International Roaming BEREC Benchmark Data Report April ... · But the Roaming Regulation allows...
Transcript of International Roaming BEREC Benchmark Data Report April ... · But the Roaming Regulation allows...
BoR (17) 102
1June 2017
International Roaming
BEREC Benchmark Data Report
April – September 2016
BoR (17) 102
2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3
2. Regulatory evolution ...................................................................................................... 4
3. Methodology for the data collection ............................................................................. 6
4. Main Findings ................................................................................................................. 9
5. Charts ............................................................................................................................ 13
5.1. Domestic services - ARRPU and consumption patterns .................................... 14
5.1.1. Average Retail Revenue per User (ARRPU) .............................................. 14
5.1.2. Consumption patterns for domestic retail services ..................................... 16
5.2. The development of Roaming Services ............................................................... 21
5.2.1. Voice roaming services .............................................................................. 21
5.2.1.1 RoW retail prices ................................................................................... 21 5.2.1.2 Wholesale prices ................................................................................... 24 5.2.1.3 Consumption patterns ........................................................................... 34
5.2.2. SMS roaming services ............................................................................... 47
5.2.2.1 RoW retail prices ................................................................................... 47 5.2.2.2 Wholesale prices ................................................................................... 49 5.2.2.3 Consumption patterns ........................................................................... 58
5.2.3. Data roaming services ............................................................................... 65
5.2.3.1 RoW retail prices ................................................................................... 65 5.2.3.2 Wholesale prices ................................................................................... 67 5.2.3.3 Consumption patterns ........................................................................... 77
5.3. Wholesale roaming (outbound): Agreements applying Article 3 of the Roaming
Regulation .............................................................................................................. 83
BoR (17) 102
3
1. Introduction
This BEREC Benchmark Report on International Roaming (the “Report”) presents the results
of the 18th round of data collection on European international roaming services undertaken
by the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC). The Report
covers the period 1 April - 30 September 2016, i.e. the 2nd and 3rd quarter 2016. The Report
also includes data from previous rounds of data collection conducted by BEREC and its
predecessor, the European Regulators Group (ERG), to provide context for the current figures.
The earliest data is from the 2nd quarter 2007, when the Roaming Regulation was about to
enter into force.
The applicable regulatory framework for this data collection is Roaming Regulation (EU) No.
531/2012, as amended by Regulation (EU) No. 2120/20151, applied in the European Union
(EU)2, which includes new requirements for the retail and wholesale regulated tariffs for voice,
SMS and data roaming. For the 18th Benchmarking exercise, significant changes were made
to meet these new requirements. This was considered necessary, as the TSM Regulation
incorporates substantial changes to the Roaming Regulation, which leads to the new roaming
regime. In addition, according to Article 19 paragraph (4) of the Roaming Regulation (EU) No.
531/2012 as amended by Regulation (EU) No. 2120/2015, BEREC is obliged to regularly
collect data from national regulatory authorities (NRAs) on the development of retail and
wholesale charges for regulated voice, SMS and data roaming services. Those data are used
to assess the competitive developments in the Union-wide roaming markets and are notified
to the Commission at least twice a year. Furthermore, there is a new requirement for BEREC
to report regularly on the evolution of pricing and consumption patterns in the Member States
for both domestic and roaming services and the evolution of actual wholesale roaming rates
for unbalanced traffic between roaming providers.
BEREC is coordinating this process of data collection by pursuing the following objectives:
simplifying the process not only for NRAs as BEREC acts as a central point for the
data collection, but also for the Commission, as the data are received from a single
source and following uniform data processing;
coordinating the procedures of individual NRAs, as the data collection exercise uses a
single and commonly agreed data collection model, and the process is synchronised
and based on the same collection periods. BEREC consults the market players and
the Commission before finalising the data collection templates;
providing, as far as possible, a common response to the different questions posed
during the collection process by operators and NRAs, as BEREC serves as the forum
where these questions are commonly debated and addressed.
1 Regulation (EU) No. 2120/2015, hereinafter ‘TSM Regulation‘, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015R2120 2 The amendments where incorporated in the EEA agreement 29 April 2016, but did not enter into
force for the EEA/EFTA countries Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland since the three countries had made reservations for approval by their respective Parliaments. However, in Norway the Electronic Communications Regulation was changed, and the amendments entered into force 1 June 2016
BoR (17) 102
4
2. Regulatory evolution
The ERG initially worked on the long-standing issue of high prices for international roaming
services. Following its creation in January 2010, BEREC took over responsibility for this work
from ERG.
The 2007 Regulation
In 2005, ERG undertook a study on international roaming that concluded that the EC
Regulatory Framework did not provide the necessary tool-kit for NRAs to tackle the problems
identified. ERG wrote to the Commission in December 2005 highlighting its concerns.
After significant debate, the first Regulation on international roaming services was published
on 29 June 2007. The primary provisions capped wholesale and retail charges for voice calls
under Eurotariff and set a number of transparency provisions to help to ensure that consumers
were well informed. The provisions of the Regulation entered into force at different times, with
retail and transparency provisions taking full effect by the end of September 2007 and
wholesale provisions calculated annually from the end of August 20073.
The 2009 amended Regulation
On 7 May 2008, the Commission launched a public consultation on the functioning of the 2007
Regulation. ERG’s views expressed in response to the consultation were substantially
reflected in the Commission’s legislative proposals,4 published on 23 September 2008, to
extend the 2007 Regulation in duration and scope.
On 22 April 2009, the European Parliament adopted Regulation (EC) No. 544/2009 at first
reading, with a view to amending Regulation (EC) No. 717/2007. Subsequently, on 8 June
2009, the Council of EU Telecoms Ministers formally adopted the new EU roaming rules
approved by the European Parliament. The definitive text of Regulation (EC) No. 544/2009
was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 29 June 20095,6.
In particular, the Regulation introduced the following measures related to price control,
applicable from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2012:
an extension of wholesale and retail price regulation for voice services, with yearly
decreases in the levels of the caps;
price regulation of SMS roaming services at both the wholesale and retail level;
price regulation of data roaming services at the wholesale level.
And from July 2010 to June 2012:
3 In Norway and Iceland the 2007 Regulation was in force from the end of 2007 to the 2nd quarter 2010. 4 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/roaming/docs/regulation/reg_en.pdf 5 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:167:0012:0023:EN:PDF 6 From the 3rd quarter 2009 to the 1st quarter 2010, Regulation 544/2009 applied in the EU while the
first Roaming Regulation (EC) No. 717/2007 remained in force in Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein, with slightly higher voice caps, no SMS caps and no wholesale data cap.
BoR (17) 102
5
retail transparency measures to protect consumers from “bill shock” when data
roaming.
The 2012 Regulation
On 29 June 2010, the Commission published an interim report7 on the functioning of the 2009
Regulation. The Commission’s Digital Agenda for Europe8 also included a target for roaming,
where ‘the difference between roaming and national tariffs should approach zero by 2015’.
In accordance with the 2009 Regulation, BEREC provided advice to the Commission on the
functioning of the Regulation and future regulatory options in its December 2010 Report9,
supplemented by its February 2011 response to the Commission’s public consultation10.
The Commission then published a full review of the functioning of the Regulation and
legislative proposals for a new Regulation in July 201111.
On 30 May 2012 the Council of the European Union approved the International Roaming
Regulation III12, which entered into force on 1 July 201213.
The Regulation introduced the following measures, applicable from 1 July 2012:
an extension of wholesale and retail price regulation for voice and SMS with yearly
decreases in the levels of the caps until 30 June 2014 with those caps to remain in
force until 30 June 2022 for wholesale services, and until 30 June 2017 for the
Eurotariffs, subject to a further review by 30 June 2016;
an extension of wholesale price regulation for data with yearly decreases in the levels
of the caps until 30 June 2014 with those caps to remain in force until 30 June 2022;
price regulation of data roaming services at the retail level with a yearly decrease in
the level of the cap until 30 June 2014 with the cap to remain in force until 30 June
2017, being subject to a further review by 30 June 2016;
the obligation for MNOs to meet all reasonable requests for wholesale roaming access,
which comprises direct wholesale roaming access and wholesale roaming resale
access under the rules set out in the Roaming Regulation. The Regulation also
included provisions on the separate sale of roaming services which entered into force
on 1 July 2014.
The 2012 Regulation as amended by Regulation (EU) No. 2120/2015
On 3 April 2014, the European Parliament (EP) took up the position, within the framework of
the procedure for the adoption of a Regulation for a European Single Market for Electronic
7 http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/roaming/docs/interim_report2010.pdf 8 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF 9 http://erg.eu.int/doc/berec/bor_10_58.pdf 10http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/roaming/docs/cons11/Berec.pdf 11http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/roaming/index_en.htm 12http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:172:0010:0035:EN:PDF 13 With regard to the EEA EFTA countries, it must be noted that the Roaming Regulation applies in
these countries as from 7 December (Norway and Liechtenstein) and 21 December (Iceland) 2012.
BoR (17) 102
6
Communications (TSM Regulation), to abolish retail roaming surcharges in order to allow
customers to “Roam Like at Home” (RLAH) with a fair use limit.
Regulation (EU) No. 2015/212014, adopted by the European Parliament on 27 October 2015
and published in the Official Journal of 26 November 2015, includes amendments to Roaming
Regulation No. 531/201215, the main one being the principle of Roam-Like-At-Home, i.e.
requiring roaming providers not to levy any surcharge in addition to the domestic retail price
on roaming customers as of 15 June 2017 (RLAH tariffs). But the Roaming Regulation allows
providers to add a surcharge for regulated roaming services in addition to the domestic price
during the transitional period (30 April until 14 June 2017). Furthermore, similar to the
provisions set out in the third Roaming Regulation, roaming providers can also offer alternative
roaming tariffs as an alternative to RLAH and RLAH+16 and customers may deliberately
choose those alternative tariffs.
The amendments to the Roaming Regulation resulted in an update of the BEREC Benchmark
Report and the current Report includes RLAH, RLAH+, fixed period tariffs and alternative
tariffs offered by operators.
3. Methodology for the data collection
Because of the broad scope and complexity of the new requirements stemming from the TSM
Regulation, new key indicators have been developed for the data collection. In addition, while
the results are derived from the same questionnaire, the methodology used for some data
from these new key indicators can differ between countries for a number of reasons,
particularly relevant are the following:
Differences in the methods used by operators to allocate volumes for the different roaming
services. For instance, complex tariff structures in which different roaming plans apply (for
example after exceeding roaming limits, the user is automatically switched to a different
roaming tariff plan) can affect the interpretation of the results since there is not an
harmonized methodology among operators for allocating the volumes between the
different types of services (RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariffs and/or alternative tariffs).
Difficulties in estimating the actual revenues for the roaming services. Most of the
operators provide domestic bundled services and it is therefore difficult i) to estimate how
much of the bundle the user used for roaming services and ii) to allocate revenues to the
domestic individual services (e.g.: fixed voice, mobile, internet, TV). Therefore, in the
report all revenues resulting from bundled services are allocated to domestic services
regardless of whether the service is provided in the domestic network or in a visited
network.
Therefore, the results presented in the Report should be read with the aforementioned caveats
in mind and taking into account the operators’ problems with data reporting. The development
of a proper methodology to present comparable characteristics of EU/EEA international
14 Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015R2120 15 Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32012R0531 16 RLAH + allows the roaming provider to apply a surcharge in addition to the domestic retail price during the transitional period (from 30 April 2016 until 14 June 2017)
BoR (17) 102
7
roaming markets is work in progress. Due to the revision of the methodology it may be
necessary to revise the current data collection and therefore this report.
The assessment of the international roaming market was based on the requirements set out
in Article 19 (4) of the Roaming Regulation. In order to assess the competitive developments
in the Union-wide roaming markets, BEREC has to regularly collect data from national
regulatory authorities on the development of retail and wholesale charges for regulated voice,
SMS and data roaming services. On the basis of the collected data, BEREC also has to report
regularly on the evolution of pricing and consumption patterns in the Member States for both
domestic and roaming services and the evolution of actual wholesale roaming rates for
unbalanced traffic between roaming providers.
While the changes to the Roaming Regulation refer to the RLAH regime, these requirements
are applicable from 17 June 2017 and the current Report includes RLAH tariffs offered by the
operators prior to the date set out in the Roaming Regulation. In this context, it is necessary
to underline that the RLAH offers may include different restrictions or ‘add-ons’. BEREC notes
that there is much variation in how such offers are provided which resulted in monitoring
general consumption patterns. A further assessment of RLAH tariffs within the Roaming
Regulation framework will be considered in the future BEREC Reports.
Legislative amendments were also made to address the transitional period from 30 April 2016
until 14 June 2017. Article 6f (2) of the Roaming Regulation allows providers to add a
surcharge for regulated roaming services in addition to the domestic price during the
transitional period (RLAH+ tariffs). Where a roaming provider applies a surcharge for the
consumption of regulated retail roaming services, the sum of the domestic retail price and any
surcharge applied must not exceed the price cap set out in Article 6e (1) (b). For calls received,
which are not charged domestically, Article 6e (1) (c) provides that any surcharge applied shall
not exceed the weighted average of the maximum mobile termination rates set out in the
Implementing Act17. For calls made, SMS sent and data used, Article 6e (1) (a) provides that
any surcharge must not exceed the wholesale caps, which are currently 5 cents per minute, 2
cents per SMS and 5 cents per MB respectively18. Due to the complexity of such tariffs and
operators reporting capabilities, the current BEREC Benchmark Report includes an
assessment of RLAH+ tariffs with respect to consumption patterns.
The Roaming Regulation allows tariff packages which provide roaming customers with a per
diem, or any other fixed periodic roaming charge (hereinafter "fixed periodic roaming tariff")
and which contain a certain volume of regulated roaming services (Article 6e (1),
subparagraph 4). Therefore, operators can offer fixed periodic roaming tariffs with a volume
allowance as an option to their customers during the transitional period in addition to the
regulated roaming tariffs. This means that these fixed periodic roaming tariffs cannot be the
only tariff option available to roaming customers. A fixed periodic roaming tariff complies with
Article 6e (1) Roaming Regulation - and should not be treated as an alternative tariff pursuant
to Article 6e (3) - on condition that the consumption of the full amount of that volume leads to
a unit price for regulated roaming calls made, calls received, SMS messages sent and data
roaming services which does not exceed the sum of the domestic retail price and the maximum
17 Pursuant to Regulation (EU) No. 531/2012 the Commission is to review the weighted average of maximum mobile termination rates across the Union annually, available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2015.331.01.0007.01.ENG 18 The prices do not include VAT.
BoR (17) 102
8
applicable surcharge as set out in 6e (1) first subparagraph. Fixed periodic roaming tariffs are
sometimes linked to other roaming tariff plans (for example after the caps of the domestic FUP
are reached, the value of the roaming price is a daily tariff). As different tariffs are applied this
results in some operators having problems to split traffic and revenues between roaming tariff
plans. Due to this fact, this Report assesses the consumption patterns related to the fixed
periodic tariffs.
BEREC also has to report about the evolution of actual wholesale roaming rates for
unbalanced traffic between roaming providers. This requirement is also reflected in the current
BEREC Benchmark Report.
Furthermore, BEREC also reports about the evolution of pricing and consumption patterns in
the Member States for domestic services. The BEREC Benchmark Report was also changed
in view of this requirement.
Over 184 providers of international roaming services provided information for this Report. This
number includes virtually all of the mobile network operators in the EU and in Norway, as well
as a significant number of MVNOs that provide EEA roaming services. BEREC estimates that
this covers around 95% of EU consumers using international roaming services today.
Considering the aforementioned difficulties in obtaining reliable data, for some indicators,
there is a limited number of countries which have opted for not supplying the data relative to
those indicators. This is not at all unusual for a comprehensive data collection of this type. In
most cases the NRA was able to work with the company to resolve or alleviate the problem.
In other cases, where system upgrades are necessary to comply with the new format of the
data collection, the operator was asked to provide the best possible estimate currently
available and to complete upgrades in time to provide high quality data for the next data
collection. Some NRAs expressed major data quality challenges at the national operators’
level as well as the use of different reporting systems by operators. In this context, the
terminology for some elements of the questionnaire will be clarified in order to allow operators
to make the necessary changes in the reporting systems19.
At the wholesale level, operators often receive discounts based on variables like volume of
traffic, calculated at the end of a 12-month period. When providing data for these reports,
operators may estimate the effect of such discounts on data for each quarter. Because the
actual discount may vary from the estimate, there may be an apparently ‘anomalous’ result for
the quarter when the discount is actually applied. This should be kept in mind when comparing
wholesale figures for different quarters in the same year.
In a few cases the number of operators changed, which may cause an apparent change in
prices between quarters. This can also lead to strong volume changes.
When wholesale prices are above the price caps, in most cases the reason is that the average
price to comply with the Regulation is the annual price and not a quarterly one, and in such
19 ANACOM took the option not to ask the operators to adapt their systems before a common set of consistent assumptions is defined to be applied in all the countries for allocating revenues to roaming services and to mobiles domestic services and to allocate volumes for the different roaming tariff types. UK were unable to provide data for some specific indicators due to the impact of the changes in the request form. The missing wholesale data will be verified during the next data collection.
BoR (17) 102
9
cases some quarters compensate for others. Another reason may also be inaccuracies in
reporting for the data collection itself.
For ease of comparison, the Euro is used throughout this Report. Within the EEA, currency
fluctuations between the Euro and other national currencies are likely to have affected the
average prices reported for EEA countries outside the Euro zone.
All retail prices included in the charts below exclude VAT. They are an average of prices paid
by postpaid and prepaid tariff plan customers. All averages are based on billed minutes of
voice calls or billed megabytes of data, unless expressly stated otherwise.
With regard to wholesale roaming resale access according to Article 3 (4) of the Roaming
Regulation, MNOs may charge fair and reasonable prices for components not covered by
para. 3. Thus prices may be higher than the price caps given in Article 7 (1). Some data also
include volumes and tariffs coming from roaming in non-EU countries in Europe. It should also
be noted that the average wholesale roaming voice tariff for agreements applying Article 3 of
the Roaming Regulation might be above the cap because the calculation is based on actual
minutes (the Regulation permits to invoice 30 seconds for calls that are shorter).
The EU Roaming Regulation also applies to the EEA EFTA States Norway, Iceland and
Liechtenstein.
In addition, Switzerland contributed to the data collections, although the 2007, 2009 and 2012
Roaming Regulation is not applicable there20.
4. Main findings
The information gathered by BEREC continues to show a good level of compliance with the
Roaming Regulation in EU Member States.
Wholesale rates
At the wholesale level, the voice, SMS and data roaming charges set between operators are
in line with the declining regulated average caps. Some countries reported average prices
slightly above the price caps.21
The applicable price caps and the related EEA average prices during the data collection period
were:
Service at wholesale level (no VAT)
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
Price Cap EEA
Average
Price
Cap
EEA
Average
Wholesale voice (€c/minute) 5 2.921 5 2.905
Wholesale SMS (€c/SMS) 2 0.919 2 0.868
Wholesale data (€c/MB) 5 0.961 5 0.954
20 Figures from Switzerland are excluded from both “EEA” and “EEA EFTA” averages. 21 The reasons for most such cases are explained in the Methodology chapter. Moreover, NRAs are monitoring compliance with the provisions of the Regulation to gather further information on possible reasons for reported prices that are higher than the caps. BEREC will keep monitoring this issue closely.
BoR (17) 102
10
Retail domestic prices (ARRPU)
BEREC has analysed the retail domestic prices and found that it is hard to disaggregate the
different mobile communications services since they are often provided as part of a bundle.
Operators are finding it difficult to organize their revenue data by individual service categories
(ISCs), such as fixed telephony, mobile telephony, fixed broadband and others. Bundles
challenge this practice as ISCs require allocating bundle revenues to their components.
Therefore, BEREC examined the alternative of presenting data on the evolution of ARRPU.
However, in the context of the BoR (16) 33 BEREC Report on the wholesale roaming market
it was emphasized that the ARRPU depends on many different parameters (volumes, handset
subsidies, sensitivity to the number of active SIM cards, etc.). In general, the ARRPU is quite
a weak index for comparing domestic price levels. Further conclusions on price levels of
mobile communications services can be made only by a thorough review of retail prices for
mobile communications services. For the calculation of ARRPU, BEREC used the data
submitted by operators22. The domestic monthly ARRPU for Q3 2016 varies considerably
between the countries, ranging from € 1.286 per month to € 32.204 per month, with a weighted
EEA average of € 8.697, see Figure 1. Disproportion between individual ARRPU´s could be
caused by different methodologies used by operators.
Wholesale rates for calls made
At the wholesale level (Figures 10 -11), the EEA average Eurotariff was 2.921 Euro cents in
Q2 2016 and 2.905 Euro cents in Q3 2016 compared to a cap of 5 Euro cents. The regulation
has led to a constant reduction in the average EEA wholesale prices for intra-EEA roaming
voice calls (Figure 12). BEREC also assessed also the prices for balanced and unbalanced
traffic (Figure 8 – 9). The EEA average wholesale price for balanced traffic was 3.214 Euro
cents during Q2 2016 and 3.130 Euro cents during Q3 2016. Meanwhile, the EEA average
payments for unbalanced traffic were at 2.748 Euro cents during Q2 2016 and 2.841 Euro
cents during Q3 2016.
Wholesale rates for SMS
At the wholesale level, the 2012 Regulation led to a reduction in the average EEA SMS price
(Figures 30 - 35) to 0.919 Euro cents in Q2 2016 and 0.868 Euro cents in Q3 2016. In
comparison, the EEA average price was 13.314 Euro cents in Q2 2009, before the 2009
Regulation came into force. The average price for the balanced traffic was 1.099 Euro cents
in Q2 2016 and 1.102 Euro cents in Q3 2016. Over the same time, the average price for the
unbalanced traffic was 0.790 Euro cents in Q2 2016 and 0.788 Euro cents in Q3 2016.
Wholesale rates for data
At the wholesale level, the average data cap of 5 Euro cents in Q2 2016 and Q3 2016 applies
in the EEA under the 2012 Regulation. The EEA average price for wholesale data (Figures 47
- 48) fell to 0.961 Euro cents per MB in Q2 2016 and 0.954 Euro cents per MB in Q3 2016,
compared to € 1.812 Euro cents and € 1.690 Euro Cents in Q2 2015 and Q3 2015. In the
22 The monthly ARRPU was calculated per country by dividing retail revenues (i.e total revenues related to mobile voice, SMS and data traffic. Any other type of revenue, such as those originating from mobile devices, subscription fees to services etc. are not included) in the respective quarters with the total number of domestic and roaming subscribers per country within the same period and dividing it by 3.
BoR (17) 102
11
context of the wholesale inbound roaming costs, the EEA average cost of handling the
balanced traffic was 1.259 Euro Cents per MB in Q2 2016 and 1.233 Euro Cents per MB in
Q3 2016, whereas the EEA average price for handling the extra traffic was € 0.869 Euro Cents
per MB in Q2 2016 and € 0.892 Euro Cents per MB in Q3 2016 (Figures 45 – 46).
Wholesale agreements (Article 3)
In the case of wholesale agreements based on Article 3 of the Roaming Regulation, only some
operators submitted these data. BEREC’s International Roaming Compliance Report23
showed that operators negotiated roaming services at the wholesale level individually and that
the provision of such services was based on commercial agreements. Some light MVNOs as
well as resellers stated that these services continued to be provided on the basis of the existing
contracts with national host MNOs.
Rest of the world (RoW) retail prices
With regard to ‘Rest of World’ retail voice roaming calls (Figures 6 - 7), the EEA average RoW
tariff for calls made was 61.149 Euro cents in Q2 2016 and 58.025 Euro cents in Q3 2016.
The EEA average prices for calls received are given in Figure 7. Receiving calls when roaming
outside the EEA area cost 35.968 Euro cents in Q2 2016 and 26.473 Euro cents in Q3 2106.
At the same time, data from the operators reveals that the average price for data consumption
outside EEA (Figure 44) cost 34.340 Euro cents per MB in Q2 2016 and 23.422 Euro cents
per MB in Q3 2016.
EEA roaming consumption patterns
In respect of EEA volumes of voice, SMS and data roaming services (Figures 21 - 22, 27 –
28, 42 – 43 and 58-59), one particular issue stands out which is the significant difference
between these services. While volumes for voice and SMS services show a minimal or small
increase from 2012 (1.5 times for calls made, 1.6 times for calls received and 0.8 times for
SMS sent comparing Q3 2015 and Q3 2012), data service volumes increased up to around
17.8 times in Q3 2016 compared to Q3 2012 corresponding quarters24.
The data shows that the consumption patterns and the used roaming tariff plans vary
significantly between Member States (Figure 17 – 19). The minutes generated under RLAH+
tariffs account for the majority of voice traffic. Nevertheless customers opted for the RLAH
tariffs and in Q3 2015, 29.00 % of minutes of calls made and 18.10 % of minutes of calls
received were generated by subscribers of RLAH tariffs (Figures 17-18 and 23 - 24). For text
messages sent while roaming within EEA countries. RLAH tariffs accounted for 33.75 % of
the total volume in Q3 2016 (Figures 38-39). There is a significantly different trend in the case
of data roaming services. In Q3 2015 around 41.92 % of data traffic was based on the RLAH
23 BEREC International Roaming Compliance Report (Regulation (EU) No 531/512 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2012 on roaming), the link: http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/reports/1482-berec-international-roaming-compliance-report-regulation-eu-no-531512-of-the-european-parliament-and-of-the-council-of-13-june-2012-on-roaming 24 It should be noted that the results displayed in the charts might take into account values from a different number of operators that submitted data in the relevant quarters. In this Report Croatia is also included which could affect total volumes as well.
BoR (17) 102
12
data tariff while roaming (Figures 54-55)25. However, these results must be analysed with
considerable caution due to the difficulties to split roaming traffic related to the tariff plans
introduced under the new roaming regime (as explained in the Methodology chapter).
The average number of roaming call minutes, SMS and data consumption are given in Figures
20, 26, 41, 57. The average EEA subscriber spent only 8.8 minutes per month calling other
mobile users in Q3 2016. The number of received call minutes for subscribers abroad
amounted to 9.5 minutes per EEA average roaming subscriber per month in Q3 2016. Data
roaming sessions ranged from 8 to 342 Megabyte per roaming subscriber per month. It should
be noted that these figures include business traffic.
25 It must be noted that not all countries provided data for prepaid or postpaid alternative tariffs and
care should be taken when comparing percentages with voice and SMS services.
BEREC CN (17) 33
13
5. Charts
BoR (17) 102
14
5.1. Domestic services - ARRPU and consumption
patterns
5.1.1. Average Retail Revenue per User (ARRPU)
BoR (17) 102
15
EEA average excludes Iceland, Portugal, UK
10
,18
6
14
,54
1
4,0
22
6,6
21
12
,15
6
8,1
85
12
,15
9
1,2
74
9,2
64
18
,01
9
1,3
12
4,7
71
10
,61
3
18
,62
2
10
,32
9
3,3
30
32
,75
2
4,0
23
23
,40
5
8,8
21
14
,49
5
13
,39
1
4,1
18
2,1
57
6,6
68
4,2
12
13
,27
9
13
,09
5
8,5
961
0,3
92
14
,40
1
4,0
72
6,6
57
12
,24
5
8,3
32
12
,36
2
1,2
86
9,3
93
17
,96
9
1,3
33
5,0
09
10
,52
0
18
,30
7
10
,57
2
3,4
85
32
,20
4
4,1
73
23
,98
2
8,9
44
16
,33
1
14
,06
7
3,9
33
2,1
67
6,6
52
3,8
73
13
,26
6
13
,62
1
8,6
97
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Euro
Figure 1: Domestic service: monthly retail revenue per subscriber (ARRPU)(prepaid+ postpaid)
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
16
5.1.2. Consumption patterns for domestic retail services
BoR (17) 102
17
EEA average excludes Iceland, UK
12
6,5
23
92
,00
2 11
2,8
98
15
9,7
19
19
2,8
76
12
5,1
20
11
6,0
96
47
,60
5
12
0,6
31
21
6,2
66
48
,79
7
11
0,8
61
15
1,8
84
18
6,0
10
16
0,7
75
20
8,2
95
61
,29
1
15
8,7
47
10
5,0
79
10
5,7
39
10
2,0
78
19
9,5
71
15
7,0
63
95
,23
8
20
2,9
15
14
1,2
42
15
3,8
31
13
8,1
21
16
6,1
49
13
4,5
01
11
8,0
17
84
,75
3
11
3,1
55
15
3,2
68
18
4,5
87
11
8,5
38
10
7,0
61
45
,82
8
11
6,9
56
20
1,9
36
47
,43
9
10
8,2
46
14
8,8
10
18
0,6
40
15
3,7
23
20
4,9
07
56
,91
2
15
4,0
69
98
,81
8
10
4,6
94
10
3,3
26
17
9,4
65
15
5,6
21
91
,97
0
19
2,7
46
13
1,2
32
14
2,9
68
13
2,4
79 1
54
,10
8
13
0,1
56
0
50
100
150
200
250
Figure 2: domestic calls madeAverage number of minutes per month per subscriber (prepaid+ postpaid)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
18
EEA average excludes Iceland, UK
36
,72
6
61
,42
8
11
5,0
19
91
,68
0
12
5,6
56
12
1,7
80
91
,72
8
41
,37
9
11
8,3
09
18
6,2
62
29
,14
6
41
,57
3
12
6,5
01
97
,53
2
10
7,4
39
21
2,1
32
54
,56
2
10
6,9
33
11
,78
5
10
0,4
11
34
,98
6
92
,16
8
99
,72
9
69
,34
5
10
8,5
82
13
7,2
31
14
5,9
06
71
,33
6
11
7,1
25
91
,93
0
34
,33
2
75
,98
9
11
5,1
65
88
,07
4
12
1,7
44
11
3,3
93
84
,35
7
40
,24
5
11
4,6
68
17
0,9
90
28
,76
0 42
,54
8
12
4,7
14
98
,75
2
10
2,9
45
20
3,1
26
51
,02
2
10
3,6
86
14
,54
7
97
,31
8
35
,08
9
85
,64
5 99
,46
5
67
,88
5
10
5,6
90 1
28
,00
4
13
6,7
63
68
,25
5
10
7,4
96
88
,40
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Figure 3: domestic calls receivedAverage number of minutes per month per subscriber (prepaid+ postpaid)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
19
EEA average excludes Iceland, Spain, UK
13
,22
3
18
1,1
26
3,6
11
45
,46
5
84
,40
2
53
,49
1
11
3,4
02
8,8
25 2
0,6
88
14
0,3
71
11
,73
7 26
,47
2
17
,91
5
59
,23
9
16
,26
6
84
,25
1
2,6
34
10
3,0
28
73
,48
5
53
,01
1
6,8
19
80
,95
7
84
,51
4
76
,54
0
59
,60
2
38
,77
9
94
,39
8
50
,18
1
50
,81
1
11
,96
3
16
2,0
38
3,4
36
44
,62
3
83
,79
9
51
,37
2
10
8,6
40
8,8
15 1
9,6
42
13
5,8
73
11
,74
5 25
,33
4
18
,42
8
56
,79
5
14
,89
3
78
,60
3
2,5
13
85
,72
0
73
,88
2
52
,01
9
8,5
48
74
,08
8
78
,46
1
75
,41
3
53
,26
4
36
,37
4
85
,03
6
47
,91
1
48
,23
5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Figure 4: domestic SMSAverage number of SMS per month per subscriber (prepaid+ postpaid)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
20
EEA average excludes Iceland, Sweden, UK
3,2
25
0,4
92
0,4
01
0,7
72
0,4
36
0,6
52
3,1
86
0,9
64
7,7
20
1,1
42
0,5
03
0,1
72
0,5
35
2,7
41
0,7
01
3,9
15
1,6
51
0,5
84
1,8
81
0,4
00
0,7
48
0,8
74
1,5
52
0,3
46
0,3
40
0,3
98
0,6
91
0,5
22 0,9
84
3,6
54
0,5
57
0,5
55 1,0
30
0,4
82
0,7
28
3,5
58
1,2
58
8,8
09
1,3
49
0,5
61
0,2
50 0,6
40
3,1
26
0,8
33
4,5
54
1,8
38
0,8
26
1,9
95
0,3
30 0
,93
8
1,0
55
1,7
95
0,4
76
0,4
11
0,4
19
0,7
73
0,6
83 1,1
53
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Figure 5: domestic data services Average consumption per subscriber per month (Gb, prepaid+ postpaid)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
21
5.2. The development of Roaming Services
5.2.1. Voice roaming services
5.2.1.1 RoW retail prices
BoR (17) 102
22
EEA average excludes Cyprus, Estonia, France, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Sweden, UK
63
,09
3
16
4,6
65
66
,20
1
63
,38
6
99
,53
3
91
,45
8 11
3,9
77
30
,34
9
10
1,2
81
64
,46
4
12
7,5
41
31
,45
1
90
,80
1
72
,70
1
44
,46
5
17
1,4
86
14
2,1
55 1
75
,49
7
61
,14
9
45
,08
0
13
5,9
57
63
,06
3
54
,69
7
10
9,4
73
84
,44
3 11
0,7
67
32
,85
9
88
,34
4
52
,23
8
13
1,3
02
46
,31
8
89
,47
4
77
,12
9
43
,95
3
16
8,6
22
13
7,5
70
29
1,2
09
58
,02
5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
euro
cen
tsFigure 6: RoW
Average retail price per minute for RoW roaming voice calls made (billed minutes, prepaid+ postpaid)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
23
EEA average excludes Cyprus, Estonia, France, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Sweden, UK
36
,91
1
77
,45
2
61
,76
9
15
,92
9
53
,33
0
79
,37
5
69
,47
9
12
,24
2
40
,54
7
47
,38
6
47
,33
3
5,7
33
49
,51
5
55
,33
8
26
,24
0
62
,96
0
16
0,8
49
13
8,2
97
35
,96
8
28
,29
3
95
,64
7
83
,50
3
14
,73
0
52
,01
5 66
,39
3
67
,47
9
7,9
35
47
,26
3
29
,45
5
49
,86
6
8,9
46
65
,32
6
57
,14
4
25
,53
0
73
,62
4
13
0,3
39
86
,07
1
26
,47
3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
euro
cen
ts
Figure 7: RoW Average retail price per minute for RoW roaming voice calls received
(billed minutes, prepaid+ postpaid)Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
24
5.2.1.2 Wholesale prices
BoR (17) 102
25
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Cyprus: statistics on revenues have been stated by the providers as received and not as billed therefore revenue received corresponding to other periods with higher rates might
be included in the data reported, Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016, Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of
operators than estimates in Figure 10 and 11,
EEA average (balanced traffic) excludes Cyprus, France, Iceland, UK
EEA average (unbalanced traffic) excludes Cyprus, France, Iceland, UK
3,1
35
3,2
95
3,3
21 4
,24
7
10
,12
6
3,6
21
3,6
71 4,4
14
4,2
68
2,9
80 3
,97
6
1,6
22
1,9
92
4,0
10
4,3
31
4,7
89
3,7
47
6,8
01
3,0
94
3,3
63
3,6
56
3,4
97
3,3
16
3,8
37
3,5
57
5,0
36
2,8
41 3,4
72
3,2
14
2,0
08
2,2
85
3,5
66
0,1
83
2,9
40
2,0
91
4,4
88
2,4
97 3
,42
5
2,6
74
3,9
02
2,8
90
3,9
90
3,5
52
2,3
54 3
,22
0
1,9
33
1,1
40
4,1
71
3,1
03
3,4
02
2,7
48
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
euro
cen
ts
Figure 8: Average wholesale price per minute for intra EEA roaming voice calls:charges for balanced and unbalanced traffic (wholesale roaming inbound)
Q2 2016
balanced traffic Q2'16 unbalanced Q2'16
BoR (17) 102
26
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Cyprus: statistics on revenues have been stated by the providers as received and not as billed therefore revenue received corresponding to other periods with higher rates might
be included in the data reported, Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 10 and 11
EEA average (balanced traffic) excludes Cyprus, France, Iceland, UK
EEA average (unbalanced traffic) excludes Cyprus, France, Iceland, Norway, UK
2,9
08
3,2
74
3,4
05
3,9
56
8,9
99
3,4
94
3,7
30
2,9
64
4,4
40
2,9
68
4,0
89
1,5
84
1,8
74
4,0
37
4,3
57
4,9
03
3,7
13 4,4
79
2,3
91 3,1
90
3,1
44
3,3
30
3,0
06
3,5
65
3,5
89
5,0
81
3,0
18
2,7
48
3,1
30
3,3
09
2,6
08 3
,57
7
0,9
07
2,1
49
10
,41
2
2,6
12 3,2
84
2,5
78
3,8
52
2,9
22
4,0
12
1,7
39
2,2
91 3,0
32
0,6
64 1
,62
5
3,6
80
2,8
77
4,9
66
2,8
41
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
euro
cen
ts
Figure 9: Average wholesale price per minute for intra EEA roaming voice calls: charges for balanced and unbalanced traffic (wholesale roaming inbound)
Q3 2016
balanced traffic Q3'16 unbalanced Q3'16
BoR (17) 102
27
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Cyprus: statistics on revenues have been stated by the providers as received and not as billed therefore revenue received corresponding to other periods with higher rates might
be included in the data reported, Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016, Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of
operators than estimates in Figure 8 and 9
EEA average (Q2 2016) excludes Cyprus, Iceland, Luxembourg
3,5
45
3,7
83
3,4
68
2,8
26
5,4
53
3,8
60
4,4
64
2,8
02
4,7
72
3,7
09
3,3
88
3,9
31
2,6
85 3
,66
7
3,8
95
4,3
72
3,9
67 4,7
11
3,8
71
5,0
34
4,0
94
4,6
61
4,3
69
2,4
19
4,6
18
4,5
61
4,7
63
3,5
17 4
,45
8
9,5
79
4,1
08
3,7
43
2,8
07
3,2
95
3,1
39
3,7
23 4,3
54
3,5
95
3,3
05
4,4
31
4,2
68
3,1
65
2,8
27 3,6
04
1,6
22
1,9
56
3,4
42 4
,32
7
3,8
16
3,8
59
2,5
34 3,2
96
3,6
56
1,7
08 2,5
32
3,8
46
3,5
57
5,0
36
2,9
23
3,2
54
10
,00
1
2,4
14
2,9
21
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
euro
cen
tsFigure 10: Total wholesale traffic (wholesale roaming inbound)
Average wholesale price per minute for intra EEA roaming voice calls Q2 2016
Q2'15 Q2'16 Price cap
BoR (17) 102
28
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Cyprus: statistics on revenues have been stated by the providers as received and not as billed therefore revenue received corresponding to other periods with higher rates might
be included in the data reported, Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 8 and 9
EEA average (Q3 2016) excludes Cyprus, Iceland
3,6
37
3,7
44
3,2
80
2,6
65
5,2
56
3,7
32
4,2
12
3,4
35
4,7
46
3,7
39
3,2
88
3,8
04
2,6
73 3
,60
4
3,3
91 4
,39
0
3,8
65 4
,73
3
3,7
56
5,0
04
3,2
96 4,0
50
3,8
22
2,0
86
4,7
56
4,6
21
4,7
79
3,6
10 4
,47
9
4,1
62
3,5
65
3,0
28
3,2
74
3,2
08
3,6
10
4,7
61
3,4
94
3,3
87 4
,30
4
4,4
40
3,1
85
2,8
20 3,4
51
1,5
84
1,9
59
3,5
28 4,3
45
4,0
14
3,8
34
4,3
95
2,3
17 3,1
17
2,9
99
1,7
00
2,1
26
3,5
70
3,5
89
5,0
81
2,9
55
3,1
61
10
,04
9
2,2
36 2,9
05
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
euro
cen
tsFigure 11: Total traffic (wholesale roaming inbound)
Average wholesale price per minute for intra EEA roaming voice calls Q3 2016
Q3'15 Q3'16 Price cap
BoR (17) 102
29
46
,18
8
39
,33
1
27
,71
5
25
,03
5
24
,91
4
24
,50
8
23
,98
8
22
,51
3
21
,56
0
22
,25
6
22
,33
7
21
,04
6
21
,15
2
19
,62
4
19
,68
1
18
,25
1
18
,24
1
16
,79
7
17
,17
3
14
,98
6
14
,86
5
12
,70
6
12
,92
8
11
,22
5
10
,33
9
8,9
76
9,2
97
6,6
93
6,3
48
4,9
80
4,7
82
3,7
15
3,7
43
3,5
65
3,6
86
3,2
14
2,9
21
2,9
05
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Q2'07
Q3'07
Q4'07
Q1'08
Q2'08
Q3'08
Q4'08
Q1'09
Q2'09
Q3'09
Q4'09
Q1'10
Q2'10
Q3'10
Q4'10
Q1'11
Q2'11
Q3'11
Q4'11
Q1'12
Q2'12
Q3'12
Q4'12
Q1'13
Q2'13
Q3'13
Q4'13
Q1'14
Q2'14
Q3'14
Q4'14
Q1'15
Q2'15
Q3 '15
Q4 '15
Q1'16
Q2'16
Q3'16
euro
cen
tsFigure 12: EEA average wholesale price per minute for wholesale roaming voice calls
wholesale voice averages Price cap
BoR (17) 102
30
16
,40
8
43
,42
1
14
,05
2
22
,08
6
43
,11
7
18
,90
9
12
,65
6
12
,53
7 19
,37
4
32
,41
2
14
,82
1
17
,96
5
14
,06
2
5,0
81
21
,36
1
26
,28
0
0,5
95
35
,57
4
86
,35
7
15
,01
3
10
,07
5
10
,91
7
9,1
36
22
,29
1
14
,59
8
31
,56
6
66
,39
9
14
,31
6
19
,10
3
2,4
42
12
,98
4
17
,51
5
45
,63
2
15
,25
3 22
,34
4
43
,26
1
17
,52
2
13
,83
4
12
,16
6 19
,07
0
32
,81
3
14
,13
5
19
,08
7
21
,91
0
5,7
67
17
,98
8 24
,07
2
0,5
57
30
,79
4
76
,88
9
14
,29
8
9,9
61
9,2
87
31
,67
4
18
,65
0
13
,74
3
29
,87
6
59
,16
5
18
,00
2
19
,24
0
2,3
24
14
,37
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
euro
cen
ts
Figure 13: Average wholesale price per minute in Q2 and Q3 2016 (prepaid+postpaid)RoW traffic
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
31
12,984
14,376
3,214 3,1302,921 2,9052,748 2,841
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
euro
cen
ts
Figure 14: EEA and RoW average wholesale price per minute
RoW traffic balanced traffic total traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
32
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number of NRAs.
For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page 6.
Italy: Operators reported that the splitting balanced/unbalanced traffic has been estimated and no accounting/certified information is available. Portugal: estimates are based on
partial information provided by two operators, Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016,
EEA excludes Czech Republic, France, Iceland, UK
70,81%
100,00%
82,38%
22,96%
41,95%
76,82%76,10%
100,00%
68,37%
32,51%
100,00%
68,28%
57,38%
99,05%
48,77%53,72%
88,55%
24,24%
53,23%
100,00%
48,84%
70,61%
97,30%
100,00%
100,00%
68,72%
69,56%
70,40%
29,19%
17,62%
77,04%
58,05%
23,18%23,90%31,63%
67,49%
31,72%
42,62%
0,95%
51,23%
46,28%
11,45%
75,76%
46,77%51,16%
29,39%
2,70%
31,28%
30,44%29,60%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 15: Wholesale roaming inboundProportion of balanced/unbalanced traffic within EEA countries
Q2 2016
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
33
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number of NRAs.
For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page 6.
Italy: Operators reported that the splitting balanced/unbalanced traffic has been estimated and no accounting/certified information is available, Portugal: estimates are based on
partial information provided by two operators
EEA excludes Czech Republic, France, Iceland, UK
70,28%
100,00%
75,22%
8,71%
47,62%
78,27%
82,00%
58,39%
20,76%
100,00%
57,40%64,98%
97,63%
55,10%59,65%
96,93%
26,12%
53,87%
95,39%
60,28%59,73%
95,21%
100,00%
100,00%
55,47%
73,06%
63,42%
29,72%24,78%
91,29%
52,38%
21,73%18,00%
41,61%
79,24%
42,60%35,02%
2,37%
44,90%40,35%
3,07%
73,88%
46,13%
4,61%
39,72%40,27%
4,79%
44,53%
26,94%
36,58%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 16:Wholesale roaming inboundProportion of balanced/unbalanced traffic within EEA countries
Q3 2016
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
34
5.2.1.3 Consumption patterns
BoR (17) 102
35
EEA average excludes Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Portugal, UK
Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data, RLAH has been combined with RLAH+
0,43%
13,40%
5,17% 6,15%
39,49%
77,14%
36,69%36,11%40,59%
10,00%
0,87%
21,53%26,23%
38,96%
13,32%
0,50%
40,23%32,34%
8,64%4,18%
25,37%24,48%
62,14%
71,03%
51,45%
77,66%
69,08%
45,06%
22,04%
80,28%
9,86%
34,32%
19,88%17,70%
30,29%
5,34%
51,12%
39,80%
62,21%44,54%
38,29%
28,15%
59,77%
44,83%37,72%
22,09%
28,11%38,20%
49,45%
36,75%
26,42%
6,65%
5,45%
16,45%26,96%
8,50%
38,47%
4,39%
9,71%
3,21%
30,02%
0,00%
50,80%
4,68%
0,45%
10,87%
7,95%
44,24%
64,65%
17,51%25,43% 24,52%15,96%
9,09%
16,70%
11,00%8,91%
37,93%
5,88%3,95%
40,29%
19,72%
8,61%
19,28%
40,81%
11,69%
59,71%
42,99%
22,67%
59,75%
0,69%8,54%
4,15%6,69%
37,66%36,85%
45,57%38,74%41,66%
16,09%22,07%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 17: Percentage of total minutes of calls made: RLAH, RLAH +, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
Q2 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
36
EEA average excludes Denmark, Finland Iceland, Portugal, UK Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data, RLAH has been combined with RLAH+
0,36%
13,12%6,00%
0,00%0,00%6,85%
44,46%
82,17%
43,03%35,99%
48,51%
8,33%
0,74%
32,00%
21,00%
44,05%
21,73%
0,55%
46,66%40,91%
10,70%6,49%
30,17%29,00%
63,20%
68,47%
70,35%82,61%
68,34%
43,33%
18,30%
87,21%
10,14%
33,74%
23,50%
26,15%
39,42%
5,68%
42,15%
60,61%
69,03%
48,19%
37,88%
29,96%
53,34%
65,44%
45,52%
34,06%
36,63%45,19%
52,19%
40,19%
26,01%
5,75%
3,23%
13,82%
28,35%
10,38%
37,23%
2,53%
8,64%
5,91%
15,65%
0,00%
55,56%
0,82%
0,66%
9,53%3,71%
36,51%
66,34%
24,11%
22,31%
26,72%
10,33%
9,82%
15,71%
10,42%12,67%
20,41%
3,57%3,32%
39,44%
12,79%
5,15%
14,59%
34,59%
9,69%
52,25%
38,02%
25,03%
38,73%
0,45%4,05%3,88%3,16%
10,45%
32,17%25,03%25,95%
37,99%
7,82%15,09%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 18: Percentage of total minutes of calls made: RLAH, RLAH +, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
Q3 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
37
24.48%, 440,91029.00%, 715,593
36.75%, 661,740
40.19%, 991,669
16.70%, 300,683
15.71%, 387,667
22.07%, 397,430
15.09%, 372,436
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
Figure 19: EEA percentage and volumes of total minutes of calls made: RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff (millions of minutes)
RLAH RLAH+ Fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
38
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
EEA average excludes Iceland, UK
8,5
29
6,7
65
13
,64
4
5,5
35
25
,26
7
7,5
17
12
,15
3
12
,77
2
10
,90
5
9,9
12
6,6
41
9,0
55
21
,01
9
5,6
29
3,5
90
7,7
00
18
,44
8
9,6
07
20
,19
1
7,0
32
11
,94
8
4,5
18
13
,23
5
13
,44
1
19
,82
0
9,4
18
9,7
66
4,9
31
19
,35
7
8,4
79
9,0
99
8,3
26
14
,24
2
5,9
12
26
,77
6
6,9
84
11
,85
6 13
,79
4
10
,41
1 12
,30
6
6,6
88
9,5
94
17
,72
2
7,5
96
4,4
88
8,5
16
18
,98
7
9,8
53
27
,42
5
7,3
35
10
,99
6
5,4
21
12
,54
3
10
,46
3
17
,61
4
10
,64
8
14
,47
7
3,6
85
19
,34
5
1,9
82
8,7
63
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Figure 20: roaming calls madeAverage number of minutes per month per roaming subscriber
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
39
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
EEA average Q2 2016 excludes, Denmark, Iceland, UK
12
4,3
70
11
5,8
98
26
9,0
10
12
2,4
50
94
,79
3
20
3,5
26
13
0,9
39
79
,98
6
16
7,2
95
18
2,7
40
14
8,9
81
14
1,4
76
30
6,3
08
13
3,2
23
18
0,5
96
13
5,7
53
17
5,9
66
12
8,6
02
15
1,2
29
11
8,6
29
12
0,6
45
31
0,0
00
11
7,7
49
47
9,8
22
20
9,1
20
33
0,8
81
11
2,1
87
10
0,2
48
11
0,8
98
87
,39
8 15
1,2
52
13
5,3
11
10
8,3
72
47
1,5
84
21
9,8
07
10
0,0
52
45
1,3
94
84
,27
5
19
0,3
39
20
4,8
84
17
8,9
64
18
2,0
50
66
8,1
68
11
2,8
38
84
,88
2
28
9,5
60
22
2,7
88 29
4,9
40
12
5,3
03
15
9,2
81
10
4,0
70
57
,15
7
28
2,9
13
38
6,1
72
63
4,0
37
26
2,3
17
54
6,0
73
12
1,1
54
14
6,6
27
21
,34
2
15
1,4
15
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Figure 21: Outgoing international roaming traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q2 2016
(Q2 2012 = 100, Croatia, Liechtenstein: Q2 2013 = 100)
Q2 '14 Q2 '15 Q2'16
BoR (17) 102
40
EEA average Q3 2016 excludes, Denmark, Iceland, UK
12
2,2
74
11
1,0
89
25
7,8
85
16
0,9
12
91
,69
0 15
9,7
10
13
2,5
13
66
,90
3
20
3,0
71
24
0,1
82
15
4,0
93
11
0,6
02
27
5,7
09
89
,84
6 17
8,8
98
13
9,5
91
14
9,4
14
14
5,1
88
16
6,2
06
97
,63
6
11
7,2
98
27
5,9
14
10
8,0
04
35
3,1
01
21
2,8
47
51
6,5
65
95
,89
8
10
2,1
41
17
3,3
73
90
,72
0
14
8,3
84
13
8,8
19
12
4,4
83
48
7,6
27
32
5,9
88
10
7,7
19
34
3,3
15
78
,62
0
22
9,2
77
26
2,2
22
17
7,0
30
16
7,9
63
43
4,2
79
99
,69
0
87
,71
5
29
5,5
33
24
5,5
35
28
4,6
70
15
4,7
86
18
1,7
40
96
,01
5
13
9,2
63
25
5,5
44
31
9,7
81
50
9,7
36
26
6,2
99
98
4,3
34
97
,02
8 16
5,3
34
35
,05
1
14
9,9
93
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1 000
Figure 22: Outgoing international roaming traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q3 2016
(Q3 2012 = 100, Croatia, Liechtenstein: Q3 2013 = 100)
Q3 '14 Q3 '15 Q3 '16
BoR (17) 102
41
EEA average excludes Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Portugal, UK
Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data, RLAH has been combined with RLAH+
0,71%
11,74%
1,40% 2,78%
40,00%
74,09%
18,03%24,70%
31,37%
11,95%
0,67%5,80%
14,26%
31,91%
10,31%
0,81%
37,88%
21,46%
46,43%39,77%
24,50%
14,99%
66,43%
74,30%
69,84%
84,95%
68,74%60,15%
24,23%
72,16%
14,28%
65,67%
37,41%
38,81%
53,16%
4,75%
75,15%
40,23%
84,32%
57,98%
44,36%
35,01%
62,12%
62,15%62,66%20,76%
17,64%32,30%
48,56%
52,32%
21,82%
4,60%
1,33%
8,89%
27,72%
6,00%
35,77%
3,73%5,91%
3,20%
16,58%
0,00%
28,49%
0,10%
0,43%
1,70%
40,47%
58,73% 6,66%12,91%
0,00%
5,91%
6,37%6,09%9,82%
11,03%9,37%
27,43%
6,16%3,54%
31,06%27,84%
7,90%10,39%
34,69%
13,24%
34,89%
66,08%
18,95%
59,34%
1,41%
8,40%4,85%5,45%
31,19%24,43%
57,78%
30,02%
21,56%20,85%22,88%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 23: Percentage of total minutes of calls received: RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariff and alternative tariff
Q2 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
42
EEA average excludes Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Portugal, UK
Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data, RLAH has been combined with RLAH+
0,70%
9,29%1,59% 3,02%
44,07%
78,90%
24,49%25,25%
36,01%
13,44%
0,74%
9,09%12,33%
34,99%
16,40%
1,16%
62,43%
25,78%
48,11%
39,44%
27,79%
18,10%
69,12%
73,50%
89,52%88,53%
67,26%60,98%
21,19%
83,62%
14,20%
60,58%
45,20%
47,77%
48,32%
7,41%
67,25%
59,29%
86,79%
57,26%
45,98%
41,50%
37,57%
85,92%
69,22%
35,70%
27,66%39,05%
53,70%
58,47%
21,00%
4,32%
0,88%8,01%
29,69%
5,72%
34,74%
2,03%
5,70%
5,24%
9,05%
0,00%
32,49%
0,50%
0,62%
1,88%
32,89%
55,79%
9,15%
12,16%
0,00%
6,48%4,01%
6,70%9,68%
9,17%12,89%
8,01%3,46%3,04%
30,29%
16,38%
4,87%9,23%
24,31%
7,17%
38,24%
59,37%
23,16%
40,09%
0,88%
5,87%4,72%1,55%
4,93%
18,62%
38,52%
17,75%17,50%11,81%13,75%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 24: Percentage of total minutes calls of received: RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariff and alternative tariff
Q3 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
43
14.99%, 314,20018.10%, 477,614
52.32%, 1096,950
58.47%, 1542,468
9.82%, 205,911
9.68%, 255,275
22.88%, 479,620
13.75%, 362,810
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
Figure 25: EEA Volumes and percentage of total minutes calls received: RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariff and alternative tariff (millions of minues)
RLAH RLAH+ Fixed periodic tariff
BoR (17) 102
44
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
EEA average excludes Iceland, UK
6,7
04
5,1
75
23
,70
2
9,2
91
22
,39
1
9,6
97
6,8
36
19
,89
9
7,6
13
6,1
80
5,6
80
9,6
88
18
,50
2
7,3
48
5,0
00
18
,60
6
14
,08
8
18
,79
4
18
,65
1
4,9
65 8
,25
2
3,2
70
29
,79
4
16
,94
8
43
,03
0
17
,96
3
9,0
34
7,4
19
14
,76
5
9,9
34
6,8
98
5,8
93
26
,26
2
10
,17
7
23
,76
1
8,4
15
6,4
57
18
,38
7
6,9
70
7,4
75
5,1
91
9,4
27
17
,19
0
7,3
23
4,8
88
18
,07
9
14
,30
1
22
,18
6
22
,87
5
5,0
28 7,2
27
2,6
82
27
,75
9
12
,96
6
39
,98
7
17
,64
3
10
,61
9
5,8
45
13
,98
5
2,1
19
9,5
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Figure 26: roaming calls receivedAverage number of minutes per month per roaming subscriber
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
45
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
EEA average excludes Denmark, Iceland, UK
11
5,0
5
12
9,8
4
19
6,3
4
13
5,4
47
10
0,4
7
16
4,5
6
10
3,4
2
91
,62 1
38
,54
17
2,8
9
16
6,0
8
11
1,0
1
21
6,7
7
94
,21
11
9,3
7
11
9,2
44
20
2,9
2
12
0,1
2
13
5,4
5
11
1,9
8
11
7,5
8
33
4,5
1
10
2,4
6
30
6,7
3
21
4,7
7
24
8,3
8
96
,43
11
2,4
2
84
,92
76
,17
15
8,0
67
13
9,9
0
10
9,5
7
25
0,3
2
23
0,8
19
10
3,7
6
34
2,0
7
89
,57
15
4,2
1
15
6,7
1
17
8,8
5
12
7,7
5
31
1,2
8
90
,15
93
,05
16
4,0
4
18
6,6
33
22
9,8
1
14
6,7
9
14
0,2
8
94
,10
57
,76
37
1,9
1
19
0,2
2
42
2,2
5
35
7,1
9
32
9,7
6
17
4,9
8
14
2,3
4
56
,33
17
2,0
97
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Figure 27: Incoming international roaming traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q2 2016
(Q2 2012 = 100, Croatia, Liechtenstein: Q2 2013 = 100)
Q2 '14 Q2 '15 Q2'16
BoR (17) 102
46
EEA average excludes Denmark, Iceland, UK
12
1,3
5
12
4,1
4 17
1,5
8
17
2,7
08
95
,53
14
2,9
5
10
0,7
3
79
,57
16
7,3
3
24
8,3
4
15
8,9
2
89
,53
16
5,9
1
73
,39 1
15
,33
12
0,6
5
18
4,7
9
13
3,6
6
14
2,5
6
89
,24 11
5,7
3
28
8,1
8
87
,75
23
9,4
2
22
9,2
9
34
7,2
6
84
,49 11
4,4
9
12
4,1
7
81
,13
14
9,1
32
14
8,3
9
11
8,8
1
27
8,4
2
33
1,9
40
10
8,3
8
28
7,1
5
78
,64
18
0,1
5 22
5,0
2
16
4,5
0
10
6,9
5
22
2,1
1
72
,55
80
,33
20
9,7
4
20
2,9
9
27
0,4
4
16
5,7
1
14
8,7
9
84
,93
95
,62
33
8,6
6
16
0,3
5
39
2,5
7
32
1,4
8
46
2,3
6
15
6,1
2
14
9,0
7
46
,18
16
4,8
59
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Figure 28: Incoming international roaming traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q3 2016
(Q3 2012 = 100, Croatia, Liechtenstein: Q3 2013 = 100)
Q3 '14 Q3 '15 Q3'16
BoR (17) 102
47
5.2.2. SMS roaming services
5.2.2.1 RoW retail prices
BoR (17) 102
48
EEA average excludes Iceland, Portugal, UK
24
,55
8
38
,72
7
19
,32
6
22
,34
6
32
,14
5
25
,97
3
21
,72
5
17
,10
7
20
,31
6
21
,37
2
43
,27
8
21
,51
0
22
,73
1
19
,15
9
17
,05
3
16
,76
8
2,2
73
13
,88
6
31
,46
6
24
,01
6
28
,05
9
26
,73
4
22
,05
9
24
,55
8
17
,90
8
58
,59
2
69
,80
9
26
,89
5
25
,71
0
22
,02
2
32
,48
9
17
,83
2
20
,22
7 26
,29
5
25
,51
9
21
,85
9
15
,33
6 19
,55
3
20
,09
7
33
,94
8
24
,68
7
19
,89
7
18
,30
1
18
,14
2
18
,07
2
1,3
60
13
,65
8
30
,67
6
23
,08
8 28
,75
4
27
,88
8
21
,00
7
22
,64
5
24
,08
2
61
,80
4
54
,95
5
25
,93
0
24
,09
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
euro
cen
ts
Figure 29: RoW Average retail price per SMS for RoW roaming SMS services (prepaid+postpaid)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
49
5.2.2.2 Wholesale prices
BoR (17) 102
50
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016, Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 32
and 33
EEA average (balanced traffic) excludes France, Iceland, Luxembourg, UK
EEA average (unbalanced traffic) France, Iceland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Norway, UK
0,8
97
0,7
81
1,1
36
1,4
67
2,8
03
1,3
42
0,9
94
1,8
56
1,4
65
0,9
60
1,6
09
1,1
73
0,6
68
1,4
63
1,4
37
1,7
09
1,3
48
0,6
15
1,2
52
1,2
17
1,0
20
0,9
50
1,0
62
1,5
38
0,9
21 1
,15
4
1,0
19
1,0
99
0,7
98
0,4
41
1,0
67
1,4
09
0,5
62
0,5
05
0,9
72 1,1
57
0,9
12
1,2
47
0,4
74
1,3
15
0,2
61
0,8
25
0,6
55
0,7
07 0
,90
0
0,7
90
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
euro
cen
ts
Figure 30: Average wholesale price per intra EEA roaming SMS charges for balanced and unbalanced traffic
Q2 2016
balanced traffic Q2'16 unbalanced traffic Q2'16
BoR (17) 102
51
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 32 and 33
EEA average (balanced traffic) excludes France, Iceland, Luxembourg, UK
EEA average (unbalanced traffic) France, Latvia, Luxembourg, Norway, UK
0,9
04
0,8
32
1,1
35
1,5
31
2,5
33
1,3
22
0,9
97
1,3
81 1,5
24
0,9
92
1,7
56
1,1
44
0,6
49
1,4
56
1,4
36
1,7
30
1,3
40
0,5
40
1,2
54
0,9
70
1,0
06
0,9
38
1,0
40
1,5
39
0,8
91 1
,11
4
0,9
97
1,1
02
0,6
64
0,4
47
1,0
61
1,4
02
0,8
90
0,7
85
0,6
48
0,9
87 1,1
47
1,0
10 1
,25
3
0,4
98
1,2
70
0,1
20
0,7
94
0,7
08
0,5
97
0,9
78
0,7
88
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
euro
cen
tsFigure 31: Average wholesale price per intra EEA roaming SMS
charges for balanced and unbalanced trafficQ3 2016
balanced traffic Q3'16 unbalanced traffic Q3'16
BoR (17) 102
52
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016,
Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 30 and 31
EEA average excludes: Iceland, Luxembourg
1,1
83
1,0
45
1,1
80
0,7
41
1,8
45
1,6
43
1,3
86
1,4
18 1
,81
9
1,2
89
1,1
71
1,2
65
1,3
39
1,4
97
1,3
97 1
,78
9
1,0
70
1,8
28
1,8
13
1,4
14
1,5
25
1,3
99
1,1
27
1,6
19
1,7
10
1,5
54
1,1
93 1
,63
5
2,6
11
1,1
30
1,2
75
0,8
64
0,7
14 1
,09
5 1,4
30
1,6
15
1,3
42
0,9
06
1,0
94 1
,46
5
0,8
03
0,7
74 1,1
05
1,1
71
0,8
57 1
,27
4
1,4
37
1,4
25
1,2
74
0,5
08
1,2
93
1,0
50
0,5
60 0,8
88
1,0
50
1,5
38
0,9
21
0,8
75
0,8
92
5,2
82
0,8
68
0,9
19
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
euro
cen
tsFigure 32: Average wholesale price per intra-EEA roaming SMS (Total traffic) in Q2 2016
Q2 2015 Q2 2016 price cap
BoR (17) 102
53
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 30 and 31
EEA average excludes: Iceland, Luxembourg
1,1
61
1,0
59
1,1
25
0,8
54
1,8
03
1,6
19
1,3
69
1,3
19 1
,75
6
1,2
91
1,1
31 1,4
16
1,3
12
1,3
22
1,2
51
1,7
56
1,5
17 1,8
05
1,8
08
1,3
77
1,3
77
1,4
83
0,7
82
1,5
97
1,6
85
1,4
92
1,1
67
1,6
24
1,2
16
0,8
23
0,6
34 1
,07
3 1,4
18
1,6
28
1,3
22
0,9
43
1,0
57
1,5
24
0,7
07
0,8
18 1,1
07
1,0
95
0,8
44 1
,25
5
1,4
36
1,5
11
1,2
80
0,5
09
1,2
63
0,7
14
0,6
07
0,6
25 1
,02
6
1,5
39
0,8
91
0,7
61
0,9
14
5,1
60
0,7
88
0,8
68
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
euro
cen
tsFigure 33: Average wholesale price per intra-EEA roaming SMS (Total traffic) in Q3 2016
Q3 2015 Q3 2016 price cap
BoR (17) 102
54
1,099 1,102
0,919
0,868
0,790 0,788
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
euro
cen
tsFigure 34: EEA average wholesale price per SMS (balanced, unbalanced, total trafiic)
balanced traffic total traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
55
16
,02
8
16
,50
9
16
,67
1
15
,64
2
15
,02
9
15
,08
5
14
,67
2
13
,61
7
13
,31
4
4,2
73
4,0
77
3,9
93
3,7
75
3,7
92
3,7
81
3,7
73
3,7
33
3,7
43
3,6
74
3,5
13
3,4
67
3,0
17
3,0
07
2,5
26
2,3
38
1,8
88
1,9
41
1,6
80
1,6
39
1,5
54
1,5
58
1,3
42
1,2
75
1,2
16
1,2
66
1,0
92
0,9
19
0,8
68
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Q2
20
07
Q3
20
07
Q4
20
07
Q1
20
08
Q2
20
08
Q3
20
08
Q4
20
08
Q1
20
09
Q2
20
09
Q3
20
09
Q4
20
09
Q1
20
10
Q2
20
10
Q3
20
10
Q4
20
10
Q1
20
11
Q2
20
11
Q3
20
11
Q4
20
11
Q1
20
12
Q2
20
12
Q3
20
12
Q4
20
12
Q1
20
13
Q2
20
13
Q3
20
13
Q4
20
13
Q1
20
14
Q2
20
14
Q3
20
14
Q4
20
14
Q1
20
15
Q2
20
15
Q3
20
15
Q4
20
15
Q1
20
16
Q2
20
16
Q3
20
16
eu
ro c
en
ts
Figure 35: Average wholesale price per intra-EEA roaming SMS (Q2 2007 - Q1 2016 - charges to non groups only)
wholesale SMS Price cap
BoR (17) 102
56
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number of NRAs.
For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page 6.
Italy: Operators reported that the splitting balanced/unbalanced traffic has been estimated and no accounting/certified information is available, Norway: the Q2’16 value is based
on data from June 2016, Portugal: estimates are based on partial information provided by two operators
EEA excludes Czech Republic, France, UK
66,13%
80,27%
39,94%36,14%
46,97%
81,98%
58,73%
100,00%
52,18%
20,99%
99,85%
85,13%
38,10%
100,00%
64,27%
26,43%
67,74%
24,32%
34,78%
86,27%
39,37%
75,77%
96,99%
100,00%
100,00%
37,72%
51,62%52,98%
33,87%
19,73%
60,06%63,86%
53,03%
18,02%
41,27%47,82%
79,01%
0,15%
14,87%
61,90%
35,73%
73,57%
32,26%
75,68%
65,22%
13,73%
60,63%
24,23%
3,01%
62,28%48,38%
47,02%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 36: Proportion of balanced/unbalanced traffic within EEA countriesWholesale roaming inbound
Q2 2016
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
57
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number of NRAs.
For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page 6.
Italy: Operators reported that the splitting balanced/unbalanced traffic has been estimated and no accounting/certified information is available, Portugal: estimates are based on
partial information provided by two operators
EEA excludes Czech Republic, France, UK
66,38%
48,56%
16,50%12,20%
44,88%
74,74%
55,74%
100,00%
59,13%
15,58%
90,02%
75,16%
34,67%
100,00%
69,57%
30,89%
85,55%
26,82%
40,92%
73,55%
54,94%
29,85%
95,73%
100,00%
100,00%
31,72%
54,67%
44,70%
33,62%
51,44%
83,50%87,80%
55,12%
25,26%
44,26% 40,87%
84,42%
9,98%
24,84%
65,33%
30,43%
69,11%
14,45%
73,18%
59,08%
26,45%
45,06%
70,15%
4,27%
68,28%
45,33%
55,30%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 37:Proportion of balanced/unbalanced traffic within EEA countriesWholesale roaming inbound
Q3 2016
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
58
5.2.2.3 Consumption patterns
BoR (17) 102
59
EEA average excludes Denmark, Iceland, Portugal, UK
Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data
0,17%7,09%
2,11% 1,48%
26,33%
83,98%
6,45%
21,75%14,05%14,89%
1,49%4,47%12,27%
31,37%
8,46%
30,06%
21,03%
7,83%9,87%17,37%17,10%
27,51%
84,10%67,56%
59,86%
97,44%
69,91%65,34%20,20%
60,02%
12,46%
69,44%
49,35%64,94%55,56%
22,07%
67,99%
25,74%
76,05%
58,69%
53,07%
43,97%
78,97%
65,18%
54,97%36,74%
60,62%
62,17%
73,72%49,68%
6,01%19,25%
1,21%
0,15%
30,09%
5,30%53,47%
3,30%
9,14%
4,30%
8,23%
0,12%
42,51%
4,07%
2,62%
9,61%3,31%
30,52%
15,44%
2,34%23,05%
30,79%
5,10%
5,39%
3,95%
9,04%
9,71%6,10%
36,82%
2,41%
27,89%
39,98%
0,26%
14,97%
24,59%
12,78%
29,43%33,93%
23,47%
71,64%
2,08%6,63%7,95%10,53%
32,48%
21,98%24,64%24,42%
15,07%
5,23%
13,77%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 38: Percentage of EEA roaming SMS: RLAH, RLAH +, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
Q2 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
60
EEA average excludes Denmark, Iceland, Portugal, UK Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data
0,16%
14,10%
2,64% 1,39%
27,81%
86,07%
8,47%
21,87%17,58%15,65%
1,08%6,37%
12,08%
37,69%
13,73%
2,20%
27,78% 25,44%
7,46%13,58%
21,21%
33,75%
87,09%61,30%81,50%
98,50%97,07%
65,55%16,82%
77,93%
10,77%
71,30%
52,87%
71,13%
50,47%
30,31%
62,87%
26,23%
78,33%
57,55%
54,71%
65,84%
72,22%
90,51%
56,20%
58,54%
77,43%69,33%
75,39%51,35%
8,14%
16,88%0,92%
0,12%2,93%
4,47%55,37%
2,99%
9,08%
6,80%
5,20%
0,10%
43,34%
0,64%
2,87%
8,13%1,77%
24,02%22,64%
3,23%
20,05%
5,26%4,40%
3,40%
7,46%
4,61%7,72%14,95%
1,37%
28,59%22,07%
0,17%
11,15%18,45%
6,08%
33,78%
25,26%30,12%
70,89%
1,46%2,99%7,54%9,32% 6,26%
23,75%16,02%
9,85%12,69%7,44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 39: Percentage of EEA roaming SMS: RLAH, RLAH +, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
Q3 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
61
27.51%, 244,02433.75%, 481,637
49.68%, 440,688
51.35%, 732,688
9.04%, 80,179
7.46%, 106,435
13.77%, 122,1277.44%, 106,189
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
Figure 40: EEA percentage of SMS sent: RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
(millions of minutes)
RLAH RLAH+ Fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
62
EEA average excludes Iceland, UK
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
2,6
29
7,6
76
1,6
80
4,2
49
23
,67
7
5,9
57
5,7
25
4,9
71
3,7
31
11
,17
4
0,8
76 2
,15
2
3,9
04
4,8
20
1,4
41
5,7
81
1,9
90
8,5
34
11
,45
1
4,4
87
3,7
87
2,9
35
9,0
22
4,1
05 5
,48
7
6,4
13
4,2
93
0,4
61
10
,38
7
4,3
57
3,1
90
12
,39
0
1,4
87
4,2
28
18
,56
8
6,1
81
8,3
43
4,8
51
3,4
99
17
,18
4
0,9
69 1,9
28
3,9
23 5,1
53
1,8
84
5,5
66
1,9
88
8,2
42
16
,61
8
5,3
14
3,4
03
3,8
18
8,7
44
3,6
82 5
,05
9
5,2
40 6
,89
8
0,4
03
11
,05
1
4,5
21
5,2
63
0
5
10
15
20
25
Figure 41: SMSAverage number of SMS per month per roaming subscriber
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
63
EEA average excludes Denmark, Iceland, UK
11
2,8
6
12
1,8
0
86
,19
10
0,3
64
87
,48
93
,97 11
2,6
4
11
4,6
1
93
,45
18
6,3
9
77
,61
65
,28 8
6,5
7
72
,52
62
,13
15
1,6
36
13
9,2
8
10
6,2
4
95
,11
56
,20
14
3,1
8
12
2,2
3
77
,56
13
2,2
2
14
2,7
8
19
1,7
3
45
,08
88
,63
70
,95
61
,10
98
,10
8
90
,69
12
6,2
8
71
,07
11
9,0
53
81
,86
11
0,2
7
95
,55
83
,20
19
0,0
8
38
,07
63
,94
10
6,8
8
68
,33
26
,47
10
8,0
8
56
,58
5
13
4,7
3
93
,50
78
,71
49
,54
56
,76
11
2,1
4
89
,18
14
1,2
6
20
7,3
8
16
7,2
7
29
,77
87
,75
51
,85 7
5,0
49
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Figure 42: Retail SMS traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q2 2016
(Q2 2012 = 100, Croatia Q2'14 = 100, Liechtenstein: Q2'13 = 100)
Q2 '14 Q2 '15 Q2 '16
BoR (17) 102
64
EEA average excludes Denmark, Iceland, UK
10
1,5
8
10
4,3
9
87
,89 10
3,6
66
76
,38 96
,52
94
,89
82
,77 1
03
,08
23
2,7
3
73
,85
53
,78 72
,63
69
,58
58
,39
17
6,6
8
12
5,4
8
10
7,9
5
83
,65
51
,90
11
7,8
6
12
4,5
1
64
,49
10
4,1
3
15
0,3
0
29
4,5
0
41
,51
89
,58
32
,76 5
6,6
8
96
,61
5
79
,83
13
6,6
5
75
,75
12
4,5
15
57
,45
11
9,6
9
69
,52 9
1,0
5
24
4,7
7
35
,77 53
,95
95
,16
62
,37
27
,96
12
9,2
6
62
,58
12
6,6
5
10
0,9
4
73
,99
34
,41
10
6,5
3
10
8,6
4
73
,78
12
1,1
3
15
5,5
2
29
6,3
6
30
,18
88
,75
50
,98
77
,13
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Figure 43: Retail SMS traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q3 2016
(Q3 2012 = 100, Croatia Q3'13 = 100)
Q3 '14 Q3 '15 Q3 '16
BoR (17) 102
65
5.2.3. Data roaming services
5.2.3.1 RoW retail prices
BoR (17) 102
66
EEA average excludes Iceland, Portugal, Spain, Liechtenstein, UK
12
1,0
05
12
4,7
25
16
,52
0 72
,67
8
3,9
35
69
,32
4
24
,14
0
43
,35
5
81
,16
4
45
,73
9
23
,36
8
21
,47
6
60
,85
6
36
,23
7
11
,56
5
79
,58
4
23
2,0
92
13
2,4
22
96
,56
9
48
,56
8
37
,86
1
59
6,1
11
31
,44
0
37
,49
8
17
2,0
56
23
,63
6
36
,38
8
34
,34
0
44
,81
6
63
,50
2
30
,32
6
54
,65
0
3,8
86
64
,98
8
13
,50
6
34
,39
7
69
,01
4
41
,30
8
13
,43
0
21
,11
5
43
,39
2
28
,12
1
8,0
71
87
,84
0
18
2,8
66
82
,11
3
82
,80
2
37
,88
2
30
,82
0
57
8,1
41
32
,07
0
37
,18
1
66
,34
6
15
,00
1
11
,00
8
23
,42
2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
euro
cen
tsFigure 44: RoW
Average retail data price per Mb for RoW roaming data services in Q2 and Q3 2016 (prepaid +postpaid)
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
67
5.2.3.2 Wholesale prices
BoR (17) 102
68
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016, Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 47
and 48
EEA average (balanced traffic) excludes Belgium, France, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden, UK
EEA average (unbalanced traffic) Belgium, France, Iceland, Luxembourg, Norway, UK
0,7
25
1,3
67
1,5
80
4,6
72
2,7
66
1,1
74
1,7
90 2
,09
4
0,8
96
2,2
71
1,4
45
0,6
24
1,2
62 1
,58
5
1,5
32
1,5
76
1,3
55
1,4
77 1
,77
5
1,2
32
1,0
43 1
,38
0
2,1
55
2,9
44
0,9
76 1,2
59
0,3
92
0,5
24
1,4
70
2,2
05
1,0
39
0,1
06
1,9
15
0,9
57
1,0
00
0,5
16
1,9
31
2,6
40
2,0
32
1,1
24
1,2
31
1,7
00
0,9
22
0,4
83
0,6
17
2,2
75
0,8
69
0
1
2
3
4
5
euro
cen
ts
Figure 45: Average wholesale data price per Mb in Q2 2016 (prepaid+postpaid)balanced traffic and unbalanced traffic
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
69
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 47 and 48
EEA average (balanced traffic) excludes Belgium, France, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden, UK
EEA average (unbalanced traffic) Belgium, France, Iceland, Luxembourg, Norway, UK
0,6
77
1,3
91 1,6
62
4,3
14
2,5
32
1,1
75
1,7
29 2
,02
3
0,9
03
2,8
61
1,2
36
0,6
04
1,2
10
1,0
87
1,5
71
1,4
95
1,5
03
1,4
42
1,5
47
1,1
80
1,0
15 1,2
43
2,3
51
3,2
81
0,9
55 1,2
33
0,7
63
0,8
20 1
,15
3
2,6
64
1,0
62
0,1
55
2,2
71
0,9
25
0,9
82
0,5
84
1,2
82
2,9
44
2,0
69
1,0
41
1,1
14
1,9
26
0,8
32
1,7
04
0,6
67
2,5
51
0,8
92
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
euro
cen
ts
Figure 46: Average wholesale data price per Mb in Q3 2016 (prepaid+postpaid)balanced and unbalanced traffic
balanced unbalanced
BoR (17) 102
70
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016,
Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 45 and 46
EEA average (Q2 2016) excludes Belgium, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden, UK
1,3
29
1,6
41
1,6
26
1,6
58
4,2
43
3,2
94
2,4
69 3,1
81
3,1
04
1,8
99
1,7
00
1,6
62
1,8
35
2,1
47
1,4
37
2,9
82
2,2
78 3
,36
5
2,0
36
4,5
93
2,2
49
1,9
01
1,6
01
1,2
88
2,7
16 3,5
71
2,5
00
1,5
41
2,8
40
4,7
43
2,1
26
1,8
12
0,5
27
1,1
22
1,4
91
2,6
96
1,0
50
0,4
76
1,8
08
2,0
94
1,3
77
0,9
18
1,2
43
1,4
07
0,7
59
0,4
42
1,8
01
1,7
19
1,8
03
1,1
67
1,3
95
1,7
75
1,2
69
0,8
72
1,3
18 2,1
55 2,9
44
0,8
26
4,1
38
0,9
61
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
euro
cen
ts
Figure 47: Average wholesale data price per Mb in Q2 2016 (prepaid+postpaid)Total traffic
Q2 2015 Q2 2016 price cap
BoR (17) 102
71
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Ireland, Italy, Portugal: estimates are based on data from different number of operators than estimates in Figure 45 and 46
EEA average (Q2 2016) excludes Belgium, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden, UK
1,3
14
1,5
76
1,4
17
1,5
53
3,8
34
3,1
64
2,2
36 3,0
84
2,9
12
1,7
75
1,6
76
1,6
16
1,7
47
1,8
21
1,4
17
3,0
58
2,4
66 3,2
85
1,8
28
4,4
18
2,1
81
1,3
57
1,7
49
1,0
28
2,8
17 3,5
27
2,4
22
1,5
32
3,0
03
2,1
89
1,6
90
0,7
08
0,9
96
1,1
89
2,9
89
2,3
88
0,5
68
1,7
89
2,0
23
1,3
07
0,9
14
1,2
19
1,1
93
0,6
50
0,5
06 1,2
03
1,7
82
1,6
41
1,1
12
1,3
39
1,1
52
1,2
27
0,6
69
1,2
68 2
,35
1 3,2
81
0,8
13
4,2
43
0,9
54
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
euro
cen
tsFigure 48: Average wholesale data price per Mb in Q3 2016 (prepaid+postpaid)
Total traffic
Q3 2015 Q3 2016 price cap
BoR (17) 102
72
21
1,3
37
18
9,7
78
11
9,7
61
59
,57
5
56
,17
2
44
,90
2
36
,35
8
35
,39
6
33
,29
2
29
,24
9
26
,72
2
21
,32
5
20
,36
2
16
,22
8
13
,75
6
7,9
44
7,5
75
6,9
28
8,0
99
7,5
53
6,1
17
4,1
89
3,7
24
2,6
55
2,5
79
1,8
73
1,8
12
1,6
90
1,7
26
1,3
95
0,9
61
0,9
54
0
50
100
150
200
euro
cen
tsFigure 49: EEA average: average wholesale data price per Mb (prepaid+postpaid)
Wholesale roaming (inbound) price cap
BoR (17) 102
73
EEA average excludes Belgium, Cyprus, Sweden, Luxembourg, UK
6,0
99
3,7
20
6,1
57
11
,72
1
4,6
10
3,3
01
10
,57
5
4,5
45
2,2
28
5,9
30
1,5
21
2,3
00
0,9
37
5,7
66
1,0
69
5,2
01
9,6
01
2,3
08
2,6
16 4,3
56
3,5
23
2,9
31
14
,55
3
33
,18
6
2,2
86
2,4
68
3,2
90
2,6
36
1,8
44
13
,01
3
4,2
08
2,8
26
5,1
81
4,0
12
1,9
98
3,1
44
1,7
71
1,6
59
4,2
73
3,7
61
1,0
13 3
,07
2
8,0
71
1,8
37
1,5
54
4,9
41
2,9
68
2,3
87
13
,37
7
19
,06
3
1,8
49 3,1
80
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
euro
cen
tsFigure 50: Average wholesale data price per Mb in Q2 and Q3 2016 (prepaid+postpaid)
RoW traffic
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
74
2,468
3,180
1,259 1,233
0,961 0,9540,869 0,892
0
1
2
3
4
5
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
euro
cen
tsFigure 51: EEA average wholesale data price per Mb in Q2 and Q3 2016
(prepaid+postpaid) (balanced, unbalanced, total traffic, RoW traffic
RoW traffic balanced traffic Total traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
75
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Italy: Operators reported that the splitting balanced/unbalanced traffic has been estimated and no accounting/certified information is available, Norway: the Q2’16 value is based
on data from June 2016, Portugal: estimates are based on partial information provided by two operators
EEA average excludes Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Sweden, UK
40,42%
100,00%
70,93%
18,89%19,90%
91,83%
34,63%
85,48%
100,00%
63,85%
19,18%
90,04%92,39%
26,49%
37,46%
83,10%
50,28%
18,33%
66,83%
100,00%92,02%
42,03%
93,07%100,00%
100,00%
58,19%54,52%
59,58%
29,07%
81,11%80,10%
8,17%
65,37%
14,52%
36,15%
80,82%
9,96% 7,61%
73,51%
62,54%
16,90%
49,72%
81,67%
33,17%
7,98%
57,97%
6,93%
41,81%45,48%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 52: Proportion of balanced/unbalanced traffic within EEA countriesWholesale roaming inbound
Q2 2016
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
76
While the measure of balanced/unbalanced traffic should include volumes and revenues from all operators per country, such information is currently available for a limited number
of NRAs. For some countries, even if a data set is available, not all operators are included. Please also read carefully Chapter on the methodology for the data collection on page
6.
Italy: Operators reported that the splitting balanced/unbalanced traffic has been estimated and no accounting/certified information is available, Norway: the Q2’16 value is based
on data from June 2016, Portugal: estimates are based on partial information provided by two operators
EEA average excludes Belgium, Finland, France, Luxembourg, Sweden, UK
64,06%
30,86%
7,07%
19,69%
90,21%
40,53%
88,82%
47,22%
12,62%
85,99%88,66%
34,60%40,33%
84,67%
74,50%
15,42%
68,60%74,49%
93,66%
15,22%
94,66%100,00%
100,00%
50,80%47,01%
35,94%
69,14%
92,93%
80,31%
9,79%
59,47%
11,18%
52,78%
87,38%
14,01%11,34%
65,40%59,67%
15,33%
25,50%
84,58%
31,40%25,51%
6,34%
84,78%
5,34%
49,20%52,99%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 53:Proportion of balanced/unbalanced traffic within EEA countriesWholesale roaming inbound
Q3 2016
balanced traffic unbalanced traffic
BoR (17) 102
77
5.2.3.3 Consumption patterns
BoR (17) 102
78
EEA average excludes Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Spain, Portugal UK
Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data, RLAH has been combined with RLAH+
0,01%
12,47%
4,04%
60,56%
85,75%
48,87%44,19%45,45%
0,43%0,06%3,13%
88,37%
54,67%
11,98%
52,96%
44,38%
0,31%
84,48%
59,03%
38,31%
28,09%
42,85%
38,68%
35,14%
0,38%
20,82%
33,14%
87,53%
5,24%
8,96%11,46%9,84%
65,71%
4,92%
68,70%
88,36%
5,12%
25,50%
22,50%
18,75%
36,35%
53,18%
19,91%
13,51%
19,82%
8,20%
16,37%
15,72%
63,16%
34,08%
8,25%
62,82%
99,62%
2,42%
6,30%5,43%
28,46%
6,72%
39,67%
0,07%
57,44%
28,17%1,23%
6,47%
10,71%
62,76%
67,08%
10,68%
16,77%
31,60%
12,52%
46,64%
1,57%
24,04%
33,25%
8,74%10,60%
49,03%
2,04%
76,76%
12,47%
3,58%
13,71%
37,63%
5,04%
33,79%37,59%
10,41%
0,04%
9,12%2,76%
14,16%
30,05%
48,49%
29,60%33,23%
5,75%0,57%
12,72%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 54: Percentage of retail data roaming services: RLAH, RLAH +, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
Q2 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
79
EEA average excludes Denmark, FInalnd, Iceland, Spain, Portugal, UK
Finland: fixed periodic tariff data has been combined with alternative tariff data, RLAH has been combined with RLAH+
0,01%
10,89%4,08%
61,51%
89,98%
53,45%
44,13%43,02%
1,95%0,04%3,38%
87,01%
65,25%
20,18%
59,76%
0,00%0,00%
32,41%
0,60%
88,92%
60,17%
41,92%41,34%
46,88%55,32%
38,90%
0,33%
19,64%
30,86%
86,07%
5,43%
7,72%
12,73%14,70%
53,68%
3,97%
69,70%84,58%
6,56%
26,38%
21,83%
18,32%
31,15%
69,52%
26,16%
15,76%
16,53%
7,30%
15,64%
15,14%
50,90%
30,59%
5,62%
59,48%
99,67%
2,43%
7,63% 2,85%
23,17%
7,81%
37,42%
0,05%
60,44%
26,92%1,20%
6,43%4,69%
54,85%
81,03%
9,09%
21,81%
29,34%
14,16%75,44%
0,51%
24,19%
33,18%
7,75%11,64%
34,99%
1,62%
77,92%
13,93%
1,74%
15,66%
35,33%
4,86%
44,31%
35,55%
14,23%
3,68%3,14%0,65%8,67%
44,51%37,68%
7,42%3,26%
9,75%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Figure 55: Percentage of retail data roaming services: RLAH, RLAH +, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
Q3 2016
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
80
38.31%, 2691688,57741.92%, 6920755,975
38.31%, 1104857,59041.92%, 2498907,139
33.25%, 2336361,18133.18%, 5477836,427
12.72%, 893838,5349.75%, 1610276,701
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
Figure 56: EEA percentage of data roaming services: RLAH, RLAH+, fixed periodic tariff, alternative tariff
(in Gb)
RLAH RLAH+ fixed periodic tariff alternative tariff
BoR (17) 102
81
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
EEA average excludes Cyprus, Iceland, Spain, UK
30
,27
8
18
,57
7
22
,57
9
14
,12
3
13
,10
7
24
7,4
90
12
0,5
90
16
0,2
16
58
,13
0
34
,24
6
19
,05
0
33
,26
5
48
,73
1
13
,14
4
11
,97
4 38
,39
2
29
,85
7
49
,99
1
27
,70
2 53
,23
9
28
,49
1
8,0
22 26
,60
0
36
,98
6
15
,40
7
18
,86
0
18
6,1
08
39
,93
5
42
,01
4
50
,70
2
28
,38
7
16
,36
1
15
,33
1
34
2,3
80
14
8,9
10
18
8,8
79
12
6,8
91
54
,86
8
22
,39
3
39
,41
3
58
,87
8
29
,19
1
17
,03
7
55
,64
2
33
,46
7
12
5,3
72
36
,91
0
10
9,3
79
57
,18
9
11
,33
8
27
,32
9
38
,43
4
22
,94
2 51
,29
5
29
0,4
71
62
,98
9
62
,41
3
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Figure 57: data servicesAverage consumption per month per roaming subscriber (in MB)
Q2 and Q3 2016
Q2 2016 Q3 2016
BoR (17) 102
82
Norway: the Q2’16 value is based on data from June 2016
EEA average excludes Cyprus, Denmark, Iceland, Spain, UK
37
3,4
85
10
93
,20
6
56
84
,87
6
15
6,9
25
53
8,2
07
72
8,6
99
18
94
,70
1
11
13
2,2
75
36
50
,60
5
14
22
,84
9
86
9,9
39
32
52
,50
6
54
9,5
43
14
94
,22
0
40
8,6
64
13
04
,42
5
12
58
,08
5
98
9,4
94
10
54
,32
4
98
2,3
66 4
38
4,0
99
54
3,6
22
55
14
,00
2
22
39
,73
4
15
30
5,9
39
55
2,0
03
78
8,9
09
19
99
,25
4
12
73
,97
5
50
0,0
75
21
45
,34
4
15
93
4,5
89
91
8,8
89
15
50
,75
5
18
78
1,9
15
17
59
7,8
29
61
01
,64
7
24
60
,76
0
19
43
,25
3
10
57
1,8
86
94
7,6
30
77
6,2
86
22
16
,94
9
47
6,5
27
16
35
7,4
05
24
66
,39
0
19
86
,31
6
19
20
,19
9
77
3,7
58 34
49
,74
4
34
48
,31
0
80
95
,29
8
47
46
,62
8
17
84
8,5
20
14
27
,98
9
14
93
,62
8
14
82
,79
8
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Figure 58: Retail Data traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q2 2016
(Q2 2012 = 100, Croatia Q2'14 = 100, Liechtenstein Q2'14 = 100)
Q2 '14 Q2 '15 Q2 '16
BoR (17) 102
83
EEA average excludes Cyprus, Denmark, Iceland, Spain, UK
35
9,9
71
10
33
,76
1 58
55
,81
2
65
1,6
59
46
5,5
58
83
0,9
63
21
68
,51
8
95
89
,47
7
60
84
,28
3
14
64
,71
0
68
1,0
08
21
54
,96
6
61
0,8
47
18
22
,44
5
11
91
,26
2
85
8,3
02
16
07
,61
3
13
32
,69
9
44
0,5
69
96
7,0
84
30
72
,61
6
38
9,1
11
12
54
,30
6
25
38
,47
8
36
84
1,7
02
67
5,6
27
73
3,3
31
15
56
,78
3
13
07
,05
5
60
9,0
05
37
95
,74
8
15
43
7,3
80
37
87
,97
1
12
14
,99
4
21
46
0,3
81
15
61
2,6
72
10
34
8,5
76
26
85
,81
5
16
96
,68
7
50
32
,69
0
11
22
,87
0
13
30
,97
6
52
20
,56
7
15
05
,34
2
81
17
,37
5
43
57
,42
0
29
51
,49
5
12
56
,31
4
24
07
,17
9
28
59
,80
4
18
10
,50
5
21
77
,89
9
51
35
,10
0
45
31
9,8
20
21
78
,59
8
19
52
,02
7
17
79
,77
5
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Figure 59: Retail Data traffic Index, intra-EEA roaming calls in Q3 2016
(Q3 2012 = 100, Croatia, Liechtenstein: Q3'13 = 100)
Q3 '14 Q3 '15 Q3 '16
BoR (17) 102
84
5.3. Wholesale roaming (outbound): Agreements
applying Article 3 of the Roaming Regulation
BoR (17) 102
85
16,694
14,623
12,825 13,036
15,921
12,119
10,76610,197
8,161
6,5177,006
5,160
3,5853,133
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 Q1'14 Q2'14 Q3'14 Q4'14 Q1'15 Q2'15 Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2 2016 Q3 2016
eu
ro c
en
ts
Figure 60: Wholesale averages outbound roaming: Voice: Agreements applying Article 3 Roaming Regulation
price per actual min EU/EEA Price Cap
BoR (17) 102
86
4,324
3,7643,618
4,024
3,537
3,073
2,595 2,608
2,163
1,926
2,342 2,290
1,7631,658
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5
5,0
Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 Q1'14 Q2'14 Q3'14 Q4'14 Q1'15 Q2'15 Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2 2016 Q3 2016
eu
ro c
en
ts
Figure 61: Wholesale averages outbound roaming: SMS Agreements applying Article 3 Roaming Regulation
price per SMS EU/EEA Price Cap
BoR (17) 102
87
21,603
14,005
12,778 12,792
11,365
7,236
9,730
8,160
4,666
3,029 2,914 3,027 2,7053,132
0
5
10
15
20
25
eu
ro c
en
ts
Figure 62: Wholesale EEA average outbound roaming: DATA, Agreements applying Article 3 Roaming Regulation
price per MB - EU/EEA Price Cap
BoR (17) 102
88
List of respondents
Operators that provided data for the period 1 April – 30
September 2016:
Austria
A1 Telekom Austria
T-Mobile Austria
Hutchison 3G Austria
Lycamobile
HoT Telekom
Russmedia
Belgium
Belgacom Mobile
KPN Group Belgium (Base)
Mobistar
Bulgaria
Bulgarian Telecommunication Company
(Vivacom)
Telenor Bulgaria
Mobiltel
Croatia
Hrvatski Telekom
Vipnet
Tele2
Cyprus
Cyta
MTN Cyprus
Primetel
Czech Republic
O2 Family
Air Telecom
ČEZ Prodej
DH Telecom
O2 Czech Republic
SAZKA
TERMS
Tesco Mobile ČR
T-Mobile Czech Republic
Vodafone Czech Republic
Denmark
Hi3G Denmark
TDC
Telenor
TeliaDanmark
Estonia
AS EMT
Elisa Eesti
OÜ Top Connect
TELE 2 Eesti
Finland
Ålands Telekommunikation
DNA
Elisa Corporation
TeliaSonera Finland
France
SFR
Bouygues Telecom
Orange Caraïbe
Orange France
Free Mobile
EI Telecom
Lycamobile
SRR
Germany
E-Plus Mobilfunk
Telefónica Germany
Telekom Deutschland
Vodafone D2
Greece
COSMOTE Mobile
Vodafone Panafon
Wind HellasTelecommunications
CYTA HELLAS TILEPIKINONIAKI SA
Hungary
Telenor Magyarország
T-Mobile
Vodafone Magyarország
BoR (17) 102
89
UPC Mobile
Iceland
Nova
Síminn
Vodafone Iceland
Ireland
Eircom Limited/E Mobile
Hutchison 3G Ireland
Meteor Mobile Communications
Telefónica Ireland Limited/(O2)
Tesco Mobile Ireland
Vodafone Ireland
Italy
Coop Voce
Digi Italy
ERG Mobile
Fastweb
Green
H3G Italia
Lycamobile
Poste Mobile
Telecom Italia
Tiscali Italia
Vodafone
Wind Telecomunicazioni
Latvia
Bite Latvia
LatvijasMobilaisTelefons
Tele2
Liechtenstein
Salt (Liechtenstein)
Telecom Liechtenstein
Swisscom (Schweiz)
Lithuania
BitėLietuva
Eurocom
Omnitel
Tele2
Teledema
Luxembourg
Entreprise des postes et télécommunications
Post Télécom
Tango
Orange Communications Luxembourg
Luxembourg Online Mobile
Transatel Lux.
Malta
Melita Mobile
Mobisle Communications (GO Mobile)
RedtouchFone
Vodafone Malta
YOM
Netherlands
KPN
Lebara
Lycamobile Distribution
Tele2 Netherlands
T-Mobile Netherlands
Vodafone Libertel
Norway
Lycamobile
Phonero
Telenor
TeliaSonera Norge
Poland
P4
Polkomtel
T-Mobile Polska
Orange Polska
Portugal
CTT – Correios de Portugal
NOS Comunicações, S.A
MEO – Serviços de Comunicações e
Multimédia,S.A.
Vodafone Portugal – Comunicações
Pessoais.S.A.
LycaMobile Portugal,Lda
Mundio Mobile (Portugal) Limited (on the 23rd of
March 2017 Mundio Mobile (Portugal) Limited
changed its social designation to Vectone Mobile
(Portugal) Limited)
NOWO Communications, S.A
ONITELECOM - Infocomunicações, S.A.
BoR (17) 102
90
Romania
Telekom RMC
Orange Romania
RCS&RDS
Vodafone Romania
Telekom RC
Lycamobile
Slovak Republic
O2 Slovakia
Orange Slovensko
Slovak Telekom
SWAN Mobile
Slovenia
Telekom Slovenije
Si.mobil
Telemach
T-2
Izi mobil
Mega M
Spain
Euskaltel
Orange
TelefónicaMóviles de España
Vodafone
Yoigo
Sweden
Hi3G Access
Telenor Sverige
TeliaSonera
Tele2 Sverige
Switzerland
Orange Communications
Sunrise Communications
Swisscom (Schweiz)
United Kingdom
3 UK
O2 UK
Everything Everywhere
Vodafone UK
Tesco Mobile
Virgin Mobil