Intro to law and justice ch 3 ppt
-
Upload
mckenziewood -
Category
Law
-
view
31 -
download
2
Transcript of Intro to law and justice ch 3 ppt
MAKING LAW
• Code of Hammurabi• First known written legal code• Eye-for-an-eye philosophy
• Roman law• Influenced by Babylonian legal principles• The Twelve Tables (450 BCE)
• First entirely secular written legal code
• Criminal law began to change focus from just resolving disputes to seeing offenses as against society as a whole.
MAKING LAW
• Norman Conquest of England (1066) brought feudal law to England; basis for common law• By Henry II (1154–1189) a body of law was
developed and applied “commonly” through England.• Common-law system well developed in
England by the thirteenth century
The Common Law
MAKING LAW
Ranulf de Glanvill–Treatise on the Laws and Customs of the Realm of England, 1188• Details transition from substantive/irrational decision
making of pre-Norman England to adherence to formal legal rules
Magna Carta, 1215• Trial by jury, proportional punishment, self-incrimination
Henry de Bracton–On the Laws and Customs of England, 1250–1260• Discussed the “common law” and “judge-made law”
aspects of English law
The Common Law (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Judge-made law• Judges justified decision by referencing • Custom, tradition• History• Prior judicial decisions
•William Blackstone: Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1765–1769 (procedural law, substantive criminal law, torts, and contract law)• Laws were creations of God waiting to be discovered via use
of reason.• Organized common law into four parts:• Procedural law• Substantive criminal law• Tort law• Law of contracts
The Common Law (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Under common law, every final decision by a court creates a precedent.• Precedent governs the court issuing the decision
as well as any lower courts.• This system was brought from England to colonial
America.• In the United States, precedent is binding only on
those courts within the jurisdiction of the court issuing the opinion.
Precedent and Stare Decisis
MAKING LAW
• Stare decisis means “let the decision stand” (Black, 2001).• If there is a prior decision on a legal issue
germane to a current case, the court will be guided by that prior decision.• This is the principle behind establishing
precedent.• Ensures predictability for similar cases
Precedent and Stare Decisis (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Not every decision a court makes becomes precedent.• Ratio decidendi are legal pronouncements from
courts that become precedent• Rationale used by courts to arrive at their decisions• “The reason for the decision”
• Obiter dicta are non-legal statements or arguments used to support ratio decidendi; do not become precedent • “Things said by the way”
Precedent and Stare Decisis (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Precedent is not necessarily unchangeable.• Judge-made law may be overruled by an act of
the legislature.• The precedent-issuing court may overrule its prior
decision.• A higher court may reverse a lower court’s
decision.• A court may also distinguish one case from
another precedent-setting case on grounds that the details may be slightly different.
Precedent and Stare Decisis (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Judge-made law (common law)• Legislative law• Constitution• Statutes• Ordinances• Administrative regulations
• Other sources of appropriate conduct• Religion and ethics
Sources of Law
MAKING LAW
Sources of Law (cont.)
Constitution (Constitutional Law)
Legislative Statutes (Statutory Law)
Executive Agency Rules and Decisions(Administrative Law)
Judicial Cases (Common Law)
MAKING LAW
• Legislative enactments (bills) are statutes.• Collections of statutes are codes.• Includes both civil and criminal law• Criminal law referred to as the penal code
• Administrative regulations • Have the force of law• Issued by agencies of the executive branch or
created through legislatively delegated powers
Legislative Law
MAKING LAW
• Statutes are frequently written broadly.• Administrative agencies are given the
task of filling in the blanks. Why written so ambiguously?
1. Difficult to define something involving human conduct
2. Political implications and the need for compromise
Legislative Law (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Those rights that are possessed by the individual and that protect him or her from others as well as from the federal government• Federal and state constitutions• Case law• Court rules• Legislation
Sources of Individual Rights
MAKING LAW
• Articles of Confederation formed in 1781• Federal government powerless• Lacked authority to tax• Lacked authority to raise an army• Lacked authority to force states to comply with any
mandates
• Twelve of thirteen states met in Philadelphia in 1787 to replace the Articles of Confederation.
• Result was formation of the U.S. Constitution.
Sources of Individual Rights–Constitution
MAKING LAW
• Created a strong central government• Mostly concerned with establishing the
federal government’s powers and limitations • Protection from very few individual rights:
• Habeas corpus• Bills of attainder• Ex post facto laws
• Several states demanded more individual rights protection before ratifying Constitution.
• Result was the Bill of Rights (James Madison)• Ratified in 1791
Sources of Individual Rights–Constitution (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• First eight amendments set out twenty-three individual rights.
• Protections against government action• Only in the twentieth century were these
rights applied to state governments.
Sources of Individual Rights–Bill of Rights
MAKING LAW
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
First Amendment
MAKING LAW
Freedom of Religion1. Government shall not establish a
religion.2. Government shall not interfere with
individuals’ religious practices.• Essentially: government can neither
promote nor destroy religion.
First Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Freedom of Religion (cont.)• Establishment clause: “wall of separation
between church and state” (Everson v. Board of Education, 1947)
• Government can be involved in religion if:1. Statute must have secular purpose2. Primary purpose of the statute must be neither
pro- nor anti-religion3. The statute must not foster excessive
government entanglement with religion (Lemon v. Kurtzman, 1971)
First Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Freedom of Speech• Right to say things that anger others (including
hate speech)• Includes verbal, written, and certain physical
acts (aka symbolic speech or expressive conduct)• Signs• Picketing• Burning of the American flag
First Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Freedom of Speech (cont.)• Government can regulate obscenity. • Government can regulate speech likely
to provoke violence.• Commercial speech may be regulated
more than “political” speech.
First Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Second Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Intended to protect private citizens and groups of citizens (militias) to protect themselves from oppression by the federal government
• District of Columbia v. Heller (2008)• Second Amendment protects rights of
individual gun owners.• Militias are merely one of the reasons for the need of
the protection.• Regulations and restrictions still applicable
Second Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Third Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Product of its times• Makes the practice of housing soldiers in
private homes of individuals unconstitutional
Third Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Fourth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Stands most directly between the individual and the police
• In response to British practice of “general warrants”
• Fourth Amendment was an effort to limit the ability of police to interfere in private citizens’ lives• Required a reasonable amount of evidence (probable
cause)
• Does not preclude all searches and seizures, only those that are unreasonable• Begs the question: what is reasonable?
Fourth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Fifth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Rights associated with criminal trials, includes:• Indictment by grand jury• Freedom from double jeopardy• Right to due process and just compensation• Privilege against self-incrimination
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Grand Jury• A group of citizens whose members
listen to a case presented by a prosecutor
• This is done to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to try the defendant.
• Used to protect individuals from being tried without some proof of guilt
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Grand Jury (cont.)• Issue indictments
• A document formally charging a defendant with a crime
• This right does not apply to state trials. • Hurtado v. California (1884)• May use a prosecutorial “information”• Several states require grand jury
indictments.
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Double Jeopardy• Means that a jurisdiction may not:
1. Prosecute someone again for the same crime after the person has been acquitted
2. Prosecute someone again for the same crime after the person has been convicted
3. Punish someone twice for the same offense
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Double Jeopardy (cont.)• Does not mean that:1. A state may not try someone again if
the first trial ends in a mistrial or a hung jury
2. A state cannot retry someone if the conviction was overturned on appeal
3. A person cannot be tried under the doctrine of dual sovereignty
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Self-incrimination (Protection from Compelled Testimonial Communications)
• A defendant can refuse to speak to police about charged crime.
• Can refuse to speak at trial• Prosecution cannot comment on
defendant’s refusal to speak (Griffin v. California, 1965).
• Does not include • Blood samples, fingerprints, or line-up presence
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Due Process of Law• State must follow certain procedures. • Designed to protect individual rights• Whenever the deprivation of liberty or
property is in question The “Taking Clause”• Eminent domain–the seizing of private
property for public use• Kelo v. City of New London (2005)
Fifth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Sixth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Associated with criminal trial and includes:• Right to a speedy trial• Right to a public trial• Right to a trial by an impartial jury• Right to a notice of charges against oneself• Right to representation by counsel• Right to confront witnesses against oneself
Sixth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Right to a Speedy Trial• Defendant must be brought to trial
without “unnecessary delay” (Barker v. Wingo, 1972).
• “Speedy” is determined on “an ad hoc balancing basis, in which the conduct of the prosecution and that of the defendant are weighed.”
• Speedy Trial Act of 1974 set the time limit at one hundred days for federal cases, with significant wiggle room.
Sixth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Right to a Public Trial and Right to a Notice of Charges
• Originated in traditional Anglo-Saxon mistrust of government secrecy
• Right to a public trial means that defendants can have public attend the trial if they wish.
• The right to notice of charges means that prosecution must tell defendants prior to trial what they are accused of so they can prepare defense.
Sixth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Right to Trial by an Impartial Jury• The jury must be selected from the
community in which the crime occurred
• Among individuals who are not predisposed as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant
Sixth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Assistance of Counsel• At any proceeding deemed to be a
critical stage• Preliminary hearing• Arraignment• Trial• Appeal
• Indigent persons must be provided a lawyer at state’s expense (possible incarceration six months or more).
• Includes the right to effective counsel
Sixth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Seventh Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Provides for right to a trial by jury in federal civil trials
• Applies only to federal trials• Has not been incorporated into Fourteenth
Amendment
Seventh Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Eighth Amendment
MAKING LAW
Excessive Bail• No right to bail• Bail must not be set higher than
necessary to ensure the presence of the defendant at trial (Stack v. Boyle, 1951).
• Persons considered a threat to society can be denied bail (United States v. Salerno, 1987).
Eighth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Cruel and Unusual Punishment• Prohibits torture• Prohibits punishment disproportionate
to the offense• Does not prohibit death penalty
Eighth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Ninth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Codifies the concept of natural law/rights
• Includes such things as the right to privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965)
• Roe v. Wade (1973)• Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
Ninth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Tenth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Been largely ignored by Supreme Court
• States the principle of federalism and constitutionalism
• Federal government has no authority unless granted so by the Constitution.
• Where it has no authority, states and individual citizens retain such authority.
Tenth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Reconstruction Amendments• Passed shortly after Civil War• Intended to protect the recently freed
slaves from abuse• Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth
Amendments• Now used to protect all citizens from
state actions that impinge on constitutional rights
Other Amendments
MAKING LAW
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Thirteenth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Prohibits slavery• Used since to uphold civil rights
legislation• Outlaws “badges of slavery” or
practices intended to keep blacks at lower social and economic levels than whites
Thirteenth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Fourteenth Amendment
MAKING LAW
• Forbids states from mistreating citizens • States cannot deny citizens due process
of law or equal protection.• Three clauses:• Due process clause• Incorporates many of the provisions of the Bill of
Rights, making them applicable to states• Equal protection clause• Bans states from making arbitrary and
unreasonable distinctions between people• Privileges and immunities clause
Fourteenth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
Suspect Classification• Based sans reason or on race or gender• Race and gender are suspect classifications.• Age is not a suspect classification if:• State can demonstrate an interest in the
health and safety of minors• And there is no history of “invidious”
discrimination against minors
Fourteenth Amendment (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Not all rights enjoy equal privilege. • Fundamental rights are “essential to the
concept of ordered liberty” (Palko v. Connecticut, 1937).
• Depending on whether or not a suspect classification or fundamental right is involved, rights are also treated differently.
• Only race and religion are consistently considered suspect classifications (Tribe, 1988).
Standard of Review
MAKING LAW
• Strict scrutiny review • Means that a state may not enact laws that
abridge a fundamental right unless:1. It has a compelling interest in
doing so2. The law is “narrowly tailored” so
that the right is not abridged more than necessary
• Looks at the purpose and effect of the law rather than merely accepting legislative claims of validity
Standard of Review (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Intermediate Scrutiny• Used when laws involve quasi-suspect
classifications• Gender and legitimacy
• Law must be substantially related to an important government purpose.
• Rational basis test• Used when no fundamental right or suspect
classification is in question• It states that laws that affect a right or class
can be passed so long as there is rationale behind doing so.
Standard of Review (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Barron v. Baltimore, 1833, stated that the Bill of Rights applies only to federal government.
• 1868, passage of Fourteenth Amendment to protect recently freed slaves from Southern abuse• Privileges and immunities, due process,
and equal protection clauses protected individuals from state governments.
• Originally applied only to freed slaves
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights (Fourteenth)
MAKING LAW
• During latter half of nineteenth century, courts used incorporation to preclude state economic regulation.
• During the twentieth century, courts began using the Fourteenth Amendment to protect individuals.
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights (Fourteenth) (cont.)
MAKING LAW
• Incorporation refers to the interpretation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in such a way as to prohibit states from abridging certain civil rights.
• Four schools of thought:• Total incorporation• Total incorporation plus• Fundamental rights/ordered liberty• Selective incorporation
Incorporation
MAKING LAW
• Total Incorporation• The entire Bill of Rights is applicable to
state governments.• Not a very popular position• Justice Hugo Black
• Total Incorporation Plus• The entire Bill of Rights and unspecified
rights are all applicable to state governments.
• The Bill of Rights, when examined, creates other individual rights.
• Justice William Douglas
MAKING LAW
• Fundamental Rights/Ordered Liberty• No necessary relationship between due process clause
and Bill of Rights• Due process clause has independent meaning that
prohibits states from violating rights.• Justices must consider “totality of circumstances” to
determine what rights are fundamental. • Justice Felix Frankfurter
• Selective Incorporation• Most prominent in the courts• Combines aspects of total incorporation and fundamental
rights• Favors piecemeal, gradual, and selective incorporation• Led to virtually every right in the Bill of Rights being
incorporated into the due process clause, except the rights to grand jury indictments and protection of excessive bail
• Justice William Brennan
MAKING LAW
• The power of the court to examine a law and determine its constitutionality
• Not specifically mentioned in the Constitution
• It is judge-made law–-the result of Marbury v. Madison (1803).
Judicial Review
MAKING LAW
• Only way to change the Constitution or overrule a Supreme Court decision
• Two ways:• Two thirds of both houses must pass a resolution
calling for an amendment, and then this amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of all states within seven years.
• Two thirds of the states must call for a convention at which an amendment is proposed.
• All twenty-seven amendments have been passed via the first process.
The Process of Amending the Constitution