or in writing
Method #2: Maqasid al-Shariah/Objective of Shariah
To protect the interest of the public (society)- maslahah al-ammah by:
1. removing the harm ( ibqa)2. securing of benefits (tahsil)
Maqasid
Shariah
Removing the Harm
Securing of
Benefit
#2 Maqasid Method
MudaratSins
ManfaatProfits
“ in Gambling (maisir) and Liqour (qimar), there are some sins and some profits. But the sins are greater than the profits” (Al-Baqarah: 168).
Gambling
& Liqour
Mudarat > Manfaat
HARAM
Mudarat < Manfaat
HALAL
Downside (Madarrah) of Credit-Financing
MACRO MICRO
Economic Bubbles Bankruptcy
Subprime Loans Foreclosure
Financial Turmoil Unemployment
The upside (Manfaat) of Credit-Financing
MACRO MICRO
Allocation of Capital Wealth creation
Economic Growth Rich becoming richer
Leisure, luxury and lifestyle
Maqasid To analyse(theoretical) and
measure( empirical) impacts of financial intermediation based on aqad-based Shariah compliant products.
1. Efficiency studies2. Profitability studies3. Studies on Consumer welfare and
protection4. Studies on Financial stability
Maqasid – protecting public interest. Aqad-based products (ABP) SHOULD contain more
benefits and less harm. What if, it was proven than they (ABP) contain more
harm than good?eg. Abandon projects – customer cannot make recourse against bank as selling party?Defaulted BBA customer are required to make settlement based on the selling price.Sale with no transfer of ownership.Giving away clean inah personal financing at high profit rates– a way towards subprime inah?
Conflict between Aqad and Maqasid?
Method #3: Financial Reporting Proper recording of transactions to evident TRUE SALE. BBA – bank must put BBA asset on balance sheet prior to
sale. I week, 1 month it depends. Once sold, it is recorded as BBA receivables. AITAB assets should be on banking book as leasing assets
but now treated as “financing and advances”. External auditors (PWC, KPMG etc.) are not required by the
authority to conduct Shariah audit. And they may not be not capable to do so.
Conflict between AQAD and financial reporting?
Islamic Bank Average Balance Sheet
Assets Liabilities
Murabaha/BBA Wadiah Dhamanah deposits
AITAB Profit Sharing Investment Acct
Islamic Securities/Sukuk Capital
Assets Liabilities
FIXED ASSET1. BBA asset
1. 1/9/2008 Bank purchases Property from Vendor for $200,000
2. 15/9/2008 Bank Sells Property to Customer for $280,000
Assets Liabilities
CURRENT ASSET
2. BBA Receivables
1st October 2008
15 October 2008
BBA LEGAL DOCUMENTATION1. Sale and Purchase Agreement
(SPA)2. Property Purchase Agreement
(PPA)3. Property Sale Agreement (PSA)4. Deeds of assignment/Charge
2. Bank do not have legal + beneficial ownership of property to make a valid sale
‘Do not Sell what you don not Own” Hadith (Sahih Bukhari)
High Court Judge Datuk Abdul Wahab Patail says that the sale element in BBA sale is not a bona fide sale (Mayban Finance vs Taman Jaya)
1. No transfer of title from Customer to Bank
Method #4: Legal Documentation BBA should be documented as a true sale and
not as a loan. (Dato’ Nik vs. BIMB)
Ijarah should be documented as operating lease and not a loan (Tinta Press vs. BIMB)
Islamic bank has not practice fairness compared with conventional bank (Affin bank vs Zulkifli).
Conflict between AQAD and documentation of AQAD?
Islamic Banking Performance336
Islamic Banking Doing the right
thing1. Role of Shariah2. Achieving
Equity, Justice & Fairness
Doing things right1. Role of reason
(‘aql) and experience.
2. Efficiency
Measuring Economic Efficiency Economic efficiency occurs when the
cost of producing a given output is as low as possible.
Production of a unit of good or services is termed economically efficient when that unit of good or service is produced at the lowest possible cost.
Economic efficiency occurs when the cost of producing a given output is as low as possible.
Malaysian bank : efficiency studies
1. Katib, 1999: bank did not effectively combine their inputs
2. Amrizal & Nursofiza 2002 : BIMB performed below its optimum level where input element were not fully utilized
3. Majid et, 2003 : the efficiency of Islamic bank is not statistically different from conventional bank”
Global- Islamic banks1. Yudistira 2003 – DEA –Islamic banks suffered inefficiencies during the financial crisis2. Hassan 2005 –SFA –Islamic banking industry is relatively less efficient compared to their conventional counterparts3. Al-Jarrah & Molyneux 2003 – Larger Islamic banks are more profit efficient than smaller Islamic banks4. Brown & Skully 2005 – DEA – Islamic banks in the Middle-east are the most efficient, followed by Asia and Africa.5. Saaid et al 2003 – Islamic banks in Sudan have low efficiency
Islamic Banking Strategies To increase revenues:
Retain and expand client baseImprove cross-selling opportunitiesIncrease customer profitability through a better understanding of behavior, needs, and preferences
Detect and deter fraudulent activity such as money laundering and identity theft
Address globalization issues, cross-border Islamic banking performances, capitalization
Better manage the risk associated with investments, credit and financing and consumer bankruptcies
Increase efficiency of core business (eg. retail) processes such as call center management, processing of financing applications, etc.
Comply with industry regulations .
Religiosity = Ethics and Law MAQASID Religiosity = Niche products Niche products larger revenues – blue ocean BUT Religiosity AQAD alone credit culture cannot compete with large conventional banks that run on credit too! Islamic banks running on credit are expected to plan and strategize smartly to remain competitive in the global environment. To do so, they must have access to information that help them make faster decisions.
Credit based Banking: Bank Failure - Bank of Hiawassee
High CRE and ADC loan concentrations Weak loan underwriting and credit administration
process contributed to the asset quality problem. Capital levels did not support the risks associated with
its high CRE and ADC concentrations. Bank loan losses and increases in NPL eroded capital. The increasingly relied upon non-core funding sources
to support its loan growth. Bank of Hiawassee closed down on March 19, 2010
because the institution was unable to raise sufficient capital to support its operations.
Bank Failure Concentration risk – property sector Weak credit administration Weak loan origination/underwriting
practices Reliance on potentially volatile funding
sources. Weak Board oversight
What’s Next? Shariah-based products1. Musharakah2. Salam & Istisna Issues:1. Bank risk-appetite2. Capital requirement3. Funding4. Taxation
345
Thank You Imam Shafi`i: Knowledge is what
benefits, knowledge is not what one has memorized.
346