Interprovincial Crossings Environmental … Crossings Environmental Assessment Study Final Draft -...
-
Upload
nguyendien -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
4
Transcript of Interprovincial Crossings Environmental … Crossings Environmental Assessment Study Final Draft -...
Analysis of Potential Transit Impacts
Final DraftJuly 29, 2008
Interprovincial Crossings Environmental Assessment Study
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1
2.0 EVALUATION OF INTERPROVINCIAL CROSSINGS IN RELATION TO TRANSIT: METHODOLOGY.......................................... 2
2.1 Data ....................................................................................2 2.2 Evaluation Criteria for Transit (CT).....................................5
3.0 TRANSIT PORTRAIT FOR THE STUDY AREA IN 2005 AND FORECAST 2031........................ 6
3.1 The Study Area in 2005......................................................6 3.1.1 Current Transit Conditions (2005) ..........................6 3.1.2 Transit Trips (2005)...............................................12
3.2 The Study Area in “Forecast 2031” ..................................14 3.2.1 Future Transit Conditions (2031) ..........................14 3.2.2 Transit Trips (2031)...............................................15
3.3 Portrait of corridors in 2005 and in “Forecast 2031”.........18
4.0 EVALUATION OF CROSSINGS IN RELATION TO TRANSIT ................................................. 19
4.1 Net Effect of each Corridor on Transit (CT1 and CT2).....19 4.1.1 CT1 – Mean Travel Time per Transit Trip.............19 4.1.2 CT2 – Number of Transit Trips .............................19 4.1.3 Interpretation.........................................................20
4.2 Effect of Transit’s use of the New Interprovincial Corridor (CT3 and CT4) ...........................................................................20
4.2.1 CT3 – Average Transit Travel Time......................21 4.2.2 CT4 – Number of Transit Trips .............................21 4.2.3 Interpretation.........................................................22
5.0 CONCLUSION .......................................... 25
6.0 REFERENCES .......................................... 28
7.0 APPENDICES ........................................... 29
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Appendix 1: Meeting notes, “Transit Team Meeting no. 1” – 25 April 2008, Ottawa
Appendix 2: STO Transit Network (2008, source: www.sto.ca)
Appendix 3: OC Transpo Transit Network (2008, source: www.octranspo.com)
Appendix 4: OC Transpo Rapid Transit (Tran-sitway) and Rural Transit – 2008 – source: www.octranspo.com
Appendix 5: OC Transpo and STO Interprovin-cial Transit Corridors – 2008 – Sources: www.octranspo.com and www.sto.ca
Appendix 6: Model of 2031 Rapid Transit Net-work (source: City of Ottawa)
Appendix 7: Portrait of Corridors for 2005 and Forecast 2031 Scenarios
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
List of Tables Table 1: Transit routes modelled on new
interprovincial crossings (TRANS model, 2008) ..3
Table 2: General characteristics of the STO Gatineau network in 2007-2008 ..........................................6
Table 3: General characteristics of the OC Transpo Ottawa network in 2006 .......................................8
Table 4: Bus routes operated by OC Transpo (source: http://www.octranspo.com, 03/2008) ...................9
Table 5: Transit modal share between the north (Gatineau) and the south (Ottawa) in the study area (National Capital Region), 24h, all motives (source: 2005 Origins Destinations surveys) .....13
Table 6: Variation in transit ridership in the study area, between 2005 and 2031, at morning peak, period TRANS model (2008) ........................................16
Table 7: Variation in transit modal share (versus motorised trips) in the study area, between 2005 and 2031, at morning peak period, TRANS model (2008) ................................................................17
Table 8: Variation in mean travel time per transit trip in the study area, between 2005 and Forecast 2031, at morning peak period, TRANS model (2008)..17
Table 9: Results of evaluation of effects of interprovincial crossings on transit (2008) .........24
1
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
1.0 INTRODUCTION The National Capital Commission (NCC), with the ministère des Transports du Québec (MTQ) and the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) are carrying out the Environ-mental Assessment Study of Future Interprovincial Crossings in the National Capital Re-gion (NCR), in collaboration with the City of Ottawa and the Ville de Gatineau. This study includes a working plan to analyse the effects on public transit resulting from 10 new inter-provincial crossings. This transit evaluation report is structured as follows:
Transit evaluation methodology; Regional portrait of transit for 2005 and 2031; Evaluation of interprovincial crossings in relation to transit; and Conclusions.
The evaluation of public transit is based on the results of modelling using the regional transport model TRANS, which covers the National Capital Region, developed by the TRANS1 committee. This model is based on current (2005) and projected (2031) population and employment statistics, and was developed on the EMME 3 platform. The data have been approved by the Cities of Gatineau and Ottawa and the Ministries of Transportation for Québec and Ontario, under the terms of reference of the TRANS committee. Note that the 2031 model incorporates transport network improvements already planned for that hori-zon. The TRANS model makes it possible to measure the effects of each new crossing on the geographic distribution of transit demand, and the most frequently occurring modal choice, which allows us to evaluate the effect of each link on transit. At the same time, it should be kept in mind that TRANS modelling does not take into consideration the effects created by a new interprovincial crossing on the location of the population or employment; that is, changes in the location of persons or jobs uniquely attributable to the establishment of a new interprovincial crossing cannot be predicted nor modelled.
1 The TRANS committee was created in 1979 to coordinate the efforts of the main transit planning bodies in the National Capital Region. The six members of TRANS represent the three levels of government: the National Capital Commission, the ministère des Transports du Québec, the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario, the Ville de Gatineau, the City of Ottawa and the Société de transport de l’Outaouais.
2
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
2.0 EVALUATION OF INTERPROVINCIAL CROSSINGS IN RELA-TION TO TRANSIT: METHODOLOGY
This section presents the methodological framework used for modelling as well as the available quantitative data selected to evaluate the ten interprovincial crossings in relation to transit, and the evaluation criteria used to accomplish this.
2.1 Data The selected available data for evaluating the effect of interprovincial crossings on transit are outputs of the TRANS regional transport planning model developed by the TRANS Committee, as per its mandate, covering the entire National Capital Region. This regional model was run on an EMME3 platform, to obtain a picture of the geographic distribution of trips and modal split demands over a long-term horizon, according to avail-able transportation alternatives and the location of population and employment, known or planned. This model is particularly used for testing future scenarios using various transpor-tation (infrastructure) alternatives, such as the addition of a new interprovincial highway crossing, as is the case in this present study. The model was recently calibrated by means of supply and demand for the year 2005 using the results of the origin/destination survey and other transportation surveys. For the purpose of this study, the model was used to simulate the following scenarios:
2005: reference year (for calibration); Ten (10) 2005 scenarios, each consisting of the inclusion of a single new inter-
provincial crossing, modelled exclusively as a highway crossing, that is, with no tran-sit route using the crossing (in order to evaluate the maximum automobile load);
“Forecast 2031” or “do nothing”: on the basis of projections relating to location and evolution of population and employment in the study area2, a forecast was modelled for the 2031 situation to include improvements to the highway network and transit networks currently planned (see section 3.2 for further details);
2 Sources: for Gatineau: 2005 population demographics from 2001 census, Institut de la Statistique du Québec and employment fore-casts from the Liste Industries Québec, City of Gatineau; for Ottawa: demographic forecasts based on post-census estimates by the City of Ottawa and employment forecasts based on the 2005 employment survey.
3
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Ten (10) 2031 scenarios, each consisting of the inclusion of a single new inter-provincial crossing, modelled exclusively as a highway crossing, that is, with no tran-sit route using the crossing (in order to evaluate the maximum automobile demand); and
Eight (8) 2031 scenarios, each consisting of the inclusion of a single new inter-provincial crossing AND a transit route (bus without preferential measures, à priori) established over this crossing as defined previously by transit authorities during this study (OC Transpo and Société de Transport de l’Outaouais - STO). These final scenarios are designed to evaluate minimum impacts on reduced ridership of transit networks, and consequently the opportunity of using a new interprovincial crossing for transit. Note: New bus routes on crossing 1 – Pink Road-Riddell and 4-Boulevard des Allumettières-Acres-417/416 were deemed irrelevant by the STO and OC Transpo, either because it was clear that the crossing would not service any employment or associated residential zone (crossing 1), or because it was determined that the route was clearly under-utilized (crossing 4).
These new interprovincial routes are, respectively for each crossing, as follow: Table 1: Transit routes modelled on new interprovincial crossings (TRANS model, 2008)
Scenario Bus routes modelled on interprovincial crossing
Interprovincial Cross-ing 1 – Pink Road-Riddell with bus cross-ing (bridge)
No transit route modelled on this crossing, based on a lack of sufficient zones for service in this specific portion of the NCR.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 2 – Boulevard des Allumetières-Riddell-March-417 with bus crossing (bridge and tunnel)
Rivermead-Eagleson bus route: from Rivermead Parc-o-bus, west on Aylmer Road, west on the new crossing and Riddell, south on March, south on Teron, Teron Station, east on Campeau, south on Eagleson, to Eagleson Station.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 3 – (Lac Deschênes) Boulevard des Allumettières-Moodie-417 with bus crossing (bridge)
Rivermead-Bayshore bus route: from Rivermead Parc-o-bus, west on Aylmer Road, south on the new crossing and Moodie, east on Highway 417 or future Transitway, to Bayshore Station.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 4 – (Lac Desche-nes) Boulevard des Allumettières-Acres-417/416 with bus crossing (bridge)
No transit route modelled for this crossing, based on too little demand in this specific portion of the NCR.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 5 - Kettle Island-50/417 with bus cross-ing (bridge)
Promenades de l'Outaouais-St Laurent bus route: from Promenades de l'Outaouais Terminus, east on Maloney, south on Paiement, new cross-ing and Aviation Parkway, west on Ogilvie, south on St Laurent to St Laurent Station.
4
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Interprovincial Cross-ing 6 - Lower Duck Island-50/417 with bus crossing (bridge)
Lorrain-Blair bus route: from Lorrain (Rapibus) station, south on Lorrain and new crossing, west on Ottawa Road 174 to Blair Station.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 7 - Gatineau Boule-vard de l’Aéroport-174/417 with bus crossing (bridge and tunnel)
Two bus routes: Lorrain-Blair and Masson-Blair:
- Lorrain-Blair: from Lorrain (Rapibus) station, east on Maloney, south on the new crossing, west on Ottawa Road 174, to Blair Station;
- Masson-Blair: from Encan Larose Parc-o-bus, south on Georges, west on Highway 50, south on the new crossing, west on Ottawa Road 174, to Blair Station.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 8 - Montée Mi-neault-Tenth Line-50/417 with bus cross-ing (bridge)
Two bus routes: Lorrain-Place d'Orléans and Masson-Place d'Orléans:
- Lorrain-Place d'Orléans: from Lorrain (Rapibus) station, east on Ma-loney, south on the new crossing and Tenth Line, west on Ottawa Road 174 or new Transitway, to Place d'Orléans Station;
- Masson-Place d'Orléans: from Encan Larose Parc-o-bus, south on Georges, west on Highway 50, south on the new crossing and Tenth Line, west on Ottawa Road 174 or new Transitway, to Place d'Orléans Station.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 9 - Petrie Island-50/417 with bus cross-ing (bridge)
Two bus routes: Lorrain-Trim and Masson-Trim:
- Lorrain-Trim: from Lorrain (Rapibus) station, east on Maloney, south on the new crossing and Trim, to Trim station;
- Masson-Trim: from Encan Larose Parc-o-bus, south on Georges, west on Highway 50, south on the new crossing and Trim, to Trim Station.
Interprovincial Cross-ing 10 – Masson-Angers-Cumberland-50/417 with bus cross-ing (bridge)
Masson-Trim bus route: from Encan Larose Parc-o-bus, south on Georges, west on Highway 50, south on the new crossing and Trim, to Trim Station.
These new bus routes were refined further using the following procedure:
Each of these scenarios was first modelled with high capacities and frequencies (1 bus every minute) for account for maximum demand (without limit) interested in us-ing these new transit routes, to support or fail to support transit inclusion;
After deciding whether or not to keep the bus route on the crossing, based on the demand observed in the first model, a second model was run, with frequencies and capacities reflecting the anticipated demand based on previous analysis.
The evaluation criteria defined to evaluate the effect of interprovincial crossing options on the transit plan are presented in the following section.
5
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
2.2 Evaluation Criteria for Transit (CT) Evaluation of the effect of crossings on transit was performed using selected evaluation cri-teria, discussed at the Transit Workshop meeting, held on April 25, 2008 in Ottawa (Appen-dix 1). These criteria are quantitative measures that came out of the TRANS scenarios’ modelling described above. These criteria measure:
The absolute variation in mean travel time per transit trip, throughout the study area (National Capital Region), at morning peak period, in minutes per trip, between two scenarios (CT1 and CT3 respectively, with and without an interprovincial transit route); This first type of measurement allows the quantification of the effect of the new crossing on the performance or effectiveness of the transit network, or also the level of utility of this new crossing for transit users. This criterion is to be minimized, since reduced travel time is a benefit to the user;
The absolute variation in the number of transit trips taken in the study area (Na-tional Capital Region), during the morning peak period, in number of trips, between two scenarios (CT2 and CT4 respectively, with and without an interprovincial transit route);
This second type of measurement allows us to quantify the effect of the new cross-ing on the use of transit, since what it measures is the variation in number of transit trips throughout the complete study area. This criterion is to be maximized, since an increase in the number of transit trips is a benefit for transit authorities and, more generally, for society.
Note that use of a model such as TRANS provides for a certain degree of reliability for comparative evaluations of scenarios. Within this framework, variations are considered be-tween scenarios which are representative for the analysis, given the level of refinement of transit networks. Two series of measurements were carried out to compare the two scenario sets:
A first series of variations between the scenarios “2031 with highway crossing but without new transit route on the crossing” and the scenario “Forecast 2031”; these variations measure the net effect of the new highway crossing on transit, when the crossing is not used by transit (CT1 and CT2);
A second series of variations between scenarios “2031 with highway crossing and transit service established on that crossing”, and “Forecast 2031”; these variations measure the effect of transit optimisation of the crossing, in other words, it measures the transit opportunity offered by the new crossing (CT3 and CT4).
6
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
3.0 TRANSIT PORTRAIT FOR THE STUDY AREA IN 2005 AND FORECAST 2031
Before presenting the results of the transportation evaluation of the new interprovincial crossings, this section provides a portrait of the transit networks and ridership. This portrait is provided for the complete study area, and for the corridors of each interprovincial cross-ing assessed, for the year 2005 and the “Forecast 2031” produced by the TRANS model, according to the previously described scenarios. These portraits allow for a better understanding of the evaluation of the impacts of the in-terprovincial crossings on transit.
3.1 The Study Area in 2005
3.1.1 Current Transit Conditions (2005) Two urban transit networks exist in the study area: the Société de Transport de l’Outaouais (STO) which serves mainly Gatineau, and OC Transpo which mainly serves Ottawa. These two networks are introduced briefly below. Details on the transit river-crossings provided by OC Transpo and STO will be the focus of section 3.1.1.3.
3.1.1.1 The STO Network The STO offers transit service across the area of the Ville de Gatineau, Cantley and Chel-sea. Some STO routes also serve downtown Ottawa. The following table offers some gen-eral characteristics of the STO. Table 2: General characteristics of the STO Gatineau network in 2007-2008
(source: http://www.sto.ca )
Variable Value (2007) Area covered by service 589 km² Population served Over 240,000 residents Bus trips Over 18 million Annual variation in ridership + 3.6% (2007/2006) Number of vehicles 259 buses Number of valid smart cards in circulation Over 28,000 Number of bus routes offered In 2008: 57 routes (consisting of: 41 regular
and peak routes, 13 express routes, 2 inter-zone routes and the 300 route)
7
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
3.1.1.1.1 Service
STO service consists of four types of bus service: Regular: regular service at regular intervals; Peak period: service offered on weekdays mornings and evenings, in the direction of
peak flows; Express: service offered only during morning and evening peak periods, consisting
of embarking, sealing of doors, disembarking; designed in this way to offer faster service than regular service; and
Interzone: service using the highway between the Masson-Angers sector and the Hull and Ottawa downtowns;
The complete STO network map is given in Appendix 2.
3.1.1.1.2 Reserved Lanes
The STO network includes about 20 kilometres of reserved lanes. These reserved lanes are located on the following roadways:
Maisonneuve Boulevard; Alexandre-Taché Boulevard; Portage Bridge; Gréber Boulevard; Fournier Boulevard; and Aylmer Road.
The location of these reserved lanes is mapped on the STO Internet site (www.sto.ca).
3.1.1.1.3 Parc-o-bus
The STO offers 17 Parc-o-bus lots served by transit, which allow riders to park their vehi-cles and continue their trips by transit. These Parc-o-bus lots are located at:
Rivermead; Galeries Aylmer; Centre Robert-Guertin; Les Promenades; De la Cité (temporary); Freeman; Pierre-Lafontaine; St-Alexandre;
Jean-René-Monette; Sainte-Rose-de-Lima; Lorrain; Georges/Highway 148; De l’Encan; Old Chelsea; Gréber/Saint-Louis; Saint-Dominique; and
8
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Hippodrome. Some of these Parc-o-bus lots are free, while others impose parking fees. The locations of these Parc-o-bus lots are mapped on the STO Internet site (www.sto.ca).
3.1.1.1.4 Rates
Three types of rates apply to STO services: regular, express and interzone rates, depend-ing on the type of service used. The methods of payment available are:
Cash payment; Ticket; Transfer; Day pass; Monthly pass in the format of the Passe-Partout PLUS smart card; Loyalty program: annual pass by automatic bank payment; The Cam-Puce rate, for adults 21 years of age and older registered in a full-time
program of study; and Gift card.
The Passe-Partout PLUS smart card is used on a subscriber basis, but can also be used as an identification card to allow the use of a reduced rate ticket, since it is personalized. It can be reloaded at one of many agents’ sites. Reduced rates are offered to the elderly, children, students, groups, persons with impaired vision, and those with invisible handicaps. Rate integration with OC Transpo allows riders to travel on the STO network with a valid OC Transpo proof of payment, subject to specific conditions depending upon the type of service being used.
3.1.1.2 The OC-Transpo Network OC Transpo offers transit service to the communities of Ottawa, Nepean, Vanier, Rock-cliffe, Gloucester, Kanata, and Orléans, and offers a rural transit service (established in 2002) to the communities of Cumberland Village, Carlsbad Springs, South Gloucester, Kars, Leitrim, Manotick, Munster Hamlet, Navan, North Gower, Notre-Dame-des-Champs, Richmond, Stittsville, and Vars. Certain OC Transpo routes also serve downtown Gatineau. The following table offers some general characteristics of the OC Transpo service as it ex-ists in the year 2006. Table 3: General characteristics of the OC Transpo Ottawa network in 2006
(source: http://www.octranspo.com )
9
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Variable Value for year 2006 Area covered by service 413 km² Population served 760,100 individuals Total number of bus trips 91.8 million Average number of trips per weekday 355,100 Total number of passenger-kilometres 835.7 million Number of bus routes offered (excluding routes operated by rural partners)
238
Number of rail routes offered 1 (O-Train)
3.1.1.2.1 Service
OC Transpo service is structured over two broad service types, which themselves consist of various types of transit routes:
Downtown routes: consisting of various types of bus routes and the O-Train rail line; and
Routes serving rural areas, comprising the rural transit service offered by OC Transpo.
The OC Transpo Rapid Transit network extends both into downtown and peripheral rural areas. The following table brings together the bus routes operated by OC Transpo. The O-Train provides yet another route. Table 4: Bus routes operated by OC Transpo (source: http://www.octranspo.com, 03/2008)
Type of bus route Number of routes Routes serving downtown: Rapid Transit Routes 5 Black Routes 61 Red Routes 33 School Routes 88 Early Morning Routes 6 Scotiabank Place Connexion Routes (occasional)
6
SUB-TOTAL 199 Routes serving rural areas: Green Express Routes (including 8 Rural Ex-press Routes)
39
SUB-TOTAL 39 TOTAL 238
10
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
The complete OC Transpo network map is given in Appendix 3. OC Transpo’s rapid transit and rural networks are given in Appendix 4. O-Train The O-Train uses a railway line 8 kilometres in length between the Greenboro Station to the south and Bayview Station to the north, and operates to the west of downtown in the City of Ottawa. Five stations receive service, each connected to express and/or regular bus routes, and in particular, the O-Train offers connections at downtown, Carleton University and the Ottawa International Airport (south of Greenboro station). The O-Train runs Monday through Saturday, with a frequency of between 15 and 30 min-utes. It is based on Bombardier Talent equipment furnished with diesel engines at each end, allowing it to travel in either direction without the need for a half-turn. The O-Train has room for 135 seated passengers, with additional standing room for 150 persons. It was launched on October 15, 2001. Rapid Transit Routes: 5 (five) express bus routes comprise the Rapid Transit Routes: routes 94, 95, 96, 97, 101/102, with higher frequencies. The routes taken are listed in Appendix 4. Regular routes In parallel to the rapid transit service offered by OC Transpo (5 bus routes and one train route) there are:
61 Black / Regular bus routes: operate 7 days a week, all day; 33 Red / Peak routes: operate from Monday to Friday, peak hours only; 88 School Routes; 6 Early Morning routes: operate between 4 a.m. and 6 a.m.; and 6 Scotiabank Place Connection Routes which operate as necessary, depending
upon the duration and scope of the event taking place at Scotiabank Place (occa-sional service).
Rural routes The rural areas of Ottawa receive the following transit services (Appendix 4):
OC Transpo, with 39 Green Express Routes: operate Monday to Friday at peak hours, serving suburban areas and require a supplementary payment; 8 Rural Ex-press Routes are included in this category; and
Several other bus fleet operators offering 17 Rural Partner Routes: operate at a variable rate (variable per operator) and only during peak hours.
3.1.1.2.2 Reserved Lanes – the Transitway
Transit running on dedicated routes in Ottawa includes the O-Train, introduced above, and Transitway routes. The Transitway is a network comprised of several trunks running through a dedicated corri-dor for buses (portions of the roadway exclusively reserved for buses), serving downtown
11
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Ottawa. The Transitway makes it possible to offer express, high speed, high frequency bus routes (the 5 Rapid Transit Routes). In downtown, 175 buses run on the principal trunks of the Transitway during the peak period. This network, largely completed in 1996 and 31 kilometres in length, connects 38 stops. In addition, 31 bike & ride lock-ups are offered (two-wheel lock-ups, to encourage the combined use of bicycles and transit).
3.1.1.2.3 Park&Ride
Park&Ride in Downtown The OC Transpo network in downtown has 11 Park&Ride lots representing 5100 private vehicle parking spaces. Gold permits allow riders to reserve a spot on a yearly basis at one of these lots. Park&Ride in rural areas The OC Transpo network in rural areas also has 14 Park&Ride lots representing approxi-mately 1,225 spaces for private vehicles. Here, Gold permits also allow riders to reserve a spot on a yearly basis.
3.1.1.2.4 Rates
Three types of rates apply to OC Transpo services: regular, express, or rural circuit, de-pending on the type of service being used. The possible mehtods of payment are:
Cash payment; Orange tickets, that may be purchased at designated sales points; The O-Train ticket, which applies solely to use of the O-Train; and Monthly passes, the least expensive option when the number of monthly trips so jus-
tifies. In addition, there are:
Different types of monthly passes, depending on the age of the user, the type of cir-cuit being used, whether or not one is a student, or handicapped, etc.;
The DAYPASS, a transit pass for the full day; ECOPASS, a salary holdback program for employees; and GOLD PERMITS to allow one to reserve a place at Park&Ride station.
Rate integration with OC Transpo allows one to travel on the STO network using a valid OC Transpo pass, provided that certain conditions are met, and depending upon the type of service used.
3.1.1.3 River-Crossing Transit Connections River-crossing transit connections in the study area are offered by ferries on the Ottawa River and by OC Transpo and STO bus routes.
3.1.1.3.1 OC Transpo Interprovincial Transit
6 (six) OC Transpo bus routes offer river-crossing connections (see Appendix 5):
12
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
4 Red routes (at peak: 40, 88, 105, 180); 1 Black route (regular, 8); and 1 Green route (suburban route, 27).
3.1.1.3.2 STO Interprovincial Transit
STO bus routes offering a river-crossing connection are (see Appendix 5): Over the Champlain bridge: 2 peak routes, namely the 58 Rivermead and Aylmer
Road –Tunneys Pasture (Transitway) and the 28 Gamelin-Émond –Tunneys Pasture (Transitway), offering essentially a southbound route during morning peak period and northbound during afternoon peak period;
Over the Portage, Alexandre and Macdonald-Cartier bridges: o 11 regular routes (21, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 59, 67, 77); o 14 peak routes (1, 5, 20, 25, 26, 27, 29, 40, 41, 44, 46, 45, 47, 48); o 15 express and interzone routes (11, 17, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88,
89, 90, 94, 98).
3.1.2 Transit Trips (2005) The 2005 origin-destination survey conducted in the study area was interpreted and dis-cussed in the report “2005 Origin-Destination Survey - Summary of Results, National Capi-tal Region”, (TRANS Committee, iTRANS consulting, December 2006). The main observa-tions in 2005 relating to travel were the following:
A high vehicle ownership rate per household, at 1.41; An increase in the number of households and jobs, as compared to 20 years earlier; An increase in the number of total trips in the study area , as compared to 20 years
earlier, achieving a level of 2.81 million trips per day in 2005; The transit trips accounted for 13% of all trips (all modes) over a period of 24 hours
and for 19% and 16% respectively for all trips during peak periods in the morning and the afternoon;
The number transit trips in the study area has increased since 1986, however, the transit modal share has decreased over the same period (dropping from 15.4% to 12.9%);
The transit modal share relative to all motorized travel modes combined is 24% for trips originating from the study area and 19% for trips with a destination in the study area (at the two peak periods of the day);
Combining all travel modes, downtown Ottawa is the main destination of all trips (23%) at morning peak period; and
The greatest interprovincial flows are generated by residents of the Outaouais get-ting to Ottawa during the morning peak period (43,200 compared to 17,200 heading in the opposite direction) and returning during the afternoon peak period.
13
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
A more specific analysis of the data from the 2005 origin-destination survey made it possi-ble to determine the transit modal share of interprovincial trips in the study area (National Capital Region) (Table 5). Table 5: Transit modal share between the north (Gatineau) and the south (Ottawa) in the study area (National Capital Region), 24h, all motives (source: 2005 Origins Destinations surveys)
North South
North 7% 19%
South 16% 14%
The transit modal share is (24 hour period, all motives, based on all travel modes, 2005): river-crossings, both directions combined: 18%; river-crossings towards the South higher than towards the North, by 3%.
Given that the total number of trips towards the South is higher in absolute value than those towards the North, these figures confirm that Ottawa attracts more trips than Gatineau/Hull and moreover, that transit is more frequently used in the direction of Ottawa than in the di-rection of Gatineau/Hull. At the same time, when the modal shares are examined more closely, distinguishing be-tween downtowns, urban peripheries and the rural areas of both sides of the Ottawa River, it becomes apparent (for trips over 24 hours, all motives, 2005) that the highest transit mo-dal shares are observed in the following river-crossing origin-destination pairs:
Trips between downtown Ottawa and the urban periphery of Gatineau (Plateau, Aylmer, Pointe Gatineau and Gatineau East sectors), with a transit modal share of 34% towards downtown Ottawa and 29% towards the urban periphery of Gatineau;
Trips between the two downtowns are roughly equal (27% and 28%); Trips between downtown Gatineau (île de Hull and Hull periphery) and the urban pe-
riphery of Ottawa (Bayshore/Cedarview, Ottawa West, Merivale, Hunt Club, Alta Vista, Orléans, Beacon Hill, Ottawa East sectors), with a transit modal share of 23% towards downtown Gatineau and 24% towards the urban periphery of Ottawa.
14
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
3.2 The Study Area in “Forecast 2031” The study area (National Capital Region) was characterized within the TRANS model in terms of population, employment, and travel by motorized means. Population and employ-ment projections for 2031 came from several sources and are validated projections3. The information below regarding transit and projected demand comes from the TRANS model.
3.2.1 Future Transit Conditions (2031) The transit network modelled in the TRANS model to simulate the “Forecast 2031” is an improved network compared to 2005. The main improvements are listed below. Ottawa - OC Transpo The improvements made to transit in the southern portion of the National Capital Region include all of the measures mentioned in the “Transportation Master Plan Ottawa 2020” (TMP), prepared by and for the City of Ottawa in 2003, currently being studied and updated for a new 2008 version. Briefly, this plan proposes six types of strategic actions for transit, taken into consideration in the TRANS model, which are:
Measures favouring transit accompanying urban development (parking manage-ment, transportation demand management, financial incentive initiatives, intermodal integration and the establishment of infrastructure priorities);
Strategic initiatives in the transit service (network structure, service standards, rates, financing, service to villages and rural regions, interprovincial service and service from outside the City of Ottawa);
Improvements to accessibility and specialized services for reduced mobility individu-als;
Transit priority measures on major arterial roads; Extension of the Rapid Transit Network, especially of the Transitway and the Light
Rail System, accompanied by new stations and new Park&Rides; and Expansion of the vehicle fleet and replacement of vehicles, integrating greener tech-
nologies to reduce polluting atmospheric emissions. It should be noted that in terms of expansion to the Rapid Transit Network, the scope of the network modelled at the time the TRANS modelling was performed (January 2008) was only a little less than what is proposed in the TMP. Improvements taken into consideration in the context of this study are the following (Appendix 6):
3 Sources: for Gatineau: 2005 population demographics from 2001 census, Institut de la Statistique du Québec and employment fore-casts from the Liste Industries Québec, Ville de Gatineau; for Ottawa: demographic forecasts based on post-census estimates by the City of Ottawa and employment forecasts based on the 2005 employment survey.
15
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Conversion of the Transitway into a Light Rail System (LRT) between Baseline and Blair (red routes in Appendix 6);
Extension of the O-Train (LRT) to the south (red routes in Appendix 6); Extension of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in rural areas (blue routes in Appendix 6);
and A few supplementary routes in BRT service from amongst the axes designated in
grey in Appendix 6, currently being studied (2008). Other minor improvements to the transit network in Ottawa have been completed, such as adding short local bus routes to service new rapidly growing zones. Gatineau – STO With regards to the STO transit system, the project designed to provide the backbone of the structure of the regional light rapid transport, the Rapibus, was modelled for the 2031 situa-tion (see Appendix 6). The Rapibus project represents the intervention 3.1 of the strategic axis III (a high performance transit network supported by appropriate infrastructure) of the STO strategic plan of 2005-2015. The Rapibus consists of developing a dedicated site in a railway right-of-way in the east-west axis, connecting Gatineau to Hull (downtown), which would nearly double the number of reserved lane kilometres available to transit in Gatineau. An express route (BRT – Bus Rapid Transit) would be dedicated to the Rapibus, and the local routes would provide direct connections to it (draw-downs). According to the TRANS 2031 scenarios modelled in this study, the Rapibus runs from Laurier to Montcalm, integrat-ing a BRT connection to north of Hull.
3.2.2 Transit Trips (2031) Transit travel data for the “Forecast 2031”situation are the result of TRANS modelling. A few results are presented in this section, characterizing the transit demand in the “Forecast 2031” situation and its comparison with respect to the 2005 situation modelled. The figures given pertain solely to morning peak period.
Vehicle kilometres in cars increase by 32.5% between 2005 and 2031, while vehicle kilometres in transit increase by 530.4%;
Transit ridership in the morning peak period (Table 6): o Transit ridership increases strongly between 2005 and 2031 over the whole
study area: + 75.1%; o Increased ridership is greatest on the desire line of the Ottawa River, espe-
cially in the direction of Gatineau (+203%), the result of the development of the planned employment centres on that side of the river;
o Downtown Gatineau sees the number of transit trips in its direction increase (+191.7%) in a more pronounced manner with respect to those towards
16
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
downtown Ottawa (+33.8%), although the latter was originally higher (15,442 trips to downtown Ottawa compared to 2,339 trips to downtown Gatineau in 2005);
Transit modal shares during the morning peak period (modal shares of all trips by motorized means, Table 7):
o The transit modal share over the entire study area (National Capital Region) increased by 5.6 percent between 2005 and 2031, to reach 25.6%;
o Note that the transit modal share in the direction of downtown Ottawa is 54% in 2005 and reaches 65% in 2031, while this modal share in the direction of downtown Gatineau (île de Hull) goes from 27% to 43% in 2031.
Table 6: Variation in transit ridership in the study area, between 2005 and 2031, during morning peak, period TRANS model (2008)
Forecast 2031 2005
Variation relative to 2005 Transit ridership (trips) for ori-gin/destination pairs
Absolute value
Absolute value Absolute variation
Variation in %
Study area (NCR – National Capital Re-gion)
47,793 83,684 35,891 75.1%
Ottawa River screenline:
• Ottawa to Gatineau (northbound)
1,868 5,660 3,792 203.0%
• Gatineau to Ottawa (southbound)
5,106 11,903 6,797 133.1%
»Urban centres screenline:
• Incoming to urban centre of Gatineau (île de Hull)
2,339 6,823 4,484 191.7%
• Incoming to urban centre of Ot-tawa
15,442 20,664 5,222 33.8%
• Incoming to both urban centres of Ottawa and Gatineau
17,781 27,487 9,706 54.6%
17
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Table 7: Variation in transit modal share (versus motorized trips) in the study area, between 2005 and 2031, during morning peak period, TRANS model (2008)
Transit modal share for the entire study area (NCR—National Capital Region)
2005 Forecast 2031
Value (%) 20.0% 25.6%
Variation relative to Fore-cast 2031 (point)
5.6
The number of transit trips over the entire study area presented in Table 6 for 2005 and Forecast 2031 are values that contribute to the CT2 evaluation criterion for these two years. The values of the CT1 criterion, namely, the mean travel time per transit trip, are presented below for those two years. The travel time varies by 2.32% and shows an improvement in 2031, as the level of service of the transit network in 2031 is better than that in 2005. Table 8: Variation in mean travel time per transit trip in the study area, between 2005 and Fore-cast 2031, during morning peak period, TRANS model (2008)
2005 Forecast 2031 (relative to 2005)
Absolute value (minutes/trip)
29.57 28.88
Absolute variation (minutes/trip)
-0.69
Relative value (%) -2.32%
18
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
3.3 Portrait of corridors in 2005 and in “Forecast 2031” Before presenting the evaluation of the interprovincial crossings in relation to transit, the zones surrounding those new crossings were characterized according to three parameters:
Total population within a 1 kilometre buffer zone around the proposed crossing (pro-file);
Total employment within a 1 kilometre buffer zone around the proposed crossing (profile); and
Number of currently existing transit routes (2008) within 2 kilometre buffer zone around the proposed crossing (profile).
The population and job buffer areas around the proposed crossings (profiles) allow us to develop a general idea of the potential demand generated (population) and attracted (em-ployment) in the neighbourhood of those crossings. This provides a notion of potential de-mand that may be attracted by a possible transit crossing on a proposed new highway crossing. These three parameters, provided for information only, allow overall characterization of the zones in direct contact with the proposed new crossings. In addition, these parameters help to define the new bus routes on the proposed new crossings (scenarios modelled using the TRANS model). Appendix 7 presents these three parameters on the OC Transpo and STO transit network maps, upon which the outlines of the interprovincial crossings have been drawn.
19
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
4.0 EVALUATION OF CROSSINGS IN RELATION TO TRANSIT The evaluation of the impact of each new interprovincial crossing on transit was conducted for this study using the four evaluation criteria CT1, CT2, CT3 and CT4 defined in section 2.2. Table 9 presents the results of the transit evaluation. It must be noted that Corridors 2 and 7 are presented as two options, tunnel and bridge, which at this stage of development and for the purposes of this study cannot be differentiated, since the precise terms of these two options have not yet been defined. These results are discussed below, breaking them down into two groups of effects:
The effects of each interprovincial crossing on transit, without any transit on the crossings (CT1 and CT2); and
The effects of the use of each interprovincial crossing by a transit route (CT3 and CT4).
4.1 Net Effect of each Corridor on Transit (CT1 and CT2) The observations on evaluation criteria CT1 and CT2 are accompanied by observations of other measures stemming from the TRANS model, so that interpretations can be made.
4.1.1 CT1 – Mean Travel Time per Transit Trip Observations:
The low variations in mean transit travel time over the study area are explained by the fact that these are variations in means over an entire study area. The conclu-sions issuing from the analysis of these values must be considered while keeping in mind that the variations are low;
All of the options modelled for a new interprovincial crossing lead to reduced mean transit travel time over the study area; establishing a new interprovincial highway crossing leads to improved transit travel time across the region, but in a very moder-ated fashion (gain of 0.21 to 0.54 minutes per trip); and
The “high performance” crossings, that is, those leading to the greatest reductions in mean transit travel time are Crossings 8, 5, 7, 9 and 6, while those with the least ef-fect are crossings 2, 1 and 10.
4.1.2 CT2 – Number of Transit Trips Observations:
20
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
All of the options modelled for a new interprovincial crossing lead to reduced num-bers of transit trips; the establishment of a new interprovincial highway crossing leads to reduced transit ridership in the region (losses ranging from 740 to 2,271 trips per morning peak period);
Crossings that result in the greatest reduction in transit ridership are Crossings 6, 7, 5, 9, 8, 4 and 3, in decreasing order of that effect. The crossings furthest from down-town and to the west have less negative effect on transit ridership and are therefore the more interesting options, as they reduce ridership only very slightly.
4.1.3 Interpretation The reduced route travel time is accompanied by reduced transit ridership and:
o In the case of Crossings 1 to 5 and 10, a slight increase in the commercial speed of transit: possibly due to a slight decrease in average distances trav-elled by transit;
o In the case of Crossings 6 and 7, a slight reduction in the commercial speed of transit: due to a reduction of transit travel distances;
o A reduction in the transit modal share, calculated on the basis of total motor-ized trips (transit and car) in the study area, and a slight increase in the num-ber of trips made by car; therefore, there has been a slight modal transfer from transit in favour of the car, which is explained by the fact that the car de-rives greater benefit from the establishment of a new interprovincial highway crossing.
The reduced route travel times are explained by reduced transit ridership on the longest trips, which are now replaced with shorter trips, more accessible to cars by the new river-crossing highway. Moreover, the likelihood of “diverting” certain traffic lanes, and the downtown traffic in terms of number of vehicles (cars, trucks) follow-ing the establishment of a new interprovincial highway crossing, would improve traf-fic conditions in those zones and therefore improve route travel times for transit in those corridors;
The crossings that would have the greatest effects on route travel time and transit ridership are those located closest to urbanized zones, dense with transit demand, that is, the east and downtown of the study area. The west and exocentric crossings are further away from these zones of dense population, employment and transit routes, explaining the lesser effects.
4.2 Effect of Transit’s use of the New Interprovincial Corridor (CT3 and CT4)
Recall that criteria CT3 and CT4 measure the value of travel time and transit ridership for 2031 scenarios with the new crossing AND with a bus route on that crossing (subject to
21
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
traffic conditions), compared with the scenario “Forecast 2031”. There are no values for corridors 1 and 4 since no bus route was modelled on these crossings, which had previ-ously been determined to be irrelevant (see section 2.1). It must be noted that the values for criteria CT3 and CT4 are not very different than those for criteria CT1 and CT2, as follow:
The integration of a new interprovincial crossing in the transit network of the region (by establishment of a bus route with no additional measures, on that crossing) has little effect on ridership losses and average transit travel time in the region, when considering the situation where the new interprovincial crossing exists but is not in-tegrated into the transit network;
These two criteria offer little additional opportunity for discrimination between criteria CT1 and CT2.
The observations and interpretations below are made by comparing the values of criteria CT1 and CT2, in order to evaluate the benefits or losses resulting from the use of the inter-provincial crossing by a transit route.
4.2.1 CT3 – Average Transit Travel Time Observations:
The addition of a bus route on an interprovincial crossing reduces very slightly and in a relatively insignificant manner, the average transit travel time over the study area, for most corridors (2 and 6 to 10), in relation to the same situations with interprovin-cial crossings without bus routes on the crossings; time gains of 0.23 to 0.64 minutes per trip, compared to time gains of 0.21 to 0.54 minutes per trip when crossings are not used by transit;
Crossings 3 (Allumettières Blvd-Moodie) and 5 (Kettle Island) are the crossings where there is a slight increase in average transit travel time for the study area, in re-lation to the 2031 situation with a crossing but without bus routes on the crossing; +0.03 and +0.05 minutes per trip, respectively, which is still only a low variation and relatively insignificant when considering the TRANS model;
The highest performance crossings according to this criterion are Crossings 6 and 7, although it should be noted that the values of this criteria are little different from the values of criterion CT1; the use of a crossing by a new transit route changes little about average transit travel time over the study area.
4.2.2 CT4 – Number of Transit Trips Observations:
The addition of a bus route on an interprovincial crossing very slightly and very in-significantly increases or decreases transit ridership over the study area, for all
22
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
crossings, in relation to the same situations with interprovincial crossings without bus routes; ridership losses to transit are in the order of 740 to 2,285 trips during morning peak period, while they are in the order of 740 to 2,271 when the crossings are not used by transit;
Note: For information, maximum annual ridership loss (2,285 per peak period – 2 peak periods per day – 5 days per week and 48 weeks per year) is approximately 1,100,100 trips. This value corresponds respectively to 6.1% of total annual STO ridership (2007) or to 1.2% of total annual OC Transpo ridership (2006). Consider too that this interprovincial transit ridership loss would bear more heavily upon the routes serviced by the STO, even though it concerns both the STO and OC Transpo. Most interprovincial transit trips are provided by the STO, who offer more transit routes across the river. Furthermore, to the STO this ridership loss would correspond to about 20% of the anticipated ridership of 11,200 passengers during the peak pe-riod in 2011 in the Rapibus corridor4.
The eastern crossings (7 to 10) induce lower ridership losses when these crossings are used by new transit routes (compared to situations where they are not used), while the crossings at the centre and in the west induce slightly higher ridership losses; and
The best performing crossings (resulting in the least transit ridership loss over the study area) are Crossings 1, 2 and 10; that is, crossings situated the greatest dis-tance from the centre of the study area.
4.2.3 Interpretation The mere act of integrating the new interprovincial crossing in the transit network of
the study area, i.e. adding a bus route on the crossing (without associated preferen-tial measures) has very little impact on transit ridership loss during the morning peak period. The crossing does however offer the benefit of a modest reduction in aver-age transit travel time over the study area, probably associated with that loss of rid-ership and the shorter travel path.
Improvements to route travel time remain very low, or may become slight reductions, especially for congested crossings (the most central ones, crossings 3, 4 and 5 in the southbound direction in particular), since the buses on the new transit route will also be subject to peak traffic conditions (no reserved bus lane was modelled over these crossings). It should be recalled however that the differences observed be-
4 Source: Rapibus – detailed feasibility study – final report, February 2004. The Rapibus would result in an increased ridership of nearly 14% over 24 hours between 2002 and 2011. For this purpose, the ridership of the Rapibus was calculated as representing 14% of annual 2002 ridership.
23
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
tween criteria CT1-CT2 and CT3-CT4 are minor, and any conclusions drawn from these comparisons should be interpreted very conservatively.
The crossings with the greatest effects on route travel time and transit ridership are those located closest to urbanized zones showing a high transit demand, that is, the east and centre of the study area. The west crossings and the most exocentric zones are further from these zones of dense population, employment and transit routes, explaining the low effects produced. In summary, independent of whichever new crossing is under consideration, establishment of transit routes on the new interprovincial crossing has marginal or no effect on ridership losses from this service or to the benefit of car traffic. It is even more evident that when no prioritization of that transit route is made (reserved lane, traffic light priorities, etc.), transit has difficulty competing with car travel. This is most readily verified by examining the results for crossings near the central zones (urbanized and dense in transit routes), with the great-est ridership.
24
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Table 9: Results of evaluation of effects of interprovincial crossings on transit (2008)
Note: The results shown above were developed using the transportation model of the TRANS Committee, May 26, 2008.
25
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
5.0 CONCLUSION This section provides a summary of the interpretations resulting from the evaluation of the impact of interprovincial crossings on transit, presenting the highlights first, and finally offer-ing recommendations stemming from this analysis. These conclusions are made on the basis of the results of TRANS modelling involving the entire study area - specifically, the National Capital Region, for a weekday morning peak period. Effects on Transit of new Interprovincial crossing without establishment of new tran-sit line on that crossing: (Loss of ridership for transit)
The establishment of a new interprovincial crossing has the effect of significantly re-
ducing the use of transit, with a gain in car use; The establishment of a new interprovincial crossing has the effect of reducing route
travel time, with those trips that were originally long by transit being those preferen-tially replaced by new car trips, as being more direct;
The establishment of a new interprovincial crossing has the effect of reducing (im-
proving) route travel time for transit; this travel, the longest in the absence of a new interprovincial crossing, becomes shorter with the new crossing;
The negative impacts resulting from a new interprovincial crossing, from the point of
view of transit ridership (reduced with gains in use of cars) are more serious for those crossings located near central zones of the region and the areas that are best served by transit (centre and east of the zone);
The maximum ridership loss anticipated for 2031 corresponds to about 6% of STO
ridership during the morning peak period, and 20% of ridership forecast for the Rapibus project of 2011.
26
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
The interprovincial crossing having the least negative effect on transit (route travel time and ridership combined) is Crossing 8 Montée Mineault-10th Line-50/417, when no transit route is established on the crossing. The crossing with the greatest negative effects on transit (route travel time and ridership combined) is Crossing 6 Lower Duck Island-50/417, when no transit route is established on the crossing. Effects of the establishment of a transit route on the new interprovincial crossing: (Possibility of new crossing for transit) Note: transit routes on new interprovincial crossings are modelled without reserved lanes for transit vehicles. Accordingly, these vehicles are subject to traffic conditions.
The establishment of a transit route on a new interprovincial crossing does little to change or reduce (or improve) the transit route travel time, when compared to the situation with a new interprovincial crossing without a transit route;
Possible improvements to route travel time and ridership, that would be offered by a
transit route on a new interprovincial crossing, are not judged to be sufficiently sig-nificant to discriminate between interprovincial crossings on this basis;
Transit use of a new interprovincial crossing slightly reduces the negative effects of
the establishment of the new crossing on transit, but statistical significance is not high. However, in the absence of transit priority measures on the new crossing (re-served lanes, traffic light priority, etc.), this use would not be effective. This is more evident in the case of crossings near central zones (urbanized and dense with transit routes).
The most useful interprovincial crossing for transit is Crossing 10 (Masson-Angers-Cumberland) (positive benefits for route travel time and ridership criteria). The least useful interprovincial crossing for transit is Crossing 5 Kettle Island -50/417 (no benefits for route travel time and ridership criteria). Finally, recall that the establishment of a transit route on Crossings 1 and 4 has been deemed irrelevant.
27
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
Summary:
The establishment of a new interprovincial crossing has the effect of significantly re-ducing the use of transit, with gains in use of the car. This effect is strongest for cen-tral crossings (5, 6 and 7, that is, Kettle, Lower Duck and East Lower Duck), since these crossings are surrounded by more densely developed areas, better served by transit.
This negative effect can be only very slightly mitigated by allowing use of that cross-
ing by bus transit, without accompanying priority measures on or around that cross-ing. These preliminary results indicate the need to proceed with an in-depth analysis of the recommended interprovincial crossings, independently of the corridor in ques-tion, in Phase 2 of the impact study, to consider:
o Increased integration of routes using the new crossing with the same configu-
ration as existing STO and OC Transpo networks, in order to better mitigate before ridership losses;
o New optimization measures to accompany the river-crossing service: re-served bus lanes, transit crossing priorities near crossings, other types of transit services, etc., to better mitigate well the ridership losses experienced;
o Evaluate “local” effects of the new transit crossing more closely, in particular, the effects on users of the new routes in comparison with their travel path-ways when no transit route uses that crossing;
Given the minor distinctions between criteria CT3 and CT4 relative to criteria CT1
and CT2, it may be possible to limit the transit evaluation to criteria CT3 and CT4 since these take into consideration the presence of a transit service.
According to representative criteria CT3 and CT4, Crossing 10 Masson-Angers-
Cumberland-50/417 results in the least negative effects on transit and Crossing 5, Kettle Island-50/417 results in the most negative effects.
28
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
6.0 REFERENCES Publications and studies:
City of Ottawa, “Transportation Master Plan for the City of Ottawa”, as adopted by the Ottawa City Council, September 2003, 125p., available on: http://www.ottawa.ca/city_services/planningzoning/2020/transpo/7_fr.shtml
iTRANS consulting for the TRANS Committee, “Enquête Origine-Destination 2005, Sommaire des résultats, National Capital Region”, December 2006. http://www.ottawa.ca/city_services/planningzoning/2020/transpo/pdf/tmp_en.pdf
McCormick Rankin Corporation (MRC) in association with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Tot-ten Sims Hubicki and Tecsult for the TRANS Committee, “TRANS model Redevel-opment, Technical Report, Draft version”, March 26th 2008, 147p.
Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO Eastern Ontario Regional Office), “Stra-tegic Transportation Directions, Draft, Eastern Ontario”, January 2002, 19p.
Ministère des Transports du Québec, Direction générale de l’Ouest, Direction de l’Outaouais, “Plan de transport de l’Outaouais 1996-2011”, September 1996, 140p.
Roche-Deluc and Tecsult for the Société de Transport de l’Outaouais (STO), “Rapi-bus, un système rapide de transport en commun pour l’Outaouais, Étude de faisabilité détaillée – Rapport final”, 2004, 42p.
Société de Transport de l’Outaouais (STO), “Plan stratégique 2005-2015”, October 2005, 63p.
Internet Sites: Executive Gatineau-Ottawa Airport: http://www.ego-aeroport.ca/ Ottawa International Airport: http://www.ottawa-airport.ca/ OC Transpo: http://www.octranspo.com STO: www.sto.ca
29
T R A N S I T R E P O R T
Final Draft - 29/07/2008
7.0 APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Meeting notes, “Transit Team Meeting no. 1” – 25 April 2008, Ottawa Appendix 2: STO Transit Network (2008, source: www.sto.ca) Appendix 3: OC Transpo Transit Network (2008, source: www.octranspo.com) Appendix 4: OC Transpo Rapid Transit (Transitway) and Rural Transit – 2008 –
source: www.octranspo.com Appendix 5: OC Transpo and STO Interprovincial Transit Corridors – 2008 –
Sources: www.octranspo.com and www.sto.ca Appendix 6: Model of 2031 Rapid Transit Network (source: City of Ottawa) Appendix 7: Portrait of Corridors for 2005 and Forecast 2031 Scenarios
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final raft 07/29/2008
APPENDIX 1: NOTES OF “TRANSIT TEAM MEETING NO 1” – APRIL 25TH 2008, OTTAWA
Page
2 Item
A
ssig
ned
1.0
Pres
enta
tion
of th
e ov
eral
l eva
luat
ion
met
hodo
logy
for
crite
ria
R
oche
-NC
E
By
Stev
e Ta
ylor
2.0
Que
stio
ns o
n us
ual t
rans
it op
port
unity
eva
luat
ion
R
oche
-NC
E
By
Ray
nald
Led
oux,
to a
ll.
How
do
the
STO
and
OC
Tra
nspo
usu
ally
eva
luat
e ne
w r
oad
corr
idor
s or
mod
ifica
tions
to e
xist
ing
road
co
rrid
ors,
as p
ossib
le o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or th
eir
tran
sit s
yste
m?
Ans
wer
s:
�O
C T
rans
po: U
sual
ly tr
ansi
t eva
luat
ion
oppo
rtuni
ty is
bas
ed o
n th
e re
side
ntia
l and
com
mer
cial
de
velo
pmen
ts p
roje
cts.
As r
oad
deve
lopm
ents
follo
w th
ese
deve
lopm
ents
, the
tran
sit o
ppor
tuni
ty
eval
uatio
n is
usu
ally
alre
ady
com
plet
ed w
hen
road
dev
elop
men
ts a
re p
lann
ed –
or b
oth
are
mad
e si
mul
tane
ousl
y. A
cos
t/ben
efit
anal
ysis
is c
ondu
cted
bas
ed o
n th
e fo
llow
ing
para
met
ers:
cha
nges
in tr
ansi
t tra
vel t
imes
, cha
nges
in tr
ansi
t tra
vel c
osts
(for
the
user
s and
OC
Tra
nspo
) and
cha
nges
in tr
ansi
t rid
ersh
ip.
Usu
ally
a g
ain
in tr
avel
tim
es g
ener
ates
an
incr
ease
in tr
ansi
t rid
ersh
ip. C
ompa
ring
cost
s and
ben
efits
lead
s to
a tr
ansi
t pla
nnin
g de
cisi
on.
�ST
O: a
tran
sit o
ppor
tuni
ty e
valu
atio
n is
ofte
n m
ade
whe
n ne
w c
olle
ctor
road
s are
pla
nned
. If a
n op
portu
nity
for t
rans
it oc
curs
, eff
ects
of a
tran
sit n
etw
ork
deve
lopm
ent a
re e
valu
ated
. A G
atin
eau’
s ad
viso
ry c
omm
ittee
revi
ews a
ll ne
w ro
ad d
evel
opm
ents
. Thi
s com
mitt
ee is
a so
urce
of i
nfor
mat
ion
for t
he
trans
it pl
anni
ng te
am. A
t a m
ore
stra
tegi
c le
vel,
i.e. r
egar
ding
the
arte
rial r
oads
, a tr
ansi
t opp
ortu
nity
ev
alua
tion
is a
lso
mad
e. H
owev
er, i
t is k
now
n to
day
that
on
the
river
cro
ssin
gs, t
he tr
ansi
t mod
al sp
lit is
hi
gh a
nd te
nds t
o in
crea
se, a
s the
re is
a li
mite
d ca
paci
ty fo
r veh
icle
s on
thes
e lin
ks. A
new
rive
r cro
ssin
g w
ill m
ost p
roba
bly
lead
to a
dec
reas
e of
the
trans
it m
odal
split
, as c
apac
ities
for a
ll ve
hicl
es (i
nclu
ding
car
s an
d bu
ses)
will
incr
ease
. The
STO
not
es th
at th
ere
is n
o sp
ecifi
c ev
alua
tion
tool
use
d fo
r thi
s kin
d of
ev
alua
tion
at th
is d
ay, b
ut th
ey in
tend
to u
se o
ne o
r mor
e on
a m
ore
syst
emat
ic w
ay.
3.0
Tra
nsit
eval
uatio
n m
etho
dolo
gy a
nd c
rite
ria
– pr
esen
tatio
n an
d co
mm
ents
Afte
r a b
rief p
rese
ntat
ion
on th
e tra
nsit
eval
uatio
n m
etho
dolo
gy a
nd c
riter
ia p
ropo
sed
by R
oche
/NC
E (w
hich
was
se
nt b
y e-
mai
l prio
r to
the
pres
ent m
eetin
g), a
dis
cuss
ion
ende
d up
on
the
follo
win
g de
cisi
ons:
�Th
e TR
AN
S m
odel
sim
ulat
es 1
0 20
31-s
cena
rios w
ith a
new
inte
rpro
vinc
ial c
ross
ing,
but
with
out a
ny n
ew
trans
it lin
e us
ing
it. T
here
is a
gap
bet
wee
n th
e in
form
atio
n ne
eded
to e
valu
ate
trans
it op
portu
nitie
s and
the
info
rmat
ion
gene
rate
d fr
om th
e cu
rren
t mod
el ru
ns.
�A
fter a
shor
t dis
cuss
ion,
it is
dec
ided
that
20
new
sim
ulat
ions
will
be
run
to in
clud
e a
new
bus
line
on
the
inte
rpro
vinc
ial c
ross
ings
. Mor
e pr
ecis
ely:
Roc
he-N
CE
an
d al
l
Page
3
o10
203
1-sc
enar
ios w
ith a
bus
rout
e on
the
new
road
cro
ssin
g (1
scen
ario
= 1
new
road
cro
ssin
g =
with
1 b
us ro
ute)
, with
a h
igh
leve
l fre
quen
cy a
nd n
o tra
nsfe
r pen
alty
; o
10 2
031-
scen
ario
s with
a b
us ro
ute
on th
e ne
w ro
ad c
ross
ing
(1 sc
enar
io =
1 n
ew ro
ad c
ross
ing
= w
ith 1
bus
rout
e), w
ith a
revi
sed
freq
uenc
y le
vel b
ette
r fitt
ing
the
prev
ious
ly id
entif
ied
trans
it tra
vel d
eman
d.
oA
ll ne
w b
us ro
utes
will
be
sim
ple
bus r
oute
s lin
king
the
2 cr
ossi
ng e
nds.
�
The
final
tran
sit re
late
d cr
iteria
wou
ld b
e th
e fo
llow
ing
quan
titat
ive
base
d ev
alua
tion:
o
Cha
nges
(bet
wee
n 20
31 d
o no
thin
g sc
enar
io o
r the
10
2031
-sce
nario
s with
out a
ny b
us li
nk, a
nd
the
20 n
ew sc
enar
ios w
ith b
us ro
utes
on
new
cro
ssin
gs) i
n:
�Tr
ansi
t tra
vel t
imes
(OD
tran
sit t
rave
l tim
e m
atric
es);
�Tr
ansi
t mod
al sp
lit o
n sp
ecifi
c sc
reen
line
s.
4.0
Follo
win
g ac
tions
:
1.R
e-de
finiti
on o
f the
tran
sit e
valu
atio
n cr
iteri
a
2.D
efin
ition
of t
he n
ew b
us r
oute
s and
freq
uenc
ies o
n th
e cr
ossi
ngs (
to b
e de
fined
for
sim
ulat
ions
)
3.Si
mul
atio
n of
new
scen
ario
s (20
)
4.M
easu
rem
ent o
f tra
nsit
eval
uatio
n cr
iteri
a pe
rfor
man
ce fo
r al
l 10
new
cro
ssin
gs
Roc
he-N
CE
OC
Tra
nspo
an
d ST
O
City
of O
ttaw
a
Roc
he-N
CE
5.0
Nex
t mee
ting
–
•T
he n
ext m
eetin
g da
te w
ill b
e se
lect
ed w
hen
all r
esul
ts w
ill b
e av
aila
ble
and
proc
esse
d.
Roc
he-N
CE
6.0
Adj
ourn
men
t
Rec
orde
d by
/Enr
egis
tré p
ar: R
ayna
ld L
edou
x, N
atha
lie S
chai
llée
cc.
All
atte
ndin
g / p
rése
nts
A
ll ab
sent
/ ab
sent
s
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final raft 07/29/2008
APPENDIX 2: STO TRANSIT NETWOR – 2008 SO R E: WWW STO OM
11 17 31 48
PR. D
U PO
RTAG
E
HÔTEL-
DE-VI
LLE
LAURI
ERLA
URIER1 5 20
21 25
26 27
29
33 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
44 45
46 47
57 59
67 77
1 5 20
21 25
26 27
29 33
35 36
37 38
39 40
41
44 45
46 47
57 59
67 77
1 5 20
25 26
27 29
36 37
38 39
40 41
44 45
46 47
57 59
67 77
3121
33 35
31
57 67 77 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 94 98
PLA
CE D
’ACC
UEI
L
Cam
pus
Félix
-Lec
lerc
27
CHVO
Hul
l
H
Édifi
ceLo
uis
Sain
t-La
uren
t
Casi
no L
ac L
eam
y
Ath
oll-
Dou
ne /
D’H
oche
laga
Pink
/ de
la S
apin
ière
De
l’Eur
ope
/Pi
nk
Des
Gri
ves
/Sa
int-
Raym
ond
Fron
t /Co
rmie
rBr
oad/
Boul
. de
l’Out
aoua
is
Wilf
rid-L
avig
ne /
Boul
. des
Allu
met
ière
s
49
Mau
rice-
Dupl
essi
s /Kl
ock
Pink
/A
ugus
te-M
ondo
ux
11
Gab
riel
le-R
oy
17
3331
35
3736
49
Aré
na d
e To
urai
ne
Plac
e de
la C
ité
Sain
t-Lo
uis
/La
Vér
endr
ye
89
Du
Bar
ry /
Lavé
rend
rye
86
80
De
la C
ité /
De
l’Oas
is
85
Labr
osse
/La
Vér
endr
ye
Dav
idso
n /
De
Saut
erne
s
81
8390
Jean
-Lou
is-M
alet
te /
De
l’Aér
opor
t
74En
can
Laro
se
74
7496
98
84
Atm
ec /
Chev
al B
lanc
88
2
Pré-
Tunn
ey /
Tran
sitw
ay O
C Tr
ansp
o
UQ
O
PLA
CE D
’ACC
UEI
L
7271
76
7888
7888
7778
9082
Parc
-o-b
us J
ean-
René
-Mon
ette
Lign
e 30
0Le
mar
di e
t jeu
di,
cons
ulte
z vot
re g
uide
.
Parc
-o-b
us R
oute
148
et G
eorg
es
Parc
-o-b
us R
iver
mea
dPa
rc-o
-bus
de
l’Hip
podr
ome
Parc
-o-b
us O
ld C
hels
ea
Parc
-o-b
us S
aint
-Ale
xand
reVi
gnet
te re
quis
e
Parc
-o-b
us E
ncan
Lar
ose
Parc
-o-b
us P
ierr
e-La
font
aine
33
6739
7157
7463
7778
96
66 76
Parc
-o-b
us L
es P
rom
enad
esVi
gnet
te re
quis
e
Parc
-o-b
usG
aler
ies
Aylm
er
Parc
-o-b
us S
aint
e-Ro
se-d
e-Li
ma
Dir
ec
tio
n
Ga
bri
elle
-Ro
y
Dir
ec
tio
nO
tta
wa
Mar
ie-B
urge
r /D
e la
Min
e
15
2021
66
2733
3839
2831
33
3536
3949
Aré
na d
eM
asso
n
9496
Aré
na d
eM
asso
n
9496
Chem
inLé
pine98
VERS
AYL
MER
VERSGABRIELLE-ROY
35
26
21
2540
4041
4445
46
4749
5152
53
5457
5859
4441 46
49
5152
57
4547
53
48
5429
2858
Parc
-o-b
usSa
int-
Dom
iniq
ue
Parc
-o-b
us F
reem
an
Parc
-o-b
us L
orra
in
CHVO
Gat
inea
u
OTT
AWA
Sect
eur
GAT
INEA
U
Sect
eur
AYLM
ER
Sect
eur
HU
LL
Sect
eur
MA
SSO
N-A
NG
ERS
Sect
eur
BU
CK
ING
HA
M(v
oir
cart
e ci
-hau
t)
Sect
eur
BU
CK
ING
HA
M
Sect
eur
MA
SSO
N-A
NG
ERS
Le p
arco
urs
se p
ours
uit
jusq
u’à
Des
Cèdr
es
et S
aint
e-Él
isab
eth
Le p
arco
urs
se
pour
suit
jusq
u’à
l’égl
ise
Sain
t-Clé
men
tde
Far
m P
oint
a.m
.
p.m
. AST
ICO
U
74 9
4 9
6
a.m.
H
HH
DE CANNES
DE CANNES
DE LA
VÉRENDRYE
ALAIN
DE TOURAINE
D’AU
VERG
NE
GATI
NEA
U
LA G
APPE
DE P
IEDM
ONT
DE L
OIRE
T
SAINT-LOUIS
DE BOURGOGNE
ROUTE 105
SAINT-LOUISLEBA
UDY
LE R
OY
DU S
OMM
ELIE
R
DES ÉR
ABLES
SAINT-A
LEXANDRE
POIRIER
PAQU
IN
DE L
A SA
VAN
E
DES ANCIENS
DE L’ÉR
ABLIÈRE LO
UIS-
RIEL
LAFR
ENIÈ
RE
MOREAU
RODOLPHE
SAIN
T-LO
UIS
DE L
AUSA
NN
E
LA G
APPE
DU C
ARRE
FOUR
DE L’HÔPITAL
ERNEST-GABOURY
DE L’HÔPITAL
DU BARRY
LA SARRE
BOUR
ASSA
CLÉR
ICY BONAVENTURE
CHAM
BLY
DU B
ARRY
P. L
AFON
TAIN
E
DE SILLERY
DE L
A GA
PPE
GRÉBER
ORLÉ
ANS
DE ROUVILL
EDE
LA
DRAV
E
NELLIGAN
LA V
ÉREN
DRYE
LA V
ÉREN
DRYE
MAIN
DAVIDSON
LABROSSE
LA V
ÉREN
DRYE
PAIEMENT
DE L’O
ASIS
PAIEMENT
SAIN
T-RE
NÉ
MAIN
LAFRANCE
MAG
NUS
MAL
ONEY
MALO
NEY
GRAV
ELIN
E GOUI
N
DUQU
ETTE MAIN
LAVIOLETTE
RAYMOND
MIGNEAULT
CAN
IPCO
NOTR
E-DA
ME
SAIN
T-AN
DRÉ
LORRAIN
SAIN
TE-R
OSE
DES SABLES
CHÂT
EAUG
UAY
MAL
ONEY
SAIN
T-RE
NÉ
SAIN
T-RE
NÉRE
NÉ-
MAR
ENGÈ
RE
DE L
A SA
VAN
E
NOB
ERT
DAVI
DSON
GRÉB
ER
DUGA
S
NOB
ERT
LEMAY
DES FLANDRES
LAM
ARCH
E
MON
T-LU
C
COLE
TTE
STÉP
HANE
GRÉBER
AUTOROUTE 50
ROUT
E 14
8
DES LAURENTIDES
DE LA FORTERESSE
LOMBARD
GEORGES
BOUCHARD
DU
PRO
GRÈ
S
ROU
TE 1
48
DE
L’ARÉ
NA
DE L’AÉROPORT
NILPHAS-RICHER
DE P
OIN
TE-
GATI
NEA
U
DE
POIN
TE-
GAT
INEA
U
BELLEHUMEUR
DE LA CITÉ
1 5 33 395 3
3 39
1
5 80
39 8
0
33 89
33 8
9
89
39
3939
787839
74 77 96
39 89
89
39 80
87
66 87
66 87
66
87
33 66
39 80
87
33 39
66 86
66 86
66
66
6666
33 6
6 71
66
86
80 87 88 94 98
84 86
9076
81
81 82 83 84 85 86 90
57 67 77
63
63 57 67 7763
80 87 88 94 98
5
6666
CÔTE
S-DE
S-NEI
GES
80 87
88 89
94 98
57 67
77 81
82 83
84 85
86 90
81 82 83 84 85 86 90
57 67
77
67
67 77
LE G
ALLO
IS
AUT
OROU
TE 5
0
1
3
AUT
OROU
TE 5
0
GUIL
LEM
ETTE SABOURIN
DE C
ÔTÉV
ILLE
DUBO
IS
NAPOLÉON-GROULX
LORRAIN
DES
HIRO
NDE
LLES
CHEVAL BLANC DES
PERD
RIX
DES
PERD
RIX
GEORGES
LOMBARD
BOUCHARD
BERT
RAND
CHAR
ETTE
PIER
RE-L
APOR
TECU
RÉ-R
OY
L'AB
BÉ
BERGERON
BRI
DG
EKENNY
MAC
LARE
N
DE BUCKINGHAM DE BUCKINGHAMJEA
N-X
XIII BÉLANGER
MACLAREN EST
CHUR
CH
JAMES
KEN
NED
Y
DE L’
ARÉN
A
96 98
96 98
98
96
94 9
6
ROUTE 309
96 98
96
98
Mar
ché
Buc
king
ham
DES
ALLU
MET
TIÈR
ES
DES
ALLU
MET
TIÈR
ES
BAGO
T
PRIN
CIPA
LE
BROO
K
ARTH
UR-C
ROTE
AU
ARBU
TUS
DU P
ATRI
MOI
NE
MAU
RICE
-DUP
LESS
IS
COOK
COOK
BAIL
LIE
DE B
ISCA
Y
DES
MON
TAGN
AIS
AUGU
STE
MON
DOUX
DES
MAN
OIRS
SAINT-M
ALO
H
BROUAGE
DE PORT ROYAL
D’HOCHELAGA
ATH
OLL
-DO
UN
E
McC
ONNE
LL
CHEM
IN D
’AYL
MER
LAM
OURE
UX
GLEN
WOO
D
LUCERNE
LAKEWYCHWOOD
PINE
BELMONT
BORDEAUX
FRASER
VICTOR-BEAUDRY
RIVERMEAD
COTÉ
ATHOLL-DOUNE
VANIER
VANIER
JEAN-DE LA FONTAINE
VANIER
WILFRID-LAVIGNE
KLOCK
BROAD
SAMUEL-EDEY
DU VALLON
DE LA COLLINE
CORMIER
FRONT
TER.
EAR
DLEY
BOURGEAU
CHAR
TIER
DU C
AVEA
U
ÉLIZ
ABET
H
LEGU
ERRI
ER
PERRY
DES SAISONS
GRANDE-ALLÉE
48
48
48
48
48
48
25 4
925
25 28
25 26
49
25 49
28 5
8
28 58
48
CHEM
IN D
’AYL
MER
VANIER
CHEMIN DE LA
MONTA
GNE
BEAULAC
EARDLEY
LATT
ION
DE L
A CO
LOM
BIN
E
GOLD
ENRO
D
PR. D
E L’O
UTA
OU
AIS
DE L’
ÉGLA
NTI
NE
TRAN
SITW
AY
SCOT
T
HOLLAND
ROSS
ROY
PIN
K
PIN
K
PIN
K
CITÉ-DES-JEUNES
RIEL
ISABELLE
SAIN
T-RA
YMON
D
SAIN
T-RA
YMON
D
AUTO
ROUT
E 5
DUSSAULT
KINGEDWARD
WEL
LIN
GTO
NMAISONNEUVE
FOURNIER
RID
EAU
CITÉ-DES-JEUNES
THÉR
IEN
BÉDARD
CORBEIL
JUM
ONVI
LLE
LUCI
EN-B
RAUL
T
DANIEL-JOHNSON
MON
T-BL
EU
RIELPHILIAS-FORTIN
JOLI
COEU
R
SAINT-JOSEPH
SAINT-JOSEPH
ÉMOND
JEAN-PROULX
AD
RIEN
-RO
BER
T
EDMONTON
MUTCHMORE
DE LA CARRIÈRE
MON
TCLA
IR
GAM
ELIN
DES
HA
UTE
S-PL
AIN
ES
DE LA GALÈNE
27 35
27 35
33
1 5 20 27 38 39
27 33
11 31
11 31 1111
31
11 36
48
17
31
40 49
52
44 46
46
40
4547
53
47 51
47 51
47
51
47
47 51
47 4
9 51
52
53 5
7
47 51
45 53
53
45 53
45 53
45 47
53
45 47
45 53
40 41
44 46
4951
52 57
52
45 53
40 4
1 44
45
46 4
757
58
59
40 49 52
44 46 49 52 57
44 4649 52
44 49 5249 52
44 49 52
41 51
41 51
41 51 41
51
44 49
52
40
31 39
31 31
57
31 3949
1 5 27
31 33
20 21
21 31 33 35
20 21 31 33 35
21 3
1 33
35
25 26
29 36
3739
40 41
44 45
46 47
57 59
1 5 20
25 26
27 29
36 37
3839
40 41
44 45
46 47
4859
67 77
80 81
82 83
8485
86 87
88 89
90 94
98
1 33 36 37 38 39
35
20 21 35 38
17 36
37
17 36
37
17 3637
1 38
39
5 20 21 27
11 17 4811 17 31 57
11 17
21 31
3335
48
11 17
48
80 87
88 89
94 98
11 17
48
48
17 36
3717 36
37
1 17 36 37 38
11 31 33 35 33 35 49
35
35
27 3
3
33
33 49
28 39
48 49
28 39
48
33 39
48 49
33 35
3633
36
28 39
28 39
49
26 49
26
26
26
26
25 26 28 39
25 26 28 29 39
25 26
4949
54
54
54
54
5454
49
49
49
49
31 39
49
35
35
20 21 36 37 38
1 5 27 33
33
36 37
28 29
39
37 38 39
FREE
MAN
SAINT-JOSEPH
TACH
É
PR. DU PORTAGE
HÔTEL-
DE-VILL
ELA
URIER
YORK
LABELLE
SACR
É-CO
EUR
DES
ALLU
MET
TIÈR
ES
LAURIER
MU
RRAY
EDDY
DES
ALLU
MET
TIÈR
ES MONTCALM
LAVAL
PINK
DE LA GRAVITÉ
DE L’EUROPE
DU
TRO
PIQ
UE
DE LA BRISE
DES GRIVES
DU CUMULUS
DU
STR
ATU
S
DEL’A
TMOSPHÈRE
DE
L’ATM
OSP
HÈR
E
DE
LA N
ÉBU
LEU
SE
DU P
LATE
AU SAINT-RAYMOND
DES
TREM
BLES
DES
GRIV
ES
DES TREMBLES
21 33 31
35
67 77
CUMBERLAND
DALHOUSIE
31 57 77
ALBANEL
5 20 2
1 27
5 21 27
20
39 39
39
SAIN
T-DO
MIN
IQUE
DE LU
CERN
E
57 77
67 77
57 67
77
20 21
3536
37 38
38
57 77
57
Terr
asse
s de
la C
haud
ière
ELGIN
METCALFE
ALB
ERT
KENT
QU
EENBAY
21
LAU
RIER
94
28
28
SAINT-RÉDEMPTEUR
76 8
1
83 9
071
83
71 8
5
76 85
76 85
76
76
85
83 85
83
83
77 81
77
77
77 82
78 8
278
82
78 8
2
8233 78
77
82
63 8
263
81
33
33
74 7
7 81
96
33 71 81
71
76 8
1
81
74
84 9
6
74
94 9
6
74
94 9
6
94
94 9
8
94 98
74
9674
84
96
88
88
78
78 8
8
78
78
88 78
88
88 94
98
88 94
98
71 9
0
71 7
6
7676
71
71
71
71 9
0
71 76 90
90
72
72
72
72 78
78
72 78
88 9
4 98
78 8474 96
74 84
96
78
74 84
90 96
33 7
4 77
96
84 9
0
63
981 5 27
Pont
des
Dra
veur
s
Pont Alonzo-Wright
Pont Lady-AberdeenRi
vièr
e de
s Out
aoua
is
Riviè
re de
s Out
aoua
is
Rivière Gatineau
Pont
du
Por
tage
Pont Alex
andr
a
Pont Mac
dona
ld-Car
tier
Pont
Ch
ampl
ain
52
LIGN
E
51
LIGN
E
53
LIGN
E54
POIN
TE63
LIGN
E
59
LIGN
E
20
POIN
TE1
POIN
TE5
POIN
TE11
EXPR
ESS17
EXPR
ESS
21
LIGN
E25
POIN
TE2
7PO
INTE
26
POIN
TE28
POIN
TE29
POIN
TE31
LIGN
E
33
LIGN
E
35
LIGN
E
36
LIGN
E
37
LIGN
E
38
LIGN
E
39
LIGN
E40
POIN
TE41
POIN
TE44
POIN
TE45
POIN
TE46
POIN
TE47
POIN
TE48
POIN
TE49
LIGN
E
57
POIN
TE58
POIN
TE66
LIGN
E
67
LIGN
E80
EXPR
ESS81
EXPR
ESS82
EXPR
ESS83
EXPR
ESS84
EXPR
ESS85
EXPR
ESS86
EXPR
ESS
88
EXPR
ESS89
EXPR
ESS
87
EXPR
ESS
90
EXPR
ESS
72
LIGN
E
71
LIGN
E
74
LIGN
E
76
LIGN
E
77
LIGN
E
78
LIGN
E94
INTER
ZONE
98
INTER
ZONE
96
LIGN
E
300
LIGN
E
N
Parc
-o-b
us G
rébe
r
FRANK-ROBINSON
EUGÈ
NE-D
AGEN
AIS
WEL
LINGT
ON
Des
Éra
bles
/D
u So
mm
elie
r
87
Parc
-o-b
usCe
ntre
Rob
ert-
Gue
rtin
Vign
ette
requ
ise
Lége
nde
Term
inus
Lign
e ex
pres
s et
inte
rzon
e
Lign
e ré
guliè
re
Lign
e de
poi
nte
seul
emen
t
Parc
ours
occ
asio
nnel
(voi
r hor
aire
dét
aillé
)
Lign
e de
pas
sage
00
Term
inus
de
la li
gne
0
000
Term
inus
Cum
berl
and/
Ride
au1,
5, 2
0, 2
5, 2
6, 2
7, 2
9, 3
6, 3
7, 3
8,
39, 8
0, 8
1, 8
2, 8
3, 8
4, 8
5, 8
6, 8
7,
88, 8
9, 9
0, 9
4 et
98
Term
inus
Kin
g Ed
war
d21
, 31,
33,
35,
67
et 7
7
Term
inus
Yor
k40
, 41,
44,
45,
46,
47
et 5
9
1 2 3
TER
MIN
US
D’O
TTAW
A
p.m
.
Lign
e 83
: Te
rmin
us e
n av
ant-m
idi s
eule
men
t.Te
rmin
us e
n ap
rès-
mid
i au
coin
de
Nob
ert e
t Pai
emen
t.
a.m
.
SO
CIÉ
TÉ
DE
TR
AN
SP
OR
TD
E
L'
OU
TA
OU
AI
S
Les
mod
ifica
tions
app
orté
es a
u pa
rcou
rs d
e ce
rtai
nes
ligne
s d’
auto
bus
depu
is la
par
utio
n du
Gui
de a
nnue
l 200
7-20
08 n
e fig
uren
t pas
sur
cet
te c
arto
grap
hie.
08/0
7
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final raft 07/29/2008
APPENDIX : O TRANSPO TRANSIT NETWOR – 2008 SO R E: WWW O TRANSPO OM
QU
ÉBEC
ON
TAR
IO
QU
ÉBEC
ON
TAR
IO
C.N
.R.
C.N
.R.
C.N.
R.
C.N.
R.
C.N.
R.
C.P.R.
C.N.R
.
Tunnel
6061
6263
6465
66
68 263
9610
116
718
226
126
2
6061
6 2
6364
65
6896
101
167
261
262
263
Con
vent
Gle
n
Orl
éans
Gar
den
Glo
uces
ter
Cen
tre
Bea
con
Hill
9510
110
211
8
Req
uest
sto
p /
Arr
êt s
ur d
eman
de
7
7
2
2
2
22
124
127
127
127
129
15
15
128
127
127
128
128
128
128
125
128
128
125
125
128
5
3
31
5 75
71
5
5
5 5
3 3
86
8
851616 85
85
85
85
148
8
88
149
149
148
148
148
148
149
149
149
149
8485
111
84
125
125
86
86
3
103
14
18
18
18
18
14
15
1515
2
25
7
5 75
14
14
7 7
512
9
123
123
124
124
124
123
129
7X
29
190129
190
190
190
29
15
29
129
55
111
29
190
24 24
24
194
126
128
125
128
2394
94
9494
9494
94
232
232
232
232
232
232
192
191 19112
5
126
125
125
125
8518
111
84
23
232
192
192
192
86
86 111
111
111
191
39
30
2134
23
3133
36
36
22
22
221
221
22 20
20
20
20
30
20
27
20
2235
27
27
35
35
3521
21
27
3232
32
32
37
38
3737
3738
36
38
38
3939
3938
193
193
95
33
33
33
31
31
25
25
2525
25
25
231
231
231
231
231
231
231
23
23
23
232
34
3434
3130
30
36 135
135
130
135 13
0
136
136
136
136
135
135
13513
6
137
137
127
127
137
130
130
130
131
130
130
130 130
135
136
130
131
31 131
131
131 32 13
1125
127
131
131
131
131
125
125
125
125
137
137
131
131
136
32
57
55
55
86
176
176
151
2
2
18
18
18
87
156
18
151
16
16
218 151
16
8585
156
156
174
1618
8515
1
101
156
151
151
152
154
154
166
172
8559
59
2 97 172
14
14
14
14
151
55
57
55
5551
51
86 176
6
856
101
101
14
187
51
51
15
50
15 187
187
82
102
102
15
57
87
4
7
14
7
5
16
16
16
5
14
18
2
5
1631
6
316
306
306
3
130
6
1 330
63
306
316
215
714
181
14 31
6
316
316
316
3
8
3
1618
316
2
2
151
151
156
8597
154
118
179
152
6116
716
9
164
164
169
169
16161
62
85
169
97X 18
2
167
154
10196
D96
181
166
156
116
50
182
59
156
2 156
1618
1818
87 156
218
151
85
6 1414
14
85
410
1
101
6 85
101
3
4
101
6
66
45
16
16
316 6
316
101
102
5
316
2 7
24
7
306
306
5
5 16
316
7
140
140
115
5
107
8 111
14114
1
184
143
142
144
197
40
82
82
8
111
141
111
141
111
141
1
1
811
114
114
6
118
111
107
140
111
140111107
87
115
3
107
107
107
3
3 111
118
86
3
1414
216
1766 6
18
2
316
316
180
88
88
27
105
105
180
40
8
E84
84
C84
C84
147
87
146
87
146
147
14514
6
146
87
142
144
197
143
143
143
84
82
8288
88
88
88
103
140
82
E84
191
191
43
40
40
43
4040
40
43 1
1
1
14414
2
144
142
142
197
87 97
97
116
144
144
197
197
171
171
186
186
173
173
173 18
1
70
Futu
reFu
tur
7676
73
73
71
73
73
170
170
181
181
70
283
283
283
283
76
173
173
170
170
176
176
176
145
170
95 181
186
171
76 173
186
7095
170
188
70
767077
71
7777
77
171
170
170
178
172
172
172
67
174
174
174
179
179
67 172
181
67
67
179
152
152
118
152
166
166
166
118
181
181
181
188
116
176
156
116
176
176
176
176
156
57
3
3
107
1073
111
8686
111
116
116
156
176
156
176
176
116
111
3
176
176
116
147
147
116
57
57
157
157
157
57
45
4545
145
45
45
45
45
186
186
45
145
145
145
145
116
145
147
156
57 111
151
118
118
55
55
118
174
186
86
51
51
102
102
102
102
50
172
50
116
182
116
59
59
182
116
116
166
166
166
101
167
165
165
101
101
101
160
160
168
160
160
168
160
160
160
165
165
168
168
168
164
169
169
169
169
169
182
182
AMAM
PMPM16
918
2166
182
169
169
169
182
101
60
169
182
65
60
65
65
65
68
68
6868
68
65
63D9
6
262
261
262
263
262
261
163
183
262
263
261
6363
64
167
169
167
169
62
64
6261
62
66
66
161
164
169
66
161
61 161
161
169
164
164
61
261
263
96
263
261
261
261
263
263
262
262
263
161
96
96
96
63
62
63
61
161
161
118
118
118
163
183
96
179
164
164
179 17
9
6917
911
8
118
118
16666
66
6616
6
166
166
69
69
69
66
AM AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM AM
PM AMPM AM
AM PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM96
130
130
2713
7
131
6496
160
Req
uest
sto
p /
Arr
êt s
ur d
eman
de
AMAM
PMPM
AM
PM
17017
1
176
171
170
71
77
71
73
176
170
173
170
170
181
34
3119
313
083
0
PMAM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
2021
2722
3031
32
3334
3536
3738
39
221
9510
1
AM
2021
2227
2524
3435
3637
38
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AMPM
PMAM
AM
AM
PM
PMAM
3031
3233
39
9510
119
410
211
8
102
118
221
AM
AM
PM PM
PMAM
84
AM
PM
AM
PMAM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AMPM
AM
283
283
283
AM
AM
PM
PM
To/V
ers
Notr
e-Da
me-
des-
Cham
ps,
Nava
n &
Sar
sfie
ld
T o/V
ers
C arls
bad
Sprin
gsVa
rs &
Bea
rbro
ok
To/V
ers
R ich
mon
d
To/V
ers
Mun
ster
Ham
let
To/V
ers
Cum
berla
nd V
illag
e
154
166
167
181
182
297
9610
117
2
U. C
arle
ton
U.
47
How
ard
Bus
Ser
vice
1-80
0-26
7-81
85
Mer
rickv
ille
Longfields
160
165
164
165
164
163
163
64
63
62
169
101
60
Bur
ritt's
Rap
ids
Kem
ptvi
lle
Nor
th G
ower
Kem
ptvi
lleTr
ansp
orta
tion
Serv
ices
613-
995-
8062
Kem
ptvi
lle
Nor
th G
ower
Vars Li
mog
esC
asse
lman
Em
brun
Rus
sell
Cry
sler
Che
ney B
ourg
etC
asse
lman
Cor
nwal
l
Ham
mon
d
Tran
spor
tTho
m1
800
465-
7254
ww
w.tra
nspo
rttho
m.c
om
Tran
spor
tTho
m1
800
465-
7254
ww
w.tra
nspo
rttho
m.c
om
Arn
prio
r
Almon
te
Paken
ham
Innisv
ille
Carleto
n Plac
e
Ant
rim
Perth
Cla
renc
e-R
ockl
and
613-
446-
6022
ww
w.cl
aren
ce-r
ockl
and.
com
Ledu
c B
us L
ines
613-
860-
3331
ww
w.le
ducb
us.c
om
Cumbe
rland
Wendo
ver
Hawke
sbury
L'Orig
nal
Alfred
Rockla
ndClaren
cePlan
tagen
et
PM
AM
24
117
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
117
117
117
117
117
117
117
Claridg
e
168
96 118
160
161
163 164 165
60 160
168
63
6010
1
169
Ber
gero
n B
us L
ines
613-
443-
1483
417
Bus
Lin
e61
3-76
4-21
92w
ww.
417b
uslin
e.co
mC
lare
nce-
Roc
klan
d61
3-44
6-60
22w
ww.
clar
ence
-roc
klan
d.co
m
Del
aney
Bus
Lin
es61
3-34
6-25
11
AMPM
22
Futu
reFu
tur
835
835
835
835
835
835
835
835
835
835
830
830
830
830 83
782
583
083
0
825
825
825
825
837
837
837
837
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
824
824
824
824
824
824
824
126
12894
824
824
824
824
830
837
825
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
873
824
824
AL
AE
A2
A6AK
A4
AV
AJ
A1
AX
AA
AN
AO
AQ
AU
A8
AP
AT
AZAH
AR
AG
AD
A9
A3
A5
ABAF
AC
AM
AI
A7
AY
AS
P5
P9
Wes
tbor
o
Moo
ney'
sB
ay
Bri
tann
ia
Île
Pet
rie
Isla
nd
1210
119
87
65
43
21
1210
119
87
65
43
21
A B C D E
A B C D E
Ile
Kettle
Island
Ile
Lemieux
Island
Dows
Lake Lac
Dow
Lac
Beauchamp
Lake
Lac
Leamy
Lake
Lac
McLaurin
Lake
Lac
McKay
Lake
Britannia
Bay
Graham
Bay
Crystal
Bay
Shirley's
Bay
Ottawa
Ri ver
Ri vi èr e
desOut a
ouai s
R i v iè r e
Gatine au
R iv er
Ottawa
River
R iv iè r
ed es
Out aouai s
RivièreR
id
eauRiv
er
Rivière
Rideau
Rivière
RideauRiver
CanalRidea
u
Lac
Lake
Deschênes
Rivière
J oc k
Ri ve r
RideauCanal
Peak
Rou
te :
Mon
day
to F
riday
, gen
eral
ly 6
-9 A
M &
3-6
PM
Circ
uits
de
poin
te :
Lun
di a
u ve
ndre
di, g
énér
alem
ent d
e 6h
à 9
h et
de
15h
à 18
h
Expr
ess
Rou
te :
Mon
day
to F
riday
, gen
eral
ly 6
-9 A
M &
3-6
PM
C
ircui
t Exp
ress
: Lu
ndi a
u ve
ndre
di, g
énér
alem
ent d
e 6h
à 9
h et
de
15h
à 18
h R
equi
res
Add
ition
al F
are
-Tar
if Su
pplé
men
taire
Req
uis
Sele
cted
tim
e pe
riods
onl
y(s
ee H
ours
of O
pera
tion
on re
vers
e si
de)
Pério
des
de te
mps
sél
ectio
nnée
s se
ulem
ent (
voir
les
heur
es d
e se
rvic
e au
ver
so)
161
161
2 0
20
15
Early
Mor
ning
Onl
y:
Rou
tes
oper
ate
gene
rally
4-6
AM
Serv
ice
lève
-tôt s
eule
men
t: C
es c
ircui
ts o
père
nt g
énér
alem
ent d
e 4h
à 6
h82
440
824
125
Reg
ular
Rou
te :
7 da
ys/w
eek
in m
ost t
ime
perio
ds (
see
Hou
rs o
f Ope
ratio
n an
d E
xcep
tions
on
reve
rse
side
)Le
s ci
rcui
ts ré
gulie
rs: 7
jour
s/se
mai
ne la
plu
part
du te
mps
(voi
r la
sect
ion
des
heur
es d
e se
rvic
e et
les
exce
ptio
ns a
u ve
rso)
Term
inus
:Beg
inni
ng o
r end
of r
oute
Term
inus
:Déb
ut o
u fin
d'u
n ci
rcui
t
Tran
sitw
ay s
ervi
ce a
nd s
tatio
nS
ervi
ce d
u Tr
ansi
tway
et s
tatio
nO
-Tra
in a
nd s
tatio
nO
-Tra
in e
t sta
tion
OC
Tran
spo
Sal
es a
nd In
form
atio
n C
entre
Ser
vice
s de
s ve
ntes
et d
e l'in
form
atio
n d'
OC
Tra
nspo
Park
/ Pa
rc
Hos
pita
l / H
ôpita
l
Oth
er p
oint
s of
inte
rest
Autre
s po
ints
d'in
térê
t
Inte
rcity
bus
( Vo
yage
ur, e
tc)
Auto
car (
Voya
geur
, etc
)S
hopp
ing
Cen
treC
entre
com
mer
cial
Sco
tiaba
nk P
lace
Spe
cial
Eve
nts
Pla
ce B
anqu
e S
cotia
Evé
nem
ents
spé
ciau
x
Maj
orPa
rk &
Rid
ePa
rc-o
-bus
prin
cipa
uxM
inor
Park
& R
ide
Parc
-o-b
us s
econ
daire
sB
ike
Rac
k / S
uppo
rt po
ur v
élo
Sch
ools
, are
nas,
poi
nts
of in
tere
st, e
tc. (
see
inde
x ot
her s
ide)
Éco
les,
aré
nas,
attr
aits
prin
cipa
ux, e
tc. (
voir
inde
x au
ver
so)
S1A1
K3
Bre
wer
Rid
eau
Hal
l
Bar
rhav
en
Taxi
Lin
k / R
elai
s Ta
xiH
Sca
le -
Éch
elle
1000
01
2
© C
opyr
ight
200
7Tr
ansi
t Ser
vice
s - T
rans
port
en c
omm
un
Effe
ctiv
e S
epte
mbe
r 2, 2
007
- Inf
orm
atio
n is
sub
ject
to c
hang
e w
ithou
t not
ice
En
vigu
eur l
e 2
sept
embr
e 20
07 -
Les
rens
eign
emen
ts p
euve
nt ê
tre m
odifi
ées
sans
pré
avis
TAXI
9495
9697
101
102
9495
9697
101
102
97
97
97
97
97 97
97
97
95
96
9610
196
9710
1
95
95
9596
9710
1
9596
97
9596
97
9596
97
9495
9697
102
9495
96
1011
02
97
9495
9697
101
95
95
96
97
97
9495
101
102
9495
101
102
Par
liam
ent
Par
lem
ent
Pla
ce d
uP
orta
ge
Les
Ter
rass
esde
la C
haud
ière
Pin
ecre
st
Mer
ival
e
Elm
vale
8586
111
8414
814
9
191
192
TE
RR
Y F
OX
Haz
elde
an
C.F
.I.A
.A
.C.I
.A.
Wal
ter
Bak
er
Falli
ngbr
ook
N.R
.C.
C.N
.R.C
Roc
kclif
fe
Lac
Leam
y La
ke
Par
c de
la G
atin
eau
Gat
inea
u P
ark
La B
aie
Rid
eau
Hal
l
Cas
ino
du L
ac L
eam
yLe
amy
Lake
Cas
ino
Her
onga
te
Bill
ings
Bri
dge
Bre
wer
Ferm
eex
péri
men
tale
Exp
erim
enta
lFa
rm
Vin
cent
Mas
sey
Hog
's B
ack
Moo
ney'
sB
ay
And
rew
Hay
don
Bri
tann
ia
Déf
ense
Nat
iona
le
Nat
iona
lD
efen
ce
Par
c In
dust
riel
Alb
ion
Indu
stri
al P
ark
Cen
tre
Com
mun
auta
ire
deG
louc
este
r S
.C
omm
unit
y C
entr
e
Par
c In
dust
riel
Haw
thor
neIn
dust
rial
Par
k
Ott
awa
Bus
ines
s P
ark
Par
c d'
affa
ire
d'O
ttaw
a
Ott
awa
Inte
rnat
iona
l Air
port
Aér
opor
t In
tern
atio
nal d
'Ott
awa
Linc
oln
Fiel
ds
Nor
tel C
arlin
g
Nep
ean
Nat
iona
lE
ques
tria
n P
ark
Shi
rley
's B
ayD
.R.D
.C. /
R.D
.D.C
.
Kan
ata
Nor
th B
usin
ess
Par
kP
arc
d'af
fair
e K
anat
a no
rd
Del
l
Par
c d'
affa
ire
Kan
ata
Sud
Kan
ata
Sou
thB
usin
ess
Par
k
Zel
lers
Pro
men
ade
of R
ichm
ond
Bay
shor
e
Can
met
E.M
.R.
Sco
tiab
ank
Pla
ceP
lace
Ban
que
Sco
tia
Wes
tgat
e
Bar
rhav
en C
ross
ing
The
Pla
za
Bar
rhav
en
Roc
kclif
fe A
irpo
rtA
érop
ort
Roc
kclif
fe
Aér
opor
t de
Gat
inea
uG
atin
eau
Air
port
Hin
du T
empl
e
Que
ensw
ayIn
dust
rial
Cam
pus
Cam
pus
indu
stri
elQ
ueen
sway
Pin
e V
iew
Mun
icip
al G
olf
Cou
rse
Ter
rain
de
golf
mun
icip
alP
ine
Vie
wW
alte
r B
aker
6263
6116
716
9PM
161
164
118
Mar
ketp
lace
181
186
173
PM95
170
171
71
957073
7176
77
188
873
Kan
ata
Cen
trum
Kan
ata
Tow
nC
entr
e
Man
otic
k
186
PM
Car
lingw
ood
EA
GLE
SO
N
TE
RO
N
BA
YS
HO
RE
SO
UT
H K
EY
S
AIR
PO
RT
AÉ
RO
PO
RT
GR
EE
NB
OR
O
WA
LKLE
Y
QU
EE
NS
WA
Y
LIN
CO
LN F
IELD
S
DO
MIN
ION
WE
ST
BO
RO
ST
. LA
UR
EN
T
LEB
RE
TO
N
BA
YV
IEW
CA
RLI
NG
CA
RLE
TO
N
CO
NFE
DE
RA
TIO
N
TU
NN
EY
'SP
AS
TU
RE
IRIS
BA
SE
LIN
E
FALL
OW
FIE
LD
ST
RA
ND
HE
RD
RIV
ER
VIE
W
ST
ITT
SV
ILLE
SM
YT
H
LEE
S
LAU
RIE
R
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
KIN
G
CA
MP
US
HU
RD
MA
N
TR
AIN
RIV
ER
SID
E
TR
IM
HE
RO
NB
ILLI
NG
S B
RID
GE
PLE
AS
AN
T P
AR
K
LYC
ÉE
CLA
UD
EL
MIL
LEN
NIU
M
95
94
9510
110
2JE
AN
NE
D'A
RC
Rid
eauv
iew
Com
. Cen
tre
Cen
tre
Com
. Rid
eauv
iew
Tri
nity
Com
mon
Tri
nity
Cro
ssin
gW
al-M
art
Orl
éans
Indu
stri
al P
ark
Par
c In
dust
riel
d'O
rléa
ns
PLA
CE
D'O
RLE
AN
S95
101
102
CY
RV
ILLE
9495
101
102
BLA
IR94
9510
110
2
BA
RR
HA
VE
NC
EN
TR
E
1618
85 1518
617
4
8715
115
6
101
9594
125
126
128
129
84
2120
2322
2425
2729
124
190
118
102
192
191
221
3031
3233
3438
3739
3635
231
232
147
5
129
128
1885
9594
8410
1
126
111
124
125
127
2122
2320
2427
2529
3031
3233
232
231
3438
3739
3635
221
192
191
190
CY
RV
ILLE
101
9594
124
126
128
129
2120
2322
2427
2530
3132
3334
3538
3736
39
232
825
824
825
825
221
190
9594
210
112
412
612
712
812
9
2122
2320
24
102
118
123
1527
2530
3132
33
3435
3837
3639
194
190
BLA
IR
JEA
NN
E D
'AR
CT
RA
IN
ST
. LA
UR
EN
T
WA
LKLE
Y
GR
EE
NB
OR
O
SO
UT
H K
EY
S
LYC
ÉE
CLA
UD
EL
&S
MY
TH
BIL
LIN
GS
BR
IDG
E
HE
RO
N
897
116
146
140
4043
8884
82
187
9714
084
116
143
145
144
146
147
142
140
4088
197
QU
EE
NS
WA
Y
IRIS
BA
SE
LIN
E
FALL
OW
FIE
LD
EA
GLE
SO
N
BA
YS
HO
RE
WE
ST
BO
RO
TU
NN
EY
'S P
AS
TU
RE
BA
YV
IEW
LIN
CO
LN F
IELD
S
DO
MIN
ION
LEB
RE
TO
N
HU
RD
MA
N
LEE
S &
CA
MP
US
487
8597
116
107
84118
140
148
146
149
4043
8245
45 45
45 45
1 148
45
887
9711
1
116
107
84
118
115
140
146
141
4043
82
48
8797
111
107
118
140
146
4043
8482
116
187
8497
116
143
146
145
144
147
142
4088
197
85
16 886
8795
9496
97
101
LEES
STA
TION
ONL
YST
ATIO
N LE
ES S
EULE
MEN
T
176
2120
2322
2427
2529
3031
3233
3435
3837
3945
3650
5143
40
102
55
5759
6061
6263
6665
6764
6968
7073
7176
7782
8884
124
156
172
178
182
221
262
232
261
231
263
283
8794
8618
168
395
9796
316
2122
2320
2415
2529
3031
3233
3435
3837
3945
3650
4355
5759
6263
6665
6764
6968
7071
7376
7782
8884
156
172
176
178
180
182
262
261
232
231
221
263
283
84
385
124
118
140
8486
176
148
146
149
8794
9596
9710
1
116
103
129
128
126
125
2120
2322
2425
2729
3031
3233
3435
3837
3936
5051
4345
4055
5760
5961
6263
6665
6764
6968
7073
7176
7784
8288
102
107
221
156
172
178
182
190
191
192
263
262
261
283
232
231
1618 17
8
8586
9596
9711
1
116
151
152
154
156
172
7073
7176
7716
7
169
179
182
188
262
261
263
283
8718
295
9697
151
5015
6059
6162
6364
6566
6768
6976
7370
7177
261
262
263
283
156
178
172
182
5060
5961
6263
6465
6667
6869
7076
7371
7726
126
226
3
283
156
172
178
182
1816
8687
9594
9697
151
617
6
5055
5715
6059
6162
6364
6566
6768
6976
7370
7177
262
261
263
283
82
187
105
172
156
102
178
182
1816
8687
9594
9697
176
5055
5715
6059
6162
6364
6566
6768
6976
7371
7077
8210
517
215
6
9616
416
0
163
AMAM
AM
101
6061
6264
65AM63
6816
716
9
285
9796
101
152
167
181
182
154
166
172
101
9695
86
116
111
151
152
156
172
178
6061
6263
6465
6667
6869
70
73
71
AMAM
AMAM
AMAM
AMAM
AMAM
AMAM
AM
124
AM
PM76
7726
2AM26
128
3AM26
316
717
918
8
9586
116
111
151
152
156
172
178
7071
7351
7776
179
188
9511
186
116
118
156
172
174
178
5755
157
7073
7177
7617
918
8
176
173
171
170
95
7371
7677
188
186
70
TE
RR
Y F
OX
9611
816
016
116
316
516
818
316
4
CA
RLI
NG
PMPM
221
231
221
PMPM
PM
AM
231
232
AM
125
101
131
130
101
95
127
130
131
135
136
137
212233
3437
3839
3231 20
2736
3530
3719
3
PLA
CE
D'O
RLÉ
AN
S
CA
RLE
TO
N
CO
NFE
DE
RA
TIO
N
262
261
263
283
178
102
182
856
101
74 4
8711
111
814
010
7
RIV
ER
SID
E&
PLE
AS
AN
T P
AR
K4
8797
116
107
84
118
140
148
146
149
4043
45 45
82
186
613-
560-
1000
305
8
613-
560-
1000
301
561
3-56
0-10
00 3
011
613-
560-
1000
301
2
613-
560-
1000
301
3
613-
560-
1000
301
4
613-
560-
1000
306
3
613-
560-
1000
306
2
613-
560-
1000
301
061
3-56
0-10
00 3
022
(LEE
S)
613-
560-
1000
303
0 (L
YCÉE
CLA
UD
EL)
613-
560-
1000
303
1 (S
MYT
H)
613-
560-
1000
302
1 (C
AM
PUS)
613-
560-
1000
302
3
613-
560-
1000
303
2 (R
IVER
SID
E)61
3-56
0-10
00 3
033
(PLE
ASA
NT
PAR
K)
613-
560-
1000
303
4
613-
560-
1000
303
8
613-
560-
1000
302
5
613-
560-
1000
302
4
613-
560-
1000
302
6
613-
560-
1000
302
7
613-
560-
1000
302
8
613-
560-
1000
307
0
95TR
IM 613-
560-
1000
136
961
3-56
0-10
00 3
037
613-
560-
1000
303
6
613-
560-
1000
303
5
613-
560-
1000
306
1
613-
560-
1000
306
0
613-
560-
1000
301
6
613-
560-
1000
304
3
613-
560-
1000
301
7
613-
560-
1000
305
5
613-
560-
1000
305
0
613-
560-
1000
307
5(P
ark
& R
ide
/ Par
c-o-
bus)
830
825
830
835
837
824
873
873
TE
RO
N
613-
560-
1000
301
8
EAST
BOUN
D ON
LYVE
RS L
'EST
SEU
LEM
ENT
117
117
ST
RA
ND
HE
RD
9518
1
186
613-
560-
1000
304
4
SO
CIÉ
TÉ
DE
TR
AN
SP
OR
TD
E
L'
OU
TA
OU
AI
S
Fors
ervi
cein
Gat
inea
u,pl
ease
cal
l STO
at81
9-77
0-32
42 o
r vis
it w
ww.
sto.
ca
Pour
lese
rvic
ed'
auto
bus
àG
atin
eau,
veui
llez
appe
lez
laS
TOau
819-
770-
3242
ouvi
site
zle
site
web
ww
w.st
o.ca
102
102
118
102
118
118
102
118
ST
ITT
SV
ILLE
96
613-
560-
1000
220
2
2222
119
3
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
MA
CK
EN
ZIE
KIN
G85
886
8794
9596
97
176
2120
2322
2427
2529
3031
3233
3435
3837
3945
3650
5143
4055
5759
6061
6263
6665
6764
6968
7073
7176
7782
8884
124
156
172
178
182
221
262
232
261
231
263
283
AM
613-
560-
1000
300
0
TAXI TAX
I
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
TAXI
7173
873
163
101
160
164
165
169
6065
68
8795
9697
Until
1 A
MJu
squ'
à 1
h
6061
105
1559
6061
6263
6465
6667
6869
For s
pec
ial s
ervi
ce t
o
even
ts a
t Sc
oti
aban
k Pl
ace,
ca
ll 61
3-74
1-43
90 o
r vis
it
ww
w.o
ctra
nsp
o.co
m
Pou
r le
serv
ice
spéc
ial a
ux
évén
emen
ts v
ers
la P
lace
Ban
qu
e Sc
oti
a, v
euill
ez c
om
po
ser l
e
613-
741-
4390
ou
vis
itez
w
ww
.oct
ran
spo.
com
Conn
exio
n
400
Conn
exio
n
400
Conn
exio
n
400
Roy
alO
ttaw
aC
ivic
St.
Vin
cent
Riv
ersi
de
H
H
HH
H
HH
H
H
H
HH
Mon
tfor
t
Gen
eral
Reh
ab.
CH
EO
/ H
EE
OC
FSU
UFS
C
Que
ensw
ay-
Car
leto
n
Elis
abet
hB
ruyè
re
CH
VO
CA
RP
TE
LES
AT
K
N
KO
K3
Z7
PDKX KG
KJ
KZ
KA
K7
Y3C
Z4
KK
K2
K8
Y4
Y5
Y7
Y6
Z5
K5K5
KC
K2
O
Alg
onqu
in C
olle
geC
ollè
ge A
lgon
quin
-Woo
drof
fe C
ampu
s-
U. o
f/d'O
ttaw
a
S6
SK
S5
SB
ED
SF
GL
SI
SX
E9
E6
E8
ET
S1
SO
E3 SQ
EA
S4
EJ
EH
SA
S2
E7
EMEG
SC
SR
EB
EN
S8EF
S7
E2
SU
EE
SN
ECSZ
SPSS
SL
EKSG
La C
ité
collé
gial
e
EU
EI
SH
EQ
E4
SE
Klon
dike
Fern
bank
Flew
elly
n
Hop
eS
ide
Tere
nce
Mat
thew
s
Pine Hill
Gla
mor
gan
McE
lroy
Mor
ton
Fern
bank
Cor
lyn
Cherry
Stittsville Main
Huntley
Shea
Liard
Shea
Iber
Carp
West Ridge
Beve
rly
Abbo
ttE.
Abbo
tt W
.
Haz
elde
an
Rickey
Banning
Abbe
yhill
Irwin Carbrooke
Haz
elde
an
Map
leG
rove
Ros
ehill
Silver Seven
Huntmar
Terry FoxMcCurdyKa
timav
ik
Eagleson
Varley
Teron
March
March
Herzberg
Ric
hard
son
Sola
ndt
Legget
Car
ling
Grandview
Hastin
gs
Bord
en
Carli
ng
Tim
m
Moodie
Rob
erts
on
Seyton
Richmon
d
Fitz
gera
ld
Richmond
Moodie
Wes
tHun
t Clu
bS
iski
n
Stra
ndhe
rd
Gorman
Flanders
Mar
avis
taCedarviewEat
on
Lynhar
Cor
ksto
wn
Discovery
Bradford
Britannia
Don
Reg
ina
Pinecrest Kelly
Cla
rend
a
Hen
ley
Seve
rnTavistock
Dumaurier
Rich
mon
dCar
ling
Nor
thsi
deB
asel
ine
Bas
elin
e
Morrison
Cassidy
Cedarview
Lisa
Bann
er
Fable
Lark
in
Barran
Tarta
nE
xete
r
Wes
sex
Jockvale
Jockvale
Cam
bria
n
Fran
ktow
n Joys
Ric
hmon
d
Cam
bria
n
Bar
nsda
le
Fourth Line
Gar
vin
Man
sfie
ld
Pondhollow
Cedarview
Bren
-Mau
r
Fallo
wfie
ldFa
llow
field
Richmond
Fallo
wfie
ld
Fallo
wfie
ld
Woodroffe
Woodroffe
Maj
estic
Newhaven
Kno
xdal
e
Tallw
ood
Woodroffe
Iris
McEwen
Ric
hmon
d
Woodroffe
Saville
Lockhart
Dov
erco
urt
Car
ling
Nav
aho
Navaho
Nav
aho
Erindale
Mea
dow
land
s
View
mou
ntM
edhu
rst
Merivale
Merivale
Vaa
n
Sla
ck
Bur
nban
k
Grenfell
Pratt
Gre
nfel
l
River
River
Ban
kfie
ldBr
idge
Shor
eline
Ear
lArm
stro
ng
Ambe
rwoo
d
Mac
Farla
ne
Deakin
Col
onna
de
Chesterton
Bas
elin
e
Merivale
Edg
eclif
fe
Rav
en
Lape
rriè
re
Cavan
Sum
mer
ville
Churchill
Cla
re
Kirkwood
IslandPark
McRae
Cle
arvi
ew
Lana
rk
Col
ombi
ne
Egla
ntin
e
Keyworth
NorthwesternFrederick Banting
Carleton
Byro
n
Holland
Sco
tt
Ric
hmon
d
Wel
lingt
on
Cre
rar
Shi
lling
ton
Hollington Fisher
Fisher
PrinceofWales
Riverside
Limebank
Res
earc
h
Thad
John
son
Canadair
Cro
il
Curtis
De
Niv
ervi
lle
Uplands
Hun
tClu
bH
unt C
lub
Leitr
imLe
itrim
Spr
att
Bla
is
Rid
eau
Fent
on
Albion
Bank
Lest
er
Bank
Lest
er
Que
ensd
ale
BankPa
ul A
nka
Pla
nte
Cah
ill
Upl
ands
McCarthy
Cah
ill
Fiel
ding
Sou
thm
ore
Wal
kley
John
ston
Southgate
Albion
Albion
Bank
Broo
kfie
ld
Kaladar
Springland
Flannery
Broo
kfie
ld
Riverside
CloverSun
nysi
de
Gro
ve
Seneca
Bank
Gle
be
Firs
t
O'Connor
Car
ling
Ora
ngev
ille
Cha
mbe
rlain
Rochester
Cat
herin
eA
rgyl
e
Isab
ella
Pre
toria
Stra
thco
naP
owel
l
Kent
Gla
dsto
ne
Bank
Cartier
Lyon
Bay
Som
erse
t
Sla
ter
Alb
ert
Sco
tt
Que
en
Preston
Booth
Popl
ar
Wel
lingt
on
Suss
ex
Bot
eler
Mur
ray
Rid
eau
MacKenzie
Dalhousie
King Edward
WurtemburgCharlotte
Laur
ier E
. Chapel
Som
erse
t E.
Man
n
WigginsRange
Alexander
John
Map
le
Springfield
Crichto
n
St. Charles
Gen
est
Marier
Ste.
Mon
ique Père
sBl
ancs
Lave
rgne
Granville
Mon
tfort
Mon
tréal
Alfred
St.Laurent
NorthRiver
McA
rthur
Dona
ldQ
ueen
Mar
y
Quill
Lola
Prin
ceAl
bertFrances
Bernard
St.Laurent
Indus
trial
Russell
Alta
Vista
Riv
ersi
de
Trem
blay
Michael
Paris
ien
Smyt
h
Plea
sant
Park
Kilb
orn
Delmar
Hai
g
AltaVista
Hero
n
Feat
hers
ton
Wal
kley
St.
Laur
ent
Tapi
ola
Ath
ans
Ros
ebel
la
Hun
t Clu
b
Dav
idso
n
Conroy
Leitr
imLe
itrim
Russell
Bloh
m
Kar
sh
John
ston
Conroy
Hawthorne
Arch
Cant
erbu
ry
Halifax
St.Laurent
Russell
Russell
Lancaster
Inne
sN
ewm
arke
t
Birch
Sand
ridge Br
ittany
Via
Venu
s
Codd's Carson's
DenHaag
Plu
mbe
rBa
llard
Lathe
Mat
heso
n
Charlton
Ogi
lvie
Mowat
Crownhill
Montré
al
Blair
Loyo
la
Qui
ncy
Delong
Wick
Cox
ford
Rothwell
Ogilvie
Eastvale
Lavérendrye
Blair
Howlett
Mea
dow
broo
k
Cyrville
Maxime
StarTop
Sheffield
Blackwell
Ande
rson
Can
otek
Polytek
St. J
osep
h
St.
Jose
ph
Bearbrook
Tauvette
Eastp
ark
Elgin
Pagé
Parkdale
Main
Riverdale
Lees
MerBleue
TenthLine
Blac
kbur
n
Blac
kbur
n
Mille
nniu
m
Inne
s
TenthLine
Champlain
Hiawatha
Orléans
Voyageur
Fortu
ne
Gre
yN
uns
Boyer
Belcourt
Inne
s
Ren
aud
Gle
neag
les
Prestwick
Des
Épin
ette
s
Woo
dfie
ld
Sixth
Poulin
Hen
ey
Cummings
Bell
Laurier
Eddy
St-L
aure
nt
Maisonneuve
Alex
andr
e-Ta
ché
Sain
t-Ray
mon
d
St-Louis
St-Joseph
Sacr
é-Co
eur
Fournier
Luce
rne
Aylm
er
Mal
oney
E.
Terry
Fox
March
Hines
Haanel
Iris
Dra
per
Brui
n
How
e
Cas
sels
Salin
a
Broadview ClydeClyde
McBride
Brid
ge/P
ont
Old
St.
Pat
rick Cobourg
Alexandra
Macdonald-C
artier
Parkway
Béla
nger
Jefferson
McG
illTyle
e
Michael
Elwood Ség
uin
Orchardview
Bilberry
Cedarview
CobbleHill
Trim
Trim
Trim
St. J
osep
h
Nor
thSe
rvic
eR
d.
Ryder
Rid
gebr
ook
Orléans
Merivale
Ray
mon
d
Eagleson
Eagleson
Eagleson
Cor
ksto
wn
Croydon
View
mou
nt
Shefford
DelaCarrière
Boul.del'Aéroport
Inne
s
Riverside
Cov
entry
Beav
erbr
ook
Castlefrank
Castlefrank
Mic
hael
Cow
plan
d
E questrian
Ston
ehav
en
Stee
plec
hase
Westcliff
e
Kenn
eval
eWeybridg
e
Foxf
ield
Cra
igHe
nry
Wes
t Hun
t Clu
b
Hem
min
gwoo
d
Cha
rlem
agne
Gardenway
Prin
cess
Loui
se
Chartrand
Duford
St.Georg
es
St. L
oui
s
Jean
ned'
Arc
DuG
rand
Bo
is
Byp
ass/
Roc
ade
Sout
hpar
k
Westp
ark
Ridg
ebur
n
Promenadedel'aéroport
Stev
enag
e
Hea
th
erington
Ages
Old
Inne
s
Bant
ree
Leed
s
Maj
or Amie
ns
Ear
l Mul
ligan
Kana
ta
Cam
peau
PrinceofWales
Queen
Eliz
abet
h
Wat
ters
C harle
mag
ne
Vant
age
Esprit
Scala
Beauséjou
r
Maitla
ndWoo
dwar
d
Southvale
Lorry
Gre
enb
erg
Aur
iga
Hu
nt ClubPontduPortageBridge
PontChaudièreBridge
Bridge/Pont
Bridge/Pont
TaylorCreek
Rockc
liffe
Par
kway
Roc
kclif
fePa
rkwa
y
Hem
lock
Beec
hwoo
d
Hog
'sB
ack
Shirl
ey'
s
Brook Helmsdale
Cad
ence
Gate
Bridgestone
Brid
lepa
rk
Gra
ssy
Plains
Greenbank
Greenbank
Greenbank
Greenbank
Long
field
s
Oriska
Sto
new
ay
Stra
ndhe
rd
Leikin
Alert
Brid
lep
ath
Clementine
D
ataCentre
CityParkW.
City
P
arkE.
For est Valley
Me adow
glen
Vise
ne
au
John
Suther land Mal
vern
Rid
eauc
rest
Knud
sonW
alde
n
Do
w
npatrick
Wes
t Hun
t Clu
b
Cyc
lone
Taylor
Bathgate
Que
ensb
ury
Mou
ntSh
anno
n
Ston
ewa
y
Weslock
McClellan
Portobello
Portobello
Provence
Jean
ne
d'A
rc
Orlé
ans
Sun
vie
w
Jean
ned'
Arc
Gib
bard
Lene
ster
Fairlawn
Ramse
y
Otta
wa
Riv
erPa
rkw
ay
Swa n's
Wa y
P
rest
one
Tom
pkin
s
Be
arbrook
Saunderson
BeatriceLafontaine
Bay crest
Dai
ryCe
ntru
m
Vineyard
Berr
igan
Kaku
lu
Kirkwood
UniversityBronson
Nas
kapi
Caldw
ell
Des
mon
d
Winc
hest
er
Pic kford
LongleafSi
lver
birc
h
Cree
kC
ross
ing
Varennes
Coron
ation
GoulbournForcedRd.
FlamboroughWay
AirportParkway
Joh
nston
Inno
vatio
n
Halton Terrace
Kana
ta
416
417
417
417
416
416
416
417
417
417
417
417
148
148
Terry
Fox
Stikine
Goldridge
Cresthaven
Cres
tway
Gar
den w
ay
Kn udson
Duford
She
r bou
rne
174
57
31
16
5
49
174
Mor
gans
Gra
nt
L eaco
ck
CanyonWal
k
Spratt
Mon
tcre
st
Youville
Jasm
ine
Acacia
Promenade Vanier
Den
Haa
g
Appleto n
Be aver pond
Beausolei
l
St.
Patri
ck
S
herway
Wo lfgan
g
Seyto
n
Pont Champlain Bridge
Déc
arie
Saint-Raimond
Penfield
Pal
ladi
um
Old Colony
Connaught
Roth
esay
Riv
ersto
ne
Prom
enad
eRo
ckcl
iffe
Orléans
Jean
ned'
Arc
Valin
Bayshore
CitédesJeunes
HollyAcres
Woodridg
e
Admira
l
Cro
wn h
ill
Ogilvie
He m
lock
Thor
ndale
Pickford Harness
Kitti
wak
e
Beec
hfer
nH
edge
row
Win
tergreen
GraniteRidgeFringewood
Bel
gree
n
Old
Mon
treal
Springb rook
Har
ryDo
ugla
s
Howl
ett
Mas
sey
Kimini
Old
Stra
ndhe
rd
Airp
ortP
kwy.
Ma C
allum
50
50
5
Kana
ta
Bellm
an
Library
Campus
Dow
ntow
n(s
ee in
sert
) ~ C
entr
e-vi
lle(v
oir
déta
il)
StittsvilleMain
Mer
kley
Inne
s
Prin
ce
ofWales
Mea
dowl
ands
Cent
ralP
ark
Belfast
Sprin
gridge
Anta
res
Mar
ketp
lace
Riocan
Centre
poi
nte
Str
acha
n
Roy
alYo
rk
Otta
wa
King
Fowler
McBean
Fortune
Esson
North Gower
RideauValley
Long
Island
Albe
rt
Bottriell
Shea
SheaQueenston
Lundy's
Moo
re
Pert
h
Promenade de l'aviation
Aviation Parkway
Brea
dner
Navan
St oneha
ven
Steeple
Hill
Ga
tin
ea
u
Zaidan
Palom
ino
Sheldr
ake
Bridlewood
Jock
vale
Stra
ndhe
rd
Ric
hard
son
Side
Rd.
CrystalBeach
Aquav
iew
Valin
Valin
Find
lay
Cre
ek
Kelly
Farm
Lake
poin
te
Golflin
k
s
Que
ensv
iew
Crownridge
Stee
plec
hase
WestRidge
Bla
ckle
af
Terry Fox
Am
bles
ide
Trailway
Col
onna
de
DuCa
sino
Ston
eM
eado
w
Cha
pman
Mills
Brid
gest
one
Kinburnie
Pro
m. d
esO
utao
uais
Rap
idTr
ansi
t N
etw
ork
Rés
eau
de t
rans
port
en
com
mun
rap
ide
Riv
ière
des
Ou
tao
ua
is
Ott
aw
a R
iver
R. Rideau R.Canal
R. Rideau R.
Lac
Do
wD
ow
sLa
ke
R. Rideau R.
Can
al
417
417
417
416
417
Co
nfe
der
atio
nC
on
fed
erat
ionC
arle
ton
Bas
elin
e
Fallo
wfi
eld
Bar
rhav
en C
entr
e
Iris
Qu
een
sway
Bay
sho
reEa
gle
son
Mo
od
ie
Kan
ata
No
rth
/No
rd
Terr
y Fo
x
Stit
tsvi
lle
Bayview
Westb
oroTunney's
Pasture
Domin
ion
LeBreto
n
Cam
pu
s
Mac
ken
zie
Kin
g
Lycé
e C
lau
del
Smyt
hR
iver
sid
e
Ple
asan
t P
ark
Bill
ing
s B
rid
ge
Her
on
Co
nfe
der
atio
n
Wal
kley
Sou
th K
eys
Air
po
rtA
éro
po
rt
Gre
enb
oro
Lin
coln
Fiel
ds
96
96
94
97
101
102
97
Map
no
t to
sca
le /
Car
te n
on
à l'
éch
elle
Lees
N
Hu
rdm
an
Rou
te 9
6 / C
ircu
it 96
East
boun
d on
ly
Vers
l'es
t seu
lem
ent
95
Tero
n
St. Laure
nt
Blair
Mill
enn
ium
Cyrvill
e
Jeanne d
'Arc
Montré
al
Trim
95
94
101
102
Bayview
Westb
oroTunney's
Pasture
Domin
ion
LeBreto
n
Cam
pu
s
Train
Train
Place
d'Orlé
ans
Lau
rier
Lau
rier
Lees
Hu
rdm
an
Car
ling
Car
ling
Fallo
wfi
eld
Stra
nd
her
d
Bar
rhav
en C
entr
e
Stra
nd
her
d
Do
wn
tow
n /
Cen
tre-
ville
BayBayBay
KentKentKent
BankBankBank
Metcalfe
Metcalfe
Metcalfe
Elgin
Metcalfe
Bank
Kent
Lyon
Bay
Bronson
Percy
Lau
rier
Spar
ks
Qu
een
Wel
ling
ton
Alb
ert
Slat
er
O’Connor
Leg
end
/ Lé
gen
de
Stat
ion
10
11
02
O-T
rain
O-T
rain
O-T
rain
96
97
94
95
Info
- Pa
sses
- Ti
cket
sIn
fo -
Lais
sez-
pas
ser -
bill
ets
Park
& R
ide
/ Pa
rc-o
-bu
s
Man
otic
k
Fallo
wfi
eld
Vi ll
age
PMAM
PMAM
CUMBERLA
ND
VILLA
GE
To/V
ers
Dow
nto w
n/C e
ntre
-vill
e 221
AW
221
Wilh
aven
Bric
klan
d
Cameron
Kinsella
Dunning
Que
en
Old
Mon
trea
l17
4
Look
out
Wilh
aven
Cum
berl
and
Aré
naR
.J. K
enne
dyA
rena
To/V
ers
Kars
& N
orth
Gow
er
To/V
ers
Kars
&No
rth
Gow
er
41
7
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
232
To/V
ers
Dow
ntow
n/Ce
n tre
-vill
evi
a Ca
rlsba
d Sp
rings
To/v
ers
Beav
erb r
ook
via
Russ
ell &
Dun
ning
232
Hor
izon Va
rs
Alc
ide
Buckland
Dev
ine
Frank Kenny
Rockdale
St.
Pie
rre
St.Guillaume
Var
s
231
PM
PMAM
AM
To/V
ers
Dow
ntow
n/C e
ntre
-vill
evi
a No
tre-
Dam
e-de
s -Ch
amps
To/V
ers
Sars
field
Aré
naN
avan
Are
na
231
Col
onia
l
Sm
ith
Met
eor
Nav
an
Sm
ith
Milton
Trim
Delson
Henn
Trim
Must ang
Nav
an
RivièreJockRiver
283
283
PMAM
AMPM
To/V
ers
Mun
ster
Ham
let
To/V
ers
Dow
ntow
n/Ce
ntre
-vill
e PMAM
Shea
Queenston
Lundy's
Ric
hmon
d
Eagleson
Barn
sdal
eM
oore
Perth
Fran
ktown
Strach
an
Royal
York
Ottawa
King
Fowler
Huntley
McBean
Fortune
NorthGower
Ric
hmon
d
Pro
men
ade
of R
ichm
ond
500
m1
km0
500
m1
km0
500
m1
km0
500
m1
km0
316
4
616
8
16
5
5
5
16
3
16
16
16
86
5
306
316
1418
2
1
3
3
3
330
6
8105
2 71 4 3
316
1 2 4 7 316
3162
31816
316
85
44
AM
AMAM
PM
51
51
51PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AMPM
180
88
27 40
1058
1465
18
306
306
306
306
1
5
5
530
6
1 7
5 7
215
1418
5
7
7
306
3 306
3 306
313 306
7
5 16
71
71
316
2
16
821766
18
2 316
85
85
6
6
14 316
316
316
316
316 31
6
1414
3
3
3
3
151530
6
5 1616
102
101
856
410
110
2
102
410
110
1102
101
102
102
101
103
PMAM
AM
PM
88
6
102 10
1
102 101
6
4
47
711
711
7
316
4 7 3161
LEB
RE
TO
N
CA
RLI
NG
9697
9495BA
YV
IEW
BA
YK
EN
TB
AN
KM
ET
CA
LFE
9697
101
102
9495HU
RD
MA
N
9697
101
102
9495
LEE
S
97LY
CÉ
E C
LAU
DE
L
CA
MP
US
LAU
RIE
RM
AC
KE
NZ
IEK
ING
AN
ANBANK
ALTA
VISTA
SMYTH
BRONSON
BRONSON
CARL
ING
SUNN
YSID
E
RIVE
RDAL
E
FIRS
T
THIR
D
FIFT
H
PRESTON
PRESTON
HOLM
WOO
D
GLEB
E
GLAD
STON
EGL
ADST
ONE
POW
ELL
BOOTH
MAIN
ECHO
RAYM
OND
O'CONNOR
BELL
CATH
ERIN
EOR
ANGE
VILL
E
ST.P
ATRI
CK
SOME
RSET
W.
SOME
RSET
W.
DONA
LD
KINGEDWARD
COLONEL BY
ALBE
RT
SUSSEX
SUSS
EX
QUEE
NMA
RY
RIDE
AU
MCAR
THUR
NORTHRIVER
O'CONNOR
INDU
STRI
ALCO
RONA
TION
LEES
LEES
SLAT
ER
ELGINELGIN
LAUR
IER
W.
KENTKENT
BOOTH
LISG
AR
BESS
ERER
LYONLYON
TERM
INAL
BAY
LAUR
IER
E.
CHAPELCHAPEL
MACKAY
DALY
METCALFE
QUEE
NQU
EEN
WEL
LING
TON
CRICHTON
DALHOUSIE
MURR
AY
KING EDWARD
STANLEY
JOHNBEAUSOLEIL
MACKENZIE
RANGE
WIGGINS
CARTIER
MANN
SOME
RSET
E.
HAW
THOR
NE
ISAB
ELLA
BRUY
ERE
PRET
ORIA
STRA
THCO
NA
WALLER
ROCHESTER
BOTE
LER
ST-LAURENT
SACR
É-COEU
R
EDDY
MAISONNEUVE
LAURIER
PAPINEAU
MONTCALM
DUFFER
IN
ARGY
LE
CHARLOTTE
METCALFE
OLD
ST. P
ATRI
CK
HENE
Y
MACDONALD-CARTIER
ALEXANDRA
DUPORTAGE
CHAUDIÈRE
PARKDALE
ROLLAND
CHAM
BERL
AIN
S.FLEMING
EMPRESS
VIMY
COBOURG
ALEXANDER
CLAR
ENCE
YORK
TORM
EY
WURTEMBURG
SCOT
T
WEL
LINGT
ON
SOME
RSET
W
POPL
AR
QUEEN
ELIZA
BETH
COLO
NEL
BYQU
EEN
ELIZABET
H
PROMENAD
EDE
SOU
TAOU
AIS- O
TTAW
ARI
VER
PKW
Y
COLONELBY
QUEEN ELIZABETH
VANIER PKWY
PROM. VANIER
BEEC
HWOO
D
RIVERSIDE
PRINCEOFWALES
41
7
41
7
RideauRiverRivièreRideau
LAUR
IER
Ile
Vic
tori
aIs
lan
d
Ile
Lem
ieu
xIs
lan
d
NICHOLAS
MONTRÉ
AL
Canal
Do
w's
Lak
eLa
c D
ow
RIVE
RSID
E
Gat
inea
u
Ott
awa
Do
wn
tow
n /
Cen
tre-
ville
U. S
ain
t-P
aul U
.
RC
MP
/ G
RC
Aré
na
J. P
urc
ell A
ren
a
YM
CA
McN
abb
Co
m. C
tr.
C. C
om
m. M
cNab
b
U. o
f / d
'Ott
awa
U. C
arle
ton
U.
24
Su
ssex
Rid
eau
Hal
l
San
dy
Hill
Are
na
Aré
na
Cô
te-d
e-S
able
Rid
eau
Cen
tre
Cen
tre
Rid
eau
Ott
awa
Cit
y H
all
Hô
tel d
e vi
lle d
'Ott
awa
N.A
.C.
C.N
.A.
Fore
ign
Aff
airs
Aff
aire
s ét
ran
gèr
es
Gar
ry J
. Arm
stro
ng
Ho
me
Rés
iden
ce G
arry
J. A
rmst
ron
g
Les
Terr
asse
sd
e la
Ch
aud
ière
Nat
ion
al G
alle
ryM
usé
e d
es B
eau
x-A
rts
Maj
or'
s H
ill P
ark
Par
c M
ajo
r
Par
liam
ent
Hill
Co
llin
e d
u p
arle
men
t
Byw
ard
Mar
ket
Mar
ché
By
Sup
rem
e C
ou
rtC
ou
r Sû
prè
me
Lib
rary
& A
rch
ives
Bib
lioth
èqu
e et
Arc
hiv
es
War
Mu
seu
mM
usé
e d
e la
Gu
erre
St. V
ince
nt
Ho
spit
alH
ôp
ital
St-
Vin
cen
t
Gat
inea
u C
ity
Hal
lH
ôte
l de
ville
de
Gat
inea
u
E. B
ruyè
re H
ealt
h C
entr
eC
entr
e d
e Sa
nté
E. B
ruyè
re
M. o
f Civ
iliza
tio
nM
. des
Civ
ilisa
tio
ns
M. o
f Nat
ure
M. d
e la
nat
ure
Ro
yal M
int
Mo
nn
aie
Ro
yale
Jacq
ues
-Car
tier
Par
kP
arc
Jacq
ues
-Car
tier
Pla
ce d
u P
ort
age
Tom
Bro
wn
Are
na
Aré
na
Tom
Bro
wn
Pla
nt
Rec
reat
ion
Cen
tre
Cen
tre
récr
éati
f Pla
nt
Cen
tral
Sta
tio
nSt
atio
n c
entr
ale
Co
mm
issi
on
ers
Par
kP
arc
des
Co
mm
issa
ires
Lan
sdo
wn
e P
ark
Par
c La
nsd
ow
ne
Can
ada
Po
stP
ost
es C
anad
a
Exp
erim
enta
l Far
mFe
rme
exp
érim
enta
le
Info
cen
tre
Go
od
Co
mp
anio
ns
1011
02
Alb
ert
& S
late
r
Ru
e R
ide
au
Str
ee
t
8
Wes
tbou
nd A
lber
t onl
y:Ve
rs l'
oues
t sur
Alb
ert s
eule
men
t:
8586
8795
9496
97 9596
97
20 -
84
312
422
123
123
2AM
AM
PMPM
PM
AMAM
Afte
r 1 A
M /
Aprè
s 1
h:
8815
617
217
617
818
018
226
126
226
328
3
12
34
56
714
232
316
1516
1830
631
6
Ru
e Q
ue
en
Str
ee
t3
East
/Est
1516
1822
123
1
050
0m1 k
m
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final draft- 07/29/2008
APPENDIX : RAPID AND R RAL TRANSIT NETWOR S OF O TRANSPO – 2008 SO R E:WWW.OCTRANSPO.COM
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
Draft
– 07
/29/20
08
Rapid
Tra
nsit N
etw
ork
of
OC
Tra
nspo (sourc
e:
htt
p:/
/ww
w.o
ctr
anspo.c
om
)
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
Draft
– 07
/29/20
08
Rura
l Tra
nsit N
etw
ork
of
OC
Tra
nspo (sourc
e:
htt
p:/
/ww
w.o
ctr
anspo.c
om
)
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final raft 07/29/2008
APPENDIX 5: INTERPROVINCIAL TRANSIT ROUTES OF OC TRANSPO AND STO – 2008(SOURCES : WWW.OCTRANSPO.COM AND WWW.STO.CA )
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
In
terp
rovin
cia
l tr
ansit r
oute
s o
f O
C T
ranspo (sourc
e:
htt
p:/
/ww
w.o
ctr
anspo.c
om
)
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
In
terp
rovin
cia
l tr
ansit r
oute
s o
f STO
(sourc
e:
htt
p:/
/ww
w.s
to.c
a)
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final raft 07/29/2008
APPENDIX : RAPID TRANSIT NETWOR MODELLED IN 20 1 SO R E: IT OF OTTAWA
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
Rapid
Tra
nsit N
etw
ork
in 2
031 s
cenarios (
sourc
e: C
ity o
f O
ttaw
a, w
ork
on T
ransport
ation M
aste
r Pla
n, January
2008)
T R A N S I T R E P O R T - A P P E N D I X E S
Final raft 07/29/2008
APPENDIX 7: PORTRAIT OF THE CORRIDORS IN 2005 AND 2031 DO NOTHING SCENARIOS
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
1.W
EST C
RO
SSIN
GS (
1,
2,
3 A
ND
4)
Nort
h s
ide o
f th
e w
est
cro
ssin
gs:
Legend:
Pn: variation o
f to
tal popula
tion in a
1 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he n
ort
h s
ide o
f
the p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
En: variation o
f to
tal em
plo
ym
ent
in
a 1
km
buff
er
aro
und t
he n
ort
h s
ide
of
the p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
Tsto
: num
ber
of
transit S
TO
route
s
in a
2 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he p
rofile
,
2008
Cro
ssin
g 1:
Pn
: +38
,6%
En
: +35
,3%
Ts
to: 0
Cro
ssin
g 2:
Pn
: +26
,1%
En
: +60
,1%
Ts
to: 7
P: +
41,6
%
E: +
97,3
%
Tsto
: 14
Cro
ssin
g 3:
Pn
: +37
,8%
En
: +90
,6%
Ts
to: 1
4
Cro
ssin
g 4:
Pn
: +41
,6%
En
: +97
,3%
Ts
to: 1
4
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
South
sid
e o
f th
e w
est
cro
ssin
gs:
Cro
ssin
g 1:
Ps
: +34
,1%
Es
: +64
,1%
To
c: 0
Legend:
Ps: variation o
f to
tal popula
tion in a
1 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he s
outh
sid
e o
f
the p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
Es: variation o
f to
tal em
plo
ym
ent
in
a 1
km
buff
er
aro
und t
he s
outh
sid
e
of
the p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
Tto
c: num
ber
of
transit O
C T
ranspo
route
s in a
2 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he
pro
file
, 2008
Cro
ssin
g 2
: Ps
: +34
,1%
Es
: +27
,7%
To
c: 0
Cro
ssin
g 3:
Ps
: +1,
2%
Es: +
33,2
%
Toc:
19
Cro
ssin
g 4:
Ps
: -0,
1%
Es: +
19,6
%
Toc:
31
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
2.EA
ST C
RO
SSIN
GS (
5,
6,
7,
8,
9 A
ND
10)
Nort
h s
ide o
f th
e e
ast
cro
ssin
gs:
Cro
ssin
g 5:
Pn
: +27
,9%
En
: +42
,2%
Ts
to: 2
3
Cro
ssin
g 6:
Pn
: + 1
5,4%
En
: +34
,3%
Ts
to: 7
Cro
ssin
g 7:
Pn
: + 1
0,7%
En
: +30
.3%
Ts
to: 6
Cro
ssin
g 9:
Pn
: +40
,8%
En
: +39
,3%
Ts
to: 4
Cro
ssin
g 10
: Pn
: +19
,8%
En
: 39,
2%
Tsto
: 4
Cro
ssin
g 8:
Pn
: +16
,9%
En
: +29
,9%
Ts
to: 6
Legend:
Pn: variation o
f to
tal popula
tion in a
1 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he n
ort
h s
ide o
f th
e p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
En: variation o
f to
tal em
plo
ym
ent
in a
1 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he n
ort
h s
ide o
f th
e p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
Tsto
: num
ber
of
transit S
TO
route
s in a
2 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he p
rofile
, 2008
TR
AN
SIT
RE
PO
RT
-A
PP
EN
DIX
ES
Final
raft
07/29
/2008
South
sid
e o
f th
e e
ast
cro
ssin
gs:
Legend:
Ps: variation o
f to
tal popula
tion in a
1 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he s
outh
sid
e o
f th
e p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
Es: variation o
f to
tal em
plo
ym
ent
in a
1 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he s
outh
sid
e o
f th
e p
rofile
, 2005-2
031
Tto
c: num
ber
of
transit O
C T
ranspo r
oute
s in a
2 k
m b
uff
er
aro
und t
he p
rofile
, 2008
Cro
ssin
g 5:
P:
+32
,3%
E:
+43
,3%
To
c: 1
1
Cro
ssin
g 6:
P:
- 11
,3%
E:
+18
,7%
To
c: 2
3
Cro
ssin
g 7:
P:
-10,
6%
E: +
13,3
%
Toc:
25
Cro
ssin
g 8:
P:
-1,1
%
E: +
132,
9%
Toc:
20
Cro
ssin
g 9:
P:
+14
,6%
E:
+17
8,8%
To
c: 1
0
Cro
ssin
g 10
: P:
+18
,8%
E:
+85
,8%
To
c: 1