International Conference on CCS: Session 3.4 - Mr. Nakicenovic Nebojsa
Transcript of International Conference on CCS: Session 3.4 - Mr. Nakicenovic Nebojsa
NebojNebojšša Nakia NakiććenovienoviććInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis xx
Technische Universität WienTechnische Universität Wien [email protected]
Global Energy Perspectives Global Energy Perspectives and the Role of CCSand the Role of CCS
International Carbon Capture and Storage Conference, Jointly Organized International Carbon Capture and Storage Conference, Jointly Organized by NDRC and ADB, China World Hotel, Beijing – 28-29 July 2011by NDRC and ADB, China World Hotel, Beijing – 28-29 July 2011
IIASAIIASAInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Confronting the Challenges of Energy forConfronting the Challenges of Energy for Sustainable Development: Sustainable Development:
The Role of Scientific and Technical AnalysisThe Role of Scientific and Technical Analysis
and its international partners presentand its international partners present
www.www.GlobalEnergyAssessmentGlobalEnergyAssessment.org.org
#3
Access to energy and ecosystem services (a prerequisite for MDGs & wellbeing)
Vigorous decarbonization for mitigating climate change brings multiple co-benefits
Energy transformations require R&D and technology diffusion & sustained investments
Global Energy Transformations
Global Carbon Pools Based on GEAGlobal Carbon Pools Based on GEA
14
Gas Hydrates~6,600 – 57,000
GtCO2
Gas Hydrates~100,000
GtCO2
Coal~ 29,000 – 43,000 GtCO2
Unconv. . Oil~1,100–1,500
GtCO2
N. Gas~340–500
GtCO2
Oil ~660–1,000
GtCO2
Soils~10,000 GtCO2
Atmosphere~3100 GtCO2
Unconventional Natural Gas
~2,450 – 4,550 GtCO2
Biomass~1,600–
1,650GtCO2
#5
Access to energy and ecosystem services (a prerequisite for MDGs & wellbeing)
Vigorous decarbonization for mitigating climate change brings multiple co-benefits
Energy transformations require R&D and technology diffusion & sustained investments
Global Energy Transformations
#6
Global Carbon EmissionsGlobal Carbon Emissions
Peak by 2020
reductions of 35-75% by 2050
almost zero or negative in the long term
#71850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Other renewablesNuclearGasOilCoalBiomass
Microchip
Commercialaviation
TelevisionVacuum
tubeGasolineengine
Electricmotor
Steam engine
Nuclearenergy
Biomass
Coal
RenewablesNuclearNuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary EnergyGlobal Primary Energy
#81850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Other renewablesNuclearGasOilCoalBiomass
Microchip
Commercialaviation
TelevisionVacuum
tubeGasolineengine
Electricmotor
Steam engine
Nuclearenergy
Biomass
Coal
RenewablesNuclearNuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary EnergyGlobal Primary EnergyEfficiency – High Nuclear
Source: GEA KM17 (in preparation)
PAS
#91850 1900 1950 2000 2050
EJ
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200Other renewablesNuclearGasOilCoalBiomass
Microchip
Commercialaviation
TelevisionVacuum
tubeGasolineengine
Electricmotor
Steam engine
Nuclearenergy
Biomass
Coal
RenewablesNuclearNuclear
Oil
Gas
Global Primary EnergyGlobal Primary EnergyEfficiency – Low Nuclear
Source: GEA KM17 (in preparation)
PAS
#10
2500GEA-Efficiency
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Pri
mary
Energ
y, EJ per
year
0
500
1000
1500
2000Energy savings (efficiency, conservation, and behavior)
Fossil CCS (bridging technology)
Bio-CCS & negative emissions (long-term)
Phase-out of oil in the medium term(necessary)
Coal wCCSCoal woCCSBiomass wCCSBiomass woCCS
NuclearGas wCCSGas woCCSOil
SavingsGeothermalSolarWind
Efficiency & “Smart” SystemsEfficiency & “Smart” Systems(= high flexibility for supply)(= high flexibility for supply)
~50% renewables by 2050
No expansion of nuclear (choice)
Source: Riahi, GEA
#11
Fossil and Bio CCSFossil and Bio CCS
0
5
10
15
20
25
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
GtCO
2 Fossil CCS
bio-CCS
Median and 85th percentile rangeSource: Riahi, GEA
#12
2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Cum
ula
tive
carb
on s
tore
d (G
tCO
2)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Sup
ply
Mix
Effi
cie
ncy
Carbon Capture and StorageCarbon Capture and Storage GEA scenarios: World (GtCOGEA scenarios: World (GtCO22))
Commercialization (2030)
rapid upscaling (2050)
Max ~ 2500 GtCO2
Transformation possible without CCS (however, needs strong efficiency focus!)
Atmosphere
Source: Riahi, GEA
#13
CCS Potentials & Deployment
0
100
200
300
400
500
Gt C
O2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2
Potential - Best
Potential - High
Fossil CCS - Mimimum
Fossil CCS - Maximum
Bio CCS - Minimum
Bio CCS - Maximum
Storage potential: Hendricks, 2004Prosperity map: Bradshaw, 2005
2030
#14
0
100
200
300
400
500
Gt C
O2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2
Potential - Best
Potential - High
Fossil CCS - Mimimum
Fossil CCS - Maximum
Bio CCS - Minimum
Bio CCS - Maximum
Storage potential: Hendricks, 2004Prosperity map: Bradshaw, 2005
2050
CCS Potentials & Deployment
#15
0
100
200
300
400
500
Gt C
O2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2
Potential - Best
Potential - High
Fossil CCS - Mimimum
Fossil CCS - Maximum
Bio CCS - Minimum
Bio CCS - Maximum
Storage potential: Hendricks, 2004Prosperity map: Bradshaw, 2005
2100
CCS Potentials & Deployment
#16
0
100
200
300
400
500
Gt C
O2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2
Potential - Best
Potential - High
Fossil CCS - Mimimum
Fossil CCS - Maximum
Bio CCS - Minimum
Bio CCS - Maximum
Storage potential: Hendricks, 2004Prosperity map: Bradshaw, 2005
2100
CCS Potentials & Deployment
Access to energy and ecosystem services (a prerequisite for MDGs & wellbeing)
Vigorous decarbonization for mitigating climate change brings multiple co-benefits
Energy transformations require R&D and technology diffusion & sustained investments
Global Energy Transformations
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
FF
19
98
/kWUS
$2
00
5/k
W
Cumulative GW installed
US Nuclear: Average and Minimum/Maximum 1971-1996
US Nuclear: Single Reactor (No Range) 1971-1996
France Nuclear: Average and Min/Max 1977-1999
Solar PV: worldwide average 1975-2009 US$2005/kW
Offshore wind: all European projects 1999-2008 US$2005/kW
Source: Gruebler, GEA
Investment CostsPhotovoltaics, Offshore Wind and Nuclear
18
Oil Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil ElectricityNuclear
Renewable Electricity
Other conversion
2050
Today($185 billion)
No Sustainability Policies($370 billion)
2005-2010
Oil
Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil Electricity
Nuclear
Renewable Electricity
Other conversion
2010 & 2050Investment Portfolio – China
19Source: GEA
Efficiency(marginal)
OilGasCoal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil Electricity
Renewable Electricity
CCS
Other conversion
Oil Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil ElectricityNuclear
Renewable Electricity
Other conversion
2005-2010
20502050
Oil
Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil Electricity
Nuclear
Renewable Electricity
Other conversion
Today($185 billion)
No Sustainability Policies($370 billion)
GEA-Efficiency($407 billion)
2010 & 2050Investment Portfolio – China
20Source: GEA
Co-Benefits of Energy Investments
Co-Benefits of Energy Investments
Industrialized55%
Developing45%Demand (Energy
components)
Oil
Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission/Distr.
Fossil Electricity
NuclearRenewable Electricity
Other conversion
Upstream:Fossil Fuels 30%
Electricity 40%
$1250 billion (including demand)World Energy Investments 2010
23Source: GEA
Efficiency(marginal)
Oil
Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil Electricity
Nuclear
Renewable Electricity
CCS
Other conversion
Oil Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil ElectricityNuclear
Renewable Electricity
Other conversion
2050 2050
Today($185 billion)
No Sustainability Policies($370 billion)
GEA-Supply($530 billion)
2005-2010
Oil
Gas
Coal
Electricity Transmission
Fossil Electricity
Nuclear
Renewable Electricity
Other conversion
2010 & 2050Investment Portfolio – China
24Source: GEA
#25
COCO22 Removal Removal Fossil CCS + Bio CSS + ForestsFossil CCS + Bio CSS + Forests
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100
MtC
O2
Afforestation/reforestation
Biomass to H2
Bio-liquids2
Bio-liquids1
Biomass Gasification (Power)
Biomass Power (post combustion)
Industry (cement)
Gas to liquids
SMR (natural gas)
Gas Combined Cycle
Gas Power
Coal to liquids
Coal gasification + H2
Coal IGCC (power)
Coal post combustion (power)
Coal power (retrofit)
Source: Riahi, GEA
#26
Biomass potential vs deploymentBiomass potential vs deploymentlong term (2100)long term (2100)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Do
rnb
urg
(20
10
)
IIA
SA (2
00
7)
van
Vu
ure
n (
20
08
)
IIA
SA (2
00
7)
GEA
(2
01
1)
IIA
SA (2
00
7)
GEA
(2
01
1)
EJ
Biomass potential
Biomass use(stringent CC scenarios)
Biomass CCS(stringent CC scenarios)S
cena
rio
unce
rtai
nty
residues*
Pro
duct
ivity
Deg
rada
tion
Sus
tain
abili
tycr
iteria
* 40 EJ residues from Fisher et al (2007) added in GEA
#27
Data: NASA 1880-2010
Earth is Warming
Global warming predicted(Sawyer, Nature 1972,
Broecker, Science 1975)