IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy · 2016-01-14 · Capa C ity Development...

IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy

Ca

paC

ity

Dev

elo

pmen

t

eNg

022012

Ca

paC

ity

Dev

elo

pmen

t

International Plant Protection ConventionProtecting the world’s plant resources from pests

022012

this paper presents the ippC national phytosanitary capacity development strategy divided by areas, agreed for implementation by the 5th Commission on phytosanitary measures (2010) and the logical framework and work plan endorsed by the Commission in 2012, at Cpm-7. the work presented herein has been prepared and reviewed by contracting parties, regional plant protection organizations, donors, international organizations and phytosanitary experts from seven Fao regions. it also presents an agreed definition of national phytosanitary Capacity.

march 2010, Revised in 2012

IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy

the designations employed and the presentation of material in this

information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever

on the part of the Food and agriculture organization of the United

nations (Fao) concerning the legal or development status of any country,

territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation

of its frontiers or boundaries. the mention of specific companies or

products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented,

does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by Fao in

preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.

the views expressed in this information product are those of the authors

and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fao.

all rights reserved. Fao encourages the reproduction and dissemination

of material in this information product. non-commercial uses will be

authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other

commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees.

applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate Fao copyright

materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be

addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, publishing

policy and Support Branch, office of Knowledge exchange, Research and

extension, Fao, viale delle terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, italy.

© Fao 2012

3

i p p C n a t i o n a l p h y t o S a n i t a R y C a p a C i t y D e v e l o p m e n t S t R a t e g y

Contents

Concept paper on National Phytosanitary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

phytosanitary Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5

Situation analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5

Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6

logical Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8

table 1. national phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(summary of strategic areas showing goals) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8

table 2. logical Framework for the ippC national phytosanitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Capacity Development Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Work plan for the IPPC Strategy on Capacity Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13table 3. the ippC Capacity Development Workplan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

4

Concept paper on National Phytosanitary Capacity

Introduction the purpose of this paper is to establish a common

understanding of what is meant by national

phytosanitary capacity. this provides the basis

for assessing capacity assets and needs, and for

formulating, implementing and evaluating capacity

development responses.

Phytosanitary Capacity national phytosanitary Capacity is defined as:

“The ability of individuals, organizations and systems of a country to perform functions effectively and sustainably in order to protect plants and plant products from pests and to facilitate trade, in accordance with the IPPC”.

the following concepts expand this definition, which

applies to the national phytosanitary capacity of

contracting and non-contracting parties. + By referring to the individuals, organizations and

systems of a country, it is recognized that national

phytosanitary capacity combines the knowledge

and functions of many entities in a country, not

just nppos. + By referring to systems of a country, it clarifies

that national capacity includes the ability for

individuals and organizations to cooperate and

communicate, both formally and informally.

Such cooperation may be national, regional and

international. + the functions which need to be performed are

technical, legal, administrative, and managerial.

Capacity includes the ability to develop and

apply knowledge, skills and tools appropriate to

these functions. + each country will have its own level of capacity

and it is recognized that phytosanitary capacity

is not static and changes over time.

+ the phytosanitary capacity, current or aspired

to, will be influenced by overarching national

policies and international obligations that may

or may not be directly related to plant health

considerations. + many things contribute to the sustainability of

the performance of functions. these include but

are not limited to:

– an enabling environment in countries

such as policies which allow plant health

activities to evolve and adapt to changing

circumstance; plant health regulations

which empower nppos to function;

visibility and understanding of the ippC

and understanding of the importance of

implementation

– private-public partnerships

– programs for staff retention

– mobilization of resources, including cost

recovery policies

– viable business plan(s) for protecting plant

health and trade

– national commitment to sustain

phytosanitary capacity + the definition for phytosanitary capacity

refers to the ability to protect plants and plant

products from pests. this ability to support

biosecurity also contributes to achieving

other national or international goals under

other initiatives which deal with protecting

biodiversity, food security, and poverty

reduction. + Referring to the ippC in the definition aligns

national phytosanitary capacity with the

Convention.

5

Introductiona strategy is a plan of action designed to work

towards a vision, or a future desired situation ideally

starting from a known current situation or starting

point. a strategy facilitates decision making and

provides a framework for effective action.

Vision statementnppos able to effectively and sustainably service

the needs of their country in the protection of plants

and plant products and the facilitation of trade.

achievement of this vision would result in:

a all contracting parties implementing the

iSpms they need.

b all contracting parties meet their

obligations under the ippC.

c the ippC reflects the goals of all its

members.

d phytosanitary capacity of contracting

parties evolving in response to changing

circumstances

e phytosanitary issues embedded in policy

f effective regional cooperation

Situation analysisan analysis of the current capacity of ippC

member countries to implement the ippC and to

fulfil their obligations as ippC members, provides

the justification and a starting point for the

phytosanitary capacity develoment strategy.

various phytosanitary capacity situation analyses

have been carried out over the past two or three

years for a variety of purposes. the results of

these analyses provide at least a partial situation

description of the current capacity of ippC member

countries and the capacity of the ippC community

overall (encompassing the Cpm, the ippC

Secretariat, the nppos, and the contracting parties)

to develop further capacity among its members.

National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy

+ the independent evaluation of the workings

of the ippC and its institutional arrangements

analyzed the technical assistance activities

of the ippC Secretariat, the decisions and

follow-up of (i)Cpm decisions, and made

recommendations regarding technical

assistance and strengthening phytosanitary

capacity. the evaluation included the

observations that: there have been no

priorities set for capacity building activities

by the ippC Secretariat; staff resources in the

Secretariat were not sufficient to carry out

tCp projects and provide follow up; scarce

Secretariat resources were used for non-core

ippC capacity development activities; there

was little donor involvement in phytosanitary

capacity development projects. the evaluation

recommended that ippC should not be involved

with phytosanitary capacity development

projects, except for core activities such as

training workshops for the implementation

of standards, ippC meeting attendance and

support to the international phytosanitary

portal. the Cpm rejected the recommendation

and decided to develop a phytosanitary

capacity development strategy.

+ the discussion paper prepared by the World

trade organization for the oeWg-BnpC (open

ended working group on building national

phytosanitary capacity which met in 2008) on

building national phytosanitary capacity showed

that plant protection projects are typically last

on the list when it comes to disbursements

related to training. it also noted that the

confidentiality of the results of the phytosanitary

capacity evaluation tool (pCe) limits its

usefulness from the perspective of coordinating

technical cooperation activities.


6

+ the evaluation carried out by CaBi of the

pCe showed that the pCe is a valuable tool in

assessing a country’s phytosanitary capacity, but

falls short in several areas and is not always used

as the basis for national development plans.

+ the oeWg-BnpC (2008) noted that:

– there is often poor communication on

the importance of plant protection within

countries; national governments may

set policies and priorities that are not

in line with the objective of preventing

the spread of plant pests; public/private

partnerships are useful and essential to the

sustainability of plant protection programs;

regional approaches work; there is a need

for information of new and emerging plant

pest issues.

– “plant protection” and “plant quarantine”

do not capture attention in the way that

“biosecurity” does.

– other agreements such as the SpS

agreement have a signficant impact on the

work of the ippC.

– the low profile of ippC internationally and

of plant protection programs nationally,

resulting in a perceived non-importance

of plant protection, has resulted in few

available resources and difficulty in acquiring

resources, both for the Secretariat and to

carry out the work programme of the ippC.

+ the oeWg-BnpC (2008) recognized that:

– implementation of standards can be

complex, involving many different areas.

Currently there is a gap between the

development of standards and their

implementation.

– the proposed implementation review

and support system, in particular the

establishment of a help desk for the ippC has

not progressed.

– not all Rppos are equal and activities

suggested to be carried out by Rppos will

not all be carried out to the desired level.

– there are a range of other geopolitical

groupings that are relevant to the ippC.

– the capacity levels of countries are very

different. thus a one-size-fits-all approach

will not work.

– phytosanitary capacity building is going on,

but often the different initiatives are not

well coordinated. there is a need to find out

where the gaps are and prevent duplication.

– the lack of resources are a significant

limiting factor to capacity building.

– the availability of expertise to develop and

deliver capacity building is sometimes a

limiting factor.

+ the oeWg-BnpC (2009), which met in

December 2009, ammended the national

phytosanitary Capacity Building Strategy for

presentation to Cpm-5.

Strategythe strategy describes the components of a global

framework in which stakeholders at national,

regional and international level, each have a role to

play in building the capacity of nppos. the strategy

emphasizes the key role of the nppo. however, it

recognizes that the nppos should be supported by

a number of entities if these national institutions

are to be strengthened. the strategy was initially

divided in 6 strategic areas and for clarity purposes

and after consideration of the work plan in 2012, is

presented divided into the following 8 areas with

the principal stakeholders identified:

7


Code Strategic areas Key Stakeholder Secondary Stakeholders

ST1 1. National phytosanitary planning Under this strategic area, the goal is to enhance national phytosanitary systems planning, management and leadership. nppos play the lead role since they are charged to prepare the national phytosanitary action plans.

nppos technical assistance providers (national, regional and international)

ST2 2. Standard setting Under this strategic area, the goal is to improve capacity of contracting parties to participate in ippC standard setting process. the ippC is the lead entity since it has the responsibility to manage the process and help ippC contracting parties to enhance their effective participation.

ippC nppos, Rppos, ReCs etc.

ST3 3. Standards implementation Contracting parties (and non-contracting parties) are able to implement iSpms in line with their needs. this is particularly challenging since nppos have varying national priorities and resource constraints. Understanding their needs and responding to them remains a challenge. the support that nppos receive from their own governments to enhance their capacities also varies greatly, in particular, considering the importance that agriculture has in national policy. the ippC has an important role as a techncial assistance provider, to make available techncial resources to enhance global implementationof the Convention and its standards.

nppos all others and technical assistance providers (national, regional and international)

ST4 4. Coordination and communication Under this strategic area, the goal is to ensure that there is coordinated phytosanitary capacity development addressing priority needs. the ippC plays a central role to ensure that phytosanitary capacity development actions actually address the needs identified by nppos and Rppos, that appropriate linkages are performed with donor organizations and possible opportunities for mentoring and coaching are identified.

ippC nppos, technical assistance providers and all others (national, regional and international)

ST5 5. Pest Information Under this strategic area, the goal is to enhance the capability of nppos to provide plant pest information. in some cases, the provision of this information is considered an obligation of ippC contracting parties and in other cases it is intended to call the attention on emerging phytosanitary issues.

ippC nppos, Rppos, ReCs and technical assistance providers etc.

ST6 6. Resource Mobilization (Fundraising) Under this strategic area, the goal is to enhance capacity of nppos to mobilize funds to ensure sustainablity of their programmes. the ippC’s own ability to support iSpm development and implementation is of paramount importance under this strategic area. the promotion of the ippC and the national phytosanitary systems considered in the strategic area of advocay, are some of the most important purposes of this strategy, as key tools to mobilize resources.

nppos ippC, Rppos, ReCs and donors etc.

ST7 7. Advocacy Under this strategic area, the goal is to improve capacity to promote national phytosanitary systems. nppos have the challenge to promote the importance they play at the national level, particularly where trade, environment and food security are concerned. likewise, the poor record of the ippC to gain international attention of its importance and relevance outside of the Cpm underscores the need for better promotion and communication. the promotion of the ippC and the national phytosanitary systems are some of the most important purposes of this strategy, as key tools to mobilize resources and to clearly establish the role and hierarchy of the Convention.

nppos ippC, Rppos, ReCs etc.

ST8 8. Monitoring and evaluation Under this strategic area, the goal is to ensure that phytosanitary capacity development is actively monitored, evaluated and lessons learned acted upon. there is considerable gaps in the knowledge of the extent of implementation of iSpms and the impact of capacitiy development actions by technical assistance providers globally. many nppos, in particular, lack the tools necessary to document their activities in order to promote appropriate national policies, new regulations and any other actions, since they lack approaches to assess their impacts involving broad ranges of stakeholders.

nppos ippC, Rppos, ReCs etc.

8

the strategic areas above can be addressed

individually or in combination with other areas.

Strategic areas 4, 6, 7, and 8 can be considered

cross-cutting and are often referenced in the other

strategic areas.

the result of the implementation of the

strategy is the prospective achievement of the

identified vision, i.e. “nppos able to effectively and

sustainably service the needs of their country in

the protection of plants and plant products and the

facilitation of trade”.

table 1 below summarizes the national

phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy, as

reviewed by the expert Working group on Capacity

Development (eWg CD) for presentation to Cpm-7

in 2012.

Logical Framework the strategy is further elaborated in corresponding

logical frameworks and workplans prepared for

each strategic area identified.

table 2 below shows the logical framefork for the

strategy, divided by area and including the overall

impact/goal and outcome/purpose of each of them.

the table contains the key indicators, means of

verification and risks/assumptions proposed.

all the information contained in the table

is particularly useful for nppos at the time to

elaborate their national phytosanitary action

plans and for donors to get a clear picture of the

expected outcomes in strenghtening national

phytosanitary capacities.

Table 1. National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy (summary of strategic areas showing goals)

Strategic Areas goals Outcome and Purpose Activities

1. national phytosanitary planning

enhanced national phytosanitary systems planning, management and leadership

• develop methods and tools to help countries assess and prioritize their phytosanitary needs, including gap analysis

• support preparation of national phytosanitary action plans (npaps)

• assist in project preparation to address priorities (legislation, surveillance, etc)

• implement pCe improvements from the CaBi review

• review the oie-pvS (and iiCa phytosanitary pvS tool) and use as basis to develop a new more comprehensive gap analysis process for phytosanitary needs (including stakeholders; peer review step etc.)

• develop tools and guidelines for preparing npaps

• encourage inclusive approaches for preparing npaps

• follow up on assessment with national phytosanitary capacity strategy

2. Standard setting Capacity of contracting parties to participate in IPPC standard setting improved

• enhance countries’ effective participation in Cpm (and in the standard setting process)

• assess participation of countries at Cpm• develop orientation programme for new Cpm

delegates to participate in Cpm (immediately prior to Cpm)

• facilitate regional discussion on Cpm positions (in region or immediately prior to Cpm), and coordination during meetings

• continue regional draft standards workshops• encourage and support participation in expert

working groups, technical panels

3. Standards implementation

Contracting parties (and non-contracting parties) are able to implement ISPMs in line with their needs

• establish and adopt standards implementation review and support system (iRSS)

• develop guidelines/tips for implementation• provide help desk • develop training materials, deliver training,

feedback mechanisms from workshops • develop list of experienced facilitators for

implementing iSpms• develop tools for sharing experiences• regional draft standards workshops• develop and use questionnaire as per

proposal (oeWg on a possible Compliance mechanism at Kuching, 2007)

9

Strategic Areas goals Outcome and Purpose Activities

4. Coordination and communication

Coordinated phytosanitary capacity development are addressing priority needs

• collect, collate and disseminate information on plant protection programmes and existing capacity building providers and projects

• advise countries and donors on possible synergies and opportunities

• collaboration with partners (implementation and supervision agreements, initiatives, etc) – Standards and trade Development Facility (StDF) projects, World Bank missions, Centers of phytosanitary excellence (Cope), etc.

• create mechanism for matchmaking for mentoring, coaching and assistance

• define exactly what information to collect from whom (countries, donors, through linkages, all other partners)

• take advantage of existing databases, projects, oCpm meeting reports

• use linkages to make better programmes (benefit to nppos)

• continue existing agreements• actively seek further opportunities to

collaborate/provide technical input to programmes of others

• engage stakeholders by convening international consultative group on phytosanitary capacity building

• create similar format to the one used by for mentoring SpS inquiry points

5. pest information Capability to provide plant pest information enhanced

• document world plant pest status (emerging issues), including regional perspectives (annual report as an advocacy tool)

• analysis of pest occurrence at national and regional levels, report of pest concerns at Cpm.

• other official reports of the Secretariat or Fao Committee/Council such as State of Food and agriculture (SoFa)

• develop early warning system

6. Resource mobilization (Fundraising)

enhanced capacity to mobilize funds

• determine resource needs for ippC secretariat related to capacity building

• assess current resources available to ippC to deliver capacity building strategy (targeted, trust fund, slush fund, assistance in-kind)

• support nppos in raising funds for priority projects

• obtain further resources and ensure effective use of resources

• maintain and develop ippC capacity building programmes

• prepare paper on staffing requirements for CB for Cpm-4

• raise funds (see resource mobilization paper presented under Cpm-4 agenda item 13.6.6

• hire a dedicated fund raiser• Secretary takes raised profile for fundraising

7. advocacy Improved capacity to promote national phytosanitary systems

• adopt “paris principles” for phytosanitary capacity building activities (national commitment, etc)

• help countries ‘embed’ phytosanitary considerations in policy and national development strategies

• assist phytosanitary authorities to communicate effectively with other institutions within their country, with other countries and with regional organizations

• enhance visibility of ippC (and phytosanitary concerns) among development partners

• encourage adoption of risk-based approaches

• oeWg/sub group to draft principles for effective phytosanitary capacity building for approval by Cpm

• Spta reviews principles• Cpm 5 adopts principles• conduct sensitisation activities for

policy makers• develop training modules for phytosanitary

authorities in effective communication and advocacy

• ippC communication activities (publication, communication products, films, etc)

• access to governing bodies (especially Fao, but also ReCs); Fao and other goodwill ambassadors to reach senior decision makers

8. monitoring and evaluation

Capacity development actively monitored, evaluated and lessons learned acted upon

• develop approaches for impact assessment for phytosanitary capacity building (in accordance with “paris principles” and regarding ippC strategy)

• monitoring to assess impact of capacity building activities (review and evaluation)

• monitor and continuously improve ippC capacity building programmes

• develop ippC ‘seal of approval’ for capacity building programmes

• ensure involvement of all stakeholders (including creating networks for sustainability, involving universities, public-private partnerships, etc)

• link to other national initiatives• develop, test and adopt criteria for ‘seal

of approval’• promote with donors and countries


10

Table 2. Logical Framework for the IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy

Impact/goal Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk

Cooperation between nations in protecting the world’s cultivated and natural plant resources from the spread and introduction of pests of plants, while minimizing interference with the international movement of goods and people

1. Reduction of the absolute number of people suffering from hunger

2. increased food production3. Sustainable management and

utilization of natural resources

global poverty and hunger indices (World Bank, FaoStat, etc.)

global economic crisis continues diverting resources from aid to agricultural productivity in Developing countries

Outcome/Purpose Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk

NPPOs able to effectively and sustainably service the needs of their country in the protection of plants and plant products and the facilitation of trade

1. number of ippC standards implemented per country

2. phytosanitary capacity evolving in response to changing circumstances

3. number of Cps with phytosanitary issues embedded in national phytosanitary policies

1. iRSS data; Rppo reports; nppo reports

2. pCe data; nppo annual reports; Rppo reports; independent evaluation reports

3. policy review reports

global conflicts, natural disasters and compounded effects at the national level by the global economic crisis diverts funds from nppos

Outputs Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk

1. enhanced national phytosanitary systems planning, management and leadership

1. application of the pCe tool2. national strategies or action

plans approved3. # of Cps with managers trained

in management best practices4. number of emergency pest

response plans develop by Cps

1. pCe data; nppo annual reports; Rppo reports; independent evaluation reports.

2. iRSS data; Rppo reports; nppo reports

the ippC and partners can develop tools, but nppos may not be able or have local support to apply them

2. Capacity of contracting parties to participate in IPPC standard setting improved

1. number of Cps attending Cpm and key ippC meetings

2. level of feedback of Cps after meetings

1. iRSS data; Rppo reports; ReC and other partners’ reports

2. ippC meeting reports; Survey feedback reports

governments do not allocate funding to ensure participation

3. Coordinated phytosanitary capacity development are addressing priority needs

1. number coordinated global, regional and national projects implemented per year

2. number of functional coordination mechanisms reported to be implemented by Cps

3. number of inter-organizational (donors, technical assistance providers, ReCs etc.) meetings held per year addressing phytosanitary issues at global, regional or national level

4. Degree of Cp satisfaction on the assistance provided by the ippC helpdesk

1. iRSS data; ippC and partners’ reports

2. targeted survey feedback reports

3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports.

4. ippC helpdesk data.5. ippC projects database and

activities data

partners disregard the need for coordination due to other priorities or policies and continue to implement capacity building resulting in duplicated work and resources

11

Outputs Key Indicator Means of Verification Assumptions/Risk

4. Capability to provide plant pest information enhanced

1. Rate of pest reporting by Cps and Rppos through the ippC portal

2. number of functional diagnostic laboratories at regional or national levels reported by Cps or Rppos

3. Rate of change of number pest specimens hosted in national collections

4. number of pest notifications reported through pest early warning systems

1. ipp data; ippC and partners’ reports


3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports.

nppos refuse to notify pests status for fear of reprisals such as trade prohibitions or restrictions

5. enhanced capacity to mobilize funds

1. number of inter-organizational (donors, technical assistance providers, ReCs etc.) meetings held per year for resource mobilization to address phytosanitary issues at global, regional or national level

2. Degree of change over previous years of budgetary support to ippC

3. Degree of self sustainability of nppos of Cps

4. Degree of change over previous years of budgetary support to nppos



3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports

4. ippC projects database and activities data

5. partners’ financial reports

Reduction in aid for agricultural development or redirection of funds to other emerging priorities

6. Improved capacity to promote national phytosanitary systems

1. number of policies and legislation developed, updated or enforced, at regional and national levels, with phytosanitary issues embedded.

2. number of guidelines, documentation, training and other materials addressing advocacy developed and used at global, regional and national levels

3. level of participation and investments in global, regional and national trainings specific to policy makers, senior government officials and private sector stakeholders

4. number of public-private sector partnerships reported by Cps



3. pCe data; nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports

4. ippC projects database and activities data

5. partners’ financial reports

the fluid dynamics of politics (impact of national elections on the nppo and within government structures) particularly in developing countries may limit the impact of the programme in the short-term

7. Capacity development actively monitored, evaluated and lessons learned acted upon

1. Degree of uptake of m&e methods by Cps

2. number and type of reviews conducted by Cps, Rppos and other phytosanitary agencies

3. number of excellence awards provided by the ippC

4. ippC global capacity development strategy updated every 6 years

1. iRSS data; Rppo reports; ReC and other partners’ reports

2. ippC reports; Survey feedback reports

3. nppo annual reports; audit reports; independent evaluation reports.

4. ippC m&e data5. ippC projects and activities

database data

Country level data may not be shared readily for fear that such information may impact trade opportunities for some countries


12

the work plan addressing the ippC national

phytosanitary capacity development strategy

(to be used by the ippC contracting parties,

the Secretariat and other organizations) is a

comprehensive and useful document that has

been endorsed by Cpm-7in 2012, after review

by the eWg CD. after the improvements, it was

recognised that the global operational work

plan is a dynamic and theoretical activity to be

accomplished over many years.

it was also considered that this document has a

strategic and non-operational nature and it would

be useful to show to governments and donors

the investment options and priorities to reinforce

phytosanitary capacities, but not hypothetical

values of the activities.

in some areas the Secretariat has a lead role to

play, while in others, such as national phytosanitary

planning, the Secretariat can support or assist an

activity led by another stakeholder.

table 3 presents the ippC Capacity Development

Workplan organized by activity, output and

subactivity, for an estimated period of six years.

For clarity purposes, each row refers to one

subactivity and is covered by a triple code (e. g. St2/

o1/a1.1) identifying the strategic objective, output

number into that objective, activity and subactivity.

the contents of the table is very useful in terms

of setting leaderships and supporting commitments

for all activities intended to implement the ippC

national phytosanitary capacity development

strategy , suggesting funding options that could

be explored by nppos, the ippC and other

organizations and adding comments and notes on

details linked to the practical implementation of

the subactivities.

Work plan for the IPPC Strategy on Capacity Development

13


Tabl

e 3.

The

IPPC

Cap

acit

y D

evel

opm

ent

Wor

kpla

n

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

1: N

atio

nal P

S Pl

anni

ng a

nd M

anag

emen

t

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST1/

O1/

A1.1

1. F

it-fo

r-pur

pose

to

ols

and

proc

esse

s fo

r phy

tosa

nita

ry

syst

ems

(pS)

pl

anni

ng

iden

tifyi

ng a

nd re

view

too

ls fo

r pS

capa

city

eva

luat

ion

ippC

Sec

npp

o, R

ppo

ippC

Sec

, Fa

o-t

Cp,

D

onor

sD

onor

s in

clud

es b

ilate

ral,

mul

tila

tera

l, re

gion

al a

nd s

ub-r

egio

nal

fund

ed p

roje

cts

ST1/

O1/

A1.2

Dev

elop

new

or r

evis

e ex

istin

g fit

for p

urpo

se t

ools

ippC

Sec

npp

o, R

ppo

ippC

Sec

, Rpp

o, F

ao

-tC

p, D

onor

so

ther

act

ivit

ies

are

depe

nded

on

tool

s be

ing

revi

sed

or d

evel

oped

ST1/

01/A

1.3

Dev

elop

men

t of i

ppC

core

tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

ippC

npp

o, R

ppo

ippC

Sec

, Rpp

o, F

ao

-tC

p, D

onor

so

ther

act

ivit

ies

are

depe

nded

on

tool

s be

ing

revi

sed

or d

evel

oped

ST1/

O2/

A2.

12.

Crit

ical

com

pete

ncie

s av

aila

ble

in

the

natio

nal

phyt

osan

itary

sy

stem

to u

nder

take

na

tiona

l pla

nnin

g,

man

agem

ent a

nd

prov

ide

lead

ersh

ip

to th

e n

ppo

. Crit

ical

co

mpe

tenc

ies

avai

labl

e in

th

e na

tiona

l ph

ytos

anita

ry

syst

em to

und

erta

ke

natio

nal p

lann

ing,

m

anag

emen

t and

pr

ovid

e le

ader

ship

to

the

npp

o

Regi

onal

or n

atio

nal p

olic

y di

scus

sion

s in

clud

ing

plan

ning

man

agem

ent a

nd le

ader

ship

on

the

man

date

of

the

npp

o

Rppo

npp

o, i

ppC

Sec

and

othe

rsRp

po, n

atio

nal,

ippC

Se

c, F

ao

-tC

p, D

onor

s,

othe

rs

ST1/

O2/

A2.

2tr

aini

ng (p

roje

ct m

anag

emen

t, pr

opos

al w

ritin

g,

adm

inis

trat

ive

and

man

agem

ent,

lead

ersh

ip, s

taff

tr

aini

ng p

rogr

amm

e de

velo

pmen

t)

npp

oip

pC S

ec, R

ppo

, St

DF

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, Fa

o-t

Cp,

D

onor

s, o

ther

s

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

base

d on

nee

ds

and

prio

ritie

s

ST1/

O2/

A2.

3U

nder

take

bas

elin

e st

udy

on p

lann

ing

and

man

agem

ent

requ

irem

ents

in t

he n

atio

nal p

hyto

sani

tary

sys

tem

in

clud

ing

stak

ehol

der e

ngag

emen

t

npp

oRp

po, i

ppC

Sec.

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, Fa

o-t

Cp,

Don

ors

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

base

d on

nee

ds

and

prio

ritie

s

ST1/

O2/

A2.

4D

evel

op m

ento

ring

oppo

rtun

ities

to

supp

ort n

atio

nal

phyt

osan

itar

y pl

anni

ng a

nd m

anag

emen

tn

ppo

Rppo

, ipp

C Se

c,

StD

F, o

ther

sn

atio

nal,

ippC

Sec

, Rp

po, F

ao

-tC

p, D

onor

s

ST1/

O3/

A3.

13.

Bes

t pra

ctic

e fo

r nat

iona

l ph

ytos

anita

ry a

ctio

n pl

ans

deve

lope

d

Dev

elop

nat

iona

l phy

tosa

nita

ry a

ctio

n pl

ans

and

hR

plan

s an

d su

cces

sion

pla

nnin

gn

ppo

Rppo

, oth

ers,

ip

pC S

ec.

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, Fa

o-t

Cp,

Don

ors

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

base

d on

nee

ds

and

prio

ritie

s

ST1/

O3/

A3.

2D

evel

op n

atio

nal e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se p

lans

for

regu

late

d pe

sts

that

inco

rpor

ate

regi

onal

em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

pla

ns, w

here

the

y ex

ist

npp

oRp

po, o

ther

s,

ippC

Sec

.n

atio

nal,

ippC

Sec

, Rp

po, F

ao

-tC

p, D

onor

sn

atio

nal a

ctiv

itie

s ba

sed

on n

eeds

an

d pr

iorit

ies

14

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

2: P

artic

ipat

ion

in S

tand

ard

Sett

ing

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST2/

O1/

A1.1

1. e

nhan

ced

regi

onal

co

ordi

natio

n of

inpu

ts

into

the

sta

ndar

d se

ttin

g pr

oces

s

Rppo

coo

rdin

ate

disc

ussi

on fo

r a/

wor

ksho

ps o

n dr

aft s

tand

ards

, new

top

ics,

spe

cific

atio

ns a

nd C

pm

prep

arat

ion

Rppo

ippC

Sec

, ReC

s, o

ther

inte

grat

ion

orga

niza

tions

Fao

, Don

ors,

ippC

Sec

ST2/

O1/

A1.2

trai

ning

Rpp

os

staf

f and

regi

onal

exp

erts

on

part

icip

atio

n in

all

stag

es o

f the

sta

ndar

d se

ttin

g pr

oces

s (e

.g. t

opic

s, s

peci

ficat

ions

, rep

rese

ntat

ion

on

the

SC a

nd in

oth

er t

echn

ical

bod

es, d

raft

sta

ndar

ds)

ippC

Sec

Rppo

s, e

xper

tsip

pC S

ec, F

ao

, Don

ors,

Rp

pos

ST2/

O1/

A1.3

trai

ning

Rpp

os

staf

f and

regi

onal

exp

erts

to

faci

litat

e/co

ordi

nate

sta

ndar

d se

ttin

g m

eetin

gsip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

exp

erts

, Rp

pos

ippC

Sec

, Fa

o, D

onor

s,

Rppo

sli

nked

to b

udge

ted

wor

ksho

ps th

at th

e ip

pC

hold

s. th

is ex

pend

iture

repr

esen

ts a

n ad

ditio

nal

days

cos

t to

the

norm

al 5

day

mee

ting

ST2/

O2/

A2.

12.

enh

ance

d in

volv

emen

t of

sta

keho

lder

s at

na

tiona

l lev

el

hol

d m

ulti

-sta

keho

lder

dis

cuss

ion,

fora

, tra

inin

g,

wor

ksho

ps, w

eb o

n dr

aft i

Spm

s, n

ew t

opic

s,

spec

ifica

tions

, Cpm

, etc

npp

oRp

pos,

eCs

oth

er

orga

niza

tions

, ip

pC S

ec, F

ao

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

ST2/

O3/

A3.

13.

Qua

lity

of c

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s pa

rtic

ipat

ion

impr

oved

hol

d or

ient

atio

n pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r new

Cpm

del

egat

esip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

Fa

oD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

ca

mee

ting

of a

few

hou

rs p

rior t

o st

art o

f th

e Cp

m

ST2/

O3/

A3.

2pe

er/c

oach

ing/

men

torin

g fo

r new

mem

bers

of

sub

sidi

ary

bodi

es o

f th

e ip

pC

ippC

Sec

Rppo

s, F

ao

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

a m

eetin

g of

a fe

w h

ours

prio

r to

star

t of

the

Subs

idia

ry B

ody'

s m

eetin

g (e

.g. B

urea

u,

Spta

, eW

g, t

ps, S

C et

c.)

ST2/

O3/

A3.

3Su

ppor

t X p

artic

ipat

ion

in e

Wg

s an

d te

chni

cal p

anel

s (m

ax 2

tec

hnic

al s

tand

ards

per

yea

r)ip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

npp

os

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

onl

y do

ne fo

r tec

hnic

al s

tand

ards

for

whi

ch t

he m

embe

rs o

f an

eWg

or t

p ne

ed

a gl

obal

vie

w o

f the

top

ic a

t han

d

ST2/

O3/

A3.

4C

ondu

ct in

dep

th d

iscu

ssio

n w

ith a

ll st

akeh

olde

rs, o

n dr

aft i

Spm

sn

ppo

Rppo

sD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

c

Revi

ew o

f dra

ft s

tand

ards

at n

atio

nal l

evel

npp

oRp

po, R

eCs a

nd

othe

r org

aniza

tions

Revi

ew o

f dra

ft s

tand

ards

at r

egio

nal l

evel

Rppo

npp

o

ST2/

O3/

A3.

5en

gage

gov

ernm

ent t

o co

mit

the

hum

an a

nd fi

nanc

ial r

esou

rces

fo

r the

npp

o to

par

ticip

ate

in th

e st

anda

rd s

ettin

g pr

oces

s an

d fo

rmal

ize

its c

omm

itmen

ts u

sing

rele

vant

inst

rum

ents

npp

oRp

po, R

eCs

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

this

act

ivit

y ca

n be

com

bine

d w

ith

othe

r w

orks

hops

or c

ondu

cted

inde

pend

entl

y

ST2/

O3/

A3.

6m

onit

orin

g an

d ev

alua

tion

Cpm

npp

os,

Rpp

os,

ip

pC S

ec, D

onor

sD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

c

ann

ual r

epor

ts

mid

term

revi

ew

exte

rnal

eva

luat

ion

15

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

2: P

artic

ipat

ion

in S

tand

ard

Sett

ing

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST2/

O1/

A1.1

1. e

nhan

ced

regi

onal

co

ordi

natio

n of

inpu

ts

into

the

sta

ndar

d se

ttin

g pr

oces

s

Rppo

coo

rdin

ate

disc

ussi

on fo

r a/

wor

ksho

ps o

n dr

aft s

tand

ards

, new

top

ics,

spe

cific

atio

ns a

nd C

pm

prep

arat

ion

Rppo

ippC

Sec

, ReC

s, o

ther

inte

grat

ion

orga

niza

tions

Fao

, Don

ors,

ippC

Sec

ST2/

O1/

A1.2

trai

ning

Rpp

os

staf

f and

regi

onal

exp

erts

on

part

icip

atio

n in

all

stag

es o

f the

sta

ndar

d se

ttin

g pr

oces

s (e

.g. t

opic

s, s

peci

ficat

ions

, rep

rese

ntat

ion

on

the

SC a

nd in

oth

er t

echn

ical

bod

es, d

raft

sta

ndar

ds)

ippC

Sec

Rppo

s, e

xper

tsip

pC S

ec, F

ao

, Don

ors,

Rp

pos

ST2/

O1/

A1.3

trai

ning

Rpp

os

staf

f and

regi

onal

exp

erts

to

faci

litat

e/co

ordi

nate

sta

ndar

d se

ttin

g m

eetin

gsip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

exp

erts

, Rp

pos

ippC

Sec

, Fa

o, D

onor

s,

Rppo

sli

nked

to b

udge

ted

wor

ksho

ps th

at th

e ip

pC

hold

s. th

is ex

pend

iture

repr

esen

ts a

n ad

ditio

nal

days

cos

t to

the

norm

al 5

day

mee

ting

ST2/

O2/

A2.

12.

enh

ance

d in

volv

emen

t of

sta

keho

lder

s at

na

tiona

l lev

el

hol

d m

ulti

-sta

keho

lder

dis

cuss

ion,

fora

, tra

inin

g,

wor

ksho

ps, w

eb o

n dr

aft i

Spm

s, n

ew t

opic

s,

spec

ifica

tions

, Cpm

, etc

npp

oRp

pos,

eCs

oth

er

orga

niza

tions

, ip

pC S

ec, F

ao

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

ST2/

O3/

A3.

13.

Qua

lity

of c

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s pa

rtic

ipat

ion

impr

oved

hol

d or

ient

atio

n pr

ogra

mm

e fo

r new

Cpm

del

egat

esip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

Fa

oD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

ca

mee

ting

of a

few

hou

rs p

rior t

o st

art o

f th

e Cp

m

ST2/

O3/

A3.

2pe

er/c

oach

ing/

men

torin

g fo

r new

mem

bers

of

sub

sidi

ary

bodi

es o

f th

e ip

pC

ippC

Sec

Rppo

s, F

ao

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

a m

eetin

g of

a fe

w h

ours

prio

r to

star

t of

the

Subs

idia

ry B

ody'

s m

eetin

g (e

.g. B

urea

u,

Spta

, eW

g, t

ps, S

C et

c.)

ST2/

O3/

A3.

3Su

ppor

t X p

artic

ipat

ion

in e

Wg

s an

d te

chni

cal p

anel

s (m

ax 2

tec

hnic

al s

tand

ards

per

yea

r)ip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

npp

os

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

onl

y do

ne fo

r tec

hnic

al s

tand

ards

for

whi

ch t

he m

embe

rs o

f an

eWg

or t

p ne

ed

a gl

obal

vie

w o

f the

top

ic a

t han

d

ST2/

O3/

A3.

4C

ondu

ct in

dep

th d

iscu

ssio

n w

ith a

ll st

akeh

olde

rs, o

n dr

aft i

Spm

sn

ppo

Rppo

sD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

c

Revi

ew o

f dra

ft s

tand

ards

at n

atio

nal l

evel

npp

oRp

po, R

eCs a

nd

othe

r org

aniza

tions

Revi

ew o

f dra

ft s

tand

ards

at r

egio

nal l

evel

Rppo

npp

o

ST2/

O3/

A3.

5en

gage

gov

ernm

ent t

o co

mit

the

hum

an a

nd fi

nanc

ial r

esou

rces

fo

r the

npp

o to

par

ticip

ate

in th

e st

anda

rd s

ettin

g pr

oces

s an

d fo

rmal

ize

its c

omm

itmen

ts u

sing

rele

vant

inst

rum

ents

npp

oRp

po, R

eCs

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

this

act

ivit

y ca

n be

com

bine

d w

ith

othe

r w

orks

hops

or c

ondu

cted

inde

pend

entl

y

ST2/

O3/

A3.

6m

onit

orin

g an

d ev

alua

tion

Cpm

npp

os,

Rpp

os,

ip

pC S

ec, D

onor

sD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

c

ann

ual r

epor

ts

mid

term

revi

ew

exte

rnal

eva

luat

ion

Stra

tegi

c A

reas

3: S

tand

ards

Impl

emen

tatio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST3/

01/A

1en

hanc

ed in

volv

emen

t of

sta

keho

lder

s at

na

tiona

l lev

el

iden

tifyi

ng im

plem

enta

tion

issu

es a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith

adop

ted

and

draf

t sta

ndar

ds (a

ppro

x 5

per y

ear)

.n

ppo

Rppo

s,

ReC

s o

ther

or

gani

zatio

ns,

ippC

Sec

, Fa

o

Don

ors,

npp

o, R

ppo

, Fa

o, i

ppC

Sec

acc

ompa

nyin

g dr

aft i

mpl

emen

tatio

n gu

idel

ines

with

dr

aft s

tand

ards

(app

rox

5 pe

r yea

r).

a. p

repa

re g

uide

line

B. C

ircul

ate

/rev

iew

gui

delin

eC

. Dis

trib

ute

guid

elin

e at

regi

onal

wor

ksho

ps

ippC

Sec

/ex

pert

expe

rts,

Rpp

os,

n

ppo

sD

onor

s, n

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

, ipp

C Se

cim

plem

enta

tion

requ

irem

ents

gui

delin

e pr

epar

ed t

hat g

oes

out w

ith

each

dra

ft

stan

dard

sen

t for

cou

ntry

con

sult

atio

n.

ST3/

O2/

A2

impr

oved

un

ders

tand

ing

of

impl

emen

tatio

n re

quire

men

ts o

f sp

ecifi

c st

anda

rds

Dev

elop

man

uals

; gui

delin

es; f

acts

heet

s; c

apac

ity

need

s as

sess

men

t to

ols

for i

mpl

emen

ting

sp

ecifi

c st

anda

rds

impl

emen

tati

on o

f 34

stan

dard

s @

201

1

Dev

elop

men

t of n

ew to

ols

for i

mpl

emen

tatio

n

ST3/

O2/

A2.

1Su

ppor

t pro

vide

d fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of

prio

rity

iSpm

s

trai

ning

on

impl

emen

tatio

n of

iSpm

s

nat

iona

l lev

el

impl

emen

tatio

n of

34

stan

dard

s @

201

1ex

pert

s,

npp

oRp

po

Regi

onal

leve

lRp

po/

expe

rts

ippC

Sec

Wor

ksho

ps

hig

her l

evel

edu

catio

nRp

poip

pC S

ec, n

ppo

esta

blis

hmen

t of c

ente

rs o

f exc

elle

nce

esta

blis

hmen

t of m

ento

ring

syst

em fo

r cou

ntrie

s

to h

elp

each

oth

erRp

poRe

Cs a

nd o

ther

or

gani

zatio

ns,

ippC

Sec

, npp

os

ST3/

O2/

A2.

2m

obili

ze re

sour

ces

for i

mpl

emen

tatio

n

of s

tand

ards

npp

on

ppo

s, R

ppo

s,

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions


16

Stra

tegi

c A

reas

3: S

tand

ards

Impl

emen

tatio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST3/

O2/

A2.

3D

evel

op a

dvoc

acy

mat

eria

lsip

pC S

ec/

Fao

Rppo

s, Re

Cs

and

ot

her o

rgan

iza-

tions

, Spt

a

npp

os,

Don

ors,

StD

F, Rp

pos,

ReC

S a

nd o

ther

or

gani

zatio

ns, i

ppC

Sec

Con

tinuo

us p

rogr

amm

e an

d dr

aws

on a

ll as

pect

s re

late

d in

the

CD

str

ateg

y

adv

ocat

e an

d Co

mm

unic

ate

npp

o

Dev

elop

com

mun

icat

ion

mat

eria

lsip

pC S

ec/

Fao

Rppo

s, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns,

Spta

Dev

elop

pla

nnin

g to

ols

for s

peci

fic iS

pms

id

entifi

ed b

y th

e n

ppo

sip

pC S

ec/

Fao

Rppo

s, R

eCS

and

ot

her

orga

niza

tions

Dev

elop

reso

urce

pla

nn

ppo

Rppo

s, Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns,

Spta

Staf

fing

npp

o

dono

r mat

chin

gip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

ReCS

an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

men

torin

g (s

ee a

ctiv

ity 2

.2)

npp

oRp

pos,

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, ip

pC S

ec

impl

emen

t iRS

S pr

ogra

mm

eip

pC S

ecRp

po, n

ppo

, Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Stra

tegi

c A

reas

4: C

omm

unic

atio

n an

d Co

ordi

natio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST4/

O1/

A1in

form

atio

n an

d re

sour

ces

of

inte

rnat

iona

l, re

gion

al

and

natio

nal b

odie

s id

entifi

ed, m

anag

ed

and

coor

dina

ted

esta

blis

h ba

selin

eip

pC a

nd

Rppo

sn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

ST4/

O1/

A1.1

Build

iCt

syst

em a

cces

sibl

e to

don

ors

and

reci

pien

ts

with

lim

ited

gen

eral

acc

ess

ippC

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

s

ST4/

O1/

A1.2

Dev

elop

and

con

duct

per

iodi

c su

rvey

of c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

rogr

ams

to p

opul

ate

the

syst

emip

pCn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

ST4/

O1/

A1.3

trai

n us

ers

on s

yste

m o

pera

tions

.ip

pCn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St4/

o2/

a2.

1m

etho

ds a

nd p

athw

ays

for c

omm

unic

atio

n us

ed

esta

blis

h “h

elp

desk

” w

hich

is e

mpo

wer

ed t

o fa

cilit

ate

and

mai

ntai

n pa

rtne

ring

betw

een

dono

rs a

nd re

cipi

ents

ippC

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

sC

alcu

late

d in

the

iRSS

pro

gram

St4/

o2/

a2.

2ea

ch s

ucce

ssiv

e Cp

m e

ncou

rage

s th

e us

e of

hel

p de

skC

pmn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St4/

o3/

a3.

2m

echa

nism

and

sy

nerg

ies

for

coor

dina

tion

used

Con

trac

ting

part

ies

or R

ppo

s re

port

s in

form

atio

n to

ip

pC o

n on

goin

g or

pla

nned

pro

ject

s in

mem

ber n

atio

nsRp

pon

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St4/

o4/

a4.

1C

ompe

tenc

ies

for

reso

urce

mob

iliza

tion

and

man

agem

ent

iden

tified

and

su

ppor

ted

thro

ugh

the

natio

nal p

hyto

sani

tary

ac

tion

plan

nat

iona

l net

wor

king

mec

hani

sm e

stab

lishe

dn

ppo

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

sin

itia

l dev

elop

men

t ac

tivi

ty m

ay

requ

ire ip

pC in

terv

enti

on f

or p

rovi

ding

de

scrip

tion

of w

hat

is r

equi

red

- re

gion

al t

rave

l

St4/

o4/

a4.

2n

atio

nal c

oord

inat

ion

com

mit

tee

(SpS

/bi

osec

urit

y/tr

ade

faci

litat

ion,

etc

) est

ablis

hed

to e

ngag

e ot

her

min

istr

ies/

depa

rtm

ents

in c

oope

rati

ve a

ctiv

ities

tha

t ca

n be

nefit

pla

nt h

ealth

eff

orts

npp

on

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

init

ial d

evel

opm

ent a

ctiv

ity

may

requ

ire

ippC

inte

rven

tion

for p

rovi

ding

des

crip

tion

of w

hat i

s re

quire

d - r

egio

nal t

rave

l

St4/

o4/

a5.

1D

evel

op li

nkag

es b

etw

een

and

amon

g ot

her r

egio

nal

and

othe

r mul

tinat

iona

l org

aniz

atio

nsip

pC/

Rppo

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

sFi

ve d

onor

con

fere

nces

hel

d on

a re

gion

al

basi

s at

an

aver

age

cost

of $

75,0

00

17


Stra

tegi

c A

reas

3: S

tand

ards

Impl

emen

tatio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST3/

O2/

A2.

3D

evel

op a

dvoc

acy

mat

eria

lsip

pC S

ec/

Fao

Rppo

s, Re

Cs

and

ot

her o

rgan

iza-

tions

, Spt

a

npp

os,

Don

ors,

StD

F, Rp

pos,

ReC

S a

nd o

ther

or

gani

zatio

ns, i

ppC

Sec

Con

tinuo

us p

rogr

amm

e an

d dr

aws

on a

ll as

pect

s re

late

d in

the

CD

str

ateg

y

adv

ocat

e an

d Co

mm

unic

ate

npp

o

Dev

elop

com

mun

icat

ion

mat

eria

lsip

pC S

ec/

Fao

Rppo

s, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns,

Spta

Dev

elop

pla

nnin

g to

ols

for s

peci

fic iS

pms

id

entifi

ed b

y th

e n

ppo

sip

pC S

ec/

Fao

Rppo

s, R

eCS

and

ot

her

orga

niza

tions

Dev

elop

reso

urce

pla

nn

ppo

Rppo

s, Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns,

Spta

Staf

fing

npp

o

dono

r mat

chin

gip

pC S

ecRp

pos,

ReCS

an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

men

torin

g (s

ee a

ctiv

ity 2

.2)

npp

oRp

pos,

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, ip

pC S

ec

impl

emen

t iRS

S pr

ogra

mm

eip

pC S

ecRp

po, n

ppo

, Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Stra

tegi

c A

reas

4: C

omm

unic

atio

n an

d Co

ordi

natio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

ST4/

O1/

A1in

form

atio

n an

d re

sour

ces

of

inte

rnat

iona

l, re

gion

al

and

natio

nal b

odie

s id

entifi

ed, m

anag

ed

and

coor

dina

ted

esta

blis

h ba

selin

eip

pC a

nd

Rppo

sn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

ST4/

O1/

A1.1

Build

iCt

syst

em a

cces

sibl

e to

don

ors

and

reci

pien

ts

with

lim

ited

gen

eral

acc

ess

ippC

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

s

ST4/

O1/

A1.2

Dev

elop

and

con

duct

per

iodi

c su

rvey

of c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

rogr

ams

to p

opul

ate

the

syst

emip

pCn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

ST4/

O1/

A1.3

trai

n us

ers

on s

yste

m o

pera

tions

.ip

pCn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St4/

o2/

a2.

1m

etho

ds a

nd p

athw

ays

for c

omm

unic

atio

n us

ed

esta

blis

h “h

elp

desk

” w

hich

is e

mpo

wer

ed t

o fa

cilit

ate

and

mai

ntai

n pa

rtne

ring

betw

een

dono

rs a

nd re

cipi

ents

ippC

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

sC

alcu

late

d in

the

iRSS

pro

gram

St4/

o2/

a2.

2ea

ch s

ucce

ssiv

e Cp

m e

ncou

rage

s th

e us

e of

hel

p de

skC

pmn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St4/

o3/

a3.

2m

echa

nism

and

sy

nerg

ies

for

coor

dina

tion

used

Con

trac

ting

part

ies

or R

ppo

s re

port

s in

form

atio

n to

ip

pC o

n on

goin

g or

pla

nned

pro

ject

s in

mem

ber n

atio

nsRp

pon

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St4/

o4/

a4.

1C

ompe

tenc

ies

for

reso

urce

mob

iliza

tion

and

man

agem

ent

iden

tified

and

su

ppor

ted

thro

ugh

the

natio

nal p

hyto

sani

tary

ac

tion

plan

nat

iona

l net

wor

king

mec

hani

sm e

stab

lishe

dn

ppo

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

sin

itia

l dev

elop

men

t ac

tivi

ty m

ay

requ

ire ip

pC in

terv

enti

on f

or p

rovi

ding

de

scrip

tion

of w

hat

is r

equi

red

- re

gion

al t

rave

l

St4/

o4/

a4.

2n

atio

nal c

oord

inat

ion

com

mit

tee

(SpS

/bi

osec

urit

y/tr

ade

faci

litat

ion,

etc

) est

ablis

hed

to e

ngag

e ot

her

min

istr

ies/

depa

rtm

ents

in c

oope

rati

ve a

ctiv

ities

tha

t ca

n be

nefit

pla

nt h

ealth

eff

orts

npp

on

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

init

ial d

evel

opm

ent a

ctiv

ity

may

requ

ire

ippC

inte

rven

tion

for p

rovi

ding

des

crip

tion

of w

hat i

s re

quire

d - r

egio

nal t

rave

l

St4/

o4/

a5.

1D

evel

op li

nkag

es b

etw

een

and

amon

g ot

her r

egio

nal

and

othe

r mul

tinat

iona

l org

aniz

atio

nsip

pC/

Rppo

npp

os

and

Rppo

sD

onor

sFi

ve d

onor

con

fere

nces

hel

d on

a re

gion

al

basi

s at

an

aver

age

cost

of $

75,0

00

18

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

5: P

est I

nfor

mat

ion

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St5/

o1/

a1C

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s up

date

d re

gula

ted

pest

lis

ts a

nd t

imel

y re

port

ou

tbre

aks

of re

gula

ted

pest

s

gap

ana

lysi

s to

det

erm

ine

requ

irem

ents

for

surv

eilla

nce,

dia

gnos

tics,

refe

renc

e co

llect

ions

, in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s et

c.

ippC

ippC

/Rp

po/

npp

o a

nd o

ther

or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors

St5/

o2/

a2

pest

dat

a an

alys

ed,

espe

cial

ly p

rovi

ding

ea

rly w

arni

ng fo

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t, m

arke

t ac

cess

and

risk

ana

lysi

s

nat

iona

l pla

nnin

g ac

tivi

ties

rela

ted

to s

urve

illan

ce,

diag

nost

ics

and

rela

ted

acti

vitie

s un

derp

inni

ng

food

sec

urit

y

npp

os

ippC

/Rp

po/

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors

this

is a

com

pone

nt fr

eque

ntly

inte

grat

ed

into

man

y co

oper

atio

n pr

ojec

ts

St5/

o/a

3.1

enha

ncem

ent o

f sur

veill

ance

ski

lls t

hrou

gh t

rain

ing

- es

peci

ally

pra

ctic

al a

pplic

atio

nn

ppo

Rppo

s, ip

pC

Sec,

tec

hnic

al

ass

ista

nce

prov

ider

s

Don

ors

ass

umin

g 80

cou

ntrie

s re

ceiv

ing

400.

000

each

ove

r 2 y

ears

.

St5/

o/a

3.2

Dev

elop

men

t of s

peci

aliz

ed d

iagn

ostic

sup

port

at a

re

gion

al le

vel

Rppo

npp

o/

ippC

Don

ors

Refle

cted

as

ongo

ing

over

the

life

of t

he

proj

ect.

St5/

o/a

4.1

enha

ncem

ent o

f dia

gnos

tic c

apab

ility

thr

ough

de

velo

pmen

t of l

abor

ator

y in

fras

truc

ture

npp

on

ppo

/Rp

po/

ippC

Don

ors

nee

ds d

eter

min

ed b

ased

on

gap

anal

ysis

an

d m

idte

rm re

view

. a

ssum

ing

80 c

ount

ries

rece

ivin

g 50

0.00

0

St5/

o/a

4.2

enha

ncem

ent o

f dia

gnos

tic c

apab

ility

thr

ough

the

pr

ovis

ion

of d

iagn

ostic

too

lsn

ppo

/Rp

po/

ippC

Don

ors

this

will

incl

ude

taxo

nom

ic re

fere

nce

mat

eria

l, el

ectr

onic

or o

ther

wis

e.

St5/

o/a

4.3

enha

ncem

ent o

f dia

gnos

tic c

apab

ility

thr

ough

de

velo

pmen

t of n

etw

orki

ngip

pCRp

po/

npp

oD

onor

svi

sion

is t

o es

tabl

ish

a ne

twor

k, re

gist

ers

of e

xper

tise,

etc

.

St5/

o/a

4.4

enha

ncem

ent o

f ref

eren

ce c

olle

ctio

ns a

nd re

late

d ph

ysic

al fa

cilit

ies

and

cura

tion

prot

ocol

sn

ppo

Rppo

/ip

pCD

onor

sD

riven

by

gap

anal

ysis

, and

revi

site

d pe

riodi

cally

St5/

o/a

4.5

Con

firm

ator

y id

entifi

catio

ns fo

r spe

cim

ens

to a

ssis

t w

ith re

fere

nce

colle

ctio

ns, e

arly

war

ning

for r

isk

man

agem

ent,

mar

ket a

cces

s an

d ris

k an

alys

is

npp

oRp

po, i

ppC

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

5.1

Crea

te a

nd d

eplo

y in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s at n

atio

nal l

evel

. m

echa

nism

s cre

ated

to p

rovi

de p

est i

nfor

mat

ion

to n

ppo

sn

ppo

ippC

/Rp

poD

onor

s

St5/

o/a

5.2

trai

ning

in c

ompi

latio

n of

pes

t inf

orm

atio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of i

nfor

mat

ion

syst

ems

prov

ided

to

natio

nal a

ctor

s, in

clud

ing

npp

os

npp

oip

pC/

Rppo

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

5.3.

Dat

a en

try

npp

os

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

6.1

Cap

abili

ty t

o pr

ovid

e pl

ant p

est i

nfor

mat

ion

enha

nced

.

trai

ning

pro

vide

d in

ana

lysi

s of

pes

t inf

orm

atio

n,

prep

arat

ion

of p

est r

epor

ts a

nd is

suin

g of

pes

t ale

rtn

ppo

/

Rppo

ippC

Don

ors

Dep

ende

nt o

n co

mpl

exit

y of

tas

ks t

o be

do

ne

St5/

o1/

a7

pest

info

rmat

ion

anal

yzed

; rep

orts

and

ear

ly w

arni

ngs i

ssue

dn

ppo

sip

pC/

Rppo

/n

ppo

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

8em

bed

ippC

rela

ted

mat

eria

l in

natio

nal t

ertia

ry a

nd

voca

tiona

l cur

ricul

an

ppo

sip

pC/

Rppo

Don

ors

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

6: R

esou

rce

Mob

ilaza

tion

(Fun

drai

sing

)

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St6/

o1/a

1.1

enha

nced

cap

acit

y to

en

gage

don

ors

at a

ll le

vels

Don

or c

oord

inat

ion

mee

tings

at a

ll le

vels

ippC

Sec

npp

o, R

ppo

ippC

Sec

, Don

ors

St6/

o1/a

1.2

Coo

rdin

ate

and

max

imiz

e th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of t

he fu

nds

avai

labl

e fr

om v

ario

us s

ourc

es.

StD

F, ip

pC

Sec

npp

o, R

ppo

, Re

C’s,

Don

ors

ippC

Sec

, Rpp

o, t

rust

Fu

nds,

Don

ors

St6/

o1/a

1.3

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es t

o be

use

d by

npp

os

for e

ngag

ing

dono

rsip

pC S

ecn

ppo

, Rpp

oip

pC S

ec, R

ppo

, Don

ors

St6/

o1/

a1.4

Dev

elop

reco

mm

enda

tions

to

be u

sed

by d

onor

s fo

r gr

antin

g fu

ndin

g su

ppor

tip

pC S

ecn

ppo

, Rpp

on

atio

nal,

ippC

Sec

, Rp

po, D

onor

s

St6/

o1/

a1.5

hire

a fu

ll-tim

e fu

ndra

iser

in t

he ip

pC S

ecre

taria

tip

pC S

ecn

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

and

oth

ers

trus

t Fun

ds, i

ppC

Sec,

D

onor

sSt

aff r

esou

rce

shar

ed w

ith

othe

r are

as

of th

e ip

pC

St6/

o2/

a1.6

trai

n us

ers

on s

yste

m o

pera

tions

.ip

pC S

ecn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St6/

o2/

a2.

1en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

to ra

ise

fund

s fr

om

natio

nal s

ourc

es.

Und

erta

ke n

atio

nal b

asel

ine

anal

ysis

and

det

erm

ine

leve

l of f

unds

requ

ired.

npp

oip

pC S

ec, R

ppo

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, Fa

o-t

Cp,

Don

ors

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

will

be

base

d on

nee

d an

d co

st is

con

side

red

unde

r St1

St6/

o2/

a2.

2D

evel

op a

mec

hani

sm t

o en

sure

sus

tain

abili

ty o

f the

op

erat

ions

of a

n n

ppo

, inc

ludi

ng c

ost s

harin

g /c

ost-

reco

very

/use

r-pay

mod

els

npp

oip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, nat

iona

l st

akeh

olde

rs

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, nat

iona

l end

-us

er o

f pS

serv

ices

, D

onor

s

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

will

be

base

d on

nee

d an

d pr

iorit

y an

d co

st is

con

side

red

unde

r St

1

St6/

o2/

a2.

3n

ppo

man

agem

ent d

evel

ops

and

purs

ues

appr

opria

te

fund

ing

leve

l thr

ough

the

nat

iona

l bud

geta

ry p

roce

sses

npp

on

atio

nal

stak

ehol

ders

ippC

Sec

, Rpp

o,

nat

iona

l end

-use

r of p

S se

rvic

es, D

onor

s

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

will

be

base

d on

nee

d an

d co

st is

con

side

red

unde

r St1

19


Stra

tegi

c A

rea

5: P

est I

nfor

mat

ion

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St5/

o1/

a1C

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s up

date

d re

gula

ted

pest

lis

ts a

nd t

imel

y re

port

ou

tbre

aks

of re

gula

ted

pest

s

gap

ana

lysi

s to

det

erm

ine

requ

irem

ents

for

surv

eilla

nce,

dia

gnos

tics,

refe

renc

e co

llect

ions

, in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s et

c.

ippC

ippC

/Rp

po/

npp

o a

nd o

ther

or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors

St5/

o2/

a2

pest

dat

a an

alys

ed,

espe

cial

ly p

rovi

ding

ea

rly w

arni

ng fo

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t, m

arke

t ac

cess

and

risk

ana

lysi

s

nat

iona

l pla

nnin

g ac

tivi

ties

rela

ted

to s

urve

illan

ce,

diag

nost

ics

and

rela

ted

acti

vitie

s un

derp

inni

ng

food

sec

urit

y

npp

os

ippC

/Rp

po/

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors

this

is a

com

pone

nt fr

eque

ntly

inte

grat

ed

into

man

y co

oper

atio

n pr

ojec

ts

St5/

o/a

3.1

enha

ncem

ent o

f sur

veill

ance

ski

lls t

hrou

gh t

rain

ing

- es

peci

ally

pra

ctic

al a

pplic

atio

nn

ppo

Rppo

s, ip

pC

Sec,

tec

hnic

al

ass

ista

nce

prov

ider

s

Don

ors

ass

umin

g 80

cou

ntrie

s re

ceiv

ing

400.

000

each

ove

r 2 y

ears

.

St5/

o/a

3.2

Dev

elop

men

t of s

peci

aliz

ed d

iagn

ostic

sup

port

at a

re

gion

al le

vel

Rppo

npp

o/

ippC

Don

ors

Refle

cted

as

ongo

ing

over

the

life

of t

he

proj

ect.

St5/

o/a

4.1

enha

ncem

ent o

f dia

gnos

tic c

apab

ility

thr

ough

de

velo

pmen

t of l

abor

ator

y in

fras

truc

ture

npp

on

ppo

/Rp

po/

ippC

Don

ors

nee

ds d

eter

min

ed b

ased

on

gap

anal

ysis

an

d m

idte

rm re

view

. a

ssum

ing

80 c

ount

ries

rece

ivin

g 50

0.00

0

St5/

o/a

4.2

enha

ncem

ent o

f dia

gnos

tic c

apab

ility

thr

ough

the

pr

ovis

ion

of d

iagn

ostic

too

lsn

ppo

/Rp

po/

ippC

Don

ors

this

will

incl

ude

taxo

nom

ic re

fere

nce

mat

eria

l, el

ectr

onic

or o

ther

wis

e.

St5/

o/a

4.3

enha

ncem

ent o

f dia

gnos

tic c

apab

ility

thr

ough

de

velo

pmen

t of n

etw

orki

ngip

pCRp

po/

npp

oD

onor

svi

sion

is t

o es

tabl

ish

a ne

twor

k, re

gist

ers

of e

xper

tise,

etc

.

St5/

o/a

4.4

enha

ncem

ent o

f ref

eren

ce c

olle

ctio

ns a

nd re

late

d ph

ysic

al fa

cilit

ies

and

cura

tion

prot

ocol

sn

ppo

Rppo

/ip

pCD

onor

sD

riven

by

gap

anal

ysis

, and

revi

site

d pe

riodi

cally

St5/

o/a

4.5

Con

firm

ator

y id

entifi

catio

ns fo

r spe

cim

ens

to a

ssis

t w

ith re

fere

nce

colle

ctio

ns, e

arly

war

ning

for r

isk

man

agem

ent,

mar

ket a

cces

s an

d ris

k an

alys

is

npp

oRp

po, i

ppC

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

5.1

Crea

te a

nd d

eplo

y in

form

atio

n sy

stem

s at n

atio

nal l

evel

. m

echa

nism

s cre

ated

to p

rovi

de p

est i

nfor

mat

ion

to n

ppo

sn

ppo

ippC

/Rp

poD

onor

s

St5/

o/a

5.2

trai

ning

in c

ompi

latio

n of

pes

t inf

orm

atio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of i

nfor

mat

ion

syst

ems

prov

ided

to

natio

nal a

ctor

s, in

clud

ing

npp

os

npp

oip

pC/

Rppo

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

5.3.

Dat

a en

try

npp

os

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

6.1

Cap

abili

ty t

o pr

ovid

e pl

ant p

est i

nfor

mat

ion

enha

nced

.

trai

ning

pro

vide

d in

ana

lysi

s of

pes

t inf

orm

atio

n,

prep

arat

ion

of p

est r

epor

ts a

nd is

suin

g of

pes

t ale

rtn

ppo

/

Rppo

ippC

Don

ors

Dep

ende

nt o

n co

mpl

exit

y of

tas

ks t

o be

do

ne

St5/

o1/

a7

pest

info

rmat

ion

anal

yzed

; rep

orts

and

ear

ly w

arni

ngs i

ssue

dn

ppo

sip

pC/

Rppo

/n

ppo

Don

ors

St5/

o/a

8em

bed

ippC

rela

ted

mat

eria

l in

natio

nal t

ertia

ry a

nd

voca

tiona

l cur

ricul

an

ppo

sip

pC/

Rppo

Don

ors

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

6: R

esou

rce

Mob

ilaza

tion

(Fun

drai

sing

)

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St6/

o1/a

1.1

enha

nced

cap

acit

y to

en

gage

don

ors

at a

ll le

vels

Don

or c

oord

inat

ion

mee

tings

at a

ll le

vels

ippC

Sec

npp

o, R

ppo

ippC

Sec

, Don

ors

St6/

o1/a

1.2

Coo

rdin

ate

and

max

imiz

e th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of t

he fu

nds

avai

labl

e fr

om v

ario

us s

ourc

es.

StD

F, ip

pC

Sec

npp

o, R

ppo

, Re

C’s,

Don

ors

ippC

Sec

, Rpp

o, t

rust

Fu

nds,

Don

ors

St6/

o1/a

1.3

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es t

o be

use

d by

npp

os

for e

ngag

ing

dono

rsip

pC S

ecn

ppo

, Rpp

oip

pC S

ec, R

ppo

, Don

ors

St6/

o1/

a1.4

Dev

elop

reco

mm

enda

tions

to

be u

sed

by d

onor

s fo

r gr

antin

g fu

ndin

g su

ppor

tip

pC S

ecn

ppo

, Rpp

on

atio

nal,

ippC

Sec

, Rp

po, D

onor

s

St6/

o1/

a1.5

hire

a fu

ll-tim

e fu

ndra

iser

in t

he ip

pC S

ecre

taria

tip

pC S

ecn

ppo

, Rpp

o,

Fao

and

oth

ers

trus

t Fun

ds, i

ppC

Sec,

D

onor

sSt

aff r

esou

rce

shar

ed w

ith

othe

r are

as

of th

e ip

pC

St6/

o2/

a1.6

trai

n us

ers

on s

yste

m o

pera

tions

.ip

pC S

ecn

ppo

s an

d Rp

pos

Don

ors

St6/

o2/

a2.

1en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

to ra

ise

fund

s fr

om

natio

nal s

ourc

es.

Und

erta

ke n

atio

nal b

asel

ine

anal

ysis

and

det

erm

ine

leve

l of f

unds

requ

ired.

npp

oip

pC S

ec, R

ppo

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, Fa

o-t

Cp,

Don

ors

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

will

be

base

d on

nee

d an

d co

st is

con

side

red

unde

r St1

St6/

o2/

a2.

2D

evel

op a

mec

hani

sm t

o en

sure

sus

tain

abili

ty o

f the

op

erat

ions

of a

n n

ppo

, inc

ludi

ng c

ost s

harin

g /c

ost-

reco

very

/use

r-pay

mod

els

npp

oip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, nat

iona

l st

akeh

olde

rs

nat

iona

l, ip

pC S

ec,

Rppo

, nat

iona

l end

-us

er o

f pS

serv

ices

, D

onor

s

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

will

be

base

d on

nee

d an

d pr

iorit

y an

d co

st is

con

side

red

unde

r St

1

St6/

o2/

a2.

3n

ppo

man

agem

ent d

evel

ops

and

purs

ues

appr

opria

te

fund

ing

leve

l thr

ough

the

nat

iona

l bud

geta

ry p

roce

sses

npp

on

atio

nal

stak

ehol

ders

ippC

Sec

, Rpp

o,

nat

iona

l end

-use

r of p

S se

rvic

es, D

onor

s

nat

iona

l act

ivit

ies

will

be

base

d on

nee

d an

d co

st is

con

side

red

unde

r St1

20

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

7: A

dvoc

acy

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St7/

o1/a

1.1

enha

nced

invo

lvem

ent

of t

he n

ppo

in

form

ulat

ing

rele

vant

na

tiona

l pol

icie

s

Dev

elop

tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

; del

iver

tra

inin

g; e

valu

ate

trai

ning

impa

ct o

n po

licy

mul

tinat

ion-

al o

rgan

iza-

tions

Fao

. ipp

C Se

c.,

Rppo

/Re

CS

and

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns

iFa

D, F

ao

, WB,

npp

o

St7/

o1/a

1.2

nat

iona

l and

regi

onal

men

torin

gn

ppo

/Rp

poip

pC S

ecn

ppo

/Rp

poC

ostin

g on

ly s

taff

requ

ired

by ip

pC S

ec

and

Rppo

St7/

o1/a

1.3

Con

duct

stu

dy o

f pol

icy

docu

men

ts fo

r pos

sibl

e im

pact

on

the

phy

tosa

nita

ry s

yste

mRp

po/R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

za-

tions

Fao

Rppo

, ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, iFa

D,

Fao

, WB,

npp

o

St7/

o2/

a2.

2en

hanc

ed n

ppo

ca

paci

ty t

o pr

omot

e th

eir o

wn

capa

city

de

velo

pmen

t nee

ds

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r phy

tosa

nita

ry c

apac

ity

build

ing

base

d on

par

is p

rinci

ples

ippC

Sec

Fao

, npp

os,

Rp

pos

StD

F,Fa

o,W

B

St7/

o3/

a3.

1n

ppo

s ha

ve b

ette

r ca

paci

ty t

o de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ent

com

mun

icat

ion/

advo

cacy

str

ateg

ies

Dev

elop

tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

ippC

Sec

Fao

Fao

, WB,

iFa

D

Del

iver

tra

inin

gRp

pos,

ReC

S an

d ot

her o

rga-

niza

tions

expe

rt/

npp

o/

ippC

Sec

eval

uate

tra

inin

g im

pact

npp

oex

pert

St7/

o4/

a4.

1en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

to

coor

dina

te n

atio

nal

stak

ehol

ders

enga

ge in

dust

ry a

nd o

ther

priv

ate

sect

or s

take

hold

ers

and

ng

os

npp

oRp

po/

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

priv

ate

Sect

or, n

ppo

, Rp

po, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

St7/

o4/

a4.

2Fo

rmal

ize

regu

lar l

inka

ges

– br

idge

bui

ldin

g w

ith

cust

oms,

imm

igra

tion,

tra

de g

roup

s an

d pr

ivat

e se

ctor

npp

oRe

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

nspr

ivat

e Se

ctor

, npp

o,

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

St7/

o4/

a4.

3en

cour

age

publ

ic p

rivat

e pa

rtne

rshi

p w

ith u

sers

of t

he

phyt

osan

itar

y se

rvic

en

ppo

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

priv

ate

Sect

or, n

ppo

, Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

St7/

o4/

a4.

4D

evel

op a

nd p

rom

ote

case

stu

dies

of p

rivat

e se

ctor

/pu

blic

sec

tor c

olla

bora

tion

to a

chie

ve p

hyto

sani

tary

/

bio

secu

rity

/ m

arke

t acc

ess

obje

ctiv

es

StD

F, ip

pC

Sec

and

othe

rs

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, Rp

po, F

ao

, ip

pC S

ec

npp

o, F

ao

, WB,

Rp

po, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, S

tDF

St7/

o5/

a5.

1en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

of re

gion

al b

odie

s to

influ

ence

, ass

ist,

and

prom

ote

natio

nal

polic

y

Cre

ate

fora

for i

nter

chan

ge o

f exp

erie

nces

and

ski

lls o

n ph

ytos

anit

ary

advo

cacy

am

ong

regi

onal

org

aniz

atio

nsRp

po/i

ppC

Sec

Fao

, ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

StD

F, n

ppo

, WB,

Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, R

ppo

St7/

o5/

a5.

2U

tiliz

e ot

her i

nter

natio

nal f

ora

(e.g

. ape

C) t

o ad

voca

te

for n

atio

nal p

hyto

sani

tary

sys

tem

sRp

po/R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

za-

tions

ippC

Sec

StD

F, n

ppo

, WB,

Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, R

ppo

St7/

o5/

a5.

3C

ondu

ct b

asel

ine

stud

y of

Rpp

o re

leva

nce

ippC

Sec

npp

o, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Fao

, npp

o, R

eCS

and

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns

St7/

o6/

a6.

1en

hanc

ed t

he c

apac

ity

of c

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s to

gen

erat

e, a

cces

s an

d re

trie

ve d

ata

and

info

rmat

ion

on a

dvoc

acy

Dev

elop

too

ls fo

r evi

denc

e ba

sed

advo

cacy

(eco

nom

ic

anal

ysis

, cos

t/be

nefit

, etc

)St

DF,

Fa

on

ppo

sRp

po, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, i

FaD

, Fa

o, W

B, n

ppo

ong

oing

St7/

o6/

a6.

2Re

view

of c

urre

nt p

hyto

sani

tary

adv

ocac

y an

d co

mm

unic

atio

n do

cum

enta

tion

npp

o, i

ppC

Sec,

oth

er

orga

niza

-tio

ns

Rppo

s, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

ippC

, Fa

o, W

B, S

tDF,

n

ppo

, ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, Rpp

o

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

8: M

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St8/

o1/a

1.1

mon

itor

ing

and

eval

uatio

n to

ols

deve

lope

d an

d us

ed

thro

ugho

ut t

he

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

gl

obal

phy

tosa

nita

ry

stra

tegy

at a

ll le

vels

iden

tify

exis

tenc

e an

d us

e of

m&

e to

ols

by c

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s an

d ot

hers

ippC

Sec

npp

os

Don

ors

St8/

o1/a

1.2

m&

e to

ols

deve

lope

d or

ada

pted

,ip

pC S

ecn

ppo

s an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

Don

ors

St8/

o1/

a1.3

Dev

elop

and

pop

ulat

e a

depo

sito

ry t

ool

ippC

Sec

npp

os

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors

St8/

o1/

a1.4

trai

ning

in u

se o

f m&

e to

ols

(incl

udin

g us

e of

the

de

posi

tory

)ip

pC S

ecD

onor

s

St8/

o1/a

1.5

ippC

sec

reta

riat (

and

othe

rs) p

rom

ote

use

of m

&e

and

depo

sito

ry t

ools

ippC

Se

c, n

p-po

s an

d ot

her

orga

ni-

zatio

ns

Don

ors

St8/

o1/

a1.7

adj

ust m

&e

tool

whe

n ne

cess

ary

ippC

Se

c,

npp

os

Don

ors,

inte

rest

ed

ng

os

St8/

o2/

a2.

1pe

riodi

c re

view

and

as

sess

men

t bei

ng

cond

ucte

d

part

ner w

ith le

adin

g or

gani

zatio

ns t

o co

nduc

t rev

iew

s an

d as

sess

men

tip

pC S

ecD

onor

s

St8/

o3/

a3

Con

tinua

l pro

cess

of

impr

ovem

ent (

adap

tive

m

anag

emen

t)

Shar

e re

view

resu

lts a

s ap

prop

riate

and

impl

emen

t co

rrect

ive

mea

sure

sip

pCD

onor

so

ngoi

ng

21

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

7: A

dvoc

acy

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St7/

o1/a

1.1

enha

nced

invo

lvem

ent

of t

he n

ppo

in

form

ulat

ing

rele

vant

na

tiona

l pol

icie

s

Dev

elop

tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

; del

iver

tra

inin

g; e

valu

ate

trai

ning

impa

ct o

n po

licy

mul

tinat

ion-

al o

rgan

iza-

tions

Fao

. ipp

C Se

c.,

Rppo

/Re

CS

and

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns

iFa

D, F

ao

, WB,

npp

o

St7/

o1/a

1.2

nat

iona

l and

regi

onal

men

torin

gn

ppo

/Rp

poip

pC S

ecn

ppo

/Rp

poC

ostin

g on

ly s

taff

requ

ired

by ip

pC S

ec

and

Rppo

St7/

o1/a

1.3

Con

duct

stu

dy o

f pol

icy

docu

men

ts fo

r pos

sibl

e im

pact

on

the

phy

tosa

nita

ry s

yste

mRp

po/R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

za-

tions

Fao

Rppo

, ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, iFa

D,

Fao

, WB,

npp

o

St7/

o2/

a2.

2en

hanc

ed n

ppo

ca

paci

ty t

o pr

omot

e th

eir o

wn

capa

city

de

velo

pmen

t nee

ds

Dev

elop

gui

delin

es fo

r phy

tosa

nita

ry c

apac

ity

build

ing

base

d on

par

is p

rinci

ples

ippC

Sec

Fao

, npp

os,

Rp

pos

StD

F,Fa

o,W

B

St7/

o3/

a3.

1n

ppo

s ha

ve b

ette

r ca

paci

ty t

o de

velo

p an

d im

plem

ent

com

mun

icat

ion/

advo

cacy

str

ateg

ies

Dev

elop

tra

inin

g m

ater

ials

ippC

Sec

Fao

Fao

, WB,

iFa

D

Del

iver

tra

inin

gRp

pos,

ReC

S an

d ot

her o

rga-

niza

tions

expe

rt/

npp

o/

ippC

Sec

eval

uate

tra

inin

g im

pact

npp

oex

pert

St7/

o4/

a4.

1en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

to

coor

dina

te n

atio

nal

stak

ehol

ders

enga

ge in

dust

ry a

nd o

ther

priv

ate

sect

or s

take

hold

ers

and

ng

os

npp

oRp

po/

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

priv

ate

Sect

or, n

ppo

, Rp

po, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

St7/

o4/

a4.

2Fo

rmal

ize

regu

lar l

inka

ges

– br

idge

bui

ldin

g w

ith

cust

oms,

imm

igra

tion,

tra

de g

roup

s an

d pr

ivat

e se

ctor

npp

oRe

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

nspr

ivat

e Se

ctor

, npp

o,

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

St7/

o4/

a4.

3en

cour

age

publ

ic p

rivat

e pa

rtne

rshi

p w

ith u

sers

of t

he

phyt

osan

itar

y se

rvic

en

ppo

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

priv

ate

Sect

or, n

ppo

, Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

St7/

o4/

a4.

4D

evel

op a

nd p

rom

ote

case

stu

dies

of p

rivat

e se

ctor

/pu

blic

sec

tor c

olla

bora

tion

to a

chie

ve p

hyto

sani

tary

/

bio

secu

rity

/ m

arke

t acc

ess

obje

ctiv

es

StD

F, ip

pC

Sec

and

othe

rs

ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, Rp

po, F

ao

, ip

pC S

ec

npp

o, F

ao

, WB,

Rp

po, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, S

tDF

St7/

o5/

a5.

1en

hanc

ed c

apac

ity

of re

gion

al b

odie

s to

influ

ence

, ass

ist,

and

prom

ote

natio

nal

polic

y

Cre

ate

fora

for i

nter

chan

ge o

f exp

erie

nces

and

ski

lls o

n ph

ytos

anit

ary

advo

cacy

am

ong

regi

onal

org

aniz

atio

nsRp

po/i

ppC

Sec

Fao

, ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

StD

F, n

ppo

, WB,

Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, R

ppo

St7/

o5/

a5.

2U

tiliz

e ot

her i

nter

natio

nal f

ora

(e.g

. ape

C) t

o ad

voca

te

for n

atio

nal p

hyto

sani

tary

sys

tem

sRp

po/R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

za-

tions

ippC

Sec

StD

F, n

ppo

, WB,

Re

CS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, R

ppo

St7/

o5/

a5.

3C

ondu

ct b

asel

ine

stud

y of

Rpp

o re

leva

nce

ippC

Sec

npp

o, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Fao

, npp

o, R

eCS

and

othe

r org

aniz

atio

ns

St7/

o6/

a6.

1en

hanc

ed t

he c

apac

ity

of c

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s to

gen

erat

e, a

cces

s an

d re

trie

ve d

ata

and

info

rmat

ion

on a

dvoc

acy

Dev

elop

too

ls fo

r evi

denc

e ba

sed

advo

cacy

(eco

nom

ic

anal

ysis

, cos

t/be

nefit

, etc

)St

DF,

Fa

on

ppo

sRp

po, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns, i

FaD

, Fa

o, W

B, n

ppo

ong

oing

St7/

o6/

a6.

2Re

view

of c

urre

nt p

hyto

sani

tary

adv

ocac

y an

d co

mm

unic

atio

n do

cum

enta

tion

npp

o, i

ppC

Sec,

oth

er

orga

niza

-tio

ns

Rppo

s, R

eCS

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

ippC

, Fa

o, W

B, S

tDF,

n

ppo

, ReC

S an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

, Rpp

o

Stra

tegi

c A

rea

8: M

onito

ring

and

eval

uatio

n

Act

ivit

y N

o.O

utpu

tSu

b-ac

tivi

ties

Lead

en

tity

Supp

orte

d by

Fund

ing

Opt

ions

Not

es/

Com

men

ts

St8/

o1/a

1.1

mon

itor

ing

and

eval

uatio

n to

ols

deve

lope

d an

d us

ed

thro

ugho

ut t

he

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

gl

obal

phy

tosa

nita

ry

stra

tegy

at a

ll le

vels

iden

tify

exis

tenc

e an

d us

e of

m&

e to

ols

by c

ontr

actin

g pa

rtie

s an

d ot

hers

ippC

Sec

npp

os

Don

ors

St8/

o1/a

1.2

m&

e to

ols

deve

lope

d or

ada

pted

,ip

pC S

ecn

ppo

s an

d ot

her

orga

niza

tions

Don

ors

St8/

o1/

a1.3

Dev

elop

and

pop

ulat

e a

depo

sito

ry t

ool

ippC

Sec

npp

os

and

othe

r or

gani

zatio

ns

Don

ors

St8/

o1/

a1.4

trai

ning

in u

se o

f m&

e to

ols

(incl

udin

g us

e of

the

de

posi

tory

)ip

pC S

ecD

onor

s

St8/

o1/a

1.5

ippC

sec

reta

riat (

and

othe

rs) p

rom

ote

use

of m

&e

and

depo

sito

ry t

ools

ippC

Se

c, n

p-po

s an

d ot

her

orga

ni-

zatio

ns

Don

ors

St8/

o1/

a1.7

adj

ust m

&e

tool

whe

n ne

cess

ary

ippC

Se

c,

npp

os

Don

ors,

inte

rest

ed

ng

os

St8/

o2/

a2.

1pe

riodi

c re

view

and

as

sess

men

t bei

ng

cond

ucte

d

part

ner w

ith le

adin

g or

gani

zatio

ns t

o co

nduc

t rev

iew

s an

d as

sess

men

tip

pC S

ecD

onor

s

St8/

o3/

a3

Con

tinua

l pro

cess

of

impr

ovem

ent (

adap

tive

m

anag

emen

t)

Shar

e re

view

resu

lts a

s ap

prop

riate

and

impl

emen

t co

rrect

ive

mea

sure

sip

pCD

onor

so

ngoi

ng


IPPCthe international plant protection Convention (ippC) is an international plant health agreement that aims to protect cultivated and wild plants by preventing the introduction and spread of pests. international travel and trade are greater than ever before. as people and commodities move around the world, organisms that present risks to plants travel with them.

Organization + the number of contracting party signatories to the

Convention exceeds 177. + each contracting party has a national plant protection

organization (nppo) and an official ippC contact point. + 10 Regional plant protection organizations (Rppos) have

been established to coordinate nppos in various regions of the world.

+ ippC liaises with relevant international organizations to help build regional and national capacities.

+ the Secretariat is provided by the Food and agriculture organization of the United nations (Fao-Un).

International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC)

viale delle terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, italy

tel: +39 06 5705 4812 - Fax: +39 06 5705 4819

email: [email protected] - Web: www.ippc.int

the ippC Secretariat is hosted and provided by

IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy · 2016-01-14 · Capa C ity Development...

Documents

Transcript of IPPC National Phytosanitary Capacity Development Strategy · 2016-01-14 · Capa C ity Development...