International Comparison of Oilseed Pruduction
-
Upload
xaviera-holder -
Category
Documents
-
view
62 -
download
3
description
Transcript of International Comparison of Oilseed Pruduction
Institute of Farm Economics
International Comparison of Oilseed Pruduction
Prof. Dr. Folkhard Isermeyer & Dr. Yelto ZimmerGCIRC Technical Meeting, New Delhi, February 2009
Isermeyer
Content
1 The global network agri benchmark:
goal and concept
2 Selected results
2.1 Sector developments
2.2 Production systems, cost of production
3 Summary
Isermeyer
Content
1 The global network agri benchmark:
goal and concept
2 Selected results
2.1 Sector developments
2.2 Production systems, cost of production
3 Summary
Isermeyer
Everything under Control ?
agri benchmark is part of a global navigation system for the agricultural sector
For typical farms we provide information about:
Production systems Cost of production Framework conditions
0 500 n. 100 120 140 160 180 190 200
0
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
Mio.Entwicklung der
Weltbevölkerung
0 20001000
World Population
Before take-off we should have a good navigation tool
Isermeyer
Components of agri benchmark
Typical Farms & farmers & advisors
Dairy Beef Arable CropsThe Networks
Quantitative
Analysis
Opportunity cost
US
$ /
100
kg F
CM
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
CH
-33
CH
-70
DE
-35
DE
-68
DE
-650
FR-3
1
FR-7
0
FI-2
0
FI-4
0
PL-
3
PL-
20
PL-
180
H-1
00
H-4
00
US
-70
US
-600
US
-210
0
AR
150
AR
600
BR
-20
BR
-60
IN-2
IN-2
2
AU
-206
AU
-250
NZ-
229
NZ-
447
Cost P&L account - non milk returns
Countries: CH DE FR FI PL HU US AR BR IN AU NZ
Milk price
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Farm
inco
me
in 1
,000
Eur
o
Baseline: Agenda, milk price -11,2%Agenda, milk price -15%Agenda without milk market reform
Isermeyer
• Analysing international trade flows
(e.g. FAO and OECD data bank)
• Compiling regional information on a global level
(commodity prices, legal framework conditions,
potential for expansion of agricultural land)
• Forecasting regional farm development
(„Snapshot“: farmers compare their future with others)
Typical farms are the backbone, but agri benchmark is much more …
Isermeyer
Partners in agri benchmark cash crop (I)
Countries in agri benchmark Cash Crop
Priorities for new countries
Isermeyer
Canada
USA/Iowa
USA / N. Dakota
Brazil
Argentina
South Africa
Partners in agri benchmark cash crop (II)
UK
Italy
France
Sweden
Denmark
Ukraine
Hungary
Czech Rep.
Russia
Poland
Romania
China
Malaysia
Australia
Isermeyer
Partners in agri benchmark cash crop (III)
4th agri benchmark Cash Crop Conference, Canada, July 6-1, 2008
Isermeyer
Content
1 The global network agri benchmark:
goal and concept
2 Selected results
2.1 Sector developments
2.2 Production systems, cost of production
3 Summary
Isermeyer
Impact of Bioenergy Policy: Evolution of Global Ethanol Production
Quelle: FO Licht, Impact of Biofuels on Commodity Markets (2007).
Isermeyer
Stocks shrinked by 50% (from 112 to < 60 days)Accumulated
deficit (till 2007/08):
-148 Mio. t
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Impact of US Ethanol Production on the World Markets for Grains
1) April-Projection of USDA-WAOB. 2) Estimated 3) World production and/or consumption of coarse grains, in mio. t.
Surplus + 33 - 4 - 25 - 17 - 63 - 64 + 57 - 16 - 48 - 1
Production3)
Consumption3)
1.4811.448
1998/99
1.4631.467
1999/00
1.4441.468
2000/01
1.4751.492
2001/02
1.4431.506
2002/03
1.4711.534
2003/04
1.6441.587
2004/05
1.5881.604
2005/06
1.5851.633
2006/07
1.6871.688
2007/081)
Corn Use for US-Ethanol (Mio. t) 16 18 25 29 34 41 54 76
Quelle: USDA, ACTI, eigene Berechnungen.
US-Corn – DDGS (Mio. t) 11 13 18 20 24 29 38 53
Accumulated deficit, if US-ethanol would not have expan-ded since 2000 (till 2007/08):
-30 Mio. t-100
-50
0
50
100
150
+17
1.7601.743
2008/092)
10473
Isermeyer
Interim Conclusions
Is it possible, that bioenergy crops on less than 2% of the global acerage have caused such a price increase? Short term: „yes“, because 60 mio. t represent ¼ of the world grain trade.
Long term: „no“, because 60 mio. t require 10 mio. ha, and there are more than 100 mio. ha unused.
Besides: High commodity prices lead to intensification and yield increases on cultivated acreage.
Bioenergy can be produced on much more than 2% of global agricultural land.
Challenge: Find the appropriate pathway for expansion (best product mix and no „overburdening“ of global agriculture)
And: We should not pretend that bioenergy can fuel the world (500 mio. ha a 80 GJ/ha = 40 EJ = <10% of global energy consumption)
Isermeyer
Conclusions re. future commodity prices
In principal two alternative szenarios are possible:
I. Global economy takes off again and policies to promote biofuels are pursued aggressively (high mandatory blending rates).
In a few years commodity prices will be very high again
II. Global economy takes off again but policies to promote biofuel are put on hold.
Commodity prices will be driven by crude oil prices:
– 40 $/bbl: „old“ price levels (pre 2006) will prevail
– 100 $/bbl: prices go up in the medium and long run
(„long run“, because first investments in plants are needed for the bushel-barrel correlation to be realized)
Isermeyer
Development of vegetable oil prices (USD/t)
0
200
400
600
800
1.000
1.200
1.400
1.600
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Palm oil (1)
Rapeseed oil (2)
Soybean oil (2)
Sunflower oil (3)
Source: FAO, own calculations; (1) Crude, cif North West Europe, (2) Dutch, fob ex-mill, (3) fob North West European port
Isermeyer
Development of price premium for rapeseed vs. soybean oil (USD/t & in %)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0,00
0,05
0,10
0,15
0,20
0,25
0,30
0,35
premium (in USD/t)
premium (in %)
Isermeyer
Content
1 The global network agri benchmark:
goal and concept
2 Selected results
2.1 Sector developments
2.2 Production systems, cost of production
3 Summary
Isermeyer
Oilseed yields agri benchmark farms 2007 (t/ha)
Rapeseed: EU yields twice as high as in overseas. Strong position of soybeans
0,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
2,5
3,0
3,5
4,0
4,5
KA
S1
60
00
NK
*
RU
10
00
0B
S*
RU
10
00
0B
S*
CN
5X
I
CZ
12
00
JM*
DE
30
0O
W
DE
13
00
SA
*
DE
16
00
MV
P
DK
52
8F
U
FR
15
0B
I
FR
20
0C
HB
S*
FR
23
0P
ICB
HU
11
5N
GP
HU
11
00
TC
PL
20
00
ST
*
RO
60
0T
R*
SE
33
5S
K
SE
55
0L
AV
UK
25
5E
A
UK
44
0S
UF
F
UK
80
0C
AM
*
AU
S3
00
0W
A
AU
S5
00
0W
A*
ZA
20
43
SA
CA
18
00
LB
BR
19
5P
R
BR
13
00
MT
US
07
00
IA
US
90
0N
D
RU
10
00
0B
S*
HU
11
5N
GP
HU
11
00
TC
IT4
3E
R
RO
60
0T
R*
EAST EU SH NA SH NA EA EU
Rapeseed Soybeans Sunflower
Isermeyer
Vegetable oil production (t/ha)
0,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
KA
S16
000N
K*
RU
1000
0BS
*
RU
1000
0BS
*
CN
5XI
CZ
1200
JM*
DE
300O
W
DE
1300
SA
*
DE
1600
MV
P
DK
528F
U
FR
150B
I
FR
200C
HB
S*
FR
230P
ICB
HU
115N
GP
HU
1100
TC
PL2
000S
T*
RO
600T
R*
SE
335S
K
SE
550L
AV
UK
255E
A
UK
440S
UF
F
UK
800C
AM
*
AU
S30
00W
A
AU
S50
00W
A*
ZA
2043
SA
CA
1800
LB
BR
195P
R
BR
1300
MT
US
0700
IA
US
900N
D
RU
1000
0BS
*
HU
115N
GP
HU
1100
TC
IT43
ER
RO
600T
R*
EAST EU SH NA SH NA EA EU
Rapeseed Soybeans Sunflower
0.7 0.80.6
Isermeyer
Total cost of oilseed production (USD/t)
Major issue for European producers: high land cost (will decrease with decreasing direct payments) and high operating cost
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
KA
S1
60
00
NK
*
RU
10
00
0B
S*
RU
10
00
0B
S*
CN
5X
I
CZ
12
00
JM*
DE
30
0O
W
DE
13
00
SA
*
DE
16
00
MV
P
DK
52
8F
U
FR
15
0B
I
FR
20
0C
HB
S*
FR
23
0P
ICB
HU
11
5N
GP
HU
11
00
TC
PL
20
00
ST
*
RO
60
0T
R*
SE
33
5S
K
SE
55
0L
AV
UK
25
5E
A
UK
44
0S
UF
F
UK
80
0C
AM
*
CA
18
00
LB
AU
S3
00
0W
A
AU
S5
00
0W
A*
ZA
20
43
SA
BR
19
5P
R
BR
13
00
MT
US
07
00
IA
US
90
0N
D
RU
10
00
0B
S*
HU
11
5N
GP
HU
11
00
TC
IT4
3E
R
RO
60
0T
R*
EAST EU NA SH SH NA EA EU
Rapeseed Soybeans Sunflower
Direct cost Operating cost Building cost Land cost Miscellaneous
Isermeyer
Operating cost: Major differences between Europe and Overseas (3 Example, 2006)
Hv D D S R
II
GrF(I) H H
NSu
NSu P K
August September OctoberApril May June JulyJanuary February March
I
France 150 ha, rapeseed following barley, reduced tillage
Tillage etc.1)
Plant protection
Fertilization
S
H H (H) (I)NPKSu
Hv
April May June July August September
Canada 2,430 ha, rapeseed following fallow, no tillage
Hv
H
January February March April May June
S
December
Argentina 1,800 ha, Soybean following Soybean (DC with wheat), no-till
1) incl. seeding & harvest
Tillage etc.1)
Plant protection
Fertilization
Tillage etc.1)
Plant protection
Fertilization
Isermeyer
Crop establishment cost (USD/ha)
Per hectare: EU cost 3 - 4 times higher, yields just 2 times higher
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
KA
S1
60
00
NK
*
RU
10
00
0B
S*
RU
10
00
0B
S*
CN
5X
I
CZ
12
00
JM*
DE
30
0O
W
DE
13
00
SA
*
DE
16
00
MV
P
DK
52
8F
U
FR
15
0B
I
FR
20
0C
HB
S*
FR
23
0P
ICB
HU
11
5N
GP
HU
11
00
TC
PL
20
00
ST
*
RO
60
0T
R*
SE
33
5S
K
SE
55
0L
AV
UK
25
5E
A
UK
44
0S
UF
F
UK
80
0C
AM
*
AU
S3
00
0W
A
AU
S5
00
0W
A*
ZA
20
43
SA
CA
18
00
LB
BR
19
5P
R
BR
13
00
MT
US
07
00
IA
US
90
0N
D
RU
10
00
0B
S*
HU
11
5N
GP
HU
11
00
TC
IT4
3E
R
RO
60
0T
R*
EAST EU SH NA SH NA EA EU
Rapeseed Soybeans Sunflower
Seeds Nitrogen Phosphate Potash Herbicide Fungicide Insecticide Other pesticide
Isermeyer
Summary (I)
Global commodity prices will go up again when global economy recovers.
All somewhat suitable arable land will be in use in order to cope with global demand.
Even with higher prices entrepreneurial challenge remains the same: Do things right, and do right things.
agri benchmark: global comparison of production systems, framework conditions and competitiveness
Isermeyer
Summary (II)
Rapeseed is facing major challenges, especially from an EU perspective.
Western European rapeseed production has higher cost than Overseasor Eastern rapeseed production.
Some cost components will be reduced, if policy support for EU agriculture is reduced (land cost) and/or EU farms get bigger (operating costs, partly).
Other disadvantages may even increase (better quality and higher yields through GMO in America and Asia, both in soy and rapeseed?)
Compared to soybean production, fertilizer and plant protection cost of rapeseed production are considerably higher.
Remember: Until now, we only have “first results”, with many open questions remaining
Interested to participate? Please contact www.agribenchmark.org