INVESTIGATED ATTITUDE AND RELATED LEARNING FACTORS: …
Transcript of INVESTIGATED ATTITUDE AND RELATED LEARNING FACTORS: …
i
INVESTIGATED ATTITUDE AND RELATED
LEARNING FACTORS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF
ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REPORTS
A Thesis
Presented to the Graduate Program in English Language Studies
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Magister Humaniora (M.Hum)
in English Language Studies
SUPRIYANI
156332008
THE GRADUATE PROGRAM OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2017
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
i
INVESTIGATED ATTITUDE AND RELATED
LEARNING FACTORS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF
ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REPORTS
A Thesis
Presented to the Graduate Program in English Language Studies
in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Magister Humaniora (M.Hum)
in English Language Studies
SUPRIYANI
156332008
THE GRADUATE PROGRAM OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2017
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
A THESIS
INVESTIGATED ATTITUDE AND RELATEDLEARNII\G FACTORS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OFENGLISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REPORTS
Dr. J. Bismoko
Thesis Advisor Yogyakarta, T July 2017
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
TI{ESIS DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE
INWESTIGATED ATTITUDE AIYD RELATEI)LEARNING FACTORS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OFENGLISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCII REPORTS
Presented by
Supriyani
Student Number: I 56332008
Was defended in front ofthe Thesis Committeeand Declarcd Acceptable
Chairperson
Secretary
Member
Member
Thesis Committee
Dr. B.B. Dwijatmoko, M.A.
Dr. J. Bismoko
F.X. Mukarto, Ph.D.
Dr. E. Sunarto, M.Hum.
lll
fLe-&
14 Jttly ZAfiProgram Director
University
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
:
STATEMENT OT ORIGINALITY
This is to certifu that this thesis is definitely my original work. I am completelyresponsible for the content of this thesis. Otlrer writers' opinions or findings includedin this project are quoted or iited in accordance with ethnical standard. I understandthe full con$equences including degree cancellation if I took somebody else,sideas, phrases, or sentences without proper references.
Yogyakarta,T Jaly2017
e$$,Supriyani
t.:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
v
MOTTO
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
LE MBAR PE RNYATAAN PE RS E TAJAAN PTTB LIKAS I KARYAILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma:
Nama : SupriyaniNomor Mahasiswa : 156332008
Demi pengernbangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada PerpustakaanUniversitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul:
INVESTIGATED ATTITUDE AND RELATED LEARNING FACTORS: ACONTENT ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCII
RE,PORTS
Beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian saya memberikankepada Perpustakaan Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan, mengalihkan datadalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data,mendistribusikan secara terbatas, dan mempublikasikannya di intemet atau medialain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta ijin dari saya maupunmemberikan royalti kepada saya selama tetap mencantukan nama saya sebagaipenulis.
Dernikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.
Dibuat di YogyakartaPada tanggal: 7 Juli 2017
Yang menyatakan
vi
Supriyani
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to give my endless gratitude to Allah SWT for giving me
everything in my life so that I can finish this thesis entitled “Investigated Attitude
and Related Learning Factors: A Content Analysis of English Educational
Research Reports”. Without Allah’s guidance, this thesis writing could not have
been accomplished.
I would also like to convey my gratitude to my thesis supervisor, Dr. J.
Bismoko, who has guided me and given some suggestions in finishing this thesis
with a great patience. I was also blessed to have Dr. B.B. Dwijatmoko, M.A., and
F.X. Mukarto, Ph.D. as my thesis reviewers and Dr. E. Sunarto, M. Hum. as
my thesis examiner who opened up my limited knowledge I had during this thesis
writing. Indeed, their suggestions have broadened my insight in thesis writing.
The special gratitude to my beloved parents, Kemisah and Jinal. Thank
you for raising, educating and loving me. Thank you for the unstoppable support
from my uncle Tukiran, my aunt Susilawati and my cousins Yoga and Shinta.
To all of my precious friends, Asri Nurwardani, Dewi Sundari, Yulia
Adhyaksa, Eni Yuniasih, Putri Dwi Aprianti, Widayati Mia Pratiwi, Puput
Kusumawati, Uswatun Khasanah, Nunung Khusnul Khotimah, and the
special ones Monica Sindhi Galih Susanti and Agatha Lisa who struggled
together with me during the thesis writing. I am so lucky to have you all beside
me.
Supriyani
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE ......................................................................................................... i
APPROVAL PAGE .............................................................................................. ii THESIS DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE .......................................................... iii STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ................................................................... iv MOTTO ..................................................................................................................v
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI ................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................ vii TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................x
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................. xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................ xii ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................ xiii
ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................ xiv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION...........................................................................1 A. RESEARCH BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 1
B. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION ...................................................................... 5
C. SCOPE OF THE STUDY ................................................................................ 6 D. PROBLEM FORMULATION ......................................................................... 6 E. RESEARCH GOALS ...................................................................................... 6
F. RESEARCH BENEFITS ................................................................................. 7
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................9 A. THEORETICAL REVIEW.............................................................................. 9
1. Competence-Based Learning ...................................................................... 9
a. History and Overview ............................................................................. 9 b. The Implementation of Competence-Based Learning in Indonesia ..... 11
2. Attitude ...................................................................................................... 15 a. Narrow Meanings ................................................................................. 15
b. Broad Meanings .................................................................................... 17 c. Attitude toward English Language Learning........................................ 20 d. Attitude and Related Learning Factors ................................................. 22
3. English Learning Factors .......................................................................... 24 a. Motivation ............................................................................................ 24
b. Perception ............................................................................................. 25 c. Belief .................................................................................................... 26 d. Learning Style ...................................................................................... 27 e. Learning Strategy ................................................................................. 28
4. English Educational Research Reports ..................................................... 29
5. Classification Area of English ................................................................... 34
a. Inner-Circle Countries .......................................................................... 34
b. Outer-Circle Countries ......................................................................... 35
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
c. Expanding-Circle Countries ................................................................. 35 6. Content Analysis ....................................................................................... 36
a. Definition and Function ........................................................................ 36 b. Types .................................................................................................... 38 c. Procedures of Conducting Content Analysis ........................................ 40
B. RELATED STUDIES .................................................................................... 43 C. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................. 45
CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY ....................................................................48 A. RESEARCH GOALS AND METHOD ......................................................... 48 B. NATURE AND SOURCES OF DATA ........................................................ 49 C. INSTRUMENTS ............................................................................................ 51 D. DATA GATHERING .................................................................................... 51 E. DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION ............................................... 53
F. VALIDITY .................................................................................................... 54
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...........................56 A. ANALYSIS RESULTS ................................................................................. 56
1. Investigated Topic ..................................................................................... 57 2. Concept Clarification of Attitude and Related Learning Factors .............. 59 3. Related Topic ............................................................................................ 62
4. Origin ........................................................................................................ 64
5. Participant .................................................................................................. 65 6. Research Goal ........................................................................................... 67 7. Research Design and Method .................................................................... 70
8. Data Gathering Instrument ........................................................................ 72 9. Data Analysis Technique .......................................................................... 74
10. Sampling Technique ............................................................................... 75 11. Validation Technique .............................................................................. 77 12. Research Result ....................................................................................... 78
B. DISCUSSION ................................................................................................ 82 1. The Trends of Research on Attitude and Related Learning Factors in
English Education ..................................................................................... 82 2. The Relation between The Trends of Research on Attitude and Related
Learning Factors and Competence-based Learning .................................. 83
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS ..92 A. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 92 B. IMPLICATIONS ........................................................................................... 95
C. SUGGESTIONS ............................................................................................ 96
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................98
APPENDICES ....................................................................................................104 Appendix 1: Data Sources ........................................................................... 104
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports .... 112
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 The Classification of National Education Goals ..............................12
Table 2.2 The Graduate Competence Standards of 2013 Curriculum ..............14
Table 2.3 Values of Cultural Education and Character of 2013 Curriculum ...18
Table 3.1 The Content of the Investigated Research Reports ...........................52
Table 4.1 Concept Clarification of Attitude and Related Learning Factors in
English Education ............................................................................ 60
Table 4.2 Research Goals .................................................................................68
Table 4.3 Research Results ...............................................................................78
Table 4.4 The Summary of the Analysis Results ..............................................82
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 The Balance among Three Competences of 2013 Curriculum .........13
Figure 2.2 A Framework for Content Analysis ..................................................41
Figure 2.4 Framework of Pre-understannding ...................................................47
Figure 4.1 Investigated Topics ...........................................................................58
Figure 4.2 Related Topics ..................................................................................62
Figure 4.3 Origin of the Research Reports .........................................................64
Figure 4.4 Participants .......................................................................................66
Figure 4.5 Research Design and Methods ..........................................................71
Figure 4.6 Data Gathering Instruments ..............................................................73
Figure 4.7 Data Analysis Techniques ................................................................74
Figure 4.8 Sampling Techniques ........................................................................76
Figure 4.9 Validition Techniques .......................................................................77
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CBL Competence-based Learning
CBE Competence-based Education
ECC Expanding-Circle Countries
OCC Outer-Circle Countries
ICC Inner-Circle Countries
ENL English as a Native Language
EFL English as a Foreign Language
ESL English as a Second Language
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiii
ABSTRACT
Supriyani. 2017. Investigated Attitude and Related Learning Factors: A Content
Analysis of English Educational Research Reports. Yogyakarta: The Graduate
Program, English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma University.
Competence-based Learning (CBL) is implemented as current approach in
education. The implementation of this approach resulted in a large number of research
which had been conducted on attitude, skills and knowledge in English education. It leads
to the emergence of certain trends. Among the three competences in CBL, the researcher
wanted to focus on attitude only. Thus, this research aims to find out the trends of English
educational research on attitude and five related learning factors namely motivation,
perception, belief, leaning style and learning strategy. The terms attitude within this
research is divided into two namely narrow and broad meanings. Attitude in narrow
meaning refers to a variable consisting of affective, behavior and cognitive components
which is commonly divided into positive and negative. Meanwhile attitude in broad
meaning is derived from 2013 Curriculum. It comprises of spiritual and social, including
18 character values. Five related learning factors in this research affect the formation of
attitude, hence, they are also examined.
This research is a content analysis. One hundred research reports dealing with
attitude and five related learning factors were collected from open sources as the data
sources. Most of them were taken from TEFLIN Proceedings, TEFLIN Journals,
Indonesian Journal of English Education and International Journal of English and
Education. The instrument of this research is the researcher herself who utilized keywords
to collect research reports from open sources and a table to manage the data. The data
were firstly analyzed by using the table which was designed in Microsoft Excel to
discover the occurrences. The results of this quantitative analysis were presented in charts
and tables, and followed by explanation. Then the relation between research trends and
the concept of attitude in Competence-based Learning was examined through
interpretation.
The results of research trends revealed English educational researches had
explored several topics on attitude and related learning factors with the findings as
follows: motivation (22.6%), perception (21.7%), attitude (19.1% in its narrow meaning
and 0.9% in its broad meaning), belief (12.2%), learning strategy (10.4%), learning style
(6.1%), preference (2.6%), creativity (1.7%), confidence (0.9%), honesty (0.9%) and
tolerance (0.9%). These topics were commonly associated with teaching methods,
English skills and knowledge. University student was found as the most common research
subject. The studied research reports were conducted both quantitatively (using
descriptive statistics) and qualitatively (using qualitative analysis). Questionnaire and
interview were found as the most frequently used instruments. Both sampling and validity
techniques were used in a small number of research. In terms of research results, most of
the participants hold positive attitude, perception, belief towards English language
teaching and learning. Meanwhile the results of latent analysis revealed that many topics
of attitude in CBL had not been explored. However, the principle of CBL had been
yielded. Therefore, it is suggested for future researchers to conduct research on other
unexplored topics related to attitude in its broad meaning, such as curiosity, responsibility
and so on, so that the development of English education, particularly regarding to attitude
in CBL can be exposed.
Keywords: attitude, learning factors, Competence-based Learning, content analysis
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiv
ABSTRAK
Supriyani. 2017. Investigated Attitude and Related Learning Factors: A Content
Analysis of English Educational Research Reports. Yogyakarta: Kajian Bahasa
Inggris. Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi (PBK) telah diterapkan sebagai pendekatan
dalam bidang pendidikan saat ini. Penerapan pendekatan ini menyebabkan banyaknya
penelitian yang dilakukan dalam pendidikan Bahasa Inggris mengenai sikap, keterampilan
dan pengetahuan. Hal ini mengarah pada munculnya tren tertentu. Di antara tiga kompetensi,
peneliti hanya fokus pada konsep sikap dalam PBK. Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini bertujuan
untuk mengetahui tren dalam penelitian tentang sikap dan lima faktor pembelajaran terkait
yaitu motivasi, persepsi, keyakinan, gaya belajar, dan strategi belajar. Istilah sikap dalam
penelitian ini dikategorikan menjadi dua, yakni artian sempit dan luas. Sikap dalam arti
sempit adalah sebuah variabel yang terdiri dari komponen afektif, perilaku dan kognitif yang
umumnya dibedakan menjadi positif dan negatif. Sementara sikap dalam arti luas berasal dari
Kurikulum 2013 yang terdiri dari spiritual dan sosial, termasuk di dalamnya 18 nilai karakter.
Lima sifat terkait dalam penelitian ini mempengaruhi pembentukan sikap, sehingga perlu
untuk diteliti.
Penelitian ini merupakan analisis isi. Sumber data dalam penelitian ini adalah seratus
laporan penelititan yang membahas tentang sikap dan faktor pembelajaran terkait yang
diambil dari sumber terbuka (internet). Hampir semuanya diambil dari TEFLIN Proceedings,
TEFLIN Journals, Indonesian Journal of English Education dan International Journal of English and Education. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini adalah peneliti sendiri yang
menggunakan kata kunci untuk menemukan laporan penelitian dari sumber terbuka dan tabel
untuk mengelola data. Pertama, data tersebut dianalisis menggunakan tabel yang dibuat di
Microsoft Excel untuk mengetahui frekuensi kemunculan. Hasil dari analisis kuantitatif ini
ditampilkan dalam grafik dan tabel yang diikuti dengan penjelasan. Kemudian, keterkaitan
antara tren dalam penelitian dan konsep sikap dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi
dianalisis berdasarkan interpretasi.
Hasil dari tren penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penelitian dalam pendidikan Bahasa
Inggris telah meneliti beberapa topik tentang sikap dan faktor pembelajaran terkait. Topik-
topik tersebut adalah motivasi (22.6%), persepsi (21.7%), sikap (19.1% dalam arti sempit dan
0.9% dalam arti luas), keyakinan (12.2%), strategi belajar (10.4%), gaya belajar (6.1%),
kecenderungan (2.6%), kreativitas (1.7%), rasa percaya diri (0.9%), kejujuran (0.9%), dan
toleransi (0.9%). Topik-topik ini umumnya dikaitkan dengan metode mengajar, keterampilan
dan pengetahuan Bahasa Inggris. Subyek penelitian yang paling banyak ditemukan adalah
mahasiswa. Penilitian-penilitian tersebut telah dilakukan baik secara kuantitatif (dengan
menggunakan statistika deskriptif) maupun kualitatif (dengan analis kualitatif). Kuesioner dan
wawancara merupakan instrumen yang paling banyak digunakan. Penggunaan sampel dan
validitas dalam penelitian-penelitian tersebut masih cukup jarang. Dalam hal hasil penelitian,
kebanyakan dari subyek penelitian menunjukkan sikap, persepsi dan keyakinan yang positif
terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Sementara itu, hasil dari analisis laten
mengungkapkan bahwa masih banyak topik-topik tentang sikap dalam PBK yang masih
belum diteliti. Akan tetapi, prinsip PBK sudah diterapkan. Oleh karenanya, disarankan untuk
melakukan penelitian terhadap topik-topik yang berhubungan dengan konsep sikap dalam arti
luas yang belum diteliti, seperti rasa ingin tahu, tanggung jawab dan lainnya, agar
perkembangan pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, terutama yang berkaitan dengan sikap dalam PBK
dapat diungkapkan.
Kata Kunci: sikap, faktor pembelajaran, Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi, analisis isi
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This initial chapter is intended to uncover the background underlying this
research. This chapter consists of six parts namely research background, problem
identification, scope of the study, problem formulation, research goals and
research benefits.
A. RESEARCH BACKGROUND
In the attempt to fulfill today’s world demands and challenges, preparing
young generation is one of the most possible solution to do. It has been widely
known that education can facilitate young generation to have good knowledge and
ability. Education, as pointed out by Hadi (2015), is not solely an effort to transfer
knowledge, but also to develop the students’ character so that they will become
individuals with high intelligence and good character. Therefore, having good
education will be beneficial.
It has been widely known that today’s education is more on student-
centered. This kind of change leads to the emergence of Competence-based
Learning. Sánchez and Ruiz (2008) highlight that this approach has been used in
Europe and US education system. The goal of this approach is to endow students
with knowledge and to enable them to apply such knowledge in various contexts.
This can be realized by developing students’ knowledge which is integrated along
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
with attitude and character values which are integrated in ways that are
appropriate for each student’s personal and professional life.
In Indonesia, the implementation of Competence-based Learning in
education started over ten years ago. For higher education, this approach has been
used since the year of 2000 in developing the higher education curriculum (The
Decree of National Ministry of Education No. 232/U/2000 and No. 045/U/2002).
Meanwhile for school level, it is emphasized in Competency-Based Curriculum in
2004, School-Level Curriculum in 2006 and emphasized more in 2013
Curriculum. The focus of this 2013 Curriculum (the latest curriculum in
Indonesia) as stated by Mulyasa (2014) is to develop students’ competences
(attitude, skills and knowledge) and characters. Though this notion, it can be
inferred that attitude, skills and knowledge are seen as the essential consideration
within the education and teaching learning process.
Due to the existence of Competence-based Learning in education field,
topics on attitude, skills and knowledge have become the researchers’ interest
since several years ago. Therefore, a large number of research which have been
conducted in education field, including English education, tended to investigate
about these competences (Lin and Cheng, 2010). Besides, their study also
revealed that teaching method was found as the most studied topic along with
these competences.
In line with the development of research in English education, a research
should be conducted to identify how far research in English education,
particularly in Indonesia, has exposed the implementation of Competence-based
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
Learning. Therefore, this research is conducted collaboratively with two other
researchers in order to cover those topics (three competences and teaching
method). This research focuses on investigating attitude and related learning
factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy
in English educational research reports which were published within the last ten
years. The two other researchers focus on examining skills, knowledge and
teaching method. Hence, in conducting this research the researcher shares the
similar concept with those two researches. The similarities are on the method,
instrument, and procedure of both data gathering and data analysis.
The term attitude itself refers to “a complex combination of things we tend
to call personality, beliefs, values, behaviors and motivations” (Pickens, 2005:
44). Eagly and Chaiken (1998, in Jain, 2014) state that attitude is constructed of
three components namely affective (feeling or emotion), behavior (ways of act),
and cognitive (thought, belief, perception, opinion). Meanwhile, attitude in
language learning can be defined as “a collection of feelings regarding language
use and its status in the society. The feelings are good, bad and neutral.” (Ahmed,
2015: 1). These definitions depict how important attitude for an individual is,
particularly when it comes to learning. These definitions are considered as the
narrow meaning of attitude. Mokhtar (2015) points out that attitude is important in
understanding and improving learning processes.
The concept of attitude in Competence-based Learning, particularly as
practiced in 2013 Curriculum is actually different from the narrow meaning of
attitude. This 2013 Curriculum differentiates attitude into spiritual and social.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
From these two broad classifications eighteen character values (e.g. religious,
honest, tolerance, responsible, etc.) are derived. This concept of attitude can be
determined as the broad meaning of attitude. On the other hand, attitude in narrow
meaning, as highlighted by Brown (2001), is commonly divided into positive and
negative (or good and bad).
Attitude in language learning has a relation with several learning factors
such as motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy.
Despagne (2010) mentions that attitude influences the formation of individual’s
motivation. Bahamonde-Birke, Kunert, Link and Ortúzar (2015) assert that
perception affects the formation of attitude through cognitive side. Similarly,
belief is also found to affect attitude formation from the cognitive side (Eagly and
Chaiken, 1998, in Jain, 2014). Furthermore, learning style is considered as one of
the factors affecting the formation of attitude through behavior side (Caliskan and
Kilinc, 2012). Regarding to learning strategy, as stated by Oxford (1990, in
Msuya, 2016), attitude is found as one of the factors affecting learners in selecting
what kind of strategy they want to use during language learning. Hence, the
investigation of attitude within this research involves those five learning factors as
well.
Considering that Competence-based Learning in Indonesia has been
implemented for more than ten years, English educational research on attitude
which were published within the last ten years should represent the development
of attitude in broad meaning rather than narrow meaning. Therefore, this research
is intended to find out how far English educational research on attitude and related
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
learning factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning
strategy have represented Competence-based Learning, particularly concerning
the concept of attitude as practiced in 2013 Curriculum.
B. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Competence-based Learning has been implemented in English education
in Indonesia for more than ten years. The implementation of this approach
generates the emergence of three competences namely attitude, skills and
knowledge. Therefore, a large number of research in English education had been
conducted on these three competences. The numerous number of research on
these three topics leads to the emergence of certain trends.
Unfortunately, there is a limited number of research investigating the
trends of research in English education. Particularly, in terms of attitude, in which
two different concepts exist. The first concept is attitude in general which
classifies attitude into positive and negative (attitude in narrow meaning). Another
concept is attitude in Competence-based Learning which differentiates attitude
into spiritual and social (attitude in broad meaning). Whereas, discovering the
trends can provide information on the current interest as well as the development
or progress of English education. Indeed, decision making and even an adjustment
can be made through utilizing the results of trends. These are attempted to
improve English education so that it will become more effective and better quality
can be achieved.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
C. SCOPE OF THE STUDY
Due to the limited time and access to the data sources, some limitations are
determined. First, the limitation is related to the topic of the research reports being
analyzed. This research focuses only on analyzing research reports which deal
with attitude and related learning factors such as motivation, belief, perception,
learning style and learning strategy in English education. Second limitation is on
the year of publication. The researcher only analyzes research reports which were
published in 2007 to 2016. Third limitation is on the origin of the research reports.
The researcher wants to analyze research reports originated from Indonesia as the
main focus. However, she also takes several others from Expanding-Circle
Countries (ECC), Outer-Circle Countries (OCC) and Inner-Circle Countries
(ICC). The researcher analyzes 100 research reports in which eighty of them are
originated from Indonesia, ten of them are from ECC and five from each of OCC
and ICC.
D. PROBLEM FORMULATION
This sections presents the problem of this research which is formulated
into one research question. The question is what are the trends of research on
attitude and related learning factors in English education?
E. RESEARCH GOALS
The main goal of this research is to discover the trends of research on
attitude and related learning factors in English education. This goal can be
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
achieved through investigating the content of research reports which covers
investigated topic, concept clarification of the topic being analyzed, related topic,
origin, participant, goal, method, data gathering instrument, data analysis
technique, sampling technique, validation technique and result. Moreover, this
information leads to the relation between research trends on attitude and related
learning factors in English education and Competence-based Learning as the
current approach in English education, particularly concerning the concept of
attitude as practiced in 2013 Curriculum.
F. RESEARCH BENEFITS
This research provides both scientific and practical benefits. The scientific
benefit of this research offers a description of research trends on attitude and
related learning factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and
learning strategy in English education. Besides, it also provides a description of
the relation between the research trends and the concept of attitude in
Competence-based Learning, particularly as practiced in 2013 Curriculum.
The practical benefits are attempted for several parties such as educators,
students, English educational researchers, university managers, and policy makers
of English education. First, for both educators and students, the results can help
them to understand more about attitude and five related learning factors
(motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy) in English
education. Second, for English educational researchers, the results of this research
provide them with more up-to-date information on attitude and five related
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
learning factors which have been investigated, particularly concerning the concept
of attitude in Competence-based Learning as practiced in 2013 Curriculum. Third,
the university managers and policy makers of English education can utilize the
results of this research as a source to develop a quality control in conducting
research so that the students and future researchers will conduct research on the
other unexplored topics. This will result in more contribution to the development
of English education, particularly in the context of Competence-based Learning.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter aims to clarify the concepts of the research. It discusses both
main and supporting theories used within this research. It consists of three main
sections which entail several sub-sections. The sections are theoretical review,
related studies, and theoretical framework.
A. THEORETICAL REVIEW
In this section, the researcher explains some theories employed in this
research. Those are Competence-based Learning, attitude, English learning
factors, English educational research reports, classification area of English, and
content analysis.
1. Competence-Based Learning
The notion of Competence-based Learning (CBL) has been widely known
for its emergence which brings some changes in education realm. This part
discusses the history and overview and its implementation in Indonesia.
a. History and Overview
The history of Competence-based Learning (CBL) can be traced back to
the early 1970s when Competency-based Education (CBE) emerged for the first
time in the United States. CBE itself refers to “an educational movement that
advocates defining educational goals in terms of precise descriptions of the
knowledge, skills, and behaviors students should possess at the end of a course of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
study” (Richards and Rodgers, 2001: 141). In other words, it focuses on the
outcomes or outputs of learning rather than the means of learning.
CBL according to Richards and Rodgers (2001) is the implementation of
CBE principles in language teaching. It seeks to teach language in relation to the
social contexts in which the language is used. Hence, the focus of learning has
shifted from what the students know to what they can do with the language. In
broader context, Sánchez and Ruiz (2008) assert that CBL is an approach to
teaching and learning which focuses on the competences that students need to
develop. O’Sullivan and Burce (2014: 3) define CBL as “a way of structuring
learning activities so that the individual learner can meet a predetermined set of
competencies”. Therefore, it can be concluded that CBL is an outcome-based
approach to education which focuses on the competences that the students should
possess at the end of learning.
Sánchez and Ruiz (2008:33) highlight that “to have CBL, it is a must to
establish what competences are essential in today’s world”. Richards and Rodgers
(2001: 144) assert that “competencies in CBL consist of a description of essential
skills, knowledge and attitudes required for effective performance of a real-world
task or activity”. Therefore, the goal of this CBL approach as stated is “to endow
students with knowledge and to enable them to apply such knowledge in various
contexts” (Sánchez and Ruiz, 2008: 33). Indeed, it can be done by developing
students’ knowledge, along with skills, attitude and (character) values which are
integrated.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
b. The Implementation of Competence-Based Learning in Indonesia
In Indonesia, the implementation of CBL can be seen through the
curriculum. There are three curricula which employ CBL: (1) Competency-based
Curriculum (CBC) which was initiated in 2004, School-Level Curriculum (SLC)
which was begun in 2006, and 2013 Curriculum as the latest curriculum (Subandi,
2014). CBC contains a set of planning and organization of competence to achieve
national goal in adjustable environment and school potency (Department of
National Education, 2004, in Subandi, 2014). SLC is operational curriculum
which is arranged and performed by each unit of school (Management of Director
General of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2009, in Subandi, 2014).
Meanwhile 2013 Curriculum according to Yulia (2014) is the continuation and
improvement of the previous curricula (CBL and SLC) which focuses on the
competences as well as character building in order to achieve the goal of national
education.
In regard to CBL, it can be stated that 2013 Curriculum (as the current
curriculum in Indonesia) has emphasized each competence in more specific. Thus,
the implementation of CBL in Indonesia can be best viewed from this curriculum.
Tantra (2015) states that 2013 Curriculum is designed to respond the change of
learning paradigm in today’s education from teacher-centered to learner-centered.
Moreover, this 2013 Curriculum is also in line with the goal of national
education. As stated in the Article 3, Constitution No. 20 Year 2003, the goal of
national education is to develop the students’ potential to become a faithful, god-
fearing, morally good, healthy, knowledgeable, skillful, creative, autonomous
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
person as well as a democratic and responsible citizen (cited in Kerangka dasar
dan struktur kurikulum 2013). This goal encompasses several competences which
can be differentiated into the following classification.
Table 2.1: The Classification of National Education Goals
Attitude
a. Spiritual attitude
Appreciating and internalizing the embraced religion
b. Social attitude
Having good moral, healthy, independent, democratic and
responsible
Knowledge Knowledgeable
Skills Skillful and creative
Source: Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum 2013
From the table it is clear the goal of national education is also focused on
the three competences (attitude, knowledge and skills) which should be possessed
by the students. The focus of 2013 Curriculum as emphasized by Mulyasa (2014)
is also to develop students’ competences (attitude, skills and knowledge) and
characters. In addition, as 2013 Curriculum is intended to build both of students’
soft ad hard skills, therefore the implementation of the three competences in
teaching-learning process should be balance.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
Figure 2.1: Three Competences of 2013 Curriculum
(Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum 2013, 2013)
Figure 2.1 presents the stages that should be achieved by each level of
education within the context of the three competences. Different from the
previous curriculum (SLC) which used merely Bloom’s taxonomy for knowledge
competence, 2013 Curriculum has employed Krathwohl’s taxonomy for attitude,
Dyers’ taxonomy for skills and Bloom’s taxonomy for knowledge as well. In
terms of attitude, the stages in teaching-learning process begin with accepting,
which is followed by responding, valuing, organizing or internalizing and
characterizing or actualizing as the highest phase. Skills comprise observing,
questioning, experimenting, associating, and communicating as the highest stage.
Meanwhile, knowledge entails knowing/remembering as the lowest phase,
understanding, applying, analyzing, the highest phase is evaluating. However,
when the students have achieved the highest phase of skills and knowledge, they
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
are expected to be able to create, though this is intended for higher education
level. These stages are then termed as scientific approach.
Table 2.2: The Graduate Competence Standards of 2013 Curriculum
Competence Standard
Attitude
- Having behavior that reflects a good attitude
- Pious, having good deeds, self-confident, and responsible for the
social and natural environment
- Positioning oneself as a reflection of the nation in the
international world
Skills
- Having thinking abilities and effective and creative actions in
both abstract and concrete contexts
- Having developed skills taught at school based on students’
talents, interests, and abilities
Knowledge
- Having procedural and metacognitive knowledge in science,
technology, arts, culture, and humanities with a national
perspective
- Having knowledge about the cases of phenomena and events
along with alternative solutions, hindrances, and final solutions
(Konsep dan implementasi kurikulum 2013, 2014)
Considering the goal of national education and the fact that CBL is an
outcome-based approach, therefore, at the end of the learning, the students are
expected to pass the graduate competence standards presented in Table 2.2. In
terms of attitude, students have to possess good attitude of both spiritual and
social. For skills, the students are expected to be skillful and creative so that they
will be able to perform well. Indeed, they should have good abilities. Meanwhile
for knowledge, the students are expected to be knowledgeable (factual, conceptual
and procedural). It means that they should understand both science and
phenomena so that they will be able to solve problems with the support of enough
knowledge. In short, the students are expected to be people with good attitude,
character, skills and knowledge as well.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
2. Attitude
The terms attitude is widely used in education, along with skill and
knowledge. Therefore, having clear understanding about the meaning of this terms
and its influences towards English language learning is essential. However, the
emergence of attitude in Competence-based Learning, particularly in 2013
Curriculum leads to the different meaning of attitude which is broader.
a. Narrow Meanings
In general, Eagly and Chaiken (1993, as cited in Albarracín, Johnson and
Zanna, 2005: 4) define attitude as “a psychological tendency that is expressed by
evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favor or disfavor”. However,
when it comes to language learning, the terms attitude, according to Crytal (1997)
refers to the feelings people have about language. Hence, it describes their
behavior towards their own language or the languages of others. Moreover,
Pickens (2005: 44) defines attitude as “a complex combination of things we tend
to call personality, beliefs, values, behaviors and motivations”.
Eagly and Chaiken (1998, as cited in Jain, 2014) state that attitude is
constructed of three components: (1) affective, (2) behavior, and (3) cognitive.
These components are known as ABC model of attitude. Affective component
deals with feeling or emotional response (liking or disliking) towards an object of
attitude. Behavior component is the tendency to act in certain ways (favorable or
unfavorable) toward an object of attitude. Cognitive component refers to an
individual’s thought, belief, perception, opinion, and idea about the object of
attitude. It can be belief or disbelief.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
The formation of attitude is influenced by various factors from both
internal and external. One of the factors is motivation. Deci and Ryan (2000, in
Despagne, 2010) highlight that attitude can be created by extrinsic and/or intrinsic
motivation. For instance, in the context of language learning, when a learner has
high motivation, she or he tends to hold good attitude. Furthermore, Pickens
(2005: 47) asserts that “attitude formation is a result of learning, modeling others,
and individual’s direct experiences with people and situations”. In addition,
Dӧrnyei (2003, in Despagne, 2010) also states that attitude is created and can be
changed through four factors namely family, teacher, peer and school. When an
individual interact with others, she or he can be affected by others and vice versa.
In short, considering that it is influenced by various factors, individual’s attitude
can also vary.
Walley et al. (2009, Jain, 2014) mention that attitude is generally positive
or negative. As they believe that attitude is judgement which means that it is a
view of an object (person, place, thing, or event). However, sometimes people
may also have neutral attitude. Gardner (1985) mentions that there are two types
of attitude in language learning: (1) attitude toward learning the language, which
is relevant to educational attitude and (2) attitude towards the language
community which is relevant to social attitude. Educational attitude includes
attitude towards teacher, the course, and learning the language. Social attitude, on
the other hand, focuses on the cultural implication of second language acquisition
(SLA). Gardner believes that these two types of attitude influence the
achievement in second language learning. However, he claims that attitude
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
towards learning the language is more closely related to achievement than attitude
towards the second language community.
b. Broad Meanings
The broad meaning of attitude emerges from the implementation of
Competence-based Learning (CBL) as the current education system in Indonesia.
Due to the implementation of 2013 Curriculum (as the current curriculum in
Indonesia), attitude has received more attention. This is because 2013 Curriculum
is intended to achieve the goal of Indonesian national education which emphasizes
attitude and character, along with skills and knowledge. Based on Article 3,
Constitution No. 20 Year 2003, the goal of national education is to develop the
students’ potential to become a faithful, god-fearing, morally good, healthy,
knowledgeable, skillful, creative, autonomous person as well as a democratic and
responsible citizen (cited in Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum 2013).
Derived from this goal, the terms attitude is divided into spiritual and social.
Spiritual attitude deals with individuals’ attitude related to their religion in which
they have to appreciate and internalize the embraced religion. Meanwhile, social
attitude refers to individuals’ attitude within the society which define how they
interact and behave with others. Hence, they should have good moral, be healthy,
independent, democratic and responsible.
As CBL is an outcome-based approach, at the end of the learning,
Indonesian students are expected to fulfil the graduate competence standard.
Ministry of Education and Culture (2014) had determined the graduate
competence standard for attitude as follows: (1) Having behavior that reflects a
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
good attitude, (2) Pious, having good deeds, self-confident, and responsible for
the social and natural environment, and (3) Positioning oneself as a reflection of
the nation in the international world.
In addition, as highlighted by Mulyasa (2014) that the focus of 2013
Curriculum is on developing students’ competences and characters. Hence, The
Ministry of Education and Culture has formulated eighteen character values that
should be integrated into lessons. These eighteen character values are derived
from both spiritual and social attitudes. Through these values, the students are
expected to have good characters along with good competences (attitude, skills,
and knowledge). The values and their description are presented in the following
table.
Table 2.3: Values of Cultural Education and National Character of 2013
Curriculum
No. Value Description
1 Religious
An obedient attitude and behavior in applying
religious teachings, tolerant towards the practices of
other religions and beliefs, and in harmony with
people having different religions.
2 Honest
Attitudes based on one’s effort to make oneself a
person who is trustworthy in speech, action, and
work.
3 Tolerant
Attitudes and actions that respect religions, ethnicity,
opinions, attitudes, and actions those are different
from one’s own.
4 Disciplined Orderly and conforms actions to all the rules and
regulations.
5 Hardworking A tenacious behavior in overcoming difficulties and
in completing learning tasks.
6 Creative Thinking before doing something to discover new
ways or results from what one has at one’s disposal.
7 Independent Attitudes and behaviors that do not depend on other
people in completing assignments.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
Table 2.3: Values of Cultural Education and National Character of 2013
Curriculum (cont.)
No. Value Description
8 Democratic
A way of thinking, behaving, and acting which views
one’s rights and obligations as equal to those of
others.
9 Curious Attitudes and action that generally seeks to discover
more about what one learns, observes, and listens.
10 Nationalistic
A way of thinking, acting, and viewing that places
national interests higher than personal or communal
interests.
11 Patriotic
A way of thinking and doing that reflects faithfulness,
care, and respect for the national language, along with
the land, social, economic, and political aspects of the
community.
12 Appreciative of
achievement
Attitudes and actions of encouraging oneself to
produce something useful of the society while also
acknowledging what others do.
13 Friendly,
communicative
Actions that demonstrate an eagerness to converse,
interact, and cooperate with other people.
14 Peace loving Attitudes, speech, and actions that cause other people
to feel happy and secure due to one’s presence.
15 Fond of reading
The habit to provide time for reading various
materials to learn insights and other virtues for
oneself.
16 Environmentally
aware
Attitudes and actions that generally seek to prevent
damage in the natural environment and to make
efforts to repair environmental damage that has
occurred.
17 Socially
concerned
Attitudes and actions that tend to assist other people
who need help.
18 Responsible
Attitudes and behaviors that assume the obligation to
finish assignments and tasks and to take care of
oneself, the society, the environment (nature, social
and culture), the country, and God.
(Ministry of Education and Culture in Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya
Dan Karakter Bangsa, 2010: 9-10)
Different from the narrow meaning of attitude which divides attitude
solely into positive and negative, the terms attitude in CBL based on 2013
Curriculum is broader. It covers both spiritual and social attitudes which can be
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
differentiated into the eighteen character values as presented in Table 2.3. This
discussion explains why the terms attitude within this study is divided into narrow
and broad meaning.
c. Attitude toward English Language Learning
Attitude towards English language learning has become an interesting
issue in many countries. As discussed by Bartram (2010) there is still a perception
that English native speakers have less good attitude and low motivation to learn
English. Meanwhile, in countries in which English is seen as a second language
(L2), different attitude is shown. English learners in Netherlands and Germany,
for instance, tend to show more positive attitude and higher motivation to learn
English. As leaners hold different perceptions when they are learning English, it
results in this contrast situation.
Indeed, teachers’ attitude in English language learning should not be
neglected. Along with learners’, teachers’ attitude should also be considered as
they play a significant role. Therefore, the explanation of attitude toward English
language learning entails both learners’ and teachers’ attitude as well.
Leaners’ Attitude
In second or foreign language leaning, attitude towards learning situation
is believed as a crucial factor that contributes and even plays an important role
(Susandi and Khaerudin, 2015). Attitude towards the learning situation according
to Susandi and Khaerudin (2015) refers to learners’ reaction or perception to
anything associated with the context in which the language is taught”. If the
learners hold positive attitude, they tend to enjoy the learning process and are able
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
to perform better and achieve greater. Bidin, Jusoff, and Azis (2009) have
revealed that there is a relation between attitude and language learning
achievement. Their study has discovered that learners with higher achievement are
those who have positive attitude. Similarly, Ahmed (2015) points out that:
Learners’ attitudes play a significant role in maximizing learning and
teaching output. Learners’ attitude can be defined as a collection of
feelings regarding language use and its status in the society. The feelings
are good, bad and neutral. They can nurture or hinder the learning process
effectively (p. 1).
Each learner has his or her own perspective towards English language
learning which is considered as a part of individual differences. In response to
such situation, realizing their attitude will help the teachers to adjust their way of
teaching so that the objective of learning can still be achieved. Therefore, having
good attitude during the language learning process is necessary.
Teachers’ Attitude
Baker’s research (1992, in Bartram, 2010) reveals that environmental
variables affect the construction of learners’ attitude in language learning. The
environmental factors can be seen both from the situation in which the learners
involve in and the interaction of the people surround them such as teachers,
classmates or friends, and parents. Among these people, teachers are viewed to be
the most significant factor as they are the first who interact and teach directly to
the leaners in the classroom context. They somehow determined whether or not
the learners enjoy the English language learning, along with the teaching methods,
materials and media. These statements are supported by Clark and Trafford (1995,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
as cited in Bartram, 2010: 44) who found out that “teachers themselves shared
pupils’ views on the importance of the teacher-pupils’ relationship, with teachers
in their research claiming it to be the most significant variable affecting pupils’
attitudes towards languages”.
Wright’s research (1999, in Bartram, 2010) also reveals that learners’
attitude in language learning are influenced by their teachers. Another supporting
finding comes from Fisher’s study on leaners’ perception towards teacher in
foreign language learning (2001, in Bartram, 2010) which states that teachers in
foreign language learning is more important than in other subjects.
In addition, Woodcock (2013) states that teacher’s attitude also gives
significant influence on students’ classroom performance. Negative attitude can
lead to low expectation of learners which results in the reduction of opportunities
for them to learn. On the other hand, positive attitude of the teacher can enhance
opportunities for the learners. Woodcock (2013) further claims that the influence
of teacher’s attitude is powerful. Therefore, it is a must for the teachers to pay
attention to their attitude when they are teaching. These are the evidences that
explain why teachers play a significant role in English language learning, in terms
of attitude. Therefore, both learners’ and teachers’ attitude towards English
language learning are crucial as they related one another.
d. Attitude and Related Learning Factors
Considering that attitude is a part of individual’s learning factor, hence, it
is commonly found to have a relation to other learning factors. Susandi and
Khaerudin (2015) mention that attitude and motivation are correlated.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
Furthermore, Gardner (1985, in Susandi and Khaerudin, 2015) asserts that
students’ positive attitude towards their second language teacher is related to their
motivation and achievement in class. Similarly, Despagne (2010) emphasizes that
positive and negative attitude which has been created through the perception
influences the motivation of the language learning process. Therefore, the terms
attitude and motivation usually go together because they have close relationship.
Along with motivation, perception is also closely related to attitude
(Bahamonde-Birke, Kunert, Link and Ortúzar, 2015). It affects attitude through
cognitive side. As Eagly and Chaiken (1998, in Jain, 2014) highlighted that
cognitive component of attitude involves individual’s belief, therefore, it can be
stated that belief affects attitude in similar way as perception. Furthermore, Riley
(1989, in Despagne, 2010: 5) mentions that “attitude depends on the individual’s
perception of ethno linguistic reality. It means that a learner’s behavior as a
member of a group and with respect to other groups, will vary according to his or
her belief about the linguistic situation, and language learning is crucial aspect of
that behavior”.
Other learning factors which have a relation to attitude are learning style
and learning strategy. Caliskan and Kilinc (2012) state that learning style is inborn
character learning factors. Hence, it affects individual’s attitude. Their study also
reveals that learning style and attitude has a positive and medium relation.
Regarding to learning strategy, attitude is found as one of the factors affecting the
learners in selecting what kind of strategy they want to use (Oxford, 1990, in
Msuya, 2016). In short, motivation, belief, perception, learning style and learning
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
strategy are five learning factors which are commonly found to affect attitude and
vice versa.
3. English Learning Factors
The notion English learning factors here refers to five concepts namely
motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy which are
closely related to attitude (Hosseini and Pourmandnia, 2013). As mentioned in the
previous part, attitude is not a single learning factor. It involves motivation, belief,
perception, learning style and learning strategy as they are strongly related one
another. These learning factors are deemed to influence the emergence of certain
attitude within an individual. Therefore, the review of these concepts are also
related to attitude.
a. Motivation
In general, motivation refers to the desire to participate or get involved in
the learning process” (Lumsden, 1994). Bomia et al. (1997: 1) define motivation
as “willingness, need, desire and compulsion to participate in, and be successful in
the learning process”. Furthermore, Dӧrnyei and Ushioda (2011: 4) define
motivation as “the choice of a particular action, the persistence with it, the effort
expended on it which is responsible for why people decide to do something, how
long they are willing to sustain the activity and how hard they are going to pursue
it”. From these definitions, it can be inferred that motivation refers to the learners’
desire and willingness to take action within the learning process as an effort or
attempt to achieve the goal of learning.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
Motivation has a direct effect on language learning (Gomleksiz, 2010).
Lennartsson (2008, in Gomleksiz, 2010) mentions that motivation is a significant
factor in second language learning. Furthermore, Reece and Walker (1997) claim
that a less able learner who has high motivation can achieve greater success than
the more intelligent learner who has low motivation. In relation to attitude, De
Bot, Lowie and Verspoor (2005: 72) state that “a high motivation and a positive
attitude towards a second language help second-language learning”. Moreover,
Gardner and Lambert (1972) say that motivation to learn is determined by the
attitude towards language learning. They further mention that a positive attitude
will increase motivation. On the other hand, Deci and Ryan (2000, in Despagne,
2010) state that motivation affect the formation of attitude.
In relation to this research, motivation is viewed as a learning factor which
concerns on a willingness to do something in order to achieve the learning goal. It
affects and is affected by attitude. Thus, these discussions explain the relation
between attitude and motivation which is found to be closely related one another.
b. Perception
The terms perception as defined by Pickens (2005) refers to the results of
human’s interpretation towards things and events around them. Otara (2011: 1)
defines perception as “the way we all interpret our experiences”. Alfaruqy (2014)
states that perception can be simply defined as a process of interpretation of
things. Hulela, Kelebekae and Boipono (2016) describe perception as a
psychological concept on how people view the world around them.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
Perception is closely related to attitude (Pickens, 2005). Aviram and Tami
(2004, in Suratno, Murniati and Aydawati, 2014) state that individual’s perception
determines his or her attitude. Moreover, Alfaruqy (2014) mentions that
perception is affected by attitude and vice versa. Therefore, how people perceive
things and situations will affect their attitude towards those things and situations.
This brief explanation reveals how attitude and perception are correlated.
From these explanations, it can be inferred that perception in this research
refers to the educators’ and learners’ view towards teaching learning process and
the components within (such as teaching method, material, assessment,
instruction, and so on) which is resulted from their interpretation on those things.
It is also a part of attitude, particularly in terms of cognitive side.
c. Belief
The terms belief as defined by Murphy (2000: 16, in Steel, 2009: 3) refers
to “a complex and inter-related system of personal and professional knowledge
that serves as implicit theories and cognitive maps for experiencing and
responding to reality”. Bangou, Fleming and Goff-Kfouri (2011: 2) state that
“belief relies on cognitive and affective components and are often tacitly held”.
Therefore, it is clear that belief concerns on cognitive components.
In relation to attitude, Borg (2006, in Ozmen and Aydin, 2015) mentions
that attitude is constituted from belief. This is because belief is considered as a
component which determines attitude through cognitive side (Eagly and Chaiken,
1998, in Jain, 2014). Furthermore, Mokhtar (2015) points out that belief and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
attitude are important in understanding and improving educational processes.
These explains why belief and attitude are related one another.
In short, belief in this research refers to individual’s thought or view
towards an object. Belief is also a part of attitude, particularly in terms of
cognitive side. It explains why belief is involved in the investigation of attitude
within this research.
d. Learning Style
The theories of learning as stated by Brown (2000: 112) are attempted to
describe people’s way of learning in general, that is how they perceive, filter,
store and recall information. In the process of learning, each learner experiences a
certain problem which forms a particular attitude within the learner (individual
differences). As the learners encounter many different problems, it leads to the
emergence of various learning styles that differ across learners as well as learning
strategies that the learners used to overcome the problems. Oxford (2003)
mentions that both learning style and learning strategy are considered as the main
factors that determine the way and the outcome of learners’ language learning.
Along with other learning factors, learning style has emerged to be a part
of the discussion of attitude. Learning style is composed of strategies such as
superficial or deep processing of information, holistic and serial processing of
knowledge, processing knowledge in details, retention and systematic recalling
(Busato et al., 1998, in Ibrahimoglu, Unaldi, Samancioglu and Baglibel, 2013). In
the context of second language learning, Brown (2000) defines the terms style as
the tendencies or preferences within a learner. In other words, it is the learners’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
characteristics of intelligence as well as personality types or attitudes that differ
one learner to another. Ellis (2008: 660) asserts that learning style refers to “the
characteristics ways in which individuals orientate to problem solving”. He
further emphasizes that the focus of learning style is to describe how language
learners prefer to learn.
From early to recent research in second language, a number of learning
styles have emerged and found to affect the success of second language learning.
Ibrahimoglu, Unaldi, Samancioglu and Baglibel (2013) reveal that learning style
shows a linear relationship between academic achievements. In relation to
attitude, Caliskan and Kilinc (2012) state that learning style is inborn character.
Therefore, it affects individual’s way of behaving and perceiving something. In
other words, learning style in this research is considered a factor affecting the
formation of individual’s attitude, particularly through behavior side. Their study
also reveals that learning style and attitude has a positive and medium relation.
Therefore, the terms learning style in this research refers to a certain way that
leaners tend to use in learning English. It affects the formation of attitude through
behavior side.
e. Learning Strategy
The terms learning strategy as defined by O’Malley and Chamot (1990, in
Msuya, 2016) refers to special thoughts and behaviors that learners use to help
them in learning new language. Meanwhile, Brown (2000) states learning strategy
refers to methods to solve problems in learning language. Similarly, Ellis (2008)
describes learning strategy as method that learners employ in learning a second
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
language (L2). He further mentions that it is an attempt to develop learners’
competence in the target language. He also highlights that “learning strategy is
problem-oriented, which means that learners used the strategy to overcome the
problems they encounter in language learning.
Several factors are found to influence learners in choosing learning
strategy. As pointed out by Oxford (1990, in Msuya, 2016), the factors are
cultural background, attitude and belief towards the language, stage of learning,
gender, motivation and language learning task. Moreover, Ellis (2008) also
mentions that age appears to be one of the factors affecting the way learning
strategy is used. Through this discussion, the relationship between learning
strategy and attitude can be understood. It can be simply defined that learners’
attitude affects them in selecting which learning strategy they want to use in the
process of language learning to overcome the learning difficulties.
Learning strategy in this research refers to methods used by leaners to
overcome difficulties in learning English. Different from other four learning
factors which affect the formation of attitude and vice versa, learning strategy is
affected by attitude and does not affect attitude. However, it is still a significant
learning factor to be investigated along with attitude.
4. English Educational Research Reports
The term research report within this research refers to several forms of
research reports commonly found such as thesis, journal article and research
paper. Examining the content of research reports is necessary as it provides
information on the progress or development of education. As mentioned by Yates
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
(2004) a good research should contribute to the improvement of education. Hence,
such exploration is necessary to discover how far education has improved within a
specific period of time. To assist researchers in examining the research reports,
especially for those who obtained large data, a table consisting research attributes
can be employed.
The table should cover the attributes of research. Sozbilir (2016) as cited
in Gul and Sozbilir (2016) has developed paper classification form (PCF) which
consists of five sections: subject of the paper, research design or methods, data
collection tools, sample, and data analysis methods. The researcher within this
research has adjusted the paper classification form so that it becomes more
adaptive. As the results, twelve main categories are formulated. Those are (1)
concept clarification (2) origin, (3) investigated topic, (4) related topic, (5)
participant, (6) research goal, (7) research design and method, (8) data gathering
instrument, (9) data analysis instrument, (10) sampling technique, (11) validation,
and (12) result.
First, the classification of concept clarification of the issue being analyzed
is based on the concept clarification of the issue within the research reports. In
determining the classification of concept clarification, the researcher made a list
of concept clarification stated in the studied research reports and then make a
generalization through classifying the similar concept into one classification.
Second, the classification of origin is based on the classification area of
English discussed in the previous part. There are three areas namely Inner Circle
Countries (ICC), Outer Circle countries (OCC) and Expanding Circle countries
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
(ECC) in which the majority of countries in Asia, including Indonesia, belong to
this area. But, as the researcher wanted to focus more on Indonesia, she did not
categorize research reports conducted in Indonesia into ECC but Indonesia. It
aimed to highlight the focus of this research. In classifying the origin of the
research reports, the researcher will see from the area where those researches were
conducted.
Third, in terms of investigated topic, the researcher has used the theories
of attitude and related learning factors in determining the classification. They are
attitude itself, motivation, perception, belief, learning style, and learning strategy
and 18 character values of attitude in Competence-based Learning such as
honesty, creativity, and tolerance (it depends on what have been found from the
studied research reports). However, to get richer results, the researcher also put
other related topic as the fourth category. The classification will be based on what
the researcher found in the studied research reports.
Fifth category is participant. The types of participants involved in the
research (i.e. high school students, English teachers, lecturers, etc.). The
classification of this category will also be based on what the researcher found
within the studied research reports.
Sixth category is goal of the research. Considering the various goals that
will be found within the studied research reports, the researcher will make
generalization to classify them so that it will be easier to interpret. Firstly, she will
read each research report and make a list on the goal. Then, she will classify the
similar goal under one classification as the generalization.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
Seventh category is research design and method which can be broadly
categorized into quantitative, qualitative and mixed (the combination of both
quantitative and qualitative). Fraenkel and Wallen (2009) mention that
experimental, correlation and survey belong to quantitative. While content
analysis, ethnography, and historical research belong to qualitative. They also
mention mixed method and action research. Ary, Jacobs, Sorensen and Razavieh
(2010) make a clear distinction between the two. The quantitative method is
composed of experimental and non-experimental. While the qualitative method
consists of case study, content analysis, ethnography, grounded theory, historical,
narrative, and phenomenological. The classification of research design and
method are formulated based on the classification of those experts and what have
been found in the studied research reports.
Eighth category is data gathering instrument. It consists of several tools
which are commonly used to obtain data for both quantitative and qualitative
research. Ary, Jacobs, Sorensen and Razavieh (2010) have defined various data
gathering instruments such as field note, observation, interview, written response
(questionnaire), performance measures on and student’s information which can be
in the form of portfolio or work samples, and test. They also point out two
instruments used in educational research which aims at measuring the value,
namely achievement test and aptitude test. However, if the researcher finds other
instruments within the studied research reports, they will be put in the
classification as well.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
Ninth category is data analysis technique. It will be based on the analysis
techniques found from the studied research reports. Different from data analysis
technique in Sozbilir’s (2016, in Gul and Sozbilir, 2016) paper classification form
which classifies quantitative analysis merely into descriptive and inferential, the
researcher in this research will put every technique as a classification. It aims to
depict more precise information on the use of statistical techniques.
Tenth category is sampling technique which is determined based on two
types of sampling namely probability and nonprobability. Ary, Jacobs, Sorensen
and Razavieh (2010) differentiate between the two types of sampling. They
mention that random sampling, stratified sampling and cluster sampling belong to
probability sampling. While nonprobability sampling involves convenience
sampling, purposive sampling and quota sampling. These are the classification of
sampling techniques.
Eleventh category is validation. Validity and reliability are commonly
used for quantitative research as it always depends on measurement. According to
Ary, Jacobs, Sorensen and Razavieh (2010) both validity and reliability are
essential in developing and evaluating instruments. Meanwhile in qualitative
research, the researchers can use credibility, transferability, trustworthiness and
confirmability.
The last category is result. In determining the classification of research
results, the researcher will do the same procedure as in defining the classification
of research goals. She will make a list of results from each research report and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
then the similar results will be put under one classification. By doing so, it will
assist the researcher in interpreting the results of large number of research reports.
5. Classification Area of English
English has been widely used in throughout the world for some purposes.
Hence, the number of people learning English becomes greater. Indeed, it results
in the variety of English. Regarding to this issue, Kirkpatrick (2007) has
summarized some classifications on the area of English done by some scholars.
The classifications attempt to explain the differences in the ways English is used
in different countries. The classification of English can be distinguished through
its roles in language teaching. English in language teaching is viewed in three
different roles namely English as a native language (ENL), English as a second
language (ESL), and English as a foreign language (EFL). This explanation has
led to Kachru’s three circles of English. It is composed of Inner-Circle, Outer-
Circle and Expanding-Circle. His classification of area of English in the world is
considered as the most common one.
a. Inner-Circle Countries
English as a native language (ENL) according to Kirkpatrick (2007) can
be defined when English is used as the primary language and spoken by most of
the population. Therefore, the United Kingdom (UK), the United States (US),
Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Ireland are countries in which English is
spoken as the native language. These countries are then terms as Inner-Circle
countries. English within these countries is not only spoken for educational
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
purpose but it takes part in almost all fields in their people’s life. They use it for
daily language.
b. Outer-Circle Countries
This second classification as mentioned by Kirkpatrick (2007) is in
contrast to the first one. English in Outer-Circle countries is not the main
language. Nonetheless, it is still important as it is used for official language. In
other words, it is termed as English as a second language (ESL). The members of
this classification are likely to be the ex-colonies of the United Kingdom (UK) or
the United States (US) in the past. Therefore, they have historical role related to
the emergence of English in their countries. Outer-Circle countries consist of
Nigeria, Malaysia, India, the Philippines, Singapore, South Africa and Pakistan.
c. Expanding-Circle Countries
The last classification is Expanding-Circle. It encompasses countries in
which English is viewed as a foreign language (EFL). Indonesia is one of the
countries in Expanding-Circle which located in Asia. According to Honna (2005)
English has spread rapidly in Asia. It can be seen from the increasing number of
people learning English for wider communication. Therefore, English education
receives more attention. The role of English in Indonesia is more or less the same
with some countries in Asia and ECC which can be seen through its use in society
in general and business, politics, education and media in particular (Lauder,
2008). In his study, Lauder (2008: 9) mentions that “currently English is seen as
needed for development. It is needed for instrumental reasons, as a tool which
provides access to international markets, scientific knowledge and expertise”.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
Kirkpatrick (2007) mentions that many countries in Middle East such as
China, South Korea, Russia, Egypt and Japan are parts of this ECC. It is hard to
clearly mention the members of this Expanding-Circle for the reason that EFL
users spread all over the world. In short, those which do not belong to Inner-Circle
and Outer-Circle are considered to be parts of Expanding-Circle. Indeed, English
within these countries is not used or spoken in daily life. It is merely learned in
schools or certain courses. Therefore, the opportunity to practice using English is
very limited. It results in students who tend to have low motivation to use English
outside the classroom.
In relation to this research, this classification area of English is used as the
foundation in determining the area where the research reports were conducted.
Considering that the focus of this research is on research conducted in Indonesia,
therefore, other countries in ECC, OCC and ICC will contribute only in a small
number.
6. Content Analysis
The terms content analysis had firstly emerged by the 1940s (Waples and
Berelson, 1941, cited in Krippendorff, 2004). Since then, content analysis was
utilized as one of research methods used in many studies (Riffe, Lacy and Fico,
1998).
a. Definition and Function
Krippendorff (2004: 18) defines content analysis as “a research technique
for making replicable and valid inferences from texts”. As a research technique,
“content analysis allows the researchers to process the data texts which are
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
significant, meaningful, informative, and even representational to others”
(Krippendorfff, 2004: 41). It means that the texts being analyzed can be in the
forms of various things (not only written material) as long as they fulfill the
mentioned requirements. It can be images, maps, sounds, signs, symbols, and
even numerical records. He further highlights that content analysis is usually used
when the researchers want to discover the trends, patterns and differences of the
phenomena or data being analyzed. It is also commonly used in identifications,
evaluations and judgements.
Riffe, Lacy and Fico (2005) point out that the essence of content analysis
is to examine both the manifest and the latent content. The term manifest content
here refers to the results of counting. Therefore, the analysis of manifest content
will deal with the message which can be easily recognized and counted. In short,
manifest content is only the surface meaning. On the other hand, the analysis of
latent content is deeper as it will deal with the judgements, evaluations, and
interpretation of content.
In addition, Rose, Spinks, and Canhoto (2015: 1) mention that:
Content analysis can be applied to all kinds of written text such as
speeches, letters or articles whether digital or in print, as well as text in the
form of pictures, video, film or other visual media. It can be used to
examine both the manifest and the latent content of a text. Manifest
content refers to the visible, countable components of the message. Latent
content refers to the meaning that may lie behind the manifest content.
These definitions are useful as they provide an understanding of what is
actually meant by content analysis. Through the definitions, it can be concluded
that content analysis is a research method which focuses on revealing the meaning
of a text. Therefore, it is clear that the object of content analysis is termed as text.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
The text itself can be in the form of written and oral. As content analysis involves
a large number of data, therefore in analyzing the data, it is common to have data
reduction. The process of reducing the data is called coding in which the
researchers classify the data into fewer classifications. Through these
classifications a particular pattern of data being analyzed will appear as the result.
The result is called as manifest content. Meanwhile, when the researcher analyzes
the meaning behind the manifest content, the results of the analysis is called as
latent content. In short, it can be stated that manifest content focuses solely on the
surface, whereas latent content deals with deeper meaning. However, it must be
noted that “both manifest and latent content still require interpretation but the
interpretation vary in depth and level abstraction” (Graneheim and Lundman,
2004 in Rose, Spinks and Canhoto, 2015: 1).
b. Types
Content analysis, in terms of types, can be broadly categorized into
quantitative and qualitative (Rose, Spinks and Canhoto, 2015: 1). It can be seen
through the procedure of how the analysis is carried out. Quantitative content
analysis according to Rose, Spinks and Canhoto (2015: 3) shares many common
characteristics of quantitative research in general. As with other quantitative
approach, quantitative content analysis also involves hypothesis formulation as
the response to the research question. Moreover, the most visible characteristic of
quantitative approach is that the analysis process applies statistical or numerical
calculation. Nevertheless, quantitative content analysis has a distinctive
characteristic as well. What makes it different is the existence of a step called
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
developing coding scheme. It is a process of developing classification to classify
the data so that more understandable information can be achieved (Rose, Spinks
and Canhoto, 2015). Furthermore, Neuendorf (2002: 14) mentions that “the goal
of any quantitative content analysis is to produce counts of key categories,
measurements of the amounts of other variables”. It is clear that quantitative
content analysis emphasizes its focus on implementing measurement technique in
order to provide clear results. Hence, the presentation of analysis results involves
numerical explanation. By doing so, more accurate interpretation can be drawn.
The result of this quantitative content analysis can be stated as the manifest
content.
Qualitative content analysis, on the other hand, retains the strengths of
quantitative content analysis (Mayring, 2014). Like quantitative content analysis,
developing coding scheme also exists in this qualitative content analysis.
However, according to Rose, Spinks and Canhoto (2015) there is no statistical
analysis involved in this approach. The goal of qualitative content analysis
according to Mayring (2014) is to provide rich and deep meaning of a text. This is
considered as the latent content. In terms of presentation, the analysis result is
usually displayed verbally.
In addition, the use of both quantitative and qualitative techniques in
content analysis has become more common. According to Drisko and Maschi
(2016) the basic of content analysis involves both qualitative and quantitative
techniques. The qualitative technique can be seen through a step called coding
unstructured data. Meanwhile the quantitative technique can be seen through the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
use of descriptive statistics to analyze the coded data. As highlighted by Creswell
(2011, in Drisko and Maschi, 2016) that:
Mixed method research employs complete quantitative and qualitative
research studies within a project to gain different perspectives on the study
question. Content analysis may combine qualitative and quantitative
techniques into a single study method. It is more of a hybrid or blended
research methodology than a true form of mixed methods research
combining separate qualitative and quantitative studies (p. 13).
Therefore, it is clear that these two techniques can be employed together
within a content analysis research. The use of both techniques in a research can
enrich the research findings. This explains the nature of qualitative and
quantitative techniques in content analysis.
c. Procedures of Conducting Content Analysis
As a research method, content analysis involves a set of procedures. Some
experts have proposed different steps in conducting content analysis research.
However, as highlighted by Fraenkel and Wallen (2009: 474) that “all procedures
that are called content analysis have certain characteristics in common. These
procedures also vary in some respects, depending on the purposes of the analysis
and the type of data being analyzed”. The framework of conducting content
analysis can be seen through the following figure.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
Figure 2.2: A Framework of Content Analysis
(Krippendorff, 2004: 30)
The framework illustrates the procedure of conducting content analysis.
The first thing to be considered is the text (the data of the research) to be
analyzed. Once the researchers have acknowledged the text, they must formulate
the research question that is the purpose of analyzing the text. Through the
research question, the instruments to collect the data can be determined. The next
step is describing the context. “In a content analysis, the context explains what the
analyst does with the texts, it could be considered the analyst’s best hypothesis for
how the texts came to be, what they mean, what they can tell or do”
(Krippendorff, 2004: 33). The next step is analytical construct. It presents how the
researchers have recognized the context. This step demands them to explain how
the text relate to the possible answer of the research question. Once the analysis is
done, the researchers should make inference based on the result of the analysis.
“Any content analysis should be validatable in principle” (Krippendorff, 2004:
39). It explains why the researchers in content analysis should conduct validation
within their research. It aims at strengthening the research findings.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
Fraenkel and Wallen (2009) further summarize the steps involved in
content analysis as follows: (1) Determining objectives, (2) Defining terms, (3)
Specifying the unit of analysis, (4) Locating relevant data, (5) Developing a
rationale, (6) Developing a sampling plan, (7) Formulating coding categories, (8)
Checking reliability and validity, (9) Analyzing data, and (10) Interpreting the
result of analysis.
Wimmer and Dominick (2011) define the steps of content analysis into the
following stages: (1) Formulating a research question, (2) Defining the universe,
(3) Selecting an appropriate sample from population, (3) Selecting and defining a
unit of analysis, (4) Constructing the categories of content to be analyzed, (5)
Establishing a quantification system, (6) Training the coders and conducting a
pilot study (7) Coding the content according to established definitions, (8)
Analyzing the collected data, and (9) Drawing conclusions and searching for
indications. A common way to interpret content analysis data is through the use of
frequencies (i.e., the number of specific incidents found in the data) and the
percentage and/or proportion of particular occurrence to total occurrence.
The review on the procedures of content analysis has provided the
researcher with sufficient information. Though there are some differences, it can
be seen that they share similar characteristics. In short, like any other research
designs, content analysis should begin with research question which is considered
to be the objective of the research. This research question determines the
researchers in selecting the instruments to collect and analyze the data. Sampling
technique is necessary to be employed. The researchers should clearly define the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
population, sample of the data, and sampling technique they use. The next step is
coding. It is considered as one of the characteristics that content analysis has.
Before analyzing the data, validation should be conducted. Then, it comes to the
analysis. After finishing the analysis, the last step the researchers should do is
concluding the results of the analysis.
B. RELATED STUDIES
The researcher had found four previous studies which focused on
examining research trends from English educational research reports. They also
employed content analysis as the research method. However, they focused only on
finding the manifest content, that is the result of counting the occurrences. They
did not discuss the relation between those research trends with the implemented
approach or curriculum. In other words, they did not analyze the latent content.
First, a study conducted by Hussein (2015) on 103 journal articles which
were published in 2008 to 2013 from The Journal of Teaching English with
Technology revealed that most of them were published in 2012 (24 journal
articles) and 2011 (23 journal articles) with English Language Teaching as the
most studied topic (38 journal articles). Most of them (68 journal articles) were
written by one author. The majority of sample group used in the journal articles
was student (42 journal articles) with two people as the dominant number of
sampling (32 journal articles). Most of the journal articles employed online
interaction (20 journal articles) and questionnaire/survey (20 journal articles) as
the data collecting instrument. Qualitative research was found as the most
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
dominant analysis technique as it was used in 58 journal articles. In terms of
reference, 61 journal showed the use of references between 1-29.
Second, Chaiyasook and Jaroongkhongdach (2014) conducted a study on
194 Thai master’s theses in ELT from 2003 to 2011. This study focused on
finding out the trends of research topic and method. It revealed that most ELT
master’s theses focused on student performance (60.82%), especially in
undergraduate level (25.64%). Most of them employed a human quantitative
research design (61.34%) by using students as a major of data source (80.41%).
The instruments used were mostly a combination of a questionnaire and a test,
meanwhile the analysis techniques used were mostly descriptive and inferential
statistics.
Third, Solak (2014) conducted a study on 189 research papers on foreign
language education in Turkey which were published between 2009 to 2013. Those
papers were indexed in SCCI and ULAKBIM. The instrument used in his research
was paper classification form which consists of subject matter, research
design/method, data collection tool, sampling, and data analysis method. The
findings revealed that the most studied topics on foreign language teaching and
learning were concept analysis, teaching and learning. The highest number of
articles were published in 2013 in which most of the authors were Turkish.
Quantitative method was the most used method within the studied papers. The
focus of sample group was mostly on undergraduates, meanwhile the sample size
was mostly between 31-100.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
Fourth, Lin and Cheng (2010) conducted a study on 493 TESOL master’s
theses in Taiwan from 2003 to 2007. Those theses were taken from the Electronic
Theses and Dissertations System of National Digital Library. This study focused
on finding out the educational levels of research context and research topics. The
findings showed that there were four most frequently investigated topics. Those
were: (1) language skills, including research on listening, speaking, reading,
writing, pronunciation, vocabulary, and grammar, (2) teaching methods or
approaches, (3) materials or curriculum and (4) computer assisted language
learning (CALL). The contexts found from the studied theses were: (a) high
school, (b) higher education, and (c) elementary school.
C. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Competence-based Learning (CBL) has been implemented in education
field for more than ten years. It is an approach which emphasizes on the mastery
of three competences namely attitude, skills and knowledge. Regarding to the
implementation of CBL, a large number of research in English education had been
conducted on these three competences. It resulted in the emergence of certain
trends. Among the three competences, the researcher wants to focus only on
attitude and related learning factors. Hence, this research focuses on investigating
the trends of research on attitude and related learning factors in English education.
Attitude in English language teaching and learning is commonly defined
as a way of behaving towards English language teaching and learning. It is shaped
by some factors such as past experience in learning the target language,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
surrounding people (e.g. teacher, classmates, parents, community), and several
related learning factors such as motivation, perception, belief and learning style. It
also affects learning strategy. Due to these relations, the focus of this research is
not only on attitude but also on these learning factors as well. In general, attitude
can be divided into two, positive and negative. This can be simply defined as
attitude in narrow meaning. However, attitude in Competence-based Learning is
different as it is divided into spiritual and social which covers eighteen character
values such as religious, honest, tolerant, etc. Therefore, it is termed as attitude in
broad meaning.
English educational research reports which were published in 2007-2016
are the data source in this research. In terms of topic, the researcher took only
those which deal with attitude and five related learning factors namely motivation,
perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy. For the origin, she had
taken research reports which were conducted in ECC (with Indonesia as the main
focus), ICC and OCC.
To answer the research question, first researcher examined the contents of
the collected research reports to discover the research trends. The contents consist
of investigated topic, concept clarification of the topic being analyzed, related
topic, participant, goal, method, data gathering instrument, data analysis
technique, sampling technique, validation technique and result. Then, she
interpreted the relation between research trends and Competence-based Learning,
particularly concerning the concept as practiced in 2013 Curriculum. Thus, the
framework of pre-understanding is presented in the following figure.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
Figure 2.3: Framework of Pre-understanding
Trends of Research on Attitude and Related Learning Factors in
English Education
English Educational Research Reports
Published in 2007 to 2016
Topics on attitude and related learning factors (motivation, perception,
belief, learning style and learning strategy)
80 were conducted in Indonesia, 10 from ECC, 10 from OCC and ICC
Content
Manifest Content (Research Trends)
Pre-determined Categories:
Investigated topic
Concept clarification
Related topic
Origin
Participant
Goal
Method
Data gathering instrument
Data analysis technique
Sampling
Validation
Result
Latent Content
The relation between research trends and the concept of
attitude in Competence based Learning as practiced in 2013
Curriculum
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter is intended to provide details explanation on how this
research was designed and conducted. It consists of several sections namely (1)
research goals and method, (2) nature and sources of data, (3) instruments, (4)
data gathering, (5) data analysis and presentation, and (6) validity.
A. RESEARCH GOALS AND METHOD
This research aims to reveal the trends of research on attitude and five
related learning factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and
learning strategy in English education. To achieve the goal, the researcher
investigated the content of English educational research reports which deal with
these topics. The content covers investigated topic, concept clarification of the
topic being analyzed, related topic, origin, participant, research goal, method, data
gathering instrument, data analysis technique, sampling technique, validation
technique and research result.
In attempt to achieve the goal, the researcher employs content analysis as
the research method. Rose, Spinks and Canhoto (2015) state that content analysis
is a research method which focuses on finding both manifest and latent content of
data. Manifest content refers to the results of counting the occurrence of data. As
it deals with numerical analysis, quantitative technique is applied. Latent content,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
on the other hand, is the meaning behind the manifest content. In other words, the
analysis involves interpretation in which qualitative technique usually deals with.
In short, this content analysis research employs both quantitative and
qualitative techniques. As claimed by Wimmer and Dominick (2011), the goal of
quantitative content analysis is an accurate representation of a large number of
meaningful data. Mayring (2000: 3) mentions that “qualitative content analysis
wants to preserve the advantages of quantitative content analysis for a more
qualitative text interpretation”.
Quantitative technique in this research was used to discover the research
trends. It was done by calculating the occurrences of research contents. The
results of this calculation is called manifest content. Meanwhile qualitative
technique was employed to reveal the relation between the research trends and
Competence-based Learning, particularly concerning the concept of attitude as
practiced in 2013 Curriculum. The analysis was carried out through interpreting
the research trends based on the theory of attitude in Competence-based Learning.
The result of this qualitative analysis is called latent content. Thus, trends of
research on attitude and related learning factors in English education concerning
the concept of attitude in Competence-based Learning can be best depicted
through this research method.
B. NATURE AND SOURCES OF DATA
The data sources of this research are English educational research reports
which are collected from open sources. Meanwhile the data of this research are
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
the content of the collected research reports which is text in nature. Moreover, to
obtain meaningful data, the researcher observed the collected research reports
directly through reading them one by one. Therefore, the nature of data within this
research is direct observation.
Due to the limitations of this research and large number of research which
have been conducted in English education, the researcher utilized stratified
random sampling in collecting the research reports. According to Krippendorff
(2004) stratified sampling enables the researchers to stratify the population into
several subpopulations. Then, it is followed by carrying out random sampling for
each subpopulation.
The limitations of this research are on topic, year of publication and origin
of the research reports. For the topic, the researcher took only those which deal
with attitude and five related learning factors namely motivation, perception,
belief, learning style and learning strategy. In terms of year of publication, she
took research reports which were published in 2007 to 2016. Meanwhile for the
origin, she took research reports which were conducted in ECC (with Indonesia as
the main focus), OCC and ICC. These limitations were used as the stratifications
in finding research reports from open sources. Then, random sampling was
applied in selecting the research reports which emerged after the implementation
of stratified sampling.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
C. INSTRUMENTS
The instrument in this research is the researcher herself. Prasad (2008)
states that researcher in content analysis is seen as an instrument to draw
inferences of data. Therefore, the main instrument in this study is the researcher
herself as she was the one who made the coding and inferred the meaning of the
of the data.
The basic principle of content analysis is objectivity where different
researchers can obtain the same results from the same data (Prasad, 2008). To
achieve the objectivity of the research results, the researcher used keywords to
find research reports as the data source and a table to manage the data. Reviewing
the theories of attitude and related learning factors resulted in these keywords:
attitude, belief, perception, motivation, learning style, learning strategy and 18
character values in Competence-based Learning (e.g. honesty, tolerance, religious,
etc.). These keywords were used to find the research reports from open sources.
D. DATA GATHERING
The process of data gathering within this research involves four steps.
First, collecting research reports from open sources by using keywords. In
collecting the research reports, the researcher utilized stratified random sampling
as this research has some limitations (i.e. topic, year of publication, and origin).
Second, reading the collected research reports one by one to understand the
content. Third, highlighting the important information such as the origin, topic
being analyzed, concept clarification of the topic, related topic, participant,
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
research goal, research design or method, data source, data gathering instrument,
data analysis technique, sampling technique, validation technique, and research
result. The last step is inputting the relevance contents of each research report into
the table as the data of this research.
The table used in this research is called Table of the Content of the
Investigated Research Reports. The table was designed by adjusting Sozbilir’s
(2016, in Gul and Sozbilir, 2016) paper classification form which consists of five
items namely subject of the paper, research design/method, data collection tool,
sample and data analysis method. In this study, the researcher added more items
in order to provide richer and more meaningful information of the studied
research reports. This table consists of twelve items namely concept clarification,
origin, investigated topic, related topic, participant, research goal, research
design/method, data gathering instrument, data analysis technique, sampling
technique, validation technique and research result as seen in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1: The Content of the Investigated Research Reports
Items Code Sub-
Items
Research Report
Number N %
1 2 3 … 100
Concept Clarification
Origin
Investigated Topic
Related Topic
Participant
Research Goal
Research Design/ Method
Data Gathering Instrument
Data Analysis Technique
Sampling Technique
Validation Technique
Research Result
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
As seen in Table 3.1, it consists of six columns. Items column consists of
twelve main categories of research content. Code column is the code for sub-items
(e.g. OR01, OR02, OR03 and OR04 for origin). Meanwhile sub-items column is
the specific information of each item (e.g. Indonesia, ECC, OCC and ICC for
origin). Therefore, in terms of origin the code OR01 is for Indonesia, OR02 is
ECC, OR03 is OCC and OR04 is ICC. The number in research report number
represents the investigated research reports. N column is the total occurrence of
sub-items in the form of number. Meanwhile the last column is also the total
occurrence of sub-items, however it is in the form of percentage. Therefore, it is
used in quantitative analysis. Through this table (see Appendix 2), the researcher
was able to discover the occurrence of the data from each item thoroughly.
E. DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
To answer the research question, the researcher calculated the occurrence
of data in Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports using
Microsoft Excel. It aims to discover the percentage of each item. This prior
analysis is termed as quantitative analysis. Therefore, the results of the analysis
are presented in charts and tables showing the percentage of data occurrence.
Then, they are followed by explanation.
Moreover, to provide richer findings, the researcher also analyzed the
relation between the research trends and the concept of attitude in Competence-
based Learning. This analysis is carried out through interpretation and without
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
involving any quantitative calculation, it is termed as qualitative analysis. Hence,
the results of the analysis are presented in the form of description.
F. VALIDITY
To make this research valid, both internal and external validity were
employed. According to Krippendorff (1980), internal validity in content analysis
is best labeled by the term “reliability”. Riffe, Lacy and Fico (2005) assert that
reliability in content analysis refers to an agreement among coders about
categorizing content (coding). Therefore, the researcher had discussed the coding
system along with two other researchers who conducted similar research to ensure
the appropriateness. Meanwhile Mayring (2014) states that the instruments in
content analysis are developed for a specific study and they have to be pilot tested
to achieve the reliability. Before employing the table, the researcher had
conducted a pilot study. The results of the pilot study revealed that the table was
able to assist the researcher in achieving the research goal. In other words, the
table used within this research had been tested and the result revealed that it was
appropriate to be employed as it measured what it was supposed to measure.
Hence, it explains how the internal validity within this research was achieved.
The terms external validity according to Ary, Jacobs, Sorensen and
Razavieh (2010: 292) refers to “the extent to which the findings of a study can be
generalized”. They further mentions that the generalizations from the studied data
to the unstudied data can be conducted by using sample in which it should
represent the larger population. As mentioned in the previous section, the data
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
sources of this research were taken from English educational research reports.
Some limitations were made on the topic (attitude and five related learning factors
namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy), year
of publication (2007 to 2016) and origin of the research reports (conducted in
ECC, OCC and ICC). Therefore, due to the limited time constrain and source, the
researcher had employed stratified random sampling in finding the research
reports. Through the implementation of the sampling technique, it is expected that
the collected research reports will represent other unobserved research reports so
that the results of this research can be generalized.
In short, internal validity deals with how well this research was conducted
so that the results can be more accurate. It was done through discussion among
three coders in determining the coding system. Besides, the table used in this
research was also piloted. Meanwhile external validity concerns on how the
results of this research can be generalized to other unexplored research reports. It
was done by using stratified random sampling. As this research has achieved both
internal and external validity, the results of this research can be defined as a
genuine research. It means that it reveals the real condition of the studied research
reports. Therefore, it can be used for decision making as it represents current
development of research on attitude and related learning factors in English
education.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter aims to present the answer of the research question which is
divided into two sections, namely analysis results and discussion. The first section
presents the results of the quantitative analysis thoroughly in the form of chart and
table which are followed by explanation. The second section presents the results
of qualitative analysis based on the theories.
A. ANALYSIS RESULTS
Before presenting the analysis results, the researcher wanted to firstly
mention the results of collecting the research reports as the data source of this
research. The research reports were collected from open sources by using
keywords. There are 100 research reports examined in this research. Using
stratified random sampling, those research reports were taken from TEFLIN
Proceedings 2014, TEFLIN Proceedings 2015, TEFLIN Proceedings 2016, RELC
Journal, TEFLIN Journal, English Education Journal, Indonesian Journal of
Applied Linguistics, Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra, Jurnal Dinamika Ilmu, Indonesian
Journal of English Education (IJEE), International Journal of English and
Education (IJEE), Jurnal Linguistika, Journal of Advances in Linguistics, English
Language Teaching (ELT) Journal, GALA Journal, Language Teaching Research
Journal, Journal of International Students and Australian Journal of Teacher
Education.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
To discover the trends of English educational research on attitude and five
related learning factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and
learning strategy which have been conducted in 2007 to 2016, the following
section presents the results of quantitative analysis. The results are based on the
contents of the studied research reports. The contents cover investigated topic,
concept clarification of the topic, related topic, origin, participant, research goal,
research design and method, data gathering instrument, data analysis technique,
sampling technique, validation technique and research result. To understand the
analysis better, the results are presented in the form of charts and tables and
followed by explanation.
1. Investigated Topic
The investigated topic found within the 100 research reports are presented
in the following figure. Several researches were found to examine more than one
topic. This explains why the total number of investigated topic is 115, meanwhile
the number of the studied research reports is 100. It points out that the topics are
related to one another. This notion is derived from the literature review presented
in Chapter II. Hence, these findings enhance and support the theories of attitude in
which it relates to other concepts such as those presented in Figure 4.2.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
Figure 4.1: Investigated Topics
Figure 4.1 illustrates the various topics of attitude and five related learning
factors in English education which have been investigated in 2007 to 2016. So far,
research on these areas have investigated eleven topics as presented in the figure
above. However, several topics namely motivation, perception and attitude
receive higher attention rather than others. Motivation was found in 26 researches
or 22.6% in which it appears as the most studied topic among 100 research
reports. It is followed by perception which was investigated in 25 researches or
21.7%. Attitude emerges in the third place as it had been examined in 23
researches or 20%. Belief, learning strategy and learning style are other learning
factors (related to attitude) which become the researchers’ interest in the field of
English education. There are 14 researches or 12.2% analyzing about belief.
20%
12.2%
22.6%
21.7%
6.1%
10.4%
0.9%
2.6%
1.7%
0.9%
0.9%
Attitude
Belief
Motivation
Perception
Learning Style
Learning Strategy
Confidence
Preference
Creativity
Honesty
Tolerance
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
Slightly different, learning strategy was found in 12 researches or 10.4%,
followed by learning style which was investigated in seven researches or 6.1%.
Other five issues which were found within the studied research reports are
considered as part of attitude, particularly confidence, creativity, honesty and
tolerance which belong to 18 character values of attitude in Competence-based
Learning. Although the number or research investigating those topics is still very
limited, however, it shows that research in attitude and other related learning
factors has developed. In a sequence, preference was found in three researches or
2.6%, creativity was found in two researches or 1.7%, meanwhile confidence,
honesty and tolerance, each of them was found in merely one research or 0.9%.
2. Concept Clarification of Attitude and Related Learning Factors
Literature or theoretical review is considered as a significant component in
a research. Providing a clear concept clarification on the subject being analyzed
will be beneficial for both the researcher and the readers. They will understand
what the subject is about. Therefore, misunderstanding can be avoided and better
understanding can be achieved.
Regarding to this research, as presented in Figure 4.1, there are 11 topics
found. To get deeper understanding on those topics, the concept clarifications
stated in the research reports are listed into the following table.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
Table 4.1 Concept Clarification of Attitude and Related Learning Factors in
English Education
Code Concept Clarification Total Percentage
(%)
CC01
Attitude is individual’s positive and negative cognitive
(belief, perception, thought, idea, opinion), affective
(feeling, emotion) and behavior (certain way of act,
response) towards something.
19 29.2
CC02 Attitude reflects individual’s spiritual (religious,
confident, etc) and social (tolerance, etc) character. 1 1.5
CC03 Motivation is an effort, willingness, desire to take
action in order to achieve a certain goal. 14 21.5
CC04 Motivation is a psychological construct determining the
success of language learning. 1 1.5
CC05 Motivation is effective strategy that could help learners
to develop their skills. 1 1.5
CC06 Belief is individual perception, opinion, thought, view,
idea, towards something. 8 12.3
CC07 Belief is linked to strategies that ones believe will work
in their teaching and learning. 1 1.5
CC08 Perception is individual’s belief, attitude, view and way
to act or perceive something. 6 9.2
CC09 Learning strategy is plan, step, technique, way, method
that is used to ease the learning process. 6 9.2
CC10 Learning style is individual’s preference, tendency,
specific way in language learning. 7 10.8
CC11 Tolerance is a kind personality to absorb the values of
different people (acceptance of others’ differences). 1 1.5
Total 65 100%
Table 4.1 presents the concept clarification of attitude and some related
learning factors found within the studied research reports. Unfortunately, 35 out
of 100 research reports did not provide the concept clarification of the topic being
analyzed. From the table it can be seen that there are 11 categories of concept
clarification. These categories were derived from seven topics namely attitude,
motivation, belief, perception, learning strategy, learning style, and tolerance. In
determining the categories, the researcher had made some generalizations as some
of them highlighted the similar concept.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
In terms of attitude, there are two different meanings found from the
studied research reports. CC01 is the meaning of attitude in narrow meaning,
meanwhile CC02 is the broad meaning of attitude (see Chapter II). As seen from
the table above, between the two meanings, CC01 dominates the findings. It was
found in 19 researches or 29.2% of occurrence. Meanwhile CC02 was found in
one research only. These findings indicate that there is a tendency for English
educational researchers to conduct research on attitude in narrow meaning rather
than broad meaning.
Concept clarification on motivation have been generalized into three
different classifications. CC03 seems to receive the largest result as it was found
in 14 researches or 21.5% of occurrence. The two other meanings, CC04 and
CC05, receive the same result with only 1.5% of occurrence. These findings
disclose that English educational researchers on motivation have similar view on
what is meant by motivation.
Two different meanings of belief were found within the studied research
reports. Yet again, the researchers who conducted research on belief showed
similar view about what is meant by belief in the context of English language
teaching and learning. CC06 dominates between two meanings of belief as it was
found within eight researches or 12.3% of occurrence.
As seen in the table, there is only one classification of meaning of
perception, learning strategy, learning style, creativity and tolerance. It can be
inferred that the researchers have similar understanding on the meaning of those
topics in the context of English language teaching and learning. CC10 was found
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
as the meaning of learning style in seven researches or 10.8% of occurrence.
Meanwhile CC08 about perception and CC09 about learning strategy receive the
same result as each of them was found in six researches or 9.8% of occurrence.
However, among 100 research reports, there is only one research which analyzed
about tolerance. Therefore, the occurrence of the meaning of tolerance is only
1.5%.
3. Related Topic
Figure 4.2: Related Topics
Figure 4.2 shows 11 topics in accordance with the investigated topics
presented in the previous Figure 4.1. Among 100 research reports studied, 70 of
them were found investigating more than one topic. Hence, it can be stated that
those researchers had tried to find the relation between attitude-related learning
30%
11.5%
8.6%
11.4%
8.6%
5.7%
2.9%
5.7%
7.1%
1.4%
5.7%
Learning-Teaching Method
Speaking
Writing
Reading
Listening
Vocabulary
Pronunciation
Grammar
Assessment
Anxiety
Test
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
factors and these 11 topics. As presented in the figure, the majority of the research
(21 researches or 30%) had analyzed about attitude and related learning factors
along with learning-teaching method. As seen in the figure, other related topics
receive low results. It can be articulated that learning-teaching method is the most
common topic to conduct research on (in relation to attitude and related learning
factors).
Other topics commonly found within the studied research reports are
English language skills and knowledge. Out of the four language skills, speaking
was found as the most common topic related to attitude and related learning
factors as it was investigated in nine researches or 12.9%. Reading is following
with only 1.5% difference as it was found in eight researches or 11.4%. Both
writing and listening receive the same result as each of them was found in six
researches or 8.6%.
In terms of English knowledge, vocabulary and grammar receive the same
result with 5.7% of occurrence as each of them was found in four researches.
Among three English knowledge found within the studied research reports,
pronunciation receives the smallest result with 2.9% of occurrence. It was found
in two researches only. Moreover, some researchers had tried to relate some topics
such as assessment, anxiety and test within the investigation of attitude and
related learning factors. There are five or 7.1%, out of 70 researches, which
analyzed about assessment. Meanwhile test was found in four researches or 5.7%
and anxiety was solely found in one research or 1.4%.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
4. Origin
It has been mentioned in the previous chapters that this study focuses on
research reports which were conducted in Indonesia, however, for a kind of
comparison purpose, several researches from other areas were also taken. Based
on the theory of classification area of English (see Chapter II), there are three
divisions. Those are Inner-Circle countries (ICC), Outer-Circle countries (OCC),
and Expanding-Circle countries (ECC) in which the majority of countries in Asia,
including Indonesia, belong to this division. Therefore, in collecting the research
reports, the researcher had used those three classifications. The distribution of the
research reports is presented in the following figure.
Figure 4.3: Origin of the Research Reports
Figure 4.3 presents the area of which the studied researches were
conducted. Through the figure it can be seen that the majority of the research on
attitude and related learning factors in English education were conducted in
80%
10%5% 5%
Indonesia ECC OCC ICC
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
Indonesia. Among 100 research reports, 80 of them were conducted in this
country. Meanwhile, 10% of the research were conducted in the area of
Expanding-Circle Countries (ECC). Using stratified random sampling, the ten
researches of ECC were found from Greece, Lebanon, Russia, Japan, Vietnam,
Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran. Among these eight countries, three researches
were conducted in Iran. Indeed, this division is dominated by Asian countries (as
explained in Chapter II). Furthermore, each of Outer-Circle Countries (OCC) and
Inner-Circle Countries (ICC) only contribute five researches due to the limited
research on attitude and related learning factors namely motivation, perception,
belief, learning style and learning strategy in English education conducted in these
areas. In OCC area, four researches were conducted in Malaysia and one research
was conducted in India. In ICC area, three researches were conducted in Australia,
meanwhile two others were conducted in USA and Canada.
5. Participant
To get an illustration on the current development of English education,
indeed, providing more relevant information is required. One possible way to
achieve such goal is through conducting research which involves participants (i.e.
teachers, lecturers, students from various levels of education) as many as possible.
In terms of participant, nine categories were found within the studied research
reports. It should be noted that several researches have more than one type of
participant. The findings are presented in the following figure.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
Figure 4.4: Participants
Figure 4.4 shows the types of participant found within the studied research
reports. As seen in the figure, English educational research on attitude and related
learning factors had involved various types of participant. Those researches have
been conducted on both teacher or lecturer and student from various level of
education. There are nine types of participant found from the studied research
reports. However, among the types of participants presented in Figure 4.4,
university student appears as the most common type of participant. Meanwhile,
other categories receive less than 20% of occurrence. Through the huge difference
it can be stated that there is a tendency of English educational researchers to
choose university student as the research subject instead of other types of
participant. English teacher which appear in 20 research reports or 18% of
occurrence and high school student which is found in 16 research reports or
14.4% of occurrence, are the next types of participant which become the
6.3%
14.4%
3.6%
46.8%
1.8%
18%
0.9%
4.5%
3.6%
Elementary School Student
High school Student
Vocational School Student
University Student
English Course Student
English Teacher
Native English Teacher
Pre-service Teacher
Lecturer
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
researchers’ preference. Furthermore, pre-service teacher, vocational high school
student, lecturer, English course student and native English teacher are five other
types participant which receive a low percentage of appearance and there is a
small difference in terms of result.
6. Research Goal
Goal is a crucial and inseparable component in conducting research.
Through research goal, readers will know what a research tries to achieve.
Furthermore, it somehow determines what kind of data the researcher should
obtain. Indeed, data types also determines what kind of instrument to use. In short,
providing clear goal in a research is necessary as it defines other research
attributes such as those mentioned.
Regarding to this research, considering the various investigated topics
presented in Figure 4.1 and related topics in Figure 4.2, indeed, the research goals
found from the 100 research reports also varied. Moreover, some of them were
found to have more than one research goal. However, it was also found that
several researches highlighted similar goals. Therefore, to make it easy to
understand, the researcher made some generalizations. The generalizations
resulted in several classifications of research goals which are presented in the
following table.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
Table 4.2: Research Goals
Code Research Problem/Goal Total Percentage
(%)
RG01
To find out the students’ attitude towards English
teaching and learning (motivation to learn English,
learning process, material, teacher, students, method,
assessment, test)
20 17.5
RG02 To find out the validity and reliability of attitude
assessment 1 0.9
RG03 To find out the implementation of teaching method in
improving students’ motivation to learn English 9 7.9
RG04 To know the participants’ motivation in learning English 9 7.9
RG05 To know the correlation among attitude, motivation and
English achievement 8 7.0
RG06
To know the participants’ belief towards English teaching
and learning (learning process, material, teacher, method,
assessment, test)
12 10.5
RG07 To find out the correlation among belief and learning
strategy, and classroom practices 3 2.6
RG08
To find out the participants’ perception towards English
teaching and learning (learning process, material, teacher,
task, method, assessment, test)
25 21.9
RG09 To find out students’ learning style in learning English 6 5.3
RG10 To know the correlation between learning style and
students’ English achievement 1 0.9
RG11 To find out the students’ strategy in learning English 12 10.5
RG12 To find out the use of teaching method to improve
students’ confidence in learning English 1 0.9
RG13 To find out students’ preferences in learning English
(language use and assessment) 2 1.8
RG14 To improve participants’ creativity in English teaching
and learning 2 1.8
RG15 To find out students’ tolerance in the context of English
teaching and learning 1 0.9
RG16 To find out students’ honesty in the context of English
teaching and learning 1 0.9
Total 114 100
The researcher had classified the research goals found from the studied
research reports into 16 categories which were derived from 11 investigated
topics. Three goals for conducting research on attitude are stated in RG01, RG02
and RG05. The majority of conducting research on attitude was to find out the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
participants’ attitude towards English teaching-learning and its components as
stated in RG01. It has 17.5% of occurrence.
The goals of research on motivation were also classified into three
classifications namely RG03, RG04 and RG05. However, the results demonstrate
that there is a small difference in terms of occurrence. Both RG03 and RG04
receive the same result with 7.9% of occurrence. Meanwhile RG05, as seen in the
table, receives 7% of occurrence.
The third topic is belief. There are two classifications of research goal for
this topic namely RG06 and RG07. Between these two goals, there is a large
difference of occurrence. RG06 was found as the most common goal within the
studied research reports on belief with 10.5% of occurrence. Meanwhile the
occurrence of RG07 is only 2.6%. Hence, the majority of English educational
research on belief tend to find out participants’ belief towards English teaching
and learning including its component as stated in RG06.
The fourth topic is perception. The goals of research on this topic could be
categorized into one category which is RG08. All of the studied research reports
on perception have similar goal which is to find out participants’ perception
towards English teaching-learning including its components. This research goal
has 21.9% of occurrence.
The fifth topic is learning style. Research goals on this topic were
categorized into two categorizations which are RG09 and RG10. Six among seven
researches on this topic have similar goal which is RG09. It receives 5.3% of
occurrence. Indeed, RG10 was found in one research only or 0.9% of occurrence.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
In short, most of them tended to find out students’ learning style in learning
English.
Sixth topic is learning strategy which has three classifications of goal
namely RG07, RG08, and RG11. RG11 dominates the result of occurrence among
the three goals. It has 10.5% of occurrence. Indeed, these results indicate that
there is a tendency of English educational researchers who conducted research on
learning strategy. They tended to conduct similar research that is to find out
students’ strategy in learning English.
In addition, considering the small number of research on several topics,
such as confidence, preference, creativity, tolerance, and honesty, the goal does
not vary. The goal can be generalized into one classification of each topic. As
seen in Table 4.2, the occurrence of research goal on these topics is very low. The
results are 1.8% for each of RG13 and RG14, meanwhile all of RG12, RG15 and
RG16 have the same result with 0.9% of occurrence.
7. Research Design and Method
The discussion on research method has led the researcher to also analyze
about the data gathering instrument, data analysis technique, sampling technique
and validation technique as they are parts of research methodology that often
appear within a research report. The use of certain method usually demands the
researchers to determine what kind of instrument they should apply in order to
achieve the research goal. Indeed, several researchers preferred to use certain
sampling and validation techniques as well. In relation to this current research, it
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
is revealed that the studied research reports employed various types of research
method which are presented in Figure 4.5.
Figure 4.5: Research Design and Methods
Basically, research can be categorized into quantitative and qualitative in
nature. Each of these two general methods consists of several types of research
design. However, combining the two methods has become more common as it
enables the researchers to achieve richer findings. This kind of method is termed
as mixed method.
Regarding to this study, as seen in the Figure 4.5, the studied research
reports had applied various types of research design and method. There are 12
types found. However, several types of research design and method had become
9.7%
1.9%
7.8%
6.8%
14.6%
15.5%
1.9%
6.8%
1.9%
17.5%
6.8%
8.7%
Experimental
Ex-Post Facto
Survey
Correlation
Descriptive Qualitative
Case Study
Grounded Theory
Action Research
Ethnography
Quantitative
Qualitative
Mixed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
English educational researchers’ preference in conducting research on attitude and
related learning factors. Among 12 types, quantitative method has the highest
result with 17.5% as it was found in 18 research reports. It is followed by case
study with 15.5% (applied in 16 researches) and descriptive qualitative with
14.6% (used in 15 researches). Other types of research design and method which
receive similar results are experimental (9.7% or 10 researches), mixed method
(8.7% or 9 researches), survey (7.8% or 8 researches) and the three of correlation,
action research, and qualitative which get the same result (6.8% or 7 researches).
Other types of research design and method which were used within the studied
research reports are ex-post facto, grounded theory and also ethnography. The
three of them also receive the same result as each of them was applied solely in
two researches or 1.5% of occurrence. These results indicate that research on
these topics are diverse that English educational researchers can utilize any
methods within their research.
8. Data Gathering Instrument
Data gathering instrument within a research has played an important role
as it is used to collect the data. Quantitative and qualitative method usually have
different instruments to collect the data. In conducting research, it is common to
use more than one instrument in order to get richer data. Considering that the
studied research reports employed various types of research design and method,
the type of data gathering instrument varies as well. The findings are presented in
the following figure.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
Figure 4.6: Data Gathering Instruments
Figure 4.6 illustrates the use of data gathering instrument within the 100
research reports. In conducting research, it is common to use more than one type
of data gathering instrument in order to obtain more reliable and valid data. From
the figure above, there are seven types of instrument found from the studied
research reports. Nonetheless, the majority of the research reports utilized
questionnaire as the data gathering instrument. There are 67 researches or 37.9%
which used this instrument to obtain the data of their research. As much as 27.1%
or 48 researches are found to use interview. Different from questionnaire which is
known to be used in quantitative research, interview is commonly used within
qualitative research. With a small difference of result, observation with 14.7% of
occurrence and test with 12.4% of occurrence emerge as the next instrument
37.9%
27.1%
14.7%
12.4%
5.1%
1.7%
1.1%
Questionnaire
Interview
Observation
Test
Document
Survey
Discussion
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
chosen by researchers to obtain data for research on attitude and related learning
factors. Meanwhile document, survey and discussion were employed as well, even
though only in a small number of occurrence.
9. Data Analysis Technique
In terms of data analysis technique, quantitative and qualitative are two
common types of analysis researchers usually employ. But, some researchers were
found to combine both quantitative and qualitative which is termed as mixed
analysis. Furthermore, the use of quantitative analysis leads to the implementation
of statistical techniques such as descriptive statistics, ANOVA, regression,
correlation and so on. The results of data analysis techniques used in the studied
research reports are presented in the following figure.
Figure 4.7: Data Analysis Techniques
33.6%
3.5%
2.7%
2.7%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
6.2%
1.8%
1.8%
0.9%
31.9%
12.4%
Descriptive Statistics
ANOVA
Tukey
Cronbach's Alpha
Regression
T-Test
Rasch
Correlation
Mann-Whitney
Factor Analysis
U-Test
Qualitative
Mixed
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
The results presented in the figure above demonstrate that quantitative
analysis is the most frequently used technique with 55.9% of occurrence in total.
To be more specific, descriptive quantitative was found in 38 researches or 33.6%
of occurrence, while inferential quantitative was employed in 25 researches or
22.3% of occurrence. Among ten statistical techniques used in the studied
research reports, correlation was found as the most common one as it has 6.2% of
occurrence. ANOVA is in the second place with 3.5% of occurrence. Both Tukey
and Cronbach’s Alpha have the same result with 2.7% of occurrence. Mann-
Whitney and Factor Analysis are following with 1.8% of occurrence. Meanwhile
the rest statistical techniques have only 0.9% of occurrence.
As much as 31.9% or 36 researches were found to apply qualitative
analysis. Mixed analysis is also common within the studied research reports as it
has 12.4% of occurrence. It can be inferred that English educational research on
attitude and related learning factors are flexible as they can be conducted in both
quantitative and qualitative and even mixed technique.
10. Sampling Technique
Considering the large number of participant and some limitations in
conducting research, sampling technique is commonly used in a research. The use
of sampling technique is expected to represent the whole population. Thus,
researchers are able to examine smaller scale of data which is considered to have
represented the whole research subjects. In general, there are two broad types of
sampling technique. Those are probability and non-probability samplings. Each of
them has several types of sampling techniques.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76
In regard to this research, there are only 34 out of 100 research reports
which used sampling technique. These 34 research reports have yielded six
sampling techniques from both probability and non-probability types. The
findings are presented through Figure 4.8.
Figure 4.8: Sampling Techniques
Figure 4.8 reveals that random sampling and purposive sampling are the
most frequently used sampling technique within the studied research reports as
they receive high percentage of occurrence. Random sampling was employed in
12 researches or 35.3% of occurrence. Meanwhile purposive sampling was used
in 11 researches or 32.4% of occurrence. Cluster sampling is the next sampling
technique which becomes the researchers’ preference as it was used in four
35.3%
8.8%
11.8%
32.4%
8.8%
2.9%
Random Stratified Cluster Purposive Convenience Quota
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
researches. As presented in the figure, both stratified and convenience sampling
techniques receive the same result of occurrence with 8.8%. Thus, there is only a
slight difference with cluster sampling. Another sampling technique found within
the studied research reports is quota sampling which was used in one research or
2.9% of occurrence.
11. Validation Technique
Validation is considered as an important part of a research as it determines
whether or not the research is acceptable. Furthermore, providing valid and
reliable instruments can enhance the research results. Unfortunately, only 33 out
of 100 research reports which applied validation. The types of validation
technique found from the data are presented in the following figure.
Figure 4.9: Validation Techniques
42.4% 42.4%
9.1%
3% 3%
Validity Reliability Trustworthiness Credibility Triangulation
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78
As seen in the figure, there are five types of validation technique found
within 33 research reports. Both validity and reliability which belong to
quantitative method receive the same result of occurrence. Each of them was
found in 14 research reports or 42.4% of occurrence. Meanwhile for qualitative
method, out of the three validation techniques, trustworthiness was the most
common one compared to credibility and triangulation. These findings indicate
that the use of validation technique in English educational research is still very
rare despite its importance.
12. Research Result
The studied research reports revealed various research results. To make it
easy in understanding the results of 100 research reports, the researcher had made
some generalizations. She had classified the results into 28 classifications which
are presented in the following table.
Table 4.3: Research Results
Code Result Total Percentage
(%)
RS01
Participants have positive attitude towards English
teaching and learning (motivation to learn English,
learning process, material, teacher, students, method,
assessment, test
18 15.5
RS02
Participants have negative attitude towards English
teaching and learning (learning (motivation to learn,
learning process, material, teacher, students, method,
assessment, test)
2 1.7
RS03 The reliability and validity of attitude assessment is low 1 0.9
RS04 There is no significance difference in attitude and
perception among the participants 2 1.7
RS05 There is a correlation between students’ attitude and their
English achievement 1 0.9
RS06 The teaching methods improve students’ motivation 8 6.9
RS07 Students have high motivation to learn English 3 2.6
RS08 Students have low motivation to learn English 4 3.4
RS09 Students with high motivation learn English better 1 0.9
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
Table 4.3: Research Results (cont.)
Code Result Total Percentage
(%)
RS10 Students’ motivation are affected by both internal and
external factors 7 6.0
RS11 There is a positive and low correlation between students’
motivation and their English achievement 6 5.2
RS12
Participants have positive and strong beliefs towards
English teaching and learning (learning process, material,
teacher, students, method, assessment, test)
11 9.5
RS13 There is a correlation among belief, learning strategies
and English achievement 2 1.7
RS14
Participants have positive perceptions towards English
teaching and learning (learning strategy, learning process,
material, teacher, students, method, assessment, test)
20 17.2
RS15
Participants have negative perceptions towards English
teaching and learning (learning process, material, teacher,
students, method, assessment, test)
2 1.7
RS16 Students’ perceptions and beliefs are affected by both
internal and external factors 2 1.7
RS17 Students have various learning style (visual, auditory,
kinesthetic) in learning English 3 2.6
RS18 The teaching methods facilitate students with different
learning styles to learn English 1 0.9
RS19 The teaching methods do not facilitate students with
different learning styles to learn English 1 0.9
RS20 Learning styles help students in learning English 1 0.9
RS21 There is low correlation between students’ learning style
and their English achievement 1 0.9
RS22 Students use various learning strategies (both direct and
indirect) in learning English 7 6.0
RS23 The learning strategies affect the students’ English
achievement 4 3.4
RS24 Students who have high confidence perform better in
English learning 1 0.9
RS25 Students showed some preferences in learning English
(teacher, material, method, task, test, assessment) 3 2.6
RS26 Teaching method improves participants’ creativity in
learning English 2 1.7
RS27 Students have good tolerance in learning English 1 0.9
RS28 Students tend to be honest in learning English 1 0.9
Total 116 100
As seen in Table 4.3 there are 28 classifications of research results which
were derived from 11 investigated topics. In line with the goals of the studied
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
research reports presented in Table 4.2, some researches had more than one
research results. In terms of attitude, the results were classified into five
classifications. Those are RS01, RS02, RS03, RS04 and RS05. The majority of
research on attitude had yielded the similar result in which the participants had
positive attitude towards English teaching and learning and its components as
stated in RS01. It has 15.5% of occurrence. Meanwhile four other results receive
only 1.7% (RS02 and RS04) and 0.9% (RS03 and RS05) of occurrence.
Research results on motivation were categorized into six categories
namely RS06, RS07, RS08, RS09, RS10 and RS11. In terms of occurrence, RS06
appears as the most common result found with 6.9%, followed by RS10 with 6%
and RS11 with 5.2%. The result of RS07 and RS08 have only 0.8% difference.
Meanwhile RS09 is the lowest in terms of occurrence.
The next topic is belief. Research results on this topic were classified into
three classifications namely RS12, RS13 and RS16. Among these three results,
RS12 has the highest occurrence with 9.5% compare to the other two (RS13 and
RS16) which have only 1.7% of occurrence. These findings indicate that the
participants had similar beliefs about English teaching and learning which was
positive.
Research results on perception can be seen through RS04, RS14, RS15,
and RS16. Among these four results, RS14 was found in almost all studied
research reports on perception. It has the highest occurrence with 17.2%.
Meanwhile the other three results receive the same outcome with 1.7% of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
81
occurrence. These findings reveal that most participants hold positive perception
towards English teaching-learning including its components.
Research results on learning style were presented through RS17, RS18,
RS19, RS20 and RS21. However, considering that the number of research
conducted on this issue was limited, the occurrence of those results is also in a
small number. RS17 has 1.7% of occurrence, which is the highest among five
classifications of research result on learning style. The rest results have the same
occurrence which is only 0.9%. These findings indicate that English educational
research on learning style had yielded various results.
In terms of learning strategy, the research results were classified into three
classifications namely RS13, RS22, and RS23. Among the three classifications,
RS22 dominates the occurrence with 6%. RS23 is in the second place with 3.4%
of occurrence. The last is RS13 with only 1.7% of occurrence. Despite the small
number of research on this topic, these findings indicate that learning strategy is
an inseparable learning factor affecting English teaching and learning. As seen
from the research results, students employed various types of learning strategy in
learning English. Besides, several researchers had confirmed that this learning
factor affected students’ achievement in learning English.
Research results on each of these topics (i.e. confidence, preference,
creativity, tolerance and honesty) was classified into one classification only. In
terms of occurrence, all of them receive low percentage. As seen in the Table 4.3,
RS24 about confidence has 0.9% of occurrence, RS25 about preference has 2.6%
of occurrence, RS26 about creativity has 1.7% of occurrence, and both RS27
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
82
about tolerance and RS28 about honesty have 0.9% of occurrence. These findings
indicate that research on these topics had revealed different and specific truth.
B. DISCUSSION
This section discusses the interpretation of the findings presented in the
previous section. To achieve precise discussion, this section is divided into two
parts, namely the trends of research on attitude and related learning factors in
English education and the relation between the research trends and Competence-
based Learning.
1. The Trends of Research on Attitude and Related Learning Factors in
English Education
The results of the research contents presented in the previous section
become a source to discover the trends of research on attitude and related learning
factors in English education. Before going further into the discussion, the
summary of the results for each category is presented in the following table.
Table 4.4: The Summary of the Analysis Results
No. Category The Dominant Findings
1 Investigated Topic - Motivation
- Perception
- Attitude
2 Concept Clarification Most of them shared the similar concept
of the investigated topics
3 Related Topic - Teaching method
- English skills
- English knowledge
4 Origin Indonesia
5 Participant University student
6 Research Goal To find out participants’ motivation,
perception, attitude, belief, learning style
and learning strategy
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
83
Table 4.4: The Summary of the Analysis Results (cont.)
No. Category The Dominant Findings
7 Research Design and
Method
- Quantitative (experimental, survey,
correlation, ex-post facto)
- Qualitative (case study and descriptive
qualitative)
8 Data Gathering Instrument - Questionnaire
- Interview
9 Data Analysis Technique - Descriptive statistics
- Qualitative
10 Sampling Technique - Random
- Purposive
11 Validation Technique - Validity
- Reliability
12 Research Result - Participants hold positive perception,
attitude and belief towards English
language teaching and learning.
- The teaching methods improved
students’ motivation.
- Students’ motivation is affected by both
internal and external factors.
- Students used various learning
strategies in learning English.
Based on Table 4.4, the results of investigated topics found within the
studied research reports indicated that there was a tendency of English educational
research on three topics namely motivation, perception, and attitude. On the other
hand, 18 character values of both spiritual and social attitudes in Competence-
based Learning seemed to receive little attention. These findings pointed out that
there was an unbalanced investigation occurred in English education field,
especially those which focused on attitude and related learning factors. As these
tendencies emerged from researches which were conducted in 2007 to 2016,
therefore it can be articulated that research topic on attitude in Competence-based
Learning is not yet common for English educational researchers. Whereas it has
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
84
become the concern of today’s education due to the implementation of
Competence-based Learning as the current approach.
In terms of concept clarification, most of the studied research reports
shared similar concept of the investigated topics. There were only some of them
yielding different and specific meaning. For attitude, there was a tendency for
English educational researchers to view attitude as a learning factor comprises of
affective, behavior and cognitive components. Cognitive component in attitude
involves several learning factors such as perception and belief. They differentiated
attitude into positive and negative. As discussed in chapter II, such kind of
meaning was termed as attitude in narrow meaning. Once more, this finding
indicated that the concept of attitude in Competence-based Learning, which was
termed as attitude in broad meaning, was not yet common among researchers in
English education. The findings on concept clarification also indicated that
English educational researchers tended to view perception and belief as similar
concepts as their meanings overlapped. Furthermore, it can be stated that these
two concepts were actually parts of attitude, particularly in cognitive component.
Most of the studied research reports did not analyze only one topic but
they connected with other topics. The findings on related topic presented in Figure
4.2 indicated that teaching method, English language skills and knowledge were
seen as significant component in English education that they were investigated
along with attitude and five related learning factors namely motivation,
perception, belief, learning style and learning strategy. It confirmed that English
education in practice could not be separated from such components.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
85
Research on attitude and five related learning factors were conducted in
various areas of English namely ECC, OCC and ICC. This finding showed that
these areas had contributed to the investigation of attitude and five related
learning factors in English education. As the focus of this research is on
Indonesia, which is a part of ECC, most of the studied research reports were
conducted in this country. In other words, research in Indonesia had explored
about attitude and several related learning factors in English education.
Furthermore, the findings on origin of the research reports indicated that ECC
division was dominated by Asian countries.
The results of participant presented in Figure 4.4 indicated that there was a
tendency for English educational researchers on attitude and related learning
factors to choose university students as their research subject. As university
students dominated the findings, the information on attitude and related learning
factors within other levels of students, teacher and lecturers is limited. As
university students are adult learners, the information on how these research
topics affect young learners in learning English could not be well represented.
The findings on the goals of the studied research reports revealed that the
majority of them shared the similar goals. Therefore, some generalizations can be
made. Through these findings, it can be inferred that most of them wanted to find
out the participants’ motivation, perception attitude, belief, learning style and
learning strategy without investigating what variables affected those findings.
There was only a small number of research which tried to discover the effect of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
86
teaching method towards participants’ motivation. In short, the studies on these
topics remained on the surface.
The interpretation of methodology used within the studied research reports
covers research design and method, data gathering instrument, data analysis
technique, sampling technique, and validity technique. The findings on research
design and method were almost equal for both quantitative and qualitative
methods. However, with only 3% of difference, quantitative method had higher
percentage in terms of occurrence. This may be due to the fact that quantitative
method with its statistical technique is able to provide results which are easier to
understand rather than qualitative one which is generally very complex. As
pointed out by Harry, Sturges, and Klinger (2005) that quantitative method entails
established steps to follow, unlike qualitative which requires judgement decisions
that is quite hard for some inexperienced researchers to do so. However, as the
occurrence of qualitative method was also high, it could be articulated that
research on attitude and related learning factors could be conducted both
quantitatively and qualitatively.
In parallel with the findings on research design and method, questionnaire
(37.9%) was found to be the most common data gathering instrument applied in
the studied research reports. De Joung (2007, in Gul and Sozbilir, 2016) mentions
that the use of questionnaire enables the researchers to obtain large number of data
in quite fast period. However, the weakness of this instrument is that it cannot
provide richer and deeper information about the participants, compared to other
instruments usually used in qualitative studies (i.e. interview). Moreover, for
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
87
qualitative method, interview was the most common instrument used within the
studied research reports. It was utilized to obtain data for qualitative research
since it was able to provide richer and deeper information.
Still, the interpretation on methodology also leads to the discussion of
data analysis technique. Due to the fact that the researchers among the 100
research reports preferred employing quantitative method, statistical technique,
particularly descriptive statistic (33.6%) emerged as the most common analysis
technique used within the studied research reports. This finding indicated that
inferential statistics were not yet common to analyze data for research on these
topics. Descriptive statistics is known as the basic analysis technique commonly
used in quantitative research. However, the findings on this category also revealed
that qualitative analysis was found as the second preference among the researchers
within the studied research reports. Therefore, these findings were in line with the
results on research design and method.
Other components involved in the discussion of methodology are sampling
technique and validation technique. In terms of sampling technique, the findings
showed that random sampling (35.3%) and purposive sampling (32.4%) were two
techniques frequently employed within the studied research reports. These
findings indicated that both probability and non-probability sampling techniques
had been common for English educational researchers that they used them in
almost equal number. Meanwhile, in terms of validation technique, both reliability
(42.4%) and validity (42.4%) were found to be the top two validation techniques
used in the studied research reports. These two types of validation technique are
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
88
known to be used in quantitative research. Therefore, these findings were in line
with quantitative method which was found as the most dominant method used
within the studied research reports. However, the number of the studied research
reports implementing sampling technique and validation technique are limited. It
could be inferred that these two components were not widely used in English
educational research, especially those which dealing with attitude and related
learning factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style and learning
strategy. As mentioned by Gul and Sozbilir (2016) this kind of phenomenon
might be connected with lack of researchers’ knowledge and skills on the basis of
conducting research.
The findings of research results from the studied research reports revealed
that most of the participants hold positive perception, attitude and belief towards
English language teaching and learning. Other results which received low number
of occurrence indicated that such results were specific and confirmed that not
every research on these topics yielded the same discovery. In short, it can be
inferred that English, which is viewed as a foreign language and second language
in the area where the majority of the researches had been conducted, was
respected by the participants in educational context. As the use of English was
widespread and in general, the participants showed interest and respect towards
English language teaching and learning.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
89
2. The Relation between The Trends of Research on Attitude and Related
Learning Factors and Competence-based Learning
This part discloses the relation between the trends of research on attitude
and five related learning factors and Competence-based Learning, particularly
concerning the concept of attitude as practiced in 2013 Curriculum. Competence-
based Learning has been implemented in Indonesia since the year of 2000 (The
Decree of National Ministry of Education No. 232/U/2000). Therefore, it is
necessary to relate the trends of research which were conducted in 2007 to 2016
and Competence-based Learning as the current approach in education field.
Richards and Rodgers (2001) assert that the concern of Competence-based
Learning is on the three competences namely attitude, skills and knowledge.
However, among the tree competences, this research focuses only on attitude. The
concept of attitude in this approach can be seen from 2013 Curriculum. This
curriculum differentiates attitude into spiritual and social which covers 18
character values such as religious, honest, tolerant and so on (Ministry of
Education and Culture in Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter
Bangsa, 2010).
As discussed in the previous part, the trends of research on attitude and
related learning factors consist of 12 categories. Nonetheless, to disclose the
relation between the research trends and the Competence-based Learning,
particularly concerning the concept of attitude, the researcher did not use all the
12 categories. Considering that the discussion dealt with a concept, therefore, only
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
90
three out of 12 categories were used. The three categories are investigated topic,
concept clarification and related topic.
In terms of investigated topic, the trends revealed that motivation (22.6%),
perception (21.7%) and attitude (20%) are the most studied topics in English
educational research which were conducted in 2007 to 2016. For concept
clarification, the majority of research on motivation tended to define motivation as
an effort, willingness, desire to take action in order to achieve a certain goal.
Perception in the studied research reports was mostly described as individual’s
belief, attitude, view and ay to act or perceive something. Meanwhile the trend of
attitude was described as individual’s positive and negative cognitive, affective
and behavior towards something. In terms of related topic, teaching method
(30%), English skills (speaking 12.9%, reading 11.4%, writing 8.6% and listening
8.6%) and English knowledge (vocabulary 5.7%, grammar 5.7% and
pronunciation 2.9%) appeared as the most frequently studied topics along with
attitude and related learning factors.
These trends indicated that English educational research on attitude and
related learning factors which were conducted in 2007 to 2016 had not explore
many topics of attitude as practiced in 2013 Curriculum. Based on the findings,
only a small number of research had explored about confidence (0.9%), creativity
(1.7%), honesty (0.9%) and tolerance (0.9%) which belong to 18 character values
of attitude in 2013 Curriculum. Almost all of the investigated attitudes were
dealing with attitude in narrow meaning. However, the concept of attitude in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
91
Competence-based Learning in this research is termed as attitude in broad
meaning.
Despite the findings that the studied research reports had not investigated
many topics of attitude in 2013 Curriculum, they had associated English skills
(speaking, writing, reading and listening) and knowledge (vocabulary, grammar
and pronunciation) in the investigation of attitude and related learning factors. It
could be articulated that they were in line with the principal of Competence-based
Learning in which it views attitude as an integrated competence along with skills
and knowledge. Therefore, they had yielded the principle of Competence-based
Learning.
In short, through this discussion it could be articulated that English
educational researchers within the studied research reports might not be familiar
with the concept of attitude in Competence-based Learning. Therefore, it resulted
in such trends where most of them tended to investigate attitude in its narrow
meaning and several related learning factors instead of exploring about attitude in
its broad meaning. Whereas the implementation of Competence-based Learning in
Indonesia, which can be seen through 2013 Curriculum, highlights the concept of
attitude a competence which covers 18 character values (Ministry of Education
and Culture in Pengembangan Pendidikan Budaya dan Karakter Bangsa, 2010).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
92
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS
This chapter consists of three sections. The first is conclusions which
present several significant points of the research results. The second is
implications which reveal the impacts of the research results. The last is
suggestions for several parties about the follow-up actions of this research.
A. CONCLUSIONS
This research was attempted to discover the trends of research on attitude
and related learning factors namely motivation, perception, belief, learning style
and learning strategy in English education. A hundred research reports which are
in the form of thesis, journal article, and research paper dealing with attitude and
related learning factors were taken as the data sources. Moreover, content analysis
was used as the research method to achieve the research goal. The research reports
were published in 2007 to 2016. Most of them were conducted in Indonesia. From
the analysis results presented in the previous chapter, the researcher can draw
some conclusions.
First, the unbalanced results on the investigated topic indicated that there
was a tendency for English educational researchers to conduct research on three
topics namely motivation, perception, and attitude. On the other hand, the concept
of attitude in Competence-based Learning which involves 18 character values of
both spiritual and social attitudes seemed to receive little attention. Most of them
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
93
shared similar concept of the investigated issues. Research on these topics were
commonly associated with teaching method and English skills and knowledge.
These findings are in line with the principle of Competence-based Learning where
it views attitude as an integrated competence along with skills and knowledge.
In terms of participants, the role and development of attitude and five
related learning factors could not be well represented as the researchers tended to
use adult learners as their research subject. Research on these topics were mostly
intended to find out participants’ motivation, perception, attitude, belief, learning
style and learning strategy towards English language teaching and learning.
In terms of methodology, the results were almost equal for both
quantitative and qualitative methods. However, quantitative method received
higher percentage in terms of occurrence. Indeed, questionnaire was found as the
most frequently used instrument to obtain the data and followed by interview.
Moreover, descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis were found as the most
dominant analysis techniques. These results indicate that research on attitude and
related learning factors can be conducted both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Unfortunately, the use of both sampling and validation techniques is still in a
limited number. Therefore, it can be interpreted that English educational
researchers within the studied research reports are still less aware about the
importance of these two components in conducting research.
In terms of results, the findings revealed that most of the participant hold
positive perception, attitude and belief towards English language teaching and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
94
learning. It can be articulated that participants in ICC, OCC and ECC, particularly
in Indonesia showed interest and respect towards English teaching and learning.
Second, the results of qualitative analysis indicate that English educational
research on attitude and related learning factors which were conducted in 2007 to
2016 had not explore many topics of attitude as practiced in 2013 Curriculum.
However, they had yielded the principle of Competence-based Learning where
attitude is viewed as an integrated competence along with skills and knowledge. It
can be seen from the involvement of English skills (speaking, writing, reading and
listening) and knowledge (vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation) in the
investigation of attitude and related learning factors.
Indeed, these conclusions have a weakness point due to the main
instrument of this research, that is the researcher herself. Therefore, she applied
keywords and a table to minimize the subjectivity of the research results. Whereas
the strength of this research laid on the qualitative analysis. The previous studies
on research trends did not apply qualitative analysis in examining the research
reports. Therefore, the results remain on the surface as they simply present the
occurrences of the research contents without investigating deeper about the
relation of those research trends with the current approach or curriculum.
In a nutshell, this research provides information on current trends of
English educational research on attitude and related learning factors and their
relation with Competence-based Learning. Through the results of this research, an
adjustment can be made in order to improve the quality of English education,
particularly regarding to attitude in Competence-based Learning.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
95
B. IMPLICATIONS
The results of this research have both scientific and practical implications.
First, the scientific implication reveals that attitude in English education is
commonly integrated with other learning factors such as motivation, belief,
perception, learning style and learning strategy. These concepts are related to
other components in English language learning such as English skills, knowledge,
teaching methods, and even assessment as well. In a nutshell, the findings of this
research provide evidence on the theories of attitude and five related learning
factors. Regarding to the different concept of attitude, which can be termed as
narrow and broad meanings, it is necessary to provide clear explanation on such
concept to avoid misunderstanding. Furthermore, considering the trends of
research on attitude in which most of them were dealing with attitude in narrow
meaning, it can be inferred that English educational researchers within the studied
research reports had not been familiar with the concept of attitude in Competence-
based Learning.
Second, the practical implications are addressed to the practitioners in
English education (i.e. educators, students, university managers and policy
makers) to be more aware that there have been many research investigating about
attitude and other related learning factors. They can use the results of these
investigations to reflect on their own attitude and later to improve their attitude
towards English language learning. Furthermore, they can utilize the results of
these investigations for decision making whether or not they should make an
adjustment or improvement within their situation in English educational context.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
96
C. SUGGESTIONS
This research may have some weaknesses due to the limitations.
Therefore, the researcher wants to provide some suggestions for several parties
regarding the results of this research.
First, for both educators and students, it is highly suggested to pay more
attention to their attitude towards English language teaching and learning. It aims
to improve the quality of English education and to achieve the goal of national
education. This is because the implementation of Competence-based Learning
through 2013 Curriculum concerns on the three competences, in which one of
them is attitude. Moreover, it demands the students to possess both spiritual and
social attitude at the end of learning.
Second, for future researchers who have the same interest to conduct
research on attitude in English education, they can analyze other unexplored
topics related to attitude in its broad meaning so that it will be more relevant with
the concept of attitude in Competence-based Learning. It aims to provide more
sufficient information on the development and implementation of Competence-
based Learning in English education which can be seen through 2013 Curriculum.
They also can examine other research reports which were published in different
years and originated from different area.
Third, for university managers and policy makers of English education,
they should monitor the researchers who conduct research on attitude in English
education so that future research on this topic will expose more about attitude in
Competence-based Learning. Therefore, more sufficient information on the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
97
current situation of English education, particularly regarding to attitude in
Competence-based learning as practiced in 2013, can be depicted for
improvement purpose.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahmed, S. (2015). Attitudes towards English language learning among EFL
learners at UMSKAL. Journal of Education and Practice 6(18), pp. 6-16.
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). The handbook of attitudes.
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Alfaruqy, D. (2014). EFL teachers’ perceptions on designing and evaluating
language materials: A case study. The 61st TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 241-245).
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., &Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to
Research in Education (8th Ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
Bahamonde-Birke, F. J., Kunert, U., Link, H., & Ortúzar, J. D. (2015). About
attitudes and perceptions-finding the proper way to consider latent
variables in discrete choice models. Berlin: DIW Berlin.
Bangou, F., Fleming, D., & Goff-Kfouri, C. A. (2011). Pre-service teachers’
beliefs related to English as a second language and English as a foreign
language: Where is the difference?. Theory and Practice in Language
Studies 1(9), pp. 1031-1040.
Bartram, B. (2010). Attitudes to Modern Foreign Language Learning. New York:
Continuum.
Bidin, S., Jusoff, K., & Aziz, N. A. (2009). Motivation and attitude in learning
English among UiTM students in the northern region of Malaysia. English
Language Teaching 2(2), pp. 16-20.
Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M. & Sheldon, B.
(1997). The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation.
Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood
Education.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principle of language learning and teaching (4th Ed.). New
York: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle. An Interactive Approach to
Language Pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
Caliskan, H. & Kilinc, G. (2012). The relationship between the learning styles of
students and their attitudes towards social studies course. Procedia Social
and Behavioral Science 55 (pp. 47-56).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
Chaiyasook, W. & Jaroongkhongdach, W. (2014). A content analysis of Thai
master’s thesis in ELT from 2003 to 2011. Proceedings of the
International Conference: DRAL 2/ ILA, pp. 64-74.
Crytal, D. (1997). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (4th Ed.). Oxford:
Blackwell.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M. (2005). Second language acquisition: An
advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Depdiknas. (2010). Pengembangan pendidikan budaya dan karakter bangsa.
Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Badan Penelitian dan
Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum.
Depdiknas. (2013). Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum 2013. Jakarta:
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Depdiknas. (2014). Konsep dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta:
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Despagne, C. (2010). The difficulties of learning English: Perceptions and
attitudes in Mexico. Canadian and International Education 39(2), pp. 55-
74.
Dӧrnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd Ed.).
Edinburgh: Longman.
Drisko, J. W. & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Ellis, R. (2008) The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd Ed.). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in
education (7th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and second language learning: The role
of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-
language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gomleksiz, M. N. (2010). An evaluation of students’ attitudes toward English
language learning in terms of several variables. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences 9, pp. 913-918.
Gul, S. & Sozbilir, M. (2016). International trends in Biology education research
from 1997 to 2014: A content analysis of papers in selected journals.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
Eurasia Journal Mathematics, Science & Technology 12(6), pp. 1631-
1651.
Hadi, R. (2015). The integration of character values in the teaching of economics:
A case of selected high schools in Banjarmasin. International Education
Studies 8(7), pp. 11-20.
Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klinger, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An
exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis.
Educational Researcher, 34(2), pp. 3-13.
Honna, N. (2005). English as a multicultural language in Asia and intercultural
literacy. Intercultural Communication Studies 14(2), pp. 73-89.
Hosseini, S. B. & Pourmandnia, D. (2013). Language learners’ attitudes and
beliefs: Brief review of the related literature and framework. International
Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 4(4), pp. 63-
74.
Hulela, K., Kelebekae, K., & Boipono, M. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions towards
the Botswana education television program (Betv) in delivering instruction
on mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Research and Review
4(1), 6-13.
Hussein, G. (2015). A content analysis evaluation of the journal of teaching
English with technology (TEwT) between years of 2008 & 2013. Procedia
Social and Behavioral Sciences 191, pp. 31-36.
Ibrahimoglu, N., Unaldi, I., Samancioglu, M., & Baglibel, M. (2013). The
relationship between personality learning factors and learning styles: A
cluster analysis. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education
2(3), pp. 93-108.
Jain, V. (2014). 3D model of attitude. International Journal of Advanced
Research in Management and Social Sciences 3(3), pp. 1-12.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for international
communication and English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Validity in content analysis. In E. Mochmann (Eds.),
Computerstrategien fur die Kommunikationsanalyse. Frankfurt: Campus.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
(2nd Ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc.
Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of
key factors. Makara, Social Humaniora, 12(1), pp. 9-20.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
101
Lin, L. C. & Cheng, C. P. (2010). Research trends in selected M.A. TESOL
programs in Taiwan: A preliminary content analysis of master’s theses
from 2003-2007. Asian EFL Journal, 12(4).
Lumsden, L. S. (1994). Student motivation to learn. ERIC Digest, No. 92, pp. 1-6.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social
Research, 1(2).
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis-theoretical foundation, basic
procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. Retrieved on December 1st,
2016 from http://psychopen.eu/books/qualitative-content-analysis/.
Mokhtar, M. M. (2015). Lecturers’ and students’ beliefs in code-switching: A
Malaysian polytechnic context. TEFLIN Journal 26(1), pp. 85-96.
Msuya, E. A. (2016). Language learning strategies by EFL secondary school
learners in Tanzania: An exploratory account. Porto Alergre 7(1), pp. 94-
108.
Mulyasa. (2014). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung:
Remaja Rosdakarya.
Neuendorf. (2002). Content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications Inc.
O’Sullivan, N. & Burce, A. (2014). Teaching and learning in competency-based
education. The Fifth International Conference on e-Learning, pp. 71-77.
Otara, A. (2011). Perception: A guide for managers and leaders. Journal of
Management and Strategy 2(3), pp. 21-24.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview.
Learning Style & Strategies/Oxford, GALA, pp. 1-25.
Ozmen, K. S. & Aydin, H. U. (2015). Examining student teachers’ beliefs about
oral corrective feedback: Insights from a teacher education program in
Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 40(12), pp 141-164.
Pickens, J. (2005). Organizational behavior in health care. Sudbury: Jones and
Bartlett Publishers.
Prasad, B. D. (2008). Content analysis: A method in social science research. In D.
K. Lal Das & V. Bhaskaran (Eds.), Research methods for social work (pp.
173-193). New Delhi: Rawat.
Reece, I. & Walker, S. (1997). Teaching, Training and Learning: A practical
Guide (3rd Ed.). Houghton-le-Spring: Business Education Publishers.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
102
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan
Republik Indonesia tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi Tahun
2014 No. 49. Jakarta: Depdikbud.
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language
Teaching (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using
quantitative content analysis in research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F. G. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using
quantitative content analysis in research (2nd Ed.). London: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Rose, S., Spinks, N., & Canhoto, A. I. (2015). Quantitative content analysis. In
Rose, S., Spinks, N., & Canhoto, A. I. (Eds.). Management Research:
Applying the Principles. New York: Routledge.
Sánchez, A. V. & Ruiz, M. P. (2008). Competence-based learning: A proposal for
the assessment of generic competence. Bilbo: University of Deusto.
Solak, E. (2014). The content analysis of the research papers on foreign language
education in Turkey. International Journal of English and Education 3(3),
pp. 167-178.
Steel, C. (2009). Reconciling university teacher beliefs to create learning designs
for LMS environments. Australian Journal of Education Technology,
25(3), pp. 339-420.
Subandi. (2014). Indonesian curriculum development: meaning-based curriculum
and competency-based curriculum in the context of teaching English
subject. The Second International Conference on Education and Language
(pp. 198-205).
Suratno, A., Murniati, C. T., & Aydawati, E. N. (2014). Students’ perceptual
beliefs about the information technology for language. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 919-922).
Susandi, N. K. A. & Khaerudin, T. (2015). Attitude toward teachers, motivation
and learning achievement: The case of Indonesian EFL students.
Linguistika 22(42), pp. 76-93.
Tantra, D. K. (2015). Teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia: A
literature review. Teaching English as A Foreign Language 4(1), pp. 1-5.
Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass media research: An introduction
(9th Ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
103
Woodcock, S. (2013). Trainee teachers’ attitudes towards students with specific
learning disabilities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education 38(8), pp.
16-29.
Yates, L. (2004). What does good education research look like? Situating a field
and its practices. London: Open University Press.
Yulia, Y. (2014). An evaluation of English language teaching programs in
Indonesian junior high schools in the Yogyakarta province (Doctoral
dissertation). Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
104
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Data Sources
No. Entry Code Full Identity
1 01IND2014BeRe
ad
Kusumawardhani, I. & Suhendra, E. (2014). Teachers’
belief in teaching reading towards national
examination challenge in Indonesia. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 33-36).
2 02IND2014Perc
Alfaruqy, D. (2014). EFL teachers’ perception on designing
and evaluating language materials: A case study. The
61st International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 241-245).
3 03IND2014Perc
MethSpeak
Susan, I. (2014). The implementation of role play:
Classroom practice and students’ perception. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 602-605).
4 04IND2014Perc
MethSpeak
Safitri, I. N., Nurkamto, J. & Sumardi. (2014). The
students’ perception of the teachers’s tasks and their
accomplishment in the speaking class. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 615-620).
5 05IND2014MotM
eth
Agustina, L. (2014). Inserting technology on performing
drama improving students’ motivation on learning
English as a foreign language. The 61st International
TEFLIN Conference (pp. 641-644).
6 06IND2014MotM
ethList
Amumpuni, R. (2014). The effectiveness of graphic
organizer in teaching listening viewed from students’
motivation. The 61st International TEFLIN
Conference (pp. 740-743).
7 07IND2014AttM
ethSpeak
Priyatin, T. (2014). Students’ attitudes towards cooperative
learning in enhancing their motivation to speak. The
61st International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 846-849).
8 08IND2014BelM
eth
Suratno, A., Muniarti, C. T., & Aydawati, E. N. (2014).
Students’ perceptual beliefs about the information
technology for language learning. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 919-922).
9 09IND2014Conf
MethPron
Zainnuri, H. (2014). The effectiveness of using Tell Me
More to assist teaching pronunciation of English
viewed from students’ self-confidence. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 942-945).
10 10IND2014Perc
MethRead
Sudiran. (2014). Students’ perception of the use of search
engine (Ict) as teaching media in reading course. The
61st International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 999-1002).
11 11IND2014AttM
ethList
Suparjan. (2014). Students’ attitudes to podcast as a
supporting media for enhancing listening skill: A study
of Tanjungpura university students. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1003-1006).
12 12IND2014MotM
ethGram
Komara, U. (2014). Motivating students through edmodo:
A blended learning in grammar class. The 61st
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
105
No. Entry Code Full Identity
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1016-1019).
13 13IND2014Learn
StyLearnStra
Fauziah & Yugafiati, R. (2014). The impact of learning
style on language learning strategies of L2 learners.
The 61st International TEFLIN Conference(pp. 1050-
1054).
14 14IND2014Perc
Meth
Yulianto, S. W. (2014). Students’ perception on orsa
(orderly rows seating arrangement) The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1105-1108).
15 15IND2014PercA
ss
Sumekto, D. R. (2014). Higher education students’
perception abot peer assessment practice. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1137-1141).
16 16IND2014PercA
ss
Trisanti, N. (2014). English teacher’ perspective on
authentic assessment implementation of curriculum
2013. The 61st International TEFLIN Conference (pp.
1172-1175).
17 17IND2014Learn
StraAnx
Limantoro, S. W. (2014). Anxiety on the presentation or
oral examination in learning ESL. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1187-1191).
18 18IND2014AttAs
s
Karolina, V. (2014). A measure of attitude toward peer
assessment realiability and validity. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1195-1999).
19 19IND2014Learn
StraList
Zuhairi, A. & Hidayati, I. (2014). Strategies of learning
listening skill employed by Indonesian learners in
relation with gender and proficiency. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1236-1240).
20 20IND2014Learn
Stra
Kamil, D., Suhaimi, Hartono, R., & Vintoni, A. (2014).
TEFL students’ language learning strategies: A study
at state islamic college of Kerinci, Indonesia. The 61st
International TEFLIN Conference (pp. 1245-1249).
21 21IND2014Perc
MethSpeakGram
Kustyasari, D. (2014). Students’ perception of English
teachers’ performance in English language course in
Indonesia. The 61st International TEFLIN Conference
(pp. 1250-1253).
22 22IND2014Perc
Sunggingwati, D. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ perception
on teaching features: A case study at Mulawarman
university. The 61st International TEFLIN Conference
(pp. 1268-1271).
23 23IND2015BelLe
arnStraVoc
Melani, B. Z., Isnaini, M., & Wardhana, L. A. (2015).
Vocabulary learning strategies preferences by EFL
university learners. The 62nd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 25-34).
24 24IND2015Learn
StyMethVoc
Astri, Z. (2015). The use of total physical response method
for different learning styles in English vocabulary
development. The 62nd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 66-76).
25 25IND2015Mot
Astuti, S. P. (2015). What motivates Indonesian high school
students to learn English? The 62nd TEFLIN
International Conference (pp. 77-87).
26 26IND2015Pref Sukarni, E. I & Sari, N. P. (2015). Preference of EYL
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
106
No. Entry Code Full Identity
mixed class students’ intercultural competence
assessment tool, textbook exercise or animation video:
What do we learn? The62nd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 147-159).
27 27IND2015PercA
ss
Lubis, A. A. & Rahmawati, M. (2015). Teachers’ opinions
on the implementation of various attitude assessment
instruments in junior high school in curriculum 2013:
Its practicality. The 62nd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 160-165).
28 28IND2015Learn
Sty
Nuraeni, A. (2015). Teaching real-life experience in
translation class: The application of multiple
intelligences to facilitate students’ different learning
styles. The 62nd TEFLIN International Conference
(pp. 173-182).
29 29IND2015BelW
ri
Emaliana, I., Khoirunnisa, R., & Tyas, P. A. (2015).
Epistemic beliefs and achievement among EFL
university students. The 62nd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 363-369).
30 30IND2015PercG
ram
Priyatmojo, A. S. (2015). Perspective toward grammar
teaching: A case study in the English department of
UNNES. The 62nd TEFLIN International Conference
(pp. 386-393).
31 31IND2015BelGr
am
Puspitasari, D. (2015). A teacher’s beliefs in grammar and
her teaching practices: A case study of one
experienced EFL teacher in SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta.
The 62nd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 447-
453).
32 32IND2015Pref
Fitriana, R., Suhatmady, B., & Setiawan, I. (2015).
Students’ preferences toward corrective feedbacks on
students’ oral production. The 62nd TEFLIN
International Conference (pp. 468-480).
33 33IND2015BelAs
s
Irawan, D. (2015). Teachers’ assessment beliefs shift in
adopting new curriculum. The 62nd TEFLIN
International Conference (pp. 481-489).
34 34IND2015BelSp
eak
Amrina, R. & Anggraini, R. N. (2015). Successful English
teacher’s belief and practices in teaching speaking:
Toward the mastery of communication skill. The 62nd
TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 490-498).
35 35IND2015AttWr
i
Adnyani, L. D. S. (2015). Blended learning through
schoology in writing class: Students’ attitude. The
62nd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 598-604).
36 36IND2015Creat
Sari, N. & Addinna, A. (2015). What makes a student-poet
a poet: Learner’s autonomy, creativity, and self-
identity in the EFL classroom. The 62nd TEFLIN
International Conference (pp. 679-685).
37 37IND2015Creat
Muhaji, U. (2015). Using multiple intelligenes theory to
facilitate pre-service English teachers’ development of
ideas, creativities in utilizing instructional media. The
62nd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 861-867).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
107
No. Entry Code Full Identity
38 38IND2016Mot
Sari, A. P. & Sulistyo, G. H. (2016). Contribution of
motivation, language input, and milieu to second
langauge acquisition in English as a foreign language
context: An exploratory preliminary case study. The
63rd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 82-86).
39 39IND2016Mot
Fatimah, A. S. & Sulastri, F. (2016). Authentic material:
How do I motivate my students in ESP classroom? The
63rd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 196-200).
40 40IND2016BelLi
st
Mandasari, B. (2016). An analysis of teachers’ beliefs
toward authentic materials in teaching listening. The
63rd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 233-239).
41 41IND2016Perc
Indriana, D. & Ulfah, R. (2016). Students’ perceptions on
the use of schoologyin presentation calss. The 63rd
TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 380-384).
42 42IND2016MotS
peak
Rusmawaty, D. & Anggriyani, D. (2016). Activating
students’ motivation inspeaking class through the use
of board game at English department of Mulawarman
university Samarinda. The 63rd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 385-390).
43 43IND2016Learn
StyReadVoc
Wilany, E. (2016). The effect of cognitive styles and
vocabulary masterry to reading comprehension (An
expost fact research at university of Riau Kepulauan).
The 63rd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 531-
537).
44 44IND2016Mot
Sulistyaningsih, E. & Sumartono. (2016). The use of
glossing technique to enhace the ESP learners’
motivation in comprehending English text. The 63rd
TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 579-586).
45 45IND2016Learn
StraVoc
Syatriana, E. (2016). The implementation of jeopardy
strategy of EFL students of STKIP YPUP. The 63rd
TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 587-592).
46 46IND2016Perc
Wri
Rizkyah, F. (2016). Digital story telling in writing: Practice
and perception toward teaching with technology. The
63rd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 626-634).
47 47IND2016Learn
Sty
Hermanto & Nuswantara, K. (2016). Learning styles’
implications to learning and teaching English in its.
The 63rd TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 785-
789).
48 48IND2016Mot
Kaltsum, H. U. (2016). Folkfore to enhance the students’
motivation (innovation in language material
development). The 63rd TEFLIN International
Conference (pp. 837-841).
49 49IND2007Mot
Bradford, A. (2007). Motivational orientations in under-
researched FLL context: Findings from Indonesia.
RELC Journal 38(3), PP. 302-323.
50 50IND2009Perc
Marwan, A. (2009). English teachers’ perceptions about
their teaching: Using activity theory to identify
contradictions. TEFLIN Journal 20(2), pp. 159-168.
51 51IND2010Mot Gitawaty, D. (2010). The correlation between the students’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
108
No. Entry Code Full Identity
learninng motivationand their achievement in English:
A correlational study in the eight class of MTs Al-
Hamidiyah. A Thesis. Syarif Hidayatullah State
Islamic University.
52 52IND2010Perc
Jafar, M. B. (2010). Mainstream teachers’ attitude and
approaches to support children’s biliteracy
development in Australian classroom context. TEFLIN
Journal 21(2), pp. 153-171.
53 53IND2012BelM
otRead
Iftanti, E. (2012). A survey of the English reading habits of
EFL students in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal 23(2), pp.
149-164.
54 54IND2012AttM
eth
Cahyani, H. & Cahyono, B. Y. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes
and technology use in Indonesian EFL classrooms.
TEFLIN Journal 23(2), pp. 130-148.
55 55IND2012AttM
ot
Jefiza, A. (2012). Students’ motivation and attitudes toward
learning English in an English course in Bandung.
Indonesia University of Education.
56 56IND2013Learn
StraRead
Pratama, A. (2013). Using cooperative learning strategies
to improve reading comprehension of the sevent grade
students at SMP N 1 Borobudur in the academic year
of 2012/2013. A Thesis. Yogyakarta State University.
57 57IND2013MotS
peak
Istianti, N. (2013). The correlation between students’
motivation in learning speaking and their speaking
ability: A correlational study in the second grade of
SMA Darussalam Ciputat. A Thesis. Syarif
Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
58 58IND2013MotS
peak
Kurniawan, S. S. (2013). Improving students motivation in
learning speaking skills using movement games for the
4th grade students at SD 1 Terong in academic year of
2013/2014. A Thesis. Yogyakarta State University.
59 59IND2013AttPe
rcReadWri
Syahabuddin, K. (2013). Student English achievement,
attitude and behavior in bilingual and monolingual
schools in Aceh, Indonesia. A Thesis. State Institude
for Islamic Studies IAIN Ar-Raniry.
60 60IND2013Att
Dharma, M. & Rudianto, C. (2013). Indonesian EFL
students’ attitudes towards various English accents and
their own accents. English Education11(1), pp. 67-81.
61 61IND2013Perc
Khrismawan, B. (2013). Students’ perceptions about
paraphrasing and their cognitive processes in
paraphrasing. TEFLIN Journal 24(2), pp. 135-157.
62 62IND2014Mot
Rosalina, V. (2014). The relationship between students’
motivation and their English learning achievement: A
correlational study at the second grade of the SMAN 3
Tangsel. A Thesis. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic
University.
63 63IND2014Learn
StyList
Faridah, D. N. (2014). The relationship between students’
learning style and their achievement in listening skill.
A Thesis. The Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic
University.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
109
No. Entry Code Full Identity
64 64IND2014Att
Khoir, M. (2014). The language attitude of students of
English department UIN Sunan Kalijaga toward
English. A Thesis. State Islamic University Sunan
Kalijaga.
65 65IND2014AttM
ot
Nugroho, A. (2014). Motivation in learning English and
Attitudes towards learning English: A survey study. A
Thesis. Sanata Dharma University.
66 66IND2014Mot
Kuswandono, P. (2014). Voices of pre-service English
teachers: Reflecting motivations during practicum
learning. TEFLIN Journal 25(2), pp. 185-202.
67 67IND2014Learn
StraRead
Nurlaelawati, I. & Dzulqolah, S. (2014). Reading aloud
strategies in reading English text. Indonesian Journal
of Applied Linguistics 3(2), pp. 89-99.
68 68IND2014Learn
StyRead
Miqawati, A. H. & Sulistyo, G. H. (2014). The PQRST
strategy, reading comprehension and learning style.
Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1), pp.
123-139.
69 69IND2015Att
Tyas, A. S. P. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards spoken
English competence test (TKBI) at university level. A
Thesis. Sanata Dharma University.
70 70IND2015Mot
Mali, Y. C. G. (2015). Motivation factors in the Indonesian
EFL writing classroom. Bahasa & Sastra 15(1), pp. 1-
11.
71 71IND2015BelLe
arnStra
Hayati, N. (2015). A study of English language learning
beliefs, strategies, and English academic achievement
of the ESP students of STIENAS Samarinda.
Dinamika Ilmu 15(2), pp. 297-323.
72 72IND2015Learn
StraSpeak
Jazadi, I. (2015). An oral discourse perspective on second
language learning. Indonesian Journal of English
Education (IJEE) 2(2), pp. 133-144
73 73IND2015AttM
ot
Susandi, N. K. A. & Khaerun, T. (2015). Attitude toward
teachers, motivation and learning achievement: The
case of Indonesian EFL students. Linguistika 22(42),
pp. 76-93.
74 74IND2016Perc
Wri
Susanti, R. (2016). Students’ perceptions towards the
effective feedback practices in the large EFL writing
class based on students’ English proficiency level.
Journal of Advances in Linguistics 6(3), pp. 1063-
1069.
75 75IND2016AttLis
t
Hanafi. (2016). The effect of discovery learning method
application on increasing students’ listening outcome
and social attitude. Dinamika Ilmu 16(2), pp. 291-306.
76 76IND2016Perc
Meth
Cahyono, B. Y. & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2016). Indonesian
EFL teachers’ familiarity with and opinion on the
internet-based teaching of writing. English Language
Teaching 9(1), pp. 199-208.
77 77IND2016PercP
ron
Moedjito. (2016). The teaching of English pronunciation:
Perceptions of Indonesian school teachers and
university students. English Language Teaching 9(6),
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
110
No. Entry Code Full Identity
pp. 30-41.
78 78IND2016Learn
Stra
Setiyadi, B., Sukirlan, M. & Mahpul. (2016). How
successful learners employ learning strategies in an
EFL setting in the Indonesian context. English
Language Teaching 9(8), pp. 28-38.
79 79IND2016PercP
ref
Haryanto, E., Sulistryo, U., Khairani, M. & Wulan, R.
(2016). Indonesian or English? EFL student teachers’
preference and perception on the language use in the
classroom. Indonesian Journal of English Education
(IJEE) 3(1), pp. 46-59.
80 80IND2016Hon
Djiwandono, P. I. (2016). Character education in content
course: Self-scoring as a means for developing honesty
in students. TEFLIN Journal 27(2), pp. 153-165.
81 81ECC2010AttM
ot
Nikolaou, A. (2010). Attitudes and motivation of Greek
secondary pupils towards English. GALA A Advances
in Research on Language Acquisition and Teaching,
pp. 349-361.
82 82ECC2011Mot
Bahous, R., Bacha, N. N. & Nabhani, M. (2011).
Motivating students in the EFL classroom: A case
study of persperctives. English Language Teaching
(ELT) 4(3), pp. 33-43.
83 83ECC2014Tol
Fahrutdinova, R. A. (2014). English language in the
development of a tolerant person of the student in a
multi-ethnic educational environment of the university
(For example, Kazan Federal university). English
Language Teaching (ELT) 7(12), pp. 77-84).
84 84ECC2015AttM
ot
Adachi, R. (2015). Motivation and communivative attitudes
among Japanese EFL pupils. Indonesian Journal of
Applied Linguistics 5(1), pp. 1-10.
85 85ECC2015AttM
ot
Linh, N. T. H & Nhung, N. P. (2015). Vietnamese students’
motivation and attitude towards learning English
idiom. The 62nd International Conference (pp. 641-
655).
86 86ECC2012Bel
Alsamaani, A. S. (2012). Assessing Saudi learners’ beliefs
about English language learning. International Journal
of English and Education (IJEE) 1(2), pp. 31-55.
87 87ECC2015AttTe
st
Kashani, A. F., Soleimani, H., & Javadi, A. (2013).
Exploring L2 learners’ attitudes towards high-stakes
and low-stakes tests. International Journal of English
and Education (IJEE)2(4), pp. 40-64.
88 88ECC2014BelM
eth
Sevik, M. (2014). Young EFL learner beliefs about
classroom songs. International Journal of English and
Education (IJEE) 3(1), pp. 50-59.
89 89ECC2015Perc
Afshinfar, J. (2015). Students’ perceptions toward weblogs
in an EFL class. International Journal of English and
Education (IJEE) 4(4), pp. 237-247.
90 90ECC2015Perc
Rezaie, M. & Sayadian, S. (2015). The teachers’
perceptions of technology integration in EFL classes.
International Journal of English and Education (IJEE)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
111
No. Entry Code Full Identity
4(4), pp. 357-369.
91 91OCC2009AttM
ot
Bidin, S., Jusoff, K., & Aziz, N. A. (2009). Motivation and
attitude in learning English among UiTM students in
the northern region of Malaysia. English Language
Teaching 2(2), pp. 16-20.
92 92OCC2013AttM
ot
Muftah, M. & Galea, S. R. (2013). Language learning
motivation among Malaysian pre-university students.
English Language Teaching 6(3), pp. 92-103.
93 93OCC2013Att
Bhaskar, C. V. & Soundiraraj, S. (2013). A study on change
in the attitude of students towards English language
learning. English Language Teaching 6(5), pp. 111-
116.
94 94OCC2015Lear
nStra
Chuin, T. K. & Kaur, S. (2015). Types of language learning
strategies used by tertiary English majors. TEFLIN
Journal 26(1), pp. 17-35.
95 95OCC2015Bel
Mokhtar, M. M. (2015). Lecturers’ and students’ beliefs in
code-switching: A Malaysian polytechnic context.
TEFLIN Journal 26(1), pp. 85-96.
96 96ICC2012Att
Ting, C. & Gilmore, L. (2012). Attitudes of preservice
teachers towards teaching deaf and ESL students.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37(12), pp.
46-56.
97 97ICC2011Att Navarro-villarroel, C. (2011). Young students’ attitudes
toward languages. A Thesis. Iowa State University.
98 98ICC2015Bel
Farrel, T. S. & Ives, J. (2015). Exploring teacher beliefs and
classroom practices through reflective practice: A case
study. Language Teaching Reseacrh 19(5), pp. 594-
610.
99 99ICC2015Att
Ata, A. W. (2015). Knowledge, education, and attitudes of
international students to IELTS: A case study of
Australia. Journal of International Students 5(4), pp.
488-500.
100 100ICC2015Bel
Filatov, K. & Pill, S. (2015). The relationship between
university learning experiences and English teaching
self-efficacy: Perspectives of five-final-year pre-
service English teachers. Australian Journal of
Teacher Education 40(6), pp. 33-59.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
112
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
113
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
114
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
115
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
116
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
117
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
118
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
119
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
120
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
121
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
122
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
123
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
124
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
125
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
126
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
127
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
128
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
129
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
130
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
131
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
132
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
133
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
134
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
135
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
136
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
137
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
138
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
139
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
140
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
141
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
142
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
143
Appendix 2: Table of the Content of the Investigated Research Reports (cont.)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI