Introduction to Microeletromechanical Systems (MEMS) · PDF fileIntroduction to...
Transcript of Introduction to Microeletromechanical Systems (MEMS) · PDF fileIntroduction to...
11
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Introduction toMicroeletromechanical Systems
(MEMS)Lecture 10 Topics
• Piezoelectric Effect and PiezoelectricityPiezoelectric MaterialsApplications – Scanning Probe Microscopy
Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM)Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
MEMS Overview
Micromachining: lithography, deposition, etching, …
Processes & Foundries
Devices & Structures
Methodology
History & Market
Introduction &
Background
22
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Piezoelectric EffectPiezoelectricity: forces applied
to a segment of material lead to the appearance of electrical charge on the surfaces of the segment.
The source of this phenomenon is the specific distribution of electric charges in the unit cell of a crystal.
Si+
Si+Si+
O- O-
O-
+-
Si+
Si+Si+
O- O-
O-
+
-F F
+ + + +
- - - -
Quartz (SiO2)
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
PiezoelectricityForce deforms crystals and displaces
centers of positive and negative charge
Effect is reversible: applying voltages causes the piezo crystal to deform
Typical values for d in the pC/N range
Fx
zr
xzxxzxzz A
zFdCFd
CQV
dAEdAdFdQ
εε
εσ
0
:examplefor (matrix)t coefficieny sensitivit charge
===
====
VzAz
z
33
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Piezoelectricity: ExamplesApply Fx = 1N force on a 1cm × 1cm × 1mm
slab of PZT (lead zirconate titanate)
How much has the shape changed?Fz
1200 ,/370 ,/110
10
35.0
0
0
===
≈=
≈=
rzzxz
xr
zxzx
zr
zzzz
NpCdNpCd
VAxFdV
VAzFdV
εεε
εε
210 /103.8
12.0
mNE
nmEA
zFl
llEE
AF
z
zz
⋅=
≈=∆
∆=== εσ
Vz
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Piezoelectricity: Examples
Change in length per unit applied voltage:
PZT:
Note: ∆l is independent of l ! It only depends on the voltage ∆V, and on material properties
⇒ piezo stacks
∆zdEldl
ldFlA
QlC
Vl rrr εε
σεεεε 000 =∆
=∆
=∆∆
=∆∆
Vz
VnmdEV
l r /23.10 ≈=∆∆ εε
44
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Piezoelectric Materials
Material Type Piezoelectric Relative DepositionConstant Permittivity(pC/N) (εr)
Quartz single 2.33 4.5 growth, oxidationcrystal
PVDF polymer 20/2/-30 12 spin onBaTiO3 ceramic 78/190 1700PZT ceramic 110/370 1200 spin-onZnO metal 246 1400 sputter
oxide
[After Kovacs, 1998, p. 217]
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Scanning Probe Microscopy
Limitations of optical microscopy / lithography:• Resolution (wavelength)• Complexity / cost increases with decreasing scale
Instead: use scanningprobe with extremely sharp tip (“aperture-lessmicroscopy”)
55
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Scanning Probe Microscopy
Advantages:• Not limited by optics / wavelengths• Measure topography, and a wide range of phenomena
such as electrostatic, magnetic, capillary, van der Waalsforces, friction, conductivity, …
Disadvantages:• Contact with sample• Precise feedback required• Very sharp tips required (µm … nm)• Image convolution
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Scanning Probe MicroscopyTip Shape
Image convolution:let A be the sample surfacelet B be the tip surfacethen A ⊕ (-B) is the image that we observe when scanning B over A
Definition: A ⊕ (-B) = a-b | a∈Aand b∈B(“Minkovski sum”)
Question: Can we reconstruct Afrom A ⊕ (-B) and B ?
Convoluted Feature
Original Feature
66
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Scanning Tunneling Microscope
(G. Binnig and H. Rohrer, IBM Zürich, Switzerland, Nobel Prize in Physics, 1986)
The electron cloud associated with surface atoms extends a small distance above the surface. When a very sharp tip is brought sufficiently close to such a surface, there is a strong interaction between the electron cloud on the surface and that of the tip atom.
When a small voltage is applied, an electric tunneling current flows. At a separation of a few atomic diameters, the tunneling current rapidly increases as the distance between the tip and the surface decreases.
Tunneling current:
1nm) (typical separation face tip/sur0.5eV) (typicalheight barrier ng tunneli
)nmeV25.10 (typicalfactor conversion
geometry and materials on dependingfactor scaling 21
0
)(0
z
IeII z
φβ
φβ
−
−=
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
PiezoActuator
controller
Vt
STM
Tunneling current is extremely sensitive to distance z:
z = 1nm I = 7.1 10-4 I0
z = 0.1nm I = 0.48 I0
Feedback control for positioning of cantilever / tip to keep tunneling current constant.
Control signal gives extremely accurate position sensing (up to 0.001 Å)
)(0
zeII φβ−=
77
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Noise
• Johnson Noise: thermal noise across a resistor
White noise with flat frequency spectrumObeys Gaussian distributionReason: Brownian motion
• Shot Noise: fluctuations in current due to charge quanta
White Gaussian noise
Johnson and Shot noise set limitations on performance of STMs
bandwidth resistance
re temperatuabsolute constant sBoltzmann'J/K 101.38
4)(23-
fRTk
fkTRVrmsV nRnoise
∆
⋅=
∆==
bandwidth currentsteady
chargeelectron C1060.1
2)(19-
fIq
fqIIrmsI
dc
dcnRnoise
∆
⋅=
∆==
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Noise - Sample Calculations
• Johnson Noise: probe at room temperature
• Shot Noise: calculate the ratio between noise and current response.
eV5.0nmeV25.10
A1C1060.1
Å108.72:
21
19-
-7
=Φ=
=⋅=
⋅=
Φ
∆=
−β
µ
β
dc
dc
dcdcnR
Iq
HzIfqI
dzdII
bandwidth M1
300K constant sBoltzmann'J/K 101.38
HzµV1.04)(
23-
fRTk
fkTRVrmsV nRnoise
∆Ω=
=⋅=
=∆==
88
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
STM Gallery
Single atoms were accurately placed with an STM tip
[“The Beginning” Xenon on Nickel (110), Eigler, IBM Zürich, 1990]“Atom” Iron on Copper (111)
[Lutz and Eigler, IBM Zürich]
[“Carbon Monoxide Man” Carbon Monoxide on Platinum (111), Lutz and Eigler, IBM Zürich]
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Micro STM
• Integration of 3D (xyz) actuators and tips
• MicroinstrumentationHigh Speed Scanning (kHz - MHz)High sensitivity Microvolume (< 1 mm3) instrumentsMicroanalytic and lithographic instruments
• Massively Parallel ArchitecturesMolecular manipulationTerabit information storagenm-scale patterning and machining
[Yang Xu, Scott A. Miller and Noel C. MacDonald 1995]
99
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
MEMS STMTwo Micro-STM Designs Have Been Fabricated
• Single Crystal Silicon (SCS) XYZ Actuators- Lateral (xy) motion provided by comb drives- Vertical (z) motion provided by torsional drive
• Integrated SCS Tip
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
MEMS STM• The tunneling tip is fabricated along with the mechanical scanning stage
• The single crystal silicon tip may be silicided or metal-coated
Tip Dimensions:Height = 5 µmShank Diameter = 1 µmTip Radius ≤ 10 nm
Lateral Motion:Applied Voltage = 40 VDisplacement = 3.2 µm
Lateral Displacement of the tipClose-up of the tip on the stage
1010
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
MEMS STMImage Acquisition With The Micro-STM
• STM images acquired using commercial STM control electronics
• Z-Positioning of the tip provided by the torsional cantilever
SEM image of test sample Micro-STM image of test sample
200 nm
100 nm
0 nm0 nm
100 nm
200 nm0 nm
295 nm
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
MEMS STM
Applications:• Imaging with atomic resolution• Data storage: 1012 bits/mm2
• Sub-nanometer lithography
Problems:• Conductive material only• Tunneling current required• Brownian motion (cooling)
1111
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Atomic Force Microscope
Similar to STM, but use forces (at atomic level) instead of tunneling current for feedback
Requires force feedback, usually with cantilever spring, and laser optical deflection detection or piezoresistors
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
AFM
Advantages:• Can be used in contact mode (atomic / ionic
repulsion forces) or non-contact mode (> 10 Å; van der Waals, electrostatic, magnetic, capillary forces)
• Non-destructive probing:Spring constants down to 1mN/m = 10-13 N/Å(compare with covalent bond 10-9 N)Motion controllable down to 1/1000 of atomic radius
• Different environments:VacuumAirLiquid
1212
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Piezoresistive AFM
Tortenese et al. 1991: first AFM with integrated piezo force sensor• Scan generator moves sample in x and y direction• Controller adjusts z motion to keep atomic force constant
Piezo
scan generatorscan generator
feedback controlfeedback control
monitormonitor
x,yx,y
z
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Piezoresistive AFM
N .F
PfkT
VfkTR
RR
zwLbLL
LLEtb
Fwt
LLRR
wLbLLwbEtK
-10min
min
32
32
31
211
2211
1
32
32
31
3
1045 :force Minimum
442
:signal detectable Minimum
)3)((4)(3
4)(3
:resistance in change Relative
3)(
:constant Spring
=
∆=
∆=
∆
+−−
=
−==
∆
+−=
π
πσπ
w
L1 L2
b
(Binding Force of a covalent bond: 10-9N)
1313
Texas Christian University Department of Engineering Ed Kolesar
Scanning Probe Microscopes
The invention of the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) 15 years ago has produced new family of proximal probes:
• Atomic force microscope (AFM)• Scanning thermal microscopes• Scanning capacitance microscopes• Magnetic force microscopes• Surface probing and analytical tools for a wide variety of
phenomena and materials• Nanoassembly, nanomanipulators, and nanorobots• Nanolithography• Ultra-high density storage: towards pick-and-place of single
atoms as bits