INTERNATIONAL PROJECT ON INNOVATIVE NUCLEAR … 1... · improvements/risks in nuclear energy system...
Transcript of INTERNATIONAL PROJECT ON INNOVATIVE NUCLEAR … 1... · improvements/risks in nuclear energy system...
IAEA IAEA
International Atomic Energy Agency
INTERNATIONAL PROJECT ON INNOVATIVE NUCLEAR REACTORS
AND FUEL CYCLES (INPRO)
Presented by Zoran Drace
on the behalf of the INPRO Section
8th Dialog Forum
26 August 2014, IAEA HQ, Vienna
IAEA 2
Presentation Outline
• INPRO Status
• INPRO Membership
• INPRO Tasks 1, 2, 3,4
• Tasks linkages
• Tasks Activities
IAEA
INPRO STATUS
3
IAEA
INPRO Status
• INPRO is the Section in the Division of Nuclear Power (NENP)
• Section Head reports to the Director NENP
• Programmatically Section reports to the INPRO Project Manager which is the DDG NE
• The major funding of INPRO activities, comes mainly from the extra-budgetary resources
INPRO (Gowin 2012) 4
IAEA
INPRO MEMBERSHIP
5
IAEA
INPRO Membership 2001-2014
INPRO (Gowin 2012) 6
IAEA
INPRO TASKS
7
IAEA
Vision: Programme Development
8
INPRO Development Vision 2017
– INPRO’s activities are centered on the key concepts of global
nuclear energy sustainability and the development of nuclear
energy strategies toward sustainability
– INPRO’s approach is a holistic and global view of nuclear energy
systems together with the pursuit of innovations in nuclear energy
IAEA
INPRO TASKS
Task 1:
INPRO provides long-term scenario evaluation using dynamic simulation
of national, regional and global nuclear energy systems
Task 2:
INPRO designs and convenes collaborative projects on topics crucial to
future nuclear sustainability and technological innovations
Task 3:
INPRO assists Member States to build sustainable nuclear energy
program strategies and plans through Nuclear Energy System
Assessments (NESAs), using the INPRO Methodology
Task 4:
INPRO encourages and organises Dialogue Forums on subjects of
immediate interest to INPRO members and to the larger nuclear energy
community
9
IAEA
INPRO TASKS LINKAGES
10
IAEA
Project Linkages- INPRO Methodology
and Global Scenarios
11
INPRO Methodology: Sustainability Assessment
• INPRO has developed a methodology for nuclear energy system
(NES) assessment regarding sustainability based on a
comprehensive set of internationally agreed basic principles,
requirements and criteria in the important areas of economics,
safety, waste management, proliferation resistance, physical
protection, environment and infrastructure.
• Meeting the INPRO criteria in all of the areas ensures
sustainability of nuclear energy system and its high potential to
meet growing energy demand throughout the present century.
• Through NES assessments (NESAs), the INPRO Methodology
can help Member States define their nuclear energy strategies for
the near- (up to 2030), medium- (2030-2050) and long- term
(2050-2100)
IAEA
Project Linkages- INPRO Methodology
and Global Scenarios
12
Global scenarios
• Once the targeted NES is assessed to be sustainable the question
arises how to make a transition from the current fleet of reactors and
nuclear fuel cycle facilities to such a sustainable NES.
• The INPRO activities on global nuclear energy scenarios have the
objective to develop global and regional nuclear energy scenarios, on
the basis of a scientific-technical analysis, that lead to a global vision
on sustainable nuclear energy development during the 21st century.
• Specifically, they help participating Member States to identify and
assess how to make a transition to future sustainable NESs, how
national energy systems could contribute to, and benefit from, nuclear
energy sustainability on a regional and global level, what is the role of
collaboration among countries in the transition and what could be
‘win-win’ strategies for collaboration between suppliers and users
IAEA
INPRO Integration
• Projects 1 & 2 are integrated at different levels. For example: • Both projects support decision making regarding desired innovations in
reactors and nuclear fuel cycles
• Service packages developed in both projects such as NES scenarios modelling and NESA are provided in integrated way (e.g. Romania, Ukraine)
• Selection of Key Indicators from GAINS and INPRO Methodology would facilitate developing guidance on the evaluation of substantial improvements/risks in nuclear energy system performance potentially achievable with innovative nuclear technologies.
• The new proposed KIND project is to produce inputs for further improvement of the INPRO methodology (along Track 2) to enable its effective application for comparative assessments of innovative nuclear energy systems.
13
IAEA
INPRO TASKS ACTIVITIES
14
IAEA
TASK 1
Global nuclear energy
scenarios
INPRO Steering Committee #18 (2011) 15
IAEA
Global Nuclear Energy Scenarios
• TASK 1 helps participating countries define
comprehensive national energy strategies by providing
a framework for the analysis and assessment of:
• transition from the current fleet of nuclear reactors and
fuel cycles to a sustainable nuclear energy system
• how a national nuclear energy system could contribute
to, and benefit from, sustainability of regional and global
nuclear energy systems
• the role that collaboration with other countries may play
in transition
•
16
IAEA
Global Nuclear Energy Scenarios:
Current Activities
Objective:
Develop global and regional nuclear energy scenarios, on the basis of a
dynamic NES modelling and analysis, leading to a global vision of
sustainable nuclear energy development in the 21st century
Recently completed collaborative project:
Collaborative project GAINS (Global Architectures of Innovative Nuclear Energy
Systems with Thermal and Fast Reactors and Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle) (2008-2011)
– Final Report IAEA Nuclear Energy Series NP-T-1.14 is published.
Ongoing collaborative project:
Collaborative Project SYNERGIES (Synergistic Nuclear Energy Regional Group
Interactions Evaluated for Sustainability) (2011–2014)
Planned collaborative projects:
ROADMAPS for a transition to globally sustainable nuclear energy systems and KIND
– key indicators for innovative NES (2014–2015)
17
IAEA
Global Nuclear Energy Scenarios:
GAINS
18
GAINS dynamic system analysis
framework: heterogeneous world model
IAEA
Collaborative project KIND
19
Assessment with the INPRO methodology requires reasonably detailed design
information for the components of a nuclear energy system. For evolutionary systems
such information is typically available, while future innovative nuclear energy systems
that are still under development normally have design information insufficient for a full-
scope INPRO assessment.
Development of innovative systems could benefit from comparative analysis and
assessment, which is not in the objective of the current INPRO methodology.
Outputs:
The KIND project will produce inputs for further improvement of the INPRO methodology
(along Track 2) to enable its effective application for comparative assessments of
innovative nuclear energy systems.
Specifically, the defined limited number of key indicators may further on facilitate the use
of advanced methods of expert judgement aggregation.
KIND is also expected to provide inputs for the ROADMAPS collaborative project to
enable more comprehensive assessments of collaborative transition scenarios to future
sustainable nuclear energy systems.
IAEA
TASK 2
Innovations
INPRO Steering Committee #18 (2011) 20
IAEA
TASK 2: INNOVATIONS
Activities:
Disseminate good practices in enhancing collaboration in innovations to
support sustainable NES from Action Plan 2012-2013).
Collaborative project RISC (from Action Plan 2012-2013).
CP on SMR - phase II: case study for the deployment of factory fuelled
small sized reactor (new proposal).
Collaborative project FANES (new proposal).
Collaborative project WIRAF (new proposal).
21
IAEA
TASK 2: INNOVATIONS
Good practices in enhancing collaboration
Objectives:
Disseminate to Member States, including INPRO Members, world-wide good
practices in establishing effective mechanisms for collaboration in R&D,
particularly, applicable to the nuclear energy field including the area of NES.
Suggest a framework that may further support Member States in pursuing
innovations, in particular, for the development and deployment of sustainable
NES.
Duration: 2013 - 2015
22
IAEA
TASK 2: INNOVATIONS
RISC
Objective:
To demonstrate that the evolution of safety requirements and related
technical and institutional innovations in nuclear technologies provide
continued progress to ultimately meet the requirement to avoid relocation
or evacuation measures outside NPP sites in case of severe accident.
Scope:
Review of advanced reactor concepts with a focus on technologies that claim to
satisfy the requirement to avoid relocation or evacuation measures outside NPP
sites in case of severe accident;
Using the INPRO methodology, perform an assessment on one or more of these
concepts using an assumed nuclear power system. Proof is required that the ‘last
barrier’ does not fail under multiple simultaneous natural and technical disasters or
human error;
Duration: 2013 - 2015
23
IAEA
TASK 2: INNOVATIONS
Factory Fuelled SMR: Institutional and Legal issues of
deployment
Objective:
To examine in more detail legal and institutional issues for export deployment of a
SMR with factory fuelled and tested reactor and, to outline possible contents of an
international treaty among the supplier State, the host State and all involved third
countries that could facilitate such a deployment.
Scope:
Investigate in more details ‘gaps’ and an insufficient coverage in the international
nuclear law and related regulation for export deployment of SMR which is
manufactured, fuelled and tested at a factory.
Outline possible contents of an international treaty among the Supplier State, the
host State and all involved third countries that could facilitate such a deployment.
.
Duration: 2015 - 2017
24
IAEA
TASK 2: INNOVATIONS
Collaborative project Nuclear Fuel and Fuel Cycle analysis
for future NES (FANES)
Objectives:
Carry out feasibility analyses of advanced and innovative fuels and its
influences on development of future NES.
Analyse spent fuel management options for advanced and innovative FC
addressing potential technology improvements.
Prepare proposals for further developing of the INPRO methodology.
Duration: 2014 - 2016
25
IAEA
TASK 2: INNOVATIONS
Collaborative project Waste from Innovative Types of
Reactors and Fuel Cycles (WIRAF)
Objectives:
To Identify any problematic waste from innovative reactor designs and
corresponding nuclear fuel cycles which could influence development and
deployment of future NES.
Analyze problematic waste streams that may require either further
enhancement of existing waste management processes/technologies or
initiation for development of new one.
Discuss the technologies needed for processing of problematic waste
streams.
Provide recommendations for further international cooperation in this area.
Duration: 2014 - 2016
.
26
IAEA
TASK 3
National long-range nuclear
energy strategies
27
IAEA
INPRO Methodology for nuclear energy system assessment (NESA) - a
comprehensive, internationally agreed criteria-based sustainability assessment in
areas of economics, safety, waste management, proliferation resistance, physical
protection, environment and infrastructure
28
National Nuclear Energy Strategies:
INPRO Methodology
IAEA 29
Architecture of INPRO Methodology.
NES Sustainability Assessment – NESA
Basic Principles : goals for development of
sustainable NES (14).
User Requirements:
what should be done by
designer, operator, industry
and/or State to meet goal
defined in Basic Principles (52).
Criteria-Indicators &
Acceptance Limits: Metrics to check whether a User
Requirement has been met
(125).
Basic Principles
User Requirements
Criteria
IAEA
Update of the INPRO Methodology
• Current INPRO Methodology (TECDOC-1575, rev. 1, 2008) is
being updated and revised
• Task 1 revisions are being published as separate NE Series
Documents (9 documents) • These revisions are being done under a consultancy process
• Comments that do not largely alter Methodology scope and approach are
being resolved under Task 1
• Each manual has accumulated formal comments from Member States
• Economics and Infrastructure manual are published and additional
manuals are proceeding through the editing process
• Dialogue Forum planned to introduce the revised set of three Manuals
• Task 1 should be finalized in 2013-15 time frame
• Potential Task 2 revisions are only partially defined and include
significant changes in scope and approach
IAEA
NESA: Current efforts
• NESA completed in Belarus: • Full scope assessment of all INPRO methodology areas;
• NES consisting of power plant and waste management facilities;
• NESA Published in full as TECDOC-1716.
• NESA on-going in Indonesia: • Full scope assessment of two types of reactors and fuel cycle facilities;
• To be completed in 2014 (Discussion of the NESA extension are
ongoing).
• NESA on-going in Ukraine: • Limited scope: economics, infrastructure, waste management;
• To be completed in 2015.
• NESA on-going in Romania: • Full scope assessment of two types of reactors and fuel cycle facilities;
• To be completed in 2016.
IAEA
Limited Scope INPRO Assessment of
LMFR
• “Limited scope INPRO Methodology assessment to demonstrate
readiness for application to innovative technology” :
• Perform limited scope (i.e. focussing on the reactor) full depth
(comprising all relevant INPRO areas at criteria level) assessment of
specific SFR design(s) to demonstrate readiness of the Methodology
for this purpose;
• Study may provide insights on any criteria that require adjustment or
addition to extend the utility of the Methodology;
• Demonstration of the readiness of INPRO Methodology for this
application will bolster credibility of the approach for national NESAs
involving next generation reactor designs;
• A TECDOC presenting the findings will be published, taking into
account proprietary information concerns if/when appropriate.
32
IAEA
TASK 3: Collaborative Projects
• CP PROSA
• Objective: Make assessment of PR simpler and easier to
understand. Develop a coordinated set of GIF/INPRO PR and
safeguardability analysis/assessment tools. Advise on 2nd edition of
INPRO Methodology, volume 5, “Proliferation Resistance.”
• CP ENV-PE
• Objective: Provide a framework for a common understanding of potential
radiation doses released in accident scenarios and the assessment of
related risks to humans, based on technical discussions, exchange of
experience, best practices and specific comparisons of estimates
conducted by Member State experts.
33
IAEA
TASK 4
Policy and dialogue
34
IAEA
INPRO Steering Committee
35
• Meetings held once or twice in a year
• Alignment of INPRO actions with GC Resolutions
• Approval of biennial Action Plan
• Monitoring progress
• Agreement of members to participate in Collaborative Projects
IAEA
Dialogue Forum
• 8 Dialogue Forums have been
convened since 2010: • Socio & macroeconomic factors;
• Multilateral approaches to nuclear energy
deployment;
• Common user considerations for SMRs;
36
• Drivers and impediments for regional cooperation on sustainable NESs;
• Long term prospects for nuclear energy post Fukushima (Seoul);
• SMR licensing and safety issues.
• Sustainability of nuclear energy systems based on evolutionary reactors;
• Nuclear energy system sustainability focusing on the area of economics,
resources availability and institutional arrangements
• Planned Dialogue Forums: • November 2014: International collaboration on innovations: towards global
sustainable nuclear energy.
• May 2015: Cooperative Approaches to the Back End of Nuclear Fuel Cycle:
drivers and legal, institutional and financial impediments
• November 2015: ROADMAPS
IAEA
INPRO 7th Dialogue Forum: Sustainability of NES
Based on Evolutionary Reactors
• Place and Date : Vienna, IAEA Headquarters, 19-22 Nov 2013
• Objectives : Familiarize Member States with INPRO Methodology
Discuss assessment of evolutionary reactors, mainly in safety area
Discuss case studies and lessons learned
Discuss salient features of reactors, and important role of vendors
• Participating vendors: AREVA, ROSATOM, GE-Hitachi, Hitachi-GE,
KEPCO, Mitsubishi, CANDU Energy
Preparatory meeting with
Vendors, Vienna, 19-21 Aug 2013 A unique opportunity for Member States to
participate and interact with 7 Major Vendors
of Evolutionary Reactors who delivered
exemplary INPRO Methodology assessment of their reactor technology
IAEA
INPRO 9th Dialogue Forum: International collaboration on
innovations: towards global sustainable nuclear energy
This meeting is open to approx. 100 participants from 84 Member States:
• Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Belarus,
Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Cuba, Czech
Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece,
Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Republic of
Korea, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Mongolia, Montenegro,
Morocco, Namibia, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland,
Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia,
Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland,
Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tunisia, Turkey,
Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uzbekistan,
the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Viet Nam, Zambia, Zimbabwe
17 intergovernmental and international organizations will also participate
• FORATOM, European Commission, CERN, ENEN Association, European Commission’s
Joint Research Centre (JRC), Generation IV International Forum (GIF), IFNEC,
International Science and Technology Center (ISTC), ITER Organization, SNETP)
OECD’s Multinational Design Evaluation Programme (MDEP), OECD/NEA, the Western
European Nuclear Regulators Association (WENRA), WANO, World Institute for Nuclear
Security (WINS), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), WNA
• .
38
IAEA 39
Thank you for your attention!