Intro to Study of Law 2014 - Knutsen-Dufraimont

20
Introduction to the Study of Law Professors Lisa Dufraimont and Erik Knutsen (2014)

description

intro to study of law

Transcript of Intro to Study of Law 2014 - Knutsen-Dufraimont

  • Introduction

    to the Study of Law

    Professors Lisa Dufraimont and Erik Knutsen

    (2014)

  • What is Law?

    A body of rules and principles

    Laws governs conduct and can be enforced

    Laws bind individuals

    e.g., an offender can be punished through criminal law, or a

    tradesperson may owe damages for breaching a contract

    Laws also bind institutions

    e.g., a government may be required to act (or refrain from

    acting)

  • Substance vs. Procedure

    Substantive Law

    governs rights and

    obligations in the world

    property, torts, contracts

    criminal law

    family law

    corporate law

    Procedural Law

    governs legal processes

    how a case moves through

    the courts

    civil procedure

    criminal procedure

    evidence

  • Public vs. Private (Civil) Law

    Public Law Private (Civil) Law

    individuals rights with the state rights between individuals

    criminal law tort law

    constitutional law contract law

    administrative law property law

  • Private and Public Wrongs

    Civil Wrongs Torts Criminal Offences

    private (2 individuals) public (state vs. individual)

    goal is to compensate goal is to punish and deter

    proof: balance of proof: beyond a reasonable

    probabilities doubt

    6 jurors 12 jurors

    plaintiff vs. defendant prosecutor vs. accused

  • Example: Lac Mgantic

  • Learning the Law

    case method:

    stare decisis (like cases decided alike)

    precedent

    participation

    skills

    the point methodology

    process, not rules

    note taking and active listening

  • Learning the Law in Class

    come prepared (read, digested, ready to participate)

    cases will be discussed in your classes

    the material in the cases are the means through which

    the lawyers thinking process evolves

    often not just about getting the rule

    about how do I use these materials as a lawyer? (analysis and analogic reasoning)

  • How to Read A Case

    1. Who are the parties?

    2. Court, Jurisdiction and Date of Decision When and where was it heard? Trial or appeal court?

    3. Procedural History What happened before? Trial or appeal?

    4. Material facts (what happened?) The facts that are necessary to apply to the legal rule

    5. Issues (what is the dispute about?)

    6. Legal rule applied or created by the court

    7. Holding (what did the court decide? Who won? Any dissent?)

    8. Reasoning (why did the court reach its decision?)

  • The Canadian Legal System

    (a quick trip)

  • Courtroom Characters

    Civil Action

    Plaintiff

    Defendant

    Lawyers:

    advocate for one party

    inform Court about facts AND law

    Judge

    Jury (sometimes)

    Witnesses

    speak to what happened

    Criminal Case

    The Queen

    Accused person

    Crown prosecutor:

    represents public

    Defence lawyer:

    advocates for accused

    Judge

    Jury (sometimes)

    Witnesses

    victim may be one

  • Sources of Law

    1. Constitution (and Charter)

    2. Legislation

    federal

    provincial

    3. Case law

    interpreting the Constitution

    interpreting legislation

    common law

  • Supreme Court of

    Canada

    Court of Appeal for

    Ontario

    Ontario Superior

    Court of Justice

    Ontario Court of

    Justice

    Federal

    Court of Appeal

    Federal Court

    (Trial Division)

    Ontario Divisional

    Court

    Government Agency

    Decision

  • Weight of Law

    1. Legislation

    2. Supreme Court of Canada

    3. Ontario Court of Appeal

    4. Ontario Divisional Court

    5. Ontario Superior Court

    6. Decisions from other Canadian

    provinces

    7. Foreign decisions

    Binding

    Binding or Degree

    of Persuasiveness

    Persuasive Only

  • Civility, Collegiality, and

    Respect important values of litigators

    my Friend, gowns

    sense of decorum in court

    duty to inform the Court of the law (even that law

    not helpful to your case)

    no duty to inform the Court of unfavourable facts

    guided by Rules of Professional Conduct

    Law Society of Upper Canada

  • Dos and Donts of Succeeding in Law School

    Dont be distracted by competition

    work with others you will all benefit

    there is room for everyone to succeed

    the grade curve will take care of itself

    Do think for yourself

    be skeptical of law school rumours about

    what professors or employers want

    learn to exercise your own judgment

  • Dos and Donts of Succeeding in Law School

    Do work hard, and consistently

    Do try to be engaged, interested,

    curious, even excited about law

    Do become actively involved in the

    life of the school

    Do know the law and have an

    opinion and know the difference

  • Legal Analysis and

    Legal Reasoning the fundamental law school skill;

    case analogy :

    compare and contrast facts and law

    how will a principle derived from a case (or set of cases)

    prompt a future court to react?

    how is your case distinguishable from opposing

    counsels use of the same case? (remember: opposing parties will be trying to rely on the same case but to get

    opposite results!)

    make your reasoning/thinking crystal clear.

    most important to explain why a case is applicable.

  • Who Are Your Professors?

    legal academics;

    teaching (40%), research (40%), service

    (20%);

    explore the boundaries of law through:

    academic research (publications),

    presentations;

    lawyer, judicial, and community education;

    pro bono work.

  • Enjoy Law School!