International Comparative Research in Health Care

27
International Comparative Research in Health Care A straightforward exercise? Koen Putman

description

International Comparative Research in Health Care. A straightforward exercise ?. Koen Putman. How are we doing ?. ( Inter ) national research. EU- Funding (CORDIS). Challenges. Securing comparability Accounting for national variations Finding the data. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of International Comparative Research in Health Care

Page 1: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

International Comparative Research in Health Care

A straightforward exercise?

Koen Putman

Page 2: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

How are we doing?

Page 3: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care
Page 4: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

(Inter)national research

Page 5: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

EU-Funding (CORDIS)

Page 6: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Challenges

  Securing comparability  Accounting for national variations  Finding the data

In: Burau, Curr Socio, 2012

Page 7: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Health systems dynamics

In: van Olmen et al., Health Cult & Society, 2012

Page 8: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Garrido et al., in:HSREPP, 2011

Page 9: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

UZ Pellenberg

Queen’s Medical CentreCity Hospital

RehaClinic Zurzach

Fachklinik Herzogenaurach

Page 10: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Admission policies in SRUSRU-GB1 SRU-GB2 SRU-BE1 SRU-BE2 SRU-CH SRU-DE

Factors related to the patientphysical condition ++ +

cognitive abilities + + + +behavioural aspects + + + +patient’s network +

Factors related to the network between facilitiesaffiliations + + +health insurance ++

other SRUs in recruitment area + ++

Factors related to referring hospitalsacute stroke unit + + +absence of bed managers +

In: Putman K et al., J Rehabil Med, 2006

Page 11: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

total therapy physio-therapy

occupationaltherapy

speechtherapy

neuro.training nursing care medical care sports autonomexercise

other therapy

time

(min

.)

PellenbergNottinghamZurzachHerzogenaurach

Absolute time in therapeutic activities between7.00am and 5.00 pm

*

* significant difference after correction for case-mixDe Wit et al., Stroke, 2005

Process of care

*

*

Page 12: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

BE UK CH DEphysiotherapy 3.94 7.35 10.54 4.90

occupational therapy 2.24 4.06 5.69 2.56

PT+OT 6.18 11.41 16.23 7.46

speech therapy 1.30 1.35 1.52 1.10neuropsychology 0.57 0.49 1.71 1.70medical care 2.33 3.31 2.28 3.07nursing care 20.76 52.98 19.00 13.80

other therapy 0.77 0.00 2.24 3.14

TOTAL 31.91 69.54 42.98 30.27

Time available per patient per week/professional group

beds#hrs/week x workingstaff FTE#

De Wit et al., Stroke, 2005

Page 13: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

use of care after discharge (6m)

Putman et al., J Rehab Med, 2007

Page 14: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Challenges

  Securing comparability  Accounting for national variations  Finding the data

In: Burau, Curr Socio, 2012

Page 15: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Selection of patients

Kennedy et al., Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2012

Page 16: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Incentives

Peltola et al., Cerebrovasc Dis, 2013

Page 17: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Challenges

  Securing comparability  Accounting for national variations  Finding the data

In: Burau, Curr Socio, 2012

Page 18: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

  Assessment traditions and ‘culture’Systematic collection useful for research

practice (Freeman et al., JNNP, 2005)

However: Heterogenity of outcome measurement in

Europe (Haigh et al., J Rehab Med, 2001)

example: FIM vs Barthel in stroke rehabilitation (Sangha et al. Int J Rehab Res, 2005)

Finding the data

Page 19: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

“translations”

Nyein K et al., Clin Rehab 1999

Motor FIMBarthel Index Score

Page 20: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Uniform datasets

Page 21: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

  Questionnaires– Conceptual equivalence across cultures

– e.g.: socio-economic status– Pre-study on possible answering categories

– e.g.: discharge destination, post-discharge services

– Translations of questionnaires

Finding the data

Page 22: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Ethics

Chaudhry et al., Clin Trials, 2013

Page 23: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Methodological challenges

In: Horn S et al. , Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2012

Page 24: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Priorities future research

Page 25: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

Recommendations

  Inclusion of evidence in reimbursement regulations on provision of services (Weinrich et al., 2011)

  “Chain of care” (Ringelstein et al, 2013)

  Quality indicators/national audits (Ringelstein et al, 2013)

  Comparative effectiveness research

Page 26: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

No stereotyping

  In Hell:  the cooks are English,  the policemen are German,  the mechanics are French,  the lovers are Swiss  and  the bankers are Italian.

  In Heaven:  the cooks are French,  the policemen are English,  the mechanics are German,  the lovers are Italian  and  the bankers are Swiss.

  And what about the Belgians?

Page 27: International  Comparative  Research in Health Care

International Comparative Research in Health Care

A straightforward exercise?

Koen Putman

[email protected]@uclan.ac.uk