WORKSHOP REPORT

INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION

12 – 16 MAY, 2009 PRANA DEWI, Batukaru, Tabanan BALI

INDONESIA

OBJECTIVES AND EXPECTED OUTCOMES OF THE WORKSHOP The international workshop on forest landscape restoration was conducted in Prana Dewi, Batukaru, Tabanan Bali, Indonesia from 12-16 of May 2009. The workshop was the first and marked the kick off of three series of workshops planned to be conducted in three different regions of ITTO member countries. The workshop was organised by Tropenbos International Indonesia Programme upon request from IUCN. The funding for this workshop was made possible trough a collaborative effort between ITTO and IUCN. The following specific objectives and expected outcomes were set out for the workshop:

Specific Objectives

The objectives of the workshop are to:

o Increase participant’s shared understanding of FLR principles and experiences

o Share information about the tools available to support FLR, including the ITTO Guidelines for restoration, management, and rehabilitation of degraded ad secondary tropical forests and the GPFLR online learning platform

o Demonstrate and ‘test’ the FLR approach (including making recommendations to the sites visited)

o Identify learning needs and contribute to the development of the GPFLR learning network.

o Forest landscape restoration (FLR) brings people together to identify, negotiate and implement practices that restore an agreed optimal balance of the ecological, social and economic benefits of forests and trees within a broader pattern of land uses this is, in my opinion, not an objective, but a general statement

Expected Outcomes

The results of the workshop will include:

1. An analysis of forest landscape degradation in the specific national context

2. Participant understanding of the concept of forest landscape restoration and its components

3. Identification of learning needs

4. Identification of one or more learning sites

5. A manual for Indonesia on FLR, adapted to the local conditions, to be made available in Indonesian

6. Identification of the support needed from the GFLR learning network, the ITTO and others

7. Rough plan of the future actions

SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS An important activity in planning the ITTO workshop was the selection of participants. ITTO recommended that participants come from entities/institution which are directly involved in the formulation and implementation of policies and strategies in the field of restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary tropical forests. Furthermore, ITTO recommended that NGO’s, representative of communities and private sector actors which are strongly involved in this field activity also participate. These recommendations

were complied with, and the National workshop gathered 27 participants from the National Government, Ministry of Forestry of Indonesia, Non Governmental Organization, and private sector, and Universities which directly work in forest restoration or in related activities to the workshop theme. In each case, the participants invited from the identified organizations were members of the senior or middle management team, who are involved in decision making and strategic planning. The selection of participants was also tried to be sensitive to representative of gender.

Following these recommendation, a representative selection of participants was made and is listed in the table below:

NO NAME Affiliation Gender

1 Muhamad. Firman Dirjen RLPS MOFRI Male

2 Ir Wiratno,MSC DG Forest Protection and Nature Conservation Male

3 Bpk. Teguh Rahardja Bureau of Foreign Cooperation Male 4 Prof. Afif Ruchaemi M.Agr Mulawarman University Male 5 Ben Jarvis The Nature Conservancy Male 6 Ir.Muhammad Aqla,MS Lambung Mangkurat University Male 7 M. Zubairin PT Reki Male 8 William Rombang PT Reki Male 9 Dr. Herwasono Sudjito Conservation International Male 10 Prof. Dr. Sumardi MF Faculty of Forestry UGM, Yogyakarta Male 11 Haris Surono PT. Sinar Mas Group Male 12 Eduardo Mansyur ITTO Representative Male 13 Ir. I Wayan Susi Darmawan FORDA – P3HKA Male 14 Pete Wood Samdhana Institute Male 15 Yadi Setiadi Faculty of Forestry IPB – Bogor Male 16 Terry Sunderlin CIFOR Male 17 Rukmantara RAPP – April Male 18 Ir.I Putu Karyana Bali Provincial Forest Service Male

19 Ir.Listya Kusumawardhani Director of Natural Forest Development Female

20 Agung Nugraha PT Prakarsa – Private Consultant Male 21 Petrus Gunarso Tropenbos Indonesia Male 22 Agni Klintuni IUCN Female 23 Jeffrey Sayer IUCN Male 24 Cora van Oosten Wageningen University Female 25 Setia Budi Lambung Mangkurat University Male 26 Ir. Wayan Darma Bali Provincial Frest Service Male 27 Kresno D Santosa Tropenbos Indonesia Male

STRUCTURE OF THE WORKSHOP

The workshop was scheduled for the period of 12th to 16th of May 2009, in which May 14th was dedicated for the field trip. The agenda for the workshop was done in collaboration with International Facilitator, from IUCN, Ms. Agni Klintuni and Mr. Jeffrey Sayer, Tropenbos International Indonesia Programme (TBI Indonesia) and ITTO. There were the opening and closing sessions which were well attended by the relevant Government officials.

The workshop was structured to be interactive and practical in an informal setting and all activities in the sessions were geared towards the objectives. To this end, in the plenary sessions, following presentations by the international facilitator and the national consultant, the participants were organized into working groups and performed the tasks allocated in these smaller groups. The groups would then report to Plenary on the findings of their group. This arrangement allowed for the full participations of each participant, and further accommodated extensive discussions on each area examined under the workshop theme.

The field trip was planned to give a general overview of the relevant activities that Indonesia has so far implemented in relation to the theme of the workshop.

The Agenda for the workshop is attached below:

DAY DATE/TIME ACTIVITY PERSON IN CHARGE

Day 1 Tuesday

May 12th, 2009

08.30 – 09.00 Opening session Director of Natural Forest Development and Management Provincial Forest Service

Ir. Listya Kusumawardhani MSc. I Made Gunaja

09.00 – 10.30 Government Regulation for Ecosystem Restoration Introduction to FLR Forest Landscape Restoration Restoration on the Concession

Ir. Listya Kusumawardhani MSc Jeffrey Sayer Petrus Gunarso M. Zubairin (PT. REKI)

10.30 – 11.00 Coffee Break 11.00 – 12.30 Discussion (in 4-5 groups):

Landscapes • Which/where/whose Restoration What/for whom

Petrus Gunarso

12.30 – 14.00 Lunch Break 14.00 – 15.30 Plenary Presentation Petrus Gunarso and Agni

Klintuni 15.30 – 16.30 General learning opportunities

General introduction to the GPFLR and its learning network

Cora van Oosten

16,30 – 17.00 Coffee Break 17.00 – 18.00 Share experience with FLR

Case study in Freeport and BHP Yadi Setiadi Ph.D

CI Experience in Gunung Gede Pangrango Restoration

Herwasono Sudjito

Day 2 Wednesday

May 13, 2009

08.30 – 09.30 RAPP – APRIL Rukmantara Sharing Experience from Sinar

Mas Haris Surono

09.30 – 10.30 Challenges and Opportunities of FLR in Indonesia (in 4-5 smaller groups)

Petrus Gunarso and Pete Wood

10.30 – 11.00 Coffee Break 11.00 – 12.30 Reports back to plenary and

discussion Petrus Gunarso and Pete Wood

12.30 – 14.00 Lunch Break 14.00 – 16.00 IUCN-CIFOR Guideline Jeffrey Sayer and Terry S. ITTO Guideline Eduardo Mansur Integrated Landscape Checklist Petrus Gunarso 16.00 – 16.30 Coffee Break 16.30 – 17.30 Discussion on Indonesia’s need Herwasono and Petrus

Gunarso Day 3 Thursday

May 14th, 2009

FIELD TRIP

08.30 – 09.05 ITTO Guideline on Forest Restoration

Eduardo Mansur

09.05 – 09.20 Introduction for the field trip Petrus Gunarso/Kresno Dwi Santosa

09.00 – 09.45 Presentation on the CIFOR’s work on landscape tools/network

Terry Sunderlain Phd

09.45 – 11.00 Learning in Networks Cora van Oosten 11.00 – Departing for Field work 12.30 – 13.30 Lunch 13.30 - 17.00 Mangrove Restoration Filed Work 17.00 – 19.00 Travel back to Prana Dewi 19.00 – 21.00 Informal discussion over dinner Day 4 Friday

May 15th, 2009

08.30 – 09.00 Identification of one or more learning sites, including: Which would be the criteria for learning sites to be selected? Which sites could be identified as learning sites and are interested in being part of a learning network?

09.00 – 10.30 Discussion: Who will be in charge of the local learning process, and function as focal point?

Agni Klintuni and Petrus Gunarso

10.30 – 11.00 Cofee Break 11.00 – 12.00 Follow up arrangements

Establishment of an Indonesian Core Group with one or more generally agreed learning sites

Cora van Oosten

12.00 – 13.30 Lunch Break and Prayer

13.30 – 15.00 Rough plan of agreed future actions, including for collaboration with the GPFLR and its members (ITTO, IUCN, etc.)

Jeffrey Sayer and Petrus Gunarso

15.00 – 15.30 Coffee Break 15.30 – 20.00 Closing and Farewell Dinner Petrus Gunarso 20.00 – 23.09 Drafting committee: To draft

Indonesia Guidelines for Landscape Restoration

Petrus Gunarso

FIELD TRIP TO MANGROVE AREA

The field trip which was planned for the May 14th, 2009, was designed to give the participants an overview of the relevant activities which were undertaken in Indonesia relevant to the theme of the workshop. The objective of the field visit was to give the participants a practical overview of restoration and rehabilitation works done and to interpret the Reader/Manual o FLR in the context of these areas. The areas identified for the visit was mangrove along the Ngurah Rai Highway – Denpasar, Bali

Background

As a small island, Bali is prone to abration, but thanks to the success of mangrove restoration and rehabilitation of the remaining mangrove forest in East Denpasar, along the Jalan Bypass Ngurah Rai. The mangrove area was initially covered with more than 1,700 hectare, but due to the construction of the highways toward Nusa Dua Resort and to Ngurah Rai international airport, followed by forest encroachment and conversion, the area has been redused to 1,100 hectare.

Indonesia has 9.2 million hectare of mangrove forest, and mangrove here in Denpasar is only part of this vast area. The extent of mangrove degradation is not fully known – but as a resource located close to high population, mangroves in many places in Indonesia have suffered from conversion and degradation.

The mangrove restoration was selected as an appropriate field trip destination for three reasons. First the success of mangrove restoration in Denpasar Bali has provided an understanding to people for the important role of mangrove forest for the environment and infrastructure, including the Ngurah Rai international airport. Second, the site was in the past highly degraded and even converted into unsustainable fish pond and encroached for residential. With joint effort of restoration and funded jointly between Indonesia and Japan through JICA project – the restoration of the area has successfully restored and to some extent provide better alternative livelihood to those dependent to the area. And lastly, the issue of institutional setting and governance of the area – considered very small for the given large mangrove and forest degradation n the country – has now attracted a highly intensive management intervention. There are two mangrove management agencies in Indonesia – directly responsible to the central government, one is located in Medan North Sumatera and the other located in the Denpasar Mangrove area. While at the provincial level, this same mangrove area is also managed by Grand Mangrove Park of Bali, under the authority of provincial forest service and district forest service of Denpasar.

DELIVERY OF SESSION

DAY 1

The Workshop commenced with an Opening ceremony where opening remarks were delivered by the Director of Natural Forest Development and Management , Ministry of Forestry (Ms. Listya Kusmawardhani), the Chairman of Provincial Forest Service (I Made Gunaja), the International Facilitator (Mr. Jeffrey Sayer and Ms. Agni Klintuni), ad the ITTO representative (Mr. Eduardo Mansur). The workshop was declared open by the Ministry Director, Ms. Listya Kusmawardhani.

The opening session was well attended, including members of the press, stakeholders, and representatives from associated Governmental bodies, private sector entities, community groups and NGOs.

Presentation Day 1

1. Government Regulation for Ecosystem Restoration (Ministry of Forestry -Ms. Listya Kusmawardhani)

2. Restoration of the Concession (PT. REKI - M. Zubairin)

3. Introduction to FLR (IUCN – Jeffrey Sayer)

4. Forest Landscape Restoration – Indonesia Context (TBI – Petrus Gunarso)

Results of Working Group Session

The working group discussion session in day 1 was focused in three main areas:

1. Guideline for Forest Restoration in Indonesia

- ITTO Restoration Guideline

- ITTO Biodiversity in the Production Forest

- NGO Consortium in Indonesia HCVF Toolkits

- IUCN FLR Guideline

- Spatial Plan

2. Restoration Challenges:

- Indonesia degraded forest accounted for 49 Million Hectare (MOF)

- Indonesia degraded forest and land accounted for 59 Million Hectare (MOE)

- Annual budget available for the MOF - 300,000 ha of Reforestation and Aforestation

Questions:

- What is the border of a restoration project?

- Forest Management Unit

- Landscape

- Catchments Area

- Administrative (district, provincial, national)

3. Field Trip Context and Explanation

DAY 2

1. Gedepahala Restoration Program (Conservation Indonesia – Herwasono Sudjito)

2. Biosphere Reserve inside Forest Plantation (Sinar Mas – Haris Surono)

3. Restoring Degrade Land After Oil /Gas and Mining Operation (Yadi Setiadi – IPB)

4. Private Contribution to Landscape Restoration (RAPP – Rukmantara)

5. Global Partnership on Forest Landscape Restoration (Cora van Oosten –Wageningen University)

Discussion :

Question : What the definition of “landscape” suppose to be?

We are talking in relation with the total impression of an earth region, that is:

Perception Observation of environment and living space of man Views

Talking about landscape one will concern with “a holistic system concept of interaction between biotic and abiotic components, as well as human impact upon them” (geosphere, biosphere, anthrosphere).

The definition is actually depending upon the dominant view: whether geographical, cultural, functional, aesthetic, or whether other aspect are of interest

In this case our interest is “restoration” “forest landscape restoration”

Restoration is any effort to return to past original status or to more natural condition

(using the principles of ecology)

Ecological approach is practically working with the structure, function and change

What is “landscape from the structural view?

The mosaic of smallest homogenous special units (the topes)

What is “landscape from the functional view?

Interaction between the special elements (that is flow of energy, material, organism)

What is “landscape” from change view?

Alteration in the structure and function of the ecological mosaics through time

Landscape is nearly always the result of both natural and man-induced processes during various time scale (land use is the interface of the process)

DAY 3

1. ITTO Guideline on Forest Restoration (ITTO – Eduardo Mansur) 2. Biodiversity Conservation in the Production Forests in Indonesia – Landscape

Approach in a discrete Landuse Plan and Forest Management Unit (Tropenbos – Petrus Gunarso)

3. Landscape Initiative at CIFOR (CIFOR – Terry Sunderlin) 4. IUCN Principles on FLR (IUCN - Jeffrey Sayer) 5. Visualization (IUCN - Agni K. Budihartono)

Discussion • Green means that it is discussed in previous day • Congo Basin similar to Malinau • What makes a good landscape • Presented in the last day in order not to influence • Green the principle that has been identified • Visualization – understanding values

Principles and guidelines discussed and the final draft of the 10 principles and 34 guidelines is presented in Annex cc of this report.

The participants also discussed Landscape terms as follow:

Old New

Spatial planning

Zoning

Segregation functions

Regulation

Biophysically defined

Designer landscapes

Mapping

Understanding changes

Scenarios

Multi-functionality

Social change

Problem defined

Continuous adaptation

Visualizing

DAY 4

Discussion of the Manual Identification of learning sites across Indonesia:

1. Pegunungan Meratus - SouthKalimantan - UNLAM

2. Giam Siak - Riau, Sumatera - Haris Surono

3. Harapan Forest - Jambi - PT Reki - William Rombang

4. Gede Pangrango - West Java - CI - Herwasono Soedjito

5. West KPH Bali Island - TBI and Bali PFS - Petrus Gunarso and Agung Buana

6. Bukit Suharto - East Kalimantan, - UNMUL - Afif Ruchaemi

7. Gunung Kidul - Yogyakarta, UGM - Sumardi

8. KHDTK Carita - Banten - FORDA - Wayan

9. INCO area - Soroako South East Sulawesi - IPB - Yadi Setiadi

10. Sungai Wain - Balikpapan - East Kalimantan - Syahrumsah Setia and PG

11. TN Kutai - East Kalimantan - UNMUL - Afif Ruchaemi

12. Ex Mega Rice-Cenral Kalimantan - TBI - PG

Discussion and selection of proposed sites and identification of contact person:

1. KPH Bali Barat - Agung Buana --

2. Harapan Rain Forest - William

3. Bukit Suharto - Afif

4. Soroako - INCO - Yadi Setiadi

5. Gedepahala - Herwasono

6. Gunung Kidul and Wanagama – Sumardi

Conclusion

The workshop has met the objectives, and even more than that: the workshop has increased shared understanding of FLR principles and experiences amongst participants. The tools available to support FLR from Indonesia, ITTO, and IUCN have been discussed and shared with all participants. The field trip to mangrove restoration has helped participants in understanding and assessing the FLR approach.

Presentation of landscape restoration and its specific national context has been presented by DR Petrus Gunarso of Tropenbos. Concept, principles and guidelines for Landscape Restoration has been presented by Prof. Jeff Sayer. On the final day of the workshop, the participants have identified 12 potential learning sites and proposed 6 priority sites – particularly selected based on the willingness of workshop participant in acting as contact person.

A manual titled “Guidelines for Landscape Restoration in Indonesia” has been developed in both the English and the Indonesian language.

List of Appendices:

Appendix 1. Landscape Restoration Guidelines for Indonesia

Appendix 2. Letter of interest from Bukit Suharto Learning Site from Mulawarman University

Appendix 3. Letter of interest from Wanagama – Gunung Kidul Learning Site from Gadajah Mada University.

Appendix 4. Letter of Interest from PT REKI – Jambi

Appendix 5. Letter of interest from Gede Pahala Learning Site – from Conservation International – Indonesia.

Appendix 6. Letter of interest from West Bali Learning Site – Provincial Forest Service of Bali, Indonesia

Appendix 7. Letter of interest from from APRIL

Appendix 1. Landscape Restoration Guidelines for Indonesia

Guidelines for Landscape Restoration in Indonesia National Working Group on Landscape Restoration in Indonesia Bali, 12-16 May 2009

Indonesia Landscape Restoration

Preambule

The working group adopted the following working definition of “landscape” applicable to conditions in Indonesia:

A geographical entity consisting of an interrelated land-use mosaic(s) where energy, materials, organisms and institutions combine to give ecological, social-economical and cultural benefits.

It was then agreed that the term “Forest landscape restoration” would be used to describe actions that:

Seek to alter the structure and function of the mosaic over time to optimize benefits for stakeholders.

A long term vision of landscape has to accommodate environmental values and economic efficiency together with social, culture, and spiritual values. This range of landscape features must be combined in ways that are agreed by stakeholders and that are measurable in ways that allow accountability to these stakeholders.

A landscape vision has to be defined in a clear and transparent way. It must be realistic, and based on priority setting that responds to local, regional, national and global challenges.

The following are 10 principles and 34 guidelines for landscape restoration were developed by an informal Indonesia National Working Group on Landscape Restoration in a workshop conducted in Prana Dewi, Batukaru, Bali from the 12th – 16th of May 2009. The Indonesia Working Group was established during the workshop that was supported by the Ministry of Forestry Republic of Indonesia, funded by ITTO and IUCN, and facilitated by the Tropenbos International Indonesia Programme. The workshop was an activity sponsored by and contributing to the Global Partnership for Forest Landscape Restoration.

The guidelines were inspired by existing national and international guidelines. Important sources of ideas and information were: Minister of Forestry Regulation No. P.61/Menhut-II/2008, ITTO Guidelines - Policy Development Series No. 13 on ITTO Guidelines for Restoration, Management and Rehabilitation of Degraded and Secondary Tropical Forests, and Policy Development Series No. 17 on ITTO/IUCN Guidelines for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in Tropical Timber Production Forests, and other sources.

Principle 1. The interests of all actors especially the inhabitants of the landscape must be assured GL 1. 1. The interests of stakeholders in landscape restoration must be achieved through vertical (sectoral) and horizontal (cross-sectoral) coordination. This coordination will require the establishment of formal and informal institutions at the landscape scale.

GL 1.2. Landscape restoration scenarios have to be developed with the participation of all concerned stakeholders, they must be clear and easily understood and all stakeholders must be engaged in implementing agreed measures to achieve the desired scenarios.

GL 1.3 Visualization techniques and simple simulation modeling; that have been used successfully in Indonesia, should be used to help communicate landscape concepts and understand the landscape values of different stakeholders

Principle 2. Stakeholder platforms are needed to enable governmental, private sector and civil society representatives to negotiate and take decisions at landscape scales GL 2.1. Different stakeholders must be brought together to participate in for decision making processes on landscape restoration with the objective of harmonising their different activities in the landscape through agreement on desired scenarios and commitment to achieving them.

GL 2.2. Facilitators that are trusted and acceptable to all stakeholders are needed to ensure the success of landscape restoration.

GL 2.3. Stakeholder fora may lead the process of establishing Local Forest Councils with a mandate to work at the landscape scale.

Principle 3. Manage in an adaptive experimental framework and manage for change GL 3.1. Plans and management measures for a landscpe have to be developed based on documented learning processes dealing with short-term, medium-term and long-term changes

GL 3.2. The knowledge and understanding of all stakeholders from different sectors is needed to allow for adaptive management of landscapes to address diverse needs and to help stakholders dealing with the dynamics of changes in the landscape.

GL 3.3. Learning processes need to be put in place as part of the implementation of landscape restoration so that activities can be continuously adapted to anticipate changing needs and conditions.

GL 3.4. It is difficult to predict future changes in landscapes and it is important that managers constantly monitor these changes and adapt their activities to ensure the continued supply of environmental goods and services

Principle 4. Manage the entire mosaic not just the pieces GL 4.1. Planning and priority setting for management of land use mosaics has to be aligned with District and Provincial Spatial Planning and must be based upon sound scientific approaches.

GL 4.2. Implementation of landscape restoration has to be agreed by the owners and users of all the pieces of the landscape mosaic and must be based upon a full understanding of the rights and responsibilities of each party.

GL 4.3. The livelhoods of local people and the habitats of wildlife depend upon different parts of the landscape under management by different land owners and users. A challenge for landscape restoration is to ensure that the different parts of the landscape can be managed in ways that meet the needs of people and wildlife species. This requires detailed knowledge of both local peoples’ livelihoods and of the ecosystem.

Principle 5. Ensure economic efficiency and financial viability GL 5.1. Landscape restoration requires sustained financial support and this may be provided by the National Budget, Local Budget, private, Community, and external institutions.

GL 5.2 Landscape restoration must support the economic efficiency and profitability of different land uses and contribute to the improved livelihoods of local people.

GL 5.3 Payments for environmental services such as Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) may contribute to the cost of landscape restoration and compensate local stakeholders for loss of income resulting from landscape conservation measures

Principle 6. The integrity and resilience of ecological systems within the landscape will be essential component of the landscape approach GL 6.1. Landscape restoration has to be directed to maintain local biodiversity and establish a mosaic of land uses, to protect the integrity and optimizing the environmental services provided by the landscape.

GL 6.2 Habitat corridors and strips of riparian vegetation must be maintained to enable the dispersal of biodiversity through the landscape

GL 6.3 An appropriate balance must be achieved between natural and plantation forests and other land uses to ensure a diversity of land uses to meet present and future needs of stakeholders

GL 6.4 Species rich agro-forests have a special value in Indonesia in providing goods and services for local people whilst maintaining ecological services and supporting a rich biodiversity

GL 6.5. Local knowledge is valuable in the implementation of landscape restoration and can ensure that the full diversity of landscape values are maintained or restored and that local cultural, and spiritual values persist and the beauty of the landscape is protected.

GL 6.6. Landscape restoration is an important complementary input to processes of district / or City spatial planning.

Principle 7. Environmental societal, technological and economic change will present new opportunities and challenges at landscape scales GL 7.1. The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and REDD need to be implemented in ways that maintain or restore landscape values.

GL 7.2. Landscape restoration has to anticipate and respond to the dynamic nature of the local and global economy. Economic changes will have impacts on what is possible and desirable in a landscape.

GL 7.3. Landscape restoration has to be taken into consideration in deciding on investments in infrastructure and industry.

Principle 8. The capacity of institutions operating within the landscape will need to be strengthened GL 8.1. Landscape restoration requires improvments in the quantity and quality of human resources and must be supported through training, technical assistance, focus group discussions, and broad consultations.

GL 8.2. Implementation of landscape restoration requires the establishment of working groups involving all stakeholders and these must ensure that the activities of different sectoral institutions are coordinated at a landscape scale.

Principle 9. Appropriate legal and policy frameworks must be in place to enable landscape scale interventions GL 9.1. Adjustment and establishment of laws and regulations is needed to secure rights and reduce uncertainty of stakeholders whose economic activities are influenced by the implementation of landscape restoration.

GL 9.2. Mulstistakeholder and especially multi-sectoral coordination is needed to implement the laws and regulation for landscape restoration.

GL 9.3. Multistakeholder agreement is needed in the designation of coordinators and management units for the implementation of landscape restoration.

Principle 10. Commitment to implementation and enforcement GL 10.1. Dissemination of information is needed for each step in landscape restoration to secure multistakeholder commitment.

GL 10.2. Role, rights, and responsibilities must be clear and agreed for consistent implementation of landscape restoration.

GL 10.3. Continuous monitoring and evaluation with the participation of all stakeholders is required for effective and efficient implementation of landscape restoration.

GL 10.4. To secure the success of landscape restoration, effective and consistent law enforcement is needed.

Done in Prana Dewi

At 11.09 PM on the 15th of May 2009

Signed Prof Sumardi Prof Afif Ruchaemi DR Herwasono Soedjito DR Yadi Setiadi DR Petrus Gunarso Ir Setia Budi MP Ir M. Aqla MP William Rombang MSc.

Based on discussion with the other following workshop participants: Ir. Listya Kusumawardani, M.Sc (Direktorat Jenderal BPK) Ir. Muhamad Firman, M.Forsc (Direktorat Jenderal RLPS) Ir. Wiratno, M.Sc (Direktorat Jenderal PHKA) Ir. Wayan Susi Darmawan, M.Si (P3HKA, Badan Litbang Kehutanan) Ir. Agung Nugraha, M.Si (Praktisi, MPI) Ir. Kresno Dwi Santosa, M.Si (TBI) Terry Sunderland, Ph.D (CIFOR) Ir. Harris Surono (PT. Sinar Mas Forestry) DR Rukmantara (RAPP) Zubairin (PT. Harapan Forest-REKI) Pete Wood (Samdhana) Ben Jarvis, M.Sc (TNC) Ferry Yunus (Biro-KLN) Ir. Putu Karyana (Dinas Kehutanan Propinsi Bali) Ir. Wayan Darma (Dinas Kehutanan Propinsi Bali) Jeff Sayer (IUCN) Cora Van Oosten (WURI) Agni Klintuni (IUCN) Final Edit by DR. Petrus Gunarso

Appendix 2. Letter of interest from Bukit Suharto Learning Site from Mulawarman University

Appendix 3. Letter of interest from Wanagama – Gunung Kidul Learning Site from Gadajah Mada University.

Appendix 4. Letter of Interest from PT REKI – Jambi

Appendix 5. Letter of interest from Gede Pahala Learning Site – from Conservation International – Indonesia.

Appendix 6. Letter of interest from West Bali Learning Site – Provincial Forest Service of Bali, Indonesia

Appendix 7. Letter of interest from from APRIL