Iraq Decommissioning Project - Nucleus Documents/Meetings/3r… · •Adaya . LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ...

37
Eric K. Howell Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Waste and Environmental Safety Section Department of Nuclear Safety and Security OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES AT LEGACY SITES INVOLVED IN THE IRAQ DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

Transcript of Iraq Decommissioning Project - Nucleus Documents/Meetings/3r… · •Adaya . LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ...

  • Eric K. Howell

    Decommissioning and Remediation Unit

    Waste and Environmental Safety Section

    Department of Nuclear Safety and Security

    OVERVIEW OF ACTIVITIES AT LEGACY

    SITES INVOLVED IN THE

    IRAQ DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

  • BACKGROUND

    • During the 1980’s, Iraq developed infrastructure for a nuclear weapons programme (facilities for mining,

    refinement, and enrichment, and weaponisation of uranium).

    • In 1991, Coalition Forces bombed and destroyed most of Iraq’s nuclear facilities.

    BEFORE AFTER

  • BACKGROUND

    • The bombings as well as subsequent looting and neglect has led to the dispersal of radioactive material.

    • The dispersal of radioactive material has led to environmental safety and public health concerns.

  • BACKGROUND

    • Many sites have been characterised and require significant efforts dedicated to decommissioning and

    remediation.

  • BACKGROUND

    • Iraq petitioned the IAEA in 2004 for assistance in cleaning up the damaged nuclear facilities and managing

    radioactive wastes including the support and assistance in:

    • Development of legal and regulatory infrastructure

    • Assessment and characterisation of the facilities’ current state

    • Development of decommissioning and waste management strategies

    • Implementation of the overall decommissioning and remediation plans

  • BACKGROUND

    • There has been significant support from the international community both technically and fiscally: European

    Commission, France, Germany, Italy, Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom,

    and United States of America.

  • IAEA’S ROLE

    • To facilitate the activities petitioned by the Government of Iraq by coordinating with

    internal and external stakeholders.

    • Internal: Technical Cooperation, Waste and Environmental Safety Section, Regulatory Infrastructure

    and Transportation Safety Section, Office of Legal Affairs, Waste Technology Section, Radiation

    Safety and Monitoring Section, and Seibersdorf Laboratories.

    • External: Iraqi Ministries of Science and Technology, Environment, Health, and Higher Education,

    international governments (USA, EC, Ukraine, Spain, France, Germany, Russian Federation, Italy, UK,

    South Africa, etc.) and organizations (Texas Tech University, Sandia National Laboratories, US

    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, International Radioecology Laboratory, etc.).

  • IAEA’S ROLE

    • Organization of technical progress and planning meetings

    • Assistance with procurements

    • Fellowship placement

    • Provide extensive training in program management, legal and regulatory development,

    waste management, as well as technical training in laboratory techniques, radiation

    control and safety, and quality management.

    • Organization of site visits (waste disposal facilities, uranium ore and refining facilities, and

    nuclear emergency response sites)

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Three types of legacies:

    • Uranium mining and ore processing legacies

    • Abu Skhair, Akashat, Al Qa’im, Geo-Pilot

    • Nuclear technology site and application legacies including results of accidents on

    those sites

    • Al Tuwaitha, Al Jesira, Djerf al Naddah, Rashidiya, Al Furat, Tarmiya, Al Atheer,

    Ash Sharqat, Taji

    • Accident legacy sites remote from the site of the accident

    • Adaya

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Uranium mining – Abu Skhair and Akashat

    Dwellings near uranium mine at Akashat

    Akashat uranium mine

    /wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Phosphate_plant_in_Akashat.jpg/wikipedia/commons/9/96/Villiage_of_Sikak_in_Akashat,_Iraq.jpg

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Ore processing – Al Qa’im

    Uncontrolled barrel of yellowcake

    Uranium ore processing for the production of yellowcake

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Ore processing – GeoPilot

    Decommissioning activities

    Uranium refinement facility in downtown Baghdad

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Al Tuwaitha

    Destroyed Tammuz-2 reactor

    Destroyed IRT-5000 reactor

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Al Jesira

    Temporary waste storage tank

    Destroyed UCl4 conversion facility

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Djerf al Naddah

    Storage area for spent fuel rods

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Rashidiya

    Centrifuge design and testing

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Al Furat

    Centrifuge design,

    assembly, and test

    facility

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Tarmiya

    Compromised structural integrity

    Destroyed EMIS facility

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Nuclear Technology Sites and Application Legacies – Al Atheer

    Destroyed weapons assembly and testing facility

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Accident Legacy Sites – Adaya

  • LEGACY SITES IN IRAQ

    • Accident Legacy Sites – Adaya

    The site is made up of large mounds of rubble on a sloping terrain

    Yellowcake has been found on the surface as well as in buried barrels

  • LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

    • At the commencement of the project in 2006, there were two regulatory bodies in Iraq:

    • The Radiation Protection Centre (RPC) as part of the Ministry of Environment was established under

    Law 99 (1980) with the objective of licensing radiation sources, regulating worker exposure, and

    undertaking environmental monitoring.

    • The Iraq Radioactive Sources Regulatory Authority (IRSRA), reporting to the Office of the Prime

    Minister, was established in 2004 under Coalition Provisional Authority Order 72 (CPA 72) with the

    objective of securing the regulation and control of sealed sources within Iraq.

    • There were gaps and overlap in the scope of their regulatory roles. However, neither

    body had any involvement or experience in regulation.

  • LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

    • The Ionising Radiation Control Law – IRCL

    • IAEA and international experts assisted Iraq in drafting a new law to replace the

    existing laws which would establish a new regulatory body and create a system of

    licensing and control for all nuclear facilities and radiation sources within Iraq.

    • Current Status:

    • The law is currently undergoing final approvals before being enacted by the Iraqi

    Parliament.

    • Decommissioning planning and implementation has been ongoing since 2008.

  • LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

    • A comprehensive set of regulations were drafted with the assistance of IAEA and USNRC

    from 2006-2008.

    • The chapters drafted were as follows:

    • General Requirements: Radiation Protection and Licensing

    • Decommissioning

    • Waste Management

    • Waste Disposal

    • Transport of Radioactive Materials

    • Security

  • LEGAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

    • The implementation of regulatory oversight has proven challenging for a number of reasons.

    • Iraq has no history of regulatory oversight

    • There was no single regulatory body

    • The facilities had no existing licenses

    • No existing safety cases

    • No regulatory capacity

    • Operator had no culture of responding to regulatory requirements

    • The law establishing a regulatory framework has not been enacted

    • From 2007, agreement for “shadow working”

    • RPC has been designated by the Council of Ministers as the regulator for decommissioning activities thus far

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Building Decommissioning Capacity

    • Meetings presenting key IAEA documentation early in the project

    • Site visits (waste disposal facilities, uranium ore and refining facilities, and nuclear

    emergency response sites) from 2007 to present to give practical demonstration of

    other countries’ experiences

    • Consultations with international experts on decommissioning strategies and plans as

    well as their respective regulatory components

    • Emphasis on the need for proper planning and quality assurance as well as the

    establishment of safety assessments of the proposed activities and regulatory review

    of the proposals

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Development of a Radiation Protection Department

    • Ensuring radiation worker safety as well as public and environmental safety

    • Surveillance and recording under the control of RPC

    • TLDs, electronic dosimeters, air and soil sampling, contamination surveys,

    physical and biological examinations

    • Provide adequate instrumentation including maintenance and calibration

    • Provide appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment

    • Coordination with a Safety Department over structural safety

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Development of a Radiation Protection Programme

    • Documentation supporting activities applicable to a range of applications and projects:

    • Radiation protection organization and responsibilities

    • Radiation protection officer training and qualification

    • Radiation protection zoning of areas

    • Access and egress control

    • Material and waste receipt and release

    • Workplace monitoring and control

    • Dose limitation and reference levels

    • Dosimetry

    • Clearance of materials and release of sites

    • Task assessment and authorization

    • Worker training, medical surveillance and administration

    • Radiation protection event management

    • Effluent and discharge management

    • Transportation

    • Optimization principle application

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • A Technical Meeting in November 2010 focused on regulatory inspections

    • Rights of access to sites for inspections (even unannounced)

    • Knowledge of activities and development of plans for inspections

    • Priority of safety component

    • Necessity of corrective actions

    • Focus on compliance with license and procedures

    • Operator quality assurance management system

    • Inspection of operator’s quality assurance records and inspections

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Many other meetings and fellowships have been provided to the regulatory agency

    addressing:

    • Legal and regulatory framework for inspections

    • Basic fundamentals of inspections

    • Types of inspections for decommissioning and waste management facilities and transportation

    • Competencies needed to conduct inspections

    • Preparation of general procedures and guides for conducting inspections

    • Planning and organizing inspections

    • Inspection reports and findings: identifying, documenting, and resolution of problems

    • Development, management, and enforcement of corrective actions

    • Inspection and enforcement assessments

    • Oversight and objectivity

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Regulatory Oversight of LAMA Decommissioning

    • RPC contracted inspectors from the Iraq International Centre for Science and

    Industry (IICSI) who requested:

    • The decommissioning organization structure and the responsibilities of key personnel in the

    project

    • A list of procedures to be used in Stage 1

    • Medical examination certificates of the workers

    • Instrument calibration and related procedures

    • RPC authorised LAMA Stage 2 decommissioning in May 2009

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Regulatory Oversight of LAMA Decommissioning

    • RPC presented a review of regulatory activities during LAMA decommissioning in

    May 2010

    • Regulatory inspections in Stages 1 and 2

    • Regulatory process for Stages 3 and 4

    • IAEA Safety Standards being applied for licensing

    • List of relevant safety requirements

    • Occupational dose limits

    • Public dose limits

    • Clearance levels for sites

    • Release levels for sites

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Lessons learned from LAMA decommissioning

    • There has been a gradual growth in regulatory competence

    • The interaction between the operators and regulators has improved

    • There is work to do in developing regulatory processes in line with international

    standards

    • Instrumentation detection limits

    • Detection needs for specific radionuclides unknown

    • Standards of documentation including properly developed safety cases

    • Competence in document review and inspection

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Decommissioning of the Geopilot facility was successfully planned, implemented, and

    cleared by the regulatory authority

    • Decommissioning of the Italian Isotope facility is ongoing

    • Lessons learned from these activities include:

    • Need for approach in control and measurement of internal occupational exposure

    • Need for properly structured decommissioning plans supported by safety

    cases/reports

    • Need for standard operating procedures

    • Need for more rigorous regulatory scrutiny

    • Need for equipment with appropriate detection limits

  • REGULATORY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT

    • Phase 2 Decommissioning

    • Tammuz-2

    • IRT-5000

    • Adaya

    • Fuel Fabrication Facility

  • THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

    BEFORE AFTER

    Completion of LAMA Decommissioning