Introduction To Modeling Dynamics: Automotive Applications · Introduction To Modeling Dynamics:...

31
Introduction To Modeling Dynamics: Automotive Applications Joe DeRose Powertrain NVH R&D Ford Motor Company G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE 4/7/2009 Not job 1 representative. Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Transcript of Introduction To Modeling Dynamics: Automotive Applications · Introduction To Modeling Dynamics:...

Introduction To Modeling Dynamics: Automotive Applications

Joe DeRosePowertrain NVH R&DFord Motor Company

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 2

Overview

• Introduction To Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Applications

• Advanced Applications

• CAE Challenges

• Summary

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 3

Introduction

• Education– Michigan State University

• B.S. Mechanical Engineering, 1993• B.S. Computer Science, 1993• M.S. Mechanical Engineering, 1996• Ph.D. Mechanical Engineering, 1998

– Large scale topology optimization

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 4

Introduction

• Work Experience– Ford Motor Company, 1999 to present

• Powertrain NVH Research and Development– Cross functional optimization

• Vehicle Dynamics– Development– CAE

• Durability and NVH CAE Development– Cross functional optimization– CAE method development

– Engineering consultant

– Adjunct faculty in ME at LTU

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 5

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Goal– Represent a physical system with an

analytical model– Analytical model consists of a collection of

rigid bodies and building blocks

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 6

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• General concepts– Rigid bodies

• Mass, CG and inertia

– Constraints• Revolute, spherical, etc…

– Connectors• Springs and dampers

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 7

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Solution strategy– Step 1: Use Newton’s 2nd Law to develop a

system of 2nd order differential equations

wrurusuuu

busu

FzzkzzkzzbzmFzzkzzbzM

=−+−−−−=−+−+

)()()()()(

&&&&

&&&&

∑ = zMFz &&

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 8

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Solution strategy– Step 2: Convert the system of 2nd order

differential equations to a system of 1st order differential equations

BUAXX +=&

MatrixInput :Matrices Space State:,

Vector) State d/dt(:Vector State:

UBA

XX&

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 9

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Solution strategy– Step 3: Determine a numerical solution to the

system of 1st order differential equations

– Available tools• Matlab / Simulink / Maple / MathCAD• Classical Numerical Methods• ADAMS• veDYNA• LMS Virtual Lab / DADS

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 10

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Quarter-car model– Sinusoidal road input (0.1m @ 1.0 Hz)– Time response

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 11

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Quarter-car model– Sinusoidal road input (0.1m @ 10.0 Hz)– Time response

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 12

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Quarter-car model– Sinusoidal road input (0.1m @ 20.0 Hz)– Time response

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 13

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Quarter-car model– Frequency response

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 14

Rigid Body Dynamics Modeling

• Use analytical model to– Predict dynamic response– Investigate parameter sensitivity– Optimize

• Benefits– $$$: CAE modeling not prototypes– Design evaluations– Six sigma, robustness and reliability

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 15

Applications

• Chassis Design / Vehicle Dynamics

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 16

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Goal– For a given vehicle modify the

rear suspension design to improve vehicle turn-in cornering response without degrading limit handling

• Decrease rear compliance understeer

• Increase roll understeer

• Constraints– Base design already

determined– Allowed to modify only a few

hard points and suspension bushing rates

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 17

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Design variables– Hardpoints

• LCA at body vertical• LCA at axle lateral

– Bushing Rates• LCA at body• LCA at axle

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 18

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Solution method– Design of Experiments (DOEs)

• Systematic/mathematical methods for the investigation of processes and systems

– Planning and conducing experiments– Analyzing results

– DOEs Goals• Design space exploration• Identify parameter sensitivities• Optimize design

– Often associated with Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

• Develop a surrogate model

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 19

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Design of experiments phases– Phase 0: Screening experiment

• Determine which parameters are important and unimportant• Often investigate large range of variables

– Phase 1: Initial response surface• Determine if the ranges of the design variables are

appropriate

– Phase 2: Optimization (with RSM)• Focus on tighter ranges of the design variables (operability

region) and optimize

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 20

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Example response surfaces

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 21

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• ResultsRear Wheel Lateral Compliance Steer Angle (deg/kN)

Compliance Understeer

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 22

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• ResultsRoll Motion Rear Wheel Steer Angle (deg/deg roll)

Roll Understeer

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 23

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Summary– Lower control arm to rear axle hardpoint most

significant factor in achieving the desired response

– Design of Experiments• Successfully implemented to identify relevant

parameters• Design variable sensitivities found requiring

minimal design time

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 24

Applications – Vehicle Dynamics

• Vehicle dynamic response

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 25

Applications – Driveline/Axle Design

Dynamic response

andmodal

separation

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 26

Applications – Valve Train Design

• Engine valve train design– Inputs

• Cam lobe profile• Valve spring design

– Preload, surge frequency

– Outputs• Intake/exhaust behavior• Valve open and close

accelerations/forces– Goals

• Minimize weight• Maximize durability• Robust to manufacturing variation

and operating conditions

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 27

Advanced Applications

• Differential gear contact stresses and noise (flexible bodies)

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 28

Advanced Applications

• Vehicle dynamics with control systems

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 29

Advanced Applications

• Vehicle dynamics with control systems

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 30

CAE Challenges

• Simulations versus real life…

G. DeRose Jr. / GDEROSE4/7/2009

Not job 1 representative.Hardcopies are uncontrolled.

Page 31

Summary

• Go State!

• Rigid body dynamics and system response– Time domain and frequency important

• Rigid body dynamics applications– Vast, companies need help…

• Advanced applications– Growth area

• CAE challenges– Solutions needed, applicants apply