IS/IT Functional Specialty – Role Structure ...misrc.umn.edu/seminars/slides/2011/Powerpoint...
Transcript of IS/IT Functional Specialty – Role Structure ...misrc.umn.edu/seminars/slides/2011/Powerpoint...
PURPOSEPURPOSE
To consider the continuingTo consider the continuing change occurring in the role, str ct re and capabilities of thestructure and capabilities of the IS/IT functional specialty in firmsy
9/15/2011
Why IS/IT Structure?Why IS/IT Structure?
> It’s Changeable> IS/IT “Related” Resources Are Large and Growing
• 1-10% of revenue• Majority of capital expenditures
I t t C titi> Importance to Competitiveness• Efficiency (bottom line)• Innovation (top line)• Innovation (top line)• Improved decision making (business
intelligence)
9/15/2011
g )
7 S Factors Affecting Firm Performance
StrategyStructureSystemsStaffingSkillSkillsStyleShared ValuesShared Values
9/15/2011
Functions are a Result of Specialization
Adam Smith – EfficiencyPin factory (20 fold)Process design and resource assignment
Al Sl GM i th 20’ M F O i tiAl Sloan GM in the 20’s –M Form OrganizationSpecialization Creates a Need for Coordination
9/15/2011
Functional Specialties –Value Chain> Primary Activities
> Inbound & outbound logistics> Operations> Marketing & sales
Aft l i> After-sale service> Support Activities
> Human Resources> Human Resources> Technology development> Procurement
9/15/2011
> Procurement> Infrastructure
IS/IT – A “New” SpecialtyIS/IT A New Specialty
> 1950 – 60 Data Processing> 1970 – 80 Add Management Information> 1980 – 90 Add Information Technology> 1990 – 00 Add Enterprise Information
2000 10 Add P Gl b li ti> 2000 – 10 Add Process Globalization> 2010 – 20 ?
9/15/2011
Current Indicators of Change
Travelers Insurance – CIO is also Chief Innovation OfficerC ill T t P j t C t N TCargill – Tartan Project Creates a New TeamGeneral Mills – Standardize DataMedtronic Organize to Emphasize InnovationMedtronic – Organize to Emphasize InnovationUnited Health Group – Two IS/IT Innovation Units Others?Others?
9/15/2011
Empirical Evidence of Change
Adams, Larson and Xia – Centralization of technology and applications
Latest Work with Eric Larson – Centralization, Standardization and Less SpecializationStandardization, and Less Specialization
Luftman Survey – From Federal to Centraly
Gartner - Centralized
9/15/2011
What Relates to Structure ?What Relates to Structure ?
In the 60’s Alfred Chandler (Harvard) observed that strategy and structure go together.
Detour – Consider strategy
9/15/2011
Strategy FieldStrategy Field
Explain why some organizations operating in similar conditionsoperating in similar conditions perform differently
9/15/2011
Decision Focus in StrategyDecision Focus in Strategy
>Scope – Territory of Operations
>Competencies – Basis of C titi Ad tCompetitive Advantage
>Governance – Decision RightsParallels with IS/IT Strategy
9/15/2011
Parallels with IS/IT Strategy
Alternative Views of Strategy> Plan – Step1; if ____ , then Step 2 ; etc.
> Ploy – “fake “ plan
P iti l / biliti t t> Position – role, resources/capabilities, structure
> Perspective comprehensive long term> Perspective – comprehensive, long-term
> Pattern – post hoc observation
9/15/2011
> Pattern post hoc observation
Organization Levels in Strategy
>Corporate – Mix of Business Units>Corporate Mix of Business Units
>Business Unit Basis of>Business Unit – Basis of Advantage in an Industry
> Function – Alignment ( Corporate?
9/15/2011
> Function Alignment ( Corporate? Business Unit?)
AlignmentAlignment
> Function to Business
> Operations (internal) to Strategic (external)
Th Di i S C t i d> Three Dimensions – Scope, Competencies and Governance
9/15/2011
Position (Strategy) of IS/IT Function> Role (Scope)
> Resources /Capabilities (Competencies)
St t (G )> Structure (Governance)
> Choosing a strategy for IS/IT means establishing the> Choosing a strategy for IS/IT means establishing the role, capabilities and structure of the functional group
9/15/2011
Role?Role?
> The expectation of the broader organization regarding the functional specialty.
- Effective, reliable, secure, cheap operations Involvement in process improvement- Involvement in process improvement
- Involvement in product/service innovation- Authority in standardization of technology Of DataAuthority in standardization of technology. Of Data.
9/15/2011
Resources/Capabilities?Resources/Capabilities?
> Adams/Xia – Business W/I a Business
- innovate, operate, market, manage, adapt
W ill & B db t> Weill & Broadbent
communication messaging standardization- communication, messaging, standardization,security, operations, advice & support
9/15/2011
Structure?Structure?
> Configuration (relationships/network)> Centralization> Formalization> Standardization
S i li ti> Specialization_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Flexibility (Adaptability) - Stigler; Quality Literature -(variation) - common cause/ specific cause
9/15/2011
( ) p
Specific ConfigurationsSpecific Configurations
Agarwal and Sambamurthy – Relationships
> Partner – innovation (IS/IT = B.U.)> Pl tf i f t t (IS/IT t B U )> Platform – infrastructure (IS/IT supports B.U.)> Scalable – flexible (IS/IT supports via vendors)
9/15/2011
Specific ConfigurationsSpecific Configurations
Weill and Ross> Business Monarchy> IT Monarchy> F d l> Feudal> Federal> IT duopoly> IT duopoly> Anarchy
9/15/2011
Specific ConfigurationsSpecific Configurations
Gartner> Heritage (efficient, reliable) > Aligned (supportive)> E d ( il b i l d i )> Engaged (agile, business value driven)> Pervasive (transformational)- - - - - - - - -> Community (business unit owned/cloud)
9/15/2011
Reprise- Why Focus on Structure?> It’s changeable
> It’s changing
Aff t d b th E i t> Affected by the Environment> Demands for integration, innovation, and
intelligenceintelligence> Uncertainty, volatility, pace> Desire to imitate the larger Unit structure
9/15/2011
g
Major ForcesMajor Forces
> Demand for Integration
> Demand for Innovation
D d f I t lli (A l ti )> Demand for Intelligence (Analytics)
> Desire to Imitate larger unit structure> Desire to Imitate larger unit structure
> Environmental Uncertainty Volatility and Pace
9/15/2011
> Environmental Uncertainty, Volatility, and Pace
Demand for IntegrationDemand for Integration
> Top Line – Customer Relationship
> Bottom Line – Supply Chain
R l ti SOX EPA FDA> Regulation – SOX, EPA, FDA
> Knowledge Management Sharing (Roberto 10/14)> Knowledge Management- Sharing (Roberto 10/14)
> Economies of Scale/Scope ( diversification)
9/15/2011
> Economies of Scale/Scope ( diversification)
Effects on Structure of Demand for Integration> Configuration Change (CIO Rank)> More Centralization> More Standardization> Less Specialization
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Less (?) Formalization- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Centralizing Affect of IS/IT’s Position as a Coordinating Mechanism
9/15/2011
Demand for InnovationDemand for Innovation
> More marketing – access to the user
> More creativity – less directed by the business unit
L t i t d> Less restricted on resource use
> Access to technical specialists via sourcing> Access to technical specialists via sourcing relationships
9/15/2011
Effects on Structure of Demand for Innovation> More Standardization --|
| <---- more communication> More Centralization --|
L F li ti> Less Formalization
> Less Specialization> Less Specialization
9/15/2011
Demand for IntelligenceDemand for Intelligence
> Infrastructure capabilities
> Embedded in processes/systems
E b dd d i d i> Embedded in devices
9/15/2011
Effects of Demand for Intelligence> More centralization
> More formalization
Mi d t d di ti> Mixed standardization
> More specialization> More specialization
9/15/2011
Environmental UncertaintyEnvironmental Uncertainty
> Technical – scale;sourcing
> Economic (cost/price) – globalization;recession
S i l ( ) i l di t ffi> Social (norms) - social media;post office
> Political (regulation) Dodd Frank EPA> Political (regulation) – Dodd-Frank, EPA
> Organizational (imitation) - constraint
9/15/2011
> Organizational (imitation) constraint
Effects on Structure of Technical Uncertainty> Centralization – increasing
> Standardization – increasing
S i li ti ?> Specialization - ?
> Formalization ?> Formalization - ?
9/15/2011
Effects on structure of Economic Uncertainty
> Centralization – increasing
> Standardization – increasing
> Specialization – less
> Formalization - less
9/15/2011
Effects on Structure of Social Uncertainty
> Centralization – increasing
> Standardization - increasing
> Specialization - less
> Formalization - less
9/15/2011
Effects on Structure of Political Uncertainty
> Centralization – increasing
> Standardization – increasing
> Specialization ?
> Formalization - less
9/15/2011
Effects on Structure of Organizational Environment
> Centralization – less
> Standardization – less
> Specialization – increasing
> Formalization - increasing
9/15/2011
Collateral ImpactsCollateral Impacts
> Change – Resistance
> Curriculum – Enterprise System Implementation
> Human Resources – Broad Individuals with Access to specialiststo specialists
> Corporate Strategies – Importance of IS/IT
9/15/2011
p g p
ChangeChange
> C group resistance
> Top down or bottom up
C i i ti t titi> Crisis motivator – competition
> Available talent Permanent and transient> Available talent – Permanent and transient
> Training
9/15/2011
> Training
CurriculumCurriculum
> Enterprise System Implementation- degree of standardization (SAP)
> Social Media – Internal (knowledge management)/External (customer relations)management)/External (customer relations)
> Business Analytics – Technical vs. Practicaly
> OJT – University of Chicago
9/15/2011
Human ResourcesHuman Resources
> Breadth vs. Depth Expertise
> Local vs. Global Perspective
I t f U ’ P id ’ T i i> Importance of Users’ vs. Providers’ Training
> Importance of Turnover (+ )> Importance of Turnover (+, -)
9/15/2011