IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA...

22
IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning under change Patrick Reed Professor of Civil Engr., Cornell University [email protected] Image Credit: The Atlantic, Mar. 2014, Reuters/Robert Galbraith

Transcript of IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA...

Page 1: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water

systems planning under change Patrick Reed

Professor of Civil Engr., Cornell University

[email protected]

Image Credit: The Atlantic, Mar. 2014, Reuters/Robert Galbraith

Page 2: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

A qualitative starting point…

7/29/2015 2

13 Case Studies

-UK & Australia -Denver Water -Bureau of Rec. -CA DWR -MWD -many more Seeking robustness across possible futures

Page 3: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

“Bottom-up” decision frameworks

7/29/2015 3

(Decision Scaling, Info-Gap, RDM, MORDM, Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways …)

Page 4: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Planning under uncertainty: Some context

What do robustness-based decision frameworks have in common?

How do methodological choices impact decision recommendations?

How does the MWD IRP link to the state-of-the-art?

7/29/2015 4

Page 5: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Evaluate alternatives in multiple

states of the world…

Quantify robustness measures and

determine sensitive uncertainties

What do robustness analyses have in common?

7/29/2015 5

Page 6: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

7/29/2015 6

What actions?

What causes

failures?

What world?

Acceptable in

many worlds?

Page 7: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Planning under uncertainty: Some context

What do robustness-based decision frameworks have in common?

How do methodological choices impact decision recommendations?

How does the MWD IRP link to the state-of-the-art?

7/29/2015 7

Page 8: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Eastern U.S. example of four water

utilities through 2025

Four regional objectives:

• Volumetric reliability

• Restriction frequency

• Average cost

• Worst-case cost

(Zeff et al. 2014)

7/29/2015 8

The worst-performing utility is optimized such that others will perform as well or better.

Page 9: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

What risk-of-failure should trigger demand restrictions?

5%

0%

10% 10%

0%

4%

5%

4%

What risk-of-failure should trigger water transfers?

Risk-based triggers for drought management

10%

0%

3%

1%

What percent of revenue should each utility save as self-insurance?

10%

0%

3%

6%

What percent of revenue should each utility put toward third-party insurance?

7/29/2015 9

(Must be specified for every utility)

Page 10: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Avoiding Tunnel Vision: Scenarios vs. Exploratory Modeling

http://www.hockscqc.com/articles/tunnelvision/tunnel-vision.jpg

7/29/2015 10

Which solutions are robust? How to decide?

Sample deeply uncertain states of the world (inflows, demand, etc.)

Page 11: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055

Raw

Wat

er D

eman

d (m

gd)

OWASA Demand Projections

1969

1987

1998

20082011

Actual

Previous OWASA Demand Projections 7/29/2015 11

It is very common to make poor predictions

Page 12: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Construct alternative states of the world for different

combinations of uncertainties

7/29/2015 12

2 of 13 uncertainties including demand seasonality, reservoir evaporation, transfer prices, etc.

Page 13: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Given/assumed

(classic scenarios) Discovered via modeling (scenario discovery—RDM)

7/29/2015 13

Page 14: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

An assumed focus on climate/hydrologic factors

may fail to capture system vulnerabilities

? Rate of demand growth controls success more so than hydrology

7/29/2015 14

Page 15: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

7/29/2015 15

Acceptable in

many worlds?

Page 16: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

References: Schneller and Sphicas (1983)

Number of successes Number of failures

7/29/2015 16

Page 17: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

7/29/2015 17

What causes

failures?

Page 18: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Discovering sensitive uncertainties

improves robustness of alternatives

7/29/2015 18

Page 19: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Planning under uncertainty: Some context

What do robustness-based decision frameworks have in common?

How do methodological choices impact decision recommendations?

How does the MWD IRP link to the state-of-the-art?

7/29/2015 19

Page 20: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

7/29/2015 20

Page 21: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Some summative comments

MWD is serving as a national/international leader in planning

Climate change is not the only concern, RDM allows the consideration of many uncertainties

In the future it would interesting to more fully link the uncertainties in the “scoping” and “implementation/policy” phases of the IRP

7/29/2015 21

Page 22: IRP Context: State-of-the-art in water systems planning ... 2016 background materials part 2...OWASA Demand Projections 1969 1987 1998 2008 2011 Actual 7/29/2015 11 Previous OWASA

Thanks!

Acknowledgements

NOAA SARP #NA110AS2310144

NSF SCRiM #GEO-1240507

USDA WSC #2014-67003-22076

References

Herman et al. (2015) How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change? JWRPM, 04015012.

Herman et al. (2014) Beyond Optimality: Multi-stakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty. WRR, 50, 7692-7713.

Zeff et al. (2014) Navigating financial and supply reliability tradeoffs in regional drought portfolios. WRR, 50, 4906-4923.

7/29/2015 22