Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

38
VIDEO LANDSCAPE FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION Bucharest 2014 “Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism Doctoral Thesis (abstract) Supervisor: Ph. D. Professor Architect Florin Machedon Ph. D. Student: Irina Pața

Transcript of Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Page 1: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

VIDEO LANDSCAPE

FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Bucharest 2014

“Ion Mincu” University of Architecture and Urbanism

Doctoral Thesis (abstract)

Supervisor: Ph. D. Professor Architect Florin Machedon Ph. D. Student: Irina Pața

Page 2: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

FOR ME LANDSCAPE HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH CINEMA. Wim Wenders

Page 3: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

The main purpose of this research is to complete the toolkit for landscape study taking into

account the way a society, characterized by movement, evolves to a continues increase of

living environment rate of transformation. The research highlights the importance of dynamic

analysis of the landscape and the need for appropriate tools that can capture and sustain its

movement. The interaction between film and landscape is covered in two directions that relate

to techniques and significance. It follows a method that is based on several steps: how the

landscape is filmed, shown in various film productions (via the database of landscape videos)

and how a montage is able to conveys a specific message.

ABSTRACT

VIDEO LANDSCAPE

FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Supervisor: Ph.D Professor Architect Florin Machedon

Ph.D Student: Irina Pața

BUCHAREST 2014

Page 4: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

INTRODUCTION

Motivation

Context

Research question - objectives - hypotheses

Study methodology

Purpose of the study

Glossary of terms

STUDY ACTUALITY

Context

Interdisciplinary

The relationship between architecture and cinema - concepts transfer

Film as a critic and witness of landscape evolution

Architecture as a tool in film

Film as a pedagogical tool

Conclusion

LANDSCAPE REPRESENTATION IN FILM

Introduction. Elements of cinematic history

Precinema

Cinema

Conception. Landscape dramatic role and ambience

Context

Landscape in decor psychology

Composition. Landscape in cinematic image composition

The frame

Compositional elements into the frame

Light and colour

Plan

Angle of framing

Camera movement

Technique. Editing logic in shooting a landscape

Types of montages

Cinematographic punctuation

The relation between sound and image

Conclusions

CONTENTS

I II III

Page 5: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Landscape analysis

Context

Landscape analysis through image study

Film analysis

Decomposing a film sequence

Phe Pulse of a Neighbourhood (2011), Marina Marquez

City sounds (2013), Erick Flores Garnelo

Shunpo (2012), Steven Briand

La roue [The Weel] (1923), Abel Gance

Radiant City (2006), Jim Brown, Gary Burns

Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House (1948), H.C. Potter

Walkabout (1971), Nicolas Roeg

Conclusions

DATABASE

Proposed structure

Adding information

Searching engine

Documentary sheets for video sequences

Conclusion. Applicability

VIDEO LANDSCAPE

Grid of technical suggestions

Video landscape structure

Conclusion. Future research lines

Annexes

Bibliography

Filmography

List of illustrations

IV V VI

Page 6: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

6 abstract

The environment in which we live in has the ability to shape our lifestyle and personality, the

vision that we have about the concepts that guide our lives. This research starts by bringing

together several of my passions: landscape studies, pedagogy and film.

As an assistant professor I want to have the ability to transmit to students, through a common

language, the importance of landscape study and the complexity of the concept itself. This

made me turn to the cinema. Often, I find myself in the position of giving a movie or a video

as an example in order to complete my vision about an issue. Cinema is of an overwhelming

complexity with almost unlimited resources in terms of cultural and spatial studies. This

research wants to discover the specific features that support the landscape dynamic

and the elements that make the film such a suitable medium for transmitting landscape

expressiveness.

Along with the theoretical analysis regarding significance, the research has a practical side

that can be used in landscape studies. It creates an online platform that completes the

classic documentation of a project, a landscape video library opened for specialized users to

supplement or amend. Also, the research defines a grid of parameters that can be take into

consideration when you want to use video as a tool in landscape design process. This grid aims

to provide a starting point in making a video landscape, some suggestions concerning the ways

you can transmit a concept, some filming and montage techniques, composition ideas or usual

frame length.

MOTIVATION

I. INTRODUCTION

Page 7: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

7VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

This research makes additions to existing studies that support video as a tool in urban and

landscape design and supports the cultural evolution of the concept.

CONTEXT

The speed that defines our contemporary society evolution calls into question how we

understand and design our living environment, the vision that we have on it. Landscape

as an element of synthesis between architecture and urbanism, requires theoretical and

practical approaches to address the new trends in design. Charles Waldheim, professor in

the Department of Landscape Architecture at Harvard University identifies two types in

this aspect (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2011). On one hand, a synoptic system

(mainly represented by GIS applications and ortho-photo-plans) and on the other hand, one

scenographic, sensitive, subjective (sustained by rendered images, collages and montages -

photos, video).

This paper investigates the sensitive direction in landscape study, it takes into consideration

the influence of motion pictures upon the landscape, is considering video as a tool in

landscape design.

The thesis is based on several current research lines that include: the continuous search for

finding tools that can improve the design and education process and the relationship with

the new technology trends; the environment capacity to store and transmit information and

messages and the diversity of channels used; the subjectivity of perception and observation in

reading the landscape (natural, architectural, urban, cultural, common).

This research focus on the possibility to enrich the process of interpreting the landscape for

a better understanding of the mechanisms by which we relate to it, an alternative method of

reading and [re]presenting the landscape that sustain the existing approaches.

Page 8: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

8

The thesis proposes video as a tool for landscape study. The research develops in two stages of

analysis that will be reflected in two lines of practical implementation.

On one hand, it aims to study the relationship between cinema and urbanism - how landscape

is represented in films: its role, meaning, metaphors or symbols, filming and editing techniques.

From this line will emerge a database, a library of video landscapes, structured with the

purpose of defining and presenting the context and significance that different landscapes have

in films, both in terms of significance or image composition and editing techniques.

On the other hand, it aims at a comparative research between landscape analysis and film

analysis in order to highlight common concepts that refer

to landscape context or composition. Its result will be a grid

of technical suggestions that may be considered in making

a landscape video.

Film as a tool for analysis and [re]presentation in landscape

studies is supported by the two directions described

above. The landscape analysis through film is achieved

by the video survey (the direct recording of the landscape

using a video camera) and by the landscape video library

(documentation regarding technical representation and

landscape significance). Landscape [re]presentation is done

Fig. A.001 - Landscape approach from an interdisciplinary perspective // [source: author]

Fig. A.002 - Phases in the dissertation structure // [source: author]

Page 9: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

9VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

through a video landscape. The term [re]presentation is preferred for marking the duality of

the instrument as a means of representation (in terms of cultural approach) and the technical

presentation in front of an audience (video montage of classic representations of landscape,

text, sound and moving images). The study wants to be completed in two directions: the way

the landscape is seen through the camera and later, how it is represented through editing.

The research does not focuses on film as a tool for spatial design or as steps in landscape

intervention structure, only on film as a tool of analysing and representation.

The films, as cinematographic productions, chose as examples belong to different categories

(genres). The research is concerned more on stressing the diversity of roles that a landscape

can play in a film and less on finding certain trends or characteristics of an era or of a specific

culture. This diversity supports the concept of landscape complexity and interdisciplinary. In

addition to films, the database (landscape video library) can gather music videos, commercials,

short films and other montages that have the main subject a landscape or the landscape

representation technique increases the diversity of ways in which a landscape can be embodied.

RESEARCH QUESTION - objectives - hypotheses

The study is based on an initial research question:

• How film can be used in landscape design process?

and the main purpose is to identify the relationships between moving images (as a mean of

expression) and landscape by investigating the way it is represented in and through film (as a

language). The thesis aims to a research line that is not enough explored - the relationship

between film and landscape in professional design process. It aims to identify ways in which the

film facilitates landscape analysis and significance transfer.

From here emerges the main objective of the research: to identify how film can be used as a

tool for landscape analysis and representation.

Page 10: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

10

The hypotheses that support the research and the objectives are:

• society evolution requires the adaptation to new requirements for the living environment planning and design instruments;

• the new technologies have implications for how we interact between us and the landscape;

• film can be used as a tool for landscape studies - the only one able to capture its dynamics and movement;

• film, as a language, is capable to enrich the expressivity of landscape design projects;

• film is a universal language, more and more used by different users;

• a Technology Era demands dynamic and accessible tools to work with, online tools to support the knowledge exchange and sharing.

STUDY METHODOLOGY

This paper searches for tools able to strengthen the relationship between film and landscape

as a new line of research regarding the design process.

The methodology of this paper contains two parts.

The first structures the context in which the research is developed emphasizing the importance

of the study in today’s literature, both from theoretical and practical point of view (by analysing

different case studies). It builds the theoretical framework: the relationship between film and

landscape in terms of concepts (symbols, metaphors, significance), composition and technique

through a comparative study of landscape and film analysis. The interaction between film and

landscape is approached from two main directions that relate to techniques and significance.

It uses a method that is based on the way the landscape is captured by a camera, presented in

various film productions and the role of editing in sending a specific message.

The conclusions of the theoretical framework are used for the practical approach of the thesis

and are materialized in two levels of detail: a database, an online library - the synthesis tool

Page 11: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

11VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Fig. A.003 - Thesis logical diagram// [source: author]

Page 12: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

12

for landscape elements in film - and a video landscape as an example of how landscape can be

analysed and represented through film.

The conclusions of the second part will be used in pointing to possible directions for future

research.

The analysis of urban space and landscape often overlook relevant elements or the quantity

of information is so great that synthesizing it is almost impossible, in both cases is neglected,

most of the time, the sensitive nature of the landscape. Andrei Pleşu (2009) emphasize that the

classical landscape analysis still relies heavily on fragments rather than the whole, on levels, is

selective, abstracted, isolated or searches differences and can often pass the overall view, it’s

fluidity, complexity, subjectivity that is, in fact, the landscape: stopping cannot be a good way

to understand the fundamental movement of nature, its coherence, lacking in fragments (Pleşu

2009, 46). It is desirable therefore, to analyse the way how film captures different landscape

features otherwise omitted and if by this way of reading and interpreting, we can improve the

landscape design process.

The main goal of this research is to complete the toolkit for landscape studies by using video

recording technologies (the increasing importance of video language in today’s communication

process). The study emphasizes the importance of landscape dynamic analysis and the

need for specific tools that can support and capture its movement. This thesis supports and

complements similar researches that forms a new direction in landscape approach and

design. Film is proposed as a tool for this new method that opens original perspectives. Both

the database and the grid of technical suggestions in making a video landscape, are designed

to encourage the use of this tool and explore other ways of communicating and interpreting

landscapes.

PURPOSE OF THE THESIS

Page 13: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

13VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

II. STUDY ACTUALITY - previous researches

Chapter II highlights the context in which this research takes place, the relationship between the

studied fields, the interdisciplinary of the concepts used in reference to theoretical and practical

directions:

• The relationship between architecture and cinema - concepts transfer;

• Film as a critic and witness of landscape evolution;

• Architecture as a tool in film;

• Film as a pedagogical tool.

The relationship between film and landscape is investigated in order to underline the relations

between environment, senses and representation. The film is studied not only as a mean, but as

a language1, and further more, as an instrument of representation. Landscape representation

in architectural drawings has not the power to grasp its complexity due to three attributes that

landscape incorporates: landscape spatiality (places, like things, conjure up a wealth of images

and ideas), landscape temporality, and landscape materiality (landscape experience belongs to

the sensorium of the tactile, the poetry of material and touch) (Corner, 1992, 147-149).

The existing theoretical background leans mainly on the relationship between architecture and

cinema (Cairns, Eisenstein, Godard, Higham, Koolhaas, Nouvel, Pallasmaa, Tschumi), landscape

perspective is less analysed (Bruno, Girot, Hopkins). Thus, we can identify an insufficiently

discussed segment that is intended to be approached and explored in more detail.

Film as an instrument is based on the transfer of processes, concepts and meaning, develops

a critical thinking on how to watch a movie, has a documentary role and explores other

relationships in terms of landscape analysis and representation.

1 Film is more than a mean of expression, is a language based on image, a reproduction of reality affecting the subjective and acquires significance (Martin, 1981, 30-35).

Page 14: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

14

Film as a tool supports a new space design method, recently debated, particularly in academia,

with an experimental character, more in architecture and with timid attempts in urbanism and

landscape. It is another tool with other principles that has the ability to enrich the perspectives

and attitudes towards space design:

... it is very difficult to accept that it (the sounding approach of urban phenomenon, a.n.) also can be a synthetic one, that it can start vice versa, that the decoding and caring systematization of urban aspects are not the only way in which it can be contained. [...] filmic approach is essentially synthetic ... it does not decompose, but recompose ... the whole can be regarded otherwise than as a sum of its individual components. (Popescu, 2007, 205).

Girot concluded that precisely this ability to find, integrate and synthesize such complexity (of a

landscape, a.n.) in thinking and design is what we lack today. (Girot, 2006, 91)

Landscape is essentially a cinematic space by the way it is organised in time, through the

dynamics of space and movement in space. A landscape in a film can be a source of inspiration,

a critic on a specific issue, can act documentary or metaphorically (using symbols for

transmitting messages) or instrument of analysis and investigation (video surveying, editing), of

design or presentation and representation (the transformation of cinematographic techniques

and effects into stylistic principles or spatial organization).

This paper focus on film as a tool for analysis and [re]presentation of the landscape, the line

for cinematographic concepts transfer into the logic of landscape design is only mentioned and

is open for future research.

III. LANDSCAPE REPRESENTING IN FILM -the relationship between film and landscape

Chapter III details landscape’s form of expression in cinema evolution by developing some

specific elements of history of landscape representation in film in terms of design, composition

and technique.

The analysis of how landscape is captured in film (as a representative for moving images in

Page 15: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

15VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

general) was performed in order to create a critical attitude (from landscape architecture’s

point of view) on how to watch a movie and how to develop the capacity to filter and select

the presented information. The close relationship between urbanism / landscape architecture

and film / stage design is reflected by the experience of discovering the space (urban / natural

or cinematographic), visually and culturally. Landscape in film may reflect both an objective

structure of reality or a metaphorical one, different views and attitudes embodied in a given

space and time. Such an analysis is needed for a better connection to context and cultural

elements in landscape design and planning.

Summarizing the theoretical framework, landscape role in film can be defined as:

• decor - supports the film ambience, the landscape is in the background, it is not thought as a show itself, but supports the narrative and character development. The landscape may be setting itself or can have a documentary role.

• character - a dramatic role, a symbolic landscape, dynamic, with continuous changes, developing and completing with the narrative or the characters.

• sub-textual - metaphorical or allegorical, landscape is more than a decor or a character in the movie, it appeals to cultural and conceptual values to increase the visual and dramatic expressiveness, rises multiple interpretations that go beyond the screen and grasps the subjective reality of the spectator.

In a cinematic sequence, a landscape can fulfil multiple roles, the style of a film can be defined

as the ratio between the dramatic scenery and ambience (Bazin, 1949, 216).

Capturing the landscape dynamics, relating to its evolution over time or to the perception in

motion, requires a simplified composition1, but with a greater expressivity than static images

(by calling the sense of proportion, balance and logic of editing). The study of stage-lighting,

framing and the structure of compositional lines of the landscape in film completes the

symbolic and metaphorical structure in reading it (landscape roles) with elements related to the

organization in space. This study highlights the role of movement in landscape discovering. It

show the relationship between composition and landscape:

• Framing and changing plans determine the reading of the landscape between whole and detail, macro-landscape relates with micro-landscape. The close-up plan exceeds its role of visual detail, the textures representation creates an haptic image.

1 A complicated framework requires a rudimentary composition. (Bouleau, 1979, 49).

Page 16: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

16

•Capturing the landscape into a cinematographic image presents stylistic effects (of composition, colour and light) that can be translated into landscape design elements. Working with accents, rhythm, proportions of textures, lights and shadows, colour can map the basis for any concept in a landscape project.

• Filming techniques (travelling and panning) approach the audience to actual reading of the landscape, in movement. These techniques capture the idea of paths in space (used many times in both urban and landscape design), used for a sequentially discovery of it.

Editing principles of a landscape film serve to emphasize the rhythm of perception and

reading, its symbolic and cultural value accentuated by similarities or contrasts of sound, image

and meaning, the spatial relationships between landscape and man (user) or its evolution,

development, and transformation.

• Editing logic approaches to the structure of photomontage and collage as a technique of representing the landscape, overlapping characteristic and defining features for its identity, emphasizing or veiling parts for the message to have persuasive power. A montage is closer to the storyboard method (which otherwise is borrowed from cinema), the sequential presentation of paths or landscape dynamics (both in analysis and proposals). Unlike these techniques, the montage captures two important elements of the landscape: the movement and sound.

In this chapter it was analysed the way how landscape is represented in film, the role it

plays and its plastic expression. The analyse reveals two major landscape presentation lines

(directions which are complementary and overlapping):

• The documentary role of the landscape - real or imaginary landscapes presented as cultural expression of a certain period in time and space, objective or metaphorical structure, full of visions, symbols and associations.

• Landscape as a moving picture - the study of film images focuses on compositional effects of elements that can be translated into the functional and aesthetical structure of a landscape project. Space and paths design require the study of changes in a the dynamic landscape composition, as one of the possible ways.

Editing principles can be used to structure the presentation of the landscape project, either

as video sequence or as the logic of the presentation. Through montage, landscape can be

captured in its complexity, putting, in a short sequence of time, its defining characteristics,

whether the context, details and textures, compositional structure - the dominant colour

accents, rhythm, overlaid plans - or cultural symbols. Editing methods and techniques give

coherence and meaning to the sequence and are designed to develop other ways of presenting

Page 17: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

17VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

a landscape, otherwise difficult or even indecipherable. The montage is used in this way to

synthesize.

IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS - deciphering the landscape through film analysis

Chapter IV proposes to develop an analysis of a landscape in a film sequence taking into account

the elements used for landscape deciphering in urban analysis through image study and the

structure of elements used in film analysis. The methodological approach used in deciphering

the landscape through film analysis is embodied in three steps:

• Landscape analysis, in terms of urban studies, with emphasis on subjective reading of the landscape and image study;

• Film analysis with emphasis on specific concepts used within and their interdisciplinary character;

• Decomposing a film sequences using the already analysed criteria, deciphering how the landscape was represented and then synthesised its elements in a grid of suggestions in making a video landscape.

Thus, it is proposed to find new relations between these two fields (landscape architecture and

cinema), relationships that encourage film concepts to enrich the perspectives on landscape.

The analysis reveal a number of common elements used in landscape or movie decoding

referring to context and language elements.

Subchapter Decomposition a film sequence proposes to exemplify a landscape deciphering

method through film, analysing 7 clips (three short films made at different levels of

Fig. A.004 - Proposed approach to deciphering the landscape through film analysis// [source: author]

Page 18: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

18

professionalism, and four movie clips, different in terms of the ratio between technique and

significance). It investigates several levels (concept, editing logic and transition types, image

composition, shooting technique and frame length) and how each clip addresses these issues.

The analyses are carried out in terms of how the landscape appears in film, both in terms of

significance (the relationship between the general concept with the landscape, the role of

landscape in clip - as decor, as character, sub-textual role) and technique (how to edit - as an

expression of the concept - filming technique and landscape composition).

Although the sequences occupy a fairly wide range, there are some recurring elements and

lines of solutions:

1. Context: The relationship between the concept and the narrative structure (of the

landscape) materialized by the editing logic (the way the shots are added and paste reflects the

overall concept and it subordinates to narrative, the meaning, the message). This is reflected

by:

Fig. A.005 - Summary table of the common elements of landscape or movie decoding in specialized analysis // [source: author]

urbanism cinematographyContext Structure territory evolution narrative

Organisation spatial organisation, land use

editing, Mise-en-scène

Image landscape ambiance DecorLanguage elements Accents, dominants Node, landmark axes intersection,

symbol Compositional axes, force lines

paths, limit in territory

compositional armature

Panoramas and successive plans

visual depth of fields camera movement, panning shot, framing

Textures and colours Relation between build and natural - the degree of intervention into landscape

Tonal proportion - light and colour

Perspective point Types of perspective Angles of filming

landscape analysis film analysis[urbanism] [cinematography]

Page 19: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

19VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

a. Plans with inserted text - can be part of the generic and have an important

role in completing the visual information with written information, presents the clip concept

or conclusion. It is an objective way of transmitting information, leave fewer interpretations,

presents the author’s vision.

b. Montage rhythm - fast, symmetrical, slow, upward to one or more points of

intensity, generally organized on a classical narrative structure in three or five points. Either

as a whole or a clip sequence we find a part of orientation (introduction in context or general

issue), a complication (with one or more points of tension) and a resolution (conclusion). It is

determined by the frame length and type of transitions.

2. Composition: how landscape is depict in motion:

a. The shooting technique determines the frame length and the type of

information transmitted: how landscape is captured emphasizes its rollers in the clip, the

author’s attitude and message that he wants to communicate.

b. The image composition reflects and supports the concept by different

techniques: compositional axis, repetitive frames as leitmotivs, close-up and long shots

alternation, movement in frame, colours, light and contrast, audio composition). It can be a

symbolic or metaphorical image.

c. The transitions types used influences the message: image cuts, sound cuts,

motion cuts, compositional or ideas cuts.

V. DATABASE - working and synthesis instrument for landscape elements in film

Chapter V proposes to organize an online platform to include a landscape video library with

a documentary role; its structure takes into account three directions studied in Chapter III -

landscape in film concept, image composition and representation technique.

Page 20: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

20

The Database is proposed as a working and synthesis tool for landscapes features represented

in films. This is the result of interaction between cinema and urbanism and aims to facilitate the

search of different landscape issues (conceptual - how the urban development was addressed

in films, the relationship between landscape dynamic and sociocultural or political trends,

landscape and urban design troubleshooting, or technical - how to capture a landscape through

the camera lens and editing logic).

The database will be an online library of video landscapes (Landscape video library - http://

www.lvl.pata.ro/). Each sequence or landscape film will be represented by an identification

sheet which will include written data, images and / or videos.

These data are divided into two classes of information, one that refers to the entire film / video

(text data - title, year, credits, presented landscape and real location, keywords, comments -

images or hyperlinks) and the second will highlight one or more significant sequences from a

particular point of view in terms of landscape representation technique (text data - comments,

keywords, location, reviews, sequence localization, simple or as tables - and videos).

VI. VIDEO LANDSCAPE - tool for analysis and [re]presentation

Chapter VI proposes synthesizing the analyses elements from the first part of the paper in a

grid of technical suggestions in making a video landscape, exemplify this concept by creating an

montage, and drawing future lines of research.

The grid of technical suggestions in making a video landscape is a rough guide and is directed

by two general categories according to the type of landscape to be analysed or represented:

tense / dynamic / diverse landscape and calm / unitary / balanced landscape.

Page 21: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

21VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Time Sequence Location

Presented Landscape [year]

Actual Location [year]

Image Composition)

Camera Movement

Montage

Comments

Keywords – Tags External

Links - Googlemaps

Sequence: Composition and shooting techniques

General Information: Subject - Content – MeaningKeywords – Tags

Textbox Comments

Title

Year

Credits

Presented Landscape [year]

Actual Location [year]

External Links - IMDB, youtube, vimeo

Film / Video General Information

accelerate montage, close-up shots

Saint-Gervais d’Auvergne -> Nice

Sequence that presents one of the first accelerate montages. The usage of different types of shots (concerning the length, angles and field sizes) embodies the scene with great expressivity.

[Rhythmic Montage] [Symbolically Montage] [Spatial Connections] [Decoupage technique] [Analytic Assembly] [Sound Montage] [Contrast Montage]

[Travelling] [Panoramic] [Zoom] [Dolly Zoom] [Camera Angles]

[Structural Lines] [Light] [Colour] [Sound] [Rhythm]

France [1923]

trainscape; mountain landscape [1923]

[1:39:14 – 1:44:34]

The movie is presenting the landscape from Saint-Gervais d’Auvergne to Nice viewed from the train, the dynamic perception of the landscape. The mountain landscape of Mont Blanc is also playing an important role in the visual image of the movie. The landscape is more than a visual background, is emphasizing the narrative and the characters.

dynamic perception of landscape, train, accelerate montage; black and white

La roue

Nice; Saint-Gervais d’Auvergne; Mont Blanc mountains; Chamonix [1923]

France: mountains landscape [1923]

Abel Gance (director)

1923

La roue [The Wheel]

Fig. A.006 - Database (landscape video library)- example of a film documentary sheet// [source: author]

Page 22: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

22

Technical suggestions in making a VIDEO LANDSCAPETense / dynamic / diverse

landscapeCalm / unitary / balanced

landscape.Concept Determines the organization of video image and is defined by the

relationship between - motion - sound - and significance.Landscape role In particular, documentary and sub-textual roles - completes the

objective context with subjective valence to find and communicate specific values of the landscape (description of landscape ambience).The use of symbols and metaphors to underline the concept and transmit meaning.

Composition Organizing the image in order to transmit a message.A complicated framework imposes a simplified composition.Using different proportions in terms of light, colour or predominant character lines.

Compositional means

Contrast, asymmetry, fragmentation, stiffness, dynamic composition.Image composition rate is subject to editing, and images may be blurred.

Unity, symmetry, balance, static composition.Clear plans, studied composition in terms of structural, light and colour.The use of filters and effects, metaphorical and symbolic images.

Lines The skyline - 1/3 of the image - opening; 2/3 of the image - oppression.Compositions with vertical or diagonal strong dominants.Straight lines, upward.

Compositions dominant horizontal.Curves, continue, downward.

Light and colour Shadow and light. Colour - concept theme.The dramatic role of light (time of day the filming).Accents, cold tone proportion, varied.

Balance, proportion warm tone, uniform.

Framing effects Ellipse - induced image or sounds outside the frame.Synecdoche - adding detail, intercalation with a close-up.Symbol - suggest an idea through an image.Depth of field - to highlight the movement in frame or the action carried out on several levels.

Plans Exchange between long shots and close-ups, plans of shorter lengths, especially close-ups.Deep space - elements in foreground (depth of filed).Using multiple plans simultaneously.

Using a small number of shots, with great length, mainly long shots, stacked in depth.Working with a single montage plan.

Angle of framing Divers angle of framing, dynamic exchange: horizontal, at different levels of framing, plonge, contra plonge.

The angles of framing are mostly horizontally or plonge.

Page 23: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

23VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Shooting techniques Travelling, handheld camera, accelerated movement, sudden, zooms, rapid exchange of shots and filming techniques.Movement in frame.

Shooting with a fixed camera, panoramas, slow movements.Uses 1 or 2 filming techniques.Slow motion frame (or still frames).

Editing Support landscape concept through editing logic, marking important points through counterpoint or contrast.

Narrative structure Development on multiple lines with multiple points of intensity; asymmetric organization, interlaced generic.

Linear development, single point of intensity that marks the most important element; classic, symmetric organization.

Montage Expressive montage: analytic, contrast (sound, ideologic). Narrative Montage: alternate, parallel.

Expressive montage: analytic, symbolic, similarity.Narrative Montage: alternate or successive.

Rhythm Normal speed, fast and ultra fast, with breaks, uneven.

Slow or normal speed, uniform, linear, descriptive.

given by: the movement in space, plans length, composition complexity, movement in frame.

Transitions Cut, pan. Fondue (fade), fondu-enchaîné, shutter and iris.

Transitions The similarity of processes, psychological or ideas connections.Motion, sound contrast or counterpoint.

Composition, image, sound counterpoint connections.

Sound Juxtaposition in counterpoint or contrast with the image, sound or image ellipses.Mostly diegetic. Diegetic, extradiegetic.

Shoot length Framing: frame detail: between 1frame/ 1s (often repetitive) and 1frame / 3-6s; Overall frames: between 8-11s;

Shooting technique: the movie from fixed: between 2-4s; coated frames moving (travelling or panning) with speed and image rate between 5-7s / 10-20s;

The point is that the narrative structure: 3-5 frames / s and 1frame / 2-3s- for high intensity points; between 4-10s - for breaks;

Plans with text inserts: between 2-7s to 14s depending on quantity and complexity.

The proposed clip, as a possible way of making a video landscape, emphasizes landscapes

multidimensional perception, haptic, through details. These are the ones that compose the

image, whether textures (mineral or vegetable), elements of urban furniture or different

users (how space is used). The video shows in parallel, a full picture of the landscape and its

Fig. A.007. - Table of technical suggestions in making a video landscape // [source: author]

Page 24: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

24

breakdown into three sections, details at different height. It was selected University Square in

Bucharest to discuss, in an urban square, the relationship between pedestrian and cars.

In achieving this, it was taken into account the grid of technical suggestions detailed above

and the conclusions of comparative analyses presented in Chapter IV, detailing levels referring

to concept, narrative structure and editing technique, rhythm and shooting technique, image

composition and length frames.

A video landscape does not necessarily provide a true picture of the analysed site (because

of the composed framework and the multiple and simultaneously perspectives from different

angles), but rather a subjective vision, already passed through a personal filter and express

the movement in space, the roles of textures and how sound influences the perception (ratio

between details and overview). The montage captures the elements filmed by the camera that

emphasize different landscape attributes: a public space structured and strongly influenced

by traffic, the adjacent noise, a space that lives, however, both as transit line and as a meeting

point.

In a context where video is more and more an universal medium of expression, information and

communication, a research on how the landscape can be investigated and represented through

film is considered to be appropriate.

The proposed tools for this study (the video landscape and the database) are integrated in the

sensitive reading process of the landscape in some steps (these are not exhaustive and may be

supplemented) which refers to the analysis and [re]presentation.

Video survey - it refers to the direct recording of the landscape through video camera.

It materializes, in particular, the third line of the landscape survey (Stan, 2012, 75-76), the

survey of landscape dynamics. It reflects the real-time dynamics of the landscape (the dynamic

landscape and movement in landscape) through montage, that can expand to other temporal

scales.

Documentation on how to represent landscapes in film, through the landscapes video

Page 25: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

25VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Landscape perception through details (2014)[source: images from the clip: https://vimeo.com/107322790

Fig. A.008. - Extract from the decomposition scheme for the presented video landscape // [source: author]

Page 26: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

26

library. The documentation is proposed to be achieved in two directions:

• at conceptual level - the landscape role, its significance, and cultural value;

• at compositional, technical, and expressive level, (plastic) - image composition, filming techniques and editing logic;

Video landscape - the description of a narrative landscape (Stan, 2012, 77) through film.

Editing is performed according to the concept that is intended to be presented by using the

database and the grid of technical suggestions.

Fig. A.009 - Steps used in the sensible landscape reading, through film as a tool for analysis and representation: [1] - using the database for documentation on a landscape design object (similar topics, types and landscape issues, approaches, concepts, locations (cities ), historical periods, movements, etc.); [2] - landscape analysis in situ; [3] - making a surveying video (image study) using various elements of composition and camera techniques (variety of shooting angles, framing, light, time of day, camera movements that provide the material for the next phase of editing) ; [4] documenting the logic of a montage through the database and finding the most suitable techniques to highlight the analysed landscape concept; [5] making a video (film editing) as a conceptual representation of the landscape; [6] - complete the database with the realised video landscape. // [source: author]

Page 27: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

27VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Therefore, the use of the video landscape as a tool for analysing and [re]presentation in the

sensible reading of the landscape involves the investigation of space through the video camera

and the research of how a space can be represented through and in a film.

The relationship between film and landscape is complex and may be embodied in

several directions. The present study aimed to approach the film as a tool of analysis and

representation of the landscape (for professionals), by researching how it is presented in various

film productions in terms of significance, composition, filming techniques and the organization

of the montage.

If we consider the film as a tool in landscape design, besides the analysed directions:

• the documentary role of a film - in landscape analysis - as witness of the landscape evolution, as a moving picture (compositional elements and stylistic affects translated to be applied in landscape design);

• film as a language of landscape presentation and representation - as a video survey or montage (video landscape).

it detaches other two possible future research lines:

1. The film - communication language for the landscaping project - for a wider range of

people (not just for specialists but also for public administration, media, users - beneficiaries).

The film study and its decoding and transmitting role of a message for nonprofessionals - film

as the landscape project representation in dialogue with the public. This direction requires

a separate approach especially since the legislative framework requires the existence of a

participatory dialogue, a public consultation on the project.

The specialized language of urban and landscape planning can often be not enough to be able

to convey the proposed vision, a representation through a language, today common, highlights

the opportunities for the study in this direction.

The establishing tools of representation influence not only the entire decision making process and the media, but also subsequently the entire design and building process. The discrepancy between drawings and plans as tool of commercial and political seduction and the same documents used as a basis for the production and construction of environments has demonstrated concrete the limitation about the way we think of a city and its landscape today. (Girot 2006, 92)

Page 28: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

28

2. Using film in spatial design concept of the landscape, not just as a tool for analysis

and representation - translating the cinematographic concepts into spatial and organisational

concepts, approaches in landscape intervention, narrative principles translated into ways of

discovering the space - the scenographic perception of the designed space.

This direction involves completing the series of interdisciplinary concepts (sequence /

sequentially, script, storyboard) and others such as cuts, filming techniques, working with plans

and their depth or editing logic.

Like landscape design, film creates landscapes, it is not just reproducing them (as other areas

dealing with the study of landscape do), but it also producing them (Corner, 1992). Cinema

conceptualizes spaces, creates artificial spaces starting from fragments of real space (Martin,

1981, 233). Therefore, studying the relationship between film and landscape regarding the

design process is seen as desirable, even essential of the field under study.

Page 29: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

29VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

bibliography, filmography

Concepts about space and landscape

Calcatinge, A., 2013. Conceptul de peisaj cultural. Contribuţii la fundamentarea teoretică. Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu”: Bucharest.

Enache, C., 2010. Peisajul urban în contextul tehnologiei informaționale; Studiu asupra implicaţiilor şi tendinţelor noilor tehnologii în structura urbana tradiţională. Ph. D. Thesis. Unpublished.

Faye, P., et alii, 1974. Sites et Sitologie. Editions: J.-J. Pauvert: France.

Foucault, M., 1984. „Des Espaces Autres”. Architecture / Mouvement / Continuité, October. [online] Accessible at: http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/foucault1.pdf [15 January 2014].

JRC, 2014. Joint Research Centre Science Hub - For Learn. Methodology - Scenario building. [online] Accessible at: http://forlearn.jrc.ec.europa.eu/guide/4_methodology/meth_scenario.htm#Definition [28 June 2014].

Leach, N., 2006, Uitaţi-l pe Heidegger. Paideia: Bucharest.

Lefebvre, H., 1991. The production of space. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford.

Mihali, C., 2001. În loc de introducere. Spațiul urban: diseminat, miniaturizat, polivalent. In Mihali, C., ed. 2001. Altfel de spații. Studii de heterotopologie. Paideia: Bucharest. pp. 5-14.

Pitte, J. R., 1992. Histoire du paysage francais. Taillandier: Paris.

Pleşu, A., 2009. Pitoresc şi melancolie. Ediţia a III-a. Humanitas: Bucharest.

Sârbu, C., 2009. Peisajul cultural. [lectures notes, Ist year, MPT]. [powerpoint - unpublished].

Stan, A., 2006. Teoria si istoria peisajului. [lectures notes, 2nd year, Course VI]. [powerpoint –unpublished].

Stan, A., 2009. Peisajul periferiilor urbane – revitalizare peisageră a zonelor periferice. Editura Universitară Ion Mincu: Bucharest.

Stan, A., 2012. Devenirea peisajului. Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu”: Bucharest.

Virilio, P., 2000. A Landscape of Events. Translated from French by Julie Rose. MIT Press Cambridge: Massachusetts, London, England.

Waterman, T., 2009. The Fundamentals of Landscape Architecture. AVA Publishing SA: Lausanne, Switzerland.

Perception and image

Arnheim, R., 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Revised and supplemented edition. [original publication 1954] University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.

Baudrillard, J., 1981. Simulacres et simulation. Galilée: Paris.

Castells, M., 1936. The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Malden, Massachusetts, USA.

Eftenie, M., 2006. Psihologia spațiului construit urban. [lecture notes] Second edition. Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu”: București.

Ionică, L., 2000. Imaginea vizuală. Aspecte teoretice. Editura Marineasa: Timişoara.

Lynch, K., 1960. The image of the city. The MIT Press: Cambridge.

Page 30: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

30

Merleau-Ponty, M., 2004. The World of Perception. Translated from French by Oliver Davis [original publication 1948]. Routledge: Oxfordshire.

Representation

Arnheim, R., 2012. Forța centrului vizual. Un studiu al compoziției în artele vizuale. Translated by Luminița Ciocan [original publication 1988]. Polirom: Iași.

Bouleau, C., 1979. Geometria secretă a pictorilor. Translated from French by Denia Mateescu. [original publication 1963] Meridiane: Bucharest.

Buhmann, E., Ervin S. şi Pietsch M., 2012. Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture 2012 at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences. H. Heenemann GmbH&co. KG: Berlin.

Corner, J., 1992. Representation and Landscape. In Swaffield, S., ed. 2002. Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. pp. 144-165.

De Mèredieu, F., 2005. Arta şi noile tehnologii. RAO: Bucharest.

Mcluhan, M., 1975. Galaxia Gutenberg. Translated from English by L. and V. Năvodaru [original publication 1962]. Editura Politică: Bucharest.

Moholy-Nagy, L., 1967. Painting, Photography, Film. Lund Humphries London.

Popa A., 2014. Photography as Exercise of Memory in Order to Reasses, Recompose and Revive Landscapes. In Crăciun, C., Bostenaru Dan, M., eds. 2104. Planning and Designing Sustainable and Resilient Landscapes. Springer: Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London. pp.61-73.

Rees, A.L., White D., Ball S., Curtis D. eds., 2011. Expanded Cinema: Art, performance, Film. Tate Publishing London.

Concept on history, psychology and film theory

Arnheim, R., 1957. Film as art. University of California Press: Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.

Bazin, A., 1949. Funcția dramatică a decorului. In Voiculescu, E., ed. 1967. A șaptea artă. Scrieri despre arta filmului. Translated by Margareta Andreescu, Simona Balamace and Stela Kintescu. Vol II. Editura Meridiane: Bucharest. pp. 215-221.

Bazin, A., 1968. Ce este cinematograful? Translated from French by Ervin Voiculescu. Editura Meridiane: Bucharest.

Cavalcanti, A., 1950. Note pentru o istorie a decorului de film. In Voiculescu, E., ed. 1967. A șaptea artă. Scrieri despre arta filmului. Translated from French by Margareta Andreescu, Simona Balamace and Stela Kintescu. Vol II. Editura Meridiane: Bucharest. pp. 222-231.

Chapman, J. 2005. Comparative Media History. Polity Press: Cambridge.

Colebrook, C., 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Allen&Unwin. Crows Nest: Australia.

Deacă, M., 2012. Teoria filmului. [lecture notes, an I, SITT] [unpublished].

Deleuze, G., 1997. Cinema 1. The Movement-Image. Translated from French by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Fifth edition . [original publication 1983]. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.

Dreyer, C. Th., 1955. Filmul în culori și filmul colorat. In Voiculescu, E., ed. 1967. A șaptea artă. Scrieri despre arta filmului. Translated from French by Margareta Andreescu, Simona Balamace and Stela Kintescu. Vol II. Editura Meridiane: Bucharest. pp. 232-235.

Moussinac, L., 1925. Ritm sau moarte. In Voiculescu, E., (ed.), 1967. A șaptea artă. Scrieri despre arta filmului. Translated from French by Margareta Andreescu, Simona Balamace and Stela Kintescu. Vol II. Editura Meridiane: Bucharest. pp. 284-288.

Sadoul, G., 1961. Istoria cinematografului mondial. De la origini până în zilele noastre. Tranlated by D. I. Suchianu.

Page 31: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

31VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

[original publication 1959] Editura Științifică: Bucharest.

Scheneider S. J. 2005. 1001 de filme de văzut într-o viață. translated from English by Justina Bandol, Smaranda Câmpeanu, Roxana Dascălu, Irina Horea. Second edition, Editura RAO: China.

Tashiro, C.S., 1998. Pretty pictures: Production Design and the History Film. University of Texas Press: Austen.

Stoichiță, V. I., 2013. Efectul Sherlock Holmes. Trei intrigi cinematografice. Humanitas: Bucharest

White, I., 2009. Life itself. The „Problem” of the Pre-Cinema. In Comer, S., ed. 2009. Film and Video Art. Tate Publishing: London. pp. 13-25.

Wilson, J., 1961. Film Literacy in Africa. In Canadian Communication. Vol. I, no.4.

Film analysis

Bălțatu, V.I., 1958. Cum se face un film. Editura tehnică: Bucharest.

Barbaro, U., 1947. Scenariul și problemele filmării. In Voiculescu, E., ed. 1967. A șaptea artă. Scrieri despre arta filmului. Tranlated by Margareta Andreescu, Simona Balamace and Stela Kintescu. Vol II. Editura Meridiane: Bucharest. pp. 66-71.

Bellour, R., 2000. The Analysis of Film. Edited by Constance Penley. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, USA.

Pintilie, L., 2001. După-amiaza unui torționar. In Doinaș, Șt. Aug., ed. 2001. Filmul. Secolul 21. Nr. 10-12/2001. Uniunea Scriitorilor din România, Fundația Culturală Secolul 21 și Editura Fundației Pro: Brașov. pp.223-238.

Martin, M., 1981. Limbajul cinematografic. Translated from French by Matilda Banu and Georege Anania. [original publication 1954] Editura Meridiane: Bucharest.

Vanoye, F., Goliot-Lété, A., 1995. Scurt tratat de analiză filmică. Translated from French by Otilia-Maria Covaliu and Carmen Dumitriu. [original publication 1993] ALL Educațional: Bucharest.

Yale Film Studies, 2002. Film Analysis Guide. [online] Accessible at http://classes.yale.edu/film-analysis/ [19 June 2014].

Film and architecture

Affron, C., Affron, M.J., 1995. Sets in motion: ArtDirection and Film. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick.

Akçay, A., 2008. The Architectural City Images in Cinema: The Representation of City in Renaissance as a Case Study. [online] School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University. Accesibil la http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609699/index.pdf [20 august 2014].

Bergfelder, T., Harris, S., Street, S., 2007. Film Architecture and the Transitional Imagination. Set Design in 1930s European Cinema. Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam.

Boake, T.M. 2005. Architecture and Film: Experiential Realities and Dystopic Futures. [online] Accessible at http://www.academia.edu/3437846/Architecture_And_Film_Experiential_Realities_And_Dystopic_Futures [1 September 2014].

Cairns, G., 2007. Crossing the boundaries of film and architectural pedagogy. Journal of Pedagogic Development. [e-journal] 2(2). Accessible at http://www.beds.ac.uk/jpd/volume-2-issue-2/crossing-the-boundaries-of-film-and-architectural-pedagogy [27 August 2014].

Cinecity, 2014. Architectural Film Project. Architectural Ideas Explored in One Minute Films. [online] Accessible at http://www.thecinecityproject.com/ [4 September 2014].

Fundația Culturală Secolul 21, 2001. Spațiul în Film. Colocviu organizat de Fundația Culturală Secolul 21 and Editura Fundației Pro, 26 September, Bucharest. Translated and published in Doinaș, Șt. Aug., ed. 2001. Filmul. Secolul 21. No. 10-12/2001. Uniunea Scriitorilor din România, Fundația Culturală Secolul 21 and Editura Fundației Pro: Brașov. pp.13-42.

Page 32: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

32

Godard, J.-L., 1972. Godard on Godard. Secker & Warburg: London.

Hasnaș, A., 2002. Spirit și grafie în arta spectacolului. Editura Universitară „Ion Mincu”: Bucharest.

Higham, N., 1999. Cinem(a)rchitecture: signifying the imaginary city in film. [blog] 1 September. Accessible at http://architettura.it/movies/19990901/ [28 August 2014].

Ingersoll, R., 1992. Cinemarchitecture. In Design Book review. vol. 24, Spring.

Kaçmaz Erk, G., 2004. Architecture as Symbol: Space in Wim Wenders’ Cinema. Built Spaces. The Cultural Shaping of Architectural and Urban Spaces. [e-journal] 9(1). Accessible at http://www.cloud-cuckoo.net/openarchive/wolke/eng/Subjects/041/Kacmaz-Erk/kacmaz_erk.htm [4 September 2014].

Newman, D., 2012. Polite Resistance and the Dimensions of Narrative – Week Six Response [blog] 27 February. Media and Architecture 2012. A Graduate Seminar in Media Studies at The New School. Taught by Shannon Mattern. Accessible at http://www.wordsinspace.net/media-architecture/2012-spring/?p=482 [4 September 2014].

Pallasmaa, J., 2000. Lived Space in Architecture and Cinema. [online] First chapter of the book: The Architecture of Image: Existential Space in Cinema. Rakennustieto: Helsinki. Accessible at http://www.ucalgary.ca/ev/designresearch/publications/insitu/copy/volume2/imprintable_architecture/Juhani_Pallasmaa/index.html [22 August 2014].

Rattenbury, K., 1994. Echo and Narcissus. A.D., Architectural Design, special issue, Architecture and film. no. 112, pp. 35.

Storm, D., 2011. Transmutations. Video is more. Dissertation Thesis - Master of Architecture. University of Detroit Mercy School of Architecture. [online]. Accessible at https://archive.udmercy.edu/handle/10429/565 [1 August 2014].

Film and Landscape

Bruno, G., 2002. Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. Verso: London, New York.

Calciu, D., 2011. Parkphobia. Urban Situation. [blog] 27 April. Accessible at https://situatiiurbane.wordpress.com/2011/04/27/parcphobia/ [26 August 2014].

DMUD-RNYU, 2014. Digital Modeling for Urban Design - Reading New York Urbanism Cours. [online] http://dmudrnyu.com/about/ [19 June 2014].

ERASMUS Intensive Programme, 2014. Integrated Planning and Design for Sustainable Urban Peripheries in Europe [online]. Accessible at http://european-peripheries.imla-campus.eu/Main_Page [27 August 2014].

Fuhriman, C., 2009. Cinematic Representation of Landscape: The (Reel) Korean Demilitarized Zone. [online] Middle States Geographer, 2009, no. 42, pp. 100-106. Accessible at http://www.msaag.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/11_FUHRIMAN.pdf [19 August 2014].

Girot, Ch., 2004. Movism: Prologue to a New Visual Theory in Landscape Architecture. In: Koll-Schretzenmayr, M., Keiner, M. and Nussbaumer G., eds. 2004. The Real and virtual Worlds of Spatial Planning. Berlin: Springer. pp. 199-206.

Girot, C., 2006. Vision in Motion: Representing Landscape in Time. In: Waldheim, C., ed. 2006. The Landscape Urbanism. Princeton Architectural Press: Princeton. pp. 87-103.

Girot, Ch., 2014a. Landscape: Beyond the Margin of Vision. In Deriu, D., Kamvasinou, K., Shinkle, E., eds. 2014. Emerging Landscapes: Between Production and Representation. Ashgate Publishing: Farnham, Surrey, England. pp. 81-94.

Girot, Ch., 2014b. Wahlfach MediaLab. Serendipity. Landscape Video. [videoblog] Accessible at http://girot.arch.ethz.ch/videoblog/ [26 August 2014].

Hellmann, C. and Weber-Hof, C., 2007. On Location – Famous Landscapes in Film. C.J. Bucher Verlag GmbH: Munchen.

Page 33: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

33VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

Hopkins, J. 1994. A mapping of cinematic places: icons, ideology, and the power of (mis)representation. In Aitken, S.C., Zonn, L.E., eds. 1994. Place, Power, Situation, and Spectacle: A Geography of Film. Rowman and Littlefield: Totowa, NJ, USA. pp. 47-66.

Keiller, P., 2007. Film as spatial critique. [online] Accessible at http://roundtable.kein.org/sites/newtable.kein.org/files/Keiller_FilmAsSpatial%20Critique.pdf [15 October 2014].

Lefebvre, M. 2006. Landscape and film. AFI Film Readers. Routledge.

McKie, S., 2009. The Role of Landscape in Film: More than a Visual Backdrop. [online] Accessible at http://internetvideo.sys-con.com/node/1087361 [25 November 2013].

Melbye, D., 2010. Landscape Allegory and Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, USA.

Popescu, T., 2007. Șapte povești în căutarea unui loc. Scenariu de film ca instrument alternativ de lectură a spațiului public. In Zahariade, A., M., Oroveanu A. eds. 2007. ACUM2. Spațiul public și reinserția socială a proiectului artistic și arhitectural. Editura Universitară Ion Mincu: Bucharest. pp. 204-207.

RNYU, 2011. Reading New York Urbanism Cours. [online] Accessible at http://rnyu2011.com/about/ [19 June 2014].

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, 2011. Landscape video – transcription, experience, narration. [online] Accessible at http://www.multimedia.ethz.ch/conferences/2010/landscapevideo [3 October 2012].

Tewdwr-Jones, M., 2013. Modern Planning on Film: Re-shaping Space, Image and Representation. [online] Accessible at http://ced.berkeley.edu/bpj/2013/08/modern-planning-on-film-re-shaping-space-image-and-representation/ [29 November 2013].

Data Base

Film Topics (2013). Landscape and Cinema at CU. [blog] Accessible at http://filmtopicslandscape.tumblr.com/ [25 May 2014].

Fotache, M., 2009. Dialecte DB2, Oracle și Visual FoxPro. Second edition. Editura Polirom: Bucharest.

Landscape and cinema (2012). RTVF 398 Issues in Radio, Television, and Film: Landscape and Cinema at Northwestern University. [blog] Accesibil la http://landscapecinema.tumblr.com/post/18485550172/before-the-quake-the-collapse-of-culture-in-robert [25 May 2014].

Lovink, G., 2008. The Art of Watching Databases. Introduction to the Video Vortex Reader. In Lovink, G., Niecerer, S., eds. 2008. Video Vortex Reader: Responses to YouTube. Institute of Network Cultures: Amsterdam. pp. 9-12.

Lungu, I., 2005. Baze de date oracle limbajul SQL. Digital course. [online] Accessible at http://www.biblioteca-digitala.ase.ro/biblioteca/carte2.asp?id=458&idb=11 [25 May 2014].

Movie Locations (2014). The Worldwide Guide to Film Locations. [online] Accessible at http://www.movie-locations.com/ [25 May 2014].

Spoer, D., 2013. Database Lesson #1 of 8 - Introduction to Databases. [online] Accessible at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9KEBexzcM [25 mai 2014].

Spoer, D., 2013. Database Lesson #2 of 8 - The Relational Model. [online] Accessible at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyGVhx5LwXw [25 May 2014].

Urban Film (2014). Urban/planning film review. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [blog] Accessible at http://eglenn.scripts.mit.edu/urbanfilm/ [25 May 2014].

Velicanu, M., Lungu, I., Muntean, M. et alii, 2002. Oracle. Platformă pentru bazele de date. Editura Petrion: Bucharest.

Research and compilation methods

Borden, I. şi Rüedi Ray, K., 2006. The Dissertation. An Architecture Student’s Handbook. Second edition.

Page 34: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

34

Architectural Press: Oxford, Burlington.

Chelcea, S., 2003. Metodologia elaborării unei lucrări ştiinţifice. Comunicare.ro: Bucharest.

Eco, U., 2000. Cum se face o teză de licenţă. Translation by G. Popescu. Second edition. Collection: Biblioteca italiană. Pontica: Constanţa.

Lynch, K., 1960. The image of the city. The MIT Press: Cambridge.

Nijhuis, S., Van Lammeren, R. and Van Der Hoeven, F., 2011. Exploring the visual landscape. IOS Press: Amstredam.

Sistem de citare Harvard – Anglia Ruskin University, 2013. Harvard System. [online] Accessible at http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/referencing/harvard.htm [14 September 2013].

Whyte, W. H., 1980. The social life of small urban places. Project for Public Spaces: New York.

1895 Auguste Lumière Louis Lumière

Sortie des Usines Lumière à LyonL’Arriveé d’un train en gareLa Places des Cordeliers à LyonLes ForgeronsL’Arroseur Arrosé Repas de bébé Sortie de la pompe Mise en batterieAttaque du feu SauvetageLe Débarquement du Congrès de Photographie à Lyon

1896 Jeux d’enfants dans une rueFrancisque DoublierM. Perrigot

Couronnement du tsar Nicolas II

1897 Auguste Lumière Louis Lumière

L’arrivée d’un train à La Ciotat

1896 Georges Méliès Escamotage d’une dame 1901 Ferdinand Zecca Histoire d’un crime 1902 Georges Méliès Voyage dans la Lune 1903 Edwin S. Porter The Great Train Robbery1915 D. W. Griffith The Birth of a Nation 1917 Karl Freund Die Faust des Riesen

1919 Mauritz Stille Herr Arnes pengar

1920 Robert Wiene Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari

1922 F. W. Murnau Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens

Robert J. Flaherty Nanook of the North

1923 Abel Gance La roue

1924 René Clair Entr’acte11

1925 Sergei Eisenstei Bronenosets PotemkinStachka

1926 Robert J. Flaherty Moana

Vsevolod Pudovkin Mat

Page 35: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

35VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

1927 Alan Crosland The Jazz SingerFritz Lang MetropolisWalter Ruttman Berlin: Die Sinfonie der GrosstadtM. C. CooperE. B. Schoedsack

Chang: A Drama of the Wilderness

1928 Victor Sjöström The Wind1929 Luis Buñuel

Salvador DalíUn Chien Andalou

Dziga Vertov Chelovek S KinopparatomAdalberto Kemény São Paulo, Sinfonia da MetrópoleJoris Ivens Regen

De Brug1930 Aleksandr Dovzhenko Zemlya1931 M. C. Cooper

E. B. SchoedsackKing Kong

1933 Gustav Machaty Extaz1935 Edgar Anstey

Arthur EltonHousing Problems

Aleksandr Dovzhenko Aerograd1936 Charlie Chaplin Modern Times

Jean Renoir Une partie de campagne

1937 Giacomo Gentilomo Sinfonia di Roma

John Taylor The Smoke Menace1939 Ralph Steiner

Willard Van DykeThe City

John Ford Stagecoach1940 Alfred Hitchcock Rebecca1941 Orson Welles Citizen Kane1942 John Eldridge New Towns for Old1944 Henri Storck Boerensymfonie / Symphonie paysanne1945 Roberto Rossellini Roma, città aperta1946 John Ford My Darling Clementine

Jill Craigie The Way We LiveRoberto Rossellini PaisàVittorio de Sica Sciuscià (Ragazzi)

1948 Alfred Hitchcock RopeH.C. Potter Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream HouseVittorio de Sica Ladri di biciclette

Roberto Rossellini Germania, anno zero

John Huston Treasure of the Sierra Madre

1950 Billy Wilder Sunset BoulevardAkira Kurosawa RashomonAnthony Mann Winchester ’73

1952 Giuseppe De Santis Roma, ore undiciAkira Kurosawa Ikiru

1953 Arne Sucksdorff Det stora äventyret1954 Alfred Hitchcock Rear Window

Page 36: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

36

1955 Pather Panchali SatyajitIvo Michiels Roland Verhavert

Seagulls Die in the Harbour

1957 Michelangelo Antononi Il Grido1958 Jacques Tati Mon Oncle

Alfred Hitchcock Vertigo1959 North by Northwest1960 John Ford Sergeant Rutledge

Michelangelo Antonioni L’Aventura

1962 Stan Brakhage Dog Star Man

David Lean Lawrence al Arabiei

1963 Alfred Hitchcock The Birds

1964 Michelangero Antonioni Il deserto rosso

1965 David Lean Doctor Zhivago

1966 Ingmar Berhman PersonaMichelangelo Antonioni Blowup

1967 Dennis Hopper Easy RiderJacques Tati Playtime

1968 Stanley Kubrick 2001: A Space Odyssey1970 Alejandro Jodorowsky El Topo

Michelangelo Antonioni Zabriskie Point1971 Nicolas Roeg Walkabout1974 Roman Polanski Chinatown1975 Andrei Tarkovski Stalker

Peter Weir Picnic at Hanging RockTheo Anghelopoulos O Thiassos

1976 Carol Corfanta Serenadă pentru etajul XII1978 Woody Allen Manhattan

Francis Ford Copola Apocalypse now1981 Christian Schocher Reisender Krieger1982 Godfrey Reggio Koyaanisqatsi

Ridley Scott Blade RunnerWerner Herzog Fitzcarraldo

1984 Eric Rochant Comme les doigts de la main1985 Terry Gilliam Brazil1987 Win Wenders Der Himmel über Berlin1995 James Benning Deseret1992 Ron Fricke Baraka1999 Andy Wachowski

Lana WachowskiThe Matrix

2001 Lucian Pintilie După-amiaza unui torționar2002 Joel Schumacher Phone Booth

The Chemical Brothers Michel Gondry

Star Guitar

Fernando Mierelles Cidade de DeusMartin Scorseset Gangs of New YorkYimou Zhang Ying xiong

Page 37: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

37VIDEO LANDSCAPE - FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION

2003 Ki-duk Kim Bom yeoreum gaeul gyeoul geurigo bom2006 Jim Brown

Gary BurnsRadiant City

Tarsem Singh The Fall2009 James Cameron Avatar2010 Christopher Nolan Inception2011 Terrence Malick Tree of Life

Marina Marque Phe Pulse of a NeighbourhoodGustavo Taretto MedianerasWin Wenders Pina

2012 Steven Briand Shunpo2013 Gore Verbinski The Lone Ranger

Erick Flores Garnelo City sounds

Page 38: Irina Pata_VIDEO LANDSCAPE. FILM AS A TOOL FOR LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS AND [RE]PRESENTATION