Is That a Check Engine Light? The UCF Student ......2015 Sum 2015 Fall 2015 Spr 2016 Sum 2016 Fall...
Transcript of Is That a Check Engine Light? The UCF Student ......2015 Sum 2015 Fall 2015 Spr 2016 Sum 2016 Fall...
Is That a Check Engine Light?The UCF Student Performance DashboardFebruary 22, 2018
Thomas Cavanagh, Ph.D.Vice Provost for Digital Learning
UCF
• Orlando, FL
• Metropolitan, suburban university
• 66,300+ students
• One of the largest universities in U.S.
• Carnegie classification: RU/VH Research University: Very High Research Activity
• 216 degree programs across 11 colleges
• 11 Campuses throughout Central Florida
2
Digital Learning Context
3
Online Learning at UCF
4
Pegasus Innovation
Lab
Blended Adaptive
Pilot
Adaptive Learning
Learning Analytics
Online Courses
Online Programs
Mixed-Mode
Lecture Capture
Web-Enhanced
Academic Year 2017-18
• 44.24% total university SCH online and blended• 32.43% fully online SCH
• 82.26% of all students took at least one online or blended course
• 84.97% of all undergraduates
• 64.91% of all graduate students
• 72.85% of all students took at least one fully online course
• 75.5% of all undergraduates
• 55.72% of all graduate students
5
Colleges over 50% online SCH
oHospitality
70.2% | 24.2% online only
oHealth & Public Affairs
66.1% | 56.9% online only
oNursing
64.3% | 49.4% online only
oBusiness
55.2% | (<.01 blended)
oArts and Humanities
52.6% | 40% online only
Colleges over 25% online SCH
oUndergrad Studies
48.3% | 38.2% online only
oGraduate Studies
44.4% | 19.7% online only
o Education
37.1% | 21.5% online only
o Sciences
36.1% | 25.4% online only
Academic Year 2017-18
6
100,000
300,000
500,000
700,000
900,000
1,100,000
1,300,000
1,500,000
1,700,000
02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17
F2F OTHER VIDEO BLENDED (WEB) ONLINE (WEB)
UCF Today:66,000+ Students
7
100,000
300,000
500,000
700,000
900,000
1,100,000
1,300,000
1,500,000
1,700,000
02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17
F2F
Without Online Learning:44,000 Students
8
Online Exclusive Headcount by Semester
9
6,546
9,916
6,971 6,957
10,389
7,1607,444
11,110
7,873 7,675
11,947
9,125 8,945
14,177
9,98710,495
14,709
10,654
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Spr 2012
Sum 2012
Fall 2012
Spr 2013
Sum 2013
Fall 2013
Spr 2014
Sum 2014
Fall 2014
Spr 2015
Sum 2015
Fall 2015
Spr 2016
Sum 2016
Fall 2016
Spr 2017
Sum 2017
Fall 2017
Online % and Speed to Graduation (FTIC Full-time)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
0% (face-to-face only)
1-20%
21-40%
41-60%
61-80%
81-99%
100% (online only)
Time to Degree (2014-15)
Time to Degree (Years)
N=0
N=5
N=30
N=381
N=1,556
N=2,155
N=231
10
88 91 88 88 90 8791
95 92 9195
8990 92 91 90 91 89
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Spring 15 Sum 15 Fall 15 Spring 16 Sum 16 Fall 16
F2F (n=710,463) Blended (n=99,111) Fully Online (n=234,676)
Student Success(A, B, or C grade)
11
4 3 4 4 3 43 2 3 3 2 34 3 4 4 3 40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Spring 15 Sum 15 Fall 15 Spring 16 Sum 16 Fall 16
F2F (n=710,463) Blended (n=99,111) Fully Online (n=234,676)
Student Withdrawal
12
Blended Learning 57%
Fully Online 55%
Face-to-Face 53%
Video (fully online) 47%
Video (blended) 45%
N = 1,431,907
– Dziuban & Moskal, 2017
Overall “Excellent” Student Ratings
13
Data Context
14
Data Usage
• Descriptive:
• Diagnostic:
• Predictive:
• Prescriptive:
15
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
Data Usage
• Descriptive: what happened?
• Diagnostic: why did it happen?
• Predictive: what will happen?
• Prescriptive: how can we make it happen?
16
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
Data Usage
• Descriptive: what happened?
• Diagnostic: why did it happen?
• Predictive: what will happen?
• Prescriptive: how can we make it happen?
17
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
Data Usage
• Descriptive: what happened?
• Diagnostic: why did it happen?
• Predictive: what will happen?
• Prescriptive: how can we make it happen?
18
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
A Shift in Perspective
• We used to think of students as cohorts and our data about them was historical, e.g.:
• Last fall’s freshman class
• This term’s transfer students
• The problem with this approach is that by the time we can see the data, the damage is already done
19
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
Predictive Analytics
• Predictive analytics is the practice of extracting information from existing data in order to predict future outcomes and trends
• Using predictive analytics allows us to intervene with students on an individual basis before a problem occurs
20
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
21
Actionable Insight
TransactionalData
TransactionalData
TransactionalData
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
22
Actionable Insight
CRM
LMSERP
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
23
Course Term Year Degree
STUDENT SUCCESS
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
Predictive Analytics Toolkit
• UCF-generated analyses
• EAB SSC-Campus
• UCF-developed Student Dashboard
24
Courtesy of Joel Hartman
EAB SSC-Campus
25
UCF Student Performance Dashboard
https://lti.online.ucf.edu/spd-standalone/26
Fall 2016 Survey Results (n=96)
• The majority of respondents were juniors (54%) or seniors (24%), expecting As (41%) or Bs (49%)
• 41% of students never used the dashboard, but 25% used it daily.
• Of the very few students (n=28) who offered open ended responses as to why they did not use the dashboard, the overwhelming majority indicated a lack of awareness regarding the dashboard rather than dislike of the dashboard.
• The dashboard was reported as being easy or very easy to use by 79% of respondents (n=52), with the ‘assignments due soon display’ and ‘current score display’ being the most utilized and most helpful features.
• The ‘goals display’ was rated as the least helpful feature by 20% of the respondents.
27
Fall 2016 Survey Results (n=96)
• Most (72%) of the respondents felt the dashboard was somewhat or very accurate, although 15% were unsure.
• Students expressed concerns over grades being displayed as artificially low during the beginning of the semester as a lack of grades input made it appear as if they were failing.
• Students liked the accessibility and visualization of the dashboard, especially for keeping up to date with assignments and course performance.
• 57% of students who used the dashboard believed it motivated them to change their behavior either a little or a great deal in regards to the course.
28
Lessons Learned & Next Steps
• Communication is key• Even with prompting, students did not know it was
there
• Pilot launched mid-semester—not optimal timing
• Technical issues
• Re-architecture and relaunch pilot
• New UI/UX
• Tool tips / Pop up info
29
Other Relevant Initiatives
30
COHPA Competency Dashboard
• Track program competencies for accreditation and compliance
• Competencies mapped in a custom Peoplesoftapplication
• Faculty map competencies to assignments within Canvas
31
COHPA Competency Dashboard
• Track program competencies for accreditation and compliance
• Competencies mapped in a custom Peoplesoftapplication
• Faculty map competencies to assignments within Canvas
32
Notes:
• This tab is only visible and accessible to the course instructor
“Zero Probation”
33
Grade ranges in a course
Notes:
• Instructor can get a bird’s eye view of students in different grade ranges
“Zero Probation”
34
Number of students with grade
Notes:
• Instructor can look for changes in student counts in each grade range
“Zero Probation”
35
Students in selected grade range
Notes:
• Select specific students or the entire group
“Zero Probation”
36
Message to be sent to selected students
Notes:
• Instructor can send a custom message
“Zero Probation”
37
Notes:
• Instructor selects a student in a group
“Zero Probation”
38
Notes:
• Messages are sent to selected students in Webcourses (Canvas)
• Will show up in conversations inbox
“Zero Probation”
39
College Algebra: Change In
Student Progress Over Time
40
Kn
ow
led
ge C
ove
red
Kn
ow
led
ge C
ove
red
Days Days
Finished course early Started late and finished on time
Math Sequence: Adaptive
Learning Across Courses
41
Psychology: Mean Module Scores By Course Success
0
2
4
6
8
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Mea
n
Module
Success(n=258)
Non-success(n=20)
42
43
Students’ Adaptive Learning Behaviors
44
Data Mining Partnership
• Examine Canvas LMS data to determine correlations with student success
• Student behaviors
• Faculty behaviors
• Usage of certain tools/features
• Etc.
45