Introduction to Insertion Devices - CERN...P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 2/46 What...

46
P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 1/46 Introduction to Insertion Devices Pascal ELLEAUME European Synchrotron Radiation Facility Grenoble, France

Transcript of Introduction to Insertion Devices - CERN...P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 2/46 What...

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 1/46

    Introduction to Insertion DevicesPascal ELLEAUME

    European Synchrotron Radiation FacilityGrenoble, France

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 2/46

    What is an Insertion Device ?

    - Insertion Devices are also called Undulators and Wigglers- Can be 1 to 20 m long, (typical 5 m ) with a small magnetic gap (5-15 mm)- Intense Source of Synchrotron Radiation in e- Storage Ring Sources- Control of damping times in Electron Colliders (LEP, CESR,…)

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 3/46

    Table of Content

    • Beam Dynamics

    • Radiation

    • Technology

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 4/46

    Beam Dynamics

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 5/46

    Electron Trajectory in an Insertion Device

    : , x z sAssume v v v c = − −

    '

    ( ) ( ') '

    ( ) ( '') '' '

    sxz

    s s

    z

    v s e B s dsc mc

    ex s B s ds dsmc

    γ

    γ

    −∞

    −∞ −∞

    = −

    = −

    ∫ ∫and similar expression for ( ) and ( )zv s z s

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 6/46

    Electron Trajectory in a Planar Sinusoidal Undulator

    00

    ( 0, sin(2 ), 0 )sConsider B Bλ

    = π

    0

    2 22

    0

    0

    0

    cos(2 )

    0

    11 (1 cos (2 ))2

    sin (2 )2

    x

    z

    s

    v K scvcv sKc

    K sx

    γ λ

    γ λλ

    γ λ

    = π

    =

    = − + π

    − ππ

    0 00 0 0.0934 [ ] [ ]2

    eBK B T mmmcλ λ= =

    π

    Example : ESRF , Energy= 6GeV , Undulator λ0 = 35 mm, B0 = 0.7 T

    => K = 2.3, Kγ= 200 µrad,

    λ02π

    Kγ= 1.1 µm !!

    with

    K is a fundamental parameter called : Deflection Parameter

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 7/46

    201 1

    2zz ID

    eBK ds LF mcγ

    ⎛ ⎞= = ⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠∫

    00 0

    00 0

    0

    cosh(2 ) cos(2 )

    sinh(2 ) sin(2 )

    x

    z

    s

    Bz sB B

    z sB B

    π πλ λ

    π πλ λ

    =

    =

    = −

    Undulator Field Satisfying Maxwell Equation

    dvm ev Bdt

    γ = ×

    Lorentz Force Equation

    2nd Order in 1 γ −

    ( )

    2

    2

    2220 0

    20

    0

    1 sinh(4 )2 4 z

    d xds

    eBd z z K zds mc

    λ πγ π λ

    =

    ⎛ ⎞= − −⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠

    A vertical Field Undulator is Vertically Focusing !

    201

    2zeBKmcγ

    ⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟

    ⎝ ⎠

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 8/46

    Interference with the beam dynamics in the ring lattice

    • An Insertion Device is the first component of a photon beamline. Its field setting is fully controlled by the Users of the beamline . The beam dynamics in the whole ring may be altered if the field of an ID is changed => crosstalk of the source parameters in each beamline must be avoided .

    • As far as the lattices are concerned, Insertion devices should ideally behave like drift space but the reality is somewhat different :

    – Closed Orbit distortion (non zero field integrals generated by design and field errors) – Tune shift (induced by nominal field and by field errors)– Reduction of dynamic aperture (=>Lifetime reduction & reduced injection efficiency ) induced by

    varying focusing properties inside the aperture for the beam => critical for modern sources operating in topping-up mode.

    – Very high field IDs may change the damping time, emittance , energy spread …

    • By combining field shimming and local steering corrections, most of the perturbations are able to be solved.

    • The problem of the reduction of dynamic aperture is severest on low energy rings with many insertion devices.

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 9/46

    Radiation from IDs

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 10/46

    Electron bunchSynchrotron light

    Electrons

    Bending Magnet

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 11/46

    Critical Energy of Bending Magnet Radiation

    140x10 12

    120

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0

    Phot

    ons/

    s/.1

    %/m

    rad2

    120100806040200Photon Energy [keV]

    Computed for 6 GeV, I = 200 mA, B =1 tesla

    Electric Field in the Time Domain Angular Flux in Frequency Domain

    323 3

    4 4chc heE B

    mγ γ

    π ρ π= =

    600x10 3

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    0

    Elec

    tric

    Fiel

    d

    140x10 -12120100806040200Distance

    23ABt Bcρ γγ

    ≈ ≈

    cE

    2[ ] 0.665 [ ] [ ]cE keV E GeV B T=

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 12/46

    Undulator

    e-

    Source Points

    1.5x10 6

    1.0

    0.5

    0.0

    -0.5

    -1.0

    -1.5

    Elec

    tric

    Fiel

    d

    1.4x10 -91.21.00.80.60.40.20.0

    Distance [m]

    A

    D

    C

    B A

    B

    C

    D

    Electric Field in Time DomainElectron trajectory

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 13/46

    Electric Field and Spectrum vs K

    1.5x10 6

    1.0

    0.5

    0.0

    -0.5

    -1.0

    -1.5

    Elec

    tric

    Fiel

    d

    1.4x10 -91.21.00.80.60.40.20.0

    Distance [m]

    K=1

    K=2

    Computed for 6 GeV, I=200 mA, 35 mm period

    7x10 15

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0Ph

    oton

    s/se

    c/0.

    1%/m

    rad2

    100806040200

    Photon Energy [keV]

    8x10 15

    6

    4

    2

    0Pho

    tons

    /sec

    /0.1

    %/m

    rad2

    100806040200

    Photon Energy [keV]

    2x10 6

    1

    0

    -1

    -2

    Elec

    tric

    Fiel

    d

    2.5x10 -92.01.51.00.50.0

    Distance [m]

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 14/46

    2x10 6

    1

    0

    -1

    -2

    Elec

    tric

    Fiel

    d

    2.5x10 -92.01.51.00.50.0

    Distance [m]

    Fundamental Wavelength of the Radiation Field

    λ

    22 20

    2

    20

    0 0 2

    2

    cos (1 )12 (1 (1 ))

    2 2

    (1 )2 2AC

    c KtK

    λθλ λ θ λ

    γ

    λ γ θγ

    = − ≅ − − ≅ + +− +

    e-

    θ

    0 cosλ θ

    AC

    0 02

    21(1 (1 ))

    2 2

    ACs

    tKv c

    λ λ

    γ

    = =< > − +

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 15/46

    Wavelength of the Harmonics

    02

    0 0

    , : , 1, 2,3,..:

    :

    : : 0.0934 [ ] [ ]

    :

    thn nE Wavelength Energy of the n harmonic

    n Harmonic numberUndulator period

    E mc Electron EnergyK Deflection Parameter B T mm

    Angle between observer direction and e

    λ

    λ

    γλ

    θ

    =

    ==

    − beam

    22 20

    2 (1 )2 2nK

    nλλ γ θγ

    = + +

    2

    22 2

    0

    9.5 [ ][ ][ ](1 )

    2

    nn E GeVE keV

    Kmmλ γ θ=

    + +

    In an equivalent manner , the energy En of the harmonics are given by

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 16/46

    Undulator Emission by a Filament Electron Beam6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    0

    x101

    5

    302520151050

    keVEnergy

    Flux in a Pinhole

    n=1

    n=3

    n=2 1EE nN∆

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.0

    T

    -0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15

    mAngle

    Flux in a Pinhole

    0

    ∆θ ≈1

    γ nN

    n : Harmonic number

    N : Number of Periods

    γ =1

    1− v2

    c 2

    =E

    mc2

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 17/46

    • Until now a Filament mono-energetic electron beam has been assumed.

    • What happens if the beam presents a finite emittance (size and divergence) and finite energy spread ?

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 18/46

    Filament e- Beam

    e- Beam withFinite Divergence

    1Nnγ

    'zσ∼

    'xσ∼

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 19/46

    400

    300

    200

    100

    x109

    2520151050

    keV

    Filament Mono energetic Beam

    ESRF Emittance and Energy Spread(4, nm, 0.02 nm, 0.1% )

    Electron BeamEnergy = 6 GeVCurrent = 200 mA UndulatorPeriod = 35 mmK = 2.2Length = 3.2 m Collection 10 x 10 µm

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 20/46

    Broadening of the Harmonics by the Electron Emittance

    200x10 9

    150

    100

    50

    0

    Phot

    /s/0

    .1%

    bw

    20keV151050

    Photon Energy

    Electron BeamEnergy = 6 GeVCurrent = 200 mAVert. Emitt= 0.04 nmEnergy Spread = 0.1 % UndulatorPeriod = 35 mmK = 2.2Length = 3.2 m Collection 10 x 10 µm

    Horiz Emitt.= 2 nm

    8 nm 4 nm

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 21/46

    Broadening of the Harmonics by Electron Energy Spread

    160x10 9

    140

    120

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0

    Phot

    /s/0

    .1%

    bw

    20keV151050

    Photon Energy

    Electron BeamEnergy = 6 GeVCurrent = 200 mAHor,z. Emitt. = 4 nmVert. Emitt= 0.04 nm UndulatorPeriod = 35 mmK = 2.2Length = 3.2 m Collection 10 x 10 µm

    Energy Spread = 0 %0.1 %

    0.2 %

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 22/46

    • To Make Optimum use of the Undulators, The magnet Lattices of synchrotron light sources are optimized to produce the smallest emittance and smallest energy spread of the electron beam possible.

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 23/46

    3.0x10 15

    2.5

    2.0

    1.5

    1.0

    0.5

    0.0

    Phot

    /s/0

    .1%

    bw

    8000eV600040002000

    Photon Energy

    Electron BeamEnergy = 6 GeVCurrent = 200 mAHoriz. Emitt. = 4 nmVert. Emitt= 0.04 nmEnergy Spread = 0.1 % UndulatorPeriod = 35 mmK = 2.2Length = 3.2 m

    8 x 8 mm

    5 x 5 mm

    3 x 3 mm

    1 x 1 mm

    Collecting Undulator Radiation in a variable Aperture

    F1 F3

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 24/46

    Maximum Spectral Flux On-axis on odd harmonics

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.0

    Qn(

    K)

    543210

    K

    n =1n =3 n =5

    n =7

    Fn [Ph /sec/ 0.1%] = 1.431 1014 N I[A ] Qn (K )

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 25/46

    Brilliance ( or Brightness)

    Bn =Fn

    (2π)2ΣxΣ'x Σ zΣ' z

    Σx = σx2 + λnL

    (2π)2

    Σ'x= σ 'x2 + λn

    2L

    Electron beam Single electron emission

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 26/46

    Brilliance vs Photon Energy

    1018

    1019

    1020

    1021

    1022

    Phot

    /s/0

    .1%

    bw/m

    m2 /m

    r2

    3 4 5 6 7 8 910keV

    2 3 4

    Photon Energy

    UndulatorPeriod = 35 mmK = 2.2Length = 5 m

    UndulatorPeriod = 26 mmK = 1.2Length = 5 m

    ESRF Energy = 6 GeVCurrent = 200 mAEmittances = 4 & 0.02 nmLow Beta Straight

    Bn =Fn

    (2π)2ΣxΣ'x Σ zΣ' z

    Σx = σx2 + λnL

    (2π)2

    Σ'x= σ 'x2 + λn

    2L

    with

    n = 1

    n = 3n = 5

    n = 1

    n = 3

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 27/46

    200x1012

    150

    100

    50

    0

    Phot

    ons/s

    ec/0

    .1%

    35302520151050

    600x1012

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    0

    Phot

    ons/

    sec/

    0.1%

    35302520151050

    1 .0x1015

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    Phot

    ons/

    sec/

    0.1%

    3 5302520151050

    Angle Integrated Flux

    K=0.5 K=1

    K=2 For Large K, the angle integrated spectrum from an Undulator tends toward that of a bending magnet x 2N=> Such Devices are called Wigglers

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 28/46

    Technology

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 29/46

    Technology of Undulators and Wigglers

    • The fundamental issue in the magnetic design of a planar undulator or wiggler is to produce a periodic field with a high peak field B and the shortest period λ0 within a given aperture (gap).

    • Three type of technologies can be used :– Permanent magnets ( NdFeB , Sm2Co17 )– Room temperature electromagnets – Superconducting electromagnets

    Gap

    Period

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 30/46

    Current Equivalent of a Magnetized Material

    M

    0

    [ ]Air coil with Surface Current Density[A/m] rB Tµ

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 31/46

    Periodic Array of Magnets

    0

    0

    2

    0

    2 [ ]Surface Current Density[A/m]

    4 [ ]or Current Density[A/m ]

    r

    r

    B T

    B T

    µ

    µ λ

    2r 0

    2r 0

    Examples:B =1 T , λ =20 mm Equiv. Current Density=160A/mm !!

    B =1 T , λ =400 mm Equiv. Current Density=8 A/mm

    ~ 95 % of Insertion Devices are made of Permanent Magnets !!

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 32/46

    Permanent Magnet Undulator

    Magnet (NdFeB, Sm2Co17,...)

    Pole(Steel)

    Pure Permanent MagnetHybrid

    0.1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6789

    1

    2

    Mag

    netic

    Fie

    ld [T

    ]

    1.00.80.60.40.2Gap / λ0

    Magnet Volume = 2 N λ03

    Lx Magnet = 2 λ0 First Harmonic Peak Field

    Hybrid (Vanadium Permendur)

    Pure Permanent Magnet

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 33/46

    Support StructureStepper Motors90˚ Gear Box

    Springs

    Ball Bearing Leadscrew

    Upper Girder

    Lower Girder

    Height & TiltAdjustment

    Welded Framework

    Guiding Rails

    Mechanical Stop

    Dovetail to FixMagnetic Assemblies

    Must Handle :Magnetic Force : 1-20 TonsGap Resolution : < 1 µmParallellism < 20 µm

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 34/46

    • For a permanent magnet undulator , shrinking all dimensions maintains the field unchanged. The peak field Bp ~ Br F(gap/period)

    • Benefits of using small gaps Insertion Devices :– Decrease the volume of material (cost driving) ~ gap3

    – The lower the gap, the higher the energy of the harmonics of the undulator emission => the lower the electron energy required to reach the same photon energy

    • The most advanced undulators have magnet blocks in the vacuum with an operating magnetic gap of 4-6 mm

    Undulators are Fundamentally Small Gap Devices

    202 (1 )2 2

    Kλλγ

    = + 0 0 2eBwith K

    mcλ

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 35/46

    In Vacuum Permanent Magnet Undulators

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 36/46

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 37/46

    Application : Build a pure permanent magnetundulator with NdFeB Magnets (Br = 1.2 T)

    8.210.315.2

    Fundamental [keV]@ 6 GeV

    8.27.36.0

    ElectronEnergy [GeV]

    Fund = 15.2 keV

    282215

    Period[mm]

    0.38150.49100.725

    B [T]

    Gap [mm]

    Undulator with K=1

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 38/46

    Electro-Magnet Undulator

    Current Densities < 5-20 A/mm2

    Lower fieldthan permanent magnetFor small period / gap

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 39/46

    Superconducting Wigglers

    - High field : up to 10 T => Shift the spectrum to higher energies- Complicated engineering & High costs

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 40/46

    Magnetic Field Errors in Permanent Magnet Insertion Devices :

    • Field errors originate from :– Non uniform magnetization of the magnet blocks (poles).– Dimensional and Positional errors of the poles and magnet blocks. – Interaction with environmental magnetic field (iron frame, earth field,…)

    • Important to use highly uniform magnetized blocks– perform a systematic characterization of the magnetization – Perform a pairing of the blocks to cancel errors– Still insufficient …

    • Two main type of field errors remain– Multipole Field Errors (Normal and skew dipole, quadrupole, sextupole,…). – Phase errors which reduce the emission on the high harmonic numbers – Further corrections :

    • Active steerers• Shimming

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 41/46

    Shimming

    • Mechanical Shimming : – Moving permanent magnet or iron pole vertically or horizontally– Best when free space and mechanical fixation make it possible.

    • Magnetic Shimming : – Add thin iron piece at the surface of the blocks– Reduce minimum gap and reduce the peak field

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 42/46

    Magnetic shims

    Phase Shim

    Phase Shim

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 43/46

    Field Integral and Multipole Shimming

    Horizontal DeflectionQuadrupoleSextupole …

    Vertical DeflectionSkew QuadrupoleSkew sextupole …

    Gap/2 [mm]

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 44/46

    Tp Tp+1 Tp+2

    Harmonic # 4

    Harmonic # 1

    The Phase shimming consists of a set of local magnetic field corrections, which make Tp always identical.

    2

    2

    0 (1 )2

    pcT

    λ=

    +

    Tp varies from one pole to the next due to period and peak field fluctuations

    Tp : time distance between successive peaks

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 45/46

    Phase Shimming and the single electron spectrum

    500

    400

    300

    200

    100

    0

    x101

    5

    6050403020100-10keV

    BeforeShimming

    AfterShimming

  • P. Elleaume, CAS, Trieste October 2 - 14, 2005 46/46

    • I hope that this short introduction has incited your curiosity in the broad and exciting field that is Insertion Devices.

    • Bibliography – J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Chapter 14, John Wiley– K.J. Kim, Characteristics of Synchrotron Radiation, AIP Conference Proceedings 184, vol.

    1 p567 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989).– R.P. Walker , CAS - CERN Accelerator School: Synchrotron Radiation and Free Electron

    Lasers, Grenoble, France, 22 - 27 Apr 1996 , CERN 98-04 p 129.– H. Onuki, P. Elleaume “Undulators, Wigglers and their Applications”, Taylor and Francis,

    2003, ISBN 0 415 28040 0.– A. Hofman, “The Physics of Synchrotron Radiation”, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    ISBN 0 521 30826 7– J. A. Clarke , “The Science and Technology of Undulators and Wigglers, Oxford Science

    Publications, 2004. ISBN 0 19 850855 7– S. Russenschuck, “Electromagnetic Design and Mathematical Optimization Methods

    in Magnet Technology”, ebook available from “http://russ.home.cern.ch/russ/”