IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

52
URL VS IRL. HOW ON-LINE AND REAL WORLD ADS INTERACT TO INFLUENCE BEHAVIOUR Mark Melford - Founder Captive Media

Transcript of IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Page 1: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

URL VS IRL. HOW ON-LINE AND REAL WORLD ADS INTERACT TO INFLUENCE BEHAVIOUR Mark Melford - Founder Captive Media

Page 2: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 3: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

“Look everyone! - Oh, never mind”

Page 4: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

CRISISEUROHOUSINGATTENTION

Page 5: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

ATTENTION

Page 6: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

• exposed to over 600 advertising messages a day)

• filter these messages as never before

• watch less TV, and consume less traditional media

• are out and about 30% more than a decade ago

“CONTINUOUS PARTIAL ATTENTION”

Page 7: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

“I KNOW that half of all I spend on advertising is wasted.

...I just dont know which half”

John Wanamaker

Page 8: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

TARGETING

Page 9: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

TARGETING ≠ ATTENTION

Page 10: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 11: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

=fn (Targeting, Cut-through, Impact)

Page 12: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

£££

Page 13: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Value for Money?

0

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

Global Ad Spend Retail Spend

94.1%70%

5.9%30%

On-line / "URL"Real World / "IRL"

Source: Magna Global, Centre for Retail Research, eMarketer

$22 trn 2014$600 bn

Page 14: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

2017

0.56.76.25.9

12.2

11.4

19.6

37.4

Share of global ad spending by Media:

Source: Advertising Expenditure Forecast from ZenithOptimedia

0

25

50

75

100

2005

0.46.68.413.1

29.1

5.6

36.8

TVInternetMobileNewspaperMagazineRadioOutdoorCinema

2013

0.56.96.97.9

17

20.6

40.2

Page 15: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

The TV anomaly. Spend keeps growing…

0

8

16

24

32

40

48

56

64

72

80

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

73.7770.5968.5466.3564.54

Source: eMarketer

The growth in TV spending US $bn

Source: Neilson

Linear TV Viewership in US

as audience declines

Page 16: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Linear TV now accounts for less than half of video viewing… 2014

Page 17: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Linear TV now accounts for less than half of video viewing… 2015

43.5%

Page 18: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

So… URL - On-line and Mobile - to the rescue?

Page 19: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 20: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Recent Issues with On-line: ‘Viewability,’ ‘bot-Fraud’, UX , ad blocking

“Part of it is the industry needs to be better at producing ads that are

less annoying”Larry Page, CEO of Google, when asked about this at Google Shareholder meeting June 2015:

Page 21: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

=fn (Targeting, Cut-through, Impact)

Page 22: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 23: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 24: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 25: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 26: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 27: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 28: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Outdoor TV

Mobile Close Prox On-line

Cut-through

Page 29: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Outdoor TV

Mobile Close Prox On-line

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)

3.7 3.7

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

2.80

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

1.90

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

3.5

Page 30: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Outdoor TV

Mobile Close Prox On-line

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)

3.7 3.7

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

2.80

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

1.90

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

4.4

Page 31: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

=fn (Targeting, Cut-through, Impact)

Page 32: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Outdoor TV

Mobile Close Prox On-line

Impact-fullness

Page 33: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Outdoor TV

Mobile Close Prox On-line

0

10

20

30

40

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)

2.6 2.8

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

2.10

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

1.70

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

2.5

Page 34: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Outdoor TV

Mobile Close Prox On-line

0

10

20

30

40

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1)2 3 4 Very Likely (5)

2.6 2.8

0

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

2.10

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

1.70

12.5

25

37.5

50

Very unliklely (1) 3 Very Likely (5)

2.7

Page 35: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

0

0.75

1.5

2.25

3

0 1.25 2.5 3.75 5

On-lineMobile

Outdoor

TV Close Prox

Impact-fullness

Cut-through

Page 36: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 37: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 38: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

=fn (Targeting, Cut-through, Impact)

Page 39: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Courtesy: Litaagroup

Page 40: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

• Wifi ON

• Blue Tooth ON

• Push Notifications ON

• APP Downloaded AND all above

Page 41: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

On-line advertising influences real world purchase decisions

Path to Purchase (old)

Page 42: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

…and vice versa! Path to Purchase (New)

Page 43: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Source: Google, TNS and Ogilvy. Six-month survey of 2,458 recent purchasers of auto vehicles, beauty products and smartphones

Consumers’ top 10 influences % citing factor

Word of MouthRetailers and store visits

You Tube - "how to" videosTwitter

Company / brand websitesFacebookPinterest

Newspapers and MagazinesTV and Cinema

Search

0 20 40 60 8051

5656

5961

64

5155

6974

Real World / "IRL" On-line / "URL"

Page 44: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

“Knives out for boss of blunder pollsters”

Peter Kellner, YouGov

Page 45: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

Voters change their mind ‘in the booth’

40%McKinsey

% of purchase decisions made in store

70%Ogilvy Active

Page 46: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

>> “DOoH” growing faster than paid search

Page 47: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

=fn ( )

advertiser consumer

Page 48: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 49: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

2007

Consumers’ new relationship to media

CONSUMERS ‘TRADE’ THEIR ATTENTION

2015

>> Be Entertaining

Page 50: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016
Page 51: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

‹#›

Over 70,000 game engagements/week. Significant data capture

Data Capture163,896 games played over 14 days512,480 tomatoes were thrown

Campaign Impact23,351 visitors to Anthony Nolan’s website1,572 donor registrations, and uplift of 74.9%

See more at: http://www.captive-media.co.uk/election/

Page 52: IRL vs URL Digital Marketing Midterm 2016

www.captive-media.co.uk

@Captive_Media

[email protected]