INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURE - ec.europa.eu · INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURE THE 8TH CONFERENCE...
1
INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURE THE 8 TH CONFERENCE ON THE EVALUATION OF EU COHESION POLICY AUTHOR(S) OF THE EVALUATION CONTACT PERSON ISRI – INSTITUTE OF STUDIES ON INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Paola Tabor [email protected] MAIN FINDINGS The survey revealed that participants of the process appear satisfied: • more than 50 % consider their own role positive and active; • more than 75 % consider the participation of regional stakeholders to be good or sufficient; • more than 35 % consider the contribution of the stakeholders to the definition of RIS3 to be very significant; • approximately 80 % believe that RIS3 is capable of enhancing the strengths and potentials of the regional innovative system, even if many of these show some uncertainty in this regard; • majority of respondents have no doubt that the results achieved have rewarded their efforts; i.e. that it was really worth it. SOME PARTIAL CRITICAL ISSUES EMERGED • Choices made in the definition of RIS3 seem to reflect some positions better than others. • The involvement of some actors, especially in civil society, has been missed, also because of the difficulties in identifying the representatives of certain categories of interests. As regards the governance system of the RIS3, the evaluator’s analyses highlighted some critical issues to be corrected to guarantee a more fluid process, mainly related to the lack of effective unitary coordination within the Regional Administration. This is also due to the sharing of the coordination role in different services – a single manager would be preferred – and a lack of clear division of tasks. A common and shared procedure for the involvement of stakeholders in defining the RIS3 would be preferred, as well. EVALUATION QUESTIONS • Assessment of the process conducted and critical issues met. • Assessment of the actual participation of stakeholders, their opinion about activities attended and their own contribution. • Judgment on the final results of the decision-making process. • Opinion of the participants on the results achieved. METHODOLOGY USED Desk and field-BASED analysis. DATA SOURCES Online questionnaires submitted to subjects involved/invited to the RIS3 process. FUND(S) COVERED • European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) • European Social Fund (ESF) PROGRAMMING PERIOD • 2014-2020 PROGRAMME(S) COVERED • Regional Operational Programme ESF 2014-2020 • Regional Operational Programme ERDF 2014-2020 THEMATIC OBJECTIVE(S) • TO01: Research and innovation TYPE OF EVALUATION • Process YEAR OF COMPLETION • 2018 The governance model for S3 in Friuli Venezia Giulia • AUTONOMOUS REGION FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA Probably yes 32,3 % The view of the process managers The view of stakeholders Absolutly not 3,2 % Don’t know 3,2 % Probably not 3,2 % Absolutely yes 58,1 % Probably yes 34,8 % Absolutly not 1,1 % Don’t know 5,5 % Probably not 10,5 % Absolutely yes 48,1 % AGRIFOOD INDUSTRY MARITIME TECHNOLOGIES SMART HEALTH CULTURE, CREATIVITY AND TOURISM STRATEGIC PRODUCTION CHAIN (HOME SYSTEM) STRATEGIC PRODUCTION CHAIN (METAL - MECHANICAL SECTOR FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA RIS3 Coffee, wines, beverages, cured meats Top producers: IIly coffee, San Daniele ham Shipbuilding, Boat construction Transport, logistics and navigation services Top producers: Fincantieri, Monte Carlo Yacht Machinery, equipment, metal products Top producers: Danieli, Wartsila Italia Timber industry, manufacturing of wood products, production of furniture Top producers: Calligaris, Snaidero In FVG almost 50% of tourist spending (49.7%) is connected to culture - second place in Italy BioHighTech Biomedical (BioMed) Biotechnology (BioTech) Bioinformatics (BiolCT) Area connected also to regional healthcare and social policies Overview of Friuli Venezia Giulia RIS3 Priorities – Area of specialisation Have the results rewarded the effort?
Transcript of INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURE - ec.europa.eu · INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURE THE 8TH CONFERENCE...
INVESTING IN OUR SHARED FUTURETHE 8TH CONFERENCE ON THE EVALUATION OF EU COHESION POLICY
AUTHOR(S) OF THE EVALUATION CONTACT PERSON ISRI – INSTITUTE OF STUDIES ON INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
Paola Tabor [email protected]
MAIN FINDINGSThe survey revealed that participants of the process appear satisfied:• more than 50 % consider their own
role positive and active;• more than 75 % consider the
participation of regional stakeholders to be good or sufficient;
• more than 35 % consider the contribution of the stakeholders to the definition of RIS3 to be very significant;
• approximately 80 % believe that RIS3 is capable of enhancing the strengths and potentials of the regional innovative system, even if many of these show some uncertainty in this regard;
• majority of respondents have no doubt that the results achieved have rewarded their efforts; i.e. that it was really worth it.
SOME PARTIAL CRITICAL ISSUES EMERGED• Choices made in the definition of RIS3
seem to reflect some positions better than others.
• The involvement of some actors, especially in civil society, has been missed, also because of the difficulties in identifying the representatives of certain categories of interests.
As regards the governance system of the RIS3, the evaluator’s analyses highlighted some critical issues to be corrected to guarantee a more fluid process, mainly related to the lack of effective unitary coordination within the Regional Administration. This is also due to the sharing of the coordination role in different services – a single manager would be preferred – and a lack of clear division of tasks. A common and shared procedure for the involvement of stakeholders in defining the RIS3 would be preferred, as well.
EVALUATION QUESTIONS• Assessment of the process conducted
and critical issues met.• Assessment of the actual participation
of stakeholders, their opinion about activities attended and their own contribution.
• Judgment on the final results of the decision-making process.
• Opinion of the participants on the results achieved.
METHODOLOGY USEDDesk and field-BASED analysis.
DATA SOURCESOnline questionnaires submitted to subjects involved/invited to the RIS3 process.
FUND(S) COVERED• European Regional Development
Fund (ERDF)• European Social Fund (ESF)
PROGRAMMING PERIOD• 2014-2020
PROGRAMME(S) COVERED• Regional Operational Programme
ESF 2014-2020• Regional Operational Programme
ERDF 2014-2020
THEMATIC OBJECTIVE(S)• TO01: Research and innovation
TYPE OF EVALUATION• Process
YEAR OF COMPLETION• 2018
The governance model for S3 in Friuli Venezia Giulia •
AUTONOMOUS REGION FRIULI VENEZIA GIULIA
Probably yes 32,3 %
The view of the process managers
The view of stakeholders
Absolutly not 3,2 %Don’t know 3,2 %
Probably not 3,2 %
Absolutely yes 58,1 %
Probably yes 34,8 %
Absolutly not 1,1 %Don’t know 5,5 %
Probably not 10,5 %
Absolutely yes 48,1 %
AGRIFOODINDUSTRY
MARITIMETECHNOLOGIES
SMARTHEALTH
CULTURE,CREATIVITY
ANDTOURISM
STRATEGICPRODUCTIONCHAIN (HOME
SYSTEM)
STRATEGIC PRODUCTION
CHAIN (METAL - MECHANICAL
SECTORFRIULI
VENEZIAGIULIARIS3
Coffee, wines, beverages, cured meats
Top producers: IIly coffee,
San Daniele ham
Shipbuilding, Boat construction
Transport, logistics and navigation
servicesTop producers:
Fincantieri,Monte Carlo Yacht
Machinery, equipment,
metal productsTop producers:
Danieli, Wartsila Italia
Timber industry,manufacturing of wood products,
production of furniture
Top producers: Calligaris,Snaidero
In FVG almost 50% of tourist
spending (49.7%) is connected to culture -
second place in Italy
BioHighTechBiomedical (BioMed)
Biotechnology(BioTech)
Bioinformatics (BiolCT)Area connected also to regional
healthcare and social policies
Overview of Friuli Venezia Giulia RIS3Priorities – Area of specialisation
Have the results rewarded the effort?
