TABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 19(4):271 ...
IRCF Reptiles & AmphibiAns · IRCF ReptIles & AmphIbIAns • Vol 17, no 2 • JUn 2010 In thIs...
Transcript of IRCF Reptiles & AmphibiAns · IRCF ReptIles & AmphIbIAns • Vol 17, no 2 • JUn 2010 In thIs...
IRC
FReptiles & AmphibiAns
C o n s e r v at i o n a n d n at u r a l H i s t o r y
t2JUN
2010
VO L
NUM
sPeCial issue, Part ii: a tribute to Henry s. Fitch
IRCF ReptIles & AmphIbIAns • Vol 17, no 2 • JUn 2010 In thIs IssUe
A heated conflict between two male Grass Frogs (Rana temporaria) and one male Common toad (Bufo bufo). Clutches of frog eggs are visible in the water. see related note on p. 82.
Iva
n v
erg
ner
When Red-sided Garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis parietalis) in northerly climes hibernate, hundreds of them aggregate in the same hibernaculum. During the winter, this apparently serves to prevent them from freezing and they also have access to each other for breeding in the spring.
Lor
ra
Ine
Swa
nSo
n
An adult Red milk snake (Lampropeltis triangulum syspila) constricting and swallowing a large Woodland Vole (Microtus pinetorum). see related note on p. 94.
Step
hen
L. B
ar
ten
back Cover: Jay Fleming
Yellow-bellied sea snakes (Pelamis platurus) are the only sea snake in the eastern pacific ocean, and the only species that is present on the pacific Coast of Central America. see related article on p. 69.
Front Cover: Vipul Ramanuj
A King Cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) eating a hump-nosed pit Viper (Hypnale hynale) at the Agumbe Rainforest Research station in the Western Ghats of India. see related article on p. 95.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 65tAbleoFContents IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • VOL15, NO 4 • DEC 2008 189TABLE OF CONTENTS
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
F E A T U R E A R T I C L E S
Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190
The Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198
R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E S
The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida
.............................................Brian J. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212
C O N S E R V A T I O N A L E R T
World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 More Than Mammals ...................................................................................................................................................................... 223 The “Dow Jones Index” of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 225
H U S B A N D R Y
Captive Care of the Central Netted Dragon ....................................................................................................... Shannon Plummer 226
P R O F I L E
Kraig Adler: A Lifetime Promoting Herpetology ................................................................................................ Michael L. Treglia 234
C O M M E N T A R Y
The Turtles Have Been Watching Me ........................................................................................................................ Eric Gangloff 238
B O O K R E V I E W
Threatened Amphibians of the World edited by S.N. Stuart, M. Hoffmann, J.S. Chanson, N.A. Cox, R. Berridge, P. Ramani, and B.E. Young .............................................................................................................. Robert Powell 243
CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 NATURAL HISTORY RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Reports on Natural History ................................. 247 NEWBRIEFS ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 248 EDITORIAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 251 FOCUS ON CONSERVATION: A Project You Can Support ............................................................................................... 252
Front Cover. Shannon Plummer.Totat et velleseque audant mo estibus inveliquo velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque moditia erere nonsedis ma sectiatur ma derrovitae voluptam, as quos accullabo.
Back Cover. Michael KernTotat et velleseque audant mo
estibus inveliquo velique rerchil erspienimus, quos accullabo. Ilibus
aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque
moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia-tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as
IRC
F
REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSC O N S E R V AT I O N A N D N AT U R A L H I S T O R Y
T a b l e o f c o n T e n T s
special Issue: a Tribute to Henry s. fitch, Part II
R E M E M B R A N C E
What’sinaname?.......................................................................................................................................Marian L. Griffey 66
A R t i C l E s A N d N o t E s
newperspectivesontheecologyandnaturalhistoryoftheYellow-belliedseasnake(Pelamis platurus)inCostaRica:DoesprecipitationInfluenceDistribution?...................................................................................................................... ...............................Harvey B. Lillywhite, Alejandro Solórzano, Coleman M. Sheehy III, Spencer Ingley, and Mahmood Sasa 69
observationsandCommentsontheDietofthemany-bandedKrait(Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus)intaiwan............ ..................................................................... Jean-Jay Mao, Gerrut Norval, Chih-Liang Hsu, Wei-Han Chen, and Ray Ger 73
blocked-flightAggressivebehaviorinsnakes..................................................................................................D. Bruce Means 76
terrestrialburrowinginnestingsoftshellturtles(Apalone mutica and A. spinifera)... Michael V. Plummer and J. Sean Doody 79
ApparentCompetitionbyGrassFrogs(Rana temporaria)andCommontoads(Bufo bufo)forbreedingsites.....Ivan Vergner 82
submergedCallingbyoregonspottedFrogs(Rana pretiosa)RemotefrombreedingAggregations................ Jay Bowerman 84
suburbanizationofaCentraltexasherpetofauna................................................................................ Frederick R. Gehlbach 87
Redmilksnaketakinglargepreylateintheseason.................................................................................. Stephen L. Barten 94
observationsonaWildKingCobra(Ophiophagus hannah),withemphasisonForagingandDiet........................................ ...................................... Dhiraj Bhaisare, Vipul Ramanuj, P. Gowri Shankar, M. Vittala, Matt Goode, and Rom Whitaker 95
t R A v E l o g u E
thebackdoorturtlesoftortuguero....................................................................................................................... Don Moll 103
F E A t u R E A R t i C l E
turtlesintheDust:effectsofhands-onscientifictrainingonaGroupofbehaviorallyAt-riskstudents’Knowledgeandempathy..................................................................................................... J. Alan Sosa, Oscar Reyes, and Gad Perry 108
C o M M E N t A R y
IsWildlifemanagementbusinessorConservation—AQuestionofIdeology..................................................Jesus A. Rivas 112
i N v A s i v E s P E C i E s
IslandInvaders:InvasiveReptilesandAmphibiansintheturksandCaicosIslands.R. Graham Reynolds and Matthew L. Niemiller 116CubanbrownAnoles(Anolissagrei)inst.maarten.................................................................................. Axel Fläschendräger 121KnightAnoles(Anolis equestris)onGrandCaymanIsland...........Mat DaCosta-Cottam, Kristan D. Godbeer, and Tim Austin 122
B o o K R E v i E W
Timber Rattlesnakes in Vermont and New York: Biology, History, and the Fate of an Endangered SpeciesbyJonFurman........... ..................................................................................................................................................................George R. Pisani 123
v nAtURAlhIstoRYReseARChRepoRts:summariesofpublishedReportsonnaturalhistory......................................124v neWsbRIeFs................................................................................................................................................................................125v eDItoRIAlInFoRmAtIon.....................................................................................................................................................127
66 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 GRIFFeY
evenwhenvisitorswerepresent,Dr.Fitchwasmeticulousaboutrecordingdata.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 67RemembRAnCe
nearly14yearshavepassedsinceIfirstheardthename“Dr.henryFitch,”invariablyspokenintonesofnear-reverence.thename,often
abbreviatedtosimply“Fitch,”isalwaysspokensoftly,andfollowedbythoughtful,staring-at-your-shoessilence—evenmoresosincehisdeath.hisabsenceintheherpetologicalcommunityissorelyfelt,evenbythosewhoknewhimonlyvicariouslythroughthelegacyofhiswork.Forthoseluckyenoughtohavehadacloserrelationshipwiththeman,thescientist,(dareIsay)theLegend,hislossleavesanindeliblewoundontheheart. Whenfirstintroducedtothename,Iwasonlya“spouseof,”partofagroupofperhapsfour,maybesixherpetologistsandwildlifestudents,and
brandnewtothisworldofamphibian-and-reptilelegend,lore,science,andpioneers.likethetipofaniceberg,thetoneandsilence,thatinward-turningfocusandgentlesmilethataccompaniedthename“Fitch,”foretoldofamanwhoIsensedmustbeagiantamongthesemenofscience. WheneverIasked:“WhoisthisDr.henryFitch?”theanswercamebackunvaried:“You’lljusthavetomeethim!”luckily,Idid… Forthisoccasion,Ihadagainjoinedmyhusband,someofhiscol-leagues,andnumerousstudentsforafieldtripwithintheUniversityofKansasFitchnaturalhistoryReservation1.Westoodinjitteryclumps,shufflingourfeetandstaringoffintothegreeningwoods.Wemadehalt-ingconversationwithoneanotheraswewaitedforourguidetoarrive. mymentalimageofaniceberg-sizedGreekheroassumeditstruehumanform.Anaged,frail-looking,stooped-backmancamegingerlytowardus,leaningonhiswell-usedwalkingstick.hestoodinabeamofmorningsunlight,likeanancientturtlebaskinghimselfintowakefulnessandoptimummobility.mycompanionsandIeasedbackabit,yieldinghimasmuchofthesun’senergyaspossible.Yetweremainedcloseenoughthatoursightandhearingcouldstillperceiveeveryparticleofhim. herewasFitch,atlast!thelegend.Afraillittleman? nevertheless,allthatIhadbeenledtobelieveprovedtrue.meetinghimthatday,withnoexchangeofwordsbetweenus,toldmesomethingofthemysterysurroundingthatparticular toneofvoice,thatairofinnercontemplation and silent reverence that surrounded anymentionofthename“Fitch.”Cumulative,spontaneoushonorandrespectrippledthroughandaroundourlittlegrouplikeaninvisiblewave. Idon’trememberwhatDr.Fitchsaidtousthatmorningbeforewesetoffonourhikethroughhisbelovedwoods.myears,Ithink,wentdeafinthemidstofmarvelouswonder.Withthesunbacklightinghisthinbodyandhiswhitehairaglow,dozensofbutterfliessuddenlyappeared,lightingonhisshirt,athisfeet,orhoveringaroundhim.Asheturnedtogo,hedidsowithawarenessofthistenderentourage,movinggentlyandcarefullysoasnottoharmorfrightenhislittlefriends.onceinmotion,however,hiswingedshrouddissipatedasquicklyasithadarrived.WeloadedintotwovansandheadeddeeperintotheReservation. Dr.Fitchwasthefirsttodisembark.hewastednotimeshepherdingpeople,countingheads,oractingthetourguide.oncehisfeettouchedtheearth,hemoved—andhemovedlikeGandhi,stridinginalong-practicedrhythmthattookhimalmostoutofsightbeforewefollowerscouldassembleourthoughts.Acrossthemeadow,upthehill,throughthebriarpatch,overthecrest,intothemixed-oakwoodlands,andskimmingthetalusandlime-stoneboulders,hetraveledwithalltheeaseofafieldmouseonfamiliarterrain. Awkwardly,westraggledintothesmallclearingbeneathacopseoftreeswhereDr.Fitchstoodsmiling,patientlywaiting,observingwithsomeamusementeachperson’sbreathlessarrival.Wegatheredaroundhim,anxioustoquellourhuffingandpuffingandmissnothingofwhatthesoft-spokenmanhadtosay.Wetotteredonthesharp-edgedbouldersthatringedthetinyclearing,jockeyingforasomewhatlevelplacetostandinanefforttodisguiseourmere-humancondition.
What’s in a name?marianl.Griffey
5222nW56thCourt,Gainesville,Florida32653
photographsbyC.KennethDodd,Jr.
1theUniversityofKansasrenameditsnaturalhistoryReservationin1986tohonorhenryFitch.
R e m e m b R a n c e
Apermanentarrayofdriftfencesandtrapsledtomanycapturesandrecapturesduringthe50-yearstudyoftheReservation’ssnakesandlizards.Checkingthetrapswasadailyritual.
68 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 GRIFFeY
“this,”Fitchsaidwhenallhadarrived,“isagoodplaceforCopperheads.”severaleyesrolleddownwardtowardfeetnowfrozenandprecariouslyperchedatopcountlesspocketswhereslenderCopperheadsmighteasilycoil.ImentallycalculatedthedifficultyIhadingettingdownhilltothisscenicglen,andthelikelihoodofsurefailureingettingmynow-wearied,oxygen-deprived,flatlander’shideup-n-outintheeventthatsuchabeastielayundermyboulder. “here’sone,”Fitchannouncedcalmly.hiseyeswerefocusedonasmallishbouldernearhisownfeet.“I’llgetit,”heoffered,slowlyleaningtowardtheground.onethinarmstretchedoutinvitinglytowardthesnakeasheleanedhisbentframeeverclosertomotherearthandeden’sscourge,hishand,arm,andfacecomingincrementallynearertohisdeadlygoal. Anaudible,collectivegasprosefromthecircleofon-lookers.“Dr.Fitch,”someonesqueaked,“letoneofusgetit.” “no,”repliedtheunperturbedleaningman.“I’llgetit.” Andsohedid.Ascalmlyandgentlyasamotherwithanewborn,FitchmadehisacquaintancewiththeCopperheadbytherock,pickeditupwithouttheuseofhookorstaff,andrevealedhisprize,facebeamingwithpurejoy.hehelditfirmlybehindtheheadinawell-practiced,strong,andconfidenthand.Weallbreathedagain,butthefrownsofconcernforhissafetydidnotrelax. “oh,”hesaid,andmyheartskippedabeat(asI’msuremanyothersdid),fearingthathehadbeenbitten.but,no,hisexclamationhadsimplybeenoneofmildself-admonishment.“Iforgotmysnakebag,”hesaid.“I’llhavetotakethisoldgirlbacktothevantogetherstats.” Copperheadsecurelyinhandandwithoutfurtheradieu,Dr.Fitch set toagainwithhisGandhi-stride.skimmingoverthetalus,heledusanothermerrychase…uptheslope,beneaththetrees,throughthebriars,overthecrest,downacrossthemeadow.bythetimeweallhadreassembledontheroadbythetwovans,Dr.Fitchhadfoundhissnakebagandhadhalfthestatsrecorded.“Done,”heannounced,beamingatusallwithhissmile.“I’lltakeherbacknow.”
“letoneofus,”someoneoffered,perhapsconcernedforthethinlegsthatwouldhavetotraversetherouteback…andlikelyCopperheadcous-inscamouflagedinthedappledlightbeneaththetrees. “I’lldoit,”Fitchstatedgently,butwithafirmnessthatbroachednodiscussion.“sheandIareoldfriends,”headded,inthatsametoneofrever-enceforthesnakewithwhichI’dheardhisownnamespoken.Andoffhewent,acrossthemeadow,overthecrestintothebriars,andoutofsight.Afewheartbeatslater,hishoaryheadagaintoppedthehorizon.hismissionaccomplished,Isawhimpausebrieflyonthecrestamidstthebriars,hisfaceturnedskywardwithalookoflovethatencompassedthewholeearth.Dr.henryFitch.thenameechoesinmymemorywithatoneofhonorandakindoflovethatIcan’texplain.WordscannotdescribewhatI(anddoubtlesssomanyothers)continuetofeelfortheman,thescientist,and(Yes!)thelegend.everybutterflyremindsmeofthatgrandadventureintheKansaswoodsonasummerdayin1996.thoseluckyenoughtohavemethimunderstandmyinabilitytodescribehim.noonecanputhenryFitchintomerewords;hehadtobeexperienced. thosewhowillonlymeethimthroughreadinghisbiography,hislifetimeofscientificwritings,orothers’memoirswillnotbegintounder-standevenhalfthemanbehindthename—butthosewhotakethetimetohearthesubtextwithinthestoriesofthisremarkablegiantamongmenwilldoubtlessbeblessedfortheeffort.theyandfuturegenerationsmayonlymakeatip-of-the-iceberg,second-handacquaintancewiththemarveloushenryFitch,butohwhatadiscoverythatwillbe!thatsortofexperiencewillstillyourheart,turnyourthoughtsinward,andbroadenyourvisiontoencompassthewholeearth.Itwillmakeyousmileintothesky,callallthelittlelivingthings“oldfriend,”andcauseyoutostareatyourowntwofeetinsilentwonder,hopingthatyoutoocanlearntowalkwithaGandhi-strideandmakeaFitch-differenceinaworldmostlyunseenandun-experiencedbythe“civilized”masses. Couldtherebeanybetterwaytohonorthemanthantowalkinhislegendaryfootsteps?
An“oldfriend.”Dr.FitchcametoknowmanyoftheresidentsoftheFitchnaturalhistoryReservation.
Dr.FitchmeasuringaCommonGartersnake(Thamnophis sirtalis).
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 69YelloW-bellIeDseAsnAKeInCostARICA IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 69
new Perspectives on the ecology and natural History of the Yellow-bellied sea snake
(Pelamis platurus) in costa Rica: Does Precipitation Influence Distribution?
harveyb.lillywhite1,Alejandrosolórzano2,Colemanm.sheehyIII3,spencerIngley1,andmahmoodsasa4
1Departmentofbiology,UniversityofFlorida,Gainesville,Florida32611UsA2serpentarionacionalandmuseumofZoology,UniversityofCostaRica,sanJose,CostaRica
3Departmentofbiology,Universityoftexas,Arlington,texas76019UsA4InstitutoClodomiropicado,UniversityofCostaRica,sanJose,CostaRica
“...narrativeaccountsofrarelyobservedeventsinspecies’lifehistoriessometimeshavemuchmeritandvalue.evenasingleobservationmayconstituteavaluablecontributionandmaybeabreak-throughinunderstandingthespecies’ecology.”
Henry S. Fitch, 1987
morethan60 speciesof sea snakeshave evolvedand radiated tooccupytropicaloceanichabitats.themajorityofthese(50+spe-
cies)areentirelymarineanddonotintentionallyleaveseawater(heatwole1999).nonetheless,fewerthan2.5%ofallsnakespeciesliveinmarineenvironments,andtheevolutionarytransitionfromterrestrialtomarine
habitatsisconsideredtobeparticularlydifficult(lillywhiteetal.2008a).osmoregulatorychallengesareparamount,andallmarinespeciesofsnakes(indeedallmarinereptiles)haveevolvedsaltglandstoassistwithelimina-tionofexcesssaltthatisingestedwithdietorincidentaldrinking.Waterbalanceisarelatedbutdifferentissue,andthebodywaterthatislostpas-
Fig. 1. Pelamis platurus onaCostaRicanbeach.thesesnakesaresometimesstrandedonbeachesduetostrongoffshorewindsthatcausethesnakestodrifttowardtheshore.
Ale
jAn
dr
o S
oló
rzA
no
70 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 lIllYWhIteetAl.
sivelytotheseaorinfecesandsecretionsmustbereplenishedeitherfromfreshwatersourcesorindirectlyfromfoodorseawater.theindirectsourcesinvolvefurtherloadingofsaltsand/ormetabolitesthatmustbeeliminatedwithfurtherlossesofsomewater. Recently,lillywhiteetal.(2008b)demonstratedthatthreespeciesofseaKraits(Laticauda spp.)requirefreshdrinkingwatertoreplacebodywaterdeficits,asthesesnakesdehydrateinseawaterinspiteofthefactthattheypossesssaltglands.evidently,inthesespecies,saltglandsareimportanttoionbalancebutareinsufficienttomaintainwaterbalanceinmarineenvi-ronments.basedoncurrentliterature,representativespeciesbelongingtofouroutoffivemajorlineagesofmarinesnakeshavebeenshowntorequirefreshwater(orverydilutebrackishwater)forthemaintenanceofnormalwaterbalance(lillywhiteetal.2008b).therefore,changesinpatternsofprecipitationrelatedtoglobalwarmingmayhaveimportantimplicationsforthesurvivalanddistributionofmarinesnakes. Whetherso-called“trueseasnakes,”whicharefullymarinespecies,requirefreshwaterforwaterbalanceremainstobedetermined.Wearecurrentlyinvestigatingthisquestion,andwehavesomeevidenceforafresh-waterrequirementintheYellow-belliedseasnake,Pelamis platurus (Figs.1&2).basedonlaboratoryinvestigationsofwaterandsodiumfluxesinthisspecies,DunsonandRobinson(1976)foundthatfastingPelamis dehydrateinseawater(−0.4%bodymassperday),andtheydocumenteddrinkingoffreshwaterwhenitwasofferedtodehydratedsnakes.snakeskeptinseawa-tersurviveforlongperiodsiffedonfreshwaterfish(DunsonandRobinson1976;As,pers.obs.),butwhetherthesesnakescansurviveforlongperiodsifkeptinfullseawaterandfedonmarinefishremainsunclear.
yellow-bellied sea snakes (Pelamis platurus)thisspeciesofseasnakehasthebroadestdistributionofanysnake.ItrangesfromthecoastalwatersofeasternAfricaalongthesouthernAsiancoaststoJapan,southwardandeastwardtoAustraliaandislandsofthewesternpacific,thenceeastwardtotheAmericas.Itistheonlyseasnakethathasreachedtheeasternpacificocean,andistheonlyspeciesthatispresentonthepacificCoastofCentralAmerica.thissnakeisentirelymarine,givesbirthtolivingyoungatsea,andispelagicinhabits.Itisaspeciesofsmalltomoderatesize,reachingamaximumlengthofabout1m(solórzano2004).Pelamis hasbeenregardedasa“passivesurfacedrifter”thatisoftenwaftedbycurrentstolatitudesatwhichitisnotabreedingresident(Dunsonandehlert1971).becauseofitscosmopolitandistribu-tionandpelagichabits,thisspeciesofseasnakeisofcentralimportancetotestingthehypothesisthatfreshwaterisrequiredforphysiologicalwaterbalanceinmarinehabitats. observationsofothersandourowncollectingexperiencesinCostaRicaindicatethatPelamis arefoundingreatestnumbersinassociationwithoceanic“slicks”(Kropach1971,1975;Dunsonandehlert1971).slicksaresmoothglassystreaksformingdriftlinesintheoceanresultingfromtheaccumulationoffoam,floatingplantparts,andotherdebris(flotsam;Fig.3).theyoccurinconvergencezoneswhereorganicmaterialaccumulates,flattensthewater,andcreateszonesofconcentratedbiologicalactivity.slicksmaycontaincontaminatefilmsoforganicoilsprobablyderivedfromdiatoms,andtheybecomediscerniblebecauseoftheirdampingeffectonsmallwavelets.theconvergencezonesarecreatedbyavarietyofphysicalprocessesandcurrentssuchasinternalwavesandeddies(ewing1950).slicksarebiologicallyimportantbecauseplanktonbecomeconcentratedintheconvergencezonesandcreategoodplacesforzooplanktonandfishestofindfood.Indeed,slickshavebeenregardedasbiologicalcommunities.theycanalsobeharmfultosealife,however,becausetheyalsoconcen-tratenoxiousdebrisandpollutants.slickscanberelativelysmallandshort-lived,buttheycanalsoformdriftlinesextendingforhundredsofmetersorkilometers.theyarelikelyagentsfavoringdispersalofseasnakes,buttheirdynamicsinthiscontextareverypoorlyunderstood.Weproposethreehypothesesforwhyseasnakesassociatewithoceanicslicks.First,averypopularnotionintheliteratureisthatslicksprovideimprovedfeeding
opportunitiesduetooccurrenceoffishesseekingshelterbeneaththefloat-ingdebris(Kropach1975,heatwole1999).Asecondhypothesisisthatconvergenceofwatersconcentratesfloatingseasnakesjustasitdoesfloat-ingdebris,whichwouldbeapurelypassivephenomenon.Insupportofthisidea,othershaveconjecturedthatPelamis probablydoesnotactivelyseekoutslicks(Dunsonandehlert1971).Athirdhypothesisiscamouflage,fortheseasnakesresemblesomeofthefloatingpartsofplantsbothincolorandinform,oftenmimickingfloatingstickstowhichfishareattracted(hunterandmitchell1968).thiscouldreducepredationonseasnakesaswellasfacilitatetheirfeedingopportunities.Kropach(1975)alsosuggestedthatgatheringatslicksincreasedmatingopportunitiesforseasnakes,butthiswouldseemdependentononeoftheotherreasonsfortheprimaryassociationofsnakeswithslicks.
the Coastal distribution of Pelamis in Costa RicaYellow-belliedseasnakesaregenerallydistributedalongtheentirepacificcoastofCostaRica,andareusuallyfoundwithin1–20kmofthecoast(Voris1983,solórzano2004).especiallydensepopulationshavebeennotedatseverallocationsinrelativelycloseproximitytothecoastline.theseincludeGolfodepapagayoandassociatedbays(bahíaCulebraandseveralplayasimmediatelytoitssouth),Caboblancoatthesouthendofthenicoyapeninsula,watersbetweenbahíadeCoronadoandthenorthernendoftheosapeninsula(puntasanJose),andwithintheGolfoDulcenearthesouthernendofthecountry.thesepopulationsareknowntousfromtheexperiencesofoneofus(As)orfromliterature.otherdensepopulationsalmostcertainlyoccurelsewhere,buthavenotbeenbroughttoourattention. Wearepresentlyexploringthehypothesisthatthecoastaldistribu-tionofPelamis ispartlydependentontheavailabilityoffreshwater.thiswas suggested for theeuryhalinemarine snakeAcrochordus granulatus (lillywhiteandellis1994)andwasdemonstratedtobethecasewherespeciesofLaticauda,or“seaKraits,”havebeenstudiedonalocalscaleatorchidIsland,taiwan(lillywhiteetal.2008b).threespeciesofLaticauda areabundantatsiteswithaccesstoafreshwaterspringorestuary,whereasfewornosnakesarefoundatstrictlyseawatersites.moreover,theabun-danceofthesesnakesalsovarieswithrainfall,andfewersnakesarefoundduringperiodsofdroughtorlowrainfall.Asdiscussedelsewhere(lillywhiteetal.2008b),Laticauda spp.exhibitapatchydistributionthatcorrelateswithlow-salinitytropicalwatersinthewesternpacificandIndianoceans.Also,apreliminaryassessmentofseasnakedistributionintropicalsouthAsiaandtheIndo-Australianregionrevealsthatthespeciesdiversityofallseasnakespeciescorrelateswithmeanannualrainfall(lillywhiteetal.2008b). severalsourcesoffreshwaterarepotentiallyavailabletoseasnakes.Inadditiontoprecipitation,theseincludesprings,estuaries,ortemporaryoutflowsfromthecoast.heavyrainfallformsatemporaryfreshwaterlensattheoceansurfaceduetothedensitydifferencefromseawater,andsuchlensesaretheonlysourceoffreshdrinkingwaterintheopenseaawayfromtheimmediatecoastline.thefactthatPelamisinCostaRicacanbefoundnearertothecoastduringthedryseason(As,unpubl.obs.)ispotentiallyrelevant;andinmexico,evenmorepronouncedseasonalchangesindis-tributionareevident(hlandCs,unpubl.obs.;seealsoDuellman1961).thesesnakesmightbemovingtocloserassociationswithcoastalestuariesduringperiodicdroughts,basedonknowledgeofsiteswithwhichwearefamiliarfromourownfieldwork.Pelamis areoccasionallyreportedfromestuaries(shuntov1966).Indeed,variousspeciesofseasnakesareobservedinestuaries,andtheysometimesmoveconsiderabledistancesintorivers(Dunson1975).Alternatively,Pelamis might appeartobemoreabundantnearerthecoastduetoprevailingstrongerwindsduringthedryseason,whichcouldwashthesesnakesontotheshoreattimes(solórzano2004).numerousreputableobservershavedescribedstrandingsofPelamis onbeaches,usuallyinassociationwithstorms(Dunsonandehlert1971).slicksalsomightformingreaternumbernearthecoastalbaysduringthe
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 71YelloW-bellIeDseAsnAKeInCostARICA
Fig. 2. Pelamis platurus illustratingsomeofthevariationofcolorpattern,whichvariesfrommostlyblacktoblackandwhiteoryellowtoallyellow.
HA
rv
ey B
. lil
lyw
Hit
e
72 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 lIllYWhIteetAl.
dryseason.thesehypothesesremaintobetestedwiththealternativeexpla-nationsinmind.
Conclusionsomemarinesnakes,includingcertainseasnakes,havebeenshowntobedependentonaccesstofreshwaterforwaterbalanceandoccuringreaterabundancenearfreshwatersources(lillywhiteetal.2008b).Wedonotknowwhetherthemajorityofseasnakespecies,whichareentirelyaquatic,
alsorequirefreshwater.physiologicalstudiessuggestthatthepelagicspe-ciesPelamis platurus dehydratesinseawaterandwilldrinkfreshwaterinthelaboratory(DunsonandRobinson1976).thus,onemightinferthatPelamis requiresfreshwaterforwaterbalance,butthisaspectofitsphysiol-ogyremainstobeproperlytestedanddocumented.themovementsofthispelagicspeciesarelargelyunknown,butsomefeaturesofitsdistributioninCostaRicasuggestthatitmightassociatemorecloselywithcoastalsourcesoffreshwater,suchasestuaries,duringtimesofperiodicdrought.thepotentialinfluenceoffreshwateronmovementsofthisspeciesmightaffectmetapopulationdynamicsinimportantwaysthatremaintobeexplored.Wearecurrentlyinvestigatingthephysiology,distribution,andgeneticstructureofPelamis populationsinthesecontexts.Knowledgeofthewaterrequirementsofseasnakes—andPelamis inparticular—willenhanceourunderstandingofthedistributionofthesemarinereptilesandhowtheymightrespondtofuturechangesinthedistribution,intensity,andperiod-icityofprecipitation.
AcknowledgementstheresearchonwhichthisarticleisbasedwassupportedbythenationalGeographicsociety,Committee forResearch andexploration (grant#8058-06tohbl), thenationalscienceFoundation(grant#Ios–0926802tohbl),andagrantfromtheexplorersClub(tosI).WearegratefultoAdánbarreraforassistancewithboattransportationandlocatingofseasnakesinCostaRica.
Literature CitedDuellman,W.e. 1961.the amphibians and reptiles ofmichoacán,mexico.
University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Natural History 15:1–148.
Dunson,W.A.1975.Adaptationsofseasnakes,pp.3–19.In:W.A.Dunson(ed.),The Biology of Sea Snakes.Universityparkpress,baltimore.
Dunson,W.A.andG.W.ehlert.1971.effectsoftemperature,salinity,andsur-facewater flowondistributionof the sea snakePelamis.Limnology and Oceanography 16:845–853.
Dunson,W.A.andG.D.Robinson.1976.seasnakeskin:permeabletowaterbutnottosodium.Journal of Comparative Physiology b108:303–311.
ewing,G.1950.slicks,surfacefilmsandinternalwaves.Journal of Marine Research 9:161–187.
Fitch,h.s.1987.thesinofanecdotalwriting.Herpetological Review 18:68.
heatwole,h.1999.Sea Snakes. KriegerpublishingCo.,malabar,Florida.
hunter,J.R.andC.t.mitchell.1968.Fieldexperimentsontheattractionofpelagicfishtofloatingobjects.Journal du Conseil (Conseil international pour l’Exploration de la Mer)31:427–434.
Kropach,C.1971.seasnake(Pelamis platurus)aggregationsonslicksinpanama.Herpetologica 27:131–135.
Kropach,C.1975.theYellow-belliedseasnake,Pelamis,intheeasternpacific,pp.185–213.In:W.Dunson(ed.),The Biology of Sea Snakes.Universityparkpress,baltimore.
lillywhite,h.b.andt.m.ellis.1994.ecophysiologicalaspectsofthecoastal-estu-arinedistributionofacrochordidsnakes.Estuaries 17:53–61.
lillywhite,h.b.,C.m.sheehyIII,andF.ZaidanIII.2008a.pitviperscavengingattheintertidalzone:Anevolutionaryscenarioforinvasionofthesea.BioScience 58:947–955.
lillywhite,h.b.,l.s.babonis,C.m.sheehyIII,andm-Ctu.2008b.seasnakes(Laticauda spp.)requirefreshdrinkingwater:Implicationsforthedistribu-tionandpersistenceofpopulations.Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 81:785–796.
shuntov,V.p.1966.DistributionofseasnakesinthesouthChinaseaandeastIndianocean.Zoolicheskij Zhurnal 45:1882–1886.
solórzano,A.2004.Snakes of Costa Rica. Institutonacionaldebiodiversidad(Inbio),CostaRica.
Voris,h.K.1983.Pelamis platurus, pp.411–412. In:D.h.Janzen(ed.),Costa Rican Natural History.theUniversityofChicagopress,Chicagoandlondon.
Fig. 3.slicksseennearplayadelCoco,CostaRica.(A)Anarrowslickidentifiedbyfoamydriftline.(b)Flotsamanddebrisassociatedwithaslick.(C)Abroaderslickwithoutdebris;notethecalmwaterinthecenterofthephotograph.
HA
rv
ey B
. lil
lyw
Hit
e
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 73DIetoFthemAnY-bAnDeDKRAIt
observations and comments on the Diet of the many-banded Krait
(Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus) in TaiwanJean-Jaymao1,Gerrutnorval2,Chih-lianghsu1,Wei-hanChen1,andRayGer1
1DepartmentofForestry&naturalResources,nationalIlanUniversity,no.1,sec.1,shen-lungRd.,Ilan,taiwan260([email protected])2Appliedbehaviouralecology&ecosystemResearchUnit,Departmentofenvironmentalsciences,
UnIsA,privatebagX6,Florida,1710,RepublicofsouthAfrica
themany-bandedKrait(Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus;Fig.1)occursnaturally inburma,theIndo-Chinesepeninsula,southern
China,hainan,hongKong,andtaiwan(U.s.Departmentofthenavy1991,ZhaoandAdler1993).Wefoundadead-on-road(DoR)maleon2november2007onthenorthernCrossRoad(Routeno.7)closetominchi(elevation1,021m;tWD97,n24.614164°,e121.482272°),YilanCounty,northerntaiwan.snout-ventlength(sVlinmm),tail-length(tlinmm),andbodymass(bming)were740mm,100mm,and98.9g(excludingstomachcontents),respectively.Weimmediatelynoticedthatanundigestedsnake’stailandthekrait’sownheartwereprotrudingfromthedamagedpartoftheupperthroatregion(Fig.2).Dissectionrevealedtwoophidianpreyitemsinthedigestivetract,ajuvenilemale
mountainWolfsnake(Lycodon ruhstrati ruhstrati;sVl260mm,tl82mm,bm6g)andanadultfemalemountainKeelback(Pseudoxenodon stej-negeri stejnegeri;sVl490mm,tl88mm,bm41.1g).theanteriormostportionsofbothpreyitemswerepartlydigested,whichindicatedtheyhadbeeningestedinheadfirstpositions(Fig.3). lueetal.(2002)suggestedthatthecolorationofL. r. ruhstrati isaformofbatesianmimicry,causingittoresembleB. m. multicinctus,althoughthesetwospeciesdifferintheirdefensivebehavior(norcal[sic]andmao2006).mao(1970)reportedcannibalisminB. m. multicinctusintaiwan.therefore,thekrait-resemblingcolorationofL. r. ruhstratimayprovideadegreeofprotectioninmostpredatorencounters,butnotagainstpredationbyB. m. multicinctus.
Fig. 1.themany-bandedKrait(Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus)intaiwanoccursinavarietyofhabitats,manyofwhich(e.g.,lowgrassyareas,ricepaddies,irrigationditches)areassociatedwithwater.
Ger
ru
t n
or
vA
l
74 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 mAoetAl.
Pseudoxenodon s. stejnegerioccursmainlyinmountainousregions atelevationsofabout1,000mabovesealevel,butB. m. multicinctususuallyoccursatlowerelevations.pope(1935)reportedB. m. multicinctusat700minKuatun,mainlandChina,andassumedthatthatwasthespecies’maxi-mumelevationaldistribution.Kuntz(1963)statedthattheyoccurprimarilyatlowelevations(below600m)intaiwan,andlueetal.(2002)surmisedthatthissnakespeciesoccursmainlyataltitudesbelow500m,andthattheyonlyrarelycanbefoundat500–1,000m.ourobservation,however,cannotconclusivelyprovethatB. m. multicinctusoccursnaturallyinminchi,becausesomesnakes,especiallytheChineseCobra(Naja atra),many-bandedKrait,andorientalRatsnake(Ptyas mucosa)arereleasedbycertainreligiousgroupsalongRouteno.7,especiallybetweensze-lanandminchi(mao,pers.obs.;YoandWong2007).however,ourobservationdoesshowthatsnakescanbeexploitedbyB. m. multicinctusinmountainousareas. Kuntz(1963)indicatedthatB. m. multicinctusintaiwanoccursinavarietyofhabitats(e.g.,lowlandwoodedareas,bamboothickets,grassyareasassociatedwithwater,ricepaddies,irrigationditches),whereasmao(1970)simplystatedthatB.m.multicinctusprefershabitatsnearwater.many-bandedKraitsreportedlyfeedprimarilyonloaches,frogs,skinks,snakes,andmice(mao1993,Zhaoetal.1998).slowinski(1994)notedthat,comparedtotheotherkraitsinthegenus Bungarus(e.g.,B. ceylonicus,B. fasciatus,andB. caeruleus),B. m. multicinctusappearstobemorepiscivorous(63.16%)than ophiophagous(34.21%).thisconclusionwasbasedontheresultsofmao
(1970),whoalsoreportedthatlargerindividualstendtobemoreophiopha-gousthansmallerones,andthatpreycorrelatedcloselywithhabitat,althoughhefailedtoprovidehabitatdescriptions,andlistedonlytaoyuanCountyasacollectionsite.linetal.(1995),ontheotherhand,reportedB. m. multicinctustobemoreophiophagous,andattributedpiscivorytoontogeneticchangesindietortolow-elevationwetlandpollutionand/orhabitatdestructionforindustrialandcommunitydevelopment.basedonthepreyitemsreportedandthecollectionsitedescriptioninmao(1970),wedeterminedthatallpreytypesdescribedwerespeciesrestrictedtolow-elevationricepaddies,ponds,andadja-centareas.ourconclusionisfurthersupportedbydescriptionsofthedomi-nantlandutilizationofthetaoyuanareaatthattime(Yang1994),whichwereidealforwetlandfaunaandflora.thereportoflin(1995),incontrast,wasbasedonspecimenscollectedbyroadsampling,especiallyinmountainousareas.Wethusconcludedthattheapparentlycontradictorydietarypreferencesreportedbymao(1970)andlin(1995)maymerelyreflectsamplingofdif-ferenthabitats,leadingtothequestionwhetherhabitatheterogeneitycouldaccountforunusualpreyexploitationbyB. m. multicinctus. In1997–2009,weconductedecologicalstudiesonsnakesinwetland(e.g.,ricepaddies,drainageditches,ponds,streams,etc.)andnon-wetland
Fig. 2.the road-killedmany-bandedKrait,with its heart and the tail of aPseudoxenodon stejnegeri stejnegeriprotrudingfromthedamagedsectionofitsbody.
jeA
n-j
Ay
MA
o
Fig. 3.Fromlefttoright:theroad-killedBungarus multicinctus multicinctusanditsprey:Lycodon ruhstrati ruhstratiand Pseudoxenodon stejnegeri stejnegeri.notethepartlydigestedheadregionsofthesnakesthatwereconsumed.
jeA
n-j
Ay
MA
o
table 1.preyofmany-bandedKraits(Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus)collectedfromwetland(e.g.,pondsandricepaddies)andnon-wetland(e.g.,secondaryforestsanddrycultivatedareas)habitatsintaiwan.Anasterisk(*)indicatesthataspeciesoccursinbothhabitattypes,but,inthiscase,itwasrecordedfromabetelnutpalmplantation,whichisclassifiedasdrycultivatedland.References:1thisstudy;2mao1970;3Dayetal.1994;4linetal.1995;5maoetal.2006;6lin2008;7mao,unpubl.data;8norval,unpubl.data;9Ji-shouYang,perscomm.
Wetlands Non-wetlandssnakes Enhydris plumbea(n=9)2 Ramphotyphlops braminus (n=1)4
Bungarus m. multicinctus(n=1)2 Amphiesma stolatum*(n=1)7
Xenochrophis piscator(n=3)7 Cyclophiops major (n=2)3,7
Orthriophis taeniura friesei(n=1)8
Lycodon r. ruhstrati (n=1)1
Pseudoxenodon s. stejnegeri(n=1)1
Protobothrops mucrosquamatus(n=1)5
Viridovipera s. stejnegeri(n=2)7,9
lizards Plestiodon chinensis formosensis(n=1)2 Plestiodon elegans(n=2)4
Eutropis multifasciata (n=1)6 Sphenomorphus indicus (n=1)4
Fish Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (n=10)2
Fulta alba (n=14)2
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 75DIetoFthemAnY-bAnDeDKRAIt
areas(e.g.,drycultivatedlands,betelnutpalmplantations,mountainousandfoothillsecondaryforests,bamboothickets,etc.)oftaiwan.Apartfromchanceencounters,wealsomadeuseoftrapstocollectsnakes.Inwetlandhabitats,weemployedfloatingfunneltraps,baitedwithloachestocollectsemi-aquaticsnakes,and,exceptforthesewatersnakes(i.e.,ChineseWatersnake,Enhydris chinensis;plumbeousWatersnake, E. plumbea;RingedWatersnake,Sinonatrix annularis;oliveKeelback,S. percarinata suriki;andChequeredKeelback,Xenochrophis piscator),B. m. multicinctus wasthemostfrequentlycollectedspeciesandalwaysateallofthebaitinthetrap.Ashortdrift-fence/funnel-trapunitwasutilizedinnon-wetlandareas.Again,someB. m. multicinctus werecollected,althoughthenearestpermanentwatersources(e.g.,stream,wetland,pond,etc.)wereasfaras1kmaway.WecomparedthepreyitemsofallB. m. multicinctusencounteredinthesehabitatsandthoserecordedintheliterature(table1). exceptforspeciessuchastheFive-linedblue-tailedskink(Plestiodon elegans), IndianForestskink(Sphenomorphus indicus),ChineseGreensnake(Cyclophiops major),L.r. ruhstrati, P. s. stejnegeri,andChineseGreentreeviper(Viridovipera stejnegeri stejnegeri),whichoccurtomoderateeleva-tions(~1,000m)intaiwan,mostofthereptilianpreyofB. m. multicinctusarespeciesthatoccurinthelowlands(lueetal.2002).WealsofoundthatB. m. multicinctus fromwetlandhabitatspreymorefrequentlyonloaches,eels,andsemi-aquaticsnakesinthatorderoffrequency,whereasB. m. mul-ticinctusfromnon-wetlandormountainousforesthabitatspreyprimarilyonterrestrialorsemi-arborealsnakes(e.g., C. major;V. s. stejnegeri;taiwanhabu,Protobothrops mucrosquamatus,Fig.4)andterrestrialskinks(e.g., P. elegans,S. indicus). pope(1935)reportedpredationonmiceandfrogsbyB. m. multicinc-tus,butneitherofthesepreytypeswererecordedfromB. m. multicinctusinnature.Consumptionofmiceandfrogsappearstobebasedonobserva-tionsundercaptiveconditions;atbest,theyareraredietaryitemsofB. m.
multicinctus,despitereferencestothecontrary(e.g.,maki,1935).Undercaptiveconditions,wehaveobservedthatafewB. m. multicinctusacceptnewbornmiceasprey,whichsuggestsindividualvariationinacceptingvari-ousprey.Asforfrogs,eventhoughmaki(1935),Kuntz(1963),andmao(1970,1993)listedfrogsaspreyitemsofB. m. multicinctus,wewereunabletoconfirmthatpossibility.WhileworkingattheWildlifeAnimalshelter,nationalpingtungUniversityofscienceandtechnologyin2001,thefirstauthorneverobservedB. m. multicinctusattemptingtopreyontwosym-patricwetlandfrogs(CricketFrog,Fejervarya limnocharis andtaiwaneseFrog,Hoplobatrachus rugulosus)thatwereofferedasfood.FrogsrecordedinstomachcontentsofB. m. multicinctusmighthavebeenpreyofothersnakes,suchasthebuff-stripedKeelback(Amphiesmastolatum),E. plumbea,orX. piscator,whichhadbeeneatenbykraits.however,regardlessofpreytype(snakes,loaches,eels,orskinks),allshareonefeature—acylindricalbodyshape.thiswouldindicatethatB. m. multicinctusexhibitsapreferenceforcylindricalpreyitems,asdosomeseasnakes(e.g.,VorisandVoris1983). Inconclusion,preyavailabilityindifferenthabitattypesappearstobereflectedinthedietofB. m. multicinctus,withonlycylindricalbodyshapeasacommondenominator.Consequently,studiesdescribingpreytakenbykraitsshouldconsiderthetypeofhabitatfromwhichtheanimalsinques-tionweretaken.
Literature CitedDay,Y.t.,h.I.Wu,andC.C.Chen.1994.bandedKrait(Bungarus multicinctus)
fedonGreenVinesnake(Eurypholis major).Notes and Newsletter of Wildlifers2(3):4(inChinese).
Kuntz,R.e.1963.snakesoftaiwan.Quarterly Journal of Taiwan Museum16:17–19.
lee,W.J.andK.Y.lue.1996.Apreliminarystudyonthefoodhabitsofsnakesintaiwan.Biological Bulletin of the National Taiwan Normal University31:119–121(inChinese).
Fig. 4.Amany-bandedKraitcatchingandconsumingataiwanhabu(Protobothrops mucrosquamatus).
jeA
n-j
Ay
MA
o
76 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 meAns
lin,D.n.2008.noskink—IntroductionandpestcontrolofinvasiveMabuya multifasciata.Quarterly Journal of Nature Conservation61:30–36(inChinese).
lin,h.C.,K.F.hwung,andt.h.lu.1995.Foodofsnakesfromtaiwan.Notes and Newsletter of Wildlifers 3(2):19–21(inChinese).
lue,K.Y.,m.C.tu,andG.s.shang.2002.The Transition Kingdom — Guidebook of Amphibians and Reptiles of Taiwan.sWAn,taipei(inChinese).
maki,m.1931.A Monograph of the Snakes of Japan.Dai-Ichishobo,tokyo.
mao,J.J.,G.norval,W.b.Kung,andh.n.Chang.2006.Bungarus multicinctus multicinctus(many-bandedKrait).Diet.Herpetological Review37:350.
mao,s.h.1970.Foodofthecommonvenomoussnakesoftaiwan.Herpetologica26:45–48.
mao, s.h. 1993. Common Terrestrial Venomous Snakes of Taiwan. nationalmuseumofnaturalscience,specialpublicationno.5,taipei.
norcal[sic],G.andJ.J.mao.2006.mountainWolfsnake(Lycodon ruhstrati ruh-strati):Adescriptionofthedefensivebehavior.Sauria28(4):47–50(notethatthesurnameofthefirstauthorisatypographicalerrorfornorval).
pope,C.h.1935.The Reptiles of China.theAmericanmuseumofnaturalhistory,newYork.
slowinski,J.b.1994.thedietofkraits(elapidae:Bungarus).Herpetological Review25:51–53.
U.s.Departmentofthenavy(bureauofmedicineandsurgery).1991.Poisonous Snakes of the World.Doverpublications,newYork.
Vorish.K.andh.h.Voris.1983.Feedingstrategiesinmarinesnakes:Ananaly-sisofevolutionary,morphological,behavioralandecologicalrelationships.American Zoologist23:411–425.
Yang,s.l.1994.theirrigationsystemevolvedonthesocialandspatialorganiza-tionofthetaoyuanplateau.Unpublishedm.s.thesis,nationaltaiwannormalUniversity,taipei(inChinese).
Yo,C.W.andZ.J.Wong.2007.preliminaryinventoryofherpetologicalresourcesofnorthCrossRoad.Quarterly Journal of Nature Conservation59:38-47(inChinese).
Zhao,e.m.andK.Adler(eds.).1993.Herpetology of China.societyforthestudyofAmphibiansandReptiles.oxford,ohio.
Zhao,e.m.,m.h.huang,andY.Zong.1998.Fauna Sinica, Reptilia. Volume 3: Squamata, Serpentes.sciencepress,beijing,China(inChinese).
blocked-flight aggressive behavior in snakes
D.brucemeans
CoastalplainsInstituteandlandConservancy,tallahassee,Florida32303
everynaturalistaccumulatesfieldobservationsandexperiencesworthyofexpandingintofull-blownresearchprojects.moreoftenthannot,how-
ever,theinformationlanguishesundevelopedinmemory,paperpiles,andthesedays,computerfiles.someinterestingobservationsonsnakebehaviorIhavemadeovertheyearsareamongmymanyunfinishedprojects. experiencednaturalistsknowthatmostsnakesfleewhenencounteredinnature.moresedentary,slow-moving,orcrypticsnakeswillremainstillorcoiledinordertogounnoticed.Rattlesnakes,whendisturbed,coilandrattle.Afterawhile,theyalsomaymoveawayfromtheintruder,perhapscontinuingtorattleastheybreakoutoftheircoilandflee.Afewsnakes,however,dosomethingdifferent.
Fig. 2.ACottonmouthmouth-gapingasitcrawlstowardtheauthor.
jAM
eS v
Ale
nti
ne
Fig. 1.ACottonmouth(Agkistrodon piscivorus)“chasing”theauthorwhileengagedinaggressivebehaviorduringblockedflightwithheadraised,striking,flatteningitsbody,vibratingitstail,andmovingdirectlytowardtheauthor.thissnakedidnotfollowtheauthorwhenhesteppedaside,butracedtosafetyintothewaterbeyond.
KA
tHy
Ste
inH
eiM
er
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 77AGGRessIVebehAVIoRInsnAKes
thatdifferentbehaviorwas firstdisplayed tomewhenanadulteasternCottonmouth(Agkistrodon piscivorus conanti)roseuplikeacobraandmenacinglycrawledtowardmeinfrontofadozenstudents(Fig.1).IhadjustguaranteedmyfieldclassthatCottonmouthsdonotchasepeople.Inthosefewmoments,asIrapidlybackedupfromtheapproachingsnake,apotentialbehavioralstudywasborn(seeChapter8inmeans2008). Wehadencounteredthesnakeonewarmlateafternooninmay,whensnakes—andCottonmouthsespecially—aremostlikelytomove.Itwascrossingawide,sandyroadintheApalachicolanationalForestoftheFloridapanhandletheadjacentswampfromwhichtheCottonmouthhademergedwasdryingupfromaseveredrought,andthesnakeprobablywaslookingfornewaquatichabitatoradryingwaterholefromwhichtogorgeontheconcentratedaquaticanimals. Assooftenhappenswithsnakes,itstoppedcrawlingasmyvehicleapproachedandwasfullystretchedoutina“frozen”posture.IlinedupthestudentsontheroadshoulderfromwhichthesnakehadcomeandItookapositionontheotherside,blockingitsforwardmotion.ourmove-mentsstimulatedittocoilupanddoits“Cottonmouth”display,withitsattentionfocusedonme,whowasclosesttothesnakeandgesticulatingtothegroup.Afterafewminutes,thesnakesuddenlyroseupcobra-likeandbegancrawlingrapidlyatmewiththeforwardone-fourthofitsbodyraised. Withitsneckspreadslightly,thesnakecontinuedtoadvanceasIbackpedaled,makingafewstrikingparriesasitnearedmyfeet.WhenIsteppedsidewaysfromthesnake’strajectory(whichwasdirectlytowardaswampontheothersideoftheroad),Iwasgratifiedthatthesnakemain-taineditsoriginaldirectionanddidnotturntofollow(or“chase”)me.Its“aggressive”behaviorobviouslywasablufftoassistthesnakeinmakingitsgetawayintothesafetyoftheswamp. Realizing that this poorly trafficked, wide sandy road betweentwoswampsofferedanidealsitetostudythisbehavior,mywife,Kathysteinheimer, and I road-cruised this 0.5-km stretch ten times in thenext two years. she videotaped 16 episodes of me interacting withCottonmouths.Cottonmouths“chased”me10of17timesthatIblockedtheirmovement.Itsimplyappearstobebluffingbehavior,butaggressivenevertheless.Icallitshammed(bluffed)aggressionduringblockedflight.
Cottonmouthsengagedinsuchaggressiveflightexhibitedseveralcharacteristicbehaviors,includingcrawlingrapidlytowardme,raisingtheheadandneckofftheground,expandingthejaws,flatteningthebody,vibratingthetail,tongue-flicking,lungingandstrikingforward,andrarely,musk-squirting.Agreatdealofvariationexistsintheintensityofthesebehaviors.Afewdisplayedthebehaviorastheydashedtowardthecoveroftheroadsidevegetation.someassumedtheclassiccoil-upandmouth-gapedefensefirstandthenbrokeintoaggressiveflightwithinafewminutes. IwasabletoinitiateflightbehaviorinacoiledCottonmouthsimplybyflippingitoveronitsbackbymeansofmysnakehook.Uponrightingitself,thesnakeendeduplyinginastraightposition.Ittheneithercoiledagainandmouth-gaped,orfled,atwhichtimeIcouldstepinfrontofit.otherCottonmouthswererelativelyplacid,coilingrepeatedlyandrefusingtoflee.ofthe17,onehiditsheadunderitsbodywhencoiledandrefusedtobreakoutofthatposture.Anothermouth-gapedasitcrawledrapidlytowardme(Fig.2).AnotherinterestingbehaviorwenotedisthatwhenfleeingCottonmouthscrawledoutofthesandyroadbedandenteredtheroadsidevegetation,theyspeduptheirforwardmotionandbecameevenmoreanimatedintheiraggressivebluffing. Allenandswindell(1948)werethefirsttodescribeaggressiveflightintheCottonmouth:“onethreefooter,whenapproached,struckupwardsohardthatheliftedhisbodyofftheground.headvanced,coilingandstrikingrepeatedly,followingtheretreatoftheobserver.othershavebeenseentochargedeliberatelywithopenmouth.mostattackersseemtodosoinabluffingmannerratherthaninviciouspursuit.” morerecently,studieshaveanalyzedCottonmouthdefensivebehav-iorsinresponsetobeingsteppedonorapproachedclosely,andtobeingpickedupwithanartificialarm(GibbonsandDorcas2002,GlaudasandWinne2007).Inthesestudies,cagedsnakesorthosewithunrestrictedopportunitiestofleewerelesslikelytodisplayaggressiveflightbehavior.Apparently,thebehaviorismostlikelytobetriggeredwhenfree-rangingsnakesareblockedalongachosentrajectoryaftertheyarealreadyinflight. myintentioninvideotapingthese“chase”episodeswastodoastudyofCottonmouthbehaviorduringblockedflightbyanalyzingthefilmedsequences.Alas,whenIreturnedfromanoverseastrip,Idiscoveredthatthe
Fig. 3.AneasternCornsnake(Pantherophis guttatus)crawlingtowardtheauthor,strikingforward,asheblocksitsescapefromadirtroad.
d. B
ru
ce
MeA
nS
78 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 meAns
tapecontainingtheepisodeshadbeenaccidentallyoverwrittenwithsoapoperas,sotheprojecthasnotbeenresurrected.becausethetwoofuswerebusyvideotapingtheshort-lastingbehavior,wetookfewstillphotos,whichonlyshow“snapshots”ofthefullbehavior. overtheyears,Ihaveencounteredsimilarshammedaggressionduringblockedflightbyseveralspeciesofsnakes.thebehaviorisinducedonlywhenoneplacesone’sbodyinfrontofamovingsnake,blockingitsescape.manysnakes,especiallycolubrids,willturnandfleeinanotherdirection,butsomedonot.InsnakesassmallaspigmyRattlesnakes(Sistrurus miliarius barbouri),Istimulatedsimilarbluffedaggressionepisodesintwoofsevenindividuals.IevenencounteredaneasternCornsnake(Pantherophis guttatus)crossingaroadthatroseupandtriedtobluffmeoutofitsway(Fig.3).
InVictoriastate,Australia,Ideliberatelysteppedinfrontofacrawl-ingeasternbrownsnake(Pseudonaja textilis)andgotanothersurprise(Fig.4).notonlydiditrisecobra-likeandmovethreateninglytowardsme,butitalsoseemedpurposefullytoexaggeratetheundulationsofitsbodyintheloosegraveloftheroad.thisfast-movingsnakeisextremelyvenomousandresponsibleformoresnakebitedeathsinAustraliathananyotherspe-cies(Whitakeretal.2000).Fortunately,asIsteppedoutofitstrajectory,itdidnotturntowardmebutattemptedtomakegooditsescapeinthedirectionitwasfleeing.Whittakerandshine(1999)described455defen-
siveresponsesoffree-rangingeasternbrownsnakestoexperimentalcloseencounterswithhumans,butscoredonly12oftheseinwhichthesnakeadvancedtowardstheobserver.ofthese,onlythreeadvanceswerejudgedtobeoffensive.Intheirstudy,however,theydidnotreportattemptstoblockthepathofthesnakeonceitbegantoflee.ResearchershaveobservedthatmanyotherlargeAustralianelapidsreacttoanintruderbyrisingup,flatteningtheneck,openingthemouth,andcontinuinginthedirectionoftheintruder(Johnson1975,Greer1997). mymostinterestingencounterwithabluffingsnakehastobeanexam-pleofbehavioralmimicry.onemorninginJune2002,IwaswalkingalongthesparselyvegetatedfloodplainoftheescambiaRiverinwesternFloridawhen,suddenly,asnakeroseupcobra-likeandcrawledrapidlyuprightwhileIwalkedatasafedistancealongsideittakingphotosofwhatIassumedwasanotherCottonmouthengagedinaggressivebluffing.Itsbodyproportions,pattern,andbehaviorweresolikeaCottonmouththatIdidn’tdiscoveritstrueidentityuntilIlookedatmydigitalreadout.ItwasaperfectCottonmouthmimic,asouthernbandedWatersnake,Nerodia fasciata(Fig.5). Divertingmanyspeciesofsnakesfromthebeelinetrajectoryoftheirintendeddirectionisoftendifficult.thishasbeenparticularlyevidenttomeduringattemptstophotographmovingsnakes.manyseemfixatedontheoriginaldirectionoftheirmovementsothatonecannoteasilymakeasnakereverseitsheading.Dragthesnakebackwardsanditwillrepeatedlycrawlforwardalongitsprevioustrack. Ibelievethatthe“aggressivebluffing”behaviorIhavewitnessedintheCottonmouth,pigmyRattlesnake,Cornsnake,easternbrownsnake,andbandedWatersnakewereelicitedunderthespecialcircumstancesofencoun-teringthesnakesinhabitatsfamiliartothemandbyblockingtheirescapealongadirectiontheyhadchosen.Futurestudiesofaggressivebehaviorsexhib-itedduringblockedflightshouldtakethesea priori conditionsintoaccount. Iprobablydonothavetimeinmylifetotraveltheworldlookingforopportunitiestoblocktheescapepathofwildsnakes,butmaybebyreport-ingtheseobservations—aboutwhichIfeelsurehenryFitchwouldhaveenjoyedreading—willstimulateothernaturaliststowatchfor“bluffedaggressionduringblockedflight”insnakeseverywhere.Isuspectthatmostexperiencedfieldherpetologistshavehadsimilarencounterswithsnakes,andthelistofsnakespeciesthatdothismaybelong.Icannothelpbutwonderifshammedaggressionbehaviorsaremoreprevalentinvenomoussnakes,sincetheyaremorelikelytosurviveanattackbyenvenomatingtheintruderifthebluffdoesn’twork.maybesomeonewillconductin-depthstudiesandamorecompletereviewofthisinterestingbehavioralphenom-enoninsnakes,althoughIurgesnake-loversnottotrythesepotentiallydangerousexperiments,andprofessionalherpetologistswhomightdososhouldwearpropersnakebootsandothersnakebite-preventionapparel,unlikemeinFigures1and4.
Literature CitedAllen,e.R. andD.swindell. 1948.theCottonmouthmoccasinofFlorida.
Herpetologica4(supplement1):1–16.
Gibbons,J.W.andm.e.Dorcas.2002.DefensivebehaviorofCottonmouths(Agkistrodon piscivorus)towardhumans.Copeia2002:195–198.
Glaudas,X.andC.t.Winne.2007.Dowarningdisplayspredictstrikingbehav-iorinaviperidsnake,theCottonmouth(Agkistrodon piscivorus)?Canadian Journal of Zoology85:574–578.
Greer,A.e.1997.The Biology and Evolution of Australian Snakes.surreybeatty&sons,Chippingnorton,newsouthWales,Australia.
Johnson,C.R.1975.DefensivedisplaybehaviorinsomeAustralianandpapuan-newGuineanpygopodidlizards,boid,colubridandelapidsnakes.Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society56:265–282.
means,D.b.2008.Stalking the Plumed Serpent and Other Adventures in Herpetology.pineapplepress,sarasota,Florida.
Whitaker,p.b.andR.shine.1999.Responsesoffree-rangingbrownsnakes(Pseudonaja textilis,elapidae)toencounterswithhumans.Wildlife Research26:689–704.
Whitaker,p.b.,K.ellis,andR.shine.2000.thedefensivestrikeoftheeasternbrownsnake,Pseudonaja textilis(elapidae).Functional Ecology14:25–31.
Fig. 5.AsouthernbandedWatersnake(Nerodia fasciata)mimickingtheaggressiveflightbehavioroftheCottonmouth,sham-strikingforwardwithheadraised,bodyinflated,andjawswidened.
d. B
ru
ce
MeA
nS
Fig. 4.Aneasternbrownsnake(Pseudonaja textilis)comingstraightfortheauthorashebacksaway.
KA
tHy
Ste
inH
eiM
er
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 79nestInGsoFtshelltURtles
mostnestingfreshwaterturtlesminimizetheirtimespentterrestrially,leavingthewatertonestandreturningimmediatelyfollowingnest-
ing(burkeetal.1994).exceptionstothisincludesometurtlesthatmigratelongdistancestonest(e.g.,Emydoidea blandingi;Roweandmoll1991)andspeciesthatburythemselvesafternesting(e.g.,Kinosternon flavescensandK. subrubrum;Iverson1990,burkeetal.1994).putativereasonsforburrowinginKinosternonincludenestattendance/defenseandawaitingconditionsthatwouldreducestressorincreasesurvivalduringtheturtles’returntowater(Iverson1990,burkeetal.1994).
northAmericansoftshells(Apalonespp.;Fig.1)arewellknownfortheircharacteristicbehaviorofburrowingintosandandothersoftsub-stratesunderwater(Webb1962,GrahamandGraham1991);however,littleisknownregardingtheirpropensitytoburrowterrestriallyafternest-ing.Wehaveobservedshallowterrestrial“troughs”inassociationwithnest-ingcrawlsofA. muticaandA. spinifera onsandbarsthatresultfromfemalescrawlingjustunderneaththesurfaceofthesandandresurfacingsomedis-
Terrestrial burrowing in nesting softshell Turtles (Apalone mutica and A. spinifera)
michaelV.plummer1andJ.seanDoody2
1Departmentofbiology,hardingUniversity,searcy,Arkansas72143,UsA([email protected])2schoolofbotanyandZoology,AustraliannationalUniversity,AustralianCapitalterritory,0200,Australia([email protected])
photographsbytheseniorauthor.
Afternesting,femalesoftshellshavebeenobservedtoburrowforvariabledistancesunderthesandsurfaceincloseproximitytothejust-completednest.WedescribeterrestrialburrowingbehaviorinApalone muticaandA. spiniferafromKansas,Arkansas,andlouisianaanddiscusspossiblereasonsforthebehavior.
Fig. 1.maleApalone spinifera(top)andmaleA. mutica(bottom).
Fig. 2.softshellhabitatonsandbarsoftheKawRiverinKansas(top)andnestinghabitatalongtheWhiteRiverinArkansas(bottom).
80 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
tanceaway.WealsohaveobservedtheprocessoftroughexcavationinoneA. mutica. Collectively,wehaveobservedatotalof8troughsofA. muticaonsandbarsoftheKansasRiverinKansas(plummer1976,unpubl.data,7troughsofA. muticaontheWhiteRiverinArkansas(plummer,unpubl.data),and7troughsofA. spiniferaand4unidentifiedApalonetroughsontheComiteRiverinlouisiana(Doody1995).troughsvariedinlengthfrom0.5–4.0m(mean2.2±1.24msDinlouisiana)andabout20–30cminwidth.troughs(Fig.3)variedinshapefromstraighttocurvedtosinuoustofigure-eightshaped.onetroughthatappearedtobemadebyonefemaleA. muticaconsistedofthreeseparatesegmentsincloseproxim-ity,eachapproximately2–3minlength. mostnestingcrawlsofA. muticaandA. spiniferadidnotexhibittroughs(72of77;93.5%nestsofA. muticaand198of209;94.7%nestsofA. spinifera).however,5of8(63%)troughscontainednestsinKansasand11of15(73%)troughscontainednestsinlouisiana.troughswerefoundonlyduringthenestingseason(latemay–midJulyforbothspecies).exceptforbasking,thisperiodisgenerallytheonlytimethehighlyaquaticsoftshellsarefoundinterrestrialsituations(Webb1962).Wehavefoundbothpre-andpost-nestingadultfemales(Fig.4)burrowedtypicallyattheexitendofthetrough,butwehavenotfoundhatchlings,juveniles,adultmales,orsubadultfemalesintroughs.nestsmayoccuranywhereinthetrough,butusuallyweretowardoneend,mostoftenattheentrance(Fig.3b). Fewliteraturereferencesaddressnestingtroughsortheirfunction.harper(1926)notedthatnestingsoftshells(probablyA. ferox)sometimes
burrowedbeforereturningtowater.Apalonespp.generallynestonopensandbarsonsunnydays(Webb1962,plummer1976,Doody1995),whenextendedexposuretohightemperaturescouldpresumablybelethal.onehypothesisforthefunctionoftroughsisthatmothersburrowtotemporar-ilyescapehighsurfacetemperaturesandawaitoptimalconditionsforreturntowater.thisbehaviorissimilartothatofmudturtles(Kinosternon),whichnestlongdistancesfromtheiraquatichabitats(burkeetal.1994). Alternatively, burrowing turtlesmay exhibit cryptic behavior inresponsetodisturbanceorpredationrisk.Insupport,oneA. muticabur-rowedterrestriallyafterbeingdisturbedbymVpwhileshewasnesting.burrowingbyApalone is common inaquatic situations (GrahamandGraham1991).Forexample,whenapproachedfromsomedistance,indi-vidualturtleswillreadilyburythemselvesunderthesandinshallowwater(GrahamandGraham1991;JsD,pers.obs.;mVp,pers.obs.). Anotherpossiblefunctionisthatnestingturtlesburythemselvestomorecloselyassessthesuitabilityofsubstratecharacteristicssuchastem-perature.however,only5%of68A. spiniferanestsinonestudywereassociatedwiththebehavior(Doody1995).Finally,mothersmaysim-plyrespondtoaphysicalconstraint.extendedhotweatherconditionsorcoarse-grainedsandmayrendersurfacesandnotcohesive,causingthesandtocaveinonitselfwhenaturtleattemptstoexcavateachamber(Doodyetal.2004;Fig.5)orwhenhatchlingstrytoemergefromthenestchamber(mortimer1990;Fig.6).Asaconsequence,thecloselyrelatedpig-nosedturtle(Carettochelys insculpta)maynestatlowerelevationsonsandbarsduetothefriablesandathigherelevations(Doodyetal.2004);however,lowerelevationsincreasetheriskoffloodmortality.byburrowing,softshell
plUmmeRAnDDooDY
Fig. 3.(A)Acurvedtrough(dashedoutline)ofApalone spiniferaontheComiteRiverinlouisiana.(b)Astraighttrough(dashedoutline)ofA. muticaontheWhiteRiverinArkansas.theresearcherisprobingtofindtheexactlocationofthenest.
Fig. 4.Femalesoftshells,suchasthisApalone spiniferafromGinCreek,Arkansas,canbequitelarge.
A
B
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 81nestInGsoFtshelltURtles
motherscouldexcavateanestincohesivesandbyremovingtheuppermostloosesand.thisputativebehaviorisperhapsasimplerversionofbody-pittingdisplayedbyseaturtlesandtheAmazonianGiantRiverturtle,Podocnemis expansa(schaubleetal.2006,Vogt2008).body-pittingmayaidturtlesattemptingtonestonsandbarsthathavealayerofloose,drysand.Insupportofthishypothesis,Apalonenestsassociatedwithtroughsweredeeperthanthosewithouttroughs(Doody1995). Althoughwehavegeneratedhypothesesfortheunusual“troughing”behaviorexhibitedbysoftshells,currentevidencedoesnotallowustofavoranyparticularone.Focalobservationsofnestingturtleswouldbeparticu-larlyusefulbutdifficultgiventherelativelylowfrequencyofthebehavior.Accordingly,thethermoregulationhypothesiswouldbedifficulttotest.however,theothertwohypothesesmaybemoreeasilytestable.First,mockpredatorsorsomeotherdisturbancecouldbeintroducedtonestingturtlestotestthepredationriskhypothesis.second,thecohesivesandhypothesiscouldbeaddressedbyattemptingtoexcavateanartificialnestchambernexttothetrough.Failuretocreateachamberwouldlendsupporttothisidea(Doodyetal.2004).
AcknowledgmentsAfter informinghenryFitchabout theunusualbehaviorofanestingfemaleApalone muticathatmVphadobservedontheKansasRiverduringthe1973nestingseason,henrysaid,“Yououghttolookintothat.”Wellhenry,hereitis—thanksforthesuggestion.
Literature Citedburke, V.J., J.W. Gibbons, and J.l. Green. 1994. prolonged nesting forays
byCommonmudturtles (Kinosternon subrubrum).American Midland Naturalist131:190–195.
Doody,J.s.1995.Acomparativenestingstudyoftwosyntopicspeciesofsoftshellturtles(Apalone muticaandApalone spinifera)insouthcentrallouisiana.Unpublishedm.s.thesis,southeasternlouisianaUniversity,hammond.
Doody,J.s.,A.Georges,andJ.e.Young.2004.Determinantsofreproductivesuccessandoffspringsexinaturtlewithenvironmentalsexdetermination.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society80:1–16.
Graham,t.e.andA.A.Graham.1991.Trionyx spiniferus spiniferus(easternspinysoftshell).buryingbehavior.Herpetological Review22:56–57.
harper,F.1926.talesoftheokefinokee.American Speech1:407–420.
Iverson,J.b.1990.nestingandparentalcareintheturtle,Kinosternon flavescens.Canadian Journal of Zoology68:230–233.
mortimer,J.A.1990.theinfluenceofbeachsandcharacteristicsonthenest-ingbehaviorandclutchsurvivalofGreenturtles(Chelonia mydas).Copeia1990:802–817.
plummer,m.V.1976.someaspectsofnestingsuccessintheturtle,Trionyx muti-cus.Herpetologica32:353–359.
Rowe,J.W.ande.o.moll.1991.Aradiotelemetricstudyofactivityandmove-mentsoftheblanding’sturtle(Emydoidea blandingi)innortheasternIllinois.Journal of Herpetology25:178–185.
schauble,C.,R.Kennett,ands.Winderlich.2006.Flatbackturtle (Natator depressus)nestingatFieldIsland,Kakadunationalpark,northernterritory,Australia,1990–2001.Chelonian Conservation and Biology5:188–194.
Vogt,R.2008.Amazon Turtles.Graficabiblos,lima,peru.
Webb,R.G.1962.northAmericanrecentsoft-shelledturtles(Familytrionychidae).University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History13:429–611.
Fig 5.AfemaleApalone muticaexcavatinganestalongtheWhiteRiver,Arkansas.
Fig. 6.hatchlingApalone mutica readytoemergefromanest(thetop5cmofsandhasbeenbrushedback)alongtheComiteRiver,louisiana.
82 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
apparent competition by Grass frogs (Rana temporaria) and common Toads
(Bufo bufo) for breeding sitesIvanVergner
Zbysov33,CZ-28565ZbysovvCechach,CzechRepublic([email protected])
photographsbytheauthor.
theGrassFrog(Rana temporaria;Fig.1)iswidespreadthroughoutmostofeurope,rangingfromnorthernspaintotheUrals(absentfrom
southernandcentralIberia,muchofsouthernItaly,andtheCaucasus)andeasttowesternsiberiaandnorthernKazakhstanthroughnorthernGreeceandbulgaria.thespecieshasapatchydistributioninmountainouspartsofthebalkans.Ithasbeenrecordedfromsealeveltoelevationsapproaching2,700mabovesealevel(asl)inthepyrenees. theCommontoad(Bufo bufo;Fig.2) iswidespread ineurope(excluding Irelandandmostmediterranean islands, althoughpresentonsicily)andnortherneurasia,withpopulations inpartsofwestern
Asia(turkey,syrianArabRepublic,andlebanon)andnorthernAfrica(morocco,Algeria,andtunisia).Ineurope,thespeciesispresentinmostareas(includingtheUnitedKingdomandscandinavia),rangingasfareastasnorthernKazakhstanandeasternsiberia.Inthemiddleeast,itisfoundthroughmuchofturkey,northwesternsyrianArabRepublic,andhasrecentlybeenrecordedfromtwomountainouslocationsinlebanon.InAfrica,ithasaveryfragmentedrangeinthemoremountainousregions.thespecieshasanaltitudinalrangeofsealevelto3,000masl;however,innorthernportionsoftherangethespeciesoccursonlyatlowerelevations. IobservedreproductiveactivityofGrassFrogsataforestpondonthesoutheasternedgeofthemiddlebohemianRegionatanaltitudeof~410masl(49°48’n,15°21’e;Fig.3).oncequitecommonintheregion,populationsofthesefrogshaverecentlybeendeclining,withextendeddryperiodsthroughthespringandsummerofrecentyearsplayingamajorrole.Droughtconditionsleavefrogbroodswithalowprobabilityofsurvivinguntilmetamorphosis. Reproductiveactivityforlocalamphibiansbeginswithspringwarm-ingtrends.on3April2009,largenumbersofmaleCommontoads(Bufo bufo)appearedatthepond,andIobservedegg-layingandfertilizationdur-ingthefollowingtwodays.thefirstvocalizingmaleGrassFrogsbegantocongregateon6April.ovipositingbeganthateveningandcontinuedthroughthefollowingday(Fig.4). onthemorningof7April,agroupofabout15maleGrassFrogswereinterspersedwitharowdycollectionofabout10Commontoads.malesofbothspecieswereactivelyvocalizing.Askirmishensuedamongthemalesofbothspecies,leavingindividualtoadsandfrogslimpingandinjured.onebat-tlebetweentwoGrassFrogsandoneCommontoad(Fig.5)wasparticularlyheated,asthesemalesapparentlycompetedforprimecallingandmatingsites.
VeRGneR
Fig. 2.AnadultfemaleCommontoad(Bufo bufo).
Fig. 3.thebohemianforestpondwherefrogsandtoadsapparentlycompetedforcallingandmatingsites.
Fig. 1.AnadultmaleGrassFrog(Rana temporaria)approachingthebreedingpond.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 83GRAssFRoGsAnDCommontoADs
Fig. 4.CongregatingGrassFrogsandeggmasses.
Fig. 5.AheatedconflictbetweentwomaleGrassFrogsandonemaleCommontoad.Clutchesoffrogeggsarevisibleinthewater.
84 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 boWeRmAn
submerged calling by oregon spotted frogs (Rana pretiosa) Remote from breeding aggregations
Jaybowerman
sunrivernatureCenter,p.o.box3533,sunriver,oregon97707([email protected])
Frogcalls,largelyassociatedwithreproduction(i.e.,advertisementandreleasecalls),havebeenthesubjectofmuchinterestandstudy(schiötz
1973,Rosenandlemon1974,Wells1977,Fellers1979,Duellmanandtrueb1986,Kelley2004).Althoughwemostlyhearfrogcallsandcho-rusescomingfromthesurfacesofponds,anumberofspeciescallwhilesubmerged.Xenopusandotherpipids,allhighlyaquaticfrogs,callwhilesubmerged(elepfandt1996,Christensen-Dalsgaardandelepfandt2004).platz(1993)describedanewspeciesofleopardfrog(Rana subaquavocalis;butseeGoldbergetal.2004)thatexclusivelyemitsmatingcallswhilesub-mergedthatareinaudibleatthesurface.RanidsfromthewesternUnitedstates,taxonomicallydistinctfromtheirkinintheeasternU.s.(CnAh,2009),haverelativelyweakcallsthatdonotcarryfarfrombreedingloca-tions.severalofthesewesternranidscallbothatthesurfaceandwhilesub-mergedwheninornearbreedingaggregations(storm1960,licht1969,briggs1986,mactagueandnorthern1993). theoregonspottedFrog(Rana pretiosa)isahighlyaquaticexplosivebreederthatoverwintersundericeinmuchofitsextantrangeandspawnssoonaftericeleavestheponds(hayes1994).eggsaredepositedincom-munalaggregationsofafewtosometimesmorethanahundredeggmasses.Inthesunriverareaincentraloregon(elevation1,320m),breedingbeginssometimebetweenearlymarchandearlyApril,dependingonconditions.Althoughthebreedingseasonmaylastuptoamonth,breedingactivityatindividualovipositionsitestypicallyspansaperiodoftwotofivedays(pers.obs.).Duringbreedingevents,malesgatheratovipositionsites,call-ingactivelyatthesurfacewithbreedingtakingplacemostlyduringtheday. Recordedadvertisement callsofR. pretiosa consistof a stringoflow“clucks”orknocks,emittedatarateof3–7/sec,withpeakintensitybetween600–900hz.Releasecalls,emittedbybothmalesandfemales,weremoreofasingleordouble“squawk”givenatarateof1–2squawks/secandwithafrequencyspectrumsimilartoadvertisementcalls.Releasecalls
canbeelicitedalmostanytimebypickingupafrogwiththethumbandindexfingersplaceddirectlybehindtheforelimbs.RecordingsofR. pretiosa advertisementandreleasecallsatthesunrivernatureCenterareavailableatwww.sunrivernaturecenter.org. here,IreportforthefirsttimethatR. pretiosaalsocallsactivelyfromsubmergedlocationstenstohundredsofmetersawayfromandseveraldayspriortotheformationofbreedingaggregations.
Methods sub-surface listening was conducted using a DolphineAR™hydrophone(modelDe100-6-112),witha6-mcableandpreamporDolphineARpRohydrophoneconnecteddirectly toaZoomh-4digitalrecorder.listeningwasconductedbycastingthehydrophonefromshoretothelengthofthe6-mcable,allowingitsosink,listeningfor1min,retrievingapproximately1m,andlisteningagain.Recordingsweretakenwhengoodqualitycallingsignalsweredetected. twositeswereutilizedforsubmergedcallingsurveys.bullfrogpond(bFp,43°51’01”nx121°26’50”W)isa0.3-haisolated(nohydrologicAdultoregonspottedFrog(Rana pretiosa).
luK
e G
All
ow
Ay
sonogramofthemaleadvertisementcallofRana pretiosa.
sonogramofthereleasecallofRana pretiosa.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 85oReGonspotteDFRoGs
connectionstonearbywaterbodies),excavatedpond,somewhatirregularinshape,approximately100mlong,and10–25mwide.maximumdepthis2.5–3m.springrunoffraisesthewaterlevelasmuchas1m,creatingashallowarmthatextendsupto150mfromoneendofthepermanentportionofthepond.breedingtakesplaceinthedistalportionofthistem-poraryarm.themaximumdistancefromanypointwithinthepermanentpondtotheovipositionsiteisapproximately200m.egg-masscountsoverthepast10yearsrangedfrom21–200+(median24).markandrecapturestudiessuggestonlylimitedmigrationintooroutofbFp(unpubl.pers.obs.).ovipositiongenerallytakesplaceover1–3days. lakeAspen(lA,43°53’10”nx121°26’47”W)isa2.5-haexcavatedpondwithyear-roundconnectionstootherwaterbodies,includingtheDeschutesRiver.Waterlevelsarecontrolledbyweirsandfluctuatebynomorethan30cm.Along-termmarkandrecapturestudy(unpubl.data)hasdocumentedthatseveralhundredadultR. pretiosamovetolAinthefalltooverwinter,enteringviaashallowoutletchannel.InmarchandApril,frogsmigrateoutoflAtospawnatacommunalovipositionsiteknownasDuckpondmarsh(Dp,43°53’28”nx121°26’52”W)approximately1kmaway.AtDp,eggmassesaredepositedinseveralcollectiveclustersoveranareaofapproximately10x80m.spawningatDpspans2–4weeks,usuallyinburstsof2–5daysatanyonecollectiveaggregation(unpubl.pers.obs.).DuetothelargersizeoflA,noattemptwasmadetosystematicallysurveytheentireshoreline.Instead,thehydrophonewasdeployedatlocations
alongabout200mofshorelineoneithersideoftheoutletchannelusedbyfrogstomovetotheovipositionsite.
ResultsbFpwasice-coveredduringsurveyson14march2002,exceptforopenwaterataseepatthesouthend.by21march,thespringthawhadpro-vidednumerousopeningsaroundtheedgesofthepond,although5–8cmoficeremainedovermuchofthepond.theonlysoundsdetectedbyhydrophoneon14and21marchwerebubblesescapingfromtheice.Atapproximately1100hon28march,advertisementcallsofmaleR. pretiosaweredetectedatadepthofapproximately0.5mneartheedgeofapatchofCattails(Typhussp.)withinthepermanentpond.threemalesappearedtobecallingatthatlocation.Additionalsmallgroupsofcallingmalesweresubsequentlydetectedatfouradditionallocationsscatteredaroundtheperimeterofthepond.Ifounddetectablecallsonlyinanarrowzone2–3mfromshoreatdepthsof0.5–1m.movingthehydrophonemorethan2–3mawayfromacallingindividualwassufficienttolosethecallbecauseofsoundattenuation.nofrogcallswereaudibleatthesurface,andallfrogsappearedtobeconcealedinsubmergedgrassorsedgeonthebottom.theweatheron28marchwascool(~12°C)withaheavyovercast.Isawonefrogatthesurfaceofthepondduring2hofsurveying,amaturefemalethatremainedatthesurfaceforapproximately5minafterdetection,thensubmergedandwasnotseenagain. on30march,ahighpressureweathersystemarrived,bringingwarmsunnyweather.on31march,abreedingaggregationofmalesformedatthehistoricbreedinglocationandbreedingcommenced.Atotalof21eggmassesweredepositedoverthecourseofapproximately24–36h,withbreedingcompletedsometimeon1April.eighteeneggmasseswereclus-teredtogether,withthreesatellitemassesdeposited<3mfromthemainaggregation.thedistancefromthebreedingsitetothevarioussubmergedcallinglocationswas80–150m.Duringoviposition,10–20maleswereobservedcallingfromthesurfaceinthevicinityoftheeggmasses.Callingwasaudibleupto30maway.somemalesalsowereobservedcallingfromthebottomin10–15cmofwater,andtheircallswereaudiblebutmuffled.nocallingwasdetectedawayfromthebreedingsiteon30march. hydrophonelisteningatbFpin2003and2005failedtodetectanysubmergedcallingpriortoorremotefromtheformationofasurfaceaggre-gationandsubsequentoviposition.At1000hon15march2004,asinglemalewasdetectedcallingfromasubmergedposition~10mfromtheeven-tualovipositionsite.by1330h,severalmaleshademergedattheoviposi-tionsiteandwerecallingintermittently.thatevening,from2030–2130h,allsurfaceactivityattheovipositionsitehadceased,butanumberofmaleswerecallingactivelyattheafternooncallinglocationandattwoadditionallocationsinthepermanentportionofthepondapproximately80mfrom
Authorholdingpre-ampandcableofaDolphineARhydrophoneontheshoreoflakeAspen.
ro
B B
inG
HA
M
Communalovipositionsiteshowing~18newlylaideggmassesadjacenttoandon12eggmasseslaidseveraldaysearlier.Greenalgaearedevelopingwithinoldereggmasses.
jAy
Bo
wer
MA
n
schematicofbullfrogpondshowing2002and2006locationsofsubmergedcallingandsubsequentbreeding.
86 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 boWeRmAn
theovipositionsite.thefollowingday,alldetectableactivityhadshiftedtotheovipositionsiteandbreedingcommenced. In2006,iceremainedonthepondsuntillatemarchandwaterstoodatrecordhighlevels.on3April2006,Idetectedseveralmalescallingfroma20-mzoneinthemiddlesectionofthetemporaryarmofthepond.thiscallingzonewas20–40mfromtheovipositionsiteusedinprioryears,and40–60mfromthesitethatwouldbeusedin2006.Afterdark,at2100h,severaldozenmalesweredetectedcallingatdepthsof30–60cmwithinthissamenarrowband,about20mlong.multiplecallingmalescreatedacontinuouschorus.Atthistime,nosurfaceactivitywasdetectable.From1000–1130hon4April,Idetectedsubmergedcallingatthissamelocation,butnomorethantwoorthreefrogswereheard.nocallingwasdetectedfromwithinthepermanentpond.by1400h,afewmaleshadsur-facedandwerecallingnearthehistoricovipositionsite.on5April,surfaceactivityhadshiftedabout20mfartherupthetemporaryarmandspawningcommenced.overthenextthreedays,46eggmassesweredepositedinonemajorclusterandfivesatellitemasses2–5maway. lakeAspen,averydifferentsite,yieldedsomewhatdifferentresults.At1130hon4April2002,onefrogwasdetectedcallingabout4moff-shorenearthepondoutletatadepthofabout1.5–2.0m.Callingwassporadic,withpausesoftenlastingseveralminutes.Asecondindividualwasdetectedatasimilardepthabout30mtothewest.nofurthercallingwasdetectedthatyearandnosubmergedcallingwasdetectedduringseveraldaytimesurveysin2006.At1300hon28march2007,individualmalesweredetectedattwoofsixlocationswherethehydrophonewasdeployed.At2100hthatevening,however,1–3malescouldbeheardatfourofsixlisteninglocations.At1100hthefollowingday,asinglefrogwasdetectedcallingatoneofthelocations.thesecallinglocationsareapproximately1kmfromthemainovipositionsite.
DiscussionAdvertisementcallsofmaleRana pretiosa, ahighlyaquatic frog,weredetectedcomingfromsubmergedlocationsseparatedfromovipositionsitesbytenstohundredsofmetersandsometimesprecedingtheformationofbreedingaggregationsbyseveraldays.submergedcallingactivitywascon-siderablygreaterafterdark,eventhoughmostbreedingactivityoccursdur-ingtheday.oncebreedingaggregationsformedatovipositionlocations,malesweredetectedonlyinthevicinityofthebreedingaggregation,withcallingrestrictedtothesurfaceoratdepthsshallowenoughforthecallstobeaudibleabovewater. platz(1993)suggestedfourpossibleselectiveadvantages forsub-merged calling: Avoiding predators, avoiding temperature extremes,extendingthebreedingand/ordevelopmentalseason,andincreasingsound
transmissionrange.Incentraloregon,theprincipalpredatorsonR. pre-tiosaincludeGartersnakes(Thamnophis sirtalis),Greatblueherons(Ardea herodias),mink(Neovison [=Mustella]vison),andRaccoons(Procyon lotor).mostofthesepredatorsarevisual,daytimehunters.Callingwhilesub-merged,especiallyatnightandatdepthsgreaterthan30cm,wouldhelpR. pretiosaavoidthesepredators,exceptforraccoons. IncentraloregonandindeedthroughoutmuchoftherangeofR. pretiosa, temperaturesonclearnightsduringthebreedingseasonfallrap-idlyaftersunset,andovernighttemperaturesfrom-10–-5°Carecommon,althoughwatertemperaturesafewcentimetersbelowthesurfacetypicallyremainat8–14°C.submergedcallingwouldthusavoidthecoldtempera-turesatthesurface.IncreasingthelarvaldevelopmentalperiodisprobablynotimportantforR. pretiosa atsunriver,wheremetamorphosisisnormallycompletedinlateJulyorAugust,butmightbeimportantatsomehighele-vationssiteswheresnowandicecandramaticallyshortentheactiveseason.Despitethedensityofwater,submergedcallingdoesnotappeartoincreasesoundtransmissionrangeatthedepthsandintheenvironmentusedbyR. pretiosa.ladichandbass(2003)statedthat“…inshallowwaters,soundpropagationisverymuchlimited….”Indeed,Ifoundsubmergedcallingwasoftenundetectableatdistancesgreaterthan1–3mfromthesourcewhenthefrogswerehiddeninsubmergedvegetation. manyifnotallofthespeciesofRanafoundinthewesternUnitedstatesapparentlycallbothatthesurfaceandwhilesubmergednearbreed-ingaggregations(storm1960,licht1969,briggs1986).thisappearstobethefirstreportofsubmergedcallingbyanyofthesespeciesthatissepa-ratedfrombreedingaggregationsbothspatiallyandtemporally.AnecdotalreportsplaceamplecticpairsofR. pretiosa atvaryingdistancesfrombreed-ingsites.however,whetherremotepairingissimplyopportunisticasfrogsmovetowardbreedingsitesorifactivemateselectionmaybetakingplaceremotelyfrombreedingsitesandrelatedtosubmergedcallingisunclear.severalimportantquestionsremaintobeanswered.Isactivemateselec-tiontakingplacepriortoarrivalatbreedingaggregations?Ifso,thenwhatisthefunctionoflargeaggregationsofunpairedmalesfoundcallingatthesurfaceatovipositionsites?Conversely,ifmateselectionisprincipallyaccomplishedinthebreedingaggregationsatovipositionsites,thenwhatfunctiondoessubmergedcallingserve?Doesthepresenceofbothsurfaceandsubmergedcallinginseveralspeciesofwesternranidssuggestthatthiscladeisevolutionarilyintransitionfromonestrategytowardtheotherorthatcompetingselectivepressureshelpmaintaindualstrategies?Dootherwesternspeciesthatemitadvertisementcallsbothatthesurfaceandsub-merged(i.e.,R. cascadae,R. boylii,andR. luteiventris)engageinsubmergedcallingpriortoandatsomedistancefromtheformationofbreedingaggre-gations?Answeringthesequestionswillprovideabetterunderstandingoftheecologyofthisentiregroupofanurans.
Literature Citedbriggs,J.l.1987.breedingbiologyoftheCascadeFrog,Rana cascadae,withcom-
parisonstoR. aurora andR. pretiosa.Copeia1987:241–245.
Christensen-Dalsgaard,J.andA.elepfandt.2004.biophysicsofunderwaterhear-ingintheClawedFrog,Xenopus laevis. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology176:317–324.
CnAh(Center fornorthAmericanherpetology).2009.standardCommonandCurrentscientificnames(Frogsandtoads).www.cnah.org/nameslist.asp?id=3.
Duellman,W.e.andl.trueb.1986.Biology of Amphibians.mcGraw-hill,newYork.
elepfandt,A.1996.UnderwateracousticsandhearingintheClawedFrog,Xenopus,pp.177–191.In:R.C.tinsleyandh.R.Kobel(eds.),The Biology of Xenopus.oxfordUniversitypress,newYork.
Fellers,G.m.1979.Aggression territoriality, andmatingbehaviour innorthAmericantreefrogs.Animal Behaviour27:107–119.
Goldberg,C.s.,K.J.Field,andm.J.sredl.2004.mitochondrialDnAsequencesdonotsupportspeciesstatusoftheRamseyCanyonleopardFrog(Rana subaquavocalis).Journal of Herpetology38:313–319.
CommonGartersnake(Thamnophis sirtalis)swallowingaspottedFrog(Rana pretiosa).
luK
e G
All
ow
Ay
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 87oReGonspotteDFRoGs
hayes,m.p.1994.thespottedFrog(Rana pretiosa)inWesternoregon.partI.technicalReport94-1-01.oregonDepartmentofFishandWildlife,salem.
Kelley,D.b.2004.Vocalcommunicationinfrogs.Current Opinion in Neurobiology14:751–757.
ladich,F.andA.h.bass.2003.Underwatersoundgenerationandacousticrecep-tioninfisheswithsomenotesonfrogs.In:s.p.Collinandn.J.marshall(eds.),Sensory Processing in Aquatic Environments.springer,newYork.
leonard,W.p.,l.hallock,andK.R.mcAllister.1997.Rana pretiosa (oregonspottedFrog).behaviorandreproduction.Herpetological Review28:28.
licht,l.e.1969.ComparativebreedingbehavioroftheRed-leggedFrog(Rana aurora aurora)andtheWesternspottedFrog(Rana pretiosa pretiosa)insouthwesternbritishColumbia.Canadian Journal of Zoology47:1287–1299.
mactague,l.andp.t.northern.1993.UnderwatervocalizationbytheFoothillYellow-leggedFrog(Rana boylii).Transactions of the Western Section of the Wildlife Society29:1–7.
platz,J.e.1993.Rana subaquavocalis,anewspeciesofleopardFrog(Rana pipienscomplex)fromsoutheasternArizona.Journal of Herpetology27:154–162.
Rosen,m.andR.e.lemon.1974.thevocalbehaviorofspringpeepers,Hyla crucifer.Copeia1974:940–950.
schiötz,A.1973.evolutionofanuranmatingcalls:ecologicalaspects,pp.311–319.In:J.l.Vial(ed.),Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans.Universityofmissouripress,Columbia.
storm,R.m.1960.notesonthebreedingbiologyoftheRed-leggedFrog(Rana aurora).Herpetologica16:251–259.
Wells,K.D.1977.thesocialbehaviorofanuranamphibians.Animal Behaviour25:666–693.
suburbandevelopmentinWoodway(asuburbofWaco),mclennanCounty,texashadbegunin1964,whenIstarteda46-yearprojectto
recordthearea’snaturalandunnaturalherpetofaunalhistory(Gehlbach2002).the80-hasavannawaspartofaranchtotallyerasedbysuburbiaduringthestudy,andabout20%ofadjacentwoodlandwaslost.oneearth-dammedstockpondwaskeptforfishing;theotherwasdemolishedbyfloods.habitatprotectionwasinadvertentlyaffectedbycitybuildingcodesthatsavedforestedravineswithsteepslopes,creeksandtheirterraces,
andbyaplanned-unitdevelopment’s6-haprivatenaturepreserveofcreek,forest,andwoodlandin1984. thisstudypresentsfeaturesofextirpation,survival,andgeneralabun-danceofeachspeciesofamphibianandreptileanddescribesherpetofaunalchangeduringthestudysite’ssuburbandevelopment.Ihopeitwillstimu-lateotherstudiesthatsupportconservationandeducationaluseofnaturepreservesinourever-growingU.s.cities.
suburbanization of a central Texas Herpetofauna
FrederickR.Gehlbach
Departmentofbiology,baylorUniversity,Waco,tX76798
photographsbytheauthor.Allweretakenatthestudysite.
Reptilesandamphibiansweresurveyedonthebalconesescarpmentincentraltexasastheareawastransformedintosuburbia.offourhabitats,oak-junipersavannawastotallydestroyedandaquarteroftheadjacentoak-juniperwoodlandwaseliminated,buttwocreeksandmostdeciduousriparianforestremained.extirpationof12of30species(40%)included55%ofnineamphibianspecies,50%oftwoturtles,33%ofsixlizards,and30%of13snakes.herpetofaunalrichnessdeclinedexponentiallyfrom1965to1990withincreasedhousebuilding,thenstabilizedthrough2005asbuildingslowedandstopped.speciessurvivalwasrelatedtouseofculturalandremainingnaturalhabitats,secretivebehavior,andhumaninterest.
AmatingpairofCope’sGraytreefrogs(Hyla chrysoscelis). strecker’sChorusFrog(Pseudacris streckeri).
88 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
MethodsFieldworkcoveredthe120-hastudysite(elevation165–196m)onthebalconesescarpment in allmonths in1964–2009.originalhabitatswerematureevergreenoak-junipersavanna,alivestockpasturewithtree“islands”(locallycalledmotts),twopermanentcreeks(eachwithastockpondina12-mdeepravinewithdeciduousriparianforest),anddeciduousoak-juniperwoodlandonlimestoneslopeswithrockoutcropsabovetheforestedravines.observationalandcatchandreleasesurveysinmarch–octoberincludeda3.3-kmtransect(graduallyreducedbyhousebuildingto1.2km)inallhabitats2–4times/week,20coveredpitfalltrapsarranged
randomlyin200m2ofprotectedriparianforestandcheckeddailyinApril–June1984–1989,anddailydead-on-road(DoR)recordson3–5kmofcitystreetsborderingnaturalhabitatsandamonghousesinthestudysiteand1kmbeyonditonallsides. speciesaregroupedasfollows:(1)extirpated(noevidenceforfiveconsecutiveyears),(2)uncommonsurviving(notedlessfrequentlythanweekly),or(3)commonsurviving(noteddailytoweekly).proportionalherpetofaunalchangeswereanalyzed,aswasthecumulativenumberofextirpatedspeciesperfive-yearperiodin1965–2005relativetotheconcur-rentrateofhousebuilding.
GehlbACh
Greatplainsnarrowmouthtoad(Gastrophryne olivacea). smallmouthsalamander(Ambystoma texanum).
texasspottedWhiptail(Aspidoscelis [Cnemidophorus] gularis gularis).
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 89
scientificnamesfollowCollinsandtaggart(2009)orsubsequentupdatesonthewebsiteoftheCenterfornorthAmericanherpetology(www.cnah.org);ifrecentlychanged,previousnamesareinbracketstoassistrecognition.
ResuLtsextirpated species:
Woodhouse’stoad(Anaxyrus[Bufo]woodhousii woodhousii).Uncommon;disappearedby1970withoutevidenceoflocalreproduction. Cope’sGraytreefrog(Hyla chrysoscelis).Uncommonmarch–Aprilbreederinastockpondandadjacentcreekpoolsinriparianforestuntilgamefishwerestockedinthepondandsomeescapedintothecreekin1980;thisfrogdisappearedin1982. strecker’sChorusFrog(Pseudacris streckeri).Commonnovember–Februarybreederinthesavanna’srainpoolsfurtherformedaslivestockwallowsinnaturaldepressionsuntileliminatedby1975. Greatplainsnarrowmouthtoad(Gastrophryne olivacea).UncommonbreederinsavannarainpoolsduringApril–Juneuntil1975,butdidnotdisappearuntil1979. smallmouthsalamander (Ambystoma texanum).Common in theriparianforest;bredduringoctober–Decemberrainsincreekpoolsandthestockpondthatbecameafishingpond.thesecond-mostfrequentDoRamphibian;goneby1982. ornateboxturtle (Terrapene ornata).only two records in thesavanna;noneafter1975. texashornedlizard (Phrynosoma cornutum).Common in thesavannauntil1975;subsequentlyuncommoninsuburbanvacantlots
until1978.Apronounceddeclinethroughoutcentralandeasterntexascoincidedwithinsecticidesprayingfromairplanesinthe1970stoeradi-catepopulationsofimportedFireAntsthatexpandedduringsuburban-ization. texasspottedWhiptail(Aspidoscelis [Cnemidophorus] gularis gularis).Commoninthesavannauntil1975andlateruncommoninvacantlotsamonghouses;goneby1986.
teXAsheRptoFAUnA
broad-bandedCopperhead(Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus).
texaspatchnosesnake(Salvadora grahamiae lineata).
AnadultYellowbellyRacer(Coluber constrictor flaviventris).
Groundsnake(Sonora semiannulata).
AjuvenileYellowbellyRacer(Coluber constrictor flaviventris).
90 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
texaspatchnosesnake(Salvadora grahamiae lineata).thisrarestofthe13originalsnakespecieswasfoundonlytwiceinoak-juniperwood-land;notseenafter1988. broad-banded Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix laticinctus).Uncommon in the two natural wooded habitats and occasionally inwoodedsuburbanyardsuntil1970.Awinterden5maboveacreekinalimestonecrevicehad19sunningadultsinoctober1967;thedenwasapparentlydestroyedbydynamiteandlaterbulldozedduringdevelopmentofplanned-unithousing;extirpatedby1971. linedsnake(Tropidoclonion lineatum).onlythreeindividualswerefoundundergroundsurfacecoverinthesavanna,allbefore1975,makingthisthesecondrarestsnakeintheoriginalherpetofauna. Groundsnake(Sonora semiannulata).Uncommon;1–2foundannu-allyundersurfacecoverinevergreenwoodlanduntil1983.bothplainbrown-coloredindividualsandsnakeswithblackheadsandneckspotsonadullorange-browngroundcolorwerepresent.
uncommon surviving speciessouthernleopardFrog(Lithobatessphenocephalus utricularius [Rana sphe-nocephala]).onceacommonbreederincreekpoolsinmarch–may,andstillcommonincreeksandpondsoutsidethestudysite.Graduallylessabundantinthestudyplot;notrecordedin2007–2009,henceextirpationispossible. northernCricketFrog (Acris crepitans). Inhabitscreek sidesandbreedsincreekpoolsinApril–may,but,liketheotheranurans,eggsandtadpolesarewasheddownstreambyfloodsenhancedbystreetdrainage.effectivereproductionseemsincreasinglylessinfrequentforthisandallofthesuburbancreekbreedersthatremaincommontoabundantelsewhereinlocalruralareas. three-toedboxturtle (Terrapene carolina triunguis).originallyuncommoninriparianforestandrareinevergreenwoodland.since1991,onlyonemarkedadultmalehasbeenfoundannually(butnotin2009),sothepresentstatusisunknown.Afewliberatedpetsfromoutsidetheregionwereknownbefore2000,butextirpationisnowquitepossible. YellowbellyRacer(Coluber constrictor flaviventris).moderatelyabun-dantintheoriginalsavannaandwoodland,butgraduallymoreuncommoninremainingwoodlandandwoodland-yardedges,whereithuntslizardssuchasnorthernGreenAnolesandtexasspinylizards.originally1–3DoRrecordsperyear,butonlyonesince2000,reflectingreducednum-bers. Flatheadsnake(Tantilla gracilis).thisfossorialspeciesissecretivebutpersistsinremainingforestandwoodland.equaltoRoughearthsnakes,Flatheadsnakesweretheleastfrequentcatchinpitfalltrapsandaretheonlysurvivingsnakenotyetfoundondevelopedproperty.thisisthethird
mostfrequentDoRsnake,mostoftenonroadsborderingorlessthan75mfromremainingnaturalhabitat. texasGartersnake(Thamnophis sirtalis annectens).Alwaysuncommon,althoughitpersistsinriparianforestnearcreeksandoccasionallyappearsinsuburbanyardsandgardensthatadjoinremainingnaturalhabitat. easternhognosesnake(Heterodon platirhinos).Anothersnakeorigi-nallyuncommonandraretoday.becauseofitsinitialaggressive,neck-flat-tening,defensivebehavior,itiscommonlythoughttobedangerousandissometimesconfusedwiththeCopperhead,hencesummarilykilled.Coastalplaintoadsareknownfood.A48-cm(totallength)adultwasactiveat16°CinearlyDecember.oneDoRwasrecordedin2007.
GehlbACh
Anadulteasternhognosesnake(Heterodon platirhinos)exhibitingadefensivedis-playagainstapredator.
Coastalplaintoad(Ollotisnebulifer [Bufo valliceps]).
mediterraneanGecko(Hemidactylus turcicus)onthebrickwallofahouse.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 91
Common surviving species:Coastalplaintoad(Ollotisnebulifer [Bufo valliceps]).themostabundantanuranandmostfrequentDoRinallyears,apparentlybecauseindividu-alscongregateonstreetstofeedoninsectsbelowstreetlights.layseggsincreekpoolsandbackyardpondsduringApril–Augustrains,thelongestbreedingseasonamonganurans.Itistheonlyamphibianthatutilizesarti-ficialpondsatsuburbanresidences.Whetheranindividualbreedsmorethanonceannuallyisunknown.suburbanitesdonotmindtoadsontheirproperty.
RioGrandleopardFrog(Lithobates [Rana]berlandieri).breedsincreekpoolsduringAugust–october.Increasinglylesscommon,although,asnotedforotheranurans,abundantinpondsoutsidethestudyarea.streetandyardwaterdrainsintocreeks,sofloodedeggsandtadpolesand/ordis-solvedtoxinsmaybedetrimentstocontinuedexistence. mediterraneanGecko(Hemidactylus turcicus).IntroducedtoWaco,texasintheearly1950s(b.brown,pers.comm.)andtothestudysiteby1982.livesonbrickandstonewallsandinsidehousesandotherbuildings;hatchlingsappearanytimeexceptDecember–February.Adultsareactive
teXAsheRptoFAUnA
northernGreenAnole(Anolis carolinensis carolinensis)onapottedporchplant.
texasspinylizard(Sceloporus olivaceus).
WesternRatsnakes(Scotophis obsoletus[Elaphe obsoleta])readilyclimbtrees.
92 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
throughouttheyearduringnightswithtemperaturesabove~15°C,butinwinteronlyifbrickshavebeensun-heated.oneDoR. texasspinylizard(Sceloporus olivaceus).Inopenforest,woodland,andwoodedsuburbanyardsonthegroundandrocksandintrees(seealsoblair1960).Rarelyclimbsherbaceousvegetation.Gardensandbackyardrefusepilesarenestsites,alsoforGreenAnoles,Groundskinks,WesternRatsnakes,andprobablyotherspecies.themostfrequentDoRlizard. northernGreenAnole(Anolis carolinensis carolinensis).Commonaroundhouses,lesssoinforestandwoodlandedges.livesinplantedherba-ceousvegetation,shrubs,andtreesingardens,andclimbspottedpatioandporchplantsandhousewalls.thisspeciesincreaseddramaticallyduringsuburbanization,benefitingfromhumaninterestandplantingsthatattractitsinsectfood.two–threebroodsperyearinJune–september.Adultsareactivethroughouttheyearinsunnyweatherattemperaturesabove~15°C.thethirdmostfrequentDoRlizard. Groundskink(Scincella lateralis [Lygosoma laterale]).onlyslightlylessabundantthantheGreenAnole,butrarelynoticedbysuburbanitesbecauseof itssecretiveterrestrialhabits inandundergroundcover inwoodedyardsandgardens,especiallyatforestandwoodlandedges;2–3broodsperyearinJuly–september(seealsoFitchandGreene1965).thisisthemostfrequentreptileinpitfalltraps,andtheonlyabundantspecieswithoutaDoRrecord. RoughGreensnake(Opheodrys aestivus).moderatelycommoninopenriparianforestandbrushyedgesalongcreeksandinyardsandgar-dens,whereitisunnoticedlyinglengthwiseonlowfoliagewhilesit-and-waitforagingforinsects.Itsgreencolorationandbehaviorhideitsoeffec-tivelythatIneverheardofonekilledbypeople.oneDoRrecord.
WesternRatsnake(Scotophis obsoletus[Elaphe obsoleta]).thislargestoflocalsnakes(to2mtotallength)iscommoninforestandwoodland,lesssoonwoodedsuburbanproperty.ItisthesnakeIammostfrequentlyaskedtoremove;forexample,a1.5-madultcoiledinsideacookingpotinakitchencabinet.Activeinmarch–november;eggshatchinAugust–september.hatchlingsandadultseatlizards,includingmediterraneanGeckosonbrick-walledhousestosecond-floorheights.Anestpredator
GehlbACh
RoughGreensnake(Opheodrys aestivus).
Rough earth snake (Virginia striatula) in pre-shedding condition (note the“cloudy”eye).
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 93
ofopenandcavity-nestingbirds,includingsmallowls(Gehlbach1994).FourthmostfrequentDoRsnake. texasblindsnake(Rena[Leptotyphlops]dulcis).Abundantinsub-urbia,mostlyduringApril–Juneunderflatgroundcoverobjectssuchaspathwaysteppingstones;alsodugupinflowerbeds,foundaliveinswim-mingpools,ongaragefloors,ineasternscreech-owlnests(Gehlbachandbaldridge1987)andFireAntmounds(baldridgeandWivagg1992).thesecondmostfrequentlyrecordedDoRsnake,andtiedwiththetexasbrownsnakeforsecondmostfrequentpitfallcatch. texasbrownsnake(Storeria dekayi texana).likeothersmallinver-tebrate-eatingsnakes,encounteredmostlyduringthespringundergroundcoverafterrains.liveslargelyinriparianforestbutalsoinsuburbanyards,althoughlesscommonlythanblindandRoughearthsnakes.Itisthesec-ondmostfrequentpitfallcatchandthirdmostabundantDoRsnake. Roughearthsnake(Virginia striatula).themostabundantsuburbansnakeandDoRreptileofanyspecies.lawnandgardenwateringmightpromoteitsearthwormfood,whilesmallsize,burrowingbehavior,browncoloration,anduseofground-surfacecovercontributetoitsexistenceinsuburbia.Activeinmarch–november.
Discussionsurvivalwasnilforspeciesthatdependedmostlyontheerasedsavanna.strecker’sChorusFrogs,Greatplainsnarrowmouthtoads,andornateboxturtlesdidnotsurvive,whiletexashornedlizardsandtexasspottedWhiptailsremainedonlytemporarilyonlargevacantgrassysuburbanlotsintheformersavannaarea.otheramphibiansbredindecliningnumbersincreekpoolsorwereextirpatedbystockedgamefish.however,onetoad,threelizards,andfoursnakesbegantolivepartlyinsuburbanyardsandgardens.mostpeopledidnotmindtoads,buttwoofthelizardsandallofthesnakessurvivedinsuburbanhabitatsbybeinginconspicuous. nativespeciesmostcommonlyencounteredinsuburbiawere, inorderoffrequency,northernGreenAnole,Coastalplaintoad,Roughearthsnake,texasspinylizard,Groundskink,texasblindsnake,andRoughGreensnake.theyandothersurvivorsbenefitedfromthestudysite’sheat-island(landsberg1981),whichaveraged1.5°Chigherthanacorrespondingruralvalueinmarch–october(Gehlbach1994),andsub-urb-forestedgehabitatthatsupplied40%morepotentialinsectpreythan12mawayintheforestinteriorinseptember–october(D.Quigley,pers.comm.). humanattitudeswerenegativetowardthelargestsnakesandcontrib-utedtotheextirpationofCopperheadsanddeclinesinYellowbellyRacersandeasternhognosesnakes.homeownerssometimesaskedmetoremove
largesnakes,butnotthoselessthan~15cmintotallength,whichmanybelievedwere“worms.”smallsize,browncolor,soilorground-litterhabi-tat,andgreencolorcombinedwithsit-and-waitforaginghidsomelizardsandsnakesinsuburbia.Conversely,thenorthernGreenAnole’sreddewlapdisplays,bodycolorchangescoordinatedwithperchcolor,andprominentuseofcultivatedplantsdrewhumaninterestandprotectionthatmighthaveenhancedtheobviousincreaseinthenumbersofthisspeciesinsuburbia. Creek-breedinganuranswerenegativelyaffectedbywaterrunofffromcitystreetsandprivateproperties.theseunnaturalsourcesprobablycon-tainpetroleumandpesticidetoxins,andstreetdrainsconcentraterainintoflashfloodsthatwasheggsandtadpolesoutofthecreeks.thus,southernleopard,RioGrandeleopard,andnorthernCricketfrogsdeclined—butnotCoastalplaintoads,perhapsbecausetheirbreedingseasonis1.7timeslongerthanthoseoftheotheranurans,andhencearemorelikelytoavoidfloods.Also,onlythistoadbredinandmighthavebenefitedfromartificialpondsinsuburbanyards. twelve(40%)ofthestudysite’s30originalspeciesofamphibiansandreptilesdisappearedduringsuburbanization.thisfractionissignificantlylessthanthe67%extirpationof21speciessurveyedbyminton(1968)inanoldersuburbofIndianapolis,Indiana(c2=7.2,p=0.007).Amphibianlosseswerecoincidentwithdegradedaquatichabitatsinbothsuburbsandproportionatelyhigherthanthoseofreptiles:75%versus61%ofspeciesinIndianaand55%versus38%intexaswithoutintra-orinter-sitediffer-ences(c2<0.23,p>0.63). therateofherpetofaunaldeclineinthistexasstudywas1–5spe-ciesperfive-yearperiodofexponentiallyincreasingsuburbangrowthdur-ing1965–1995.subsequently,noadditionalspecieswerelostassuburbangrowthbecameprogressivelyslowerthrough2005.Duringninefive-yearperiodsthrough2005,thechangingandthenstableherpetofaunawasstronglycorrelatedwiththecumulativenumberofcitybuildingpermitsforthestudysiteandsurrounding1-kmwidesuburbanarea(3°polynomialregression,r2=0.95,p=0.001).
AcknowledgementsColleagues,family,friends,andstudentsjoinedhunts;nancyGehlbachwaspresentmostfrequentlyandmadehelpfulcommentsonthemanu-script.DenaQuigleyprovidedinsectabundancedatafrommalaisetraps.henrys.Fitchparticipatedinatransectsurveyinthe1970s,andIamhon-oredtodedicatethisstudytohismemoryinrecognitionofhisfriendshipandexemplaryprofessionalcareerinherpetologyandecology.
Literature Citedbaldridge,R.s.andD.W.Wivagg.1992.predationonimportedfireantsbyblind
snakes.Texas Journal of Science44:250–252.
blair,W.F.1960.The Rusty Lizard: A Population Study.Universityoftexaspress,Austin,texas.
Collins,J.t.andt.W.taggart.2009.Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians.6thed.CenterFornorthAmericanherpetology,lawrence,Kansas.
Fitch,h.s.andh.W.Greene.1965.breedingcycleoftheGroundskink, Lygosoma laterale.University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History15:565–575.
Gehlbach,F.R.1994.The Eastern Screech Owl: Life History, Ecology, and Behavior in the Suburbs and Countryside(2nded.2008).texasA&mUniversitypress,Collegestation.
Gehlbach,F.R.2002.Messages from the Wild: An Almanac of Suburban Natural and Unnatural History.Universityoftexaspress,Austin.
Gehlbach,F.R.andR.s.baldridge.1987.liveblindsnakes(Leptotyphlops dulcis)ineasternscreechowl(Otus asio)nests:Anovelcommensalism.Oecologia71:560–563.
landsberg,h.e.1981.The Urban Heat Island.Academicpress,newYork.
minton,s.A.,Jr.1968.thefateofamphibiansandreptilesinasuburbanarea.Journal of Herpetology2:113–116.
teXAsheRptoFAUnA
texasblindsnake(Rena[Leptotyphlops]dulcis)emergingfromthesoil.
94 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 bARten
Red milk snake Taking large Prey late in the season
stephenl.barten
VernonhillsAnimalhospital,1260s.butterfieldRoad,mundelein,Illinois60060([email protected])
photographsbytheauthor.
Redmilksnakes(Lampropeltis triangulum syspila)aresecretiveandlittleisknownabouttheirbehaviorwhencomparedtomanyother
northAmericansnakes(ernstandernst2003).theyaredietarygeneral-istsandareknowntopreyonmammals,birds,lizards,snakes,reptilianeggs,amphibians,fish,earthworms,slugs,andinsects(seereviewinernstandernst2003). milksnakeshave relatively smallheadsandmouthsandnarrowbodies,andtheygenerallyappeartoprefersmall,narrowprey(FitchandFleet1970,ernstandernst2003).Lampropeltis t. syspila(totallength[tl]144–812mm)issmallerthanL. t. triangulum(tl175–1140mm;Williams1988)andpresumablyeatssmallerprey.AmongthemammalianpreyrecordedforL. triangulumarevoles(Clethrionomys gapperi, Microtus ochrogaster, M. pennsylvanicus, M. pinetorum;seereviewinernstandernst2003).Fitch(1999)reported36preyitemsfrom19L. t.syspila and8scats.nineofthepreyitemswereMicrotus ochrogaster;8ofthosewerespecificallyidentifiedasnestlingsandsizewasnotspecifiedfortheother. on28september2007at1433h,IinvestigatedarodentdistresscallinUnionCounty,Illinois.thecallcamefrombeneathleaflitterinawoodedareanexttoagravelroadbetweenlimestonebluffsandswamp.Isawaleafmoveandliftedit,revealinganadultL. t. syspilawiththreecoilsaroundanadultWoodlandVole(Microtuspinetorum).theheadofthevoleprotrudedfromthecoils,butthesnake’sheadwasnotvisible.At1436h,thesnakestartedsearchingfortheheadofthevoleand,at1439h,itgraspedtherostrumofthevoleandbeganswallowing.Fourpeoplequietlyobservedtheeventandtookflashphotographsasunobtrusivelyaspossible.thesnakeremainedintentonconsumingitsmealdespitethedisturbance. thesnakefinishedswallowingthevoleat1519h(40minswallow-ingtime)andbeforethepreyhadreachedthesnake’smidbody,itstartedcrawlingoutofsightintotheleaflitter.Duringtheevent,wenotedthatthesnakehadashriveled,blindlefteye.theweatherwassunnywithanambientairtemperatureofapproximately30°C. thesnakewasnotrestrainedinordertoallowittofinishitsmeal,andsothelengthandweightofthesnakeandthevolewerenotrecorded.thevolewasidentifiedusingfeaturesvisibleinthephotographs.Microtus pinetorumhasauniformreddish-blackdorsumandashorttail(18–24mm)relativetoitshindfeet(approximately16mm).thehabitat(leaflitterinoak,hickory,andmapleforests)alsowasconsistentwiththatusedbyM. pinetorum(hoffmeister2002). thisfeedingeventwasnotablylateintheyearforaL. t. syspilatobeconsumingprey.FitchandFleet(1970)recorded20naturalfooditemsforL. t.syspilainnortheasternKansas.AllwereconsumedinlateApril,may,orearlyJune,withtheexceptionofonePlestiodon fasciatusinasnakecapturedon25september1964.tomyknowledgethepres-entaccountisthefirstunambiguousreportofL. t. syspilaconsuminganadultM.pinetorum.
AcknowledgementsIthankmichaelDloogatchforreviewingthisnoteandAmysullivanforidentifyingthevole.
Literature Citedernst, C.h. and e.m. ernst 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada.
smithsonianInstitutionpress,Washington,D.C.
Fitch,h.s.1999.A Kansas Snake Community: Composition and Changes over 50 Years.KriegerpublishingCompany,malabar,Florida.
Fitch.h.s.andR.R.Fleet.1970.naturalhistoryofthemilksnake(Lampropeltis triangulum)innortheasternKansas.Herpetologica24:387–396.
hoffmeister, D.F. 2002. Mammals of Illinois. University of Illinois press,Champaign.
Williams,K.l.1988.Systematics and Natural History of the American Milk Snake,lampropeltistriangulum.2ndrevisededition.milwaukeepublicmuseum,milwaukee,Wisconsin.
AdultRedmilksnake(Lampropeltis triangulum syspila)constrictingandswallowingalargeWoodlandVole(Microtuspinetorum).
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 95WIlDKInGCobRA
observations on a Wild King cobra (Ophiophagus hannah), with emphasis
on foraging and DietDhirajbhaisare1,VipulRamanuj1,p.Gowrishankar1,m.Vittala1,mattGoode2,andRomWhitaker1
1AgumbeRainforestResearchstation,suralihalla,Agumbe,shimogaDistrict,Karnataka,India([email protected])2schoolofnaturalResources&environment,UniversityofArizona,tucson,Arizona85721([email protected])
since2005,wehaveconductedresearchonKingCobras(Ophiophagus hannah)intheforestsandplantationssurroundingAgumbeRainforestResearchstation(ARRs)locatedintheWesternGhatsofsouthernIndia.Inmarch2008,westartedaradiotelemetryproj-ectandtodatewehavetrackedfouradultKingCobras(threemales,onefemale)forvaryingperiods.AlthoughwehavedocumentedanumberofinterestingfacetsofKingCobrabiology,thisnoteisconfinedtoobservationsmadeonasinglemale(m2)fromJune–november2009.Duringthistime,weobservedm2capturingandconsuming26pitvipers(twohump-nosedpitVipers,Hypnale hynale,and24 malabarpitVipers,Trimeresurus malabaricus).Weprovidedetailsoftheseremarkableobservations,andbrieflydiscusstheminthecontextofourongoingeffortstounderstandandconservethesecharismaticserpents.
KingCobrasinsouthernIndiaaredistributedalongthelengthoftheWesternGhats(thechainofhillsjustinlandfromthewesterncoast-
lineofpeninsularIndia),fromthesouthernmosttip,calledKanyakumari(blackRockestate),northtoGoa(bondlaWildlifesanctuary).therange
ofKingCobrasinthispartofIndiacoincideswithareasofextremelyhighrainfallandcorrespondingwetdeciduous,riparian,andevergreenrainforest(smith1943).theKingCobraisuncommonthroughoutitsrange,andmostofitsoriginalhabitathasbeendestroyed.Inaddition,KingCobrasare
Radiotrackingintherainforestischallenging,withvegetation,hillocks,andevenheavyraininterferingwithsignals.
vip
ul
rA
MA
nu
j
m2,anadultmaleKingCobraof“average”size(3.21mtotallength)intheWesternGhatsofsouthernIndia.
p. G
ow
riS
HA
nK
Ar
96 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 bhAIsARe
m2,anadultmaleKingCobraof“average”size(3.21mtotallength)intheWesternGhatsofsouthernIndia.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 97WIlDKInGCobRA
proudsponsoroftheIRCFandthiscenterfold
98 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
typicallykilledonsightthroughoutmostoftheirrange.however,hinduslivinginthemalnadregionofKarnatakastate,includingourstudyarea,thevillagesandReserveForestsaroundAgumbe,actuallyworshipKingCobrasandthesnakesarerarelyharmed,eveniftheyenteraresidence.thistolerantattitudeforthelargestvenomoussnakeintheworldhasnotonlyfacilitatedourresearchandeducationalefforts,butalsohasprovideduswithover100opportunitiesto“rescue”KingCobrasfromhumanhabi-tations(shankar,inprep.). Asinferredbytheirscientificname,KingCobrasfeedprimarilyonsnakes,includingtheirownspecies(wehaveobservedintraspecificpreda-tioninbothcaptiveandwildindividuals).theonlyotherpreyreliablyreportedfromthewildweretwospeciesofmonitorlizards(Varanusspp.),theCommonIndianmonitor(V. bengalensis;smith1943)andtheWatermonitor(Varanus salvator;C.traeholt,pers.comm.).twoofus(RWandpGs)haveobservedKingCobrasoverthepastseveraldecades,andwehavefoundthatadultsnakes(meantotallength[tl]ofmales~300–400cm;females~225–275cmtl)intheWesternGhatspreymainlyontheubiq-uitousIndianRatsnake(Ptyas mucosa;meantl~175cm,maximumtl~350cm,meanmass~1,250g).AlthoughwecommonlyobserveIndianRatsnakesinopenandswampyareasofbothcultivatedandwildland,werarelyobservethemindeepforest.UnusuallylargemaleKingCobras(>400cmtl)areknowntopreyonIndianpythons(Python molurus);oneofus(RW)wasshownphotosofamaleKingCobrakillingandswallowingamedium-sizedpython(~210–240cmtl),anda366-cmindividualkilledandswal-loweda280-cmReticulatedpython(Python reticulatus,shebbeare1947). somespeculation(b.G.Fry,pers.comm.)suggeststhatKingCobrasmaybeimmunetothevenomofviperidsandelapids,andthattheymay
takespecial“precautions”whenfeedingonpreyspecieswithlongfangs.ZoosaroundtheworldthatexhibitKingCobraseitherconditionthemtoeatdeadrodentsthathavebeenpreparedwithodorsfromsnakesand/orfeedthemsnakesthathavediedonexhibit.thishasresultedinalonglistofvenomousandnon-venomoussnakes,someasexoticasAfricanGaboonVipers(Bitis gabonica),thathavebeenfedtocaptiveKingCobras(s.pfaff,pers.comm.).however,anunderstandingoftrophicecologybasedoncaptivefeedingrecordsislessthansatisfactory.KingCobrashavebeenobservedfeedingonbandedKraits(Bungarus fasciatus)inthewild(saravanakumar,pers.comm.),andhereinwedescribewhatappearstobeselectivehuntingofvenomouspitvipers.
MethodsWeobtainedallfeedingobservationsreportedherewhileradiotracking“m2,”amale(tl=321cm,mass=4,900g),intothecoelomiccavityofwhichweimplanteda25-gtemperature-sensitiveradiotransmitter(modelAI-2t,holohilltd.,ontario,Canada).Wereleasedthesnakeonedayafterthesurgeryon28march2009atitsexactpointofcapture(~1kmfromtheAgumbeRainforestResearchstation[ARRs]).overthenexttwodays,thesnakemoved2.3km,climbingdownasteepescarpmentthatrenderedradiotrackingimpossible.thesignalwasloston31march,butrecoveredtenweekslateron7Juneafterincredibleperseverancebythetrackingteam.thesnakehadmoved~6kmstraight-linedistancefromwhereitwaslost,andwehavetrackedhimeverydaysince10June. Weradiotrackedm2eachmorning,stayingwithhimthroughoutthedayuntilnightfall.ondayswhenthesnakedidnotmove(i.e.,20con-secutivedayswhenshedding),westillobtainedafixeveryhour.Ateachfix,werecordedasuiteofenvironmentalparameters(e.g.,ambientandbodytemperature,relativehumidity,cloudcover),Gpscoordinates,andhabitatvariables(e.g.,canopycover,dominantplantspecies,sheltertype).Ifthesnakewasmovingorvisiblewhenlocated,wemadeeveryefforttoobserveitsbehavior.Althoughourinitialprotocolwasnottogettooclosetothesnakeforfearofinfluencingnaturalbehaviororcausingittomoveorhide,wequicklylearnedthatm2didnotseemtobedisturbedbyobserverswithinafewmeters,aslongastrackersremainedfairlystill.theabilityto
bhAIsARe
m2strikesandcatchesanadultfemalemalabarpitViperatmidbody;theviperistryingtosinkitsfangsintothecobra.
dH
irA
j B
HA
iSA
re
mapofsouthernIndiashowingthelocationoftheWesternGhatsandtheAgumbeRainforestResearchstation.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 99
closelyapproachthesnakehasenabledustomakethedetailedobservationsreportedoninthispaper. ourdataindicatethatKingCobrasareprimarilydiurnal,although,onafewoccasions,wetrackedanimalsafterdarkandrecordedsomemove-ments,onceuntil2200h,butthatwasexceptional.m2almostalwaysfoundasheltersitewellbeforesunsetandsometimesasearlyas1400h.Dependingonweather,suchasrainfall,ambienttemperature,andavail-abilityofsunlight,m2typicallyemergedfromhisrestingplacearound0900h(range=0830–1200h).Wealwaysstayedwithintherangeoftheradiotransmittersignal,becauseevenshortmovementscouldresultinlos-ingthesignalinthedenserainforestenvironment.Inaddition,thisallowedustoinferchangesinbehaviorofthesnakebymonitoringvariationsinsignalintensityandrate.Whenfeasible,wekeptthesnakeundersporadicline-of-sightobservationusingbinoculars.Wetookdetailednotesdescrib-ingallmovementandbehaviorsobserved,includingwhatappearedtobeobviousforagingbehaviorasrevealedbyincreasedtongue-flickingandapparentscent-tracking,presumablyinresponsetopreyodors.
Results and DiscussionDuring2008,wetrackedourfirstadultmaleKingCobra(m1)formorethan100kmoveranine-monthperiodthroughawiderangeofland-scapes,muchofithuman-dominated(e.g.,arecanut[betelnut]planta-tions,ricefields,andcommunityforests).Unfortunately,wesubsequentlylosthim.however,thosedataandothersfromover100“rescued”snakessuggeststhatatleastsomeKingCobras“prefer”human-dominatedland-scapes.perhapsKingCobrasaredrawntoman-madefeaturesbecausetheyattractrodents,whichinturnprovideforanincreasedrelativeabundanceofIndianRatsnakes. Duringthefirsttwomonths,wetrackedm2throughamixofdenseintactforest,degradedcommunityforests,andrarelyplantations.however,attheonsetofthemonsooninJune,m2movedintodeepforestnotfarfromARRs,wherehehasremained,exceptforonebriefperiodof22dayswhenheretreatedintoatermitemoundnearfarmlandson20september,emergingnewlyshedon12october.between7Juneand22november,m2moved35.6kmthroughanarea(whichwearetentativelyreferringtoashis“homerange”)totaling6.3km2. Wenaivelyassumedthatm2wouldnotbeveryactiveduringthemonsoon,becauseannualrainfall inAgumbeaveragesover7,000mmandhaspeakedatover11,000mmduringthefour-monthmonsoonsea-soninJune–september.Weassumedthatheavyandpersistentrainfallwouldcausefeedingtotaperoffuntilthereturnofwarmer,dryerweather.however,m2wasfirstobservedfinding,killing,andeatingamalabarpit
Viper(Trimeresurus malabaricus)on6Julyattheheightoftherainyseason.overthefollowingfourandahalfmonths,weobservedm2eatingatotalof26pitvipers,twoofwhichwerediminutivehump-nosedpitVipers(Hypnale hynale). Whetherornotm2movedonanygivendayusuallydependedonwhetherornotitwasraining,rainfallintensity,andpresenceorabsenceofdirectsunlight.ondrier,sunnierdays,m2typicallybaskedfor15–45minbeforebeginningtohunt.Foragingactivityconsistedofapparentlypurposefulsearching,characterizedbyconstanttongue-flickingandactiveprobingofcrevices,burrows,treebuttresses,andvegetativedebris.Datafromdaysonwhichweobservedm2feedingononeormorepitvipers(n=23),hespentfrom37minto>7hperdayforaging(mean=3.5h/day). Whenm2apparentlydetectedanodortrailofapitviper,hisforagingactivitybecamevisiblymoreintense,sometimesinducing“headjerking,”followedbysustainedtongue-flickingalongthepresumedodortrailuptoaheightof20minthecanopy.onseveraloccasions,pitvipersseemedalarmedbythecloseapproachofm2,causingthemtofallorlaunchfromtheirperch(malabarpitVipersareprimarilyarboreal,pers.obs.).Acon-siderableamountoftimespentforagingbym2consistedofclimbinginlowerandmid-canopy.ofthe24malabarpitVipersconsumedbym2,17(70.8%)werefoundandcapturedintrees,shrubs,vines,ordeadbranches,andseven(29.2%)werefoundandcapturedontheground. ourobservationssuggestthatKingCobrasareabletodetectmove-mentfromrelativelylongrange,perhapsasfaras50–100m.WehaveobservedKingCobrasintentlywatchingusaswemovedthroughdenseforestthickets.WealsohaveobservedaKingCobrathatappearedtobewatchingaflockofheronsflyingoverhead.however,theirvisualacuitymaybepoor,astheydonotseemtoeasilyrecognizestationaryobjects,betheypreyanimalsorpotentialthreats(suchasourselves).India’sfor-estpitvipersaretypicallynocturnalambushpredators,remainingseden-tarybyday(pers.obs.).Indeed,wehaveobservedpitvipersintheexactsamelocationandevenpositionforasmanyassevendays.KingCobrasareunlikelytoseeamotionlesspitviper.Infact,weobservedm2directlypursueandsubduepitvipersthathehaddisturbed,causingthemtomove.Whenunsuccessfulatcapturingthepitviper,m2reliedonchemosensorysearchingtofollowtheodortrail.Weobservedm2losetheodortrail,suchaswhenthepitviperfellintoorcrossedoverwater,buthepersistedinhissearchuntilhepickedupthetrailagain.Remarkably,heevenseemedabletosuccessfullyfindandfollowodortrailsinheavyrain.Althoughpitviperswouldoftenremainmotionless,theywouldinvariablymovewhenm2gottooclose,therebycausinghimtostrikeimmediately. Inonestartlingtwo-hourepisoderecordedonvideo,weobservedtheKingCobralocatingalargegravidfemalemalabarpitViper,causingittofallfromitsperchabout15mabovethegroundandtrytoevadecapture.
WIlDKInGCobRA
RiparianhabitatattheAgumbeRainforestResearchstationinsouthernIndia.
vip
ul
rA
MA
nu
j
m2catchesahump-nosedpitViperatmidbodyandproceedstoswallowitalive,doubledover,inafewshortminutes.
vip
ul
rA
MA
nu
j
100 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 bhAIsARe
m2promptlydescendedandfollowedthepitviperodortrailthreetimesaroundandacrossalarge,swiftstreambeforefinallycatchingandkillingit.Althoughthepitviperwaseasilyvisibletous,m2passedclosetohispreyseveraltimes,apparentlysointentonpickingupolfactorycuesthathefailedtoseethesnake.Atonepoint,theodortrailwasstrongenoughtoinducem2tobiteastonetwice,providingfurtherevidenceofthepromi-nenceofolfactionovervisionundersomecircumstances. Wealsodocumentedinterestingpreyhandlingbehavior.In16oftheobservedpreycaptures,oncem2sawthepitviper,heapproachedtheheadend(malabarpitVipershaveanarrowneckandwide,triangularheadcharacteristicofviperids)andgraspedthesmallersnakeeitherjustbehindordirectlyonthehead.ourobservationsofKingCobrasfeedingonIndianRatsnakesindicatethattheyarenotparticularaboutwhichpartofthebodytheygrab,eventhoughretaliatorybitesfromIndianRatsnakes,includingontheheadoftheKingCobra,commonlyoccur.perhapsm2wastryingtoavoidbeingbittenbythepitvipers.Innineofthepreda-tioneventsweobserved,theKingCobrareceivedwhatappearedtobeapenetratingretaliatorybite.WhilethescalesofaKingCobraprobablypre-ventpenetration,apitviperpresumablycouldpiercetheinterstitialskinbetweenscales.Whenbittenbypitvipers,m2invariablydroppedhisprey,waitinganaverageof10minuntilthepitviperwasimmobilizedfrombeingenvenomated.AlthoughmalabarpitVipervenomhasrelativelylowtoxicity(Dhananjaya,pers.comm.),thebiteofthehump-nosedpitViperhascausedkidneyfailureandoccasionaldeathsinhumansinsrilanka(desilva1990). Weobservedm2capturingalarge,gravidfemalepitviper,graspingitatmidbody,onlytoreceivewhatappearedtobeapenetratingbiteonthesideofthehead.m2immediatelyreleasedthepitviperand,withheadand
neckerectuptoapproximately50cm,appearedtowatchtheenvenom-atedpreyclimbanearbybranchtoaheightofabout6m.m2remainedmotionlessinthispositionforthenexthalfhour,mouthpartlyopen,with-outtongueflickingorreactinginanyway.eventhepitviper,fallingdeadfromabranchafter20min,approximately1maway,andtheapproachofthetrackerwithinapproximately3mtocheckforswellingatthesiteofthebite(nonewasevident),didnotelicitaresponse.After30mininthisuprightposition,m2cameoutofhisapparent“trance”andimmediatelystartedsearchingforthepitviper,ignoringthedeadsnakeinfrontofhimandinsteadclimbing(allthewhilevigorouslytongueflicking)tothepointwherethesnakefell.hethenreturnedtothegroundtoeventuallyfindandswallowthedeadsnake. themaximumtimeforapitvipertobeconsumed,startingwiththepointatwhichitwasbittenandendingwhenitwasswallowed,was67minandtheminimumtimewas4min(mean=14min).In16predationevents,m2graspedthepreybytheheadorneckand,inafewcases,immediatelyswalloweditalive,completingthetaskwithinafewminutes.Inthecaseofasmallhump-nosedpitViper(meanadulttl~25cm,meanmass<40g),m2simplygraspedthesnakeatmidbodyandswalloweditwhileitwasdoubledover,withoutbotheringto“jaw-walk”towardsthehead.Fourpitvipersweregraspedatmidbody,threebythetail,andwefailedtoobservethreeothercaptures.elevenofthesnakeswerestillmovingorclearlyalivewhenswallowed,12wereimmobileandthreewefailedtoseeclearly. Weestimated12ofthepitviperstobe~60cmtl(thesewereprob-ablyallfemales,severalappearedgravid),fivewereapproximately45cmtl(averageadultmalesize),andsevenwereroughly30cmtl.Weobservedm2eatingtwopitvipersperdayonthreeseparatedays.thecobrafre-quentlydefecatedafteraswallowingepisode.
AdultfemalemalabarpitViper.
vip
ul
rA
MA
nu
j
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 101WIlDKInGCobRA
Duringthisstudy,m2spentapproximately50%ofhisactivehoursforaging/huntingforprey,inthiscasepitvipers.ononeoccasion,hespentoverfivehourscontinuouslyforagingbeforehelocatedapitvipertoeat.hewasnotobservedsearchingfor,pursuing,orcapturinganyotherspeciesofsnakeduringthistime,despitethepresenceofotherspeciessimilarinbodymasstosmallerpitvipers(seebelow).sincewefollowedm2everydaythroughouthisentirediurnalactivityperiod,wealmostcertainlyrecordedthevastmajorityofpredationeventsoverthefull140-dayperiod.Duringthattime,ourfieldteamwaswithm2forabout8hperdayforatotalof1,120h.Duringthistime,weobservedm2atotalof74.89hoursengagedinobviousforagingbehaviorthatledtoanactualpredationevent.onaver-age,m2consumedapitviperevery5.38days,andspentanaverageof2.88hforagingforeachofthe26pitvipershecaughtandconsumed. InJuly–november,m2primarilyrestrictedhisactivitytodeepfor-est.thisperiodoftimecoincidedwithheavyrainfallintheAgumbearea.Duringrainyperiods,werarelyobservesnakesspeciesthatareknowntobetypicalpreyofKingCobras(e.g.,IndianRatsnakes).Inaddition,wehaveobservedIndianRatsnakesfarmorefrequentlyinopenmead-owsandagriculturallands,presumablywithhighpreydensities,thanindenseforest.Incontrast,pitvipersareapparentlymoreactiveduringthemonsoonseason,asevidencedbyourincreasedobservations.othersnakespecies,whicharetypicallyvisibleduringtherainyseasoninthevicinityofAgumbe,arebeddome’sKeelback(Amphiesma beddomei),large-eyedbronzeback (Dendrelaphis grandoculis), and theCommonVinesnake(Ahaetulla nasuta);however,wedidnotobservem2eatinganyofthesespeciesduringthetimeinwhichheconsumedthe26pitvipers.Althoughpurespeculation,perhapsKingCobrasasaspecies(orm2asanindividual)
preferpitvipers,ortheodortrailofpitvipersissomehoweasiertofollowthanthoseofothersympatricspecies. Alsointerestingtoconsideriswhetherornotthepitvipersthatm2consumedcouldprovidehimwithenoughenergytomaintainhishealth.Whenwecapturedm2inearlymarch,heweighed4,900g,whichisanaveragemassforahealthy321-cmKingCobra.Ifm2consumedanaver-age-sizedadultIndianRatsnake(~175cmtl,~1,250g)hisbodymasstopreysizewouldbeapproximately4:1.AsmallsampleoftenmalabarpitViperscapturedinthevicinityofARRsyieldedanaveragetlof45cmandanaveragemassof35g.Althoughwewereunabletoobtainmassesonthepitvipersconsumedbym2,weestimatedtherangeoftheirmassestobe30–60g,whichcorrelatestoanaveragemassofapproximately50g.Usingthis50-gestimate,themassratioofpredatortopreyisroughly98:1.Ifweaddtogethertheaverageapproximatedweightsofall26pitvipersconsumed,thepredator-preymassratiois3.77:1,whichisapproximatelyequaltothatofasingleIndianRatsnake.oneobviousquestionarisingfromthisexerciseiswhetheratotalpitvipermassof1,300gissufficientnutritionforaveryactive5-kgKingCobraoveraperiodof18weeks,nottomentionapresumedincreaseinpredationriskwhilemoving. basedonourobservations,m2apparentlyexpendedagreatdealofenergysearching,climbing(observedalmosteveryday),andpersistentlyandrepeatedlyfollowingpitviperodortrailsforwhatseemedtobeamea-gerreward.however,m2didnotappeartohavelostasignificantamountofmass,nordidhisbodyconditionappeartosuffer.nevertheless,smallsnakessuchaspitvipers,withtheattendantneedforlargeenergyexpendi-turetofindthem,areunlikelytofulfillthenutritionalrequirementsofsuchalarge,activesnake.
therainforesthabitatoftheKingCobraatAgumbeinsouthernIndia.
vip
ul
rA
MA
nu
j
102 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
Whetherornotm2willalterhisforagingtacticsduringtheupcomingmatingseason,whenKingCobrasofbothsexesbecomemuchmoreactive(judgingfromthedramaticincreasein“rescue”callsreceivedduringtheperiodofJanuary–may),remainstobeseen.perhapsm2willmoveintohuman-dominatedlandscapes,suchasplantationsandcropfields,whererelativeabundanceofIndianRatsnakesisapparentlymuchhigher.
AcknowledgementsGerrymartin,nikWhitaker,Charliepainter,loriKing,Aniruddhabelsare,Gowrimallapur,brijeshRaj,sandeshKadur,samirWhitaker,p.prashanth,R.sharmila,srinidhiKashyap,citizensofAgumbeVillage,andanumberofvolunteersputindaysofhardworkbrainstormingandprovidedlogisticalsupport,helpinthefield,andveterinarywork.We
aregratefultotheKarnatakaForestDepartmentfortheircollaborationandenthusiasticinterestinthisproject.WearegratefultothenationalGeographicsociety,DisneyWorldwideConservationFund,mohamedbinZayedspeciesConservationFund,RiverbanksZooandGarden,andGladysporterZooforprovidingfinancialsupport.
Literature Citeddesilva,A.1990.Colour Guide to the Snakes of Sri Lanka.R&Apubl.,UnitedKingdom.
Dunn,R.D.andK.W.brady.2001.snakeinhibitorsofphospholipaseA2enzymes.Biochimica et Biophysica(55803):1–9.
shebbeare,e.o.1947.themalayanCobras.Malayan Nature Journal2(2):25–32.
smith,m.A.1943.Fauna of British India, Vol. III. Serpentes.taylorandFrancis,london.
bhAIsARe
Googleearth®imageshowingsitesatwhichm2wasrelocated.ARRs=AgumbeRainforestResearchstation.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 103tURtlesoFtoRtUGUeRo
CasaVerde, theweathered,palm-sheltered former fieldheadquar-tersoftheCaribbeanConservationCorporation’svenerableGreen
turtleresearchprogram,andnowitsmodernizedsuccessor,theJohnh.phippsbiologicalFieldstation,standsquarelybetweentwogreatbiologi-calworlds.totheforestretchestheCaribbeanseawithallitsteemingmarinelife.Itsedgehereistheblacksandbeachoftortuguero,namedforthesmallcoastalvillageadjacenttothestation,andthemostimportantseaturtlenestingsiteintheentirewesternCaribbean.totherearlietherichCostaRicanlowlandrainforestandacomplexnetworkoffreshwatercanals,rivers,andswampsthreadedthroughitsverdure. For thebiologist, few ifanyotherplacesonearthoffer somanyopportunities,thenatureofwhichdependssimplyuponthedoorfromwhichoneemerges.ArchieCarrandthelegionofbiologistsuponwhomthereputationoftortuguerohasbeenbuiltwentoutthefrontdoortothedarkbeachesandtheirdrovesofnestingGreensandleatherbacks.Instead,Igooutthebacktostudyanequallyfascinatingbutpoorlyknownassemblageofsmallerturtlesresidentintortuguero’sfreshwaterandforest
habitats.longignoredandovershadowedbythehuge,spectacularlyabun-dantseaturtles,thesenon-marinespecieshaveunobtrusivelygoneaboutthebusinessoflivingwithoutmuchattentionfrombiologists.however,recentinvestigationsthatIhaveconductedontheirecologyhaverevealedmuchofinterestinthesesmallpackages.theirnaturalhistory,uniqueandworthyofrecordforitsownsake,alsoprovidesinsightintotheoriginoftheneotropicalnon-marineturtlefaunaandtheevolutionarystrategiesthatallowitssurvival.oneofthefreshwaterspecieshasledmethroughaproverbialrevolvingdoor.Inspiteofmyoriginalintentionstostayinthejungle,ittookmebacktothebeachtoobserveacriticalphaseofitslifehistoryinthetortugueroecosystem. studyingtheturtlesoftortugueroisasingularexperienceinitself.Cruisingthegreen-walledstreamswhilefour-footiguanaslaunchthem-selvesfromoverhangingbranches,andparrots,toucans,andhowlermon-keysscold,gurgle,androaroverheadaddsadimensiontoturtletrappingthatcan’tbematchedinthetemperateZone.thepresenceofcaimans,bullsharks,andstingraysintherivers,andJaguars,fer-de-lances,androv-
The backdoor Turtles of TortugueroDonmoll
Departmentofbiology,missouristateUniversity,springfield,missouri65897([email protected])
photographsbytheauthor.
T R a v e l o G u e
Adultmalemeso-Americanslider(Trachemys venusta),withacarapacelengthofabout40cm,onthebeachattortuguero.
104 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 moll
ingherdsofWhite-lippedpeccariesintheforestalsocontributespicetotheambience. oureffortstodatehaveyieldeddataconcerningfiveofthesixspe-ciesinhabitingthetortugueroarea.therarenarrow-bridgedmudturtle(Kinosternon angustipons)occasionallyturnsupattortuguero,butwehavenotyetlocateditsapparentlyratherspecializedhabitat.theobservedspe-ciesrangeacrossthenichespectrumfromthealmosttotallyaquaticsouthAmericansnappingturtles(Chelydra acutirostris)andmeso-Americansliders(Trachemys venusta),whichemergefromwateronlyforegg-laying,occasionalmovementintootheraquatichabitatsand,inthelatter,forsun-bathingonemergentlogs,tothesemiaquaticWhite-lippedmudturtle(Kinosternon leucostomum)andblackRiverturtle(Rhinoclemmys funerea),whichspendsignificantamountsoftimebothinwaterandwanderingontheforestfloor,tothefullyterrestrialbrownWoodturtle(Rhinoclemmys annulata),whichenterswateronlytodrinkorsoakinforestpuddles. besidesthesemoretraditionaltaxonomicandhabitatapproachestoclassifyingtortuguero’sturtles,ecologicalinformationmayhelptocat-egorizethemaccordingtotheirrespectivebiogeographichistories.Whilealloftortuguero’sturtlesarecertainlytropicalintermsoftheircurrentgeography,theirsurvivalheredependsuponstrikinglydifferentadaptiveapproachestocopingwiththetropicalenvironment.thesevaryingstrate-giesprovidecluestotheirpast.Fromthisperspective,twooftortuguero’sturtlesseemoutofplaceindeed. Reproductivepatternsareespeciallydiagnosticinthisregard.thetwomudturtlesandtheblackRiverandbrownWoodturtleslayoneoronlyasmallclutchofsmall(mudturtles)torelativelyverylargeeggs(blackRiverandbrownWoodturtles)ontheforestfloor,eitherasynchronouslythroughouttheyearoroverextendedperiodsduringtherainyseason.theycharacteristicallymakelittleornoefforttoburytheeggsotherthanscrap-ingalittleleaflitteroverthembeforetheypermanentlyleavethescene.thisreproductivepatternhasbeenobservedinsmalltomedium-sizedrainforest-dwellingturtlesinboththenewandoldWorldtropicsandisconsideredtobeindicativeoflong-termtropicalresidency—perhapsanadaptiveresponsetothemyriadeggandhatchlingpredatorsthatroamtherainforestfloor.Unpredictabilityinlayingtimeandlocationdiscouragespredatorsfromgangingupontheturtles’reproductiveeffortastheycan,forexample,onthenearbyGreenseaturtlenestingbeach. Alltheseaturtles,andtheworld’stemperateZonefreshwaterandterrestrialspecies,practiceaverydifferentnestingstrategy.theseturtlestypicallylayoneormorelargeclutchesofrelativelysmalleggsincarefullyconstructedsubterraneanneststhataresealedaftereggdeposition.nestingtakesplacewithinadistinctseasonandnestsoftenareconcentratedinsuit-ableareasthatprovidebotheasyaccessfornestingfemalesandthepropermicro-environmentforthedevelopingembryos.Aspredatorsoftenhome
inonthesenestingareaswithgreatefficiency,thesespeciesaremorelikelytosurviveasaresultoftheirabilityto“swamp”predatorsthroughtheirhighannualfecundityandthe longreproductive lifeofadult females.thesnappingturtlesandslidersoftortugueroreproduceinthistypicaltemperateZonepattern. tortuguero’scrazy-quiltamalgamofspecieswithsuchdivergentnest-ingstrategiesisbestexplainedbytherelativelyrecentinvasionofthecloselyrelatedancestorsofthelattertwospeciesintotheneotropicsfromtemper-atenorthAmerica.WithclosureoftheCentralAmericanisthmusduringtheplioceneandthesubsequentclimaticturmoilofthepleistocene,thetimewasripeforfaunalexchangesbetweenthetwocontinents.Duringdrierperiodswhentheforestshrankandrainforestspecialistswereatadisadvantage,theopportunisticsnappingturtlesandslidersprobablycolo-nizedCentralandsouthAmerica.today,thesnappersrangeasfarsouthasecuadorandthesliders’rangeextendsintotemperateArgentina.Duringwetterperiods,asinthecurrentinterglacial,however,theseJohnny-come-lateliesareapparentlyatadistinctdisadvantageinthere-coalescentrain-forest,astheirdistributionsareextremelydisjunctthroughthisvastareaandtheirpresentpopulationsizesoftenarelowcomparedtothetemperatehabitatsinwhichtheyoftendominatetheturtlefauna.Characteristically,bothspeciesarerelativelyuncommonattortuguero.onefocusofmyworkwastodeterminehowthesespeciesliveattortuguero,which,withtheexceptionoftheareaaroundthevillage,isstillcharacterizedbyprimaryrainforestasdenseasthatanywhereintheneotropics. Currently,twotropicalspeciesinthegenusChelydraandasmanyasninemainlandlatinAmericanspeciesinthegenusTrachemysarerec-ognized—allverycloselyrelatedtotheirtemperateZoneancestors,theCommonsnappingturtle(Chelydra serpentina) andtheslider(Trachemys scripta),respectively. Althoughlittlecomparativeinformationwasavailableconcerningtheecologyofsnappingturtlesinothertropicallocations(i.e.,limitednaturalhistoryobservationsinChiapasbymiguelAlvarezdeltoroandinColombiabythelateFedericomedemareavailable),thecollectivedatafromseveralstudiesofslidersintropicalmexico,belize,Colombia,Venezuela,andespe-ciallypanamaindicatedaremarkablysimilarecologytothatofpopulationsintemperatenorthAmerica.observedecologicaldifferencesinthetrop-ics(e.g.,greatersize,annualeggproduction,longernestingseasons,etc.)weremoreamatterofdegree,largelyrelatedtogreateropportunitiesforforaging,growth,andreproductionintheyear-longwarmthratherthansubstantivechangein lifestyle.WhileI foundessentiallythesamepat-ternsattortuguero,theslidersherewereuniqueintwocharacteristicsthatwarrantedfurtherstudy.First,theyarehuge,evenbytropicalsliderstan-dards,withsomefemalesattainingcarapacelengthsof44cmandweightsupto10kg.second,circumstantialevidencehadaccumulatedthatslidersusedCaribbeanseabeachesfornesting—averyunslider-liketrait,and
Ahatchlingslideratanestingsiteincocoplumscrubalongthebeachattortuguero.
Aslidernestingtrackontortuguerobeach.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 105
knowninonlyahandfulofothernon-marineturtles.turtlebiologistpeterpritchardhadpreviouslyobservedthatnon-marineturtletracksobservedontortuguerobeacheswerealwaysthoseofadultsliderfemales(whicharemuchlargerthanmales)andthatthediscardedcarcassesofslidersthathadbeencollectedonbeachesforfoodbytortugueroresidentswerealsoadultfemales.theseobservationssuggestedthatbeachedsliderswerenotjustwaifswashedoutofthetortugueroestuaryduringfloodperiods.Inaddition,inJune1989,Jimspotila,tomYocky,andIweresearchingforleatherbacknestsalongtortuguerobeachwhenweencounteredasmallstrangetrackthatwefollowedtoasinglesliderhatchlingonthelowerbeachnearthesurfline.Webacktrackedittoitsprobablenestingsiteinthecocoplumscruboftheupperbeachberm.theseobservationsintriguedme,andIresolvedtostudytheecologyofsea-beachnestinganditsadaptivesignificanceforslidersinthetortugueroecosystem.Iwasparticularlyinterestedinwhy,ofallthesliderpopulationsacrossthevastrangeofthesespecies,sea-beachnestinghadevolvedonlyhere,andwhetherthehugesizecharacteristicoftortuguerofemaleswassomehowlinkedtothisphenomenon. peterpritchard,whohasthoughtaboutmostthings“turtle”atsometimeoranother,hadpreviouslysuggestedthatbeachnestingwasprobablyaresponsetotheneedforopennestingsites,alwaysinshortsupplyinvirginrainforest,andthatlargesizeprovidedphysiologicaladvantagesduringtheperiodofseatravelrequiredtoreachappropriatenestingsites.AstudyoftheecologyofpanamanianslidersbymybrotheredwardmollandJohnleglerinthe1960shadestablishedthatgolfcourses,plantations,andothermoreopensiteswereusedtotheexclusionofrainforestfornestingintheir
CanalZonestudyarea,sothisfirstideamadesense.Asallseaturtlesandthoseotherfreshwaterspeciesknowntoventureintothesea,suchastheAsianriverterrapinsandAsiaticGiantandnilesoftshells,areverylargeanimalsbyturtlestandards,theassociationoflargesizeandseaworthinessalsoheldmerit.mysabbaticalleavefromteachingresponsibilitiesduringaspringsemesterseveralyearsagoallowedmethefreedomtowalkthetortuguerobeachesfromJanuarythroughmarch,thepeakoftheslidernestingseason,toacquiremoreinformation. FringedbyCoconutpalmandseagrape,theblacksandbeachoftortugueroextendsunbroken for35kmfromthetortugueroCanalestuaryinthenorthtotheparisminaRiverestuaryinthesouth.Alwaysbeautiful,itneverthelesscanbeadifficultplacetowork.byday,itquicklybecamelethallyhot,withsandsurfacetemperaturesapproaching70°C.Uponreturningfromearlymorningsurveys,Iusuallyenteredthecoolgloomoftheadjacentforestforarespite—oftenentertainedbywing-snappingmatingdisplaysofWhite-collaredmanakinsandslowlyforagingtroopsofblackhowlermonkeysinthetreetops.onmoonlessnights,thebeachcouldbesoblackastoloseitsfeaturesaltogether,andIwasregularlyupendedbybeachlitterandbysteppingoffnewlywave-cutbenchesthatchangedpositionnightly—but,iftherewerehardships,theyweremorethanoffsetbythelureofdiscoveryandthebeautyofthewildtropicalbeach.onebrightmoonlitnight,forexample,Isatwatchinganesting
sliderinthecocoplumscrubwhileanearly-seasonleatherback,spangledwithphosphorescenceandmoonglow,hauledoutofthesurftonestjustthirtymetersdownthebeach.onanothernight,asIreturnedtoCasaVerdeafterreachingthesouthernterminusofmysurveyroute,InoticedJaguartracksparallelingmyownfootprintsformorethanthreekilome-ters.Itwasabiganimal,apparentlywatchingmecuriously(Iprefernottothinkhungrily)fromthedarknessasItrekkeddownthebeach.Withoutdoubt,experiencessuchasthesewerethe“adventuresofanaturalistonremoteCaribbeanshores”thatArchieCarrhadinmindwhenhewroteThe Windward Roadnearly50yearsearlier. Gradually,throughobservationandradiotelemetricmonitoringofslidersintherivers,inthesea,andonthebeach,acharacteristicallyclock-wise,albeitvariable,nestingpatternemerged.slidersgenerallymovednorthwithrivercurrentsintotheseaviathetortugueroestuaryorbycross-inganarrowstripoflandthatseparatedtheriverfromtheseanorthoftortugueroVillage.theythenmovedsouthinthelongshorecurrentjustbeyondthesurflineuntiltheyhauleduptonestinthecocoplumscruboftheupperbeachafewkilometerssouthofthevillageintortugueronationalpark.spentfemaleswouldusuallyreturntothesea,movingdown-coastforabriefperiodbeforeemergingagaintotrekoverlandacross
tURtlesoFtoRtUGUeRo
AnadultsouthAmericansnappingturtle(Chelydra acutirostris)attortuguero
eggsexcavatedfromasnappernestneartortuguero.
snapperhabitatneartortuguero.
106 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 moll
thepeninsulatothetortugueroCanal.onceinthecanal,theymovednorthagainwiththecurrenttosuitablefeedingandbaskingareas.thepat-ternconservedenergybyutilizingtheprevailingcanalandseacurrents,andgottheturtlestotheappropriatenestingsiteswithlittletimespentonland,animportantpointthatI’lladdressbelow.theupperbeachcocoplumscrubnesting sitesprovidedamoderate thermal environment for eggdevelopmentwellawayfromthehighesttides,aswellasprotectivecoverforthelayingfemaleandemerginghatchlings.sliders,likemostturtles,havetemperature-dependentsexdetermination,inwhichwarmernestsornestdepthsproducefemalesandcoolersitesmales.substrate-temperaturemonitoringindicatedthatopenbeachtemperaturesweretoohotandprob-ablylethaltodevelopingeggswhileforestsoilswererootstrewn,soggy,andprobablytoocoolforadequatefemaleproduction.thecocoplum,however,providedfewobstructions,properdrainage,andtherightther-malregimefortheproductionofbothsexes.thelatterprobablyresultsfromacombinationofsingle-sexandmixed-sexnestsscatteredthroughthecocoplumscrub.Duetotherelativeproximityofthesesuitablebeachnestingsitestofreshwaterhabitats,astraight-linedistanceofakilometerorlessofforestedpeninsulainbetween,thesliderscansurviveattortuguero.Withoutit,asisoftenthecaseinmoreinlandrainforests,theyprobablycannot,andarethereforeusuallyabsentfromtherainforestturtlefauna. thequestionremains,however,whythefemalesliderssimplydon’twalkacrossthepeninsulatodeposittheireggsonthebeach?slidersarefullycapableofwalkingakilometerormoretolayeggsormovingfrompond
topondintemperatehabitats.Whyisitbettertorisktraveloverasubstan-tiallylongerdistancebyseainaphysiologicallydifficultenvironmentwithaformidablesetofpredatorsinordertoreachthebeachnestsite?theanswermaybelinkedtoboththesizeofthetortugueroslidersandtothevulner-abilityoftheirrelativelysmalleggstoadiversearrayofterrestrialpredators.Ithinkslidersherehaveresortedtoseatraveltoavoidleadingterrestrialpredatorstotheirnestsites.thiscouldoccurifpredatorsfollowedafemalewanderingoverlandtothenestingsite(orherscenttrail)orback-trailedhertothesiteasshemoveddirectlytowardthecanalthroughtheforestafternesting.Fromthisperspective,boththelongseatravelphaseinreachingthenestsiteandthereturntotheseaafternestingforabriefperiodbeforedown-coastemergenceandoverlandmovementtothecanalmakesense.Ialsothinkthatgreatsizehasevolvedasaconsequenceofthesea-travelphase.Whileitmaywellconferosmoregulatoryadvantagesbyloweringthebody-surface-to-massratio,workbybillDunsonofpennsylvaniastateUniversityhasshownthatevensmallerturtleshavearelativelylowrateofsodiuminflux.Ithinkthelargesizeherehasevolvedprincipallytopro-videthesea-goingfemaleswithinsuranceagainstthepredationrisksthathavebeenincreasedbytheirrelativelylongnestingmigrationsanden-routeexposuretomarinepredators.theoccasionalmutilatedcarcassesofsliderfemalesI’veobservedwasheduponthebeachunderscoretherealityofthedangers.WhitGibbonshasadvancedthegeneralhypothesisthatlargesizewouldconferanadvantageinreducingpredatoryandenvironmentalriskstoturtlesthatmusttravelfromtherelativesafetyoftheiraquatichome
brownWoodturtlehabitatinsecondarygrowthneartortuguero.brownWoodturtles(Rhinoclemmys annulata)arefullyterrestrial.
White-lippedmudturtle(Kinosternon leucostomum)fromtortuguero. White-lippedmudturtlehabitatattortuguero.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 107
rangefornestingorotherreasons.Asidebenefitofdecreasedtravelriskswouldbethatmoretimecouldbeexpendedandmoredistancetraveledinseekingthemostoptimalnestingsitesavailable.Ifstrongselectionreducesterrestrialtraveltominimizeeggpredation,thentraveltimeintheseamustincreaseaccordingly.theevolutionofgigantismattortugueroisprobablyaresponsetothesefactors. Ifthebeachesprovidetherelativelyopensitesnecessaryforslidernest-ing,Iwonderedwhatsitesmightbeusedfornestingbyresidentsnappingturtles.mystudiesoftheirecologyattortugueroindicatednosubstantivechangesfromtheecologyoftemperatepopulations.theyweresurvivingattortuguerobylivingtheirusualgeneralistlifestylecharacterizedbyhabitatflexibilityandomnivory.ReproductivestudiesbyRonbrooksinontarioandJustinCongdoninmichiganindicatedthatnorthernsnappers,likesliders,requirerelativelyopennestingsites.Isuspectedthattheywouldneedsuchnestingsitesattortugueroaswell,butIneverencounteredany
ontheseabeachesduringmyslidersurveys.byaccident,however,Istum-bledacrossanestingsnapperearlyoneFebruarymorningonanabandonedmilpa,anareaclearedandplantedforoneormoreyears,thenabandonedandallowedtoreturntoforest.theseareasremainrelativelyunshadedforseveralseasonsandprovideakeyhabitatforthesurvivaloftortuguero’ssnappers.byfocusingmysearchintheseareasadjacenttocaños(smallstreams),Iwasabletodiscoverseveraladditionalsnappernestsoveranextendedperiodofthespringdryseason.thesewereessentiallyidenticalinformandeggcharacteristicstotemperatenests.Attortuguero,aloosesortofmutualismexistedbetweenhumansandsnapperswherethebigtortugaslagartos(“Alligatorturtles”)occasionallywerecaughtforfoodbylocalresidents,and,inturn,wereprovidedwithnestsitesviamilpaagri-culture.perhapssnappersurvivalinthemodernneotropicsisdependentuponsuchhumanactivitieselsewhereinrainforestedareasaswell.treefallsnearwaterwaysmayprovidesimilarnestingopportunitiesbylettingmoresunlightreachtheground,butIneverencounteredanynestingsnappersinnaturalforestopeningsattortuguero. Ithinkoftheslidersandsnappersoftheneotropicsasthe“beverlyhillbillies”oftheturtleworld—truemisfits,butgamelytryingtomakeagoof it inanalienculture.thecollectiveecologicalevidence fromtortugueroandelsewhereindicatesthattheyhavenotyetblendedintotherainforestcommunityduringtheirbriefresidencehere.theirgeneralizedecologyandneedfornon-forestednestingsitesclearlyevolvedtocopewithadifferentenvironmentfarfromtheircurrenthome.theotherturtlesherehavebecomehighlyadaptedforlifeintherainforest.Reproducingandregularlyforagingontheforestfloorandeven,asourresearchindicates,beinginvolvedinsymbioticseed-dispersingrelationshipswithmanylocalplants,thesespecieshavetrulybecomepartofthefabricoftherainforestecosystem.Incontrast,thenewcomershaveextendedtheircharacteristicflexibilitytotheextremetosurvivehereinspiteoftheall-encompassingforest.byusingsuchtricksasbeachandmilpanestingtheyhavemanagedtohangon,barely,bytheskinoftheirjaws,astheforesthasreclaimeditsformerdomainduringthesewettertimessincethelasticeage.Fromthisperspective,theslidersandthesnappersoftheneotropicsmaybeamongthefewspeciestobenefitfromthecontinueddestructionoftherainforest.
tURtlesoFtoRtUGUeRo
thetortugueroRiverprovidedsliderandblackRiverturtlehabitat.tortuguerobeach.
blackRiverturtles(Rhinoclemmys funerea)spendtimebothinwaterandwanderingontheforestfloor.
108 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 sosAetAl.
AJJAepstudentandahatchlingornateboxturtlewithradiotransmitterattached.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 109
Turtles in the Dust: effects of Hands-on scientific Training on a Group of behaviorally
at-risk students’ Knowledge and empathyJ.Alansosa1,oscarReyes2,andGadperry1
1DepartmentofnaturalResourcesmanagement,box42125,texastechUniversity,lubbock,texas79409,UsA2lubbockIsD,1909n.Akron,lubbock,texas79415,UsA
photographsbytheseniorauthor.
Abstract.—Wetaughtagroupofbehaviorallyat-riskstudentslessonsonbox-turtlebiologyandnaturalhistorybeforetranslocatinghatchlingornateboxturtles(Terrapene ornata ornata)toanatureareaadjacenttotheirschool.thestudentsthenassistedwithdatacollectionandultimatelyusedtelemetrytore-locatetheturtlesandindependentlycollectdata.eachstudentintheexperimentalgroupwasgivenaquestionnairepriortobeginningandagainaftercompletionoftheprogram,withquestionscoveringbox-turtlebiology,naturalhistory,andempathytowardanimals.studentsinacontrolgroupweregiventhesamequestionnaireatsimilartimes.studentsintheexperimentalgroupfelttheyimprovedtheirknowledgeconcerningbox-turtlebiologyandnaturalhistoryaftertraining,whereascontrolgroupstudentsdidnot.neithergroup,however,showedachangeinempathybetweenthepre-andpost-questionnaires.Incorporatingbehaviorallyat-riskstudentsinresearchprojectsmayenableresearcherstocompleteprojectswhileatthesametimeinvolvinganoften-neglectedportionofthepopulation.
Introduction
Interactionswithanimalsatayoungageimprovesocialdevelopmentandattitudestowardnatureinchildren(myersandsaunder2002).In
addition,companionanimalsintheclassroomareknowntoincreasesen-sitivitytowardhumansandpossiblydecreaseaggression(hergovichetal.2002).Gender,animalownership,andattitudestowardanimalsalsoaffectempathytowardhumans(taylorandsignal2005).however,noconsen-suslinksinteractionswithanimalsandincreasedempathytowardhumans(paul2000,taylorandsignal2005).Wealsoareunsurewhetherinvolvingstudentsinintensive,hands-onscienceprogramswithanimalsmightalsoincreaseempathytowardnature. thegoalsofthisstudyweretoincreasescientificknowledgeandfosterempathytowardanimalsinagroupofbehaviorallyat-riskstudentsbyengagingstudentsinahands-onresearchproject.Wepredictedthatasaresultofpersonalinvolvementinbox-turtleresearch,theexperimentalgroupofstudentswouldshowincreasedknowledgeandempathywhencomparedtoacontrolgroupthatreceivedneitherclassroomlessonsnoranopportunitytoparticipateinfieldresearch.
study systemtheJuvenileJusticeAlternativeeducationprogram(JJAep)isanalterna-tiveeducationprogramforstudentswhohavebeenexpelledfromanyoftheeightschooldistrictsinlubbockCounty,texas.theprogramfocusesondisciplineandattemptstobringstudents’knowledgeuptotheircur-rentgradelevel.moreinformationcanbefoundatwww.lubbockisd.org/JJAep/.A0.6-hanatureareaisadjacenttotheschoolandisbisectedbyanaturewalk. theornateboxturtle(Terrapene ornata ornata)rangesfromsouth-erntexastosouthDakotaandfromColoradotoIndiana.ItisthestatereptileofKansas(Dodd2001)andisoftenwell-likedwhereveritisfoundnearpeople.likemostmembersofthegenus,theornateboxturtlehasdeclinedthroughoutmuchofitsformerrange.however,urbanlubbockholdslargepopulationsthathavereceivedsomeattentioninrecentyears(sosa2009).
hAnDs-onsCIentIFICtRAInInG
hatchlingornateboxturtle(Terrapene ornata ornata).
110 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
MethodsWeworkedwith students enrolled in the JJAep fromApril 2008 tooctober2009.oneofus,theactingprincipalofJJAep(oR),selectedmalestudentsbetweentheagesof13and17whometminimumrequirements(goodattendanceandbehavior)toparticipateinthehands-onexperiment.beforetraining,theselectedstudentsweregivenashortquestionnairewithquestionsonbox-turtlebiology,naturalhistory,andattitudestowardsani-mals.Uponcompletionofthequestionnaire,oneofus(JAs)metwiththestudentstwiceweeklyfor45minuteseachtime.Duringtheinitialthreeweeks,welecturedthestudentsonbox-turtlebiologyandnaturalhistorywiththeassistanceofbooksandarticles.Wealsodemonstratedthepropertechniquesemployedbyscientistsinthestudyofboxturtles,suchasradiotelemetryandthreadtrailing,totheexperimentalgroupofstu-dents.beginningonthefourthweek,wetranslocatedhatchlingornateboxturtles,whichhadbeengiventothesouthplainsWildlifeRehabilitationCenter,tothenatureareaadjacenttotheJJAepcampus.twohatchlingsin2008andthreehatchlingsin2009weretranslocatedtothenaturearea.theexperimentalgroupofstudentsaidedintheattachmentofradiotrans-mittersandmeasurementsofeachturtlepriortotranslocation. Werelocatedeachhatchlingtwotofivetimesaweekfortheremain-deroftheactiveseason.thestudentsassistedwithrelocationsbiweeklyduringtheschoolyear.Foreachrelocation,werecordeddate,time,Gpscoordinates,weatherdata,habitat,andactivityoftheturtles.beforestu-dentsweredismissedforsummerbreak(approximatelysixweeksfollowingadministrationoftheinitialquestionnaire),eachstudentcompletedthequestionnaireagain.Acontrolgroupofstudentswasgiventhequestion-nairetwiceduring2009,withasix-weekinterval,butreceivednotrain-ing.thequestionnaireconsistedoffactualquestions,aswellassomeabout
individualattitudes.Forquestions1–11,whichfocusedonstudents’per-ceptionsoftheirknowledge(e.g.,“howmuchdoyouknowaboutboxturtles?”)answersrangedfrom1(“nothing”)to5(“everything”).Questions13–15offeredarangeofanswers(e.g.,forthequestion“thebestplaceforaboxturtleis?”answerswere“innature”;“inazoo”;“inacageasapet”;“thereisnogoodplace”;and“noneoftheabove”). Weusedananalysisofvariancetotestforchangesinknowledgebetweentheanswersonpre-andpost-questionnairesforthetwogroups(experimentalandcontrol).significantdifferencesbetweenpre-andpost-surveyswerethenexploredfurtherwithanindependentsamplest-testforeachgroup.Wetestedfordifferencesbetweenqualitativepre-andpost-sur-veyquestions(13–15)withachi-squareanalysis.Resultswereconsideredsignificantatα=0.05.
ResultsFivestudentsin2008andfivein2009beganintheexperimentalgroup.AttherecommendationoftheJJAepprincipal,however,twostudentsdidnotcompletetheentiretrainingprogramin2009.Inaddition,12studentsin2009werepartofthecontrolgroupandreceivednotraining.Aftertrain-ing,allstudentsintheexperimentalgrouphadseenaturtle,whereasnodif-ferenceinbox-turtlesightingsexistedbetweenpre-andpost-questionnairesforthecontrolgroup.Wefoundasignificantdifferencebetweencontrolandexperimentalgroupsforquestions1–9andquestion11(p<0.05),allofthembox-turtlespecific,butnotquestion10,whichinvolvedfactorsresponsibleforenvironmentaldegradation.Withintheexperimentalgroup,wefoundasignificantimprovementbetweenpre-andpost-responsesonquestions1–11(p<0.05inallcases).Incontrast,wedetectednoimprove-mentforthecontrolgroupforquestions1–11(p>0.05inallcases).no
sosAetAl.
JJAepstudentsandahatchlingornateboxturtles.
JJAepnaturetrailmarkerandrepresentativehabitat.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 111
statisticallysignificantdifferencesexistedbetweenthepre-andpost-answersforquestions13–15(p>0.05)foreithergroup.
Discussionourresultsindicatethatstudentsintheexperimentalgroupimprovedtheirknowledgeonbox-turtlebiologyandnaturalhistory.Questions13–15,however,wereanattempttodetermineiftrainingimpactedstudents’empa-thytowardboxturtles.theanswerchoicesmighthavebeenat theextremes,eitherapositiveornegativeresponsewithnoneutralchoices.Ifstudentshadamorediversearrayofanswerchoicesandweworkedwithalargersampleofstudents,webelievetheresolutionofwhetherstudents’empathychangedwouldimprovebecauseempathyisexpectedtoincreasewhendirectcontactwithanimalsisprovided(thompsonandGullone2003). At-riskstudentsarecapableofindependentlycollectingscientificdatawhengiventraining,despitethefactthatsomeprocedureswerecomplex(radio-telemetry)andothersrequiredmeticulousattentiontodetail(datarecording).theexperimentalgroupofstudentsisnowtrainedinadvancedscientificproceduresthatmosthighschoolstudentsdonothavetheoppor-tunitytolearn. Inconclusion,ourtrainingprogramwaseffectiveinteachingat-riskstudentsbiologyandnaturalhistoryofboxturtlesaswellasscientificskills.
Futurestudiesshouldfocusonframingquestionsonempathyinordertoimproveresolution.studiesalsoshouldexaminewhetherstudentswhopar-ticipateintraininghaveincreasedconfidencecomparedtostudentswhodonotreceivespecializedtraining.becauseJJAepisaschoolforstudentsexpelledfromtraditionalschools,theextraattentioncouldprovidestudentswithmoreconfidenceandincreasetheirmarketabilitylaterinlife.Ataminimum,studentswereexposedtonovelideasandapotentialcareerpath.
AcknowledgementsWe thank C. Klein for assistance in planning this experiment. theequipmentused in thisexperimentwaspartially fundedbythetexasherpetologicalsocietyandthetexasparksandWildlifeDepartment.thisexperimentwasconductedundertexastechUniversityIACUCprotocol#108021-05andIRbprotocol#501915.thisismanuscriptt-9-1187oftheCollegeofAgriculturalsciencesandnaturalResourcemanagement,texastechUniversity.
literature CitedDodd,C.K.,Jr.2001.North American Box Turtles: A Natural History.Universityof
oklahomapress,norman.
hergovich,A.,b.monshi,G.semmler,andV.Zieglmayer.2002.theeffectsofthepresenceofadogintheclassroom.Anthrozoös15:37–50.
myers,o.e.,Jr.andC.D.saunders.2002.Animalsaslinkstowarddevelopingcaringrelationshipswiththenaturalworld,pp.153–178.Inp.h.Kahnands.R.Kellert (eds.),Children and Nature: Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations.mItpress,Cambridge,massachusetts.
paul,e.s.2000.empathywithanimalsandhumans:Aretheylinked?Anthrozoös13:194–202.
sosa,J.A.2009.effectsofurbanizationonmovements,activity,andtranslocationsitefidelityofornateboxturtles(Terrapene ornata ornata)inthesouthernhighplainsoftexas.Unpublishedm.s.thesis,texastechUniversity,lubbock.
taylor,n.andt.D.signal.2005.empathyandattitudestoanimals.Anthrozoös18:18–27.
thompson,K.l.ande.Gullone.2003.promotionofempathyandprosocial-behaviourinchildrenthroughhumaneeducation.Australian Psychologist38:175–182.
hAnDs-onsCIentIFICtRAInInG
JJAepstudentsusingradio-telemetrytorelocatetranslocatedturtles.
Asked“Whatisyourknowledgeonhowbigaboxturtlecangrow?”experimental-groupstudentsshowedsignificantlygreaterimprovementafterworkingwithturtlesthandidcontrol-groupstudents.similarpatternswereseenonallnaturalhistoryquestions(questions1–11onthepre-andpost-surveys).
112 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 RIVAs
managementofhabitatsfortargetspecies,suchastheYellowAnaconda(Eunectes notaeus)inArgentina,canbebeneficialtomanyotherspecies,suchastheseneotropicalCormorants(Phalacrocorax brasilianus)atbanyadolaestrella.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 113
c o m m e n T a R Y
Is Wildlife management business or conservation — a Question of Ideology
JesúsA.Rivas
Departmentofevolution,ecology,andorganismalbiology,theohiostateUniversity,Columbus,ohio
photographsbytheauthor(exceptwherenoted).
Macroeconomics and Conservation Approaches
Ipublishedanarticlein2007aboutanacondaconservationandhowitcanbeaffectedbymacroeconomics(Rivas2007a).Iidentifiedpovertyas
theultimatethreattoconservationinlatinAmericaandhowconservationeffortswereboundtomeetwithlittlesuccessaslongaspovertyremainstheruleinruralareas.Ialsoidentifiedneoliberalpolicies1asoneofthemaincausesofpovertyandhighlightedhowwellintendedconservationefforts,basedonneoliberalmeasures,failtosolvethepovertyproblemsofruralregions—andthusalsofailintheirconservationgoals.Instead,theyworkasa“painkiller,”creatingtheillusionofasolution,providingatbesttempo-raryrelief,butinfactdistractingfromseekingrealsolutions.
What is true Conservation?AtthecoreofanydisagreementregardingconservationprogramsinlatinAmericaisthenotion,widelyheldamongmanyconservationbiologists,thatanyplanforwildlifemanagement,includingecotourism,isbydefini-tionaconservationplan.thisnotionhasbeenpromotedforthelastfewdecadesinordertocapitalizeonpeople’sincreasingenvironmentalaware-ness(e.g.,mansfied2009).however,considerableevidencesuggeststhatwildlifemanagementisnotde facto conservation.Considerabird-watchingoperationlocatedinanareainhabitedbyaveryshyandrarespecies.birdwatchersflocktothesiteduringthenestingseasontoseethisrarespe-cies,whichcanproduceaneconomicsurgeinthelocaleconomy.Althoughsuchanexamplemightbeconsideredaneffectiveconservationplan,ifthisrarebirdissoshythatthesteadyparadeoftouristscompromisesnestingsuccess,thispopulationcouldliterallybe“watched into extinction.”Atrueconservationprogrammusthaveconservationasitsprimarygoalandnotjustasabyproduct.Ifonlyabyproduct,thesystemcaneasilystrayintoaregularbusinessregulatedsolelybythebottomline—andonethatmightnotevenbesustainable. Wildlifeharvestingprogramsfall intooneofthreecategories:(1)businessesthatexploitanenvironmentalcommodityuntilitisdepleted.(2)businessesthatuseanenvironmentalresourceinasustainablemannerbutwithoutprovidingenougheconomicincentivestothestewardsoftheland.(3)programsthatusearesourcesustainablybutalsoprovidesubstan-tiveeconomicincentivesforlocalcitizenswhothenhavegoodreasonstoprotecttheenvironmentfromotherusesthatmightnotbesustainable.Whenthebulkoftheeconomicincentivebenefitsthelocalcommunities,theywillhavebothreasonsandresourcestopreventexternalenterprisesfromthreateningtheenvironment.Iwouldarguethatthefirstexampleisnotconservationatallandthatonlythethirdistrueconservation.thesecondexamplecan—andshould—takecreditforbeingsustainable,butjustbecauseitdoesnotdestroytheenvironmentisnotenoughtoconstrue
itasaconservationprogram.As a matter of ideology, the goal of a conservation program must be conservation.economicgaincanbeabyproductorameanstodoconservationbutitmustnotbethegoal.Also,themainbeneficiariesofatrueconservationprogrammustbethelocalcommunities.theyaretightlylinkedtothelandandwillmorelikelytrytoprotectanecosystemthatsupportsthem—iftheyhavetheresources.externalbusinessescaneasilymovetheiroperationelsewhereandarenottrulycommittedtothemaintenanceofthesystem.
Management of Anacondas in Formosa, ArgentinaInmy2007article(Rivas2007a),Ineverintendedtoprovideacompre-hensivereviewoftheArgentineanYellowAnacondamanagementprogramandIdonotintendtodosonow.myconcernthenandnowisthatman-agementprogramsthatallocatemostoftheprofittoaneconomiceliteprovideonlysuperficialrelieftotheproblemsofthelocalpeople,donotprotectthesystemagainstexternalinfluences,anddonotconstitutetrueconservation.Infact,theyhavethepotentialfordistractingusfromseekingrealsolutions. micucciandWaller(2007),andWallerandmicucci(2008)high-lightedanumberofpositiveelementsintheFormosaprogram.Inaddi-tion,theprogramhasdoubtlesslyincreasedtheeconomicstatusofthelocalpopulation.Frominterviewswithlocalpeople,Ilearnedthattheanacondaharvestcouldincreasetheiryearlyincomebyasmuchas50%.Ialsolearnedfromlawenforcementofficialsthattherateofcattlerobberyandcommoncrimeshaddroppedtohistoriclevelssincetheprogrambegan,whichtheyattributedtothelocalpeoplehavinglegalmeansofearninganincome.Whileallthesearedesirabletraitsinamanagementprogram,theydonot
CommentARY
1Inessence,neoliberalpoliciesseekstotransfermuchofthecontroloftheecon-omyfrompublictotheprivatesectorunderthebeliefthatitwillproduceamoreefficientgovernmentandimprovetheeconomichealthofthenation.
Formorethantwodecades,theVenezuelanspectacledCaiman(Caiman crocodilus)programgeneratedacontinuousprofitandwasoftencitedasanexampleofsustain-ablemanagementinafree-marketeconomy.however,thesystemcollapsedasaconsequenceofover-hunting,andtannersmovedtheiroperationstoothersites.
114 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 RIVAs
differfromanyotherbusinessmovingintoanareaandtheymightfailtoprotecttheecosystemagainstnon-sustainableuses—becausetheincentiveofferedbytheanacondaprogram,asdescribedinmicuccietal.(2006),isnotenoughtoempowerthelocalpeople,nordoesitprovidethemwiththemeanstoopposeacorporatetakeoverinsearchofgreaterprofits. Wildlifemanagementprogramsaroundtheworldarenotaskedtomeetthesehighstandardstoqualifyasconservation.Iwouldalsoarguethatthisisthereasonconservationprogramsmoreoftenthannotshowpoorresults.thisandmyearlier2007papersareintendedtoraiseaware-nessabouteconomicsandpoliticsamongconservationbiologists,todesignmanagementprogramsthatnotonlyuseresourcesinasustainablemannerwithconservationasabyproduct,buttodesignthemwithconservationastheprincipalgoalandtoincludeinthemmeansofprovidinglocalcommu-nitieswiththeresourcestowithstandpressuresfromexternalsourcesthatpromotenon-sustainableusesinfavorofshort-termprofits2. Weshouldnotusetheterm“conservation”forprogramswithgoalsthatarenotprimarilyconservation-oriented.Forexample,catchingfishtosupplyhigh-endrestaurantsiscalledfishing,notfishconservation.Fishingoperationsaroundtheworldarefirstandforemostcommercialbusinesses—andfishingoperationshaveonmanyoccasionsover-fishedtheirstocks(e.g.,hutchingsandmyers1994,larkin1977,myersetal.1997).Furthermore,evensustainablefishingoperationsdonottrytodisguisetheirbusinessasconservationprograms.theanacondamanagementprograminFormosamaywellbealegitimate,sustainablebusinessthathelpsthelocaleconomy(likeanybusiness)andrelievespressureonthenaturalenvironmentbyprovidingjobs(asbusinessesoftendo)—but,ifconservationismerelyabyproduct,suchaprogramshouldnotbepresentedasconservation.
Globalization or No Globalization? that is the QuestionConservationeffortsbasedonglobalizationandthefreemarketareriskybecausetheyarenottime-testedmodelsandfallwithinanarrowcontextofeconomicprinciples.Wecannottrustourpreciousdiversitytosuchuntestedeconomicmodels.Free-marketeconomieshave largely failedintheonetasktheypurportedlyaredesignedtodowell:productionofwealth.theUnitedstatesisoneofveryfewcountries(basicallytheG83)thathavebenefitedfromafreemarketsystem—butthatisnotthecaseforthemajorityofthecountriesthathavetriedit.Furthermore,thecountriesthathavesucceededunderfree-marketeconomiesarecountriesthathavedestroyedmostoftheirpristinenaturalhabitats,asafreemarketreliesonconstanteconomicgrowth.Usingglobalizationandfree-marketmeasuresforconservationpoliciesisaresponsetoideologicalagendas,anditisnotdata-drivenorsupportedbyfacts(e.g.,mansfield2009). Idonotintendtoturnthiscommentaryintoadebateoneconomicsorpolitics,butwhenweapplyaconservationstrategythatistightlylinkedtoaneconomicideologywearesupportingthatideology,whetherwereal-izeitornot.Insistingonfree-marketmeasuresforconservationdespitetheirrepeatedfailurestoprotectbiodiversityisnotonlyineffectivebutshowsadherence—consciousornot—toideologicalpositionsthatareintrinsicallyatoddswithconservationprinciples.
tylenol ConservationAsIarguedinmy2007articles,temporarymeasurescanandshouldbedevelopedtoaddressandrelieveshort-termproblems.todifferentiatethemfromrealsolutions,Ilabeledthem“tylenolConservation,”astheyworklikeapainkiller,amelioratingsymptomsofadiseasetheyarenotintendedtocure.Amanagementprogramthatrelieveslocalpovertywhilewesearchforrealsolutionsisawelcometoolaspartofaconservationprogram,butitisitnotconservationbyitself—anditshouldnotreplacethesearchforarealsolutionanymorethanapainkillershouldreplacethesearchforarealcure. manyoftheconservationsolutionsweseekintoday’sworldaredes-tinedtofailbecausetheyrelyonthesameneoliberalframeworkresponsibleforthepovertythatislargelyresponsibleforthefailureofconservationprograms,andtheyprovideonlytemporaryandsuperficialrelief.thisis
2Imaginethatacorporationwantedtodrainlargeportionsoftheswampfromwhichanacondasarebeingharvestedto,forexample,plantoilpalmsforthepro-ductionofagro-fuels.thisoperationwilldestroythehabitat,butwouldalsoofferpermanentemploymentwithcomparableorsuperiorincometowhatthelocalsmakefromwildlifeharvesting.Willthelocalsbewillingtoopposethisoperationtoprotectthehabitat?Willtheyhavetheresourcestoopposethecorporation?Icontendthatitisonlyconservationiftheanswertothesequestionsisyes.
IstartedtostudyGreenAnacondas(Eunectes murinus)inVenezuelain1992inordertoexplorethepossibilitiesforsustainableuse.Duetothecollapseofthecai-manprograminthemid-1990s,theVenezuelangovernmenthaltedotherharvest-ingprograms.Consequently,noattempttoharvestanacondasevermaterializedinVenezuela.Conservationbiologistsoftenbelievethattheirapproachtoconservationispure conservation,strictlyscientific,orsomehowdevoidofpoliticsorideology.however,managementprogramsbasedonafree-marketeconomyrelyonconstantgrowth,whichisintrinsicallyatoddswithconservationprinciples.scientistswhofailtorealizethisareatriskofbecomingunwittingtoolsofeconomicagendasthattheydonotunderstandorwithwhichtheymightnotevenagree.
ton
y c
ro
cc
etA
large, non-aquatic animals have been unable to flourish in most Capybara(Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris)habitats(hoogesteijnetal.1997).Infact,Capybaraare,forthemostpart,thelonelargeherbivoreinmostoftheirnaturalhabitats.Assuch,thenormallargepreypredatorhasnotevolved,andcapybaracanbefarmedinanalmostcompletelynaturalsetting.Consequently,manyconservationistshavestronglypushedforgovernmentallysubsidizedCapybarafarming.
3A forumfor theworld’smajor industrializeddemocracies (Canada,France,Germany,Italy,Japan,Russia,UnitedKingdom,Unitedstates)todiscussissuesofmutualorglobalconcern.
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 115WIlDlIFemAnAGement
whyIseektoredefinewhatwedoinconservationbypromotingagreaterawarenessofthepoliticalandeconomicframeworkinwhichwefunction.notdoingsocanrenderusunwittingtoolsofeconomicandpoliticalide-ologiesthatcompromisethesuccessofconservationefforts.
Referenceshoogesteijn,R.andC.A.Chapman.1997.largeranchesasconservationtoolsin
theVenezuelanllanos.Oryx31:274–284.
hutchings,J.A.andR.A.myers.1994.Whatcanbelearnedfromthecollapseofarenewableresource?AtlanticCod,Gadus morhua,ofnewfoundlandandlabrador.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences51:2126–2146.
larkin,p.A.1977.An epitaph for the conceptofmaximum sustainedyield.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society106:1–11.
micucci, p.A. and t. Waller. 2007. the management of Yellow Anacondas(Eunectes notaeus)inArgentina:Fromhistoricalmisusetoresourceapprecia-tion.Iguana14:161–172.
micucci,p.A.,t.Waller,ande.Alvarenga.2006.programaCuriyú,pp.77–92.In:m.l.bolkovicandD.Ramadori(eds.),Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Argentina. Programas de Uso Sustentable.buenosAires,Argentina.
mansfield,b.2008.Globalenvironmentalpolitics,pp.235–346.In:K.Cox,m.lowandJ.Robinson(eds.),Handbook of Political Geography.sage,london.
mansfield,b.2009.sustainability,pp.37–49.In:n.Castree,D.Demeritt,D.liverman,andb.Rhoads(eds.),A Companion to Environmental Geography.blackwellpublishingltd.,oxford.
myers,R.A.,J.A.hutchings,andn.J.barrowman.1997.Whydofishstockscol-lapse?theexampleofcodinAtlanticCanada.Ecological Applications7:91–106.
Rivas,J.A.2007a.Conservationofanacondas:howtylenolconservationandmacro-economicsthreatenthesurvivaloftheworld’slargestsnake.Iguana14:74–85.
Rivas,J.A.2007b.Whatiswrongwithpainkillers,npR,theDemocraticparty,andconservationbiologists.The Axis of Logic(http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_25333.shtml).
Waller,t.andp.A.micucci.2008.Anacondaconservation:AreplytoRivas.Iguana15:51–53.
notonetoquestionitsluck,thisGreategret(Ardea alba)readilyexploitsthehuman-mediatedintroductionofGreenIguanas(Iguana iguana)ontoGrandCayman.
tAu
rA
eB
An
KS
Always Opportunistic
116 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 ReYnolDsAnDnIemIlleR
I n v a s I v e s P e c I e s
Island Invaders: Introduced amphibians and Reptiles in the Turks and caicos Islands
R.GrahamReynoldsandmatthewl.niemiller
Departmentofecologyandevolutionarybiology,Universityoftennessee,Knoxville,tennessee37996,UsA([email protected],[email protected])
theterm“invasive”usuallyreferstonon-nativespeciesthatarehav-ingatleastsomenegativeimpactonlocalfloralorfaunalcommuni-
ties.Invasivespeciesareamongthetopthreecausesofglobalbiodiversitydecline(lockwoodetal.2007),andunderstandingtheirdistributionsandavenuesofintroductionisimportantforregionalconservationandmanage-ment.moreover,anunderstandingofthebiologyandnaturalhistoryofinvadersmighthelptosuggestmethodsfortheircontrolandalsopredicteffectsonnativewildlife. Recently,much attentionhasbeenpaid to invasive reptiles andamphibians(Kraus2009).Reptilesandamphibiansmaybeespeciallygoodcolonizers,asevidencedbythenearlycircumtropicaldistributionofcertainspecies,suchasthebrahminyblindsnake(Ramphotyphlops braminus)andtheCanetoad(Rhinella marina). Islandsseemtobeparticularlyvulnerabletoinvasivespecies,asthesespeciesoftenarefreedfromthepressuresofnaturalenemies(predatorsandparasites)andcompetition(WhittakerandFernández-palacios2007).many tropical and subtropical islands contain unique herpetofaunalassemblagesthatarevulnerabletodisruptionbytheintroductionofnon-nativepredatorsandcompetitors.theWestIndiesisconsideredoneoftheworld’smostimportantbiodiversityhotspotsandtheregion’snativereptilesandamphibiansareofparticularconservationconcern(myersetal.2000,smithetal.2005).Centuriesofhabitatmodificationandtheintro-ductionofdamagingmammalianpredatorssuchasferalcats(Felis catus),Indianmongoose(Urva auropunctata),andblackRats(Rattus rattus)havenegativelyaffectedmanyreptilianandamphibianpopulations(e.g.,Iverson1978,Corke1992,smithetal.2005,tolsonandhenderson2006).Assuch,documentingandreportingthespreadandimpactofintroducedher-petofaunaremainsanimportanttask.
Fig. 1.theturksandCaicosIslandsarelocatedatthesouthernterminusofthebahamianArchipelago~130kmfromhispaniola.majorislandsandislandsmen-tionedinthetextarelabeled.
A
B
C
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 117InVAsIVespeCIes
Fig. 2.nativereptilesoftheturksandCaicos:(A)turksandCaicosRockIguana(Cyclura carinata),(b)turksandCaicosCurly-tailedlizard(Leiocephalus psam-modromus),(C)Caicosblindsnake(Typhlops platycephalus),(D)CaicosDwarfboa(Tropidophis greenwayi),(e)Antilleanskink(Mabuyasp.),(F)turksDwarfGecko(Sphaerodactylus underwoodi;female,left;male,right),(G)CaicosDwarfGecko(Sphaerodactylus caicosensis;male,bottom;female,top),(h)Caicos(hecht’s)barkingGecko(Aristelliger hechti),(I)turksIslandboa(Epicrates chrysogaster chryso-gaster),(J)southernbahamasAnole(Anolis scriptus scriptus).
r. G
rA
HA
M r
eyn
old
S A
nd
MA
ttH
ew l
. nie
Mil
ler
D E
F G
H I
J
118 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 ReYnolDsAnDnIemIlleR
WehavespentthelastfouryearsworkingintheturksandCaicosIslands(Fig.1)andhavemadeanefforttodocumentthepresenceanddis-tributionofnon-nativespeciesofthisarchipelago.theturksandCaicosIslands,locatedatthesouthernterminusofthebahamianArchipelago,containtenspeciesofnativereptiles,eightofwhichareendemicatthespeciesorsubspecies level (Fig.2).theremainingtwospecies (Anolis scriptusandMabuyasp.)arewidelydistributedinthesouthernbahamasandthroughouttheWestIndies.noamphibianspeciesisnativetotheturksandCaicos.Asofoctober2009,sevennon-nativereptilianandtwoamphibianspecieshavebeendiscoveredintheturksandCaicos,nearlydoublingthenumberofreptilesandaddingamphibiansinaregionwherepreviouslytheyhadnotbeendocumented.tourismandlargeinternationalinvestmentshaveresultedinexplosivedevelopmentoftheseislandsandasurgeinthenumberofimmigrantsfillingjobsintheconstructionandserviceindustries.Combinedwiththerapidincreaseinimports,thelistofinvadersmightcontinuetogrow.belowwediscussthedistributionandabundanceoftheknowninvasivereptilesandamphibiansintheturksandCaicos,andencourageotherresearcherstodocumentsimilarinvasionsinotherregionsthatsupportauniquenativeherpetofauna.
Cuban treefrog, Osteopilus septentrionalis. Established.Cubantreefrogs(Fig.3)arewidely introducedintheCaribbeanandsoutheasternUnitedstates,withpopulations onpuertoRico, in theVirginIslands,upperlesserAntilles,Florida,andelsewhere(hendersonandpowell2009).thesefrogsappearabletotoleratexericconditionsthatwouldpreventmostotheramphibiancolonistsfrombecomingestablished.Aslongastheyhaveaccesstoephemeralorpermanentsourcesoffresh-water,thesefrogscanbreedprolificallyandbecomeabundant.Cuban
treefrogsareofparticularconcernbecauseoftheirvoraciousappetites,highdensities,andnoxiousskinsecretions.AlthoughthisspeciesisnativetothelittleandGreatbahamabanks,itisgenerallyconsideredarecentarrivaltotheturksandCaicos,whereitisfirmlyestablishedontheislandsofprovidenciales,Grandturk,northCaicos,andmiddleCaicos,andwilllikelybefoundonseveralotherislandswiththeexpansionofirrigationfordevelopment.onnorthandmiddleCaicos,thesefrogsreachexcep-tionaldensities,oftencoveringtheroadafteraheavyautumnrain.endemicCaicosDwarfboas(Tropidophis greenwayi)haveevenshiftedtheirbehaviortofeedonthesefrogs,occupyingtheinteriorwallsofoldstonewaterwellstocapturemetamorphsastheyclimbupthesidesfromthewaterbelow(RGR,C.Deal,andn.manco,unpubl.data).Colorphotovouchers,AustinpeaystateUniversity(ApsU)19024,19027.
greenhouse Frog, Eleutherodactylus planirostris. Established.GreenhouseFrogs(Fig.4)aresmallterrestrialfrogsthatstowawayinsoilandplants,andhavebeenintroducedtoJamaica,Florida,andtheturksandCaicosIslandsfromtheirnativerangeinCuba,theCaymans,andthebahamas(hendersonandpowell2009).thisspeciesisadirect-developer,meaningthatthelarvalstageiscompletedintheegg.eggsarelaidinmoistleaflitter,andhatchlingsemergeasminiatureadults.GreenhouseFrogsoccurintheturksandCaicosontheislandsofprovidenciales,Grandturk,northCaicos,andmiddleCaicos,andwilllikelybediscoveredonotherislands.Colorphotovoucher,ApsU19023.
Red-Eared slider, Trachemys scripta elegans. Not established.Red-earedsliders(Fig.5)arepopularpetswithlonglifespans,andoftenarereleasedwhenownersgrowtiredofthem.nativetotheeasternandmid-westernUnitedstates,thesefreshwateraquaticturtleshavebeenintroducedtomanyislandsintheWestIndies,frompuertoRicoandhispaniolatoGuadeloupeandmartinique(hendersonandpowell2009).theyrequireaconsistentsourceoffreshwaterand,althoughthistypeofhabitatisrareintheturksandCaicos,severalpondsbuiltfortheleewardgolfcourseonprovidencialeslikelyprovidethemainrefugeforthisspecies.onlyafewadultRed-earedslidershavebeencapturedandremoved,althoughafewmoreprobablyoccurinthesemanmadeponds.nohatchlingsorjuvenileshavebeenobserved;hencewedonotconsiderthisspeciestobereproduc-ing.Colorphotovoucher,ApsU19021.
Antillean slider, Trachemys stejnegeri malonei. Established?AsingleAntilleansliderwascollectedin1975frompineCayontheCaicosbank(W.Auffenberg,UF49423),althoughseveralotherindividualswerereportedin1997fromafreshwaterpondonthesameisland(seidel1986,Fig. 3.Cubantreefrog(Osteopilus septentrionalis)fromnorthCaicos.
M. n
ieM
ille
r
Fig. 4.GreenhouseFrog(Eleutherodactylus planirostris)fromnorthCaicos.
M. n
ieM
ille
r
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 119InVAsIVespeCIes
1988;leeandRoss2001).thisspeciesisbelievedtobeahumanintroduc-tiontotheCaicosCays(seidel1988,1996)fromGreatInagua.Weareunawareofanyspecimensreportedsince1997,althoughpersistenceofthispopulationfrom1973to1997wouldindicatethatreproductionmightbeoccurring,unlessthespeciesisbeingrecurrentlyintroduced,asituationthatseemsunlikelyonthisprivatelyownedresortisland.
Wood slave, Hemidactylus mabouia. Established.Woodslaves(Fig.6)arerapidlyexpandingtheirrangeintheWesternhemisphere,andarefirmlyestablishedintheturksandCaicosIslands.theselizardsareexceptionallygoodcolonizersand,ashumancommensals,areaffordedfrequentopportunitiestostowawayincargo,whichisprob-ablyhowtheyarrivedintheturksandCaicos.theyarewidelydistributedintheturksandCaicosandarecurrentlyknownfromsixlargeislands:providenciales,northandmiddleCaicos,southCaicos,Grandturk,andsaltCay(Reynoldsandniemiller2009),althoughtheylikelyoccuronmanymore.WehavediscoverednestsonsaltCay(Fig.7)andhaverecordedjuvenilesandhatchlingsonallsixislands.thesegeckosprobablydonotrepresentagreatthreattomostofthelocalherpetofauna,exceptontheislandsofnorthCaicos,FrenchCay,andbigAmbergris,wheretheendemichecht’s(orCaicos)barkingGecko(Aristelliger hechti)occurs.thesenativegeckosareecologicallysimilartotheintroducedWoodslave,
occupyingverticalsurfacesoftrees,rockwalls,andbuildingsandfeedingonsmallflyingorclimbinginsects.Colorphotovouchers,ApsU18047,18945,18946,and18949.
Mayaguana dwarf gecko, Sphaerodactylus mariguanae. Established?mayaguanaDwarfGeckosarenativetothebahamianislandsofmayaguanaandboobyCay,locatedabout65kmtothenorthwestoftheturksandCaicos.Althoughsmall(sVlto41mm;schwartzandhenderson1991),theyaremuchlargerthanthenativeS. caicosensis (sVlto32mm)and S. underwoodi(sVlto32mm).Dwarfgeckoslikelymovebetweenislandsquiteeasilybecauseoftheirsmallsize,highfecundity,andproclivityforinhabitingstacksofbuildingsupplies,suchascinderblocksandlumber,aswellaspottedplants,soil,andmulch.moleculardatasuggestthatnativeS. underwoodimovebetweentheislandsofGrandturkandsaltCayoncargo(ReynoldsandKoneczny,inreview). schwartz(1968)andschwartzandhenderson(1991)reportedS. mariguanaefromGrandturk.toourknowledge,thisspecieshasnotbeenseenthereinquitesometime,buttherecordstandsinhendersonandpowell(2009).thisrecordlikelydoesnotrepresentamisidentification,as40individualswerecollected(AlbertschwartzFieldseries[AsFs]10766)andcomparedtootherpopulationsandtoS. underwoodi(schwartz1968);however,whether theseS. mariguanae individuals represent ahumanintroductionoranextensionofthespecies’nativedistributionisunclear.Also,thatthisspecieshasapparentlynotbeenrecordedsinceschwartz(1968)andwasneverfoundonotherislandsontheturksbankisnotable.schwartz(1968)speculatedthattheseGrandturkS. mariguanaerepre-sentedanintroducedpopulation,andevidencecurrentlyavailablecertainlyweighsinfavorofthispostulate,henceweincludethisspecieshereasanintroducedspecies.Grandturkisaheavilydevelopedisland,yetendemicS. underwoodiappearstobefairlycommon,andthusS. mariguanaemayyetpersistthere.
green iguana, Iguana iguana. Established?Aspopularpets,GreenIguanas(Fig.8)havebecomeestablishedinmanyareasoutsideoftheirnativerangeinCentralandsouthAmerica,perhapsmostnotablyinsouthernFlorida,wheretheyoccurinveryhighdensi-tiesnearresidentialareas.IntheturksandCaicos,afewGreenIguanashavebeenfoundonGrandturkandprovidenciales.theylikelyrepresentreleasedorescapedpets.Reproductionhasnotbeendocumented,butthisseemsalikelypossibilityifseveralmatureadultsoccurinthesamearea.Colorphotovoucher,ApsU19019.Fig 6.Woodslave(Hemidactylus mabouia)fromsaltCay,turksandCaicosIslands.
M. n
ieM
ille
r
Fig. 5.Red-earedslider(Trachemys scripta elegans)capturedneartheprovoGolfClubonprovidenciales,turksandCaicosIslandsandbeingheldatthenationalenvironmentalCentre.
r. G
rA
HA
M r
eyn
old
S
Fig. 7.hatchednestoftheWoodslave(Hemidactylus mabouia)underarockonsaltCay,turksandCaicosIslands.
M. n
ieM
ille
r
120 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 ReYnolDsAnDnIemIlleR
Cuban Knight Anole, Anolis equestris. Not established.likelyreleasedpets,fourCubanKnightAnoleshavebeencollectedandseveralmoresightedataGracebayresortonprovidencialesIsland.likeGreenIguanas,theselargearboreallizardsappeartothriveinappropriatehabitat,astheyalsoarequitecommonwheretheyhavebeenintroducedinsouthernFlorida(meshakaetal.2004).theyapparentlyarenotreproduc-ingintheturksandCaicos,althoughthatcannotyetberuledout,giventheabundanceoflushandirrigatedvegetationintheGracebayresortcom-plexes.Colorphotovouchers,ApsU19025,19026.
Brahminy Blind snake, Ramphotyphlops braminus. Established.essentiallyacircumtropicalspecies,thebrahminyblindsnake,whichisnativetotheIndiansubcontinent,hasproventobeanexceptionalcolo-nizerbecauseofitshabitofsequesteringitselfinpottedplantsanditspar-thenogeneticmodeofreproduction.thisspecieshasbeenfoundonbothprovidencialesandGrandturkandislikelytofinditswaytomanyoftheotherislandsinthearchipelago.Wecurrentlydonotknowwhetherbrahminyblindsnakescompetewiththeecologicallysimilarnativeblindsnakes(Typhlopssp.,sensus.b.hedges,in litt.),whicharemoreabun-dantonislandsotherthanGrandturkandprovidenciales.Colorphotovoucher,ApsU19022.
Eastern Corn snake, Pantherophis [Elaphe] guttatus. Not established.theCornsnake(Fig.9)isnativetothesoutheasternUnitedstatesandhasbeenintroducedelsewhereintheCaribbean,althoughitissuccessfullyestablishedonlyontheislandsofGrandCayman(schwartzandhenderson1991)andst.thomas(U.s.V.I.,hendersonandpowell2009).thesesnakesmighthavearrivedonislandsaseggslaidinthesoiloflargepot-tedtreesfromFlorida;however,escapedpetsalsoareapossiblemeansofconveyance.thusfar,threeadultshavebeenfoundonGrandturk,oneofwhichlaidaclutchofnon-viableeggsaftercapture(b.n.mancoandb.Riggs,pers.comm.).Colorphotovoucher,ApsU19020.
ConclusionstheturksandCaicoscontainauniqueassemblageofnativereptilespe-cies.threatsfromhabitatmodificationanddirectpersecution(i.e.,killingsnakes)aretakingatollonspeciessuchastheturksIslandboa(Epicrates chrysogaster)andtheturksandCaicosRockIguana(Cyclura carinata)(G.Gerber,unpubl.data;ReynoldsandGerber,inreview).threatsfrominva-sivemammalianspecies,suchascats,arewellestablished,andlocalreptilianpopulationshavesufferedtremendouslyfromtheirintroduction(Iverson1978,mitchelletal.2000).thedegreeofthreattolocalwildlifeposed
byintroducedreptilesandamphibiansislargelyunknownatthistime,however,thefirststepistodocumentsuccessfulinvasions.WeencouragefellowbiologistsandamateurherpetologistsintheWestIndiestotakenoteofintroducedspeciesandreportthemtolocalauthorities.
AcknowledgmentsWethankb.n.mancoandC.Dealforassistanceinthefield,andb.n.manco,b.Riggs,G.Gerber,m.hibbert,ande.salamancaforvaluableinformationregardingbothintroducedspeciesandreptilesintheturksandCaicos.thanksaswelltoA.F.scottforaccessioningphotovouch-erstotheAustinpeaystateUniversityCenterforFieldbiologymuseumin Clarksville, tennessee. We are grateful to W. Clerveaux and theDepartmentofenvironmentandCostalResources,turksandCaicosIslands,forscientificresearchpermits(#’s1-4RGReynolds),andtheturksandCaicosnationaltrustforlogisticalsupport.FinancialsupportfortheauthorswasprovidedbytheDepartmentofecologyandevolutionarybiology,Universityoftennessee,KnoxvillesummerResearchGrantprogram (RGR and mln), and the University of tennessee W.K.mcClurescholarshipforthestudyofWorldAffairs(RGR).thankstoR.W.henderson,R.powell,andG.perryforreviewsandhelpfulcom-mentsonthismanuscript.
ReferencesCorke,D.1992.thestatusandconservationneedsoftheterrestrialherpetofauna
oftheWindwardIslands(WestIndies).Biological Conservation62:47–58.
henderson,R.W.andR.powell.2009.Natural History of West Indian Reptiles and Amphibians.theUniversitypressofFlorida,Gainesville.
Iverson,J.b.1978.theimpactofferalcatsanddogsonpopulationsoftheWestIndianrockiguanaCyclura carinata.Biological Conservation14:63–73.
Kraus,F.2009.Alien Reptiles and Amphibians: A Scientific Compendium and Analysis.springer,newYork.
lee,D.s.andJ.p.Ross.2001.theCatIslandturtle,areptileofproblematicorigin,includingabibliographicreviewofthegenusTrachemysintheWestIndianregion,pp.36-47.In:C.Clark-simpsonandG.W.smith(eds.),Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on the Natural History of the Bahamas.GeraceResearchCenter,sansalvador,bahamas
lockwood, J.l., m.F. hoopes, and m.p. marchetti. 2007. Invasion Ecology.blackwellpublishing,malden,massachusetts.
meshaka,W.e.,Jr.,R.D.bartlett,andh.t.smith.2004.ColonizationsuccessbygreeniguanasinFlorida.Iguana11:155-161.
mitchell,n.,R.haeffner,V.Veer,m.Fulford-Gardner,W.Clerveaux,C.R.Veitch,andG.mitchell.2000.Cateradicationandtherestorationofendan-gered iguanas (Cyclura carinata)onlongCay,Caicosbank,turksandCaicosIslands,britishWestIndies,pp.206–212.In:C.R.Veitchandm.n.
Fig. 8.GreenIguana(Iguana iguana)capturednearlongbayonprovidencialesandbeingheldatthenationalenvironmentalCentre.
r. G
rA
HA
M r
eyn
old
S
Fig. 9.easternCornsnake(Pantherophis guttatus)capturedonGrandturk,turksandCaicosIslands,andbeingheldatthenationalenvironmentalCentre.
r. G
rA
HA
M r
eyn
old
S
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 121InVAsIVespeCIes
Clout(eds.),Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species.IUCnssC Invasivespecies specialistGroup, IUCn,Gland,switzerland andCambridge,UnitedKingdom.
myers,n.,R.A.mittermeier,C.G.mittermeier,G.A.deFonseca,andJ.Ke.2000.biodiversityhotspotsforconservationpriorities.Nature403:853–858.
Reynolds,R.G.andG.p.Gerber.Inprep.ecologyandconservationoftheendemicturksIslandboa(serpentes:boidae)onasmallsatelliteisland.
Reynolds,R.G.andn.Koneczny.Inreview.moleculardivergenceintwospeciesofbahamiandwarfgeckoes.Herpetologica.
Reynolds,R.G.andm.l.niemiller.2009.Hemidactylus mabouia.(Woodslave).Distribution.Herpetological Review40:452.
schwartz,A.1968.thegeckoes(Sphaerodactylus)ofthesouthernbahamaislands.Annals of the Carnegie Museum39:227–271.
schwartz,A.andR.W.henderson.1991.Amphibians and Reptiles of the West Indies: Descriptions, Distributions, and Natural History.UniversityofFloridapress,Gainesville.
seidel,m.e.1988.Revisionof theWest Indianemydid turtles (testudines).American Museum Novitates(2918):1–41.
seidel,m.e.1996.CurrentstatusofbiogeographyoftheWestIndianturtlesinthegenusTrachemys (emydidae),pp.169–174.In:R.powellandR.W.henderson(eds.),Contributions to West Indian Herpetology: A Tribute to Albert Schwartz.societyforthestudyofAmphibiansandReptiles,Ithaca,newYork.
smith,m.l.,s.b.hedges,W.buck,A.hemphill,s.Incháustegui,m.A.Ivie,D.martina,m.maunder,andJ.F.ortega.2005.CaribbeanIslands,pp.112–118. In:R.A.mittermeier,p.R.Gill,m.hoffman, J.pilgrim,t.brooks,C.G.mittermeier,J.lamoreaux,andG.A.b.daFonseca(eds.),Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions.CemeX,s.A.deC.V.,mexicoCity.
tolson,p.J.andR.W.henderson.2006.AnoverviewofsnakeconservationintheWestIndies.Applied Herpetology3:345–356.
Whittaker,R.J.andJ.m.Fernández-palacios.2007.Island Biogeography.2nded.oxfordUniversitypress,newYork.
cuban brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) in st. maarten
AxelFläschendrägerhalle,Germany([email protected])
photographsbytheauthor.
CubanbrownAnoles(Anolis sagrei)arenativetothebahamaIslands(Caysal,Conception,Crooked,Acklins,Grandbahama,little
bahama,RumCay,andsansalvadorislandbanks),Cubaandassociatedcays,IsladelaJuventud,andlittleCayman,includingmostsatellitesandcayswithevenrudimentaryvegetation.thespeciesalsohasbecomeestablishedinJamaica,eithernaturallyorthroughhumanmediation.morerecentlyintroducedpopulationsareknowninGrandCayman,swanIsland,Grenada,st.Vincent,theGrenadines(Canouan),barbados,theAtlanticCoastofméxicoasfarasbelize,theIslasdelabahía(offhonduras),Aruba,hawaii(oahuandCoconutIsland,Kauai),taiwan,thesoutheast-ernUnitedstates,andCalifornia(orangeCounty;hendersonandpowell2009andreferencestherein).Atleastsomeintroducedpopulationsorigi-natedinthesoutheasternUnitedstates. Within a30-minuteperiodon2march2010, I observed threemaleandtwofemaleAnolis sagrei inandaroundthephilipsburgharborinst.maarten.st.maartenisamajorcommercialcenterintheeasternCaribbean;anumberofexoticspecieshavebeenrecordedthere,andsev-eral(e.g.,Cubantreefrogs,Osteopilus septentrionalis;GreenIguanas,Iguana iguana)havebecomeestablished(powelletal.2005). AlthoughIdidnotobserveanyjuveniles,theabundanceofobserva-tionsinsuchashortperiodissuggestiveofabreedingpopulation.IdidobservenativeAnguillabankAnoles(Anolis gingivinus)associatedwithornamentalvegetationinandaroundtheharbor.Isawnoevidenceofcompetitiveinteractions,buttheapparentlyrestrictedrangeofA. sagreiissuggestiveofarecentarrival.Whetherthenewlyestablishedpopulationremainslargelyrestrictedtoseverelyalteredhabitats,ashasbeendescribedonGrenada(Greeneetal.2002,Germanoetal.2003)andst.Vincent(hendersonandpowell2005,treglia2006,tregliaetal.2008)remainstobedetermined.theoriginofthepopulationonst.maartenisunknown.
Literature CitedGermano,J.m.,J.m.sander,R.W.henderson,andR.powell.2003.herpetofaunal
communitiesinGrenada:Acomparisonofalteredsites,withanannotatedchecklistofGrenadianamphibiansandreptiles.Caribbean Journal of Science39:68–76.
male(top)andfemaleCubanbrownAnoles(Anolis sagrei)fromthephilipsburghar-boronst.maarten.photographicvouchershavebeendepositedinthemilwaukeepublicmuseum:mpmp745(male)andmpmp746(female).theidentityoftheselizardswasconfirmedfromphotographsbyRobertW.henderson.
122 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 DACostA,GoDbeeR,AnDAUstIn
Greene,b.t.,D.t.Yorks,J.s.parmerlee,Jr.,R.powell,andR.W.henderson.2002.Discoveryof Anolis sagreiinGrenadawithcommentsonitspotentialimpactonnativeanoles.Caribbean Journal of Science38:270–272.
henderson,R.W.andR.powell.2005.Geographicdistribution:Anolis sagrei.Herpetological Review36:467.
henderson,R.W.andR.powell.2009.Natural History of West Indian Reptiles and Amphibians.UniversitypressofFlorida,Gainesville.
powell,R.,R.W.henderson,andJ.s.parmerlee,Jr.2005.Reptiles and Amphibians of the Dutch Caribbean: St. Eustatius, Saba, and St. Maarten.st.eustatiusnationalparksFoundation,Gallowsbay,st.eustatius,netherlandsAntilles.
treglia,m.l.2006.Anannotatedchecklistoftheamphibiansandreptilesofst.Vincent,WestIndies.Iguana13:251–262.
treglia,m.l.,A.J.muensch,R.powell,andJ.s.parmerlee,Jr.2008.InvasiveAnolis sagreionst.VincentanditspotentialimpactonperchheightsofAnolis trinitatis.Caribbean Journal of Science44:251–256.
Knight anoles (Anolis equestris) on Grand cayman Island
matDaCosta-Cottam,KristanD.Godbeer,andtimAustin
Departmentofenvironment,CaymanIslandsenvironmentalCentre,GrandCayman([email protected])
KnightAnoles(Anolis equestris)arenativetoCuba,buthavebecomeestablishedinsouthernFlorida(KingandKrakauer1966)andhawaii
(mcKeown1996).secondaryintroductionsfromFlorida,primarilywithlandscapingvegetation,havebeendocumentedforseveralspecies(e.g.,Cubantreefrogs,Osteopilus septentrionalis,andCubanbrownAnoles,A. sagrei)onWestIndianislands(hendersonandpowell2009,andreferencestherein). on8June2007,wefoundaKnightAnoleonthegroundsoftheRitz-Carltonhotelonsevenmilebeach,GrandCaymanIsland(photo-graphicvoucher,milwaukeepublicmuseummpmp748,photographbyK.D.Godbeer,confirmedbyA.C.echternacht).subsequently,anaddi-tionalindividualwascollectedinthesavannaharea.bothpresumablyarrivedfromFloridawithdecorativeplants.todate,wehavenoevidencethatsuggeststhepresenceofabreedingpopulationinthewild.
Literature Citedhenderson,R.W.andR.powell.2009.Natural History of West Indian Reptiles and
Amphibians.UniversitypressofFlorida,Gainesville.
King,W.andt.Krakauer.1966.theexoticherpetofaunaofsoutheastFlorida.Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences29:144–154.
mcKeown,s.1996.A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians in the Hawaiian Islands.Diamondheadpublishing,lososos,California.
AKnightAnole(Anolis equestris)fromFlorida,thepresumedoriginoftheanimalsfoundonGrandCayman. St
even
j
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 123booKReVIeW
b o o K R e v I e W
Timber Rattlesnakes in Vermont and New York: Biology, History, and the Fate of an Endangered Species.2007.JonFurman.Universitypressofnewengland,lebanon,newhampshire(www.upne.com/1-58465-656-5.html).207pp.,12colorillustrations,8halftones.paperback–Isbn:978-1-58465-656-2.$24.95
AnnouncedbytheCenterfornorthAmericanherpetology(CnAh)in2008,thisauthoritativeandwell-illustratedbookisanimportantacqui-sition for all ofuswhowork to advance the conservationoftimberRattlesnakes(Crotalus horridus)throughoutthewiderangeofthespecies.ReadersmaywellwonderwhyIfeelthatabookgroundedinthebiologyofthisimpressivespeciesintwonortheasternstatesissorelevantelsewhere.simplyput,conservation—especiallyofvenomoussnakes—isadelicatebalanceofscience,sociology,andpolitics.Furmanhascarefullyresearchedandthoroughlydocumentedtheinterplayofthesethreeelementsastheyrelatetothesundry(andincreasing)anthropogenicthreatsfacedbytimberRattlesnakepopulationsintwoeasternstatesthatonlyinrelativelyrecenttimeshaverecognizedthespeciesasendangeredandhavemovedtotrytoreversedeclines(orevenextirpations)resultingfromearlierflawedmanage-mentpractices. A talentedwriter, Furman explores the troublingdecline of thenortheasternpopulationscausedbybountyhuntingfromthe1890stotheearly1970s.hisfriendshipswithcontemporaryresearcherssuchasRandystechert,Williambrown,andothers,whoseindividualandcombinedresearchandconservationworkwithCrotalus horridushavebeencrucialtoreversinghistoricaltrendsofpersecutionofthespecies,addsmuchtothebook.Vignettesofthelegalbattleswagedonbehalfofthesesnakes,alongwith Furman’s observations on thepersonalities involved and their var-ied approaches to preventing furtherhumandamage todens andbirthingareasoffereffectivemodelsofappropri-ateconservationmeasures. AnunusualaspectofthebookisthetimeFurmaninvestedininterview-ing themostnotedCrotalus horridusbounty hunters of the area. Despitethegreattollthesepeopletookonthesnakes,fewweremotivatedbyanimos-ity toward them. Rather, they werepeopleekingouta living ina largelyagriculturalareaduringdifficulteco-nomictimes,andtheysawthepoorlyconceivedstatebountiesonrattlesnakesas anotherway toearn income.oneortwoofthehunterswentsofarastostudywildandcaptiveCrotalus horridusbehavior,ecology(althoughnotusingthatterm),andphysiology,thebettertolocatesnakesandplytheirtrade.eventheinterviewsinvolvingpreparationof
rattlesnakeoilasananti-inflammatory,atopicthatinitiallybroughtasmirktomyface,provedvaluableinunderstandinganotheraspectofwhythehunterspursuedtheirquarry.so,delvingintothepharmacologicalliteratureinDecember2009,Ifoundthatcertainsnakeoilsarehigherineicosapentaenoicacid(omega-3)thanmanyfishoils(Kunin1989,Graber2007)!
overall,thebookissolidlyanchoredinbiology, sociology, and history of science.AlthoughpartsofFurman’soralhistoryinter-viewswithold-timebountyhuntersoftenareunpleasantforherpetologiststoread,theyareimportantforunderstandingthesociologicalrealitiesthathistoricallyhavehamperedcon-servation of any venomous snake species.Ifherpetologistsaretosuccessfullyworktochangepublic attitudes about rattlesnakes,suchunderstandingiscrucial(pisaniandFitch1993).
conservation of venomous snakes is a Delicate balance of science, sociology, and Politics
Geo
rG
e r
. piS
An
i
Amaledark-phaseCrotalus horridusfromWarrenCounty,newYork.
Literature CitedGraber,C.2007.snakeoilsalesmenwereonto
something.Scientific American,1november2007(availableonlineat:www.scientificam-erican.com/article.cfm?id=snake-oil-sales-men-knew-something).
Kunin,R.A.1989.snakeoil.Western Journal of Medicine151:208.
pisani,G.Randh.s.Fitch.1993.A surveyofoklahoma’s rattlesnake roundups.Kansas Herpetological Society Newsletter(92):7–15.
George R. PisaniKansasbiologicalsurvey
lawrence,Ks66047
124 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 nAtURAlhIstoRYReseARChRepoRts
Copperheads in the Northeastern united states
SmItH Et Al.(2009.Herpetological Monographs23:45–73) studied the spatial and reproduc-tiveecologyofapopulationofCopperheads(Agkistrodon contortrix) in a basalt trap-rockecosystem in the central Connecticut RiverValley,aregionthatconstitutesthenortheast-ernextremeofthisspecies’geographicrange.Adultmales(n=20)andfemales(n=15)weresurgically implanted with radio-transmittersandtrackedevery48hduringtheactivesea-son(April–october)forthreeconsecutiveyears(2001–2003).Fromlateautumntoearlyspring(novemberthroughmarch),whensnakeswerehibernating and thus inactive, tracking wasreducedtoonceperweek.Activityrangesizeandmultiplemovementparametersdifferedsig-nificantlybysex.throughouttheactiveseason,maleshadgreateractivityrangesizesandshowedgreatermovementthanfemales.thistrendwaspronouncedduringthematingseason,whichwasrestrictedtolatesummerandearlyfall(lateJulythroughseptember).IncontrasttomostpopulationsofA. contortrixfrommoresouthernandwesternlocalities,theauthorsobservednosexualactivity(e.g.,courtship,coitus,andmale-malefighting)inthespring.Individualsofbothsexesshowedannualfidelityto:(i)Activityrangelocation,(ii)activityrangesize,(iii)movementdistances,(iv)particularfeaturesoftheiractiv-ityranges (e.g., refuges),and(v)hibernationsites.malesandfemalesshowednodifferenceinpreferredseasonalhabitats.Inbothsexes,shiftsinhabitatassociationsduringtheactiveseasonincludedmigrationsfromover-winteringsiteswithinbasalttraprockslidestohigher-elevationopendeciduousforestduringthesummerforag-ingandreproductiveseason.parturitioninthefieldwasrecordedineightinstancesandwasalwaysclosetooneofthetwohibernaculausedbytheindividualsinthestudyarea.theauthorsdedicatedthispapertohenrys.Fitch.
secretive snakes in a grassland Community
Fitch(1999)summarizedhisfiftyyearsofinten-sivefieldworkonthesnakefaunaoftheFitchnaturalhistoryReservation(FnhR)andadja-centstudyareas,commentingupontherela-tivescarcityoftwosmall,secretivespecies,thesmoothearthsnake(Virginia valeriae)andthebrownsnake(Storeria dekayi).locationofapopulationofV. valeriae(pisani2005)asacom-ponentofadiversesnakefaunathatincludesS. dekayionlandadjacenttoFitch’smainstudyareasprovidedanopportunitytoaccumulateconsiderablenewinformationonthesespeciesinasimilarsnakecommunity.PISAnI(2009.Journal of Kansas Herpetology32:20–36)con-ducted an intensivemark-recapture studyofthiscommunityfromseptember2006through
november2008.theongoingstudyincludedobservationsonfeeding,defense,homerange,morphology,andpopulationsizesalongwithrelevantmicrohabitatcharacteristics.Dataaccu-mulated indicate considerably greater use ofavailablegrasslandhabitatbytheseandsyntopicsmallsnakespeciesthanhadbeenrecognized.Anextensivereviewof literatureandunpub-lisheddissertationsprovidedinsightstoaspectsofthecommunityinterrelationsofsmallver-mivoroussnakesinnortheasternKansas.theseinterrelationsareconsideredin lightof land-managementandotheranthropogenicfactorsaffectingtheabundanceofearthworms.
Eavesdropping lizardsmadagascarspinytail Iguanas (Oplurus cuvi-eri cuvieri)usetheirearstoeavesdroponthemadagascarFlycatcher’s(Terpsiphone mutata)alarmcallstoprotectthemselvesfrompredators.Ryo Ito AnD AkIRA moRI (2009.Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences277:1275–1280)conductedastudyintheAmpijoroadrydeciduousforestanddiscoveredthatthelizardsuseauditorysignalsforpredatordetection.theiguanashavewell-developedears,butarenotvocalliketheflycatchers.eavesdroppingisthefirststepforthelizard;itthenmovesitsheadwhilekeepingitsbodystilltohelpidentifythepredatorandevaluatetherisk.thelizardsandtheflycatchersdonothavedirectinteractionsnordo they compete for resources,but theydosharepredatorssuchasraptorsandsnakes.evidence suggesting that Galápagos marineIguanas(Amblyrhynchus cristatus)alsoeavesdroponheterospecificalarmcallsledtheresearcherstobelievethatthismightbeawidespreadphe-nomenoniniguanidlizards.
Repeated Adaptations of garter snakes to deadly Prey
Wheredothegeneticvariantsunderlyingadap-tivechangecomefrom?Arecurrentlyadaptivealleles recruited by selection from standing
madagascar spinytail Iguanas (Oplurus cuvieri cuvieri)eavesdroponthealarmcallsofmadagascarFlycatcherstoalertthemselvestopotentialpredators.
jiA
liA
nG
GA
o
n a T u R a l H I s T o R Y R e s e a R c H R e P o R T s
smoothearthsnakes(Virginia valeriae)andbrownsnakes(Storeria dekayi)exploitavailablegrasslandhabitats innortheasternKansastoamuchgreaterextentthanhadbeendocumented.
SuzA
nn
e l.
co
llin
S, c
nA
H
Unlike populations of Copperheads (Agkistrodon contortrix)frommoresouthernandwesternlocalities(likethissnakefromKansas),apopulationfromthenortheasternextremeofthespecies’rangeexhibitednosexualactivityinthespring.
Geo
rG
e r
. piS
An
i
pacificnewts,suchasthisCalifornianewt(Taricha torosa),containdeadlytetrodotoxinsthatarelethaltomanypotentialpredators.however,atleastthreespe-ciesofGartersnakesinthegenusThamnophishaveindependentlyevolvedaresistancetothosetoxinsandreadilypreyonnewts.
SuzA
nn
e l.
co
llin
S, c
nA
H
IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010 125
loggerhead turtles Nesting in Pakistan
RenownedturtleexpertnicolasJ.pilcher,whowasinKarachiforaseminaronthreatstothetur-tlesinpakistan,hasconfirmedthatathirdspecies,theloggerhead(Caretta caretta),wasalsonestingontheseshores.Untilnow,theonlytwospe-ciesrecordednestinginthecountrywereGreenturtles(Chelonia mydas)andasmallernumberofoliveRidleys(Lepidochelys olivacea).byfarthemostwidespreadnestingisbytheGreenturtle,fromtheeasternshoresofsindhprovinceallthewaytothewesternshoresofbalochistan.Recentfindings by the IUCn pakistan team, undertheauspicesofthebalochistanpartnershipsforsustainableDevelopmentproject, havedocu-mentedathirdspecies,theloggerhead,nestingatDaranbeach,some11kmsoutheastofJiwani. positiveidentificationofadultsandhatch-lingswasmadebyDr.nicolaspilcher,Co-ChairoftheIUCnmarineturtlespecialistGroup,andalong-timeturtleresearcherandconserva-tionist.somesixtynestswererecordedduring2009,andtheworkwillexpandinthecomingmonths todetermine the extentof thisnest-ing. loggerheads are known to nest in largenumbers inoman,onmasirahIsland,andasmallnumbernestinYemen,butthisisthefirstrecordofloggerheadnestinginpakistan.thislatestdiscoveryexpandsthenestingrangeforloggerheadsandraisestheirsurvivaloutlookinaclimatewherecriticalnestinghabitatsarebeingrapidlylosttodevelopment.thediscoveryalsoboostsknowndiversityofwildlifeinpakistan. pakistanusedtohostsubstantialnumbersofoliveRidleysalongtheshoresofsindhprovince,butmosthaveceasedtonest.Commercialfish-eriesarethemainreasonforthisdecline;withover1,900activetrawlersoperatingjustoffshore,turtleshavebeenaccidentallylosttofishingnets.trawlingforshrimpandfishisknownasoneofthemajorcausesofseaturtlemortality. luckilyfortheloggerheads,sindh-basedcommercialfisheriesdonotgenerallyoperateasfarawayasthewesternendofbalochistan,sotheturtleshaveavoidedthethreats.turtlescanbesavedfromdrowninginfishingnetsthroughtheuse ofturtleexcluderDevices (teDs),whicharecleveradaptationstonetsthatallowfishandshrimptoenterthenetbutturtlesto
escapethroughaspecialopening.theIUCnintendstoworkwithpartnersinthecountrytohelpintroduceandpromoteteDssothatfish-ingwillhavelessimpactonturtles.thismayalsoresultinthereappearanceofoliveRidleys. Forthepastseveraldecadesmarineturtleconservationprogramshavebeenunderwayinpakistan.mostnoticeableistheworkunder-taken in sindh province, on sandspit andhawkesbay,wherethousandsofturtleshavebeenprotectedthroughhatcheryenclosures.
IUCN 14February2010
New specialist group for Chameleons
ChameleonsareprimarilyfoundinmadagascarandAfrica,withafewspeciesdistributedintheneareastandalongthecoastofsoutherneurope.Althoughsomespecieshavebroaddistributions,manyhaveextremelysmallranges.Importanthabitatsforchameleonsareheavilyimpactedbyhumanactivities,andsomerestricted-rangespe-ciesareparticularlyvulnerable.becauseoftheiruniqueappearance,and, in somecases, theirexceptional ornamentation, chameleons areoneofthemostsought-afterreptilesinthepettrade.tensofthousandsofwildchameleonsarelegallyexportedeveryyear,which,withanillegaltradeatunknownlevels,iscauseforconcern.AChameleonspecialistGroupwasestablishedinFebruary2010toaddressissuesofsustain-abilityandconservationoftheseuniquereptiles.Itsfirstmajorobjectiveistoconductaconserva-tionassessmentofallchameleonspeciesfortheIUCnRedlist.
IUCN SSC e-bulletin march2010
n e W s b R I e f s
VeiledChameleons(Chamaeleo calyptratus)arebutoneofmanyspeciesexploitedinthepettrade.AnIUCnChameleonspecialistGrouphasbeenestablishedtoaddressissuesofsustainabilityandconservationofthesespectacularreptiles.
Stu
Ar
t B
erM
An
genetic variationwithinpopulations,movedthroughintrogressionfromotherpopulations,ordotheyariseasnovelmutations?FElDmAn Et Al.(2009.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:13415–13420) examined themolecularbasisofrepeatedadaptationtothetoxinofdeadlypreyinthreespeciesofGartersnakes (Thamnophis) to determine whether
adaptationevolvedthroughnovelmutations,sievingof existing variation, or transmissionofbeneficialallelesacrossspecies.Functionalaminoacidsubstitutionsintheskeletalmusclesodiumchannelarelargelyresponsibleforthephysiological resistance of Garter snakes totetrodotoxin found in their newt (Taricha)prey.phylogeneticanalysesrejectedthehypoth-
esesthattheuniqueresistanceallelesobservedinmultiplespeciesofThamnophiswerepresentbeforethesplitoftheselineages,orthatallelesweresharedamongspeciesthroughoccasionalhybridizationevents.theauthors’resultsdem-onstratedthatadaptiveevolutionoccurredinde-pendentlymultipletimesinGartersnakesviathede novoacquisitionofbeneficialmutations.
neWsbRIeFs
nestingloggerhead(Caretta caretta)havebeendocu-mentedatDaranbeach,nearJiwani,pakistan.
joSe
pH w
Hit
e
126 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
The patented ventilation system (US PAT# 7,481,183) provides
optimal ventilation and keeps the front glass free of moisture.
Different canopies available for all Exo Terra terrariumsThe digital meters simply
slide into place on the Exo Terra canopy
www.exo-terra.com
Double door to prevent escape
Ultra-fine stainless steel mesh cover
Free Background !
Raised bottom frame
Two cut-outs in the back provide easy hiding of multiple wires and/or tubing
editorsRobert Powell
executive editor AvilaUniversity,KansasCity,mo
AJ Gutman editor
bloomfield,Ct
Gad Perry Associate editor
texastechUniversity,lubbock,tX
Lilianna Gonzalez Assistant editor
texastechUniversity,lubbock,tX
Jim McDougalAssistant editor
Guilford,Ct
Michael Ripca Art Director
Atco,nJ
John Binns Graphics/Photography
InternationalReptileConservationFoundation,sanJose,CA
sandy Binns services Coordinator
InternationalReptileConservationFoundation,sanJose,CA
editorial boardAllison C. Alberts
ZoologicalsocietyofsanDiego
Frederic J. BurtonblueIguanaRecoveryprogram
Arthur C. echternachtUniversityoftennessee
L. Lee GrismerlasierraUniversity
Robert W. Hendersonmilwaukeepublicmuseum
John B. IversonearlhamCollege
Charles R. KnappZoologicalsocietyofsanDiego
Gunther Köhlersenckenbergmuseum
Kenneth L. KryskoFloridastatemuseumof
naturalhistory
Jan RamerIndianapolisZoo
thomas WiewandtWildhorizons
Copyright©2010bytheInternationalReptileConservationFoundation,Inc.Allrightsreserved.nopartofthisjournalmaybereproducedinanyformorbyanyelectronicormechanicalmeans,includ-inginformationstorageandretrievalsystems,withoutthepublisher’swrittenpermission.IRCF, Reptiles & Amphibians, Conservation and Natural History (Issn1098-6324)ispublishedquarterlybytheInternationalReptileConservationFoundation,anonprofit,tax-exemptorganization,3010magnumDrive,sanJose,CA.periodicalpostagepaidatsanJose,CA.
sTaTemenT of PuRPosethe International Reptile Conservation Foundation works to conserve reptiles and amphibians and the natural habitats and ecosystems that support them.
theInternationalReptileConservationFoundation,Inc.isanon-profit501(c)(3)Californiacorporation.
membeRsHIP InfoRmaTIonIRCF, REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS, CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY, the Journal of theInternationalReptileConservationFoundation,isdistributedquarterly.
AnnualRates:Individual u.s. Membership ........................................................................................................... $25.00Individual Membership, Digital (Adobe PDF)*.................................................................................$25.00Institutional u.s. subscription...........................................................................................................$30.00International Membership (including Canada)..................................................................................$55.00International Institutional subscription.............................................................................................$60.00
Additionalcopiesareavailableuponrequestat$6.00eachpluspostage.
*theAdobepDFisoptimizedforwebpublishinganddoesnotprovidethequalityandresolutionofthearchivalprintedversion,especiallynoticeableinphotographsandcomplexgraphics.
JoIn onlIne: www.IRcf.org
membeRsHIP [email protected],ortollfree1-877-472-3674(U.s.only),orwriteto:IRCF,3010magnumDrive,sanJose,CA95135
solIcITaTIonstheIRCFencouragescontributionofarticles,letterstotheeditor,newsitems,andannouncementsforpublicationinREPTILES & AMPHIBIANS.Generalarticlescandealwithanyaspectofreptilianoramphibianbiology,includ-ingconservation,behavior,ecology,physiology,systematics,orhusbandry.submissionofphotographstoaccompanyarticlesisencouraged.Guidelinesforsubmissionsandfiguresareatwww.ircf.org/about/submissions.manuscriptsmaybesubmittedviae-mail([email protected]).Authorsofonepageormoreofprintwillreceiveafreecopyofthejournalinwhichtheircontributionappears,andwillreceiveapDFfileoftheirarticlefordistribution.
DonaTIonsForanydonations,pleaseincludeyourname,address,phonenumber,ande-mailaddress.
aDveRTIsInG PolIcYWeadvertiseonlynon-livingproducts(exceptfeederinsects).Foradvertisingratesandoptionscontactsandybinns,AdvertisingDirector,[email protected],sanJose,CA95135.
thesecondinstallmentofouryear-longtributetohenrys.Fitchappearsinthisissue.Athirdinstallmentwill
beintheseptemberissueandthefourthandfinalportionwillappearinDecember.Wewouldliketothink
thatDr.Fitchwouldhaveenjoyedthesenotesandarticlesaboutthenaturalhistoryoftheanimalstowhichhe
devotedmuchofhisprofessionallife.
AlsointhisissueisthesecondinclusionofourInvasivespeciessection,documentingspeciesofamphib-
iansandreptilesinplaceswheretheydonotoccurnaturallyanddonotbelong.Alienspeciesareamajorand
growingconcernfortheconservationofnativeandendemictaxathroughouttheworld.Althoughinteresting,the
accountsthatappearinthissectiondocumentatragedyimposedonnaturalbiotas.WeaskthatreadersofReptiles &
Amphibiansnotcontributetothisproblembyreleasingcaptiveanimalsintonatureorbypatronizingirresponsible
breedersandmerchants.
theeditorsofReptiles & Amphibians
Editors’ Remarks
128 IRCFReptIles&AmphIbIAns•Vol17,no2•JUn2010
Order online at:www.IRCF.org/LBB
Published by the IRCF
Award-winning conservation biologist Fred Burton has released a fascinating new book about saving one of the most endangered reptile species on earth. “The Little Blue Book: A short History of the Grand Cayman Blue Iguana” is the true story of how a noble and charismatic iguana is rescued from the brink of extinction. An engaging read and a beacon of hope for the conservation of reptiles.
Blue Iguana Story in Print
180 pages$19.95 plus p&p Maps & rare photographsRichly illustrated in full colorActual history and natural historyBlue cloth hardcover with dust jacketMore details online at www.ircf.org/LBB
one
of t
he m
ost p
robl
emat
ic in
vasiv
e sp
ecie
s in
the
Wes
t Ind
ies i
s the
Cub
an t
reef
rog
(Oste
opilu
s sep
tent
rion
alis)
, with
man
y in
trod
uctio
ns o
f a se
cond
ary
natu
re o
rigi
natin
g fr
om in
trod
uced
pop
ulat
ions
in
Flor
ida
and
disp
erse
d pr
imar
ily w
ith n
urse
ry p
lant
s. t
hese
frog
s re
adily
act
as
hum
an c
omm
ensa
ls an
d ha
ve a
cat
holic
die
t tha
t inc
lude
s ot
her
vert
ebra
tes.
seve
re e
colo
gica
l effe
cts
are
likel
y, e
spec
ially
whe
n th
ese
frog
s inv
ade
rela
tivel
y na
tura
l are
as.
John Magor