Is the World Becoming a Riskier Place? Economic Overview and P/C Insurance Industry Outlook for 2012...
-
Upload
claire-ramsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Is the World Becoming a Riskier Place? Economic Overview and P/C Insurance Industry Outlook for 2012...
Is the World Becoming aRiskier Place?
Economic Overview and P/C Insurance Industry Outlook for 2012 & Beyond
Casualty Actuaries of Greater New YorkNew York, NY
December 7, 2011Download at www.iii.org/presentationsRobert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist
Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 [email protected] www.iii.org
2
Presentation Outline
Review of Recent Events What in the World is Going On?
Summary of P/C Financial Performance Catastrophe Loss Developments & Trends
US, Global Will the Market Turn? Four Necessary Criteria:
Underwriting Loss Trends Capital/Capacity Reinsurance Markets Pricing Discipline
Other Contributing Factors to the Underwriting Cycle Investment Environment Tort/Casualty Environment Inflation
Other Contributing Factors to the Underwriting Cycle Investment Environment
3
What in the World Is Going On?
Is the World Becoming a Riskier Place?
What Are the Implications for Insurance and Risk Management?
4
Uncertainty, Risk and Fear Abound
ECONOMIC & POLITICAL CONCERNS Global Economic Slowdown Echoes of the Financial Crisis European Sovereign Debt, Bank & Currency Crises Collapse of Major Financial Institutions US Debt and Budget Crisis, S&P Downgrade & Austerity Housing Crisis Persistently High Unemployment Inflation/Deflation Runaway Energy & Commodity Prices Political Upheaval in the Middle East Regulation ChinaNow the #2 Economy in the World 2012 ElectionsCATASTROPHIC LOSS Japan, New Zealand, Turkey, Haiti, Chile Earthquakes Nuclear Fears US: Tornadoes, Flooding, Wildfires, Hurricanes, Winter Storms Manmade Disasters (e.g., Deepwater Horizon) Cyber Attacks Resurgent Terrorism Risk (e.g., Bin Laden, Gadhafi Killings)
Are “Black Swans”
everywhere or does it just seem that way?
5
What is Going On in the US and Global Financial Markets?
1. Need for a Binding, Comprehensive Solution to Europe’s Debt Problems 15 of 17 Eurozone countries put on negative credit watch by S&P on Dec. 5 Current requires construction of a “fiscal union” to save Euro monetary union Requires rewriting EU treaties to mandate strict Debt/GDP ratios (3%) with sanctions to be imposed
on violators Short-term Europe needs to build a financial “Firewall” (larger bailout fund) around Italy, Spain,
Ireland, Portugal to avoid another “Big, Fat Greek Debt Disaster” Solution: Unified strategy similar to TARP; Monetary easing; Binding fiscal pact OUTCOME: Europeans will eventually stumble into a resolution
2. Realization that US Economic Growth Will Remain Lackluster Q1 GDP just 0.4%; Q2 only 1.3%; Q3 still a subpar 2.0%; Acceleration unlikely Job growth has been anemic for months and unemployment remains high at 8.6% Markets remain extremely volatile and jittery; Housing/Debt hangover OUTCOME: Tepid growth in the 2% - 2.5% range in 2012; Unemployment 8.5% - 9%
3. View that Washington is Dysfunctional and “Rudderless” Lack of coherent, consistent medium and long term plan to deal with basic structural issues in the
US economy (debt, taxes, employment, regulation, etc.) No confidence that 2012 political cycle will resolve these problems
4. Economic Slowdown in Emerging Markets China, other economies less able to stimulate global economy than in 2008
6
Déjà Vu? Lehman II? Is This 2008 All Over Again?
Why Today is Not 2008 All Over Again The Situation Today is Very, Very Different from 2008 Credit Markets Are Not Seizing; Some Contraction in Europe Bank Balance Sheets Are in Much Stronger Shape
Capital up, charge offs falling
We Will Not Experience the Mega-Collapses/Near Collapses Like in 2008 No repeat of Lehman, AIG, Washington Mutual, Wachovia…
MF Global is not a “Systemically Important Financial Institution”
Some Additional Regulatory Controls Are Now Place
What Would Be Helpful Now? Solution to European Bank/Sovereign Debt Problem (Thought We Had One!) Long-Term Fiscal and Monetary Policy Direction Fed on Aug. 9 stated rates would remain low “at least through mid-2013”
This is not only a signal that borrowing costs will remain low over an extended period of time and that inflation will remain muted; Also tells investors that they’ll need to take on risk in order to earn returns in the market.
Congress and the Administration need to remove regulatory and tax uncertainty ASAP and drive a pro-growth agenda
8
P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview
Profit Recovery Will Be Set Back by High CATs, Low
Interest Rates, Diminishing Reserve Releases
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2011:H1 ($ Millions)
$1
4,1
78
$5
,84
0
$1
9,3
16
$1
0,8
70
$2
0,5
98
$2
4,4
04 $
36
,81
9
$3
0,7
73
$2
1,8
65
$3
,04
6
$3
0,0
29
$6
2,4
96
$3
,04
3
$3
4,6
70
$4
,75
8
$2
8,6
72
-$6,970
$6
5,7
77
$4
4,1
55
$2
0,5
59
$3
8,5
01
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.3% 2009 ROAS1 = 5.9% 2010 ROAS = 6.5% 2011:H1 ROAS = 1.7%
P-C Industry 2011:H1 profits were down 71.6% to $4.8B vs. 2010:H1,
due to high catastrophe losses and as non-cat underwriting
results deteriorated
* ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 2.3% ROAS for 2011:H1, 7.5% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What ItOnce Was: Investment Impact on ROEs
Combined Ratio / ROE
* 2009 and 2010 figures are return on average statutory surplus. 2008 -2011 figures exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2011H1 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 110.5 , ROAS = 2.3%. Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data.
97.5
100.6 100.1 100.7
92.6
99.3100.8
109.4
101.0
2.3%
7.5%7.4%
9.6%
15.9%
14.3%
12.7%
4.4%
8.9%
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2008* 2009* 2010* 2011:H1*0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
18%
Combined Ratio ROE*
Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s DepressedInvestment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs
A combined ratio of about 100 generated ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10,
10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
*
Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2011*
*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs are I.I.I. estimates. 2011 figure is an estimate based on annualized ROAS for H1 data. Note: Data for 2008-2011 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. For 2011:H1 ROAS = 1.7% including M&FG.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3%
1997:11.6%2007:12.3%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years
10 Years10 Years
2011:2.3%*
History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017
ROE
1975: 2.4%
Global Catastrophe Loss Developments and Trends
13
2011 Will Rewrite Catastrophe Loss and Insurance History
But Will Losses Turn the Market?
14
Global Catastrophe Loss Summary: First Half 2011
2011 Is Already (as of June 30) the Highest Loss Year on Record Globally
Extraordinary accumulation of severe natural catastrophe: Earthquakes, tsunami, floods and tornadoes are the primary causes of loss
$260 Billion in Economic Losses Globally
New record for the first six months, exceeding the previous record of $220B in 2005
Economy is more resilient than most pundits presume
$55 Billion in Insured Losses Globally
More than double the first half 2010 amount
Over 4 times the 10-year average
$27 Billion in Economic Losses in the US
Represents a 129% increase over the $11.8 billion amount through the first half of 2010
$17.3 Billion in Insured Losses in the US Arising from 100 CAT Events
Represents a 162% increase over the $6.6 billion amount through the first half of 2010
15Source: MR NatCatSERVICE
Natural Loss Events,January – September 2011
World Map
19
Top 16 Most Costly World Insurance Losses, 1970-2011*
(Insured Losses, 2010 Dollars, $ Billions)
*Through June 20, 2011. 2011 disaster figures are estimates; Figures include federally insured flood losses, where applicable.Sources: Swiss Re sigma 1/2011; AIR Worldwide, RMS, Eqecat; Insurance Information Institute.
$11.3$14.0 $14.9$16.3$20.5$20.8 $23.1$24.9
$35.0
$72.3
$10.0$9.3$9.0$8.0$8.0$7.8
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
WinterStormDaria(1991)
ChileQuake(2010)
Hugo (1989)
TyphoonMirielle(1991)
Charley(2004)
NewZealandQuake(2011)
Rita (2005)
Wilma(2005)
Ivan (2004)
SpringTornadoes/
Storms(2011)
Ike (2008)
Northridge(1994)
WTC TerrorAttack(2001)
Andrew(1992)
JapanQuake,
Tsunami(2011)*
Katrina(2005)
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado and
thunderstorm season would likely become the 7th
costliest event in global insurance history
3 of the top 15 most expensive
catastrophes in world history have occurred in the past 18 months
100
200
300
400
500
600
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Worldwide Natural Disasters,1980 – 2011*
Number of Events
*2011 figure is through June 30.Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 20
Meteorological events(Storm)
Hydrological events(Flood, mass movement)
Climatological events(Extreme temperature, drought, forest fire)
Geophysical events(Earthquake, tsunami, volcanic eruption)
There were 355 events through the first 6
months of 2011
22
U.S. Insured Catastrophe Loss Update
2011 CAT Losses Already Greatly Exceed All of 2010 and Will Become One of the Most Expensive Years on Record
23
$8
.3
$7
.4
$2
.6 $1
0.1
$8
.3
$4
.6
$2
6.5
$5
.9 $1
2.9 $
27
.5
$6
1.9
$9
.2
$6
.7
$2
7.1
$1
0.6
$1
3.6 $2
5.0
$1
00
.0
$7
.5
$2
.7
$4
.7
$2
2.9
$5
.5 $1
6.9
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*20??
US Insured Catastrophe Losses
*Estimate through Oct. 31, 2011.Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01. Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B.Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
2011 Will Become the 5th or 6th Most Expensive Year in History for Insured Catastrophe Losses in the US
$100 Billion CAT Year is Coming Eventually
Record Tornado Losses Caused
2011 CAT Losses to Surge
($ Billions)
2000s: A Decade of Disaster
2000s: $193B (up 117%)
1990s: $89B
24
Top 13 (14?) Most Costly Disastersin U.S. History
(Insured Losses, 2010 Dollars, $ Billions)**
*Losses will actually be broken down into several “events” as determined by PCS.**Hurricane Irene losses stated in 2011 dollars.Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments.
$8.6$11.5 $12.8
$16.3 $17.5$22.6 $23.1
$45.8
$8.2$6.7$6.3$5.3$4.3$4.3
$0$5
$10$15$20$25$30$35$40$45$50
Irene(2011)
Jeanne(2004)
Frances(2004)
Rita (2005)
Hugo (1989)
Ivan (2004)
Charley(2004)
Wilma(2005)
Ike (2008)
SpringTornadoes& Storms*
(2011)
Northridge(1994)
Andrew(1992)
9/11 Attack(2001)
Katrina(2005)
Taken as a single event, the Spring 2011 tornado season
would likely become 5th costliest event in US insurance history
25
Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2011:H1*
*Insurance Information Institute estimates for 2010 and 2011:H1Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers.Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
0.4
1.2
0.4 0.
8 1.3
0.3 0.4 0.
71.
51.
00.
40.
4 0.7
1.8
1.1
0.6
1.4 2.
01.
3 2.0
0.5
0.5 0.7
3.0
1.2
2.1
8.8
2.3
5.9
3.3
2.8
1.0
3.6
2.9
1.6
5.4
1.6
3.3
3.3
8.1
2.7
1.6
5.0
2.6 3.
35.
0
3.6
0.9
0.1
1.1
1.1
0.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
E
The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades
Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio
by Decade
1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39 2000s: 3.52 2010s: 4.15*
Combined Ratio Points
Nu
mb
er
Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity)
Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire)
Meteorological (storm)
Hydrological (flood, mass movement)
Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2011*Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2010 and First Half 2011)
*Through June 30.Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 26
50
100
150
200
250
300
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
There were 98 natural disaster events in the first
half of 2011
37
8
51
2
U.S. Thunderstorm Loss Trends, 1980 – 2011*
27
Average thunderstorm losses are up more
than 8 fold since the early 1980s
Hurricanes get all the headlines, but thunderstorms are consistent
producers of large scale loss. 2008-2011 are the most expensive
years on record.
Thunderstorm losses in the first half of 2011 totaled $16.4 billion, a new
annual record through just 6 months
*Through June 30, 2011.Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE
Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE
U.S. Winter Storm Loss Trends, 1980 – 2010 (Annual Totals) vs. First Half 2011
28
Insured winter storm losses in 2011 totaled $1.4 billion and are up 50% since 1980.
Source: National Forest Service, MR NatCatSERVICE
U.S. Acreage Burned by Wildfires, 1980 – 2010 (Annual Totals) vs. First Half 2011
29
2011 could be a severe year for wildfire damage. Acres
burned through June 30 already exceed all of 2010.
30
Inflation Adjusted U.S. Catastrophe Losses by Cause of Loss, 1990–2011:H11
0.2%
2.4%
3.4%4.9%
6.6%
8.0%
31.8%
42.7%
1.Catastrophes are defined as events causing direct insured losses to property of $25 million or more in 2009 dollars.2.Excludes snow.3.Does not include NFIP flood losses4.Includes wildland fires5.Includes civil disorders, water damage, utility disruptions and non-property losses such as those covered by workers compensation.Source: ISO’s Property Claim Services Unit.
Hurricanes & Tropical Storms, $160.5
Fires (4), $9.0
Tornadoes (2), $119.5
Winter Storms, $30.0
Terrorism, $24.9
Geological Events, $18.5
Wind/Hail/Flood (3), $12.7
Other (5), $0.6
Wind losses are by far cause the most catastrophe losses,
even if hurricanes/TS are excluded.
Tornado share of CAT losses is
rising
Number of Federal Disaster Declarations, 1953-2011*
13 1
7 18
16
16
7 71
21
22
22
0 25
25
11
11
19
29
17
17
48
46
46
38
30
22 2
54
22
31
52
42
13
42
7 28
23
11
31
38
45
32 3
63
27
54
46
55
04
54
5 49
56
69
48 5
26
37
55
98
19
7
43
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
*
*Through December 4, 2011.Source: Federal Emergency Management Administration: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema ; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Federal Disaster Declarations Is Rising and Set a New Record in 2011
The number of federal disaster declarations set a new record in 2011, with 93 declarations through Nov.
13. It is no wonder that FEMA is broke!
There have been 2,047 federal disaster
declarations since 1953. The average
number of declarations per year is 34 from
1953-2010, though that few haven’t been
recorded since 1995.
32
Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – Nov. 13, 2011: Highest 25 States
86
78
70
65 63
58
55 55 53 53 51 50 50 48 48 47 47 47 46 45 45 44 42 40 39
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
TX CA OK NY FL LA AL KY AR MO IL MS TN IA MN KS NE PA WV OH VA WV ND NC IN
Dis
aste
r Dec
lara
tions
Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
Over the past nearly 60 years,
Texas has had the highest number of Federal Disaster
Declarations
CA has had 78 federal disaster
declarations since 1953, approximately
1.1 per year, and has had 2 so far in 2011
33
Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – Nov. 13, 2011: Lowest 25 States*
39 39
36 35 35
32 32
27 27 26 26 25 25 24 23 23 22
20
17 16 16 15 14
11
9 9 9
0
10
20
30
40
50
ME SD GA AK WI VT NJ NH OR MA PR HI MI AZ ID NM MD MT NV CO CT SC DE DC RI UT WY
Dis
aste
r Dec
lara
tions
*Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.
Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute.
Over the past nearly 60 years, Wyoming, Utah and Rhode Island had the fewest number of
Federal Disaster Declarations
34
SPRING 2011 TORNADO & SEVERE STORM OUTBREAK
2011 Losses Are Putting Pressure on US P/C Insurance Markets
35
1,1
33
1,1
32 1
,29
7
1,1
73
1,0
82 1,2
34
1,1
73
1,1
48
1,4
24
1,3
45
1,0
71 1,2
16
94
1
1,3
76
1,2
64
1,1
03
1,0
98
1,6
92
1,1
56 1,2
82
1,819
1,8
05
546
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11P
Nu
mb
er
of
To
rna
do
es
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Nu
mb
er o
f De
ath
s
Number of Tornadoes
Number of Deaths
*2011 is preliminary data through October 13.Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Storm Prediction Center, National Weather Service.
Number of Tornadoes and Related Deaths, 1990 – 2011*
Tornadoes have already claimed more than 500 lives
There were 1,805 tornadoes recorded in the US by Oct. 13
Insurers Expect to Pay at Least $2 Billion Each for the April 2011 Tornadoes in Alabama and a Similar Amount for the May Storms in Joplin
Insurers Making a Difference in Impacted Communities
Source: Insurance Information Institute 37
Destroyed home in Tuscaloosa. Insurers will pay some 165,000
claims totaling $2 billion in the Tuscaloosa/
Birmingham areas alone.
Presentation of a check to Tuscaloosa Mayor Walt Maddox to the Tuscaloosa Storm
Recovery Fund
Location of Tornadoes in the US, January 1—December 5, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html# 38
1,885 tornadoes killed 546 people through Dec. 5,
including at least 340 on April 26 mostly in the
Tuscaloosa area, and 130 in Joplin
on May 22
Location of Large Hail Reports in the US, January 1—December 5, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html# 39
There were 9,413 “Large Hail”
reports through Dec. 5, causing
extensive damage to homes,
businesses and vehicles
Location of Wind Damage Reports in the US, January 1—December 5, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html# 40
There were 18,580 “Wind Damage” reports through Dec. 5, causing
extensive damage to homes and,
businesses
Severe Weather Reports,January 1—December 5, 2011
41Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html#
There have been 29,885
severe weather reports through
Dec. 5; including 1,881
tornadoes; 9,413 “Large Hail” reports
and 18,580 high wind events
Large Hail, 9,413 , 32%
Wind Damage,
18,580 , 62%
Tornadoes, 1,885 , 6%
Tornadoes accounted for just 6% of all Severe Weather
Reports through October 13 but more
than 500 deaths
Number of Severe Weather Reports in US, by Type: January 1—December 5, 2011
Source: NOAA Storm Prediction Center; http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/2011_annual_summary.html#
The BIG Question:When Will the Market Turn?
43
Are Catastrophes and Other Factors Pressuring Insurance Markets?
44
Criteria Necessary for a “Market Turn”:All Four Criteria Must Be Met
Criteria Status Comments
Sustained Period of
Large Underwriting
LossesEarly Stage,
Inevitable
•Apart from Q2:2011, overall p/c underwriting losses remain modest•Combined ratios (ex-Q2 CATs) still in low 100s (vs. 110+ at onset of last hard market)•Prior-year reserve releases continue reduce u/w losses, boost ROEs
Material Decline in Surplus/ Capacity
Entered 2011 At Record
High; Since Fallen
•Surplus hit a record $565B as of 3/31/11•Fell by 1% in Q2 2011•Little excess capacity remains in reinsurance markets•Weak growth in demand for insurance is insufficient to absorb much excess capacity
Tight Reinsurance
MarketSomewhat in
Place
•Much of the global “excess capacity” was eroded by cats•Higher prices in Asia/Pacific•Modestly higher pricing for US risks
Renewed Underwriting
& Pricing Discipline
Some Firming esp. in
Property, WC
•Commercial lines pricing trends turning from negative to flat or up in some lines (property, WC)•Competition remains intense as many seek to maintain market share
Sources: Barclays Capital; Insurance Information Institute.
1. UNDERWRITING
46
Have Underwriting Losses Been Large Enough for Long Enough to Turn the Market?
47
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2011:H1*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers 2008--2011. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=110.5 Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.; III Estimated for 2011:H1 (Q1 actual ex-M&FG was 102.2).
95.7
99.3100.8
109.4
101.0
92.6
100.898.4
100.1
107.5
115.8
90
100
110
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011*
Best Combined
Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)
As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out
Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned
Premiums
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Cyclical Deterioration
Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net
Losses
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Avg. CAT Losses,
More Reserve Releases
Higher CAT
Losses, Shrinking Reserve
Releases, Toll of Soft
Market
Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975–2011*
* Includes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers in all years. 2011 figure is actual H1 underwriting losses of $24.098 billion.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Large Underwriting Losses Are NOT Sustainable in Current Investment Environment
-$55
-$45
-$35
-$25
-$15
-$5
$5
$15
$25
$35
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 1011*
The industry recorded a $10.4B underwriting loss in 2010 compared
to $3.0B in 2009
Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through
2010 is $455B
($ Billions) Underwriting losses in 2011 will be much larger:
$24.1B based on H1
data
49
Number of Years with Underwriting Profits by Decade, 1920s–2010s
0 0
3
0
54
8
10
76
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s* 2010s**
* 2009 combined ratio excluding mortgage and financial guaranty insurers was 99.3, which would bring the 2000s total to 4 years with an underwriting profit.**Data for the 2010s includes 2010 and 2011.Note: Data for 1920–1934 based on stock companies only.Sources: Insurance Information Institute research from A.M. Best Data.
Number of Years with Underwriting Profits
Underwriting Profits Were Common Before the 1980s (40 of the 60 Years Before 1980 Had Combined Ratios Below 100) –
But Then They Vanished. Not a Single Underwriting Profit Was Recorded in the 25 Years from 1979 Through 2003
50
2.3
-2.1
-8.3
-2.6-6.6
-9.9 -9.8
-4.1
1
11.7
23.2
13.79.9
7.3
-6.7-9.5
-14.6-16 -15
-5
-$20
-$15
-$10
-$5
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$309
2
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
E
11
E
Pri
or
Yr.
Re
se
rve
Re
lea
se
($
B)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8 Imp
ac
t on
Co
mb
ine
d R
atio
(Po
ints
)
Prior Yr. ReserveDevelopment ($B)
Impact onCombined Ratio(Points)
P/C Reserve Development, 1992–2011E
Reserve Releases Are Remained Strong in 2010 But Should Begin to Taper Off in 2011
Note: 2005 reserve development excludes a $6 billion loss portfolio transfer between American Re and Munich Re. Including this transaction, total prior year adverse development in 2005 was $7 billion. The data from 2000 and subsequent years excludes development from financial guaranty and mortgage insurance. Sources: Barclay’s Capital; A.M. Best.
Prior year reserve releases totaled $8.8
billion in the first half of 2010, up from
$7.1 billion in the first half of 2009
Financial Strength & Underwriting
51
Cyclical Pattern is P-C Impairment History is Directly Tied to
Underwriting, Reserving & Pricing
P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–20108
15
12
71
19
34
91
31
21
99
16
14
13
36
49
31 3
45
04
85
56
05
84
12
91
61
23
11
8 19
49 50
47
35
18
14 15 16 18
11
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Source: A.M. Best Special Report “1969-2010 Impairment Review,” June 21, 2010; Insurance Information Institute.
The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets
8 of the 18 in 2009 were small Florida carriers. Total also
includes a few title insurers.
54
Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2010
3.6%4.0%
8.6%
7.3%
7.8%
7.1%
7.8%13.6%
40.3%
Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011.
Historically, Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing AreBy Far the Leading Cause of P-C Insurer Impairments.
Investment and Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role
Deficient Loss Reserves/Inadequate Pricing
Reinsurance Failure
Rapid GrowthAlleged Fraud
Catastrophe Losses
Affiliate Impairment
Investment Problems (Overstatement of Assets)
Misc.
Sig. Change in Business
57
Performance by Segment:Commercial Lines
Homeowners Insurance Combined Ratio: 1990–2011P
11
3.0
11
7.7
15
8.4
11
3.6
10
1.0 10
9.4
10
8.2
11
1.4 1
21
.7
10
9.3
98
.2
94
.4 10
0.3
88
.9 95
.6
11
6.8
10
5.7
10
6.7 11
6.0
11
8.4
11
2.7 12
1.7
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11P
Homeowners Line Could Deteriorate in 2011 Due to Large Cat Losses. Extreme Regional Variation Can Be Expected Due to
Local Catastrophe Loss Activity
Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2010); Insurance Information Institute (2011P).
Private Passenger Auto Combined Ratio: 1993–2011P
10
1.7
10
1.3
10
1.3
10
1.0
10
9.5
10
7.9
10
4.2
98
.4
94
.3
95
.1
95
.5 98
.3 10
0.2
10
1.3
10
1.0
10
1.0
99
.5 10
1.1
10
3.5
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11P
Private Passenger Auto Accounts for 34% of Industry Premiums and Remains the Profit Juggernaut of the P/C Insurance Industry
Sources: A.M. Best (1990-2010); Insurance Information Institute (2011P).
109.4110.2
118.8
109.5
112.5
110.2
107.6
104.1
109.7 110.2
102.5
105.4
91.2
93.7
104.1
98.9
101.2
107.5
102.0
111.1112.3
122.3
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11P
Co
mm
erc
ial L
ine
s C
om
bin
ed
Ra
tio
Source: 2011 RIMS Benchmark Survey; A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute
Commercial Lines Combined Ratio, 1990-2011P
Commercial lines in 2011 will likely experience record their
worst underwriting performance since 2002
Workers Compensation Combined Ratio: 1994–2011P
10
2.0
97
.0 10
0.0
10
1.0
11
0.9
11
0.0
10
7.0
10
2.7
98
.4
10
3.6
10
4.4 1
10
.6 11
6.8
11
8.012
1.7
10
7.0
11
5.3
11
8.2
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11P
Workers Comp Underwriting Results Are Deteriorating Markedly and the Worst They
Have Been in a DecadeSources: A.M. Best (1994-2010); Insurance Information Institute (2011P).
2. SURPLUS/CAPITAL/CAPACITY
62
Have Large Global Losses Reduced Capacity in the Industry, Setting
the Stage for a Market Turn?
64
Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2011:Q2
Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.
($ Billions)
$487.1$496.6
$512.8$521.8
$478.5
$455.6
$437.1
$463.0
$490.8
$511.5
$540.7$530.5
$544.8$556.9
$559.1
$505.0$515.6$517.9
$420
$440
$460
$480
$500
$520
$540
$560
$580
06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4 11:Q2
2007:Q3Previous Surplus Peak
Quarterly Surplus Changes Since 2007:Q3 Peak
09:Q1: -$84.7B (-16.2%) 09:Q2: -$58.8B (-11.2%)09:Q3: -$31.0B (-5.9%)09:Q4: -$10.3B (-2.0%)10:Q1: +$18.9B (+3.6%)
10:Q2: +$8.7B (+1.7%)10:Q3: +$23.0B (+4.4%)10:Q4: +$35.1B (+6.7%)11:Q1: +$42.9B (+8.2%)11:Q2: +37.3B (+7.1%)
Surplus as of 6/30/11 fell by 1% below its all time record high of $564.7B set
as of 3/31/11. Further declines are likely
*Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business in early 2010.
The Industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.78 of
NPW—the strongest claims-paying status in its history.
66
$1
2,1
30
.5
$3
9,5
07
.0
$1
8,1
42
.5
$1
0,6
46
.5
$9
84
.0
$4
18
.7
$2
2,0
29
.6
$5
86
.3
$1
0,3
89
.9
$4
,75
7.7
$1
7,3
46
.9
$1
6,1
14
.4
$5
,55
2.5
$6
,97
4.1
$8
,86
9.7
74
87
66
48 47
24
53
69
51
5656
5552
42
40
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
(Va
lue
of
De
als
$ M
ill)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Nu
mb
er o
f De
als
Value of Deals $ Mill)
Number of Deals
*2011 data are through December 1.Source: SNL Securities; Insurance Information Institute.
M&A Activity in the US P/C Insurance Industry, 1997-2011*
P/C M&A activity in 2011 is up 60% since 2008, its highest level (in $ terms) since 2008
M&A Activity in the P/C Insurance Industry Remains Well Below its 1990s Peak
72
3. REINSURANCE MARKET CONDITIONS
Record Global Catastrophes Activity is
Pressuring Pricing
Global Reinsurance Capital, 2007-2011:H1
Reinsurer Capital%
Change
Source: Aon Reinsurance Market Outlook, September 2011 from Individual Company and AonBenfield Analytics; Insurance Information Institute.
$411
$342
$402
$445$470
17%
-17%
-5%
18%
$300
$320
$340
$360
$380
$400
$420
$440
$460
$480
$500
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011:H1-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Reinsurer Capital Change
High Global Catastrophe Losses Have Had a Modest Adverse Impact on Global Reinsurance Market Capacity
Global reinsurance market capacity is down in mid-2011 due to large
catastrophe losses
Source: Guy Carpenter, GC Capital Ideas.com, September 26, 2011.
Global Property Catastrophe Rate on Line Index, 1990-2011 YTD (6/1/11)
A modest increase in global property catastrophe reinsurance pricing was
evident in June 1 renewals in the wake of record global catastrophe
losses. Larger increase could occur for the Jan.1, 2012 renewals
Source: Guy Carpenter, GC Capital Ideas.com, November 23, 2011.
Historical Capital Levels of Guy Carpenter Reinsurance Composite, 1998—2Q11
Most excess reinsurance capacity was
removed from the market in 2011,
leaving uncertainty as to the direction of
2012 reinsurance renewals
4. RENEWED PRICING DISCIPLINE
78
Is There Evidence of a Broad and Sustained Shift in Pricing?
79
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11*
Soft Market Persisted in 2010 but Growth Returned: More in 2011?
(Percent)1975-78 1984-87 2000-03
*2011 figure is for H1 vs. 2010:H1. Shaded areas denote “hard market” periodsSources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline
Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3-Year Decline Since 1930-33.
NWP was up 0.9% in 2010
2011:H1 growth
was +2.6%
80
Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2011*
*Percentage change from same month in prior year; through October 2011; seasonally adjustedNote: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
'90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11
Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur
approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early
2000s and likely the early 2010s)
“Hard” markets tend to occur
during recessionary
periods
Pricing peak occurred in 2010
82
Average Commercial Rate Change,All Lines, (1Q:2004–4Q:2011E*)
-3.2
%-5
.9%
-7.0
%-9
.4%
-9.7
% -8.2
%-4
.6% -2
.7%
-3.0
%-5
.3%
-9.6
%-1
1.3
%-1
1.8
%-1
3.3
%-1
2.0
%-1
3.5
%-1
2.9
% -11
.0%
-6.4
% -5.1
%-4
.9%
-5.8
%-5
.6%
-5.3
%-6
.4% -5.2
%-5
.4%
-2.9
%
1.7
%
-0.1
% 0.9
%
-0.1
%
-16%
-14%
-12%
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
1Q
04
2Q
04
3Q
04
4Q
04
1Q
05
2Q
05
3Q
05
4Q
05
1Q
06
2Q
06
3Q
06
4Q
06
1Q
07
2Q
07
3Q
07
4Q
07
1Q
08
2Q
08
3Q
08
4Q
08
1Q
09
2Q
09
3Q
09
4Q
09
1Q
10
2Q
10
3Q
10
4Q
10
1Q
11
2Q
11
3Q
11
4Q
11
Source: Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers (1Q04-4Q11); Marsh (Q411E); Insurance Information Institute
KRW Effect
Pricing as of Q3:2011 is positive for the first time
since 2003. Slightly stronger gains in Q4.
(Percent)
Q2 2011 marked the 30th consecutive quarter of price
declines
83
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Account Size: 1999:Q4 to 2011:Q3
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
Percentage Change (%)
Peak = 2001:Q4 +28.5%
Pricing Turned Negative in Early
2004 and Has Been Negative
Ever Since
Pricing turned positive (+0.9%) in Q3:2011, the first increase in
nearly 7 years (Q4:2003)
KRW Effect: No Lasting Impact
Trough = 2007:Q3 -13.6%
85
Change in Commercial Rate Renewals, by Line: 2011:Q3
Source: Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers; Insurance Information Institute.
Major Commercial Lines Renewed Uniformly Upward in Q3:2011 for the First Time Since 2003, With Workers Up More than Any Other Line
Percentage Change (%)
1.5%1.9%
3.0%
4.1%
0.2% 0.3%0.6%
0.8% 0.8%
1.3%
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
Ge
ne
ral
Lia
bili
ty
Su
rety
Co
mm
l Au
to
Co
nst
ruct
ion
D&
O
Um
bre
lla
EP
L
Bu
s.In
terr
up
tion
Co
mm
erc
ial
Pro
pe
rty
Wo
rke
rsC
om
p
89
Direct Premiums Written: All P/C Lines Percent Change by State, 2005-2010
44
.8
25
.4
19
.8
17
.3
16
.6
14
.2
13
.9
12
.4
12
.3
11
.9
9.1
8.1
8.1
7.1
6.8
5.4
5.2
4.7
3.8
3.7
3.1
3.0
1.5
1.2
1.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
ND
SD LA
WY
OK
WV
KS IA TX
MT
NE
DE
MS
NM SC
DC
UT
AR
NC ID WA
AL
WI
AK
TN
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute.
Top 25 States
North Dakota is the growth juggernaut of the P/C
insurance industry—too bad nobody lives there…
90
0.7
0.6
0.1
-0.1
-0.3
-0.5
-0.8
-1.4
-1.6
-1.7
-2.5
-2.8
-2.9
-3.4
-3.6
-4.1
-4.5
-4.7
-4.8
-5.7
-5.8
-8
-8.2
-8.3
-13
.5
-14
.2
-15
.5
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5M
D
MO
KY IN NY
GA
MN
VA
US
PA
OR FL IL CT
VT
OH RI
CO
NJ HI
ME
NH
MA
AZ
NV MI
CA
Pe
ce
nt
ch
an
ge
(%
)
Sources: SNL Financial LC; Insurance Information Institute.
Bottom 25 States
States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of
the past 5 years
Direct Premiums Written: All P/C Lines Percent Change by State, 2005-2010
US Direct Premiums Written declined by 1.6% between 2005
and 2010
91
Other Cycle-Influencing Factors
Could Other Factors Act as a Catalyst to Turn the
Market?
INVESTMENTS: THE NEW REALITY
92
Investment Performance is a Key Driver of Profitability
Does It Influence Underwriting or Cyclicality?
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2011:H11
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$64.0
$31.7
$39.2
$52.9
$24.8
$58.0
$51.9$56.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10 11:H1
Investment Gains Recovered Significantly in 2010 Due to Realized Investment Gains; The Financial Crisis Caused Investment Gains to
Fall by 50% in 2008
1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B.Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
2011 investment gains are likely to come in
below 2010 due to lower interest rates and poor stock market returns
94
Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. Nov. 2011*
0.01% 0.01% 0.04% 0.11% 0.26%
1.45%
2.02%
4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% 5.00% 4.93% 5.00%5.19%
0.91%
0.40%
3.04%2.73%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
1M 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y
November 2011 Yield Curve*Pre-Crisis (July 2007)
Treasury yield curve remains near its most depressed level
in at least 45 years. Investment income is falling as a result. Fed is unlikely to hike rates until well into 2013.
The End of the Fed’s Quantitative Easing Is Unlikely to Push Interest Rates Up Substantially Given Ongoing Economic Weakness
*Week ending Nov. 25.Sources: Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve Bank; Insurance Information Institute.
96
-1.8
%
-1.8
%
-2.0
%
-3.6
%
-3.3
%
-3.3
%
-3.7
%
-4.3
%
-5.2
%
-5.7
%
-7.3%
-1.9
%
-2.1
%
-3.1
%
-8%-7%-6%-5%-4%-3%-2%-1%0%
Perso
nal L
ines
Pvt Pass
Aut
o
Pers P
rop
Comm
ercia
l
Comm
l Auto
Credit
Comm
Pro
p
Comm
Cas
Fidelity
/Sure
ty
Warra
nty
Surplu
s Line
s
Med
Mal
WC
Reinsu
rance
**
Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline
*Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums**US domestic reinsurance onlySource: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute.
Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line*
Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment
97
Is the Tort PendulumSwinging Against Insurers?
98
Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10E 12E
To
rt S
ys
tem
Co
sts
1.50%
1.75%
2.00%
2.25%
2.50%
To
rt Co
sts
as
% o
f GD
P
Tort Sytem Costs Tort Costs as % of GDP
($ Billions)
Sources: Towers Watson, 2010 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A
Tort Costs Have Remained High but Relatively Stable Since the mid-2000s. As a Share of GDP they Should Fall as
the Economy Expands
Business Leaders Ranking of Liability Systems in 2010
Best States
1. Delaware
2. North Dakota
3. Nebraska
4. Indiana
5. Iowa
6. Virginia
7. Utah
8. Colorado
9. Massachusetts
10. South Dakota
Worst States
41. New Mexico
42. Florida
43. Montana
44. Arkansas
45. Illinois
46. California
47. Alabama
48. Mississippi
49. Louisiana
50. West Virginia
Source: US Chamber of Commerce 2010 State Liability Systems Ranking Study; Insurance Info. Institute.
New in 2010
North Dakota Massachusetts South Dakota
Drop-offs
Maine Vermont Kansas
Newly Notorious
New Mexico Montana Arkansas
Rising Above
Texas South Carolina Hawaii
Midwest/West has mix of good and bad states.
100
The Nation’s Judicial Hellholes: 2010
Source: American Tort Reform Association; Insurance Information Institute
South Florida
West VirginiaIllinoisCook County
NevadaClark County
Watch List
Madison County, IL Atlantic County, NJ St. Landry Parish,
LA District of Columbia NYC and Albany,
NY St. Clair County, ILDishonorable
Mention
MI Supreme Court City of St. Louis CO Supreme Court
CaliforniaLos Angeles
and Humboldt Counties
Philadelphia
Inflation
103
Is it a Threat to Claim Cost Severities
104
Annual Inflation Rates, (CPI-U, %),1990–2017F
2.8 2.6
1.51.9
3.3 3.4
1.3
2.5 2.3
3.0
3.8
2.8
3.8
-0.4
1.6
3.2
2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.52.9
2.4
3.23.0
5.14.9
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11F12F13F14F15F16F17F
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators, 10/11 and 11/11 (forecasts).
The slack in the U.S. economy suggests that inflation should not heat upbefore 2012, but other forces (commodity prices, inflation in countries from which we import, etc.), plus U.S. debt burden, remain longer-run concerns
Annual Inflation Rates (%)
Inflation peaked at 5.6% in August 2008 on high energy and commodity crisis. The recession and the collapse of the
commodity bubble reduced inflationary pressures in 2009/10
Higher energy, commodity and food prices are pushing up inflation in 2011, but not longer turn
inflationary expectations.
Medical Cost Inflation Has Outpaced Overall Inflation Over 50 Years
719.8
1589.8
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 01 06 11*
Inde
x V
alue
(196
1=10
0)
All ItemsMedical Care
*Based on change from Feb. 2011 to Feb. 2010 (latest available) Source: Department of Labor (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
A claim that cost $1,000 in 1961 would cost nearly $16,000 based on
medical cost inflation trends over the past 50 years.
Regulatory Environment & Financial Services Reform
106
Insurers Not as Impacted as Banks, But Dodd-Frank
Implementation Has Been a Concern for Insurers
Source: James Madison Institute, February 2008.
ME
NH
MA
CT
PA
WV
VA
NC
LA
TX
OK
NE
ND
MN
MI
IL
IA
ID
WA
OR
AZ
HI
NJRI B
DE
AL
VT
NY
MD
SC
GA
TN
AL
FL
MS
ARNM
KYMOKS
SDWI
IN
OH
MT
CA
NV
UT
WY
CO
AK
= A= B= C= D= F= NG
Source: Heartland Institute, May 2011
B B+
B+
D
B
C-
B-
B+
B+C-
B+C-
B
C+
C-
C-
B- D-
B
F
D
C-
C-C+
B+
B+
B+
A+
A+
C-
B
A
A
B
C+
C+
B-
B-
C+
C
F
D+F
D+
B
C+
F F
D-
2010 Property and Casualty InsuranceRegulatory Report Card
Not Graded: District of Columbia
Pennsylvania’s regulatory environment got a grade of
“C” in 2010
The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer
Growth Opportunities
115
Growth Would Also Help Absorb Excess Capital
116
US Real GDP Growth*
* Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators.Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 11/11; Insurance Information Institute.
2.7
%
0.9
%
3.2
%
2.3
%
2.9
%
-0.7
%
0.6
%
-4.0
%
-6.8
% -4.9
%
-0.7
%
1.6
%
5.0
%
3.9
%
3.8
%
2.5
%
2.3
%
0.4
%
1.3
%
2.0
%
2.3
%
1.9
%
2.2
%
2.4
%2
.6%4
.1%
1.1
%
1.8
%
2.5
% 3.6
%
3.1
%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
2
00
0
2
00
1
2
00
2
2
00
3
2
00
4
2
00
5
2
00
6
07
:1Q
07
:2Q
07
:3Q
07
:4Q
08
:1Q
08
:2Q
08
:3Q
08
:4Q
09
:1Q
09
:2Q
09
:3Q
09
:4Q
10
:1Q
10
:2Q
10
:3Q
10
:4Q
11
:1Q
11
:2Q
11
:3Q
11
:4Q
12
:1Q
12
:2Q
12
:3Q
12
:4Q
Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and
Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly
Real GDP Growth (%)
Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit
crunch, housing slump, labor market contraction has
been severe but modest recovery is underway
The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8%
2011 got off to a sluggish start, but growth is expected to proceed at a more modest, though still relatively weak
pace through 2012
2011 Financial Overview State Economic Growth Varied in 2010
117
Texas had one of the stronger economies in 2010 and has
generally outperformed during the economic
downturn
Hard hit Midwest and Northeast states finally
entering recovery in 2010
118
(Millions of Units)
New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2022F
1.4
8
1.4
7 1.6
2
1.6
4
1.5
7
1.6
0 1.7
1 1.8
5 1.9
6 2.0
7
1.8
0
1.3
6
0.9
1
0.5
5
0.5
9
0.5
9 0.6
9 0.9
1
1.3
4
1.2
3
1.3
2
1.3
81
.42
1.3
51.4
6
1.2
9
1.2
0
1.0
11.1
9
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11F12F13F14F15F16F17F18-22F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/11 and 11/11); Insurance Information Institute.
Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until 2014. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety
New home starts plunged
72% from 2005-2009; A
net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since
records began in 1959
The plunge and lack of recovery in homebuilding and in construction in general is
holding back payroll exposure growth
Job growth, improved credit
market conditions and demographics
will eventually boost home construction
119
16.9
16.5
16.1
13.2
10.4
11.6 12
.7 13.5 14
.1 14.7 15
.1
15.4
15.5
15.4
16.9
16.617
.117.5
17.8
17.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11F 12F 13F 14F 15F 16F 17F 18-22F
(Millions of Units)
Auto/Light Truck Sales, 1999-2022F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/11 and 11/11); Insurance Information Institute.
Car/Light Truck Sales Will Continue to Recover from the 2009 Low Point, Bolstering the Auto Insurer Growth and the Manufacturing Sector.
New auto/light truck sales fell to the lowest level since the late 1960s. Forecast for 2011-12 is
still far below 1999-2007 average of 17 million units, but a recovery is underway.
Job growth and improved credit market conditions will boost auto sales in
2011 and beyond
66%
68%
70%
72%
74%
76%
78%
80%
82%
Mar
01
Jun 0
1
Sep 0
1
Dec 0
1
Mar
02
Jun 0
2
Sep 0
2
Dec 0
2
Mar
03
Jun 0
3
Sep 0
3
Dec 0
3
Mar
04
Jun 0
4
Sep 0
4
Dec 0
4
Mar
05
Jun 0
5
Sep 0
5
Dec 0
5
Mar
06
Jun 0
6
Sep 0
6
Dec 0
6
Mar
07
Jun 0
7
Sep 0
7
Dec 0
7
Mar
08
Jun 0
8
Sep 0
8
Dec 0
8
Mar
09
Jun 0
9
Sep 0
9
Dec 0
9
Mar
10
Jun 1
0
Sep 1
0
Dec 1
0
Mar
11
Jun 1
1
Sep 1
1
Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Commercial Exposures
Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. 120
Percent of Industrial Capacity
Hurricane Katrina
March 2001-November 2001
recession
“Full Capacity”
The closer the economy is to operating at “full
capacity,” the greater the inflationary pressure
The US operated at 77.8% of industrial capacity in
Sept. 2011, above the June 2009 low of 68.3% and a
post-crisis high
December 2007-June 2009 Recession
58
.3
57
.1
60
.4
59
.6
57
.8
55
.3
55
.1
55
.2
55
.3 56
.9 58
.2
58
.5 60
.8
61
.4
61
.2
60
.4
53
.5 55
.3
50
.9
50
.6 51
.6
50
.8 52
.7
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
ISM Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through November 2011
The manufacturing sector has been expanding and adding jobs. The question is whether this will continue.
Source: Institute for Supply Management; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among manufacturers may be increasing in late 2011
50
.7 52
.7 54
.1
54
.6
54
.8
53
.5
53
.7
52
.8 53
.9
54
.6 56 5
7.1 5
9.4
59
.7
57
.3
52
.8 54
.6
53
.3
52
.7
53
.3
53
52
.9
56
.2
40
45
50
55
60
65
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
No
v-1
1
ISM Non-Manufacturing Index(Values > 50 Indicate Expansion)
January 2010 through November 2011
Non-manufacturing industries have been expanding and adding jobs. The question is whether this will continue.
Source: Institute for Supply Management; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among non-manufacturers may be increasing in late 2011
74
.4
73
.6
73
.6
72
.2
73
.6 76
67
.8
68
.9
68
.2
67
.7 71
.6 74
.5
74
.2 77
.5
67
.5 69
.8
74
.3
71
.5
63
.7
55
.7 59
.4
60
.7
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Jan
-10
Fe
b-1
0
Ma
r-1
0
Ap
r-1
0
Ma
y-1
0
Jun
-10
Jul-
10
Au
g-1
0
Se
p-1
0
Oct
-10
No
v-1
0
De
c-1
0
Jan
-11
Fe
b-1
1
Ma
r-1
1
Ap
r-1
1
Ma
y-1
1
Jun
-11
Jul-
11
Au
g-1
1
Se
p-1
1
Oct
-11
Consumer Sentiment Survey (1966 = 100)
January 2010 through August 2011
Consumer confidence has been low for years amid high unemployment, falling home prices and other factors adversely
impact consumers, but may be improving marginally
Source: University of Michigan; Insurance Information Institute
Optimism among consumers is recovering after plunging amid the
debt debate debacle and S&P downgrade
127
11 Industries for the Next 10 Years: Insurance Solutions Needed
Shipping (Rail, Marine, Trucking)
Health Sciences
Health Care
Energy (Traditional)
Alternative Energy
Agriculture
Natural Resources
Environmental
Technology (incl. Biotechnology)
Light Manufacturing
Export-Oriented Industries
Many industries are
poised for growth, but
many insurers do not write in
these economic segments
128
Labor Market Trends
Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal
Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving
129
Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Stubbornly High in 2011
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan00
Jan01
Jan02
Jan03
Jan04
Jan05
Jan06
Jan07
Jan08
Jan09
Jan10
Jan11
Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3
Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6
Unemployment stood at 8.6% in
October
Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983.
Peak rate in the last 30 years:
10.8% in November -
December 1982
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
U-6 went from 8.0% in March
2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 16.2%
in Oct. 2011
January 2000 through November 2011, Seasonally Adjusted (%)
Recession ended in
November 2001
Unemployment kept rising for
19 more months
Recession began in
December 2007
Stubbornly high unemployment and underemploymentwill constrain overall economic growth
Sep 11
186
7921
365
127
42 15-1
09-1
465 97
23-1
2-8
5 -58
-161
-253 -230
-257
-347
-456
-547
-734 -6
67-8
06-7
07-7
44-6
49-3
34-4
52-2
97 -215 -186
-262
75-8
316
62
229
51 6111
714
311
2 193
128 16
794
261
219
241
99 7517
372
220
117
140
144
(1,000)
(800)
(600)
(400)
(200)
0
200
400
Jan-
07F
eb-0
7M
ar-0
7A
pr-0
7M
ay-0
7Ju
n-07
Jul-0
7A
ug-0
7S
ep-0
7O
ct-0
7N
ov-0
7D
ec-
Jan-
08F
eb-0
8M
ar-0
8A
pr-0
8M
ay-0
8Ju
n-08
Jul-0
8A
ug-0
8S
ep-0
8O
ct-0
8N
ov-0
8D
ec-
Jan-
09F
eb-0
9M
ar-0
9A
pr-0
9M
ay-0
9Ju
n-09
Jul-0
9A
ug-0
9S
ep-0
9O
ct-0
9N
ov-0
9D
ec-
Jan-
10F
eb-1
0M
ar-1
0A
pr-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
n-10
Jul-1
0A
ug-1
0S
ep-1
0O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-
Jan-
11F
eb-1
1M
ar-1
1A
pr-1
1M
ay-1
1Ju
n-11
Jul-1
1A
ug-1
1S
ep-1
1O
ct-1
1N
ov-1
1
Monthly Change in Private Employment
January 2008 through November 2011* (Thousands)
Private Employers Added 3.134 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute
Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were
the Largest in the Post-WW II Period
140,000 private sector jobs were created in
October
133
Unemployment Rates by State, October 2011:Highest 25 States*
13.4
11.7
11.0
10.6
10.6
10.5
10.4
10.4
10.3
10.2
10.1
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.3
9.1
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
8.8
8.7
8.5
8.4
8.2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
NV CA DC MI MS SC NC RI FL GA IL KY TN OR AL NJ US AZ IN OH WA ID CT MO TX AR
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
*Provisional figures for October 2011, seasonally adjusted.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In October, 36 states and the District of Columbia reported over-the-month
unemployment rate decreases, 5 had increases, and 9 had no change.
134
8.2
8.1
8.1
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.6
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.0
7.0
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.4
6.1
6.0
5.7
5.6
5.3
4.5
4.2
3.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
WV CO PA DE NY WI MT AK ME MA MD LA UT KS NM HI MN VA OK IA WY VT NH SD NE ND
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
Unemployment Rates By State, October 2011: Lowest 25 States*
*Provisional figures for October 2011, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
In October, 36 states and the District of Columbia reported over-the-month
unemployment rate decreases, 5 had increases, and 9 had no change.
135
US Unemployment Rate
4.5
%
4.5
%
4.6
%
4.8
%
4.9
% 5.4
% 6.1
%
6.9
%
8.1
%
9.3
%
9.6
% 10
.0%
9.7
%
9.6
%
9.6
%
8.9
%
9.1
%
9.1
%
9.1
%
9.1
%
9.0
%
8.9
%
8.9
%9.6
%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
07
:Q1
07
:Q2
07
:Q3
07
:Q4
08
:Q1
08
:Q2
08
:Q3
08
:Q4
09
:Q1
09
:Q2
09
:Q3
09
:Q4
10
:Q1
10
:Q2
10
:Q3
10
:Q4
11
:Q1
11
:Q2
11
:Q3
11
:Q4
12
:Q1
12
:Q2
12
:Q3
12
:Q4
Rising unemployment eroded payrolls
and workers comp’s
exposure base.
Unemployment peaked at 10% in
late 2009.
* = actual; = forecastsSources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (11/11); Insurance Information Institute
2007:Q1 to 2012:Q4F*
Unemployment forecasts remain stubbornly high
through 2011, but still imply millions of new
jobs will created.
Jobless figures have been revised
upwards for 2011/12
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwigDownload at www.iii.org/presentations
Insurance Information Institute Online: