Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance
17
Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance Maxine Schache
description
Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance . Maxine Schache. Background. Story. Implications. Maxine. Grumble. Background. Background. Results. Representative sample. 64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations) 59 Low level sprinklers. Results. Results. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance
Irrigation system checks results – who’s responsible for poor performance Maxine Schache
Background
Story
Implications
MaxineGrumble
Background
Background
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
drip
low level
overhead
Pressure variation %
Disc
harg
e va
riatio
n %
ResultsRepresentative sample
64 Drip systems (49 flow rate variations)
59 Low level sprinklers
Results
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate
Non PC 6.7,7.4,3
PC 13.6,8.3,2.2
PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6
PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4
PC 69.2, 8,2.3
PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3
PC 9.1, 2.4,2
PC 20, 11.5, 2.3
PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3
PC 23.9, 9.5, 2
PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6
PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3
PC 10, 12.5, 2.3
Pressure KPa
Dis
char
ge L
/Hr
Results
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate
Non PC 6.7,7.4,3
PC 13.6,8.3,2.2
PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6
PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4
PC 69.2, 8,2.3
PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3
PC 9.1, 2.4,2
PC 20, 11.5, 2.3
PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3
PC 23.9, 9.5, 2
PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6
PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3
PC 10, 12.5, 2.3
Pressure KPa
Dis
char
ge L
/Hr
6.7% PV7.4% DV
Results
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate
Non PC 6.7,7.4,3
PC 13.6,8.3,2.2
PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6
PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4
PC 69.2, 8,2.3
PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3
PC 9.1, 2.4,2
PC 20, 11.5, 2.3
PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3
PC 23.9, 9.5, 2
PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6
PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3
PC 10, 12.5, 2.3
Pressure KPa
Dis
char
ge L
/Hr
33.3% PV4.2% DV
70.4% PV11.4% DV
Results
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Drip pressure variation, discharge variation, nominal flow rate
Non PC 6.7,7.4,3
PC 13.6,8.3,2.2
PC 39.2,17.6, 1.6
PC 70.4, 11.4, 4.4
PC 69.2, 8,2.3
PC 11.8, 7.7, 2.3
PC 9.1, 2.4,2
PC 20, 11.5, 2.3
PC 12.1, 4.2, 2.3
PC 23.9, 9.5, 2
PC 10.3, 9.7, 1.6
PC 33.3, 4.2, 2.3
PC 10, 12.5, 2.3
Pressure KPa
Dis
char
ge L
/Hr
9.1% PV2.4% DV
Results
Drip 9/64 pressure5/49 discharge
Sprinkler38/59 pressure23/59 discharge12/59 DU
Results
Grade Drips Low level sprinklers
A
B
C D
FAIL
WHY SO BAD?
PC
CID&
Industry confidence
&training
?
