UNIT AIdentifying and analysing a need or problem:

The inside of the Haydon School Library isn’t very appealing or enticing due to the plain and dull colour scheme. In addition the layout of the room isn’t appealing due to the geometric tables and shelves which doesn’t appeal to the users of ages 11-18 or to the modern day. This doesn’t entice students to use the library or its resources and therefore the different ways of learning and studying is decreased. In addition, the students that would prefer to work in a quite, undisturbed place would most likely not want to work in the library due to its dull atmosphere and this doesn’t make learning fun.The inside layout and design of the library would need to be improved so that it is more exciting, enticing and fun and so that there are several ways to learn, study and work within the space provided, not only for the students but for the staff as well.The Sign outside the Library would also need to be improved so that it matches the new design within the inside of the Library and so that the Library is made even more appealing. The sign should also advertise the use of the Library and make students want to enter.

Supporting the need:

The need to re-design the Haydon School Library is clearly shown. I conducted a survey to ask a range of Haydon school students what they thought about the current Library and whether they thought it needed a change: ‘The majority of students asked never entered the Library unless they had a lesson. All the 6th formers asked, used the Library for revising and many of the younger years used the Library for lessons, but weren’t encouraged to go in any other time. One person thought the Library had an old fashioned style and another said the Library wasn’t fun to look at and it was too uniform. However, one person did comment that the layout of the Library was clear. Someone thought that the bookshelves and tables were not in exciting positions and were not suited to there function of finding books. When asked about the colour scheme of the Library, the majority of students said the colours were boring, dull and not complimenting. It was too plain and not modern enough.’ This survey shows that the interior of the Library needs to be changed due to the appearance of the Library not thought to be complimenting or exciting due to the atmosphere, layout and dull colours. If the Library was more exciting then the majority of students asked said they would re-consider entering the Library more often.

An article found on the internet, asked the thoughts of a professional Graphic designer what he thought about Libraries in general. Michael Bierut (CreativeReview.co.uk) commented that “libraries were innately boring, and thus needed to be entirely rebranded.” He also commented that if Library designs were made more exciting it would “encourage library use.” This shows that the more exciting and enticing the inside of the Library is – its layout and design – the more likely it is that students are to enter, which would be true for Haydon school.

In a second internet article found (howtodothings.com), Patricia Diaz gave her personal view on Libraries. She commented that “Libraries are places for learning. If you have a library, it is important that the space is cozy and warm.” She also said that “A library is not necessarily a boring place. With the right design (and decoration), it can turn into a comfortable place …” This shows that Libraries depend on its space and design to encourage people to use it. Making the space more enticing encourages students to enter and therefore learn. The students at Haydon School think that the Library is a boring place to be in, due to its boring design, and because they are the main target group to use the space it is important that the Library is changed to encourage more students to use it.

Design Brief

The Haydon School Library has the need to be re-designed due to its lack of use by students and its lack of appeal to students. It has been asked of me to re-design the inside of the Library, including both its colour scheme, styles and layout to entice more students to use the Library more regularly. It also needs to be designed for the major purpose of learning, to enable students not just to learn, but to learn in a fun, exciting and modern environment. The interior of the Library should be designed not only to appeal to the students of ages 11-18, but to also allow the teaching and Librarian staff to use the designed area also. The Library must include a range of materials, suitable for its function, and must also be suitable for the structure, style and form of the layout also. I am to analyse and develop design ideas for the new Library Interior and must eventually manufacture a model of the interior as well.

Target Market/Client

The Haydon School Library is open to every student within the school, which includes both genders of ages 11-18. However, there would be certain people who would use the Library more than others. These would be students who want to learn and study, who would use the Library to borrow books,research and read. This is the whole purpose of the Library. However, I must re-design the Library so it is appealing not just to those who want to learn,but to other students as well, to encourage others to use the Library as well and therefore encourage more students to learn through it. The students who would use the Library more than others would be the younger ages of 11-12 who would most likely use the Library to borrow books for reading or for project research. The 6th formers (ages 16-18) would also be more likely to use it more than the rest of the school due to their increased time ofstudying and research, and the increased amount of time that they have free to use the Library.The students that are to use the Library would be consciences of working and learning and would want to do well in life. They would have the desire togo onto university and/or get a good job at the end of it all. They would use the Library for learning and revising mostly. The younger years would be more interested in doing well in school, whereas the 6th formers and year 11’s would be concentrated on what they want to go on to do after education. This affects how I design the Library layout and what is within the Library – books, higher education office. However, social life would also be a very important part of life for my target market/students because the balance of work and ‘play’ is needed. They would be going out and meeting friends of their own age and having fun (the Library design may therefore be affected by what the students enjoy – designs or images. Friends and Family would be important in their life because they are not yet fully independent and need help, guidance and support.

The students would be involved in the modern world of technology – mobiles, internet etc. and these objects would also be an important part of their life, the older years more than the younger. The students would be interested in modern styles and modern fashion/image and this is an important part of their identity also. This would affect the designs and styles I would incorporate within the Library. The modern styles would probably attract the modern styles of the students.

Most of the students would be friendly and approachable, especially the 6th formers who would be more mature which would affect the colours, styles and designs of the Library.

Target Market/ClientTo the left is a mood board showing the colours, styles, patterns and interests of the Target Market (students aged 11-18). This will help me to understand what colour schemes and styles my Target Market prefer so when it comes to designing the interior of the Library, I could include some of these styles and colours within. The colours, styles and the Library itself would therefore appeal to the Target Market.

UNIT A

The designs may need to be more mature for the older years, but exciting enough to also entice the younger years. Most of the students entering the Library would be calm and willing to learn and therefore the colours schemes may be effected. The colours may need to be calm and relaxing, to relieve the stress of work of the students.

Users

NeedsWantsDesiresStylesAgeClientsHow they use the spaceFunction

OpinionsIdeasInvolvementHow often they use the spaceWhyInterested inLifestyleMoods

TASK ANALYSISUNIT A

Function

SilenceReadingFinding booksReading BooksStudyingRevisingLessonsTeam workRelaxed learning

ConnexionsUsing ComputersComfortable sittingLibrarian working spaceDesksUse of spaceClear layouts

Materials

WoodPlasticCompositesCarpetWallpaper/paintFlooringTablesComponentsQuantity

PerformanceCostsSustainabilityPurposeComplimentUsersEase of use/comfortEasy to work with/build

Aesthetics

PleasingUser needsStylesColoursLayoutUniformedSymmetricGeometricAbstractModern

ComplimentRelaxedClients interestsFunctionUse of space and stylesAll agesSizeDimensions

Environmental Issues

SustainabilityGlobal WarmingAble to be recycled, reusedMaterialsLastingToughHard wearing

CostsEnergy involvedHow well looked afterWasted materials

Size

DimensionsFitsErgonomicsAnthropometricsCostsMaterialsAvailability

Ease of use/movementSafetyHow many components (E.g. Books)AestheticsComponents and LibraryIndependent/dependant

Time constraints and costs

Time to buildTime to designEasy/difficultTasksVariety of tasksVariety of materialsDeadlinesLabour time and costsCosts of materials

AvailabilityQuantitySizesTotal costsIndividual costsFunctionTools and equipment

Sources of Research

InternetBooksResearchClientsTarget marketsUsersStudentsWorkersTesting

Teachers LibrariansPrimary researchSecondary ResearchOpinionsSurveysQuestionnairesEvaluating

Styles

ExcitingColour schemesPatternsLayoutsModernSuit the target marketRelaxed

WallsFloorsComponents – tables, shelvesComplimentsAesthetically pleasingClients interests

Quality Control

TestingManufactureDesignPlanningInspectionDimensionsSamplingQuality checksErgonomics

PrintingColour consistencyComplimentColour schemesAccurate styles/patternsLayoutPerformance of componentsUse of Library space

Safety

Safe DesignSafe LayoutEye strain

ColoursMaterialsManufactureSafety when using computers to design

DesignersUsers of LibraryDecreased strainComfortable use

Structure and Stability

SafetyUseAmount of useMaterialsReliabilityToughHard wearing

Properties of materialsUse/structure of spaceStability of componentsJointsStability of layout of Library

Quality of Finish

ComplimentStylesLayoutColour schemesInterestingAppealingSmooth finishesMaterialsAestheticsDimensionsAccuracyTestingUser thoughtsArrangements

This adds to the atmosphere of the section and the children would want to read more and therefore pick up the books. This also adds to the function. The random lines within the text are unique and also grab a Childs attention.The overall appearance of the Library is aesthetically pleasing. The different sections (due to the different types of books) are logically laid out (and are pleasing to look at), with the bookshelves arranged in a geometric, square form. They face inwards towards the centre square area between the bookshelves. The space in this area is used well, with tables, computers and chairs which allow the user to use the space provided. The adult section also has the bookshelves arranged linear with isle’s which is more formal and allows more bookshelves and therefore books to be available. The quality of finish is professional and neat due to the clean colours and clean area. The area used isn’t too busy which adds to the relaxed feel. This gives an aesthetically pleasing look.

FeaturesThere are added features to Ruislip Library that make it more attractive. For example, there are posters within the Children's section of the Library that are bright and colourful, which grab a Childs attention but also advertise a book also. Within the adult section there are photographs hanging from the ceiling above the bookshelves. These are of natural animals which are obviously above the nature or fictional genre books. These are presented very aesthetically due to the dark, plain frame and glass. This adds to the modern style of the Library and gives a clean cut effect. It also draws the user in. The labelled bookshelves allow the user to find the type of books they prefer easily and quickly. These labels are fairly simple and do not appeal to the younger or student ages. This is therefore why these labels are within the adult section. The white background and black, sharp and squared text is simple and doesn't distract from the other colours and styles within the area. They inform the user, so have a good function, but not such a good form.The extra feature of the Cafe at the back of the Library entices people into the Library also. People, especially teenagers like to socialize, and a cafe is a great way to do this. This draws the users of the

Library within, also allowing them to use the Library too. The Cafe also gives a relaxed feel and style.

AnthropometricsThe anthropometrics of the Ruislip Library where well thought out. The tables and chairs were a lot smaller within the children’s section than in the other sections. This is obviously due to children (under 10) being a lot shorter and therefore needing smaller sized components and proportions. The bookshelves were also a lot lower so the smaller children could reach the top shelves. The older books (age 10) were on the top shelves and the younger books where on the bottom shelves. This was so the different average heights could reach the correct books.The chairs and tables in the adult sections where larger and had longer legs due to users over 12 having longer legs and being taller. This allowed for easy and comfortable use. The bookshelves where also taller, approx being about 2m in height. This allows the average person being able to view and reach the top shelves. The isle between the bookshelves were also wide enough for approx 4 people. This allows ease of mobility and so is

Safety and ReliabilityThe Library was very safe and reliable due to the clear and simple layout. The area wasn’t too busy with other components, such as chairs, and therefore users were unlikely to fall over or hurt themselves. The children's area was also very safe due to the cushioned chairs and smooth wood with rounded edges/corners. This prevented any minor injuries. The isle between the bookshelves were wide enough so even if the Library was busy, it was hard to fall over someone else and there was enough room to move. The surfaces of each component, including the bookshelves had very smooth edges (mainly due to the laminated surfaces) and each component was fitted with nuts, bolts or permanent glues for stability. This prevented the collapse of any chairs and tables, also preventing injuries.

PRODUCT ANALYSISProduct AnalysisRuislip Manor Library has recently been refurbished. This includes a new style, layout and redecoration. The Library includes bookshelves, tables, chairs and computers in a clear layout. There is also an entrance hall, reception area and a cafe, which all add to the function of the Library. The......... Advertises the Library and lets people know what the building is used for and it entices users to walk inside.

FunctionRuislip Manor library is aimed at people of all ages due to the variety of books and the different sections within. The Library is aimed at allowing people to search for books, research or read in a quiet and relaxed atmosphere. This is achieved through the soft, pale colours and styles used. This Library is modern and the large windows to the front don’t just add to the modern style but also let a lot of light through to enhance the quiet atmosphere and subtle colours. The light also allows the area behind them to appear a lot larger than it actually is which gives a spacious, calm and relaxed feeling. This enhances the users feelings and automatically allows the Library to be calm and respected. The Library should also allow people to search for books easily, enabling them to find the books they want easily and quickly, which is done through the clear and logical layout of the bookshelves and different sections.

Aesthetics and stylesRuislip Manor Library has a modern style due to the pale and subtle colours, not only within the wallpaper, but also within the pale wood colour used. The pale colouring of the walls and components gives a relaxed atmosphere and complements its function. The floor however gives variety to the subtle colours as this is a striped green/grey colour which brightens up the room. However, this isn’t a young modern style as it isn’t interesting or exciting and gives a fairly dull mood, so within my own Library design I wouldn’t choose the same colour floor. The striped pattern however is interesting and unique.The children's section within the Library has text on the back wall which grabs the users attention and isinteresting to look at. It

gives a variety of pattern also. The text is bold yet simple. The letters are large and very clear to read due to the simple square form, which is ideal for children as they would be able to read it better.

Materials or Components Why selected and Useful Properties Alternatives Environmental and Sustainability

IssuesWallpaper

“Vinyl Coated Paper”

(Vinyl) coated wallpaper is very durable as it is very resistant to grease and moisture. This is ideal due to the amount of people that use the Library and the many hands being placed on the walls. This type of paper is also able to be cleaned easily and is also strippable, for easy applying and taking away from the wall. This is suitable for the Library where the style and patterns may need to be changed quite often and therefore the ease of removing the wallpaper decreases time and labour costs.

Paint could be used instead of wallpaper because the colours available would be brighter and a more variety of patterns could be printed. However, paint isn’t as durable as it can be scratched off the wall a lot easier and it isn’t as resistant to grease and dirt. In addition, it isn’t as aesthetically pleasing.

In order to get the wallpaper, deforestation will have to occur. This spoils the environment and damages animal habitats, leading to a decreased ecosystem and biodiversity. However, new trees can be replanted to replace the ones being cut down.

Bookshelves and Chairs

“Blockboard/Laminboard”

Block board wood was used for the Bookshelves within the Ruislip Library. This is strips of softwood which are glued together, side by side, and sandwiched between 2 veneers. This adds strength to the wood and makes the board look a lot nicer and more aesthetically pleasing. The veneer also gives a smooth surface finish, adding to the safety, especially in the Children's area. This type of wood is also relatively inexpensive, saving costs for the Library in other areas. Thicker board can be produced from Blackboard, making the bookshelves more reliable and stronger. Block board also comes in any size, so large pieces of wood could be ordered making the manufacturing of the Bookshelves a lot easier.

Plywood could be used as an alternative because this is also very strong, due to the layers being glued with their grain at 90 degrees to each other. However, this is slightly more expensive than Block board.Chipboard could also have been used because this is very inexpensive, however its not very strong so wouldn’t be as durable. A softwood, such as Pinewood, could have been used on its own because this is fairly strong and durable and easy to work with and also gives a smooth and aesthetically pleasing finish. However, it’s slightly more expensive and large sizes aren’t available.

Deforestation will have to occur to get the wood. This spoils the environment and damages animal habitats, leading to a decreased ecosystem and biodiversity. However, new trees can be replanted to replace the ones being cut down.

Leaflet holder and Bookshelf

signs“Rigid

Polystyrene”

Rigid polystyrene would have been used for the leaflet/book holders within the entrance hall and within the Library itself, and also for the bookshelf signs. Rigid polystyrene is transparent which allows the books and leaflets to be visible. It is also rigid and lightweight, making the holder easier to transport but durable at the same time, and less likely to break. It is versatile so this polystyrene would have been made thicker so it wouldn’t snap or break as easily and therefore it would last longer.

Acrylic could have been used as an alternative because it is aesthetically pleasing due to the bright colours and smooth surface finish that it has. It is easily moulded also and quite durable with stress. However, it is also very brittle and therefore would not last as long.

Plastics come from oil or crude oil which is a non-renewable resource and is therefore not sustainable. The extraction of oil and manufacturing the plastic uses a lot of energy and releases harmful gases into the atmosphere including Carbon Dioxide, a green house gas, which contributes to global warming. Rigid polystyrene can be recycled which saves resources, energy and money, however it can be difficult to sort out the correct plastics to be recycled.

Advertising/children’s

poster Boards“Coated printing paper”

Coated Printing paper would have been used for the poster because it gives a very smooth surface finish due to the china clay, pigment and adhesive coating. This coating levels the minute pits between the fibres in the base paper. This allows the paper to have a high quality and professional appearance (advertising the books well). This paper is also durable and strong, due to its thickness of 150gsm. The coating allows dirt and grease to be wiped off easily and also protects the printing. The Coated paper was mounted onto thin (3-4mm) MDF wood or mount board to allow for easy application to the wall, to flatten out the paper and to make it more durable, preventing the paper from being torn. However Coated paper is relatively expensive.

Solid white Carton board could have been used instead because this is very strong and rigid, making it more durable than Coated paper. Solid white board also has an excellent printing surface, ideal for advertising books and reading to anyone of any age. It would be aesthetically pleasing. However, this carton board is expensive and is normally only used for packaging. Cartridge paper could have been used as an alternative also because even though it doesn’t have as smooth a surface as Coated paper it does still have a smooth surface (with a slight texture – adds variety). However, it isn’t as aesthetically pleasing as Coated paper and doesn’t have as good a printing surface.

In order to get the paper, deforestation would have to occur. This destroys animal habitats and isn’t visually pleasing. Deforestation can also disturb locals. However, new trees can be replanted to replace the ones being cut down, not only saving resources but also saving the environment.

PRODUCT ANALYSIS

By analysing Ruislip Library it will help me to begin designing. By analysing the different aspects of the Library (such as the styles and materials) it has made me aware of what styles and colours work best for the type of atmosphere needed. I have noticed that the soft and subtle colours of the Ruislip Library give a relaxed feel, however the modern style and light colours of the components within the Library make it more modern, which appeals to students in a school. However, I have also found that the colours are too plain and not exciting enough for students, and therefore perhaps a more variety of colours are needed for my own design. I have also found out what anthropometrics work best, due to Ruislip Library being quite successful. This will allow me to see what sizes of components would work best for my own Library design. This is the same for the layout and ease of use of the Ruislip Library and how the space is used. I thought that the space was used very successfully in Ruislip due to the logical layout and aesthetically pleasing layout and style. By analysing the materials within the Ruislip Library I have been able to see why each material works best and how each material suits its purpose and why it was selected. I have analysed the alternatives also so I have a range of ideas for my own design and I can compare each material to see which would work best within my own design. On the following page I have also analysed a few manufacturing processes that were used within the Ruislip Library. This allows me to understand what processes work best for different components and why. I have also found that finishing processes make the Library more effective and attractive and this would therefore attract students within a school. Some alternatives were also suggested which allows me to compare each process against the other which enables me to understand which would work best within my own Library design and why. This would lead to a successful and enticing Haydon School Library design for students ages 11-18.

PRODUCT ANALYSISARCHITECTURAL MODEL

• Analysing an architectural model will allow me to see what materials work best, functionally and aesthetically, so that I can use similar or the same materials within my own scaled down, architectural model of the Haydon School Library. My own model will then show a clear representative of what the Library would look like in reality if my design were to be used.Several processes and materials were used to produce this architectural model of a florist. The structure of the Florist – the white walls - were produced from MDF wood because this material has consistent strength in all directions, because it has no grain. This means it doesn’t split, therefore making it more durable. No grain also means that the wood is easier to cut, using a scroll saw, and is easier to shape and smooth. MDF is also less expensive, keeping costs low. The MDF was painted white because this makes the wood more aesthetically pleasing and realistic. Paint also protects the MDF wood underneath, making it more durable and lasting longer.• The purple stalls within the shop/model were produced from PP because its lightweight and rigid, therefore less likely to snap. PP is aesthetically pleasing and impact resistant, therefore lasting longer. The shape of the stalls were created through Vacuum Forming because this process is inexpensive and the moulds are relatively easy to create, therefore saving time. However, large amounts of waste is produced, which isn’t

sustainable. Clear Acrylic was used for the shelves, lid and entrance divider of the model. This allows the user to view the architectural model from above, giving another perspective. This shows the viewer what it would look like it reality. Acrylic is aesthetically pleasing and durable, therefore lasting longer. Acrylic is easy to shape and therefore can be created easily and quickly, saving time. However, Acrylic is brittle and has a low scratch resistance. The creator of this model has overcome this brittleness however by producing the acrylic is smaller sizes, therefore less likely to break. • Purple Acrylic was used for the signage at the front of the shape for the same reasons as above. The design of this sign was created using the laser cutter, ‘carving’ the design onto the Acrylic. This is a quick and very accurate process, therefore saving time. However colours are not produced, therefore making it less aesthetically pleasing. • The ‘wooden’ and black floor, and the purple flower wallpaper was produced from a (Solid) White board material, because this is very strong and rigid, therefore creating a durable floor that represents reality well. The wooden pattern was printed onto the carton board to represent wood. Solid White board also has an excellent printing surface, adding to the quality of the model. However, this material is expensive.

• A variety of different joints were used within the wooden structure of the model. The joints give strength to the structure and make it aesthetically pleasing. The following joints were used: Cross halving, butt joints and lap joints. These all provide permanent joining, therefore creating a strong and durable structure. Apart from the butt joint, the other joints increase the gluing area of the joints, therefore making the joints even stronger. They are also aesthetically pleasing as they add to the pattern and style of the design.

Below shows a Plan Drawing of the current Haydon School Library. The current wall and window structures are shown. When I begin designing, I will use this plan to help me design the layout within the space available. The dimensions are also included so everything is in proportion. When I begin designing the layout with tables and bookshelves, these can then also be in proportion. This will make the design realistic. In addition, I can design the layout with the correct ergonomics involved, which will allow the Library to function properly.

The Haydon school Library has many uses. I have added labels onto the diagram below to show how the Library is used. This will also me to see how much space I need, to provide the function of certain aspects. For example, there needs to be a couple of tables that seat at least 30 pupils in total. This will then provide space for lessons that are carried out within the Library on a regular basis. 6 other (6 seated) tables are used within the Library (within the larger, main section below) for individual study and reading. In addition, these tables are moved around and positioned differently for events such as parents evening, that occur at least once every term. Therefore my design must also contain tables that are transportable, and the layout must allow room for these events to happen. The door to the computer room must be easily accessible, as lessons occur within at least 4 times per day. The staff within the Library are always using their given area, and therefore this must also be kept within my own design, to allow them to...

RESEARCHKEY

Black – Wall structuresPink – Windows and DoorsOrange – Teachers Desk

Yellow – RadiatorsBlue – Dimensions

10mm = 1m

...carry out their daily jobs with enough space. Currently, there are 9 large bookshelves (including the smaller ones also), that are the dimensions of 590mm x 4500mm, with a height of approx 2000mm. The bookshelves have 5 shelves in total and hold approx 200-400 books on each bookshelf (with extra space available.) The bookshelves are spilt into topic areas, for example one bookshelf contains books for science, and another for History. In my design I would also need to have different sections for each topic area. There are approx 5 small leaflet holders. Lastly, the entrance to the Library has security beepers to prevent students from stealing books.

Computer Room

Staff Office

Bookshelves

5 tables

Bookshelves

Leaflet Holder

TableTeachers Desk and Area

Bookshelves

Tables

Table

Leaflet Holder

Security Beepers

RESEARCHOn the next few slides, I have carried out some secondary research on the Anthropometrics of the human body. This will allow me to design the layout of the Library including thesedimensions. For example, the width between the isle

needs to be wide enough for the average person to walk down with ease. The Library will then function realistically and the students will use the space with ease and without injury. This takes into account the ergonomics also.

UNIT A QUESTIONNAIRE

RedYel

lowOran

ge PinkPurple

Dark blue

Light b

lue

Turqiose

Green

Lime

Brown

Biege

Black

White GreyCrea

mOther Mix

01234567

2. Prefered colour scheme

Plain Patterned I02468

101214

3. Prefered Design - Patternedor Plain

Geometric Abstract i02468

101214

4. Prefered Shape - Geometric or Abstract

11-13 14-15 16-17 180123456789

10

1. Students Age

Staff Student0

5

10

15

20

25

Student or Staff?

Modern Architectural i02468

1012141618

5. Prefered Styles - Modern or Old Architectural?

Series1Series2

Paint Wallpaper Panels0

2

4

6

8

10

12

6. Prefered Wall Finishing?

Wood Carpet i02468

10121416

7. Prefered Flooring?

Woo

d

Pain

ted

woo

d

Varn

ished

woo

d

Plas

tic (c

olou

red)

Met

al

Man

ufac

ture

d bo

ards

Vene

ered

man

. bo

ards

Oth

er

0

4

8

12

16

8. Prefered Materials for Ap-pearance?

Phot

ogra

phs

Cart

oon

imag

es

Sket

ched

/dra

wn

imag

es

i02468

101214

9. Prefered Display Types (e.g on walls?)

Black and white

Sepia Colour i0

2

4

6

8

10

12

9a. Prefered Style of Display (see graph before?)

Roun

ded

Geo

met

ric/s

quar

ed

Bubb

le

Curle

y

Calig

raph

y

Slan

ted

Sim

ple

Wid

e

Thin

Chun

ky

Oth

er

0123456789

10

10. Prefered Style of Fonts/Letter-ing?

Below are the results of the questionnaire I conducted, in the form of graphs. I asked in total 35 people to fill out this questionnaire so I could gather a range of results that were reliable. I asked both students and teachers because both are my clients due to the fact that both students and staff will be using the Library. However, I gathered more students

results because they are my target market and they will be using the Library most. In the graphs, the darker colour bars on each graph represents the students, and the

lighter shades of colour the staff results.

In general you can see that the staff have very different opinions, likes and interests to the students. This could be because of the age difference. When looking at the questionnaires, I noticed that most sixth formers (16-18) preferred very different styles and colours to the younger years. They preferred sophisticated and older designs, for example Old architectural designs, wood floors and abstract shapes. This shows the difference interests and styles, however I would have to choose styles and colours that would suit both older and younger years.

From the questionnaire people put several different colours they liked. Some of the different liked colours were Dark blue, light blue and white; Red and white; Purple, Dark blue and Black. These are interesting colour compliments, and I will consider these when designing the Library. Also looking at the questionnaire I could see that most people that chose Photographs as their preferred display types, preferred these in colour. The majority of people that preferred cartoon images or sketched images preferred these to be in black and white or sepia. I will take this into account when designing so that I know what type of styles and colours people prefer with different types of images. The Library has to attract students aged 11-18, so I must take many of these questionnaire results into account when designing the Library so that their styles, likes and interests are represented within the design. This would encourage them to use the Library more.

Increased Decreased Same amount0

2

4

6

8

10

12

11. According to the Current Haydon Li-brary, would you prefer there to be an

increased or decreased amount of work-ing space for the students? (Compared to

the current amount of space - 2/3 ap-prox)

Student or Staff?

1 le

ss la

rge

tabl

e

2 le

ss la

rge

tabl

es

3 le

ss la

rge

tabl

es

4 le

ss la

rge

tabl

es

5+ le

ss la

rge

tabl

es 0

0.51

1.52

2.5

11a. If decreased, how much by approx?

1 more large table 2 more large tables 3 more large tables0

1

2

3

4

5

6

11b. If increase, how much by approx?

Increased Decreased Same amount02468

101214

12. According to the Current Haydon Library, would you prefer there to be an increased or decreased amount of bookshelves currently present? (Compared to the current amount

which is approx 14 high bookshelves)1

less

boo

kshe

lf

2 le

ss b

ooks

helv

es

3 le

ss b

ooks

helv

es

4 le

ss b

ooks

helv

es

5+ le

ss b

ooks

helv

es

00.5

11.5

22.5

12a. If decrease, how much by approx?

1 m

ore

book

shel

f

2 m

ore

book

shel

ves

3 m

ore

book

shel

ves

4 m

ore

book

shel

ves

5+ m

ore

book

shel

ves0

2

4

6

12b. If increased, how much by approx?

Larg

er

Smal

ler

Sam

e am

ount

0123456789

13. Staff Only - Would you prefer there to be a larger or smaller

amount of working space for Staff?

Wor

k ta

bles

and

cha

irs

Book

shel

ves

Wal

ls

Floo

rs

Layo

ut

Win

dow

s

Doo

rs

Wor

k sp

ace

Com

pute

rs

0

4

8

12

14. Areas of the Library that work well?

Wor

k ta

bles

and

cha

irs

Book

shel

ves

Wal

ls

Floo

rs

Layo

ut

Win

dow

s

Doo

rs

Wor

k sp

ace

Com

pute

rs

0

2

4

6

8

15. Areas of the Library that don't work so well?

A se

ction

ed re

adin

g ar

ea

A pa

rticu

lar d

iscus

ion

area

A be

an b

ag/r

elax

ing

area

A pa

rticu

lar h

omew

ork

area

An in

form

ative

le

aflet

/bro

chur

e st

and

A fe

w c

ompu

ters

that

any

one

is ab

le to

use

at a

ny ti

me

Non

e of

the

abov

e

All o

f the

abo

ve

05

101520

16. Which would you most like to see within the Library area?

A se

ction

ed re

adin

g ar

ea

A pa

rticu

lar d

iscus

ion

area

A be

an b

ag/r

elax

ing

area

A pa

rticu

lar h

omew

ork

area

An in

form

ative

le

aflet

/bro

chur

e st

and

A fe

w c

ompu

ters

that

any

one

is ab

le to

use

at a

ny ti

me

Non

e of

the

abov

e

All o

f the

abo

ve

02468

1012

17. Which would be most helpful/useful within the Library area?

These questions ask people what areas they think work well within the Library, what improvements they think could be made and any additional items that could be included within the Library. This has allowed me to see what works well and what doesn’t according to the users. This is important because these are the people that would be using the Library and so I have to design the Library according to what they think work well so they would use the Library more often and so the Library functions properly. The last 2 questions have the same answer brackets but one asks which would be preferred and one asks which would be most useful. This allows me to see both the likes of the target users so I could include these within the Library, but also what would be most helpful also so the Library offers the students everything they need. The results are very different for each. It has been shown that most students would like to see a beanbag/relaxing area, however most feel that this wouldn’t be as useful as having a particular homework area within the Library. I would like to design the Library so that it includes useful things within it to help students learn, study and read best and all these results help me to see what styles, colours, patterns and objects would entice the users within the Library more often.

The interior of the Haydon School Library must…

Function• Perform its function successfully. The Library needs to provide an area to study. It must allow students to work and study and must encourage relaxed learning. Students must be able to search for books easily and quickly.• Be a suitable area to work/study. The area must allow approx 50 students to sit (at tables) and study within the Library at one time. 30 of these seats must be positioned close together to allow a 30 student class/lesson to use the Library for a lesson. • Must contain bookshelves, tables and chairs. There should be an approx area of 4x13m for bookshelves – including spaces between each bookshelf. There should be enough shelf area to contain approx……..books. • Must contain an area for working staff. The current teachers office should be kept, and there must be a desk that the staff can use, approx 2m long. An area of 2x3m, outside the office, must be use for staff purposes. • The layout of the Library area must be logical to allow for easy use.

Styles and Aesthetics• The colours, patterns and styles must all compliment each other and must be aesthetically pleasing. • They must be suitable and appeal to students aged 11-18, of both genders.• They colours, patterns and styles of the Library as a whole must be suitable for an atmosphere of working as well as relaxing.•The layout of the Library must be aesthetically pleasing, exciting and appeal to the students.• The layout of the Library must also compliment the designed styles, patterns and colours of the components within the Library and the walls etc. • The shapes of products within the Library (e.g. tables) must alsocompliment the designed styles and patterns, so the Library looks together.

Size and Ergonomics (and Anthropometric data)• The Library must suit all ergonomics of the students. The average male is 1740mm tall, 450mm wide. The average female is 1650mm tall, 400mm wide. The components and layout of the Library must have dimensions that suit these human dimensions to allow comfortable and easy use. • The tables must fit at least 6 people on each. Therefore the tables must be a min length of 2500mm=2.5m • The products must be comfortable to sit on and use, therefore having the correct ergonomics suitable for an average male (see above) and being made from a soft, padded and comfortable material. • The layout of the Library must allow enough space for easy movement. For example, between the bookshelves there should be a min width of 900mm to allow a student to walk down the aisle with ease and to also allow room for stooping.

UNIT BSPECIFICATION

Features• The Library must include both a working area for students – approx 60 seats with tables. 30 of these seats must be positioned close to each other for lessons. There must also be an area of approx ...mm for working staff, including the current office.• The Library must include bookshelves that are easily accessible and the books are clearly visible. There is a need to store at least ... Books, which can easily be sectioned and separated into different topic areas. • There must also be a beanbag and reading area where the students can relax and learn at the same time. There should be approx 6 bean bags, allowing 6 students to sit and read at the same time. • At least 2 leaflet holders, of size 500 x 500mm must also be accessible within the Library.

Time constraints• The Library must be designed within the limited time given• The design mustn’t be too complicated to allow ease for technical drawings and manufacturing and allow time for quality. For example, the shapes should be easy to produce and there should be as little small arts as possible.

Possible sources of research• The designs of the Library (and the 2D sign outside the Library) must be brought together using Primary and Secondary research e.g. asking others of their opinion• Questionnaires must be used to ask people their preferences and opinions before and during the design stage. • Feedback is needed so improvements of all the designs can be made. Feedback is needed within the planning, designs, developed designs, final designs, manufacture and final prototype.

Safety• The Library must be designed to be safe, so there is limited injury risks in reality. The components must have smooth surface finishes, rounded corners and edges, and stable structures and joining. • The layout of the Library (with its components) must be safe to move around in and must therefore allow enough room for manoeuvrability. This would be done by using the ergonomic and anthropometric data of the average students (see unit A) to allow enough room for the students to use and move between furniture/components. • There must also be enough room to move around in while working or sitting at a desk so the students find it comfortable. There should be a max distance of 1480mm between each table (if there are chairs back to back) to allow students to pull out chairs, from the table also. • The components must be the correct ergonomic dimensions to prevent, for example, back injury while sitting and working within the Library. See unit A for human ergonomic data. I must apply this ergonomic data within unit A to the designs within unit C.

Quality of finish• The designs for the Library must suggest quality with precise and technical drawings. The drawings must be in proportion to give a clear representation of what the Library would look like in reality. • The layout of the Library must be attractive and precise, therefore being finished to absolute precision. Dimensions must be used within the Plan drawings. Within the perspective drawings, proportion of the layout and components is important, not only in relation with everything else in the Library, but with the eye line of the viewer (of the drawings) too.• Everything within the Library must compliment everything else, with regards to style, shape, pattern and colours. This shows quality and makes the Library attractive.

Structure, Stability and Reliability• The structure of each of the components within the Library must be so that they are stable and reliable. They must be joined permanently, with a strong joint. They must have a wide base and low height to avoid the components from falling over.• In reality the tables and chairs must be able to hold the weight of a heavy 18 year old, 180 lbs, without strain or stress. The structures must be stable. • The components (bookshelves, table, chairs) must be reliable to use and must be very durable (material wood e.g.), because they will be used constantly each day. • The layout of the Library must be stably arranged so that, for example, components aren’t propped up against each other. Shelves must be securely joined to either the walls or bookshelves so as not to cause injury (if it falls down).• The layout must ensure that components can be easily transported through the Library, without the difficulty of moving them around other components. For example, tables must be spaced widely enough apart so that chairs can be pulled out from underneath and moved around easily.

The 2D sign Positioned outside the Haydon School Library must…

Function• Perform its function successfully – it should be attractive and therefore attract students not only to the sign but entice them to use the Library too. The Sign should give a few sentences on what the Library does and why people should use it. It should include images of the Library and students using it. • It must ‘advertise’ the Haydon School Library, by doing the above.• Should be able to be read from at least 5 meters away.• The layout of the design must be logical and easy to read, with clear, simple but attractive font.

Styles and Aesthetics• The colours, styles and patterns of the sign must all compliment, relate closely and contain at least some of the designs of the inside of the Library. This includes the Library’s layout, styles, patterns and colours.• The styles, patterns, colours must also be appealing and enticing to students aged 11-18. Therefore, patterns and colours must relate closely to the patterns found within Unit A and must match the questionnaire results. The most popular colour was Turquoise, closely followed by blue and orange. • The layout and fonts used on the sign must be aesthetically pleasing and must be complimenting to the rest of the sign and the Library itself. The fonts must be simple, clear but also attractive to read. This therefore would also help the function (see above.)• The design of the sign must be simple yet attractive, with patterns, styles and colours that are preferred by the students (from questionnaire in unit A.) The design mustn't be too busy.

Size and Ergonomics (and Anthropometric data)• The sign must be large enough to catch the eye of the person that walks past the entrance of the Library. This would attract them to the Library. A suitable size would be 3000mm x 500mm.• The font must be clear, simple, readable and must be able to be read at least 5 meters away.• The sign must be produced from a lightweight material so as not to be too heavy. This allows for easy transportation.

Features• The sign must include the name of the Library or just the word Library to advertise its existence. It must also include a sentence on why the students should use the Library. • It must also include the same colours, patterns, designs or styles used within the inside of the Library, so the two aspects connect• The sign should include an image of the inside of the Library to attract students within.

Time Constraints• The sign must take the least amount of time to design and manufacture, however it must still be attractive and aesthetically pleasing. The time limit should be 3 days. The deadlines must be met.• The design must be kept simple but effective to allow ease for the design and therefore less time is needed. Designs and patterns can be taken from the interior of the Library to allow ease of designing.

Safety• The sign must be designed to be safe (in reality) so there is limited injury risks. It must have rounded corners and edges so when handled injury is prevented. The material surface and edge must be sanded smooth. • The sign must only be a max size of 3000mm x 700mm, so it can be transported and moved around fairly easily. It should be the correct ergonomic size so as not to cause back strain when carrying it around and hanging it up. (Several people will be needed however.) • The materials or backing boards of the sign must be lightweight so as not to cause back strain or injury when transporting the sign. • The sign must be safely positioned and hung up on the wall outside the Library. The joins to the wall must be permanent and very reliable/stable so as not to fall down and seriously injure someone.

Quality of finish• The designs for the sign must suggest quality with precise and technical drawings and designs. A clear representative of what the sign will look like in reality must be shown. • The layout design of the sign must be attractive and precise, therefore being finished to absolute precision. The final design must be produced using a computer software to produce the accuracy and quality. • The whole design and layout of the sign must be complimentary and must be proportional so it is aesthetically pleasing with high quality. The same styles, patterns and colours that are used within the interior of the Library should be used within the sign too.

Structure, Stability and Reliability• The materials used for the sign must be durable and reliable. This includes scratch resistance, not brittle, and must not degrade quickly – must last for a long time. • The sign must be positioned carefully, with precision and awareness, so as not to let it drop. The joins to the wall must be permanent and must be very stable and reliable, using materials that last a long time and can with stand pressure, chemical resistance, with stand pressure, consistent strength and last for a very long time with the same strength.• The structure of the sign must be so that it can be transported around with ease without falling apart. The shape and structure must allow for easy, safe and stable transportation and joining to the wall. (For example no sharp points or purposely uneven edges.)

The Architectural Model of the Designed Library, interior and exterior, must...

Function• The Architectural model must perform its function well. This includes showing the viewer/user what the Library would look like at all angles, in reality. The model must be a clear representative of the design of the Library, interior and exterior. • The model must include a representative/scaled down model of each component within my design of the Library.• The model must open up in some way to allow viewers/users to access the inside of the model (interior of Library.) This could include a removable lid or wall for example.• The model must be able to be viewed at all angles, giving the user a clear view and idea of what the Library would look like in reality.

Form• The layout and positioning of the model must be the same as the designed layout of the Library design. The proportions should all be the same and realistic.• The patterns, shapes and forms of the model must be exactly the same or very similar to the design of the Library. The forms and shapes must compliment and aesthetically pleasing.

Aesthetics, styles, colours and patterns• The model must have the same colours and styles as the design of the Library. The colours, styles and patterns must appeal to the target market of students aged 11-18, both genders.• The colours, patterns and styles must all compliment each other and must be aesthetically pleasing. • The layout of the model must be aesthetically pleasing, exciting and appeal to the students. It must be modern and patterned, which is the preferred styles, as found from the questionnaire. • The layout of the Library must also compliment the designed styles, patterns and colours of the components within the Library and the walls etc. • The shapes of products within the model must also compliment the designed styles and patterns, so the model and therefore Library looks together.

Materials• The materials must perform their function. This includes showing the viewer/user what the Library would look like in reality. The model must be a clear representative of the design of the Library. Therefore, the scaled down model, materials must be a very good representative of the materials that would be used in reality. • The materials of the model (including the interior, and sign) must be aesthetically pleasing, stable, durable and lightweight. • The materials used must compliment the designed styles of the Library/design. • The materials of the model must have a suitable finish to protect the materials and also the printed designs of the walls etc.• The materials used must be stable and durable, especially since the model would be handled and moved around a lot. • The materials must be easily accessible, in large sizes. • They must be easy to work with, shape, print on and cut. This saves time and makes it easier to produce the model accurately. • They must be relatively inexpensive

Production (Manufacturing) • The design and therefore model mustn’t be too complicated to allow ease for manufacturing and to allow time for quality. This means that there mustn't be very small, loose parts within the model. • The model of the Library design must be made accurately, with the correct dimensions and shapes, so a true perspective of the Library is shown. • The model must clearly show all areas of the new Library design and each part must be clearly visible. The model must be able to be viewed from all side and above angles. • Very similar materials that would be used within the reality Library must be used within the model.• The same colours, styles, shapes and layout that are shown within the new design of the Library must be used within the model, however scaled down.• The components within the model must be in proportion and must be secured and attached (to the base e.g.) permanently.• The model must be finished with quality so it is aesthetically pleasing and attractive. This includes smooth surfaces, and surface finishes, for example varnish or paint. This also protects the materials.

Costs• The materials used for the whole model/prototype must be relatively inexpensive, however quality is still needed.• The processes used to produce the products within the model (and in reality) must be cost effective and inexpensive.

Environmental issues• The materials used within the model must do limited amount of environmental damage. The processes to make the materials should use up little resources and must produce only very small amounts of greenhouse gases, if any. Little deforestation must be involved. • The materials must also be biodegradable or recyclable – sustainable. • The processes used to print and create the wallpaper, posters etc. must use and waste little energy and resources/materials. The processes must make minimum waste and let off minimum greenhouse gases. • The processes and materials used must be sustainable (by using the recourses well, and little of them.)• When creating the model, the waste material must either be very small or must be recyclable or reused.

Size and Scale of Production• The architectural model of the Library must be scaled down in size, to a suitable size. This provides easy transportation and allows the viewers to see what the Library would look like in reality.• A suitable, scaled down size, would be 600mm x 400mm (base).• The model must be in proportion, (dimensions), including all the components, walls and structures.• The model must be accurate, precise and of a high quality. This is therefore a one-off production (only one is going to be produced).

Time Constraints• The model must take the least amount of time to manufacture, however it must still be attractive and aesthetically pleasing. The time limit should be maximum of 4-5 weeks. The deadlines given must be met.

Time Constraints Continued• The model must be kept simple but effective, including many processes, to allow ease for the manufacture and less time.

Safety• The model must safe so there is limited risk of injury. The edges of the structure and components, must all have slight rounded corners and edges. This prevents injury when being handled. All the materials surfaces and edges must be sanded smooth. • The model must only be a max size of 700mm x 550mm, so it can be transported and moved around fairly easily. It should be the correct ergonomic size so as not to cause back strain when carrying it around. The maximum weight should be approx 10kg???• The materials must be lightweight so as not to cause back strain or injury when transporting the model. • Most of the joins or joints of the model (including components) must be permanent and very reliable/stable so as not to fall appart and seriously injure someone.

Stability• The materials used to produce the model must be durable and reliable. This includes being scratch resistant, not brittle, and must last for a long time (not rot or degrade quickly.) • Most of the joints and joins of the model (including all the components and structure), must be permanent – except for those that allow the viewer to view the model, e.g. The lid. The joins and joints must be stable, reliable and strong, using materials that last a long time and those that can with stand pressure, chemical resistance and they must have consistent strength. • The structure of the model must be so that it can be transported around with ease without falling apart. The shapes and structures must allow for easy and safe transportation. (For example no sharp points or uneven edges.) • The different parts of the model must be able to hold certain weights of other materials, e.g. The walls must hold the lid and the sign. This must be done without stress or strain.• The model must be easily transported, without difficulty. One person should be able to carry it on their own. The max weight of the model should be approx 10 kg.

Quality of Finish• The model must be made to a high quality, with accuracy and precision. The model must be a clear representative of what the Library would look like in reality. Therefore the materials used must be similar and the layout clearly seen. • The layout, design and colours of the model must all be complimentary and aesthetically pleasing. The model must also be in correct proportion. The same colours, patterns and shapes used within the design of the new Library must also be used within the model.• The materials must all have a smooth surface finish to suggest quality. In addition, the material surfaces must all have a surface finish on them, not only to protect the materials but this will be aesthetically pleasing. This links closely to the finishes within the Library that would be made in reality.

UNIT CDESIGN DEVELOPMENT

To begin to design the inside of Haydon School Library, I started by designing a variety of the components that would be included within the Library. I designed a range of different tables, bookshelves and bean bags that could be included as features within the Library to allow the layout and design to be more attractive and appealing to the target market. I designed these components according to the needs and wants of the target market and client group. This would therefore also meet the specification. The 4 tables below were starting designs for tables. These designs are very simple and are therefore not imaginative or exciting. These designs wouldn’t appeal to the students. However, the 2 bottom designs are quite abstract and would therefore be more appealing to the students than 2 top tables (according to the questionnaire).

This circular table design would be suitable for group study or work due to everyone being able to see, talk and interact with everyone else.

This square design isn’t a new design and isn’t very attractive due to its very simple geometric shape. Therefore it wouldn’t appeal to students ages 11-18, who prefer exciting, modern and abstract styles.

This table is more imaginative than the above tables. It would appeal to students within a school due to its unique form and abstract look. However, it could be difficult to sit at due to the edge not being straight.Within the model this table would be produced from MDF and would be covered with Acrylic, to create a veneered wood effect.

The smooth and streamlined form of this table is suited to a Library as it has a relaxed and quiet style due to the curved form. It is simple yet quite effective. Within the model, this table would be produced from Parana Pine, with perhaps coloured acrylic legs to give the same effect. Parana pine is strong, durable and easy to work, therefore creating the curved form easily. It has a smooth finish, adding to the quality.

Within the architectural model of the Library the square and circle table would be created from MDF because this is an excellent modelling material due to its consistent strength and its inexpensive cost. It has a smooth surface texture and would therefore be aesthetically pleasing. MDF is easily shaped, giving the circular and square shape accurately.

I then developed my ideas to give a range of new and different unique designs, for the tables within the Library. All ideas were designed to meet the target users wants and needs, and were also designed to fit the specification. Therefore the tables must be attractive, unique and interesting, therefore appealing to the target market – students aged 11-18, both genders. The tables must, as part of the whole design of the Library, entice students to use the Library more often. The tables must encourage and allow students to sit down and study quietly, in a relaxing and calm atmosphere. The tables must be large enough to fit at least 6 students around one table at a time. These tables should be comfortable and the correct anthropometric dimensions. The materials specified below are for the model only.

1. Due to its very different and unique design, this table would appeal to students aged 11-18. The shape is exciting and even though the straight edges and square form, this table is quite abstract due to its interesting shape. This table is very sociable due to the students being able to sit all around the shape and therefore talk and work with each other better. The legs of the table provide stability due to large base width and length. In the model of the Library, this table would again be produced from MDF because it has a smooth finish, therefore making it aesthetically pleasing. MDF can also be finished with paint which give vibrant and attractive colours, making the table more appealing to students.

2. This work table design represents a book. This links with the Library’s purpose and function. The design is fun and creative, however it does appeal to a younger audience and therefore wouldn’t meet the specification of appealing to all students aged 11-18. The table legs provide stability due to the wide base and connecting middle pole.

3. The form of this table is quite sophisticated and professional, and would appeal to the students. However, the slanted sides could be a problem when trying to work at the table, as books would slide off the surface. This table could be produced from an MDF top (easy to shape), with a Balsa Base and Legs as this is strong and a great modelling material.

4. The patterns of this table are decorative, however they appeal far more to the female audience and therefore doesn’t meet the specification. This table could be produced from painted plywood (to achieve the patterns) with a dowel leg because this is strong.

5. The round shape of this table isn’t unique, however the design within the table top is abstract, modern and interesting, therefore appealing to students. The whole table would be produced from acrylic. This is very modern and appeals to the younger audience. Acrylic requires no surface finish and is available in a range of exciting colours. It meets the specification. However, acrylic scratches easily and it very brittle, so care would needed to be taken. A thicker width is required to reduce the risk of cracking.

6. Both these tables would be produced from the softwood pine because it is relatively inexpensive (meeting the specification) and it is strong. It has a light colour and is therefore modern, appealing to the students and meeting the specification. There would be a layer of acrylic covering the top of the table. This would protect the pine wood itself (more durable) and it gives variety. The squared patterns within the table (seen as outlines) would be produced from coloured acrylic, within the clear acrylic table top. This is interesting and fun and therefore appeals to the students of Haydon School. It would attract them to the library.

I also designed a range of bookshelves that would compliment some of the table designs. This would allow me to visually see what styles were complimenting and therefore when it came to designing the layout of the Library, the overall style and design would be brought out. This would therefore meet the specification. All materials specified bellow are for the model.

1. This bookshelf isn’t out of the ordinary, but the placement and layout is effective even though simple. This compliments table design 5. The shelves are different heights to hold different sized books. This makes use of the function for the Library, meeting the specification. Within the model of the Library, this bookshelf would be produced from plywood because plywood has a high strength and stiffness. It is easy to work with. Plywood supports loads well, ideal for supporting the books its function is to hold. Plywood is stable and impact resistant and has a good quality finish, therefore being aesthetically pleasing.

2. This bookshelf is unique in the shape of its sides. The curved form appears simple and clean, however it is effective and modern. This bookshelf could compliment nearly all the tables due to its varied shape.Within the model of the Library the bookshelf would be produced From Balsa hardwood because it is tough and strong. Balsa is also lightweight.

3. The top of this bookshelf has the same design style as table design 3. This bookshelf isn’t as exciting and therefore wouldn’t appeal to the students. Due to its very simple and ordinary edges, it isn’t interesting to look at. This therefore doesn’t meet the specification in this sense.

4. The detailed structure of this bookshelf is interesting to look at due to the unique geometric shapes. Many of these would have to be used to hold all the Library books needed (specification.)Every part of this bookshelf, apart from the vertical corner structures would be produced from acrylic – either colours or clear. This would give a very modern and interesting look and it may give a futuristic feel. Acrylic requires no surface finish and is available in a range of exciting colours. The laser cutter would be used to produce these intricate shape quickly and accurately.The vertical corner structures would be produced from Pine because this is also relatively inexpensive and strong and the light colouring is modern.

5. This last bookshelf design would compliment any of the circular tables. It is an exciting design due to its uniqueness and differently sized shelves. This allows for a large range of book sizes to be stored on the bookshelf, meeting the specification. The books would need to be stacked against the dividers on each shelf to allow the books to stand upright. This bookshelf could therefore be quite difficult to use. A cylindrical style would probably be more suitable and practical. It would also be difficult to reach the top shelves due to its slanted sides.The shelves and dividers would be produced from clear Polypropylene as this is effective and futuristic, appealing to the modern students. PP is lightweight and rigid. The middle pole would be produced from a wooden dowel, because this is durable and available, therefore reduces manufacturing time.

Another feature that would add to the overall effect and design of the Library would be the designs and shapes of the beanbags, within the relaxing area. Therefore I designs a range of beanbag shapes and patterns that would appeal to the students of Haydon School. The designs shown bellow are unique and abstract due to the shapes. The swirled beanbag design was especially liked (by the target market) due to the interesting and different pattern the beanbag formed. They also liked the squared design with the smaller squares at the corners. This pattern was interesting and abstract and therefore they said it caught there eye.

In the model of the Library I would be manufacturing, the smaller scaled beanbag models would be produced from fabric sewed around and surrounding an inner material of either cotton wool or sand. This would create the 3-d texture and feel of the real sized beanbags. The thick fabric would be easily available and durable. It would also be available in colours and patterns, fully representing the real life beanbags. Fabric is aesthetically pleasing.

PLAN VIEWS

3

Table

Table

Table

BookshelvesBeanbags

Reading Area

Computers

Computer Room

Staff office

Teachers DeskEntrance

Exit

Bookshelf

Windows

1

Computer RoomTable

Bookshelf

Staff office

Bookshelf

Beanbags

BookshelfTable

Reading area

Windows

Teachers Desk

TableEntrance

Exit

Leaflet Holder

I then designed 3 plan views of possibilities for the Library. I used the designs I created earlier for the tables, bookshelves and beanbags to assist me in designing the different styles and features of the Library. This meant that the different components within the Library would compliment each other and therefore the Library layout as a whole would be aesthetically pleasing.

I used a scale of 1cm=1m. This meant each component and position was in proportion. It also meant that I could visualize where each component would go in relation to everything else.

I was realistic with the measurements and used the ergonomic data collected in Unit A to make the spaces between the tables and bookshelves wide enough for a person to walk between them and search for books etc. This means that the Library would function a lot better. The plans therefore meet my specification.I used shapes, styles and designs that would suit my target audience, and this would therefore attract them to use the Library – the design brief and aim.

My target market seemed to prefer plan design 1 the most due to its very unique and different shape and form. They thought that it was interesting and ‘cool’ and most of them said they would use the Library more often if it looked like design 1 due to it being attract. This therefore meets the specification according to the styles and designs.

The second design was next preferred because the tables were thought to be exciting. Someone thought it looked similar to a maze, and another person thought it looked like an old computer game. This therefore attracted them because students enjoy these things, especially boys.

Some students said that design 3 was too plain and simple due to the geometric shapes and because there was a lot of empty space. But they said that perhaps when the colours and patterns were added, it would look more attractive and appealing. Someone suggested rearranging the diagonal table (near the computers) straight to make this part of the Library more functional and practical.

In my opinion I feel that the second design is too busy due to the many straight lines creating the design layout. I therefore made designs one and three more spacious and this therefore wouldn’t be as confusing to the user. The spacious layout also allows more room to move.

Design 2 would probably be most functional due to the simple forms. Design one would probably be least functional due to the very unusual bookshelf designs, which many people probably wouldn’t be able to reach due to the angle of the sides (see bookshelf 5, 3 slides above.)

2

Computer Room

Staff office

Teachers DeskEntrance

Exit

Beanbags

Reading area

Computers

Tables

Tables

Table

Leaflet Holder

Bookshelves Bookshelves

Bookshelves

Bookshelf

Windows

1.1 - This first perspective drawing is of the top, left hand corner of the plan design (see above.) I used the colour scheme of blue and cream for this design because they give a relaxed feel together, due to the pale and subtle colours. This compliments the function of the Library. The circular and curved shapes/styles of the layout and components gives variety to the design and makes it more interesting. This design is quite abstract due to this and this therefore meets with the specification as this was what the students, when asked, preferred as a style. The blue and cream was also taken from the questionnaire (highly popular colour) and therefore also meets the specification. I have however, drawn this perspective drawing with the wrong perspective. The walls are too tall for the bookshelf and tables, and the top of the bookshelf is visible which shouldn’t be seen due to the perspective it needs to be at in relation to the viewer.

Within the model, the wooden floor of this design would be produced from Folding Boxboard, with the wooden texture printed on it. Folding Boxboard has an excellent printing surface, and the shiny texture of the surface would give the effect of the wooden floor (perhaps laminated on top in reality.) It is also inexpensive, keeping costs low, meeting the specification.

The walls of this design would be painted. The paint would give a creative and textured finish, making the design more interesting. A layer of varnish would be applied over the top of the paint to protect it and prevent the paint from chipping. The walls would therefore be quite durable, meeting the specification.

The windows of the design (shown on the right side of the perspective drawing,) would be produced from clear and transparent acrylic as this doesn’t need a surface finish and is very durable. Acrylic is also

1.1

Poster Ideas

From these plan views I developed the designs to give a 3-d perspective drawing of different corners of each plan view/design. I included different colours, styles and patterns for the different corners of one design, to show the different style possibilities of each plan design and to give the idea of what the Library would look like in reality. These patterns, colours and styles would also be realistically produced within the model of the Library I would be manufacturing.

aesthetically pleasing, adding to the quality of the design. Acrylic does, however, have a low scratch resistance and is also quite brittle. To prevent the acrylic from snapping so easily, strips of wooden MDF would be attached at intervals along the long window. This would add to the strength of the Acrylic (which would now be produced from shorter lengths) and it would represent windows in reality very well. Acrylic cement would be used to join the Acrylic pieces together because this is a permanent join and is strong.

The actual walls and structure of the design would be produced from MDF because this can be easily shaped, is inexpensive and has consistent strength, meaning the model would last for longer and would look aesthetically pleasing. The diamond type platform on the floor, and tables (with a dowel for the leg) would also be produced from MDF as the shape would be easily produced and ‘no grain’ would prevent it would splitting or warping (especially at a small size.)

The shelves of the circular bookshelf on this platform, would be produced from blue acrylic with the laser cutter, as the laser cutter would produce the small and intricate shapes easily and quickly. Thin plywood would be used to create the structure of the bookshelf because this would create the thin structures and sides well, and would be strong and durable to make the bookshelf last. A laser cutter would be used on the plywood too, for the same reasons.

1.2- This next design, is another perspective drawing for design 1. (see plan above). This is the top, middle of the design (next to the computer room on the right.)

I have again used the styles and colours of blue and cream as this gives a relaxed atmosphere, and the students preferred the colours blue. Blue suits both genders and therefore meets the specification. The layout of this section of the design is spacious, which not only allows movement, but also adds to the relaxed and calm atmosphere created. The full sized windows on the right would let in a lot of light, therefore making the space look bigger and more spacious. This all meets the specification. The wallpaper striped top is attractive and interesting due to the variety of colours and stripes used. This is an abstract and modern design which appeals to the students. The cream colour on the rest of the wall would appeal to the staff who would also be working within the Library. This design therefore meets the1.2

specification. However, the bookshelves would be too large and therefore heavy to transport within the library itself (real life sized), and this therefore doesn’t meet the specification. However, the bookshelves can be split into 3 with a middle section, which can be assembled once inside the Library. This makes it easier to transport.

Again, the perspective of this drawing is slightly wrong, due to the viewer being able to see the top of the bookshelves, therefore assuming that they are smaller in height to the person, which isn’t so.

In this design the patterns on the walls (and the wooden patterns of the floor) would beprinted onto Folding Boxboard, attached to the corriflute structure of the model. Folding boxboard has an excellent printing surface, giving a consistent and high quality finish for the walls. The patterns would be produced easier this way than with paint, for example.

The wooden parts of the bookshelves (shown below) would be produced from thin plywood because it is very strong due to the 90 degrees layout of ply.

This would make the bookshelf last longer. However, plywood isn’t very attractive, so a finish of paint or varnish would have to be applied. This would also protect the wood. The shelves would be produced from blue Polypropylene with the laser cutter, as the laser cutter would produce the small and intricate shelves easily and quickly. PP is lightweight but rigid and would be a good modelling material. The shelves would be attached to the Plywood edges with contact adhesive as this joins dissimilar materials and the bond forms very quickly so there is no need for clamping. However, this is relatively expensive and produces VOCs which isn’t good for the environment or health and therefore doesn’t meet the specification.

The tops of the tables shown would be produced from MDF as this can be easily shaped. It also has a shiny surface, producing the effect of a laminated surface on the table (representing reality). This makes it more realistic. The leg of the table would be very hard to produce, and therefore within the model only, it would be produced from a wooden dowel, attached/glued to the MDF base. These would both be painted metallic to create the ‘chrome plated’ effect of the realistic, life sized table.

The structure of the model would be produced from Corriflute because this is an excellent modelling material. It is also impact resistant, quite rigid and easy to join. The door to the computer room would be cut out (of the corriflute wall), and replaced within the hole. This would show the outline of the door easily, and give the general idea it is there within the structure. A Stanley knife and steel rule would be used to cut the Corriflute shape as this ideal, fairly quick and can be accurate if measured precisely.

1.3 - On each of my designs, there are ‘magnified’ sections of, for example the walls, which show the different possibilities of styles, colours and patterns that could be used. Here I have included different patterns and colours for the walls and bean bags. This allows the target market to view the possibilities available.

When asked for feedback for this design, it was found that the colour wasn’t attractive. It was too boring and plain and there was too much green for the eyes to take in. Therefore, because this doesn’t appeal to my target market, I wouldn’t be using the colours that are shown here. This design doesn’t meet the specification in this way. I would use a colour scheme from another design.

This perspective drawing shows the top, right hand corner of the Library, just below the computer room, of design 1. The beanbags would be produced from the materials listed 3 slides above. Or they would be bought from a dollhouse company as this would save time and they would be aesthetically pleasing and would represent the real life Library. The carpet would also be bought from a dollhouse company, to create the realistic texture of carpet, and therefore the model of the Library would be far easier to produce. An alternative could be that the carpet texture was printed onto Solid white board as this is strong and durable and has an excellent printing surface, allowing the printed design to be more realistic. This meets the specification.

The structure of the model would be made from Green Acrylic (or the colour that the walls would be), with the windows as hollow gaps to give the idea that they are there. Finger joints could be used on the Acrylic to join the different walls together as this would be effective, aesthetically pleasing and very strong. Acrylic cement would be used to join the Acrylic walls together because it bonds very fast and is strong. Or clear and transparent Acrylic could be used for the structure because this would mean that the inside of the model would be clearly visible from all sides, which meets the specification. The Acrylic would also bring a lot of light into the model, making it appear spacious.

The designs of the posters/boards on the walls would be printed onto Solid White Board as this is very strong and durable and has an excellent printing surface, adding to the quality of the model and making it aesthetically pleasing. This would also best represent the real life Library posters. The solid white board would be mounted onto acrylic, making it more aesthetically pleasing and durable.

The shelves on the wall of this design would be produced from Balsa modelling hardwood because it is lightweight, soft, and very strong. The shelves would be attached to walls using Contact Adhesive to join dissimilar materials because the bond forms quickly, however it is relatively expensive.

1.3

1.4 - The perspective drawing shown below, shows the design of the bottom, middle of plan design 1, just above the teachers’ office. The yellow and orange colour scheme was chosen due to the results of the questionnaire, which represent the students opinions and preferences. The colour scheme is complimentary and it suits the square design of the table. The yellow and orange shades also compliment the wooden and pale carpet flooring. A variety of different possibilities of the wall patterns are shown. The design is spacious and allows for movement. The space with the deep, alive yellows and oranges create a warm and cosy atmosphere which creates a space that students would want to be in. Their moods and feelings would therefore change to suit these colours and patterns, creating a comfortable and alive atmosphere within the Library, one that students would want to spend time in – objective.

The square table would be produced from Jelutong Hardwood with yellow Acrylic legs, because Jelutong is an excellent modelling material, is tough and strong and has a fine texture, therefore being aesthetically pleasing. The shape would be produced with the lasercutter, creating the intricate and fragile pieces easily and quickly. However, these Acrylic legs would be brittle due to the thin shape of them and therefore might need to be produced from Jelutong also. These materials would meet the specification. Again, contact adhesive would be used to join the Jelutong to the Acrylic as this joins dissimilar materials.

The room viewed in the distance is on a platform. Within the model, this platform and its steps would be produced from Polypropylene through the process of vacuum forming. PP is lightweight and rigid, supporting the tables and bookshelves on top. Vacuum forming is ideal as it can produce the different levels of the floor well. Vacuum forming is inexpensive and the MDF mould would be produced easily. However, the mould would need to be accurate (with slanted sides and rounded corners) which could be difficult due to the small size of the model. But, MDF can be shaped easily due to it having no grain.

The Leaflet holder in the back corner could be produced from a plain, flat sheet of Orange Acrylic, made into the curved form/shape through the process of Line Bending. (This would give the general idea of the leaflet holder.) Line bending is quick and can easily be done within a school workshop. However, a mould would need to be produced to shape the acrylic to the correct and accurate shape. The mould would be produced from MDF as this is easily shaped and sanded because it has no grain.

The structure of the model would be produced from Recycled card (for both the walls and floors.) Recycled card can be coloured orange for the walls, and the wooden effect of the floor could be painted straight onto the Recycled card to protect the material and to give a realistic effect. Recycled card is inexpensive but has a lower quality than virgin pulp cards, but it will be suitable for the model. The general idea of the windows would be shown by also painting it on the recycled card. The effect would be different and unique.

1.4

2.1 - The perspective drawing shown above, is a design for the top, left hand corner of plan design 2 (see above). The layout of this design is complimenting because the square shapes follow through and curve around each other. The table, shown above, follows the square layout of the bookshelves for example. This creates a secure and comfortable atmosphere. It also creates a working atmosphere as the books are surrounding the table. However, the closed space may cause a problem for people who are claustrophobic. This design is very appealing due to the bright and strong turquoise colours. These were chosen due to the results of the questionnaire. The majority of students chose turquoise as their preferred colour scheme. This design would therefore appeal to the target market and meets the specification. The different shades of the blue/turquoise give variety to the design. A variety of wall designs are shown on the wall itself, as this is another way of presenting my ideas.

The wall/floor structure of the Library would be produced from Scots Pine wood because this is aesthetically pleasing and relatively inexpensive. It is also fairly, strong, durable and easy to work with. A variety of joints could be used to join the wall structure together. Finger joints would be aesthetically pleasing due to the pattern the pine grain would make. They are also very strong because a lot of surface area is available for gluing. However, Finger joints take time to complete due to the accuracy and precision needed. Miter joints could be used as these are most aesthetically pleasing due to no end grain being visible, however much accuracy is needed to create 45 degrees angle and would therefore be the most difficult to produce.

The walls and wooden floor would be printed onto Cartridge paper, which would in turn would be joined to the Pine wood structure. Cartridge paper is completely opaque, showing the printed patterns clearly and the texture gives variety and represents reality. It can be trimmed easily to fit the dimensions of the structure also, saving time.

The table would have a blue Acrylic top, with grey Acrylic legs to create a ‘Chrome plated’ effect. The table might also need extra legs to prevent it from snapping in the middle due to brittleness of Acrylic – (This wouldn’t produce a model of high quality.)

The bookshelf sides would be produced from Aluminium Metal because it produces a light shiny texture, creating a futuristic and therefore appealing and modern design. The pale metallic colour compliments the pale floor and bright blue colours. Aluminium is lightweight (easier transportation – meets specification) but has excellent strength. The Aluminium would be cut and shaped using a circular saw (with aluminium blade). This saw and the material of aluminium itself wouldn’t be very available at school, therefore the whole bookshelf might need to be produced from Polypropylene instead (which the shelves would be made out of anyway.)

2.2 - This perspective drawing is the design for the top, middle of plan design 2, just below the computer room, to the right of the dividing wall. The colours and patterns of this design are attractive to the teenaged/student audience due to the bright and almost clashing colours. From the questionnaire, it was shown that the preferred colours were turquoise and orange, but I adapted this and took red instead as it matched better with the blue and pale yellows. This is quite a lively and bold colour scheme, however the curved lines/patterns within the walls calm this boldness down. The colour scheme meets the specification as it appeals to the target market. This area is a particular reading area and the style creates a fun atmosphere that would make reading more enjoyable. Again, the space is spacious and therefore allows for movement , which meets the specification. It also creates a calm feeling as the space isn’t too busy. This allows students to walk through without feeling pressurized.

Within the Model, the bookshelves within this design would be produced from Varnished (shelves – painted red) Jelutong Hardwood because this is an excellent modelling material. It has straight grain and a fine texture, making it aesthetically pleasing. It also has a low density, making it more lightweight, and therefore easier to transport. However, this wood isn’t readily available at school (not meeting the specification) and therefore Scots or Parana Pine would be more suitable.

The sliding door that sections off this reading and top area of the Library, would be produced from Rigid Polystyrene because this is rigid and lightweight, and quite durable. The door would slide back within the wall structure, through a gap in the Foam Board. The PS sliding door would be produced through injection moulding because it would produce the thin, intricate shape easily and accurately. However, this is very expensive for a one-off production and therefore the sliding door shape would probably just be cut out of sheet PS plastic to give the general idea.

Foam Board would therefore be used for the structure of the Library walls because it is an excellent modelling material and is lightweight and rigid. Its also very easy to cut and shape, therefore being easier to produce the model. However, foam boards can be easily pierced. A Stanley knife can be used to cut the foam board which is accurate, simple and quick. This is readily available at school also. The wall and floor patterns and colours would be printed onto Foil-lined board (which is then stuck to the foam board using contact adhesive,) because foil-lined board has a very high visual impact.

The square table on the left would be produced from Varnish Pine to compliment the Jelutong wood, and the paler colours also. The red and blue squares on this table would be painted on, representing the acrylic in reality.

The sofa’s/seats would either be bought from a dollhouse company, as they would be difficult to produce for a model due to the materials and curved edges. Or They could be produced using the ........? CAM machine which creates wooden 3-D objects from a design on the computer. This would be more accurate, quicker and a lot easier. The wood would then be painted in the correct colours. The cushions would be produced from cotton/fabric stuffed with cotton wool.

2.1

2.2

2.3 - This perspective drawing is specific to plan design 2, however it also shows what each design would look like at the doors of the Library (interior.) The shading is just to show the general shapes and forms of the objects there. In front of the doors are security beepers to prevent students from stealing the books within the Library. These would be produced from clear, transparent Acrylic as this gives a security effect, Acrylic needs no surface finish and is aesthetically pleasing.

The teachers desk is to the left, which would be created from PVC plastic, because it is strong and rigid. Vacuum forming would be used to produce the shape of the desk as this is ideal for shaping the PVC and it is inexpensive and relatively easy to produce the moulds.

The rim of the doors would be produced from Corrugated board, and clear, transparent Acrylic used for the windows within the doors. They would be on hinges or would be permanently attached to give the idea of movement.

The structure of the model would be produced from Corrugate board as well because it has excellent impact resistance, and excellent strength for its weight. It is recyclable and relatively inexpensive. However, corrugated board isn’t very aesthetically pleasing and can be difficult to cut to the correct size due to the ridges of the board. Therefore, Balsa wood could be used instead as this is more aesthetically pleasing, is an excellent modelling material, tough and strong, even though it is expensive.

The patterned carpet is unique and interesting, and creates a fun and exciting corner to relax in. The beanbags also complete this function. The design does however seem quite busy due to the many lines shown, including the bookshelf structures and the patterns on the floor. The bookshelves would therefore have to be spaced away from the bean bags more to provide more space. This would then meet the specification.

The bean bags would be produced from the materials described 5 slides above. Or they would be bought from a dollhouse company as this would save time and they would be aesthetically pleasing and would represent the real life Library. They would be bought in plain orange and red colours as these patterned bean bags are my own design.

The carpet design and texture would be achieved by printing the design onto Folding Boxboard which has an excellent printing surface, so the bold colours and patterns can be shown.

The structure of the model would be produced from GRP (glass reinforced plastic), because this would be a great modelling material due to its compressive and tensile strength. GRP is also lightweight (making the model easier to carry) and rigid, therefore lasting longer and not breaking easily. GRP plastic has a very smooth finish one side which would make the model very aesthetically pleasing. The rough side would be on the inside of the model, as this would be covered up by Foil-lined board because it is very aesthetically pleasing (however expensive.) The wall patterns/designs would be printed onto the foil-lined board. The windows would also be produced from GRP, however either a different colour to the other walls or if possible, a clear and transparent GRP to represent the windows better.

The bookshelf materials are described 5 slides above – Acrylic and Pine/Dowels.

3.1 - This perspective drawing is of the top, left hand corner of plan design 3, shown below. I chose to use the colour scheme of red, orange and yellow as these were the preferred colours from the questionnaire. The colours are bright and bold, making the Library alive and exciting. This would appeal to the students, meeting the specification. However, I don’t think the colours are complimenting, especially the brown and cream wall. This therefore doesn’t meet the specification.

2.3

3.1

9

3.2 - This next perspective drawing is the middle, top of plan design 3, to the left of the computer room. The colour scheme of this design is dramatic due to the contrasting shades and colours. The colour scheme is bold and bright and would therefore appeal to students. It is also a modern design. The square design running throughout this design makes everything compliment everything else and is therefore attractive and aesthetically pleasing. This design meets the specification with its designs and styles. Again, the wall of this design has different possibilities – shown.

The table would be produced from the softwood pine with an Acrylic covering top (See 6 slides above.) The laser cutter would be used to produce the shapes as they would be produced accurately and precisely, so the green squares would fit inside the clear Acrylic top. This leaves a smooth surface finish.

The bookshelf would again be produced as described 6 slides above. Acrylic shelves with either dowel wood or MDF wood structures.

The wall would be painted to give an interesting texture and colour. A coat of varnish would be used to protect the paint. The patterned floor would also be painted straight onto the Mounting board floor to give variety and texture.

The structure of the walls would be produced from Mounting Board because this has a very high quality and is both strong and rigid, making it durable and therefore it would last longer. Mounting board is available in a large range of colours, and therefore the wall patterns might not even need to be painted – perhaps only the border. This saves time and the colour would be more consistent. The Mounting board can either be cut with the laser cutter (which is available in school) because this is quick, accurate and leaves a smooth edge. Or, Die Cutting could be used because this is a fast process and very accurate. However, Die Cutting is very expensive for a one-off production of a model, and therefore the laser cutter would be more suitable. This would then meet the specification. The Mounting board structures would be joined together using PVA because it gives a strong joint and is relatively inexpensive. This meets the specification. However, PVA takes at least 24 hrs to dry completely which takes up time.

The door (to the computer room) shown, would be produced from Mounting Board also. It would have hinges to represent how the door would open and close in reality, and to show the space that would be used up/needed to open the door completely. This door opens inwards, and therefore doesn’t affect the space that I'm designing.

The windows would be produced from HDPE – clear and transparent – because HDPE is tough and hard wearing (lasting long and durable). It is very rigid and also lightweight so the model is easier to carry. The laser cutter could be used to cut the desired shape and size, because it is accurate and quick. Alternatively, the HDPE could be cut using a scroll saw which is available at school (meets specification) and is still a quick process.

3.2

3.3

3.3 - The last perspective drawing uses the colour scheme of purple. This isn’t what the students preferred, from the questionnaire, however it is unique to the other colour schemes I have designed. The striped design on the walls and floors is random and is therefore more abstract, appealing to the students. The floor and walls compliment each other and match due to the same patterns (however the wall is a lighter shade.) This makes this area feel together and the students would feel comfortable and relaxed, meeting the specification. I came up with this pattern from the image shown at the bottom of this page.

The table on the purple platform would have 6 computers which any student could useat any time. This is what the students said they would like within the Library area (according to the questionnaire. This also applies to the beanbags and reading areas.)

The purple platform would be produced from PVC because this material is strong and tough and therefore durable. It would support the tables and bookshelves. This platform would be produced through Blow Moulding because it would produce the small shape quickly and easily (saving time). Blow moulding would produce the platform hollow, which reduces weight and material costs and waste (meets the specification). However, blow moulding is very expensive for one-off production within a model, due to the high costs of the mould and process, therefore alternatively vacuum forming could be used. Vacuum forming is ideal as it can produce the different levels of the floor well. Vacuum forming is inexpensive and the MDF mould would be produced easily. However, the mould would need to be accurate which could be difficult due to the small size of the model. But, MDF can be shaped easily due to it having no grain.

The stripes (pattern) on the platform would be achieved by using coloured, Adhesive Backed Vinyl strips because this is attractive, bright coloured and the Vinyl is easily cut into the desired shapes.

The posters on the walls would be produced from MDF, with the photographs printed onto normal printing paper (copier paper), glued onto the MDF. The MDF gives the copier paper more strength and allows the poster to be aesthetically pleasing and of a high quality. Copier paper is inexpensive when purchased in bulk.

The tables and bookshelves would be produced from Balsa Wood again because it is tough and strong, therefore being durable. Balsa can be easily shaped, producing the table and bookshelf shapes easily. Balsa is a good modelling material for small shapes also. The purple, left table would be painted and finished with varnish to protect the purple paint underneath. The varnish would also protect the wood. The table would therefore last longer.

The structure of the model (walls and floors) would be produced from Expanded Polystyrene because this is an interesting alternative (making the model interesting and unique also.) Expanded polystyrene is easily shaped, lightweight, durable and impact resistant therefore being of a high quality and making the model easy to transport and last longer. Epoxy resin would be used to join the PS structure walls together because it harden immediately and gives a permanent join. The PS sheet could be cut to size using a Stanley knife as this is available in school and isn’t an expensive process. Using a Stanley knife is also quick. This all meets the specification. The wall pattern would either be painted onto the PS, however the porous texture would still be visible – less aesthetically pleasing. Therefore both the floor and wall patterns can be printed onto Solid White Board and attached to the PS using Contact Adhesive because this joins dissimilar materials and the bond sets quickly.

Feedback• I received feedback from a number of different students from Haydon School. One student really liked the orange/yellow colour schemes because they were bright and the colours were warm. She said that this would make her feel comfortable and cosy within the Library. This student also liked the layout of design 8 because the linear forms and bookshelves were interesting. • Design 2 was also liked due to the shape of the bookshelves. They were said to be unique and interesting and made the Library look fun. It appealed to them. The striped blue border of this design 2 was said to be modern and interesting. They said it would make them use the Library more often as it was more friendly to students.• Another student really liked design 4 due to the futuristic appearance and feel. He said the curved leaflet holder was fun and the colours appealed to him because they were bright and young.• However, I did receive feedback that the cream carpet/mat would get very muddy and was therefore either a good idea to have the carpets as deeper colours, or to change the carpet materials to wood. This would therefore be easier to clean and would be more aesthetically pleasing and modern.• Design 9 was said to be very exciting and modern. The student said it was a fun design and was attractive due to the bright and contrasting colours. These colours were liked by quite a few students.• Three students really liked design 6 because the striped wallpaper was interesting and the clashing colours were modern and attractive. They also liked the idea of the sectioned reading area as this was needed and it would make the Library relaxing. They also liked the cushions!• Design 5 has 3 different possible wallpaper designs. The bottom left design (the futuristic lightning bolts) were preferred because the colours were attractive and bright and the design was futuristic and therefore modern. The colours of this design appealed to the students, therefore meeting the specification. • However, the green colours of Design 3 were said to be too dark and deep. The green colour was too distractive and wasn’t a nice shade of green. It was suggested that more colours were added to this design to make it more attractive, or the colour scheme should be changed overall.

From this feedback I have decided that Plan Design 1 is the preferred design due to its interesting forms and shapes. The design was said to be unique, futuristic and therefore interesting and modern. This would attract students to the Library more often which is the objective. However, I feel that there needs to be more work space for lessons which is a need included within the specification.

From the feedback, the preferred colour schemes were the turquoise, bright contrasting greens and the oranges. These colours are all bright and attractive and they catch your eye, therefore attracting students to them and therefore inside the Library. These colour schemes will be considered for the final style of the Library design.

The preferred shapes and patterns were the abstract patterns, which was the outcome within the questionnaire. The contrasting patterns were also preferred. I will therefore use the abstract patterns and designs for my final Library design. This will therefore meet the specification and user needs and wants.

FEEDBACK

I then developed my 2-D element – the sign outside the Library. I designed 2 different signs for each plan design. I used the same or very similar styles, colours and patterns for the sign, as I have used within the perspective drawings of the interior of the Library, so that they compliment each other and link up. I have included information on the materials and processes that I would use within the architectural model to produce each sign.

Sign above - To meet the Specification I included the colours and styles of design 3.2. The contrasting colours are attractive and modern. Because design 3 is very geometric, I chose to produce the sign in squares, which also compliments the tables and bookshelves. The 3 separate squares could either be positioned with a gap in-between them or together. This is unique and interesting and therefore appeals to students. However, the font isn’t very attractive and is difficult to read, therefore the background colour of each letter would need to be changed or the letter colour itself (maybe to white.)

The material GRP (glass reinforced plastic) would be used to produce this sign because it comes in many colours – light and dark green would be needed. GRP is also a great modelling material. It is lightweight, so won't break the side of the model structure when attached to it. GRP is also rigid, therefore lasting longer and not breaking easily. GRP plastic has a very smooth finish one side which would make the model very aesthetically pleasing. The rough side would be attached to the model structure walls.

The laser cutter would be used to cut the desire shape and perhaps engrave the letters within. However, this wouldn’t produce colour on the sign, and therefore adhesive backed Vinyl would be used, cut using the vinyl cutter because this is quick and very accurate and also consistent, therefore adding quality.

2-D Library signs for Library design 3.The materials that would be used to

produce this sign (left) would be purple sheet PP, cut to size using a Stanley knife, because PP is lightweight but also rigid, therefore not breaking easily and not weighing the model structure down as much. Vinyl would be used for the thin lettering and the different coloured stripes and squares because this is soft and flexible, therefore easily cut using the vinyl cutter (accurately). It is very hard to snap or split, due to its flexible property, therefore very suitable to produce the thin lettering on the model. These materials also represent reality very well – meets the specification.

This sign above compliments the colours and patterns of design 3.3. The design is quite busy due to the many lines and colours, and the colours also appeal mostly to females which doesn’t meet the specification. The lettering is quite bold against the background, however, therefore being easily read from a distance. I have included an image of the inside of the Library to allow students to see what it looks like inside, therefore enticing them in. This meets the specification.

This sign above links and compliments the designs, colours and patterns of design 2.2, therefore being a sign for Library design 2. The nearly clashing colours are attractive, however the colours would attract the younger age range of 11-14 more due to the primary colours. I have added tone to these colours to make them more interesting. The white border is in the shape of the top of the tables of design 2. This links to the shapes of the interior of the Library too, therefore meeting the specification. I have added the text ‘Have fun and relax while you study’ to let the students know what the function of the new Library is, however this phrase does sound quite ‘cheesy’.

To produce this sign within the model, red Foam Board would be used as the base of the sign to match the structure walls of the model. Foam board is aesthetically pleasing and an excellent modelling material. Foam board is very lightweight and rigid. A Stanley knife can be used to cut the foam board which is accurate, simple and quick. The coloured design would be printed onto Foil Lined board (then attached to the foam board using contact adhesive or u-hu glue which is available at school.) Foil-lined board has an excellent printing surface, and is therefore high quality. It would attract people to the model and Library well.

2-D Library sign for Library

design 2.

2-D Library sign for Library design 2.

This sign to the right was designed for Library design 2.1. Because the ‘lightning bolt’ wallpaper design was preferred for this interior design, I used the ‘lightning bolt’ shape for the sign. This is futuristic (as one student said) and was very attractive due to the bright colours. The futuristic style also links to the idea that the Library is New and modern. The font/lettering could either be a bold, dark blue as shown, on the lighter background, or the lettering could be surrounded by a glow to emphasize the futuristic and modern design. The reflection of the letters is unique and interesting and adds variety.

This sign would be produced from Corriflute because it is lightweight and therefore won’t fall off the model structure walls easily. Corriflute is also impact resistant, quite rigid and would be joined to the Scots Pine model structure using u-hu. The tonal colours, fonts and images design would be printed onto either Solid white board, because this has an excellent printing surface (high quality and attractive) and is very strong and rigid, however it is expensive. Therefore, Cartridge paper would be more suitable because this is relatively inexpensive and is available at school, meeting the specification. This would be cut to the desired shape and attached to the corriflute using double sided sticky tape because this is permanent, strong and quick. Or

The sign bellow compliments Library design 1.2. It includes the shape of a birds eye view of the bookshelf within Library design 1. This design isn’t as attractive and therefore won’t appeal to students 11-18. Doesn’t meet the specification. However, this design does appeal to both genders due to the neutral background and blues and purples used. The striped design compliments the border of design 1.2, therefore meeting the specification. The bright colours are attractive and fun. The randomArrangement of the stripes appeals to students.

This sign would be produced from MDF because it is fairly easy and quick to shape (especially into the circle design) due to there being no grain. MDF is quite heavy, however, and wouldn’t look aesthetically pleasing with the Corriflute Structure of the model, not meeting the specification. The patterned design would either be painted onto the shiny, smooth side of the MDF as this is effective and attractive and aesthetically pleasing. However, paint wouldn't be consistent or of a high quality, so again vinyl could be used instead, the small striped and lettering produced on the vinyl cutter as this is accurate.2-D Library sign for Library design 1.

For each of the sign designs, I have used lettering and font that suits the shapes and patterns of the sign and Library shapes. This makes the signs aesthetically pleasing and attractive, also readable. Above, are a few different font and lettering styles that I could use for the different signs to make them attractive. They would be produced in colour on the signs themselves.

Or 2-D Library sign for Library design

1.This lettering above is more attractive to students (than the lettering used on the sign), and

suits the sign shape better.

Yellow colour

scheme would be

used instead.

The sign to the left, compliments Library design 1. It uses the shape of the platform in design 1, and the colour scheme of design 1.4. This meets the specification. The abstract shape appeals to th students because it is interesting, fun and modern. Abstract shapes were preferred by the students within the questionnaire. The colour scheme is bight and warm, and would therefore entice the students to use the Library. The phrase ‘experience a new way to study’ is catchy, but again quite ‘cheesy’ and therefore may put students from entering the Library, which then wouldn’t meet the specification.

The materials that would be used to produce this sign within the model, would be an Acrylic or Balsa wood base because both are aesthetically pleasing, rigid and fairly light. The laser cutter would be used to cut the desired shape of the sign because this is a fast and yet accurate process. Alternately, the scroll saw could be used, which is equally quick, and can be equally accurate. Either, the laser cutter could be used, on the Acrylic, to engrave the letters and text on, however this wouldn’t be as bold and only the base colour would be seen which isn’t attractive. But, the images could be quite effective as outlines, however the reality wouldn’t be seen. Alternatively, folding boxboard could be used to print the design on, then attach it to the Acrylic base because this has an excellent printing surface and is excellent to cut without splitting.

From received feedback from the target market and client group, signs 3, 4 and 6 were preferred. Sign 3 was particularly liked because of the abstract colours and the white border that represented the table design. It was attractive they said and would entice them into the Library. Someone said that perhaps the text to the right needed to be bolder and clearer however. A few students said they did like design 1, however the word ‘Library’ wasn’t very clear. Sign design 4 was said to be attractive with the bright colours and variety of blue tones. The single words to the right were easy to read and were catchy.

I’ve produced 3 designs for the structure of the architectural model. These are exploded, perspective drawings to show how the model structure would be assembled. Some of the joins are permanent, shown by arrows with glue droplets. Some joins (for example the Lid) are removable, shown by double way arrows.

The walls and base of this first structural design (left) would either be produced from MDF because this comes in large sizes, so a large model of 1000mm x 800mm would be produced easily. Or, balsa wood would be used because this is an excellent modelling material and is very soft and light, making the model easy to transport. Balsa has very high strength and is very tough, therefore making the model last longer and makes it more durable. However, balsa wood isn’t easily available at school and is expensive (not meeting the specification) and therefore either MDF or Mounting board would be preferred.

The Lid and right wall would be produced from clear and transparent Acrylic, so the inside layout of the model can be easily viewed by the user. The lid would be removable to allow easy access to the interior. Acrylic is aesthetically pleasing and durable also.

Finger joints would be used to join the right Acrylic wall to the left MDF or Mounting board wall because this is a permanent and very strong bond due to the large gluing area available. It is also aesthetically pleasing and would add quality to the model. U-hu or Contact adhesive would be used to join the dissimilar materials together because they are both strong permanent glues and the u-hu is available in school.

The laser cutter would be used to produce the different components of the structure because it is accurate and a fast process, that involves little human error. The different sections would slot together very well – quality.

The walls and first base of this structural design (right) would be produced from either Foam Board or Corriflute. Foam Board is an excellent modelling material and is lightweight and rigid. Its also very easy to cut and shape, therefore being easier to produce the model. However, foam boards can be easily pierced. A Stanley knife can be used to cut the foam board which is accurate, simple and quick. This is readily available at school also. Corriflute is also an excellent modelling material. It is also impact resistant, quite rigid and easy to join, therefore making the model durable. Foam board is more aesthetically pleasing however. The windows to the right of the design would just be gaps to give the idea that there is a window. This doesn’t suggest quality however, so clear Acrylic would be suitable. U-hu glue or PVA would be used as a permanent join for the sides and base of the material. The Foam board base would in turn be attached to an MDF base to strengthen the model and support the whole structure. There wouldn’t be a lid so the interior of the Library can be visible with ease. The sliding door that sections off this reading and top area of the Library, would be produced from Rigid Polystyrene because this is rigid and lightweight, therefore being quite durable. The door would slide back within the wall structure, through a gap in the Foam Board. The PS sliding door would be produced through injection moulding because it would produce the thin, intricate shape easily and accurately. However, this is very expensive for a one-off production and therefore the sliding door shape would probably just be cut out of sheet PS plastic to give the general idea.

The wall and floor patterns and colours would be printed onto Foil-lined board (which is then stuck to the foam board (using contact adhesive,) because foil-lined board has a very high visual impact. However, it is expensive so folding boxboard could be an alternative.

Paint finish MDF window structures for

strength

Base would be made up of planks of MDF or mounting board to represent a wooden floor

Dado Joint

The materials that would be used for the walls of the structural design to the left, would be GRP (glass reinforced plastic,) – clear and transparent for the windows (left) and coloured for the rest. GRP is excellent because this would be a great modelling material due to its compressive and tensile strength. GRP is also lightweight (making the model easier to carry) and rigid, therefore lasting longer and not breaking easily. GRP plastic has a very smooth finish one side which would make the model very aesthetically pleasing. The rough side would be on the inside of the model, as this would be covered up by Folding boxboard or cartridge paper. Folding boxboard is very aesthetically pleasing however more expensive than cartridge paper, and less available at school. The wall patterns/designs would be printed onto the folding boxboard. The lid and base of the model would be produced from clear Acrylic. This is durable and aesthetically pleasing due to its smooth surface finish. However, it does have a low scratch resistance. The base would be attached to Scots Pine (produced by long planks attached together for the required size. Biscuit joints would be used to attach these planks together for a permanent and strong joint.) The Scots pine would be visible through the clear Acrylic, making it unique and interesting and representing the wooden floor of the design well.

The GRP walls would be joined with a 45 degrees Mitre joint for a safer finish to the structure and so the join is strong and aesthetically pleasing. The GRP would be attached together and to the Acrylic using Acrylic cement or contact adhesive for the dissimilar GRP and Acrylic.

Die cutting would be used to cut the Folding Boxboard for the walls because this is fast and accurate, however expensive for one-off production and not available at school. The laser cutter would be more appropriate. The laser cutter could also be used for the different components of the structure for accuracy and quickness and ease.

The door to the right of the design, would be cut out (of the GRP) and either rejoined to the GRP wall permanently to give the idea of there being a door. Alternatively, a hinge could be used to join the door to the GRP wall so that the door can open and close. This represents the reality design very well and shows the user how the door would open in reality.

Dado Joint for strength and support.

Hinge

UNIT C2Specification Points –

Interior Design Design 1.1 Design 1.2 Design 1.3 Design 1.4 Design 2.1 Design 2.2

Does the design perform its function

successfully?

Design 1 performs its function well. It contains an area for working staff as well as for students. However, there isn’t a specific area of tables to contain at least a class of 30 students. This would therefore need to be developed. The area does allow at least 50 students to study at the same time. The design however, needs to contain a few more bookshelves to store the correct amount of books and to section different book topics. The design does contain a relaxing area too.

Design 2 performs its function well. It contains both an area for working staff and students. There is also a specific space for a class of 30 students. This therefore meets the specification and need. The design may need to contain a few more bookshelves to meet the questionnaire results, however there is a suitable amount of space for books already. The whole design also contains a relaxing area and reading area – what the students wanted.

Do all the Aesthetics of the design

compliment each other and are they

aesthetically pleasing?Is the design suitable

and appealing to students aged 11-18,

of both genders?

The overall design is complimenting due to the pale, yet attractive, colours. The pale and simple patterns and designs compliment the curved and flowing design. This therefore meets the specification. The blue used suits both genders and the cream colour is neutral.

The straight stripes of the border of this design, doesn’t compliment the curved design of the bookshelves as well as it could. The plain blue or circular border suggested would suit the style better. However, the striped border is attractive due to the different tonal colours. The wood is effective.

The carpet compliments the soft green colours. The cream carpet stops the design from being too overwhelming. However, the green isn’t very attractive and therefore would not appeal to the target market. Perhaps different colours walls are needed.

The patterns of this design are attractive, pleasing and eye-catching. The different orange and brown tones compliment not only themselves but the square, and curved designs. The different wallpapers suggested would perhaps be too overwhelming, but could be used as the poster.

The colours/styles are complimenting due to the different tones of blue and neutral wooden floor and metal bookshelves. The wallpaper is eye-catching, fun and attractive and appeals to both genders of 11-18. The layout of the bookshelves surrounding the tables is comfortable and relaxing.

This design is quite abstract due to the almost clashing reds, blues and yellows, however it is also complimenting too. The curved shapes of the sofa’s match the curved wallpaper and carpet outline. However, the square table doesn’t compliment the abstract curved shapes and this may need to be changed. This style and colours suits female genders slightly more however.

Does the design suit all the ergonomics of the

students? (The average male is 1740mm tall,

450mm wide. The average female is

1650mm tall, 400mm wide.) Do the

components and layout of the Library have

dimensions that suit these human dimensions

to allow comfortable, easy use and movement?

The tables in this design are supposed to fit approx 10 people around them. I have drawn the table too high for this, as the current height would lead to uncomfortable use. Also the average female may not be able to reach the bookshelf height of 1700mm. It is a suitable currently, however it may need to be decreased in height.

The ergonomical and anthropometrical bookshelves and tables of this design are probably positioned 0.5m too close to the door of the Computer room. This can be changed easily due to the large amount of space between these bookshelves and the opposite tables. There needs to be an extra 800mm between the bookshelves and the tables to be anthropometrically suitable.

This design is spacious and therefore has a lot of room for movement. The beanbags are not attached to the floor, and can therefore be moved to suit the user. The beanbags are suitable height off the floor, compared to the low ceiling of approx 2m. This makes the beanbags comfortable and therefore function well. They suit the anthropometrics.

The leaflet holder is (approx 700mm) too high for the average student to reach the top shelf. However, the table has the correct anthropometric dimensions and therefore would be comfortable and easy to use as a table for study. The shape may provide difficult movement to get within the gap of the table however. The layout provides much space for easy movement.

The table needs to be 1000mm further to the left and 500mm further to the right to allow students to sit at the table and use the bookshelves at the same time. This would also make working at the table more comfortable and therefore more ergonomically suitable. The bookshelves and table are correct height for the average student, therefore providing easy use.

The ceiling in this part of the Library is low, therefore the bookshelves and sweats are the correct height, even though they don’t appear to be. I think perhaps the sofa seats need to be 150mm higher, proportionally overall, providing comfortable use. There is a large amount of space for movement between the seats and bookshelves which allows easy use.

Does the design contain these main features?:

Working Area for students and staff,

Bookshelves, Beanbag/Relaxing Area,

at least 2 Leaflet Holders?

This design as a whole contains a large working area for students and also the same size working area for staff (as the initial design.) The design does contain bookshelves, however more need to be included. Within Unit A, the questionnaire revealed that the majority of people wanted an increase of bookshelves. However, I have included the same amount, maybe smaller. The change could be to include more cylindrical bookshelves. The design does include 2 leaflet holders, that are larger than average size which is very functional. There are 2 main relaxing areas – beanbags and the sofa reading area in the opposite corner of the bookshelves. This design contains all the needed features. However, a few computers could also be added and tables arranged next to each other for class lessons.

This second design as a whole contains a large working space for the students, allowing 110 students to study at one time. A class of 30 students can also use this Library too. This therefore also meets the specification. The same amount of space has been kept for the staff which is suitable. As stated in the function, a few more bookshelves could be added for maximum use. This design only has 1 leaflet holder. Therefore I would need to include/add another to meet the specification.

Would the design be safe to use in reality? Is there enough room for safe movement?

The platform could be a tripping hazard and has sharp corners. However, it is very visible and is permanently attached to the floor – more safe and stable.

(As above,) the bookshelves are 0.5m too close to the door – isn't a safe exit. However, there is a large amount of space to move around the bookshelves – safe.

This is a very safe corner of the design due to the soft beanbags and large amounts of room for movement. The only hazard is the shelves, which have small risks, as they are permanently attached.

The table isn't as stable and not as safe, due to its large size. This could be overcome by making the table from 4 individual tables. The higher floor to the left is a tripping hazard and may not be seen. A sign could be used as a warning.

This design would be safe to use in reality due to the stable components. The table would be more transportable and safer if it made up of 4 separate tables joined together. In the model it would also be stable.

The sliding door in this design could be a hazard. It would need to be opened and closed with a key to avoid students breaking it etc. The other components are safe, however within the model, most of these components (sofa, tables) would need curved corners and edges.

Each design for both the 3-D interior design and 2-D sign element was reviewed and feedback was asked for and given. I have compared each design against the main points of the specification, to make sure that the designs meet the specification. I can then see what developments and improvements need to be made to make each design function and work suitably. From this review, I can then make a decision as to which design I will take forward to develop and improve, or whether I will take certain aspects from each design to create a better and more improved design that is attractive and functions very well.

Specification Points cont. From last page – same

designsDesign 1.1 Design 1.2 Design 1.3 Design 1.4 Design 2.1 Design 2.2

Would the materials, processes and design

used for the components be safe for the architectural model? Would the

structures be stable, reliable and durable?

MDF has a smooth surface finish, and is therefore unlikely to cause injury. The laser cutter (to cut the Acrylic shelves) must be used correctly for safe use. The bookshelf would be stable due to its consistent shape all the way. However, because the tables have very large surfaces compared to the base, they are less stable and more likely to fall over. But because the components are permanently attached to the base of the model, they will be stable.

Corriflute for the structure of the model is reliable and durable, however may not be very stable. It isn’t the strongest material and therefore it would bend fairly easily. But, the folding boxboard covering (for the walls and floors) would strengthen the model. Plywood is durable and strong for the bookshelves, therefore being reliable and lasting a long time.

Balsa Hardwood for the shelves on the wall of this design is strong and very tough, and therefore very durable and long lasting. Balsa wood is safe is smoothed down. Acrylic is very strong and durable also, however quite brittle. Therefore Balsa wood might be more suitable for the wall structures. Acrylic is safe to use if sanded smooth. The laser cutter is safe if used correctly. It is very accurate.

PP for the platform of this design, might be lightweight, but it is very rigid and strong, therefore supporting the components on top of it well. It is durable and has good impact resistance. The vacuum former, again, is safe if used correctly. The PP and vacuum forming machine must not be touched when hot t avoid injury. Recycled card for the model structure is stable and fairly strong, but not as reliable. Care must be taken when using a Stanley knife to cut the card, to avoid serious injury.

Aluminium is very strong and therefore reliable and supporting. The surface of aluminium is very smooth, however the edges can be very sharp if not smoothed down enough. Care must be taken when cutting aluminium as the scroll saw is hazardous if not used correctly. Scots pine is safe and strong, however it can warp over time and therefore isn’t reliable or stable in the long run.

Jelutong wood is very strong and tough, therefore being durable and reliable. It would last a long time. Foam board is stable and strong, and is an excellent modelling material. It is reliable and aesthetically pleasing. Care must be taken when using a Stanley knife to cut the Foam Board to the desired shape. Other than this, Foam board is safe.

Do the designs for the Library suggest

quality with precise and technical

drawings? Is the layout of the design

attractive, precise and in proportion?

The height of most objects in this perspective drawing are below eye level, which is incorrect. This makes them seems smaller. However, the layout is quite accurate and the patterns and styles are all complimenting suggesting quality.

Due to the complimenting colours and styles, this design is aesthetically pleasing and therefore has quality. The components and layout are drawn to proportion. The layout is attractive due to the flowing shapes. Again, the bookshelves aren’t drawn tall enough to appear taller than the human eye.

Apart from the green colour (which isn’t aesthetically pleasing – see above), the layout suggests quality due to the symmetrical layout and fanned/curved style. The carpet gives a relaxed look and therefore suits its function.

I feel that this corner of design 1 suggests the most quality due to the different tonal oranges and browns. The unique square table design, floor and platform contrasts to the curved design of the rest of the Library, but is effective and complimenting. This design appears more finished and realistic.

This design looks very professional due to the detailed wallpaper design and complimenting colours and styles. This therefore makes it very aesthetically pleasing and of a high quality. The perspective drawing is in proportion showing what the model would look like.

The perspective drawing is in proportion and represents what the design would look like in reality well. The abstract design is aesthetically pleasing and is of a high quality. However, this design/corner would be hard to replicate within the architectural model and therefore might not be accurate - the shapes need to be simpler for the seats.

Does the layout of the design allow easy

transportation of its components and is it

stably arranged?

The platform in this design would be permanently attached to the floor for safety, and therefore wouldn’t be transported out the Library easily. In reality, the tables would be difficult to transport due to their large size. If the bookshelves were to be disassembled, this would allow for easy transportation. Within the Architectural model, the Lid would be able to lift off the model, and therefore the different components of the model would be easily placed and arranged inside. The permanent attachment of each aspect of the design within the model would allow easy and comfortable transportation of the model. It would also be very stable. This is safe also. The maximum size of the model of 1000mm x 800mm would allow fairly easy and comfortable transport, however 2 people may have 2 carry it. This size could be too large, as this would be quite heavy too.

The sliding door within this design wouldn’t be very stable within the model because the material used would have to be thin. If all the components were permanently attached to the floor of the design, it would be stable and therefore easier to transport. The maximum size of the model of 1000mm x 800mm would be fairly easy and comfortable to carry, however it may need 2 people to carry it. The components would be easily arranged within the model, due to it being of a small scale.

Was feedback asked for and given?

Students said that the diamond platform was unique and interesting. They liked the cylindrical bookshelf as it was different. They thought however that the tables were too big – wouldn’t like to sit at a table with 10 other people. A few people said this would be fun however.

The layout and bookshelves of this design were said to be unique and interesting and fun. It was appealing and caught students eyes. A few people said that the striped border was modern, friendly and interesting because of the different tonal variety. Less people preferred the alternative circles border because the blue was too deep.

Students said that the green was unattractive because it was too deep and dark. The green was said to be distractive. I received feedback that perhaps more complimenting colours were added or the colour scheme changed completely. They did however like the beanbag space as the layout was fun and it looked comfortable.

A student said that this design looked warm and cosy due to the bright shades. Another student said they thought this design and layout looked futuristic because of the curved leaflet holder compared to the unique geometric table. This corner was said to be fun. Bright and young.

Someone commented that they thought the bookshelves looked unstable due to the thin metal material and the thin width. I could make this bookshelf therefore out of a different material or make it wider. The lightning bolt wallpaper was preferred because it looked futuristic and therefore modern. It was appealing to them and was bright.

The clashing colours were said to be modern and attractive and appealed to the teenaged audience. The staff also liked the wallpaper as it was different, however they said it could distract from learning. Students liked the idea of the sliding door and sectioned reading area because it looked relaxing, peaceful and quiet and would encourage them to use the Library more often.

Specification Points – interior designs Design 2.3 Design 3.1 Design 3.2 Design 3.3

Does the design perform its function

successfully?---------- (See slide …)

Because this design is abstract, unique and eye-catching, it encourages fun learning. The design is spacious therefore encouraging relaxed learning. There is a large area for study, and allows 90 pupils to study at a time which meets the specification. There is a large area for relaxation which encourages students to read and learn within the quite spaces. However, the tables need to the far right need to be positioned straight due to the space being needed for lessons.

Do all the Aesthetics of the design compliment each other and are they aesthetically pleasing?Is the design suitable

and appealing to students aged 11-18, of

both genders?

The design shown here represent the entrance of all the other designs too. Therefore the colours and styles would compliment the specific design. The layout however is aesthetically pleasing due to the large amount of space and therefore light. It makes the entrance light and relaxing, supporting the function of the Library.

The colours, styles and patterns of this design don’t compliment as much as they could. The bright oranges and reds don’t match the beige and cream walls, and the abstract lightning carpet design, is very different to the geometric walls and bookshelves. Therefore the colours and patterns would need to be changed to match. However, the individual colours and patterns do appeal to both genders of age 11-18, perhaps more aimed at the middle ages.

The colour scheme and patterns of this design are really attractive and would appeal to both genders of 11-18 years. It is a unique and eye-catching design due to the bright colours. The whole design is geometric and therefore is complimenting. The large window space brings a lot of light to the space, making it more spacious. It is aesthetically pleasing.

This design is more suited to the female audience due to the pinks, blues and purple patterns of the walls and platform floor. The colours are deep, however soft, and this would therefore create a busy atmosphere to the space. This doesn’t encourage relaxed and fun learning. However the design is complimenting and fun. The colours of this design could be changed to make it appealing to the whole target market.

Specification Points - cont. From last page – same designs Design 2.3 Design 3.1 Design 3.2 Design 3.3

Does the design suit all the ergonomics of the students?

(The average male is 1740mm tall, 450mm wide. The average female is 1650mm tall, 400mm wide.) Do the components and

layout of the Library have dimensions that suit these human dimensions to allow comfortable, easy use and

movement?

The door for the entrance of this design (applies to all the other designs too), is approx 2000mm tall in reality. This allows room for the extreme tallest person, and therefore can be used with ease. Within the model, it would be scaled down, therefore representing the height well. The staff desk is the correct height, with a lower height desk behind the visible surface of the desk in the design. This allows comfortable use and is very functional.

The bookshelves of this design are approx 1 shelf – 300-400mm – too tall. The average student would not be able to reach the top shelf. There is much room for movement within this corner, meeting the anthropometric data. The space would be easy to use and the relaxing area would be spacious and comfortable.

This corner of design 2 suits all the anthropometrics of the students very well. Again, the bookshelves are approx 1 shelf – 300-400mm – too tall. This would be change within the final design. In addition, the top shelf on the opposite wall would be too high. This should either be taken away or made lower. The design would be ergonomically suitable, because its spacious and therefore easy to move around in The table is the correct height of approx 1m.

The table is too close to the plat form (floor) stairs. If it was to be moved further back, no-one would be able to sit at the computers. Therefore, the platform needs to be wider –approx 1200mm wider. This would then take into account of all anthropometric data.

Does the design contain these main features?: Working Area for students and staff, Bookshelves, Beanbag/Relaxing Area, at least

2 Leaflet Holders?

---------- (See slide …)

This Library design contains all the necessary features apart from the leaflet holders, which I would add to the design. The leaflet holders would be square to compliment the rest of the design. There is a large space for students to study, and there is the required amount of space for lessons up to 30 pupils. There are 2 main relaxing or reading areas, which encourage students to use the Library. The same amount of space (compared to the current Haydon School Library), is used, which meets the specification. This design also includes computers, for any student to use at any time which the target market wanted. Even though the layout of this design is effective, it is spacious, allowing room for movement which is practical.

Would the design be safe to use in reality and in the model? Is there enough room for safe

movement?

There is a large amount of space for movement within the entrance and is therefore safe. Within the model, the components would be permanently attached to the base, therefore being safe and secure, easy to transport.

There is a minimum space of 1000mm between each bookshelf which is the required space needed for someone to walk down and look at the books with ease (unit A). However there needs to be more space between the beanbags and the bookshelves, therefore some beanbags may need to be taken away.

This corner of the design is very spacious due to the amount of floor space available for movement. This is therefore safe. However, the bookshelves are tall and yet have a thin width, which may cause it to be less stable. Within the model, all the component will be attached to the base, which is stable and easier to transport.

The platform here may be a tripping hazard, however the steps are small and therefore are unlikely to cause injury if someone falls down them! Again, within the model, these components would be attached to the base which is safe for the user and transportation.

Would the materials, processes and design used be safe for the architectural model? Would the

structures be stable, reliable and durable?

PVC is strong and tough and has a good abrasive resistance. The vacuum former, again, is safe if used correctly. The PVC and vacuum forming machine must not be touched when hot avoid injury. Corrugated card is impact resistant and therefore stable. It has excellent strength and can therefore be reliable for the structure of the model.

GRP is durable, very strong and tough and therefore reliable for the model structure. It is an excellent modelling material and is aesthetically pleasing. The laser cutter is safe if used correctly. It is very accurate and quick. Foil-lined board for the walls surface/finishing is very aesthetically pleasing.

Mounting board is very strong and rigid, therefore lasting a long time and being very reliable. HDPE is tough and heard wearing and would last a long time, therefore being reliable. The die cutting process is safe if used correctly. The user must keep their distance from the machine when it is in process.

Expanded Polystyrene has excellent impact resistance and is very durable. It would be able to with stand a lot of use and therefore is reliable. PS is also safe to use because it has a readily smooth surface which is fairly soft to touch. Care must be taken when using the laser cutter or a Stanley knife – this reduces risk of injury.

Do the designs for the Library suggest quality with precise and technical drawings? Is the layout of the design attractive, precise

and in proportion?

This design is more of a sketch, to give the general idea of the Library entrance. However, it has been drawn in proportion and is aesthetically pleasing due to the spacious layout. Therefore it is attractive (see 5 boxes above.) The security bars may be too long, however it does protect the Library property well.

This design hasn’t got the detail of the bookshelves, however there is an image above it. This shows the idea as a type of sketch. As said above, the colours and patterns don’t compliment each other as well as they could, therefore it isn’t attractive, however the quality is still there due to the precise and technical drawing.

This design suggests a lot of quality due to the precise drawing. It is very aesthetically pleasing and is therefore of a high quality. The layout is pleasing and practical, and takes into account anthropometric data.

The components in relation to each other and the wall structures etc. are all in proportion and therefore this design is precise and accurate. The detail of the computers is not seen, however the general idea is given. This design has quality due to the attractive and complimenting designs.

Does the layout of the design allow easy transportation of its

components and is it stably arranged?

---------- (See slide …)

The tables within this design as a whole are quite large and therefore wouldn’t be easy to transport. However, if the tables were made from lots of small tables, this would provide easier transportation. The bookshelves are made up of many square individual (book)shelves – see the bookshelf design (unit C1). These would be easy to move. In reality, this design would allow the tables to be moved out of the library, to provide space for extra activities that would need this space (e.g. Parents evening.) As a model, this design would be very transportable - all the components would be permanently attached to the base. The maximum size of the model would need to be 1000mm x 800mm – specification. This is fairly easy to transport and carry, however it may need 2 people to transport – this is Ok.

Was feedback asked for and given?

Students said that the entrance to the Library wasn’t much different to the current entrance. However, they liked the poster ideas as this would make the Library interesting and functional. They said the entrance looked spacious and therefore more relaxing and they would be able to study better in this sort of atmosphere – calming.

One student said that this layout was nice and exciting because of the linear forms and geometric shapes. Students said that this corner of the design was interesting, however it looked too busy and therefore the beanbag area wouldn’t be relaxing. It was exciting though.

The highly contrasting tones were thought to be very attractive, modern, different and fun. The geometric theme and layout was said to be complimenting and exciting. One student said that the large windows would let in lots of light, making the space spacious and would therefore keep her ‘awake’ as she studied!

Surprisingly, both genders liked this colour scheme. The deep purple made it attractive to all. However, one student said that the even though the platform was different and exciting, it was a very small space and there wouldn’t be much room for a lot of people. I could make the platform wider. The computer area was liked because people could work on the computers in a quiet environment, (unlike the ICT rooms!)

Specification Points cont. From last page –

same designsDesign 1.1 Design 1.2 Design 1.3 Design 1.4 Design 2.1 Design 2.2

Do the materials and processes (that

would be used within this design) use much energy or

need many resources? Are they

Environmentally Friendly?

Are the materials and processes sustainable to

future generations?

The MDF is produced from trees which are being cut down for the MDF and folding boxboard. This isn’t environmentally friendly because this isn’t sustainable and it uses up resources for future generations. However, Folding boxboard can be recycled, saving recourses and energy, therefore being more sustainable.

The Laser cutter would use a lot of energy due to the power needed. This uses up raw materials and therefore isn’t environmentally friendly. However the laser cutter would only be used a small amount of times and therefore won’t be so destroying. Again, the corriflute used within this design would also use up the raw material of wood/trees. Unless these are replanted once chopped down, it would be very unsustainable to future generations.

Acrylic’s raw material is oil which is a non-renewable resource. Therefore this is not sustainable as we are using up resources and materials for future generations. Acrylic is also non-biodegradable and will use up space within a landfill site and produce harmful gases and the Acrylic will last for years – not sustainable. However the use of Solid White Board can be recycled which is efficient and doesn’t waste materials. It saves resources and is therefore sustainable.

The structure of this design would be made from Recycled card which is very sustainable and environmentally friendly because it reuses materials. The Vacuum Former uses a lot of heat and therefore energy which is not environmentally friendly, however it is inexpensive. Again Polypropylene’s raw material is also oil which is a non-renewable resource. Therefore this is not sustainable as we are using up resources and materials for future generations.

Cartridge paper can be recycled, saving recourses and energy, therefore being more sustainable. The use of the scroll saw doesn’t use up a lot of energy and is therefore not so bad for the environmental as the laser cutter. Therefore this is a more sustainable way of cutting out the components. The Pine wood used within this design is produced from trees which are being cut down. This isn’t environmentally friendly because this isn’t sustainable and it uses up resources for future generations.

The use of foam board is very difficult to recycle due to the plastic surface, but foam/adhesive middle. This can cause problems when needing to separate the materials for recycling at the factory. However, the fact that the foam board can be recycled is environmentally friendly as it saves materials and resources for the future.

Would the design use its materials

efficiently or would materials and

energy be wasted in the process?

The shapes being cut out of the MDF and folding boxboard would use less recourses if they were cut out near the edge f the paper, rather than the middle. This saves materials. Completing the walls and certain components using the Laser Cutter reduces the amount of human errors, and therefore reduces materials being wasted. MDF also uses a lot of energy to produce form its raw material, not being environmentally friendly.

Again, not much material would be wasted because the laser cutter is accurate to cut out the components and therefore little error will be made and therefore minimal material would be wasted. If time is taken to accurately and precisely draw the shapes of the components/parts on the materials, again little errors would occur.

Acrylic is brittle and therefore care must be taken to make sure none of the Acrylic components break or snap as this would waste materials. Again the shapes being cut out of the Solid White board and Acrylic would use less recourses if they were cut out near the edge of the paper, rather than the middle. This saves materials.

The MDF jig for the vacuum former would have to be very accurate so as not to waste the PP materials, and therefore be more sustainable. The jig would have to have slanted edges, and rounded corners initially so the vacuum former can be accurate the first time.

The shapes being cut out of the Pine and acrylic and cartridge paper would use less recourses if they were cut out near the edge of the materials, rather than the middle. This saves materials.

The use of the Stanley knife can be difficult to get and accurate result, therefore more materials may be wasted. A lot of energy would have been needed to produced the foam board in the first place, using oils and raw materials. This isn’t sustainable or efficient. However, it can be recycled, therefore minimising and cancelling out some of the used energy.

Specification Points – interior designs Design 2.3 Design 3.1 Design 3.2 Design 3.3

Do the materials and processes (that would

be used within this design) use much

energy or need many resources? Are they

Environmentally Friendly?

Are the materials and processes sustainable to future generations?

The Vacuum Former uses a lot of heat and therefore energy which is not environmentally friendly. But even though the PVC plastic used within the vacuum former uses a lot of raw energy and resources to make it (un-sustainable,) the PVC can be easily recycled and identified due to the plastic coding system. This saves resources and materials.

The use of GRP within the design isn’t very sustainable because the raw material used to produce the material is oil which is non-renewable. IN addition, the adhesives used within the GRP aren’t healthy and can cause lung damage and pollute the air. The oil refinery's also pollute the air. This isn’t very environmentally friendly or sustainable and can contribute to global warming and destroying the planet.

The use of Die Cutting to cut the Mounting board within this design uses a lot of energy and isn't therefore environmentally friendly. The laser cutter would be more environmentally friendly because it doesn’t use so much energy for this one-off production of the model of the Library.

The Blow Moulding process in this design (for the PVC platform) is very expensive and uses a lot of energy and electricity and heat for this one-off production. Therefore the vacuum forming process would be more suitable as it doesn’t use as much energy or money for the small scale production. Again, the PVC and Vinyl come from oil which uses a lot of energy to extract and is a non-renewable resources, not being sustainable. But they can be recycled, cancelling out some of this used energy.

Would the design use its materials efficiently or would materials and energy be wasted in the

process?

The shapes being cut out of the variety of materials would waste less material if they were cut out near the edge of the material, rather than the middle. This saves materials. The blow moulding process would waste a lot of material as an expensive jig/former would have to be made for the process which uses up money and materials – not efficient especially for a one-off production. Also the use of the laser cutter means not a lot of material would be wasted because the laser cutter is accurate to cut out the components and therefore little error will be made and therefore minimal material would be wasted. The MDF jig for the vacuum former would have to be very accurate so as not to waste the PP materials, and therefore be more sustainable. The jig would have to have slanted edges, and rounded corners initially so the vacuum former can be accurate the first time.

Specification Points – 2-D element, Sign Sign Design 1 Sign Design 2 Sign Design 3 Sign Design 4 Sign Design 5 Sign Design 6

Does the sign perform its function

successfully?

This sign contains the title ‘Library’ and contains a few words on what the Library would be if you used it. This meets the specification. It is appealing and enticing due to the bright colours used.

The sign contains the title ‘Library’ and contains 3 words that describe the function of the Library. These words are bold, to the point and eye-catching. The sign also contains an image of the inside of the Library, enticing students within.

This sign is very attractive and enticing, therefore appealing to students and attracting them to Library. The text says the name of the Library and gives a little information on what the Library is for. This meets the specification and performs its function well.

The single 5 words to the right of the sign are abstract due to the non straight positioning and precise lettering. These are easily read and bold, attracting students to read them, in turn letting the students know what the Library does – meeting the function.

This last sign design isn’t very functional, found from feedback. The sign does contain the title ‘Library’, however it doesn’t contain an image of the inside of the Library. I would add this in the developed design. The sign contains 3 words that are simple and catchy – study, relax and Learn, which is the function of the interior of the Library, therefore meeting the specification.

The function of the signs are to attract students to the Library and give them information about it. This sign does this. It is bright and attractive due to the warm and comfortable colours used. The lettering is wide and bold, as preferred from the questionnaire. It contains a phrase about the Library function, however the meaning is not entirely clear, which is in a way an advantage because students will want enter the Library to find out more.

Do the colours, styles and patterns

of the sign compliment, relate closely and contain at least some of the

designs of the inside of the

Library? Are they appealing to

students of 11-18, both genders?

The colours and geometric squares compliment the interior of the Library of design 3.2. This meets the specification. The sign is attractive due to the bright greens and contrasting tones. This appeals to the students, both genders due to the green colour and geometric shape.

The colours are more attractive to the female audience due to the deep purples and light pinks. However, the pattern and style is attractive to both genders due to the geometric shapes. I could use a different colour scheme, perhaps turquoise or orange, as this was preferred from the questionnaire in Unit A.

This sign compliments interior design 2.2 very well. The same wall pattern is used, and the table design is used as the border of this design. This links to the interior very well and meets the specification. The bold and nearly clashing colours are attractive and modern and attract all students of both genders. From feedback, the sign attracts 12-16 the most due to the primary colours. If I added more tone or different colours, it might attract all ages.

The shape of this sign comes from the wallpaper of interior design 2.1. This shape is abstract and futuristic, and therefore according to the students is very attractive. The different blue tones are interesting and compliment the interior design well. This sign is appealing both genders and ages.

Students said it wasn’t attractive because the colours were dull and not exciting. The stripes were said to be interesting due to the variety however. I would change the background colour to be bright and modern and therefore appealing. The circle shape of the design was found to be normal and therefore not interesting and students said it didn’t compliment the middle pattern. For the developed design I would make the shape form around the middle pattern – relate.

This sign doesn’t relate to the interior of design 1 as closely because the lettering is very different to the ‘curved in’ style. However, the shape of the sign and colours compliment the interior of design 1 well. The bubble lettering, from feedback, only appeals to 11-15’s because it is a younger style. The alternative lettering style was preferred (see design – unit c1). I will use this in the developed sign instead.

Is the font clear, simple, readable? In reality, would it be able to be read at

least 5 meters away?

The font isn’t as clear as it could be because the deep font colour doesn’t contrast well with the deep background. The lettering could be white to stand out from the deep green backgrounds or the deep blue lettering could have a white glow around it for effect and contrast. The lettering probably needs to be larger to be read clearly.

The font is very clear and simple to read due to the straight and simple edges. This is effective however, and compliments the geometric patterns. The colour of the text could change, perhaps to white, so it stands out more from the deep background, and would therefore certainly be read from 5 meters away.

The title ‘Haydon Library’ is large in relation to the sign size and is therefore very clear to read. The red and deep purple lettering is bold and attractive. This meets the specification. The letter style compliments the rest of the sign and also the interior of the Library. The font would be read from 5 meters away in reality.

The single words to the right of the sign are very clear and readable as they stand out from the background and are simple and bold. However, the ‘Library’ 3-D text isn’t as readable because the outline isn’t as bold and the font isn’t simple or clear. This is because it is unique font. I should use a more common font so it is easily readable. The colour of the font is contrasting however.

The font is clear simple and readable due to the thin lettering and bold outlines. The colouring of the font is deep and dark, which contrasts well with the pale background. The word ‘Library’ would be easily read from 5 meters away, however the smaller individual words may not be so easily read. I could make them larger or make the outlines thicker and therefore bolder.

The font, however, is clear and readable due to the bold, black outline and clear font. It would be able to be read from at least 5 meters away in reality. The text is to the point and tells students exactly what the room behind the sign is – a Library!

Does the sign include the name of

the Library?Does the sign also

include an image of the inside of the Library to attract students within?

The Sign does include images of the interior of the Library. At the moment, this is only my drawn perspective design. Once this has been developed on the computer, this image would be used instead on the model. However, the images used are contrasting and attractive due to the attractive interior, therefore enticing students to use the Library.

The sign includes the name ‘Library’, meeting the specification. This lets students know what the room behind the sign is. The sign includes an image of the inside of the Library, which if the colour scheme was changed, would entice the students within. The image compliments the design, style and colours of the sign.

The Sign does include images of the interior of the Library. This attracts students to the Library and lets them know what the interior looks like. Images of design 2.2 are used which are bold and appealing, therefore enticing students within the Library. The images compliment the sign.

The Sign does include images of the interior of the Library. The images used are contrasting and attractive due to the attractive interior, therefore enticing students to use the Library. The word ‘Library’ is used however, it isn’t very large and may not be read easily. When developed the text can be made larger in relation to the sign.

‘Library’ repeated 3 times on this sign to give emphasis and effect. It is effective, however it isn’t needed. The sign doesn’t contain an image of the inside of the Library. I would add this in the developed design. An image is needed to let students know what the interior looks like, otherwise the students are unaware of the contents and won’t be attracted inside. If the inside is attractive, the image will be too and so will the sign.

The sign does included an image of the inside of the Library, and I have included the possibility of an image of a student working within. This lets students know what the Library is like to work in. It also lets the students see the function of the Library – e.g. Study, reading etc. This will attract students within so they can experience it for themselves.

From the feedback given and also from reviewing each design, I chosen to further develop design 1, however taking certain elements from design 2 to improve design 1 and make it more functional. For example, the bookshelves in design 2 are more practical and functional as they are easier to use. Design 1 needs more bookshelves, so I could use design 2 ideas to do this. In addition, design 1 has no specific area for class lessons, whereas design 2 does. So I’m going to use element from both. But, design 1 will be the base because it is attractive to the students and appealing. This is because the shapes and patterns and layout are unique and fun, making study more relaxing – function.

I’m also going to take either the colours and patterns of design 1.4, 2.1, 2.2 or 3.2, for the interior Library designs. These were most preferred by the students due to their abstract and contrasting colours and tones. The colours used in all these designs are bold and eye-catching, therefore fun, different and exciting, also making using the Library enticing. These colours, patterns and styles were most popular in the questionnaire also. I’m going to use a variety of materials that work best, functionally, stably and aesthetically. From the review I can see that Foam Board, MDF or Acrylic are most suitable for the structure of the model and its components because they are aesthetically pleasing, stable and durable, therefore lasting a long time and having quality.

Also from the feedback, and the review, I have decided to develop Sign designs 3, 4 and 6. I am going to use different aspects from each to create the desired design that it both aesthetically pleasing and functional, being attractive and appealing to the students and therefore enticing them into the Library. Depending on the colour scheme and patterns used, any of these sign design shapes could be used.

Specification Points - cont.

From last page – same designs

Sign Design 1 Sign Design 2 Sign Design 3 Sign Design 4 Sign Design 5 Sign Design 6

Is the sign safe?

Would the sign be a max size

of 200mmx70mm, for the model?

Each square of this 3 part sign would be 40mmx40mm for the model, which together would be 120mmx40mm which is within the limit. This allows the sign to be readable, clear and attractive. It wouldn’t be too heavy for the structure either.

Within the model, this sign would be 150mmx50mm. This makes it visible, attractive and easier to make due the parts being of a larger size. The sign would be safe due to the geometric and straight edged shape, however the corners and edges of the sign would either need to be rounded or sanded very smooth. This reduces injury risks.

This sign would be a size of 100mmx60mm, which is large enough to be attractive and bold enough for the size of the Library structure (1000mmx800mm). However, it isn’t too large that the sign is heavy for the stricture either.

This sign would be a max size of 180mmx 60mm at one end, 30mm at the other. This makes it visible, attractive and easier to make due the parts being of a larger size. The sign would be safe due to the geometric and straight edged shape, however the corners and edges of the sign would either need to be rounded or sanded very smooth. This reduces injury risks.

This sign is probably the most safe design due to the full circular shape, and therefore no sharp pointed edges. The sides must still however be smooth to prevent injury. If the design was to be painted on the MDF, the paint has many fumes and VOC’s and therefore isn’t good for health. A face mask might need to be worn.

This sign would be 110mmx55mm which is large enough to be attractive and bold enough for the size of the Library structure (1000mmx800mm). However, it isn’t too large that the sign is heavy for the stricture either. The text would be able to be read easily and clearly. It would still function properly. However, the corners of this design are sharp as they come to a point. They would need to be rounded and smooth down to limit injury.

Do the designs for the sign

suggest quality with precise and technical drawings and

designs? Is the sign

Aesthetically pleasing and attractive?

This sign doesn’t suggest a lot of quality due to the rough outlines of the font/lettering. The different greens within one square are difficult to distinguish, however when developed on the computer, the outlines would be precise and therefore clear and aesthetically pleasing.

This sign is aesthetically pleasing. Your eye is drawn to the large text ‘Library’, and then the rectangular shapes (starting with the blue rectangle) draw your eye around the whole sign. This is a pleasing composition and therefore has a high quality. Each shape has a bold and clear outline.

This sign is very aesthetically pleasing and of high quality. The design is bold and the sketch has clear and precise outlines. I have used a number of different research ideas – my own sketches, images etc. Which gives quality to the design. As said above, the bold colours and abstract curves against the geometric straight edges is interesting and very attractive and modern.

This sign design is of a high quality due to the many tones used. The edges are precise and clear and the text readable. The colour scheme is aesthetically pleasing. The design is very simple yet very attractive and effective.

Even though this sign isn’t attractive or appealing, the design does suggest quality due to the precise outlines, accurate and in-proportion components. The colours are consistent and the colours individually are aesthetically pleasing. I would perhaps change the background colour to a green or light blue to compliment better with the rest of the sign and Library interior.

This sketch design suggests quality due to the precise, accurate and bold outlines. The colours are consistent and eye-catching. This makes the design aesthetically pleasing and very attractive and appealing. The warm colours give a comfortable and excited feel to the sign and therefore Library interior.

Are the materials used

for the sign durable and

reliable? Would the materials

last a long time, have consistent strength?

GRP is very strong and rigid, therefore lasting longer and being durable. Because GRP would be durable it would also be reliable, and is very unlikely to snap or break. Vinyl is very flexible and the adhesive back is permanent, therefore being reliable to last for a long time attached to the GRP.

PP is rigid and lightweight, therefore being durable and less likely to break. Due to the little weight, the sign would attach to the model structure within difficulty. The PP with vinyl lettering would be durable and would last a long time.

Foam board is very impact resistant, therefore durable and resisting a lot of damaging use. Foam board is also lightweight, therefore not weighing the model down. Foam board is reliable and has consistent strength due to the surface material of plastic. The foil lined board is very strong and has an excellent quality surface, therefore being durable and aesthetically pleasing – meeting the specification.

Corriflute is impact resistant therefore durable and resisting a lot of damaging use. However, Corriflute can bend quite easily due to the separating columns within the plastic surface. This isn’t as durable or reliable. Foam board or perhaps mounting board would be more suitable and perhaps more aesthetically pleasing also - according to the feedback.

MDF has consistent strength because it has no grain. MDF is very strong, rigid and tough and therefore is durable and reliable. It would last a long time, being able to withstand ‘rough’ use. The paint (for the design) would protect the MDF underneath, however the paint could chip easily, therefore not lasting long. Vinyl is more reliable and hard wearing.

Acrylic is very durable and can last a long time. However, it’s not very reliable (or consistent in strength.) because it has low scratch resistance and is very brittle. However, the folding boxboard covering of the sign would strengthen the Acrylic more so would therefore last longer and the sign would be more reliable.

Was feedback asked for and

given?

One really liked this design because the geometric squares were effective. The greens were bright and attractive. Another student thought that the separate squares were ‘cool’ and different.

Surprisingly, students liked the colour scheme of this sign because they complimented each other. However, I got feedback that there needed to be more boldness, and there needed to be one certain aspect that stood out more than the rest.

A lot of people liked this sign design because they said it was abstract and unique. However, I few people did comment that it was too busy and the text to the right appeared to be squashed in. However, when designing this sign on the computer, the text could be made smaller and more clear. I could also lose the squares around the ‘Haydon Library’ text as these appear quite random.

A few students thought that this sign was too plain because there was too much writing. The single words on the right looked too random and busy. One person suggested I included more images and another person said to make the text straight. There were however a few people who also did like this sign because the tonal blues were interesting and ‘funky’.

This sign seemed to appeal to both genders the most because of the bright yellows and oranges, with the neutral background. They said it was bright and bold and stood out. It would catch their eye as they were walking along the corridor they said. This would then persuade them to enter the Library. One person also said that this design was ‘funky’ due to the bubble writing.

I was surprised that some people liked this sign because it was very different to the other designs. Someone said it reminded them of a car. One student said that this sign design was ‘pretty cool’ because of the striped pattern in the middle. They said it made you think about it – it would make them think abut actually entering the Library, when before they wouldn’t want to.

UNIT C3For the final design for the inside layout of the Haydon School Library, I took different elements from each of the 3 designs, that worked best (according to the review C2) and combined them in different ways, along with new aspects of the design to produce this final layout plan below. I have also used different line thicknesses (within the design below) to add depth to the design. This also allows the viewer to see which components have more of a height to them.

I have used the curved and circular bookshelves and beanbags from design 1. This is exciting and unique for the students aged 11-18. I took the same idea for the arrangement of the straight bookshelves from deign 3. Within the right-hand side section of the Library (shown below) the bookshelves are positioned with different lengths and this creates an interesting and attractive design. There are more bookshelves included within this design, to hold the correct number of books. The bookshelves are also grouped into sections, therefore providing areas for different topics of books.

The design is spacious, allowing room to move, and all the dimensions and layout of the components fit the ergonomics and anthropometric data of the students.

There is a sliding door that sections of the back of the library (the right-hand side shown below,) which would allow lessons to take place without disturbance. This section is also on a raised platform, which is different and interesting.

I received feedback about this layout design from a few different students. All liked the design, and said it was ‘funky’ and very different. They said it would make the Library more fun and appealing due to the unique and abstract shapes and composition. One person thought this design would function a lot better than the current Library, and also the previous designs I had, due to the extra bookshelf space, the smaller tables for smaller group work, and also the few computers for study.

The base has a groove (or rabbet joint) around the whole outside rim, the same thickness as the material of the walls (MDF and Acrylic). This acts as a guideline and allows the walls to fit into place, with an increased gluing area. It is also aesthetically pleasing. 3mm MDF would be used as this is easily shaped, has its own surface finish, and is aesthetically pleasing. It also comes in many sizes. The Acrylic represents reality well (windows) and allows the user to view the inside layout of the model from a different angle. The laser cutter would be used to cut the shapes of the Acrylic and MDF because it is accurate and quick. The CNC Router, CAD machine, would be used to cut the grooves within the wood as this is also accurate and pleasing.The acrylic could be cut using the scroll saw, and smoothed down, however this isn’t as accurate. Acrylic will be used for the ‘windows’ and inside walls because this best represents the glass in reality and also allows the viewer to view the model at another angle! Acrylic is strong and durable and easily cut into shape, either with the laser cutter or a scroll saw. Acrylic however can be brittle, but at the small scale of this model its not as likely to break. The window panes/separations would be shown on the acrylic surface by engraving it on using the laser cutter. This is unique and adds detail.

As part of my Final design for the inside of the Haydon School Library, I needed to know how I would produce the architectural, scaled down, model of the design. Here, I have produced an exploded, 3-D, drawing of the shell structure of the Library, with its base and walls. It shows the details of how each component can be fitted/joined to the next. The lid/roof of the model would be very similar, if not the same as the base of the model, which would also fit the walls and dimensions. This lid would be able to be lifted off the model, for a clearer view of the inside layout.Each wall would join to the next using a Mitre joint. This would be aesthetically pleasing due to no end grain, and would be strong due to the increased gluing area. However, this would be very difficult and timely to produce, so perhaps butt joints would be more suited. In addition, the far left wall on the main exploded drawing above, and the MDF wall (shown higher in the exploded drawing) would also be able to be lifted off the model, for a clearer view of the inside. This would be produced through the use of a (dado) or groove, the same width as the thickness of the acrylic/wood within the sides of the walls next to them.

Clear Acrylic

MDF – 3mm

Whole to represent small window

Clear Acrylic representing window

Entrance

Gap/whole to represent exit doorEngraved (with laser cutter)

to represent window panes

Groove, produced with CNC

router

Temporary joint –

groove/slotDado joint, produced using CNC

router.

In colour – materials. MDF wood and clear

Acrylic

I then added the inside walls into the exploded drawing. The doors to the computer room and the staff office would be shown just by having a gap where the door would be. This is simple and clear to the user. These inside walls would also slot into grooves within the base of the model. This keeps the walls secure and in position. Wood glue would be used to permanently attach the MDF walls to the base and Contact Adhesive would be used to attach the Acrylic to the MDF base as this joins dissimilar materials. In reality, these inside walls would be made from Glass. This makes the Library seem more spacious. The glass walls give a relaxed, calm and modern feel to the place.

In the initial layout, this curved bookshelf was laid out as shown on the left. However, after producing the 3-D layout, I have seen that the bookshelves are too close to each other and to the glass wall on the right. This wouldn’t leave enough room for move ability or comfortable working. Therefore I moved the bookshelves and their tables further apart. This also makes the design more spacious.

The sides of the curved bookshelf would be produced from card – folding boxboard – because it is strong and flexible, therefore producing the curved sides well. The pattern of the bookshelf would be printed and stuck onto the folding boxboard (available in school and good printing surface) to show the function of the bookshelf. This gives variety to the model.

Looks more aesthetically pleasing with the inner triangular column.

I then added started designing the inside components to the design. Each components would be made individually and then attached to the base of the model permanently with either wood glue/PVA or Contact Adhesive, depending on the material of the component. This would be quick and accurate. However, the components would only be attached to the model once all the floor and wall graphics have been applied first (see next few slides for details.) The materials for the components are explained within the next few slides with the coloured/patterned designs.

The layout is aesthetically pleasing and attractive due to the unique patterns and styles of the individual components within the Library area. This layout will attract the students of Haydon School as it is modern, exciting and different. This will encourage them to use the Library, relaxing while learning.

I then started adding the graphics to the interior design of the Library. In total I have 3 different interior designs, each taken from my initial ideas in C2. This would let me visually see which design looks best, meets the specification and attracts the student target market. I can then use these graphics and design colours for the model of the Library. I will print the graphics and designs onto ordinary paper and stick it to the MDF walls. However, this isn’t as aesthetically pleasing or as durable as Folding Boxboard, therefore this material would be more suitable, but this is very difficult to print on at school. The paper covering would protect the MDF underneath and it would also cover the burnt surface of the MDF from the laser cutter. I will also paint the outside of the model in a solid colour (e.g. white) to make it more pleasing to look at and to protect the MDF underneath again.

The thinner stripes are more appealing to the students as they appear more sophisticated than the thicker stripes. The lighter floor colouring below best compliments the waved design and would make the Library appear more spacious due to the light. However, I think that the darker floor colouring is more suited to the older students. However, when I received feedback, the lighter floor was preferred as it was thought to be more attractive and spacious.

I tried a variety of different ways to colour the patterned tables within the right section of the Library. The bottom right was too confusing and the composition wasn’t pleasing due to the random colour positioning. The bottom left was too plain due to the single colour, however it is neat. Feedback revealed that the top right colour positioning was most preferred because it was neat, pleasing and attractive. It also incorporated all the colours within the wall design above.

The bookshelf design on the left is more attractive due to the inner sections being of a different material and therefore colour. This creates a pleasing pattern and is unique and interesting. The inner sections would be made from MDF as this is easily shaped and has its own surface finish. The blue would be blue Acrylic as this is rigid and strong and has a high visual impact.

I produced the outline for this wallpaper design within 2-D design as this was accurate and quick. I then transferred these outlines to Photoshop, where I chose complimenting colours to create the coloured design. Within the model, the wallpaper and floor designs would be printed onto folding boxboard and attached/stuck to the MDF walls because this has a n excellent printing surface, is durable and protects the wood underneath. It is accurate to print.

I added in the graphics, colours and patterns to the Library design. I used the ideas from initial design 2.2 from C1 as these were fun, unique and attractive to the students, as found from the feedback. I used Sketch Up as it shows a 3-D perspective of the design which can be viewed from all angles. It is a clear representation of what the model would look like. The materials however can’t be seen very clearly. Even though the main colours are primary, they are sophisticated due to the yellow being pale, nearly cream, and the blues and reds being a slightly deeper shade than a child’s primary colour. The wooden floor is also attractive because it’s light, but neat and very attractive. It makes the space spacious and more relaxed.

The Bookshelves, and tables would be produced from MDF because it is a good modelling material. It is aesthetically pleasing and can be easily shaped to the small required pieces of the components. The sides and shelves of the bookshelves would be produced separately (cut using the scroll saw) and stuck together using PVA or wood glue. The table ‘tops’ and bases would be cut out and the correct height Dowel piece would be used for the middle leg/poles.

MDF top and dowel legs as this best represents the tables in reality and is a quick, yet pleasing way to create the tables. The coloured square patterns on the table top would be created using Vinyl because this is durable and has a high visual impact. Vinyl is easily cut to shape also and because it has its own adhesive on the underneath, can be easily applied to anywhere.

These shelves would be produced from coloured Acrylic. They would be attached to walls using a slit within the MDF wall that would allow for one side of the shelf to slot into. This is accurate, yet time consuming.

This darker material would be produced either by using MDF and painting the surface to create the darker colour and texture. Or it would be Foam Board as this is easily shaped into this unique shape and the surface texture is pleasing. Again, the darker colour would either be painted onto the foam board or printed onto paper and stuck to the Foam Board.

This darker material however would have to be produced from Styrofoam and shaped into this solid curved structure. Styrofoam is an excellent modelling material because it is easily shaped and can be used for small intricate pieces also. It would be painted to create the darker wood appearance.

With the second coloured design, I chose the blue and turquoise design from initial design 2.1 in C1. This is attractive and from the feedback received the students thought the colours were attractive due to being bright. I created the wallpaper designs to the left first within 2D design as it was easy and accurate to create the shapes and then this was transferred into Photoshop . I used the paintbrush tool to create the different shades and blends of blue colours. I used different opacities of these colours to allow them to blend into each other smoothly. I then used the ………. Effect over the whole design (the right design) for a slight rippling effect. This is attractive and adds variety.

With the wallpaper applied to the design, I then experimented with the flooring. The far right and adjacent flooring best suit the colours due to the light neutral tones of the wooden floor. This has a relaxed look to it and makes the room appear more spacious. The second from right flooring has slight tones of turquoise within the dark blue colours, making it complimenting with the wall design. I chose this flooring because it was different and the carpet would make the Library quieter.

I experimented with the shapes and sizes of the wall design, to see which would be more visually impacting. I chose to use the bottom left design because this was more sophisticated and appeared more like a pattern. The lighter design was too pale and would attract the female audience more than the male, which doesn’t meet my specification.

I chose the darker tone of blue for these leaflet holders because it gave variety to the tones and colour used within this design. It was complimenting to the lighter blue also.

For the tables I chose the design with the wooden rim firstly because this complimented the bookshelves well, and also because it would be easier to produce these tables from MDF with wooden dowels for the legs, than coloured Acrylic.

For the right section of the Library I chose to use the left wall designs because the right appeared to be too overwhelming with too many shapes and colours. The left is more relaxed and not as distracting, therefore helping the students to study more. With the lighter colour also, it makes the Library more spacious and calm.

Both of these colour/material layouts would be suitable as they both compliment the colour scheme and layout of this design. However, I chose to use the top design (just the single MDF material) as this would be easier to produce within the model because it is easier to cut and shape. Also, with the blue bookshelves the eye doesn’t quite know where to look when viewing the whole of this design. This could be overwhelming with random colour. The single coloured bookshelves is also more simple and calming, however not as suitable for students.

This page shows the final design for design 2, from different angles. The floor of this design is quite plain due to the deep tone and single colour, however it compliments all the colours and styles within the rest of the design. It is more attractive to the male audience due to the deep blue tones and geometric shapes and styles (e.g. the wallpaper design.) This therefore doesn’t meet the specification as well as it could. I completed this design within Google sketch up again because it clearly represents what the final model will look like, and this design can be viewed from many angles. This design is more attractive also for the older students as the design is simple, neat and the shapes are easily distinguished.

The wallpaper would be printed onto Solid White board because this is strong, rigid and has an excellent printing surface, therefore more aesthetically pleasing. This would then in turn be attached to the MDF wall structure. This protects the wood and gives the model a pleasing finish.

The flooring of this design would be carpet within reality. Within the model however, this would be clearly represented by printing the carpet texture onto thick Cartridge paper as this has a slight texture. Cartridge paper is also strong and would protect the underneath MDF wood base well.

This curved platform (and also the light blue toped table, and blue leaflet holders in the corners of the room,) would be produced from Acrylic (3mm) because it is durable and very aesthetically pleasing. It is also easily available in school. The shapes would be cut using the scroll saw as this is quick, however it may not be as accurate as the laser cutter. The curved platform may have 2 acrylic layers to show it is a raised platform and to be in proportion with the rest of the model.

The teachers desk (and the curved bookshelves) would be created using Styrofoam because this is an excellent modelling material because it can be shaped easily, and it is also lightweight. The Styrofoam would be painted to create an aesthetically pleasing finish and to represent the MDF material (and top blue) well.

These tables would be produced from MDF with the coloured tops produced from PP because this is thin, rigid and lightweight and would show the bright blue tones well. The MDF would be sanded down to allow the PP squares to fit into the sanded down spaces. This creates a smooth surface and is more aesthetically pleasing and professional. The legs would be made from dowels cut to size, because this is a suitable size.

This raided platform is the relaxed reading area. This would be produced from Vacuum Formed Polypropylene (with an MDF mould) because PP is lightweight, rigid and has a smooth pleasing surface finish. Vacuum forming is ideal to produce the steps. Only a small angle would be needed which doesn’t show in the overall look of the model. Vacuum forming is accurate and precise. The MDF model would be produced using the scroll saw and sanded down for the curved corners and slight slanted sides. This is time consuming however can be accurate is made well.

These square bookshelves would be produced using Plywood only, and the blue shelves would be painted with the correct blue colour. This would protect the underneath wood and would be pleasing to look at. The Plywood is available in school and has a high strength and stiffness. It is impact resistant also. Plywood is available in thin widths (3mm) for the thin width of the shelves. The sides and shelves would be cut out separately using the Laser cutter as this is accurate and can produce multiple copies of the same shapes. The parts would be assembled using wood glue and held in place to dry.

This was the third preferred colour scheme/design from C1, from the feedback and reviews given. The contrasting black and white geometric shapes is impacting and unique, attractive to the students. The green colour was also liked, however feedback suggested the green colour needed to be slightly darker tones to compliment the black and white more.

Above, are 4 designs for the walls and floors that compliment each other well for this design. I used the top left design for the floor as I thought this was impacting and very different to any of my other designs. It was modern and surreal for a floor, appealing to students. The bottom left wall design was only used for 2 very small wall sections, because otherwise it was hard to distinguish the different component shapes, and it made the room/space very dark and not at all relaxing or attractive. The other 2 designs were attractive for the walls. The light tones make the Library look spacious and relaxing, the green adding variety to contrasting white and black.

I chose to use the left design layout for this design because I felt the right had too much green to compliment the floor. It was too plain and simple for the surreal floor. The left design incorporated the black and white into the walls, complimenting the floor. The green wall then complimented the curved green platform in the middle of the floor.

I chose the middle floor layout/design of the 3 above because it was more sophisticated than the large squares on the left, which were too large and not a sophisticated. The right floor design, the squares were too small and this would be very overwhelming when walking into the Library. It would be too busy and unattractive. It would also distract from study.

From these 2 floor layouts below, I chose the left, with the green platformed floor section because this would be attractive and interesting. This large platform would add variety to the space and be exciting for the students. The green colour compliments the far wall design and also the green toped tables and curved platform design. The eye has a triangular point to look at for the green and is therefore a good composition, and not too overwhelming. The right floor would be too distracting as the whole Library would be geometric black and white. This stops you from knowing where to look also. It would be too confusing.

This page shows the final design for design 3, from different angles. The design is very complimenting even though the colours are quite contrasting. I think this is mainly to do with the green platformed floor also. The green colour calms the ‘wacky’ look of the floor and makes the design pleasing to look at. The geometric square shapes, also contrast slightly to the curved component designs, however this is quite pleasing and unique. I completed this design within Google sketch up, and different views are shown here (of the same design) so it is easier to see the design from an all round perspective.

The floor and wallpaper of this design would be painted onto the MDF base as this would protect the wood underneath and would make the model more durable. The paint however, would take a long time to complete and dry and won’t be as accurate as printing it onto Folding Boxboard, which has an excellent printing surface and is durable. However, this is hard to print onto within school, therefore normal paper may have to be used instead, which isn't as durable, and then stuck onto folding boxboard, which is in turn attached to the MDF. This would be more time consuming, however would have a pleasing appearance once finished.

This green platformed floor (and also the black platformed floor) would be produced from Vacuum Formed Rigid Polystyrene. Vacuum forming is quick and accurate, providing the MDF mould is also made accurately. Polystyrene is rigid and lightweight, however also very strong and durable, an excellent material for a platform which will have other components resting on its surface.

These tables would be produced from Plywood because this material is available in school and has a high strength and stiffness. It is impact resistant also. Plywood is available in thin widths (3mm) for the thin width of the tables. The legs of the tables would be produced from small pieces of Plywood, cut to size and shape - square. The black and white squares would be produced from paint, which not only gives an attractive finish but also protects the plywood. The rest of the plywood table would be finished in varnish to also protect the wood.

This bookshelf would also be produced from Plywood for the same reasons (above). The middle sections would be produced from MDF however, due to their non parallel sides. The MDF would be easily sanded down to this correct shape. However these middle sections/book stoppers would be time consuming and difficult to produce at such a small scale, therefore I might not make them all. The middle section of this bookshelf would be produced from a thick Dowel, as this would keep all the shelves together.

These round tables (and also the maze shape table in the distance) would also be produced from Plywood, to compliment the other components. The middle leg however would be produced from a single dowel as this is strong and rigid and is a suitable size for the model. The green top would again be painted on, and finished with varnish to create an aesthetically pleasing appearance.

This green curved platform would be produced from foam board as it is the correct thickness for the platform and is aesthetically pleasing. Foam board is readily available in school and is a suitable modelling material. The green would be produced from printing the green colour onto folding boxboard and gluing it to the foam board base.

The shelves of this bookshelf would be produced from Acrylic because this is durable and has excellent aesthetic properties. They would be attached to the Acrylic inner wall, using Tensol Cement as this is fast drying and very strong. The shelves would have to be accurately held in place which could be difficult to achieve but is not impossible.

These bookshelves would be made in the same way as the tables above. The middle white shelves would still be plywood, but the white colour would be painted on.

This teachers desk would be created from Card (Folding Boxboard – like the curved bookshelves) because the flexibility of this card means the curved sides can be created easily and accurately. The design of the wood material (plywood) would be suggested on the card by printing the texture onto its surface.

Design 1 Design 2 Design 3

Student Aged 15 - Male He thought design 1 looked like a normal Library however because of the wooden floor.

preferred design 3 due to the colours. He said the bright green against the black and white was ‘cool’. He said it really appealed to him and it looked more like a place where students can go and relax as well as learning.

Student aged 14 - Female Chequered floor was very different and unique, however they thought it might hurt your eyes if your in the Library for too long due to the repeated geometric shapes and completely contrasting colours and tones.

Student aged 18 - Female Attractive due to the sophisticated layout of the colours and shapes. She thought it was ‘funky’ and exciting, but not too over the top.

Looks quite boring due to the dark blue colours and the deep floor. Looks much like an office, which isn’t attractive to students!

Had a lot going on within it, which she thought was down to the chequered floor.

Student aged 18 - Female Preferred this design due to the different tones of blue. But perhaps the floor is too dark – it may make the room look smaller.

I like the raised platrform. Maybe you could add this to design 2. Perhaps a darker green is needed so its not so distracting against the dark black.

Student aged 18 – FemaleOverall, the designs look very attractive, however maybe the

tables at the far end are too crowded.

I prefer this design because its ‘studios’ looking with the wooden floor.

This would probably be my favourite with a wooden floor however, as this floor is too distracting.

Student aged 17 - Male I like this colour scheme with the different blues. I don’t like this colour scheme as much as the 2nd design. Bt the overall layout is ‘cool’. But I’m not too sure about the green coloured floor because it is a bit different and strange. It doesn’t go with the design as well.

Student aged 16 - Female I like this design best because its neutral which is probably best for a Library. This design is amazing with the wooden floor. Its a calm and relaxed design.

I think this floor is too ‘wild’ and you wouldn’t be able to concentrate properly.

Student aged 14 - Male This design is my favourite because its relaxed and spacious. This design is really cool, but maybe too much for a Library. The black and white squares are too distracting. The floor also looks a bit like a bathroom floor!

Student aged 13 - Male I’m not too sure about this design because I think girls would like it more. But I like the different colours used.

I really like this design because the blue is a ‘cool’ colour and I like the dark floor – its different but looks good in the Library.

I also really like this design because its really ‘cool.’ I like the patterns and colours. I would use the Library more often if it were like this.

I then received feedback of all 3 designs above, from students aged 11-18 within Haydon school. These students know the current Library and therefore they would know which design is more attractive to our Library and also more appealing to them.

Design 1 Design 2 Design 3

The 3rd design received the most feedback because I think it was more eye catching than the others due to the very different and unique contrasts. However, this wasn’t the most preferred design because even though students thought it was ‘cool’ it was said that it wasn’t suitable for the Library and would be too distracting – even if the floor design was used for the walls instead according to one student. The 1st design was preferred due to its sophisticated, relaxed and calm design, perhaps mainly due to the neutral tones with the bright colours involved within. This design also appeared more spacious and the shapes were seen clearer. The second design was also liked but not as much as the first. I will therefore develop this 1st design further into a final design, incorporating some of the preferred design aspects from the 2nd and 3rd designs also. This will create an attractive design for the students, which meets the specification.

I then moved on to developing design idea 1, to create an improved design. I combined the initial 3 designs to create this developed design. I used the variety of blue tones from design 2, but the same patterns and shapes of design 1. The colours now appeal to both genders, and the styles and patterns are still modern, unique and fun, appealing to the students.

I started off by changing the colours of the wallpaper, which would make it easier to then change the colours of the whole design. I used lighter tones of blue, keeping some of the yellow and red within the design to keep it modern and appealing. However, I felt that this was more appealing to females and therefore I took away the yellow I used a darker blue instead. This then attracted both genders, and the colours were more sophisticated.

I felt that the brown platform on the left didn’t quite compliment and match the blue tones as well as it could. Therefore I created a brown that had a tinge of blue within it, but still keeping the brown tone to match the floor and MDF components. This allowed the platform to compliment the design and therefore make the whole design and library more aesthetically pleasing.

I also used the raised platform idea from initial design 3, within this developed design, because it was interesting and the students liked this aspect because it was different to the design. I tried out different flooring for this raised platform including a plain blue tone, however this didn’t compliment the design and was too bright for the floor (distracting.) So I chose either carpet material (left) or wooden (right.) Both compliment the design well due to the pale and neutral tones. The wooden floor allows the whole design to flow, whereas the carpet design sections off the Library into 2 parts. In reality, the carpet would be quieter for study, and the wooden floor would be more durable. I am going to use the wooden area because from student feedback, this is what they most preferred because it looked more modern and went well with the rest of the design.

When I received feedback for this developed design, the students did like this new design because it took in all the good aspects of the initial designs. The tones were apparently eye-catching and were sophisticated. It appealed to them.

However, when I received feedback from the students, the majority of them still preferred the initial design 1. They said it was more fun and modern due to the almost clashing and unique colours. They said it would also attract them more to the Library because the colours and designs stood out. They liked the raised platform idea, so I included this within design 1. However I couldn’t improve the design any more, without changing the colours which the students liked and wanted me to keep. Therefore, even though I have developed the design, I will use the initial colours of Design 1 as this meets the specification more due to attracting the students.

‘Outer Glow’ and ‘Drop Shadow’ used for the main title text to make it stand out – more eye-catching.Small text had a Blue ‘Inner Glow’ to make it stand out against the background – variety.

From the final design of the Library, I then moved on to designing 2 Signs for the entrance of the Library, for the final design. This sign had to incorporate the colours, patterns and styles of the interior of the Library to attract students within. The sign also had to contain at least 1 photo of the inside and the name of the Library to meet the specification. Both of these signs meet the specification as they include all of these aspects. I started by producing the basic outlines for the designs on 2-D design, because it is accurate and precise. These outlines were then pasted into Photoshop, to add the graphics.

On the left, you can see the steps I made to producing the first design of the sign for the outside of the Library. I used Photoshop because I could use a range of techniques quickly and accurately, producing an aesthetically pleasing sign. The finished design is eye-catching. I kept the design simple so students walking past the Library would be able to read and look at the sign quickly. The sign is also attractive, therefore attracting students within the Library (function.) I have used the same colours and patterns as within the inside of the Library so the two link, and so students can see what is included within the Library. The Title stands out well also. All this meets the specification.

Within the model of the Library, this sign would be produced from a base of Foam Board, because this is the correct thickness for the sign, it is lightweight and aesthetically pleasing (if cut using a Stanley knife, not the laser cutter as this burns the edges). Due to the geometric shape, it wouldn’t take long or be difficult to cut out the square shape of the sign. The graphics would be printed onto either Folding Boxboard because this has an excellent printing surface and is relatively inexpensive. This in turn would be stuck/attached to the foam board base, which would support the folding boxboard card. However, this is difficult to print on within school, therefore the design may have to be printed onto normal paper instead (which isn’t as pleasing.)

I chose the middle sized font (above) because this was easily seen from a long distance and is eye

catching. The smaller font couldn’t be seen easily and the large font was too distracting and didn’t

produce a pleasing composition.

Bevel and Embossed border for more impact.

Background boarder for complimenting design. Opacity 15% used, and effect of ‘Sprayed Strokes’ for variety and interest.

‘Haydon Library’ text had effects Bevel Emboss, Outer Glow (red) and Shadow for impact – more eye-catching.

Screen shots taken from Google Sketch-up Design of Library. This will also be used for model as the images are complimenting to the design. These images are of Opacity 75% so as not to be too bold, and the edges have been faded out – smooth.

Small text – Shadow (red) for more impact and variety.

Again I used Photoshop to create the second sign design on the right. The finished design is simple yet attractive., attracting students within the Library itself. The text ‘Haydon Library’ stands out which is its function. The colours and designs used are the same as those used within the model which links the interior with the exterior, and allows the students to know what the Library is and contains. The images of the inside of the Library let the students see what the inside of the Library looks like, hopefully attracting them to use the Library. This all meets the specification.

The whole sign links together due to the curved and waved shapes and forms used throughout. This gives a pleasing composition. The left side of this sign is quite plain due to the light and half transparent images and patterns, however if these were made opaque, the sign appeared complicated, and the eye didn’t know where to look. This isn’t attractive, therefore I kept the design simple.

Within the final model of the Library, this sign would be produced from an Acrylic base because this material is strong and durable. The shape would be cut using the Laser cutter as this is quick and accurate, and produced a smooth edge. The design of the sign would be produced using Adhesive backed Vinyl. The colours of Vinyl are bold, bright and attractive. They are also eye-catching. Vinyl is strong and durable and is also flexible. The design would be cut using the Vinyl cutter because this is also quick and accurate. The images of the inside of the Library would be achieved by printing the images onto Card and attaching them onto the Acrylic base. However, the variety of colours, tones and shading on the sign would be very hard to create using Vinyl. Therefore, the whole design might need to be printed

onto card and attached to the Acrylic base. This would also be durable and aesthetically pleasing.

‘Inner Shadow’ and ‘Bevel and Embossed’ border for more impact.

Images are Opacity 45% behind the waved background of Opacity 17%. This allows both patterns to be seen. The edges of the images were faded out for a smooth and pleasing finish.

Waved background effects – ‘Dry Brush’

and ‘Splatter’ for variety and interest.

I started by using Foam Board first because this is a suitable modelling material due to its thin thickness and because it can be easily shaped. This material was also more readily available in school. I cut the base of the model with the Laser Cutter because this is accurate and quick. Where the groove would be (to slot the walls into,) I engraved the outline (rim) to show where this groove would be positioned. I didn’t, however leave a rim between the edge of the Foam Board and the groove, and therefore when I came to actually creating this groove (using a Stanley knife and metal rule,) it didn’t look very pleasing. In addition, the heat of the Laser Cutter had melted the soft foam between the plastic, and so it had shrunk away from the edges. This made it very difficult for the components to fit and glue together due to very little surface area for gluing. It also wasn’t aesthetically pleasing.

So, I then decided to cut out the shapes of the walls, using a Stanley knife and metal rule. The edges were far more pleasing, and finished, however this method wasn’t very accurate at all. It was very difficult to cut the thickness of the 5mm Foam Board straight and therefore wasn’t produced at a high quality (specification.)Foam board isn’t very durable either, even though it is of an excellent strength to weight ratio.

I then started to build a prototype of the architectural

model. I created it half the size of what the size of the final

model will be. This allowed me to test out materials, dimensions,

and how each of the components would fit together.

Due to the disadvantages of the foam board, I decided to prototype the model using 3mm MDF, which was my original plan (fro design – see slides above). I found that MDF is a lot more durable than foam board, and it also has excellent strength. It is however, a lot heavier.

I used butt joints again as this is suitable for modelling. However the end ‘grain’ can be seen, therefore not making it as aesthetically pleasing. Therefore I might try mitre joints to join the sides together. This will be difficult to make accurately and may take quite a bit of time however. Within the real model, I will make grooves within the base of the MDF model, so the side walls can slot in. This provides more gluing area and will allow the walls to be positioned correctly.

The brown/burnt edges of the MDF is due to the laser cutter. This is a disadvantage, however this can be easily covered (including the surface of the MDF) with either paint and or paper/card (to print the wall designs on.) This would be more aesthetically pleasing and the paper, card or paint would also protect the MDF underneath, making it last longer. The surface of the MDF isn’t as durable as thicker MDF due to the resin. This therefore isn’t as aesthetically pleasing. However when covered, this solves the problem and makes the model more aesthetically pleasing and of as higher quality.

The walls do appear to be too low in height, however these are the correct proportions of the Library (measured and scaled down.) The Library area is quite large, with the walls being approx 2400mm in height in reality. I could create the walls to be slightly taller (by about 5mm) as this would look slightly more realistic. The other dimensions, are however in proportion correctly. Also... Currently, the walls are 40mm in height. However, when the walls of the model are fitted inside the groove/slot, the height of the walls from the floor of the base to the top of the walls will be smaller. Therefore, an extra 3-5mm should be added to the wall heights in order for it to stay in portion.

Engraved Door Area to show user how door would open. Doors – gaps in wall material.

Initially, there were going to be clear acrylic walls, beside the Library door entrance. However, the angle

the edges would need to be at to glue together (walls) is awkward and would be very difficult to produce. They

are non-45 degrees. Therefore, I will change the entrance to be curved. This would be produced using clear acrylic, and using the line bender to produce a

curved entrance. The Line bender will need an accurate jib to create the correct shape, however once finished

the entrance will be more pleasing.

2mm rim between the edge of the MDF base and the walls/grooves.

Butt Joints

Area between the 2 red lines – area of groove

within base.

The side part of the Library

shape has been removed. In

reality this would become

a store cupboard. This

makes the shape of the

Library and therefore

model less complicated,

and this extra space is not

wasted.

Cross Halving joint used as a joint for the removable wall on the left of the

model.Within the final model, the same wall

would also be joined to the Acrylic wall with a cross halving joint. This keeps the wall secure but removable at the

same time.

This wall of the model is also removable to give the user another view of the model. A cross halving joint would get in the way of

the other components within the model and therefore a ‘Groove’ has been used (for the

edges/sides of the wall) instead (created with 2 layers of MDF). This allows the wall to slide

out of the base groove too. Removable

Wall

Removable Wall

Needs an extra 3mm.

Next…Instead of using the CNC router to cut grooves within the base of the model, I

created this ‘groove’ by having 2 layers of 3mm MDF. This was quicker and was as accurate. The top layer was smaller in

dimensions to the bottom layer. This left a 2mm rim around the 3mm width MDF walls.

This is aesthetically pleasing and acts as a guideline for the walls. It keeps the walls

positioned correctly.

This acrylic ‘window’ within the MDF is not securely joined to the MDF due to the limited gluing area. To

increase this gluing area, within the final model, I will create a second layer for this wall (attached to the

inside of the wall), however the MDF would go about 1-2mm over the Acrylic window.

This would mean, the ‘groove’ would need to be increased for the 2nd layer of the 3mm MDF.

3mm clear and transparent Acrylic used to represent the ‘windows’ and glass walls. These glass walls for the

staff office and computer room make the Library seem more spacious. The glass walls give a relaxed, calm and

modern feel to the place.

Walls added and glued using Wood Glue

The next step in my prototype model was to create the inside components. However, instead of creating these out of the materials I would used within the final model, I

created the components out of thin, ordinary card. This allowed me to check whether the proportions were correct. In addition, the card components allowed me to view the layout of the inside of the Library, and this allowed me to change anything if it wasn’t

complimenting. The card was quick to cut out, and even though it wasn’t as accurate, it didn’t need to be, as it was only a rough idea of how my final model would turn out.

Library Entrance view Right section of Library Eye View

Removable wall 1 viewRemovable wall 2 view

All of the components I found to be the correct

proportion to each other. I created this prototype model at a scale of 1:60 as this is half the size of

the final model. Each components I created at

this scale also.

This concertina paper represents the sliding door that would be included within the real life Library. This didn’t look very pleasing in the model, mainly due to the material used. However within the final model it could just be represented by having a small section of this door (produced from PP because its thin and lightweight but also strong) to the side, just to give the idea that it is there.

Bookshelves

In my design, the right section of the Library would be on a higher ground/platform than the left section. I would create this by vacuum forming the steps and floor. Therefore, the components on this section would be higher up than shown here. This would mean the wall height (around the whole model) would need to be increased by the same amount as the height of the platform. This would make the model proportionate.

Backs of the bookshelves would need to be covered for an aesthetically pleasing look when the removable wall is removed.

Due to changing the shape of the exit of the Library, the door was also re-positioned. Therefore this leaflet holder sticks out over the door. Either the leaflet holder has to be removed (no other place for it) or the door has to be moved over to the right (which isn’t as practical as there isn’t as much room to move.)

Not much room for movement. Curved bookshelf and tables have to be moved over to the left by approx 5mm.

Curved bookshelves would be made from this same card in final model as it is quick, and the material is flexible for curved edges – aesthetically pleasing. It would be covered with wood design (showing books and shelves) within final also. Same idea for teachers desk

The individual shelf heights are out of proportion as they are too high for even large books. Within the final, I would make this with 4 or 5 shelves instead of this 3.

UNIT C4This is a plan view, with measurements/dimensions, of the final design for the Interior of the Library. For the changes and improvements made from the original, see section C3. This design is attractive and was chosen by the students themselves. I improved the design and they thought this final design was attractive, creative and unique. They said that the new look would make them use the Library more often. The curved bookshelves were thought to be really interesting and appealing. The design is spacious and relaxed, allowing room for movement. The Library contains enough storage space for books, enough space for at least 50 students to study at any one time. The right section of the Library allows for a lesson of 30 students to take place, due to the large tables shown. The right section of the design is on a platform. This adds variety and interest. On the next few slides, the individual components of the whole model of the Library are explained in detail, to show what the model of the Library will look like clearly.

Extra platform for relaxation. In reality, bean bags would be included here.

KEY

10mm = 1m in realityBlack – Wall structures and

componentsPink – Windows/Glass walls

Blue – Dimensions

Model will be of a scale of 1:30

On this page is the base for the Architectural model of the Library. The base of the model is made up of 2 bases. The top layer of the base attaches to the bottom layer of the base as shown at the top right of this page. The top layer is smaller than the bottom, and in most places leaves a 8mm border of the bottom base. This allows room for the 6mm thickness of MDF walls and an additional 2mm as a border. This is aesthetically pleasing. The MDF walls glue to the bottom base, but sit against the top layer. This is similar to a ‘groove’ but is easier to produce using 2 layers of base instead. This is aesthetically pleasing and acts as a guideline for the walls. It keeps the walls positioned correctly. 6mm MDF would be used as this is best in proportion to the width of the walls in reality. A scale of 1:30 has been used on the model, because this isn’t too small to create detail and isn’t too large so is easier to transport. MDF is easily shaped, has its own surface finish, and is aesthetically pleasing. It also comes in many sizes. The laser cutter would be used to cut the shapes of the MDF base (and walls – next slide) because it is accurate and quick.

The floor pattern shown on the left of this slide glues onto the top layer of base. This floor pattern best compliments the wall patterns, designs and colours. The pale and neutral tones are relaxed and make the room spacious and attractive. The patterned floor would be produced by having the pattern printed onto normal white paper, as this is easily available in school. Solid White Board would be ideal to print the pattern on because it has an excellent printing surface and is strong and durable. However, this is very difficult to print on within school, and therefore normal paper will have to be used instead. This will glue/attach onto the MDF base and also the PP platform (right section of Library – see few slides ahead). This is aesthetically pleasing, accurate and will protect the MDF and PP floor to some extent.

On this slide you can see the MDF walls for the model. I have positioned them around the MDF base so it is clear which wall goes where. The ends of the arrows point and show which side of the individual walls attach to which side of the base. The measurements are shown. Some of the walls have slots. This is so various walls can attach and slot into each other. This makes the model more stable and therefore more durable. 6mm MDF would be used for the majority of the walls in the model as this is best in proportion to the width of the walls in reality. A scale of 1:30 has been used on the model, because this isn’t too small to create detail and isn’t too large so is easier to transport. MDF is easily shaped, has its own surface finish, and is aesthetically pleasing. It also comes in many sizes. The laser cutter would be used to cut the shapes of the MDF base (and walls – next slide) because it is accurate and quick.

Every wall of this model is of height 91mm. This allows for the extra 6mm needed to lot onto the

base depth/groove, and also accounts for the extra 5mm height of the lifted platform (right section of

the model.)

The 2 waved patterns shown here glue onto the walls shown. When I received feedback, this was the pattern and colour scheme that was most preferred by the students aged 11-18. The pattern and design is modern, attractive and relaxed. I have only chosen 2 walls to put this pattern on, otherwise the pattern would be too overwhelming. All the other walls shown here are a pale yellow/cream colour (shown on the waved pattern itself) as this makes the room appear spacious, relaxed and calm. It also compliments the patterned walls. These colours and patterned walls (including the yellow/cream walls) would be produced

by having the pattern/colour printed onto normal white paper, as this is easily available in school. Solid White Board would be ideal to print the pattern on because it has an excellent printing surface and is strong and durable. However, this is very difficult to print on within school, and therefore normal paper will have to be used instead. This will glue/attach onto the MDF walls. This is aesthetically pleasing, accurate and will protect the MDF walls to some extent. The exterior of the walls will be painted white (or cream) to ‘hide’ the burnt edges produced from using the laser cutter. The paint will be aesthetically pleasing and will protect the MDF wood underneath also.

Cream yellow wall colour for all other interior walls.

On this slide you can see the Acrylic walls for the model. I have positioned them around the MDF base so it is clear which wall goes where. The ends of the arrows point and show which side of the individual walls attach to which side of the base. The measurements are shown.The walls shown on this slide will be produced from clear, Transparent Acrylic, of width 3mm. This best represents the glass and windows in reality. Clear and Transparent Acrylic also allows the viewer to view the model at another angle! Acrylic is strong and durable and easily cut into shape, with the laser cutter because this is quick and accurate. Acrylic however can be brittle, but at the small scale of this model its not as likely to break. The window panes/separations would be shown on the acrylic surface by engraving it on using the laser cutter. This is unique and adds detail.The internal doors (to computer room and staff office) would be shown just by having a gap where the door would be. This is simple and clear to the user. These internal walls would also slot into grooves within the base of the model. This keeps the walls secure and in position. Wood glue would be used to permanently attach the MDF walls to the base and Contact Adhesive would be used to attach the Acrylic to the MDF base as this joins dissimilar materials. Tensol cement would be used to join the few Acrylic walls together (the staff office walls) because this bonds instantly and is very strong and durable. It will add extra strength to the model.

This curved entrance would also be produced from clear, transparent Acrylic because it would show the view of the Library from the entrance, which would be seen in reality. The correct size of Acrylic would be cut out and, using the Line Bender, would be moulded into the curved shape of the entrance of the Library. A jig would have to be produced to create the accurate curved shape and angles. This jog would be produced from MDF because this s easily shapes and is strong. The doors of the entrance would be engraved onto the surface of the Acrylic within the model because this s interesting and aesthetically pleasing.

The model will also have a clear and transparent lid. This will protect the inside components and the model will be more durable. In addition, the lid will make the model more aesthetically pleasing. The lid will be made from a thin sheet (approx 1-2mm) of clear and transparent ..........? The transparent colour will allow the user to view the inside layout, making the inside of the Library model clearly seen. The lid will also be able to be removed from the model so the user can get to look at the inside of the model in more detail. The lid will be exactly the same dimensions as the bottom base of the model (see 2 slides before), making it compliment the model. The extra 2mm rim (from the walls to the edge of the lid) around the outside of the plastic lid will be filled by adding strips of Rigid Polystyrene (attached to the underside of the lid.) This will act as a guideline, so the lid will slot onto the model easily, and will be less likely to fall off the model. The Polystyrene strips will be approx 1mm thick and therefore won’t distract from the model appearance. It will blend in with the exterior wall colour also.

The jig to create the curved Acrylic entrance to the Library model.

Acrylic would sit in this groove, with its surface

against this back MDF jig wall. This makes sure the

acrylic wall is vertically straight.

This page shows all the different variety of components that are included within the Library model. I have included details of how these would be made and produced. I have used Google Sketch up to create an exploded drawing of the individual components to show clearly how they would be made. The next slide also shows the final design of the Library in 3-D, with dimensions and extra materials and processes, to show how the model will be made clearly.

This is how the Circular bookshelf would be produced. The Blue shelves will be produced from Acrylic because this is durable and aesthetically pleasing, showing the bright colour well. The shape would be cut using the scroll saw by hand due to its small size. The edges will be sanded smooth to prevent injury. The ‘Pole’ within the middle will be a wooden Dowel cut to the correct height. The hole within the acrylic shelves will be produced using the drill because this is accurate and quick. The shelves will then easily slot onto the dowel, and will be stuck used contact adhesive, which joins dissimilar materials.

This table represents how all the tables (round and square) will be produced within the model. The process is the same – apart from the vinyl top layer which not all tables have. The table tops will be made from 3mm MDF because this is the correct thickness needed to be in proportion with the rest of the model. The shape will be cut using the scroll saw or hand held saw because this gives a different process and the small size will be fairly simple to cut out. It also doesn’t leave burnt edges like the laser cutter. The legs of the tables will again use wooden dowels because they are readily available and best represent the table legs in reality well. They are stable also. The legs will be attached to the table top using PVA wood glue as this is permanent and strong. The coloured squares on top of the table will be made from adhesive back Vinyl as this is very strong and durable and will produce the bold colours. The shapes will be cut using a Stanley knife because this is accurate and fairly quick.

Above shows the leaflet holders within the Library design. This exploded drawing above represents the leaflet holders and also the large bookshelf in the top right corner of the Library design. The shelves would again be produced

from Acrylic because this is durable and strong. The shapes would be cut using the laser cutter as this will produce the shelves to the same shape and size, without error. The wooden pole shown allows the shelves to attach to it, giving more gluing area and strength. The sides/edges of the shelves will also be glued to the walls of the model. The pole will be made form cutting a wooden dowel into quarters. This allows the curved surface shown. However, this will be very difficult to produce accurately and safely, therefore a square piece of MDF (cut to size) may be used instead which is safer at this small scale and easier to produce.

All the rectangular bookshelves of the design will be made by the process shown here. Each bookshelf will have its walls and shelves produced separately, and then glued together at the end. Wood glue/PVA will be used as this is strong. However, it does dry slowly, and therefore the bookshelves will need masking tape to hold the parts together while the glue dries. A clamp would be more effective, however many would be needed to hold the many parts. This would get complicated. 3mm MDF would be sued as this is the correct thickness in proportion to the rest of the model. The parts will be cut using the scrollsaw or hand held saw, as even though this is a slow process it prevents the edges from being burnt within the laser cutter.

These curved bookshelves will be produced differently to add variety to the model. Within the prototype, the curved bookshelves worked well being made from flexible card, producing the curved sides well. This was a fairly quick process and is pleasing. The card would be strong and very durable. The blue shelf design (see final 3-D design) will be shown by taking an image of the shelves from the Google sketch up design (see right for example) and glued onto the surface of the card bookshelf. This will be interesting and unique. The blue colour will then still be seen, and the bookshelf will look more pleasing.

To the left are the raised floors/platforms for the right section of the Library. Both raised platforms will be made from Rigid Polystyrene because this is available in school, meeting the specification, and the material is lightweight and rigid. It is an ideal material for use with the Vacuum Former. This is how the platform will be produced. Vacuumforming is accurate and inexpensive. The moulds will be produced from MDF because this can be sanded down and shaped fairly easily and accurately. The patterned wooden floor shown will be achieved by printing this graphic onto paper/card, and gluing it onto the surface of the Polystyrene (maybe double sided sticky tape as this is strong and instant. Glue may cause the paper to slide across the shiny surface of the Polystyrene.)

Even though I haven't re-designed the layout and designs for the Computer or Teachers parts of the Library, the design didn’t look complete with the plain walls and floors. The model wouldn’t look aesthetically pleasing. Therefore, I added the same flooring and cream walls to these 2 rooms as the rest of the Library, however of a lighter tone so as not to be too distracting for the main Library space. This gives a pleasing composition to the overall appearance of the Library.

The teachers desk will be made from Styrofoam because this is lightweight, a great modelling material and easy to shape. It also gives a variety of materials to the model, making it more interesting and aesthetically pleasing. The dark wood colour will be achieved by painting the

Styrofoam this colour (the same colour as the curved floor decoration/platform. This will also protect the Styrofoam surface.

This curved floor decoration/platform will be made from 3mm MDF because this is the correct thickness for the platform to be in proportion to the model. 3mm MDF is also easily shaped and cut, using the scroll saw, into this curved form. The platform will then be painted to the dark wood colour shown here, to match the teachers desk. This will protect the wood underneath and will compliment the rest of the design.

91mm

Groove height 6mm

55mm

55mm

62mm

46mm

23mm

30mm

15mm6mm

24mm

3mm

Final Design – Different

Views

This is the sign that I have chosen to use for the outside of the Library, because when I received feedback, the students thought that this was most attractive and eye-catching due to its bold title. The colours were thought to be bold and interesting. They also thought that the outside shape of the sign was unique and linked very well to the interior pattern and shapes of the Library. The design was thought to be pleasing to look at. This sign would be produced from a base of 5mm Foam Board, because this is the correct thickness for the sign, it is lightweight and aesthetically pleasing (if cut using a Stanley knife, not the laser cutter as this burns the edges). Due to the curved shape, a template may have to be produced to cut around, as it is quite difficult to cut foam board accurately and to the correct shape. A template would make it easier to produce the curved edge shape. The graphics would be printed onto normal paper as this is available to print on easily within school. This in turn would be attached/glued to Solid White board/Card because this s durable and strong and would protect both the paper and the foam board surface underneath. This card adds strength to the paper and foam board and makes the sign more durable. It would support the Foam Board.

100mm

44mm

Each lesson and Homework slot is 1hr 40mins. (Homework is approx 5 hrs per week in total)

Week 1 Start 7th March

Week 2 Start 14th March

Week 3 Start 21th March

Week 4 Start 28th March

Week 5 Start 4th April

Week 6 Start 11th April

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Homework 1

Homework 2

Homework 3

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Homework 1

Homework 2

Homework 3

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Homework 1

Homework 2

Homework 3

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Homework 1

Homework 2

Homework 3

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Homework 1

Homework 2

Homework 3

Lesson 1

Lesson 2

Lesson 3

Homework 1

Homework 2

Homework 3

Model Base

Produce the layout and outlines, for the 4 separate parts of the base, on 2-D Design (x4 A2 Sheets)

Cut out the 4 parts of the model base, using the Laser Cutter. X4 A2 Sheets of 6mm MDF.

Glue the base together in 2 parts. Base - 2 halves, each of 2 layers. Use PVA wood glue. Clamp and leave to dry for 24hrs.

Model Walls/struc

ture

Produce the layout and outlines, for the walls of the model, on 2-D Design. (X2 A2 sheet and x1 A3 Sheet)

Cut out the walls for the model, using the Laser Cutter. X2 A2 Sheets of 3mm white Acrylic, and x1 A3 sheet of 3mm clear and transparent Acrylic.

Clean surfaces of each wall.

Each (white) wall piece is made up of 2 layers of 3mm white Acrylic. For each separate wall piece glue these 2 layers together using Tensol Cement. Clean the surfaces and edges again.

Sand the edges of each wall even, level and smooth.

Vacuum formed

Platform and Stairs

Produce a sketch design for final outcome of Vacuum Formed Platform and Stairs.

Produce moulds using 6mm MDF. The main floor platform is produced separately to the smaller stairs.

Glue the different parts of the smaller stairs/platform together in correct layout, using PVA. Clamp and leave for 24 hours to dry and set.

Sand and shape moulds so sides of MDF are slanted, the edges and corners rounded.

Produce the 2 Vacuum Formed platforms, using the MDF moulds and the Vacuum forming Machine. Use white Polystyrene.

Cut out the Vacuum Formed platforms and sand to smooth the edges down.

Graphics and Design

Produce the designs and graphics for the walls and floors of the model on Photoshop. Use the 2-D Design layout of the base/walls as a guideline for the size and shapes of the graphics space.

Print wall and floor graphics, using the A3 Printer.

Cut out graphics to shape and size.

Glue the graphics to the walls and base of the model

Glue the structure

of the model

together

If any adjustments need to the made to the size and fit of the structure, make the changes before gluing.

Glue the walls to the base of the structure, and at the same time each wall to the adjacent wall.

Clamp and leave to dry (in a safe and secure place)

Bookshelves and round tables

Produce the layout and outlines, for the separate parts of the square bookshelves, circle bookshelf and round tables, on 2-D Design. (x1 A2 Sheet, x1 200mmx200mm sheet)

Cut out these parts using the laser cutter. X1 A2 sheet of 3mm MDF and x1 200mmx200mm of 3mm blue Acrylic.

Take 3mm radius wood Dowel and cut x1: 55mm and x10: 24mm lengths of this dowel, for middle leg of tables and middle pole of circle bookshelf.

Glue the bookshelves and tables together. Clamp/hold and leave to dry.

Square tables, floor

decorations, corner

leaflet holders/bookshelves

Draw guidelines /outlines for the shapes of each listed component onto the surfaces of each material.

Cut out all the parts to each component, using the scroll saw.

If any adjustments need to be made to the size or shape of the parts, make these changes. I.e. Sand down to change/fit correct shape.

Sand down and smooth the edges of these parts.

Take 3mm radius wood Dowel and cut x3: 59mm and x33: 20mm and x4: 16mm lengths of this dowel, for legs of tables and poles of curved acrylic leaflet holders/bookshelves.

Glue the bookshelves and tables together. Clamp/hold and leave to dry.

Teachers Desk, Floor Decoration

s

Draw birds eye view of the shape/outline of the teachers desk onto the top surface of a block of Styrofoam, height 27mm.

Sand down the sides of the Styrofoam block into the shape of the teachers desk.

Paint the surface of this block, and also the 2 floor decorations, a dark brown colour. This colour must compliment and match the whole model design.

Paint the surfaces of these components with clear varnish, after applying the brown paint.

Gluing Components to Model

If any adjustments need to the made to the size and fit of the structure or components, make the changes before gluing.

Glue the components to the model, in the correct positions.

Clamp/hold and leave to dry (in a safe and secure place)

2D Sign

Produce the layout and outlines, for the design for the sign, on 2-D Design

Paste the outlines for the sign into Photoshop and create the colours, designs and patterns onto the signPrint the sign using an A4 Printer and cut out

Draw the outline of the sign onto the surface of Foam board

Cut out the sign shape from the Foam board

If any adjustments need to be made to the size and shape of the Foam board or sign, make the changes Glue the sign to the Foam board and Glue sign to model

UNIT DThis Gantt Chart

shows how I plan to carry out making my Model of the Library. The Gantt chart also takes into account how long I plan to spend carrying out each task. The red boxes show this.

The production schedule on the next few slides explains what each task includes, in detail. The tables explain the materials and sizes needed for each task, the time I estimated each task would take me, the actual time each task took me to complete, the safety hazards and the quality controls needed to make each task successful. This was to help me so that when it came to actually making my model of the Library, I knew exactly what I was going to do when and what materials I needed also.

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time (Minutes)

Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is completed to high standard).

Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you will ensure the task is carried out safely)

Actual time (Minutes)

1 Produce the layout and outlines, for the 4 separate parts of the base, on 2-D Design. x4 A2 Sheets on 2-D design Computer, 2-D Design 60

Use 2-D Design to produce the correct measurments and sizes needed for the base layout and size. Use the attach tool to ensure all lines connect together to produce an

accurate shape. Make sure the Step Lock is on at 1mm to ensure accuracy and preciseness.

Minimal Risk. Take regular breaks while working on the computer to prevent eye strain, back damage and wrist problems. Chair must be stable and comfortable.

120

2 Cut out the 4 parts of the model base, using the Laser Cutter. X4 A2 Sheets of 6mm MDF Computer, Laser Cutter 40

Place each sheet of MDF in turn into the Laser Cutter, at point 0,0. Lay down gently so as not to damage the laser cutter 'honeycomb' floor. Use Auto focas to line up the laser with the MDF and set laser to 0,0 also so the base

is cut within the MDF area. Make sure the Extractor button is turned ON so dust and fumes (when cutting)

are taken out of machine. Use cutting Speed of 0.7, Power of 100 and PPI 1524.

Make sure Extractor is turned on so as not to inhale the fumes when the lid is opened and to reduce fire

risk. Make sure the Lid is completely closed and sealed before using the laser cutter so injuries are prevented.

110

3 Glue the base together in 2 parts. Base - 2 halves, each of 2 layers. Use PVA wood glue. Clamp and leave to dry for 24hrs.

x4 Base: x2 409mmx486mm and x2 400mmx470mm

PVA Wood Glue, Masking Tape, Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Tri-square, G-Clamps,

Clamps, Damp Cloth 60

Mark out, with a sharp pencil, where to position and glue the top part of the base onto the second part. Use a Tri-square for accuracy. This insures all parts of the base

line up correctly and leave the correct space for the walls of the model. Spread the glue evenly across the MDF

surface and clamp securely. Wipe any excess glue with a damp cloth. Leave for 24hrs minimum for a strong bond.

Minimal Risk. Use glue in a ventilated area to avoid breathing the fumes. 75

Model Base

Model Walls/Structure

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time (Minutes)

Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is completed to high standard).

Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you will ensure the task is carried out safely)

Actual time (Minutes)

1 Produce the layout and outlines, for the walls of the model, on 2-D Design.

X2 A2 sheet and x1 A3 Sheet on 2-D design Computer, 2-D Design 90

Use 2-D Design to produce the correct measurments and sizes needed for the wall sizes. Use the attach tool to

ensure all lines connect together to produce an accurate shape. Make sure the Step Lock is on at 1mm to ensure

accuracy and preciseness.

Minimal Risk. Take regular breaks while working on the computer to prevent eye strain, back damage and wrist problems. Chair must be stable and comfortable.

100

2 Cut out the walls for the model, using the Laser Cutter. X2 A2 Sheets of 3mm white Acrylic, and x1 A3 sheet of 3mm clear and

transparent Acrylic.Computer, Laser Cutter 80

Place each sheet of Acrylic in turn into the Laser Cutter, at point 0,0. Lay down gently so as not to damage the

laser cutter 'honeycomb' floor. Use Auto focas to line up the laser with the Acrylic and set laser to 0,0 also so the

base is cut within the Acrylic area. Make sure the Extractor button is turned ON so dust and fumes (when cutting) are taken out of machine. Use cutting Speed of

1.3 , Power of 100 and PPI 1522.

Make sure Extractor is turned on so as not to inhale the fumes when the lid is opened and to reduce fire

risk. Make sure the Lid is completely closed and sealed before using the laser cutter so injuries are prevented.

120

3 Clean surfaces of each wall.Walls dimensions are each different. X2 of each white Acrylic wall and x1

of each clear Acrylic wall. (See above) White Spirit, Old Cloth, Newspaper 60

Use a small amount of white spirit on the cloth to clean off the dirt off of the Acrylic surface. Make sure the cloth is smooth so as not to scratch the surface of the Acrylic. Wipe the excess white spirit off the Acrylic with another

cloth so as not to damage the Acrylic appearance.

Use white spirit in a well ventilated area so as not to breath the fumes. Wear plastic/protective gloves to

ensure no white psirit iritates th skin. Use newspaper on the work surface to protect the work surface.

35

4Each (white) wall piece is made up of 2 layers of 3mm white

Acrylic. For each seperate wall piece glue these 2 layers together using Tensol Cement. Clean the surfaces and edges

again. As above Tensol Cement, Paint Brush, Masking Tape,

Tri-square, Newspaper, Plastic Gloves 150

Use a tri-square to line up the 2 pieces of acrylic being glued together - accuracy. Hold this position with

masking tape to ensure the pieces of acrylic don't slip or slide over each other. This makes gluing easier. Use only

a small amount of Tensol cement on the brush and dab it slowly and accurately between the acrylic pieces, around every edge. Don't get any on the surface of the Acrylic as

this will damage the surface.

Use Tensol cement in a well ventilated area so as not to breath in the fumes. Wear plastic/protective gloves

to ensure no Tensol cement burns the skin. Use newspaper on the work surface to protect the work

surface.

120

5 Sand the edges of each wall even, level and smooth. As above Wet and Dry sand paper, Sanding Block, Water, Cloth, Tri-square 180

Use a sanding block to ensure you are sanding striaght and even. Use rough (180 strength) wet and dry paper

first, then smooth (600 strength) wet and dry paper next, and then use water with the smooth wet and dry

paper. This ensures the edges of the acrylic walls are very smooth and aesthetically pleasing. Use a tri-square

every so often while sanding to make sure sanding is straight - 90 degrees to the next edge.

Minimal risk. Wear protective apron to protect clothes. Take regular breaks to prevent wrist and back

strain. 200

Vacuum Formed Platform and Stairs

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time

(Minutes)

1 Produce a sketch design for final outcome of Vacuum Formed Platform and Stairs.

Platform should be approx 350mmx330mm and hieght 6mm Pencil, Ruler, Paper. 10

Produce a rough sketch. Use the ruler to create straight lines and write down the approx measurments needed on the rough

sketch.Minimal Risk. 5

2 Produce moulds using 6mm MDF. The main floor platform is produced separately to the smaller stairs.

Large platform is 350mmx332mm, of 6mm MDF. Smaller platform made of 6mm MDF of size: 90mmx67mm, 90mmx60mm and

90mmx53mm.

Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Tri-Square, Scroll Saw, Goggles, Apron 150

Use a Sharp Pencil so the lines drawn are accurate, clear and precise. Use a tri-square to ensure that each side of the MDF

mould is at right angles to the side next to it. Measure the mould so it is 1mm less in size around the whole platform to the size of

the space it is being put in. This allows room for the 1mm Polystyrene material. Guide the piece of MDF through the Scroll

Saw, but slowly so as not to make a mistake as easily and so as not to break the blade. Saw and cut outside the drawn lines. This

leaves room for adjustments.

Wear protective Goggles to prevent dust or dirt reaching the eyes (which can cause irritation.) Wear an apron to protect your clothes. Keep fingers away from the Scroll saw to prevent injury. Tie long hair back to

prevent it being caught in the machine.

120

3 Make sure all edges of each shape/component are straight. If not File or sand down. As Above.

Tri-square, Cross-File, Medium Smooth Sand/Glass paper, Sanding block, Sharp Pencil,

Steel Rule, Wood Vice.20

Use the tri-square to not only check whether each side is straight but to check whether each side is at right angles to the next. If

not, use a sharp pencil and a steel rule to draw corrections. File or sand down to the straight line drawn. Keep the file flat on the

surface but file at an angle to the edge of the MDF component. With the Glass paper use a Sanding block to make sure the

sanding is consistent and flat/straight. Clamp the components in a Wood Vice so the MDF doesn't move while sanding - accuracy.

Minimal risk. Wear an apron to prevent dust reaching clothes. Clamp the MDF components tightly and

securly so as not to slip while using the file and this prevents injuries.

15

4Glue the different parts of the smaller stairs/platform

together in correct layout, using PVA. Clamp and leave for 24 hours to dry and set.

As aboveSharp Pencil, Ruler, Tri-square, Sharp pointed

item - E.G a small rounded file, Glass Paper, PVA glue, Damp Cloth, Wood Vice, G-clamps

30 + 24hrs drying time.

Mark out where each piece of MDF is being glued to the next with a sharp pencil, and trisquare for accuracy. Scrape into every area

being glued using a sharp item, E.G a file. Use Glass paper to even the surface. This will allow more cavities for the PVA glue to

grip onto - makes gluing more effective. Spread PVA evenly around surface of MDF pieces. Use a dmap cloth to remove any

excess glue. Clamp the components together using G-Clamps and the Wood Vice. Leave to set for 24hrs minimum.

Minimal risk. Wear an apron to prevent dust or glue reaching clothes. Use in a ventilated area so as not to inhale PVA glue fumes. Use newspaper to protect the

work surface so prevent damage.

20 + 24hrs drying time.

5Sand and shape moulds so sides of MDF are slanted to an

angle lower than 90 degrees, and sand the edges and corners so they are rounded.

Large platform is 350mmx332mm, of 6mm MDF. Smaller platform: 90mmx67mm,

hieght 18mm.

Striaght Line (disk) sander, Goggles, Apron, Tri-square, Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Wood Vice,

Cross-File, Medium Smooth Glass Paper, Sanding Block.

120

On the underneath of each component draw a rim 1mm from each edge. This will be the guide to where you stop when

sanding. Only a small slant due to the small height. Guide the MDF component while Sanding and hold firmly so as not to make a mistake. Check, using the Tri-square, that each side is still at a

right angle to the next. If not adjust this by sanding straight. Use a Sharp Pencil and Steel rule to draw a rim of 1mm from each edge of each component. This will be a guide of where the corners and edges can be rounded up to maximum. This doesn't necessarily mean that you round the corners up to these lines. Round each

corner and edge so the sharp point has gone. Smooth with Glass paper - pleasing look.

Wear protective Goggles to prevent dust or dirt reaching the eyes (which can cause irritation.) Wear an

apron to protect your clothes. Tie up long hair to prevent it being caught in the machine. Guide the MDF

components slowly, but firmly, so as not to slip and cause injury to the fingers. Clamp the MDF components tightly and securely so as not to slip while using the file

and this prevents injuries.

75

6Produce the 2 Vacuum Formed platforms, using the MDF

moulds and the Vacuum forming Machine. Use white Polystyrene.

As above Vacuum forming machine. 100

Once the machine is set up, heat the polystyrene plastic for approx 30 seconds to ensure it is flexible and hot enough to bend

around the MDF mould. Pull up the MDF mould into the polystyrene plastic slowly so the plastic forms around the mould

evenly. Turn on the Vacuum and leave it on for approx 10 seconds to allow the packaging to be produced precisly. Don't let the

plastic get too cold otherwise the MDF mould won't come out of the Plastic. Slowly and carefully take away the MDf mould without

bashing it around which can break and damage the mould and internal plastic packaging.

Wear an apron to protect clothing. Don't touch heater or plastic polypropylene while hot to prevent burn

injuries.90

7 Cut out the Vacuum Formed platforms and sand to smooth the edges down. As above Steel rule, Tri-Square Stanly/Cutting Knife,

Cutting Mat, wet and dry, Sanding Block. 80

Use the Steel Rule and Stanly knife to cut around the Vacuum Formed Internal Packging to form a straight edge. Use the Tri-

square to make sure every side is cut striaght and is at right angles to the next. If not sand it down. Use the wet and dry to smooth every edge of the Internal Packaging so is not only asthetically

pleasing but safe also.

Use a cutting mat to prevent damage to the work top and to prevent the knife from slipping and causing

injury. Hold the steel rule firmly so as not to slip with the Cutting knife. Always cut away from you so if you

do slip you do not cut into yourself.

75

Graphics and Design

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1Produce the designs and graphics for the walls and

floors of the model on Photoshop. Use the 2-D Design layout of the base/walls as a guideline for the size and

shapes of the graphics space.

x7 A3 Sheets within 2-D Design. The walls are various length but all are hieght 91mm. Floor printed into 4 parts: x4

approx 400mmx235mmComputer, 2-D Design, Photoshop 100

Use 2-D Design to produce the correct measurments and sizes needed for the walls. Keep Step Lock on 1mm to ensure accuracy.

Use the line tool to create the correct shapes needed. Use Photoshop to produce the correct designs needed, with accuracy. Use the eye-drop tool to pick the correct tones of colours needed

and to keep the colours onsistent. Use colour balance to make sure all designs and graphics compliment each other. Use the MAgic

Wand tool to pick the correct space and area needed to be coloured or textured.

Minimal Risk. Take regular breaks while working on the computer to prevent eye strain, back damage and wrist

problems. Chair must be stable and comfortable. 180

2 Print wall and floor graphics, using the A3 Printer. x7 A3 Sheets of white paper. Computer, 2-D Design, A3 Printer, A3 Paper. 15 Check the printer is free of dust and dirt. Check that the ink is being printed consistently (test run first.)

Minimal risk. Don't place objects or fingers near the printer while printing. This makes sure you're safe and

the printing runs smoothly.20

3 Cut out graphics to shape and size.x7 A3 Sheets paper. The walls are various

length but all are hieght 91mm. Floor printed into 4 parts: x4 approx

400mmx235mm

Steel Rule, Cutting Mat, Stanley/cutting Knife. 85

Make sure steel rule is flat on surface to ensure accurate cutting. Place edge of steel rule just before cutting line, outside the wall area

to ensure you are not cutting within the walls and floors themselves. Use the Cutting knife slowly to avoid tearing the edges of the paper, and hold cutting knife at an angle when cutting, not

directly on point.

Hold Steel Rule firmly so as not to slip. Cut with the cutting knife away from you to avoid injury's if you slip.

Use cutting knife slowly and hold firmly to avoid slipping. Use cutting mat directly under the parts you are cutting

to avoid injuries or damaging the work surfaces.

75

4 Glue the graphics to the walls and base of the model As aboveAerosol Spray Adhesive, Damp Cloth, Extra piece of plain and clean paper to smooth

down wall and floor graphics . 180

Hold the Aerosol Spray Adhesive can at a 45 Degrees angle. This prevents any large amounts of the adhesive dripping. Spray the

Adhesive evenly and so all parts are covered allowing the gluing to be as effective as possible. Make sure your fingers are free of any dirt or Adhesive so as not to damage the graphics surface design.

Attach to Acrylic and MDF walls and base and use the spare piece of plain paper to smooth down the graphics and to prevent any

damage.

Do not inhale fumes. Use and spray the adhesive in a well ventilated area or in a fume box so the toxic fumes

aren't breathed in. Spray away from anything flammable to prevent fire. Wear protective clothing and also

protect the work surface to prevent damage.

180

Gluing the Structure of the Model Together

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1 If any adjustments need to the made to the size and fit of the structure, make the changes before gluing.

Whole model is 818mmx487mm of height 97mm

Sharp pencil, Tri-square, Steel Rule, Straight/disk sander, cross file, glass paper, wet and dry paper, stanley knife and cutting

mat, Vice.30

If any adjustments need to be made, mark them out with a Sharp Pencil, Steel rule and Tri-square to be precise and accurate. Use the disk sander to sand down the edges quickly. Make sure the sanding is straight by checking with a tri-square. While sanding clamp in a

vice for easier and more accurate sanding. If the graphics are overhanging the surface of the material slightly after adjusting, cut them down using a Stanley knife and Cutting mat. Use the Stanley knife at an angle and slowly so as not to tear the paper. Sand down

the material edges to produce a smooth and even finish.

Wear goggles while using the disk sander, and an apron to prevent both eyes and clothes. Tie long hair back. While using the stanley knife, cut away from you and hold both steel rule and knife firmly to avoid slipping

and inurying yourself.

60

2 Glue the walls to the base of the structure, and at the same time each wall to the adjacent wall. As above

UHU glue, Tensol Cement, Paint Brush, Tri-square, Sharp Pencil, Masking Tape, Clamps,

Damp Cloth160

Apply a thin layer of UHU to the edges of Acrylic and MDF. This joins dissimilar materials. Apply pressure to materials so the glue joins effectively. As each wall is added, use Tensol Cement to join each Acrylic wall to the adjacent. Use a small amount of Tensol cement

and dab is between materials to prevent it going on the Acrylic surface (damages). Use a damp cloth to remove an excess uhu glue and use the tri-square to ensure all walls are being glued 90 degrees

to each other and to the base.

Use glue in a well venitilated area so as not to inhale the fumes. Wear plastic gloves while using tensol cement to prevent burning skin. Wear apron to protect clothes. Use

newspaper on work surface to protect it. 190

3 Clamp and leave to dry (in a safe and secure place) As above Clamps, Masking Tape, extra wood piecesClamp while Gluing - 160 (as above)

Clamp areas that are easy and accessible to clamp. Use pieces of wood between the materials and the clamps to protect the material surfaces. Areas that are difficult to clamp, apply pressure for approx 2mins before using masking tape strongly to hold the walls and base

together.

Minimal risk. Watch finger so they don't get caught within clamp. 190 (as above)

Bookshelves and Round Tables

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1Produce the layout and outlines, for the separate parts of

the square bookshelves, circle bookshelf and round tables, on 2-D Design.

x1 A2 Sheet, x1 200mmx200mm sheet Computer, 2-D Design 60

Use 2-D Design to produce the correct measurments and sizes needed for the components listed layout and size. Use

the attach tool to ensure all lines connect together to produce an accurate shape. Make sure the Step Lock is on at

1mm to ensure accuracy and preciseness.

Minimal Risk. Take regular breaks while working on the computer to prevent eye strain, back damage and

wrist problems. Chair must be stable and comfortable.

60

2 Cut out these parts using the laser cutter. X1 A2 sheet of 3mm MDF and x1 200mmx200mm of 3mm blue Acrylic. Computer, Laser Cutter 30

Place each sheet of MDF and Acrylic in turn into the Laser Cutter, at point 0,0. Lay down gently so as not to damage the laser cutter 'honeycomb' floor. Use Auto focas to line up the

laser with the MDF and Acrylic and set laser to 0,0 also so the base is cut within the material area. Make sure the Extractor

button is turned ON so dust and fumes (when cutting) are taken out of machine. MDF: cutting Speed of 2.3, Power of 100 and PPI 1524. Acrylic: Cutting Speed of 1.3, Power 100

and PPI 1522

Make sure Extractor is turned on so as not to inhale the fumes when the lid is opened and to reduce fire

risk. Make sure the Lid is completely closed and sealed before using the laser cutter so injuries are

prevented.

45

3 Check the measurements and sizes of the parts, and if necesary make adjustments.

Bookshelf parts are various dimensions. Circle Bookshelf: x5 Blue Circles of radius 28mm with

3mm radius circle cutout in middle. Round Tables: 4x circle radius 21mm, 10x circle radius 15mm and 6x circle radius 18mm all with 3mm radius

circle cutout in middle.

Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Disk Sander, Cross File, Glass Paper, Wet and Dry, Wood Vice. 10

Mark out onto the material surface the adjustments needed to be made. Use a sharp pencil so lines are accurate and precise. Use the disk sander to file any large amounts of

material down. Use a tri-square to ensure sanding is straight. Use Glass paper or wet and dry to smooth and even the

edges for a pleasing look. While sanding with cross file clamp in a vice for easier and more accurate sanding.

Wear goggle and an apron to use the disk sander. This protects both eyes and clothes. Tie long hair back.

5 (not many adjustments

needed)

4Take 3mm radius wood Dowel and cut x1: 55mm and x10: 24mm lengths of this dowel, for middle leg of tables and

middle pole of circle bookshelf.x1: 55mm and x10: 24mm lengths of 3mm radius

wood dowel.Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Scroll Saw, Glass

paper 20

Mark out the lengths of dowel needed to be cut onto the surface of the material with a sharp pencil to be precise. Use

a mm steel rule for accuracy and precise. Cut the dowel slowly with the scroll saw so as not to snap the tin dowel or to snap the blade of the machine. If ends are uneven once

cut, sand smooth using glass paper, using a sanding block for accuracy and to be even.

Wear goggles to protect eyes when using the scroll saw. Also tie long hair back. Make sure the extractor

is on to avoid dust in air. 15

5 Glue the bookshelves and tables together. Clamp/hold and leave to dry. All of Above

UHU glue, PVA Wood Glue, Masking Tape, Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Tri-square, G-

Clamps, Damp Cloth 90

Mark out, with a sharp pencil, where to position and glue the parts of the components. Use a Tri-square for accuracy. This

insures all parts line up correctly. Spread the glue evenly accross the material surface (thinly to avoid excess glue) and

clamp securly. Wipe any excess glue with a damp cloth. Leave for 24hrs minimum for a strong bond.

Minimal Risk. Use glue in a ventilated area to avoid breathing the fumes. 150

Square tables, floor decorations, corner leaflet holders/bookshelves

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1 Draw guidelines or outlines for the shapes of each component onto the surfaces of each material.

3mm MDF: 3x 80mmx40mm, 1x 56mmx28mm, 1x 60mmx100mm, curved floor decoration: 1x

70mmx70mm and 1x 150mmx150mm. 3mm Acrylic: All quater circles-x12 27mm (radius) (2

blue, 5 red, 5 yellow), x4 50mm (radius) (2 blue, 1 red, 1 yellow)

Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Tri-square, Masking tape, Compass, Eraser, Sharpener 20

Use a sharp pencil so the lines and marking are clear and precise. Use a tri-square to ensure all corners are 90 degrees that need to be. Use masking tape to mark onto the acrylic

surface. This allows the pencil markings to be seen clearly and it also protects the Acrylic surface from being scratched.

Minimum risk 30

2 Cut out all the parts to each component, using the scroll saw. As above Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Scroll Saw 40

Cut the component parts slowly with the scroll saw so as not to snap the material or to snap the blade of the machine. Cut

just outisde the drawn lines so as not to cut into the component parts needed area. This makes the parts more

accurate and are mroe likley to fit together.

Wear goggles to protect eyes when using the scroll saw. Also tie long hair back. Make sure the extractor

is on to avoid dust in air. 55

3If any adjustments need to be made to the size or shape of

the parts, make these changes. I.e. Sand down to change/fit correct shape.

As above Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Disk Sander, Cross File, Glass Paper, Wet and Dry, Wood Vice 30

Mark out onto the material surface the adjustments needed to be made. Use a sharp pecnil so lines are accurate and precise. Use the disk sander to file any large amounts of

material down. Use a tri-square to ensure sanding is straight. Use Glass paper or wet and dry to smooth and even the

edges for a pleasing look. While sanding with a cross file and wet and dry, clamp components in a vice for easier and more

accurate sanding.

Wear goggle and an apron to use the disk sander. This protects both eyes and clothes. Tie long hair back. 90

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

4 Sand and smooth the edges of these parts. As above Glass Paper, Wet and Dry, Sanding Block, Sharp Pencil, Tri-square 60

Use Glass paper (MDF) or wet and dry (Acrylic) to smooth and even the edges for a pleasing look. Use a sanding block to

ensure sanding is even and straight. Use a tri-square to ensure and check sanding smooth is straight and even.

Minimum risk 55

5Take 3mm radius wood Dowel and cut x3: 59mm and x33:

20mm and x4: 16mm lengths of this dowel, for legs of tables and poles of curved acrylic leaflet

holders/bookshelves.

x3: 59mm and x33: 20mm and x4: 16mm lengths of 3mm radius wood dowel

Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Scroll Saw, Glass paper 20

Mark out the lengths of dowel needed to be cut onto the surface of the material with a sharp pencil to be precise. Use

a mm steel rule for accuracy and precise. Cut the dowel slowly with the scroll saw so as not to snap the thin dowel or

to snap the blade of the machine. If ends are uneven once cut, sand smooth using glass paper, using a sanding block for

accuracy and to be even.

Wear goggles to protect eyes when using the scroll saw. Also tie long hair back. Make sure the extractor

is on to avoid dust in air. 15

6 Glue the bookshelves and tables together. Clamp/hold and leave to dry. All of Above

UHU glue, PVA Wood Glue, Masking Tape, Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Tri-square, G-

Clamps, Damp Cloth 90

Mark out, with a sharp pencil, where to position and glue the parts of the components. Use a Tri-square for accuracy. This

insures all parts line up correctly. Spread the glue UHU (Acrylic and MDF) and PVA (Wood to wood) evenly accross the material surface (thinly to avoid excess glue) and clamp securly. Wipe any excess glue with a damp cloth. Leave for

24hrs minimum for a strong bond.

Minimal Risk. Use glue in a ventilated area to avoid breathing the fumes. 150

CONT. Square tables, floor decorations, corner leaflet holders/bookshelves

Styrofoam Teachers Desk and Floor Decorations

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1Draw birds eye view of the shape/outline of the teachers desk onto the top surface of a block of Styrofoam, height

27mm. Curved shape. Overall space needed:

80mmx45mm of hieght 27mmSharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Masking tape,

Compass, Eraser, Sharpner, Shape Template (2-D Design)

25

Use a sharp pencil so the lines and marking are clear and precise. Alternative: complete the template of the birds eye

view on 2-D Design, print out onto A4 paper, cut out and draw around onto styrofoam. This is accurate and quicker, and

reduces errors.

Minimum risk 15

2 Sand down the sides of the Styrofoam block into the shape of the teachers desk. As above

Disk sander, Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Cross File, Curved File, Wet and Dry paper, Sanding

Block40

Sand to shape using the disk sander as this produces a smooth finish on the styrofoam. Sand slowly so as not to split or 'flake'

the delicate styrofoam surface. Constantly check that the sanding is straight (tri-square) and the shape is correct. This makes it accurate and even. Use wet and dry to smooth the

surface and make it even, using a sanding block for accuracy - even sanding.

To protect eyes wear goggles at all times while using disk sander. Wear apronto protect clothes. Tie long

hair back to prevent serious injury.45

3If any adjustments need to be made to the size or shape of

the parts, make these changes. I.e. Sand down to change/fit correct shape.

As above Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Disk Sander, Cross File, Glass Paper, Wet and Dry 10

Mark out onto the Styrofoam surface the adjustments needed to be made. Use a sharp pencil so lines are accurate and precise. Use the disk sander to file any large amounts of

material down. Use wet and dry paper to smooth and even the edges for a pleasing look.

Wear goggles and an apron to use the disk sander. This protects both eyes and clothes. Tie long hair back to prevent it getting caught in machine and

causing great injury.

5 (not many changes needed)

4Paint the surface of this block, and also the 2 floor decorations, a dark brown colour. This colour must compliment and match the whole model design.

Styofoam: Curved area of 80mmx45mm of hieght 27mm. Floor Decorations: 1x 70mmx70mm and

1x 150mmx150mm Brown Acrylic Paint, Brown Wood Paint,

Paint brush, Water, Cloth 50

If mixing paint to achieve correct colour, mix well so colour is consistent. Use a soft brush for an even paint finish and apply plenty of paint to surface of component for a more pleasing look. Remove any excess paint using a cloth or a dry paint

brush. If changing between colours, wash paint brush well to ensure even colour.

Wear apron to protect clothing. Paint in a ventilated area to avoid breathing in paint fumes. 40

5 Paint the surfaces of these components with clear varnish, after applying the brown paint. As above Clear Varnish, Paint Brush, Water, Cloth 30

Apply the varnish in a thin layer for a more sophisticated finish. Ensure the brown paint is completely dry before

applying the varnish. Use a soft brush for even paint finish. Remove any excess varnish with a cloth.

Wear apron to protect clothing. Paint in a ventilated area to avoid breathing in varnish paint fumes. 25

Gluing Components to Model

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1If any adjustments need to the made to the size and fit of the structure or components, make the changes before

gluing.

Whole model is 818mmx487mm of hieght 97mm. Components are various sizes (see all 3 sections above for more

details)

Sharp pencil, Tri-square, Steel Rule, Straight/disk sander, cross file, glass paper,

wet and dry paper, stanley knife and cutting mat.

20

If any adjustments need to be made, mark them out with a Sharp Pencil, Steel rule and Tri-square to be precise and accurate. Use the disk sander to sand down the edges quickly. Make sure the sanding

is straight by checking with a tri-square. Sand down the material edges to produce a smooth and even finish.

Wear goggles while using the disk sander, and an apron to prevent both eyes and clothes. Tie long hair back. 10

2 Glue the components to the model, in the correct positions. As above UHU glue, PVA wood glue, Tri-square, Sharp Pencil, Masking Tape, Damp Cloth, Steel Rule 100

Mark out where each component will be positioned onto base. Use pencil lightly and within area of components so the pencil marks

cannot be seen. Use a steel rule and tri-square for accuracy and to ensure components are positioned straight and in line with each other. Apply a thin layer of UHU to the edges of Acrylic and MDF.

This joins dissimilar materials. Also apply a thin layer of PVA to one surface of material (to join MDF and paper covered base) Apply

pressure to materials so the glue joins effectively. Use a damp cloth to remove an excess UHU or PVA glue and use the tri-square to ensure all components are being glued 90 degrees to the base.

Use glue in a well venitilated area so as not to inhale the fumes. Wear apron to protect clothes. Use

newspaper on work surface to protect it. 120

3 Clamp/hold and leave to dry (in a safe and secure place) As above Clamps, Masking Tape, extra wood piecesClamp while Gluing - 100

(as above)

Clamp areas that are easy and accessible to clamp. Use pieces of wood between the materials and the clamps to protect the

material surfaces. Areas that are difficult to clamp, apply pressure (after applying the glue) for approx 2mins before using masking

tape strongly to hold the components to the base.

Minimal risk. Watch finger so they don't get caught within clamp.

120 (as above)

2D Sign

Step No. Task Materials and Sizes required to complete the task

Tools, equipment and other resources required to complete the task

Estimated time

(Minutes)Quality Control (Ways you will ensure that the task is

completed to high standard).Hazards, Risks and Control Measure (Ways you

will ensure the task is carried out safely)Actual time (Minutes)

1 Produce the layout and outlines, for the design for the sign, on 2-D Design x1 A4 Sheet within 2-D Design Computer, 2-D Design 50

Use 2-D Design to produce the correct measurments and sizes needed for the sign. Keep Step Lock on 1mm to ensure accuracy.

Use the lines tool to create the correct shapes needed.

Minimal Risk. Take regular breaks while working on the computer to prevent eye strain, back damage and wrist

problems. Chair must be stable and comfortable. 60

2 Paste the outlines for the sign into Photoshop and create the colours, designs and patterns onto the sign 100mmx40mm space within Photoshop Computer, Photoshop 120

Use Photoshop to produce the correct designs needed, with accuracy. Use the eye-drop tool to pick the correct tones of colours

needed and to keep the colours consistent with the rest of the model. Use colour balance to make sure all designs and graphics

compliment each other. Use the Magic Wand tool to pick the correct space and area needed to be coloured or textured.

Minimal Risk. Take regular breaks while working on the computer to prevent eye strain, back damage and wrist

problems. Chair must be stable and comfortable. 115

3 Print the sign using an A4 Printer A4 sheet of paper Computer, 2-D Design 10 Check the printer is free of dust and dirt. Check that the ink is being printed consistently (test run first.)

Minimal risk. Don't place objects or fingers near the printer while printing. This makes sure you're safe and

the printing runs smoothly.5

4 Cut out the sign from the paper print Sign - 100mmx40mm Stanley Knife, Cutting Matt, Steel Rule 5

Make sure steel rule is flat on paper surface to ensure accurate cutting. Place edge of steel rule just before cutting line, outside the sign area to ensure you are not cutting within the sign itself. For the

waved edges of the sign, cut slowly and carefully so as to cut just outside cutting lines in the correct shape. Use the Stanley knife slowly to avoid tearing the edges of the paper, and hold Stanley

knife at an angle when cutting, not directly on point.

Hold Steel Rule firmly so as not to slip. Cut with the Stanley knife away from you to avoid injury's if you slip.

Use Stanley knife slowly and hold firmly to avoid slipping. Use cutting mat directly under the parts you

are cutting to avoid injuries or damaging the work surfaces.

5

5 Draw the outline of the sign onto the surface of Foamboard Space of 100mmx40mm Sharp Pencil, Compass, Template of Sign, Steel Rule, Eraser 5

Use a sharp pencil so the lines and marking are clear and precise. Print out a template of the outline of the sign (from 2-D Design) so that the curved outlines are accurately drawn onto the Foam board

surface. Minimal Risk 7

6 Cut out the sign shape from the Foamboard 100mmx40mm Stanley Knife, Cutting Matt, Steel Rule 30

Cut just outside the outline of the sign, so as not to cut into the sign itself. For the waved edges of the sign, cut slowly and carefully so as

to cut the correct shape. Use the Stanley knife slowly to avoid tearing the foam board, and hold Stanley knife at an angle when

cutting, not directly on point. Make sure cutting is directly vertical and not at an angle, as this won't be as aesthetically pleasing. Cut slowly and check regularly to make sure cutting s straight down.

Cut with the Stanley knife away from you to avoid injury's if you slip. Use Stanley knife slowly and hold

firmly to avoid slipping. Use cutting mat directly under the parts you are cutting to avoid injuries or damaging

the work surfaces.

35

CONT - 2-D Sign

7 If any adjustments need to be made to the size and shape of the Foam board or sign, make the changes

Sign shape x2 - Foam board and Paper - 100mmx40mm

Stanley Knife, Cutting Matt, Steel Rule, Sharp Pencil, Eraser, Wet and Dry paper 20

Mark out any changes with a sharp pencil for accuracy. Line up the printed sign and the foam board to check they are aligned and the

correct shapes. Use the Stanley knife to make the changes (see above for more details.) Use smooth wet and dry on the edges of

the foam board if small changes need to be made to its shape. Sand slowly to avoid tearing the foam board.

Again, cut with the Stanley knife away from you to avoid injury's if you slip. Use Stanley knife slowly and hold firmly to avoid slipping. Use cutting mat directly

under the parts you are cutting to avoid injuries. Minimal risks when sanding or marking changes.

15

8 Glue the sign to the Foamboard Sign - Foamboard, and paper - 100mmx40mm

Spray Mount/Adhesive, Double Sided Sticky Tape, Newspaper, Plain Paper 10

Hold the Spray Adhesive/Mount can at a 45 Degrees angle. This prevents any large amounts of the glue dripping. Spray the

Adhesive evenly and so all parts are covered allowing the gluing to be as effective as possible. Make sure your fingers are free of any

dirt or Adhesive so as not to damage the sign surface design. Attach to the foam board and use the spare piece of plain paper to smooth

down the graphics and to prevent any damage.

Use and spray the adhesive in a well ventilated area or in a fume box so the toxic fumes aren't breathed in.

Spray away from anything flammable to prevent fire. Wear protective clothing and also protect the work

surface to prevent damage.

10

9 Glue sign to model wall Sign – 100mmx40mm. Model wall entrance – 120mmx91mm

UHU Glue, Damp Cloth, Masking Tape, Sharp Pencil, Steel Rule, Tri-square 15

Spread a thin layer of UHU glue on both Acrylic wall surface and the back of the foam board sign. This prevents excess glue. Mark out on

the surface of the Acrylic wall (with masking tape on surface to protect the surface and prevent it from being scratched and

damaged,) where the sign will be positioned. Use a steel rule and tri-square for accuracy to ensure distances are equal and the sign is

positioned straight. Press the sign firmly onto the Acrylic wall surface for a strong bond. Use a damp cloth to remove excess glue.

Hold with masking tape and leave to dry completely.

Use UHU glue in a well ventilated area to prevent breathing in fumes. Where protective clothing and cover work surface with newspaper to protect both

clothes and surface of work bench. 20

Base and walls. 2D Design because its accurate and produced the double Acrylic walls the same shape and size. PVA was used to glue the base together because its strong and Tensol cement for the walls because this is very strong and instant dry. Cutting speed MDF – 0.7 Acrylic – 1.3, Power MDF – 100, Acrylic 100

Vacuum formed mould made from MDF because its easy to shape and slant the edges. Slanted edges (more than 90 degrees) and rounded corners. This makes the mould come out of the formed plastic easily.

Vacuum former – accurate and produced the platform of the right section of the Library well. White PS used because its flexible, tough and durable. It matched the white acrylic walls.

Goggles used for safety. Sanded edges of the scroll saw cut components to make the correct shape. Smoothes the edges also and makes the components accurate and makes them fit together well. Smoothing the edges of the Acrylic and MDF makes the edges even and aesthetically pleasing.

Disk sander used for Styrofoam because its quick and shapes the Styrofoam easily and accurately. Leaves a rough edge so edges are sanded with wet and dry to make even and smooth. Goggles used for safety and apron to protect clothes.

2-D Design layout of new design used as a guideline of where to position components in model. It was also used to create all the model in proportion and scale. Measurements shown in this layout were x100 and divided by 30 to create the model sizes. In reality the model is to a scale of 1:30 of the real Library. Makes it easy to transport and clear enough to see in detail the layout and designs.

2-D Design and Photoshop[ used for the graphics of the floors, walls and Sign because they create an accurate shape, and to size using the dimension lines and Attach tools. Photoshop allows effects to be used such as blending and transparency. This produced the graphics to a high quality and allowed all colours to be consistent – eye drop tool.

Foam board was very difficult to cut due to the edges tearing and even though the Stanley knife was used slowly, the edges were slanted. Instead, I used a back of blue Acrylic for the sign. This was cut using the laser cutter. This was more aesthetically pleasing, matched the sign and was joined to the wall a lot easier and more strongly using Tensol cement.

Spray Mount used for graphics because it was quick and spread the glue evenly across the paper surface. It was also a clean glue and didn’t show or damage the graphics surface.

UNIT E

Disk Styrofoam used for teachers desk because it is an excellent modelling material and easy to shape due to the soft material. It gave variety to the model. Paint was used to give the Styrofoam a complimenting colour to the model and to protect its surface.

Final Model Finished

2D Design used to create some of the components, e.g. Bookshelves, because it was accurate and was able to be used within the laser cutter which is quick and accurate. It produced multiple copies of [arts at the same size. The components were glued using PVA. MDf – 3mm because this was in proportion to the model.

Masking tape was used to hold the components while gluing so the bond was strong and the components were glued accurately. PVA was used in a ventilated area. It is strong, however dries slowly.

Curved bookshelves were produced from card – approx 1mm, because this showed variety. The curved edges were produced easily due to a flexible material used of 0.2mm approx. The bookshelves were then covered with printed out Google sketch up designs so it represented the real bookshelves well and were of a high quality and looked aesthetically pleasing.

and walls. These were all strong glues, however PVA and UHU dries slowly. Tensol cement was quick and very strong and instantly dried on Acrylic. Masking tape was used to hold the components in place while the glue dried.

Double sided sticky tape was used to attach some components to the model because it gave extra strength to the gluing. Apron was worn to protect clothes.

PVA, Tensol Cement, UHU were all used to glue the components to the model base

The dowels were left showing within the middle of the tables because it gave pattern to the design and matched the curved and flowing payout.

UNIT F11-13 14-15 16-17 18+

02468

1. Age?

Yes No0

5

10

15

20

2. Is the overall appearance of the model attractive?

Yes No02468

10121416

8. Is the 2-D Sign attractive and entic-ing?

Yes No Maybe Not straight away

0

2

4

6

8

10

9. If you saw this sign outside the Li-brary, would you be encouraged to

enter the Library?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10. On a scale of 1-10 how well does the 2-D Sign represent the interior of

the Library? 10 being highest.

Yes No05

101520

11. Does the model allow you to view the interior from many different an-

gles?

Yes No0

5

10

15

20

12. Is the model a clear repre-sentation of how the new design

of the Library would look?

Yes No0

5

10

15

3. Would the new layout of the Library (shown by the model) en-tice you to use the Library more

often?

1 2 3 4 5 6+02468

10

4. How many times a week would you now use the Library if it were

to look like this?

Yes No02468

1012141618

5. Are the colours appeal-ing to you?

Yes No0

5

10

15

20

6. Do all the colours compliment each other do you think?

Yes No02468

101214

7. Do the patterns and styles of the interior of the Library give you a different per-

spective of the Library?

Why? One student thought that the model was aesthetically pleasing because the colours went well together. He thought that the layout was fun and attractive because it was unique.Another student thought that the joins between the different pieces of paper on the base could have been joined better because the joins were visible. But apart from this she thought that the model was made well and was attractive and interesting.

Why? A male student of aged 16 thought that even though this new design was very unique and appealed more to the students at Haydon school, he probably wouldn’t use the Library because he had no need to. Another student thought that this new design would defiantly make her go into the Library, even if it were just to look at the new exciting design.

Why? A female student age 17 thought that colour scheme was eye catching due to the bright colours. She liked the idea that the colour scheme was carried throughout the Library including the components. This she thought linked the whole Library together. She did think however that the curved bookshelves needed to be of a paler ‘wood’ colour because they didn’t compliment the rest of the Library as well, mostly due to the paper.Another student of the same age however, thought that the colour scheme was too young for the sixth formers at Haydon school because they were primary. He thought maybe there needed to be a different colour scheme, maybe only 1 colour of different tones.

Why? One student thought the colours complimented each other very well. She found this surprising because she thought the colours should clash but they don’t. She thought this was because they were modern colours.Another student thought the colours went very well together and this made the whole model look together and pleasing to look at. Another student however, thought that the vinyl squares on the tables didn’t quite match the wall colours, however he thought that he was being too ‘picky’. Other than that he said the colour scheme was attractive and complimenting,

Why and How? The majority of students thought that the new design made them see the Library as fun and exciting due to the unique layout and bright modern colours. One student said that he would now go inside the Library more often because it wouldn’t be seen as a boring place. This meets the design brief therefore. Another student thought that this new design would make her go inside the Library because it was appealing and attractive, however she probably wouldn’t do any work in there because this isn’t her way of working. She thought perhaps the colours needed to be paler and less bright, and this would then let her work easier. She thought the waved patterns were slightly too distracting, even though they were only on 2 walls.

Why? One student thought that the sign was too small on the model, and therefore would be too small in reality. The student thought that if the images used on the sign were made larger then the sign would be more attractive because it would show clearly the new design of the Library.Another student thought that the sign was a pleasing composition due to the curved outlines leading your eye to different places on the sign. She did say however that even though the sign was attractive she might not enter the Library straight away but would come back later. A student aged 14 said that it would defiantly make him go inside the Library because of the bright and ‘funky’ colours of the sign. He would assume that the inside would be the same and would therefore want to go inside because it would be a ‘cool’ design due to the bright colours.

Why? A 15 year old student said that the sign represented the inside of the Library very well because the colours were the same, the patterns were the same and the images were very similar to the Library inside. However, what the student thought I could of done was to use real images or photo’s of the inside of the model on the sign outside the Library. He said this would give an even more real representation of the Library inside. This would give students more information also and the sign would be more professional.

Why? A student of age 16 said that the model was great to look at because it was clearly showing the new Library design. She said that it was really clear also because you could look at the model from so many different angles. She really liked the ides of the removable walls and said that this also made the model interactive and made her feel apart of the new design.One student thought that the curved bookshelves made from card didn’t show her these bookshelves would be produced in reality. In addition she thought that the stuck on graphics weren’t as professional or as finished off as the rest of the Library and they therefore weren’t as attractive. She said next time I should make them out of materials that complimented the rest of the model, like the Acrylic and MDF. Another student however thought that these curved bookshelves gave variety to the model, however he said they weren’t very strong and could’ve been made from as stronger material.

Questionnaire asking my target market their opinions about the model:

By asking my target market what they thought of the model, I received third-party evaluation and this allowed me to know others thoughts on the model. This let me see clearly what

changes could be made so that the model would appeal to the target market more. For example, I have found that the colour scheme was exciting and attractive, however most of the sixth

form students thought the primary colours were aimed more for the younger years. I can now take this information and next time I

would change the colour scheme slightly so the model would attract to these ages as well.

In this part of the project, I will be testing and evaluating my models success by carrying out a variety of tests on the

model that will show how successful my model was, what aspects were really

good, where I went wrong and how I could improve next time.

Could you give me any improvements I could make to the overall model?One student said that the sign on the outside of the model should be made bigger. This would make it more in proportion and the text would be more visible.Another student suggested that the removable walls had a covering of clear plastic to them. This would protect the paper underneath, and make it last longer.A student aged 15 said that to make the model easier to carry, the base should be one big square, rather than the complicated shape it is now. He said this would make it easier to grip and carry. Another student thought that the structure could be made form a lighter material and this would make it easier to carry also as it wouldn’t be as heavy.A few students also commented on the curved bookshelves. They wondered why they were made out of card when the rest of the Library was made from stronger materials. One student suggested that next time these bookshelves should be produced from MDF and Acrylic to compliment the rest of the model.

Could you give me any improvements I could make to the layout, colours and styles of the model?One student said that the colour scheme could perhaps be less bright because she thought that this colour scheme would distract her from working if she were to use the Library.Another student said that instead of the primary colours used (which he thought was too young for sixth formers) could just be one colour of different tones. He said the model would still be as attractive and unique but would appeal to all the students at the school instead of a few.One student said that the colour scheme and patterns were fantastic and were very attractive and modern. She said there wouldn’t be anything she would change apart from perhaps some of the floor joins (paper) needed to be more accurate because some of them could be seen. One student commented that the sign could have real photo’s of the inside of the model instead of computerised ones. He said this would link well to the model and would give a clear representation of the interior. He did say though that the sign was really good and appealed because of the pleasing composition and colours.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1002468

101214

13. On a scale of 1-10 how easy is the model to transport? 10 being highest

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

2

4

6

8

10

12

14. How easy is the model to use and view on a scale of 1-10? 10 being highest.

Yes No Could be clearer02468

101214

15. Are the removable walls clear to you?

Why? The majority of students asked thought that the model was quite difficult to carry because it was very big and heavy. They also said that the model was quite awkward to carry due to the difficult and different shape of the model. Next time they thought perhaps I could have a large square base. This would make it easier to grip and hold and therefore easier to carry also. They thought the model was quite heavy and one student said maybe I could have made the structure out of a lighter material. However this would have meant that the model wouldn’t be as durable. One student thought it was fairly easy to carry, however he was very tall. The majority of students were average height, and this was the ergonomics I was using. Therefore this doesn’t meet the specification as well as I thought it did.

Why? The majority of students thought the removable walls could be clearer because they spent a long time trying to find them. This was mainly done by touching the walls to see if they moved. The far left wall was thought to be easy to find because of the clear joint but the other wall wasn’t a clear. One student aged 17 thought next time I could include instructions to the model to make it clear how to view and use the model. This would also prevent the risk of it breaking. Another student said maybe the removable walls could be highlighted in some way by a label or instruction stuck to the outside of the wall. This would make it clear. One student said that the far left wall was difficult to take out because it was slightly too tight for the model. He thought this was because of the paper covering. Next time I would make the slot approx 1mm wider. This would give extra room for movement. Another student said that removing the walls also damaged the edges of the paper covering and next time I could add a clear plastic covering that protected the paper.

Fonts, Images, Resolution and Consistency?The fonts used on the 2-D Sign of my model are clear and readable. The fonts have an outlined colour which allows them to stand out against the background. The florist model also has a crisp and clear font

Styles?The styles of my model are very different to the styles of the architectural model. However this model was of a florist and was therefore aimed at a different target market. However, his styles and designs all compliment each other. My model’s styles, colours and designs all compliment each other also. The colour is consistent and my wall paper designs and colours match the acrylic colours, which is exactly what this florist model has achieved.

To compare to the real Library, my model is far more complimenting. It is also aimed far more at the students and entices them to use the Library more often, found out from the questionnaire. My colours are consistent, and the Library also has consistent colours. This makes my model aesthetically pleasing.

Comparing my model with other similar products: The Current Haydon Library, and a Florist Architectural Model.

Durability and Stability?My model is stable due to the strong permanent bonds and joins. However, the florist model is more durable and stable than my own model. This is because each wall supports another wall through the use of joints. The interconnecting wall on the inside of this model provides extra strength. This model is also smaller and therefore easier to transport. My model is large and due to the 2 halves of the model, the components inside are not as durable as they are not as well protected. Also, some of the components have limited gluing area (for example the bookshelves) and aren’t stuck to the model as durably as could be. In addition, because the walls of my model are tall in height (97mm), they aren’t as stable within the model structure. Next time I would change this by making the groove of the base of the model 6mm more in depth. This would support the walls more and provide more strength. I have covered my walls and floors with paper to not only show the designs and patterns but to protect the material underneath. The florist model also does this, but this model also has paint on the walls. This gives extra protection. However, my model walls are made form a different material and the Acrylic has its own finishing and is therefore as protected. However the Acrylic is more brittle and not as tough as the MDF the florist model uses, however it is as aesthetically pleasing. The florist model however isn’t as stable because some of its components are not permanently joined to the base of the model. All the components within my model are permanently joined to the base and this therefore protects them and makes my model durable. Also, the florist model has a lid which protects the inside layout and components. Next time I would make a lid for my model to make it more durable.

Quality, Properties and Suitability of Materials in the Model?The materials I used within model are very suitable for the model. They are durable in themselves and they represent the real Library well. Apart from the white Acrylic walls which don’t represent the real walls of the Library as well. Next time I could use MDF for the walls, however this isn’t as aesthetically pleasing or unique. Each of my components are of a high quality due to the neat finishes. No glue shows and the model is accurate. This florist model is also of a high quality due to the aesthetically pleasing finishes. The colours are bright and consistent due to the plastics. In addition, this model fits accurately together with the correct dimensions. There are no gaps within the florist model structure. My model however does have a few gaps within the structure of the model. This could be improved by a few of the walls having more of a height or width of about 2mm or so. See Image right.

Ergonomics, Dimensions and Sizes?My model has the correct ergonomics for an average person to handle and view the model (see unit A). The removable walls are easily gripped and taken from the model. The florist model is also ergonomically suitable. It is the correct size to transport and is a lot lighter in weight than my model, making it easier to transport. Next time I would produce my model to a smaller dimension, perhaps instead of a scale of 1:30 having a scale of 1:40, making the model slightly smaller, easier to transport, however not so small that the model can’t be viewed in detail. My model can be seen clearly due to the large size (800mmx480mm approx). This also made the model easier to produce. Like the florist model, my model can be viewed from different angles and can therefore be seen clearly. My model has a few removable walls, just like the florist model which allows the model to be viewed at a different angle and perspective.My model is in proportion as the sizes and dimensions are all correct. From the prototype I increased the height of the model by about 5mm which allows the model to look more in proportion to itself and it is also now in proportion to the real Library. My whole model is also in proportion to the real Library. This therefore allows the viewers to relate to the real Haydon School Library and this allows them to compare and contrast the designs. It also allows the viewers to have a clear view of what the Library would look like if it were produced to the new design.

Construction Techniques and Assembly?My model closely relates to the florist model due to the joints and techniques used. For example, my model has ‘grooves’ within the base that allow the walls to slot into. This guides the walls and makes the structure more stable. The florist model also has base grooves, however these grooves aren’t as deep as mine. In addition, the florist model has cross halving joints at every corner of the model. This not only allows for the removable wall to slot back into place easily, but gives extra gluing area to the permanent joining walls and provides extra strength and stability. I only have 1 cross halving joint within my model for the removable wall. The other walls are all ‘butt’ joints and aren’t as stable. Next time I would perhaps use cross halving joints or another form of strong joint (finger joints, mitre joints) at every corner of my model. This would make the model more stable and would give the walls more of a permanent joint. In addition, the florist model used the process of Vacuum Forming for steps, which is the process I used for my platform within the Library. Both are aesthetically pleasing and durable, and represent the platforms and stairs well in reality. I however, also used Styrofoam and card within my model, which are materials that the florist model hasn’t used. This gives variety to my model. However, these materials are more delicate and aren’t as durable as the MDF and Acrylic that the florist model has used throughout. The card curved bookshelves within my model aren’t very stable due to the flexible material, and perhaps next time I would use 3mm MDF and 3mm blue Acrylic for the curved bookshelves instead.

due to the use of the Laser Cutter. However, it doesn’t have any colour or images on the sign which isn’t as attractive. But the sigh in simple and compliments the purple inside. My model sign also compliments the inside of my Library. My images are clear due to the high resolution. The patterns and designs of the inside of my model are crisp and have a clear outline. The resolution is high which means the model is of a higher quality. The colour is also consistent.The real Library doesn’t have a sign outside the Library and this is therefore hard to compare to. However, the inside of the Library has plain and simple colours and the colours are consistent

throughout the Library, just like my model.

Current Haydon School Library

Is the product aesthetically pleasing? How high is the quality?The final model of the Library is aesthetically pleasing due to the complimenting colours and designs. The reds, blues and yellows of the Acrylic also match and compliment the wall designs. This makes the overall look and layout of the model pleasing. The layout of the interior of the model is pleasing because the colours are balanced out well between the components and they also compliment the colours of the design. This meets the specification. But, the curved bookshelves don’t compliment the design as well as they could due to the ‘wood’ tone effect being the wrong colour. This needs to be paler and more of a light brown tone. This would make the overall look pleasing. The layout is pleasing due to the flowing shape of the overall layout. The quality of the product is high due to the model being finished off neatly and precisely. The components and wall structures all fit together neatly and accurately. There are a few gaps however between a few of the walls. This was mainly due to the laser cutter taking off a mm of the material while cutting and also I didn’t always sand straight, which was difficult to achieve.

Testing Different Aspects of my Final Product

How well and precise is the model finished off? (E.g. Can glue be seen etc?) How well does the structure fit together?The model is finished off quite neatly due to everything fitting together neatly and precisely, which mostly meets the specification. All edges and corners are sanded down and are smooth, therefore reducing the risk of injury. This meets the specification well as the model is safe to use. There are however a few gaps of 2mm between some of the slotting in walls, which does spoil the neat finished look of the model. The paper covered curved bookshelves aren’t finished to the highest standard because the joins of the paper can be seen clearly. Next time, I would produce these curved bookshelves from MDF and Acrylic which would give them a higher quality finish. All the glues used were transparent and clear when dry and therefore glue can’t be seen, apart from some of the UHU glue used within the components. This was hard to get rid of due to the components needing this extra glue for a strong bond. In addition, the glue can be seen through the clear and transparent walls of the model. This isn’t aesthetically pleasing. Next time, either less glue could be used or the walls should only be clear and transparent from the top of the base up (rather than within the ‘grooves’ of the base. The components

How easy and smooth is it to take apart the removable parts from the model?As stated above, to split the model into its 2 halves isn’t as easy due to the overhanging walls on the left half of the model. This can be improved by cutting these walls at the end of the half and gluing them into place onto the right/other half of the model. This would also make the model easier to transport and easier move apart or fit together. The 2 removable walls within the model structure are quite difficult to slot back into place once taken out. This is due to the thin joins of the cross halving joints, which are delicate. In addition, the left removable wall doesn’t have a ‘stopper’ for the left of the wall (see image.) This makes the wall less stable and can easily come away from the model. This isn’t as aesthetically pleasing. The walls are easy to remove from the model however.

How securely are the removable parts and components held within the structure of the model? The removable parts are held securely within the model due to the tight joints and tight fittings. Again, the left removable wall doesn’t have a ‘stopper’ for the cross halving joint on the left of the wall (see image.) This makes the wall less stable and can easily come away from the model. This isn’t as aesthetically pleasing. The walls are easy to remove from the model however. There are no loose parts to the model, as most removable parts are held firmly in place until taken apart. This meets the specification well. The cross halving and slot joints allow the removable walls to be held firmly and securely in place. The far left removable wall needs to have a back to the cross halving joint that is at least 5mm in width to create a strong joint. The other removable wall has a perpendicular wall that needs to be 2mm more in length to allow this removable wall to slot and stay firmly in place. This would also get rid of the gap and make this part of the model more aesthetically pleasing. The inside components are held securely in place due to the permanent glue used to attach these components to the base and walls of the model. One of the curved bookshelves and tables however isn’t as secure as the rest of the components due to it hanging over the edge of the left half of the model (when the model is split in half). The UHU glue used to attach the Acrylic components to the base of the model isn’t as strong as the PVA wood glue however and therefore this bond isn’t as permanent

or durable.

How clear are the graphics of the model? Is the 2-D Sign aesthetically pleasing and complimenting to the rest of the model?The graphics and designs of the model are very clear and crisp. The colours are consistent throughout and the lines of the patterns are precise. The floor of the model could be seen as being slightly blurred, however this was the effect I was trying to achieve because it represent the texture of wood – rough and not as crisp coloured. The pale cream coloured walls aren’t as consistent in colour due to the very pale colour. These walls show dust and dirt easily and therefore are very hard to keep clean while working on the model. Next time, I would apply these pale cream coloured walls to the model last as this would keep the walls free from dirt. The sign of the model is also very clear and consistent, and this therefore makes the quality of the product seem high. The colours and patterns compliment the model well as it uses the same colours. The sign is also clear to read due to the text being bold and outlined in contrasting colours to the backdrop. This meets the specification. The floor of the model could however be of a higher quality. The joins of the paper can be seen quite clearly which wasn’t the objective. Some of these joins are hidden by the components, however most can still be seen. Next time more care must be taken when cutting out and laying down these graphics onto the floor so that the patterns of one piece of paper match exactly to the adjacent, therefore the join is almost invisible.

Is the model durable and stable? Is the model a clear representation of the final design for the Library, therefore meeting the specification?The model is a clear representation of the final design for the Haydon School Library. The model is in proportion due to the accurate dimensions produced. The materials used also represent the final Library well. The White Acrylic walls are less of a representation, so perhaps next time MDF would have represented the real walls better. However this wouldn’t have been as aesthetically pleasing or complimenting to the model. The curved bookshelves made from card are also less of a representation, however this gave a variety of material and therefore meets the specification is a different way. The materials used are very durable and therefore secure and the model is also secure. Everything is held in place which firmly, however a few of the components have minimal gluing area and aren’t as secure as could be therefore (e.g. Bookshelves on raised platform – only have base glued.) In addition, the raised platform middle is quite flexible due to the flexible material used and the weight of the components on top. Next time I would put a support underneath, perhaps MDF, to support the PS and prevent it from caving in the middle. Each material used is durable in itself due to the finishing's protecting the materials and also the materials are tough. This all meets the specification. The model can be viewed from nearly every angle due to the clear and transparent walls, the removable walls, the opened roof and also the model being able to split in half. This shows the viewer what the Library would look like from every angle, and they would get an idea of what it would be like to walk inside the real Library. This therefore meets the specification. The layout and shapes and patterns of the model are exactly the same to how the real and final Library design would be.

are all in position and are stuck securely to the model. However, when the model is split into its two halves to be viewed from the inside, the walls of the left half overhang over the end. (See image). This can be improved by cutting these walls at the end of the half and gluing them into place onto the right/other half of the model. This would also make the model easier to transport and move apart or fit together. The wood dowels can be seen in the middle of the tables. This was the effect I was trying to achieve as it creates a pattern to the model, and compliments the design. But I think next time I would cover these tops as they aren’t as neat as could be.

Are the ergonomics of the model correct? (How easy is it to handle the model and view it?) Can the model be transported with ease? The overall model is approx 800mmx480mm by height 97mm. Due to the size, I have made the model easier to transport by allowing the model to be split into 2 halves. This not only makes the model smaller and therefore easier to handle, but it makes the model lighter to carry also, which meets the specification. The model is capable of being transported, however it can’t be carried for long distances due to the quite large size. Because the model is made from 6mm MDF this makes the model heavy, however the ergonomic data is correct because it can be lifted by the average person (from feedback students say it is comfortable to carry for short distances.) The model is the correct ergonomics for average person use (see unit A for details.) The parts of the model are the correct dimensions. The walls allow a persons hand to fit round the top and bottom and therefore hold the removable walls firmly and with ease. The model is large enough to be seen in detail, and the colours and layout are therefore shown clearly. This makes the model more aesthetically pleasing and complimenting. This therefore meets the specification very well.

Is the spacing and layout of the model the correct dimensions? Does it therefore meet the specification?The layout of my model is very similar and exact to the intended design dimensions. The layout appears to look exactly the same to the human eye which is aesthetically pleasing. The measurements between the components within the model are very similar to those of the design. However there is a difference of about 2 or 3mm between the intended dimensions of the model and the real dimensions of the model. This isn’t as accurate as it could be. To change this, next time I would double check all my measurements while gluing the components to eliminate errors. In addition, the gaps between each square bookshelf is not equal, approx 1 or 2mm difference. This isn’t noticeable however. The measurements allow the average person to walk between the components (in reality) and therefore give enough movement. This meets the specification. For example 40mm between the yellow table and the bookshelf would be 1.2m in reality. This defiantly gives enough room for movement and for the person sitting down at the table to also pull there chair out and in etc. which meets the specification requirements. The design in spacious which not only allows for movement but is aesthetically pleasing and makes the room lighter and more modern. Within the specification, it was said the tables needed to be approx 80mm in length (model) to fit 6 people around the table in reality. The coloured tables allow for 6 people to fit around. Within the model they are exactly 80mm which meets the specification well. This would give each person room of approx 0.85m in reality which gives each person enough room for movement – see unit A.

133

4317

1330

17 30

43

33

47100

67

3047

34

24

40

452828

202524

40

90

40

120 To the right is the final design of my model. The measurements shown are a few of the

important dimensions between the components in mm. These show the

dimensions that should be within my model. This is so I can see whether my model

represents reality well, allowing students to move between components and sit down at table easily etc. The image to the left shows

my final finished model with the actual dimensions and measurements of the model

for comparison.

Measurements in mm

Measurements in mm

Is the product overall sustainable? Is the environmental damage used to make this model small? There was a lot of energy used to create this model. This was mainly due to the use of machines such as the Laser Cutter and the Vacuum Forming Machine. These both use up a lot of energy and electricity and therefore harm the environment. In addition, the materials used to produce the model are quite damaging to the environment and are unsustainable, therefore not quite meeting the specification. The MDF and wood come from the raw material of trees which are cut down to produce the wood. This damages the environment greatly. The energy required to convert oil into plastic Acrylic, Vinyl and polystyrene is large and in addition oil is a non-renewable resources and is finite. This isn’t sustainable as we are using these recourses up for future generations. The energy used also produced greenhouse gases which damages the environment and leads to global warming which isn’t good at all. However, once the model has been finished with it can be disposed of quite well. The polystyrene plastic and paper can both be recycled and this therefore saves recourses and prevents less waste in landfill. This is very sustainable and meets my specification. The MDF wood can be reused which also saves recourses. If it were to be dumped in landfill it would take a very long time to decompose, however it would in the end. This isn’t as sustainable as the recyclable materials. The Acrylic however isn’t sustainable at all. It can’t be recycled and will therefore be dumped in landfill. (This doesn’t meet the specification well.) This is also a problem because Acrylic doesn’t biodegrade and this therefore takes up space and damages the environment greatly (methane produced, sight pollution etc.) However, the pieces of Acrylic I did use within the model can be reused if needed. This is a suitable alternative as this both saves resources and prevents the acrylic from being dumped into landfill.

Product Life Cycle

MDFAcrylic Wood Dowel

Rigid Polystyrene CardFoam

Board PaperStyrofoam Vinyl

Crude Oil TreesDeforestation

Chemical Pollutants used

Drilling Activities

Vast amounts energy used – CO2 Emissions

Laser CutterVacuum Forming Machine

Scroll Saw, Disk Sander

Computer

Sandpaper, Wet and Dry, File

Paint

Spray Adhesive

UHU Glue PVA Wood Glue

Tensol Cement

Assembly

Use of Model

Waste

Recycle Reuse Recover Landfill

Computer

Laser Cutter

Scroll Saw, Disk Sander

Sandpaper, Wet and Dry, File

Computer

UHU Glue

Sandpaper, Wet and Dry, File

Scroll Saw, Disk

Sander

UHU Glue

Paint

UHU Glue Computer

Printer

Scroll Saw, Disk

Sander

Sandpaper, Wet and Dry, File

PVA

PVA

A lot of energy is used to extract the oil due to drilling. This uses energy and resources. Turning crude oil into plastic produces a lot of Carbon Dioxide which leads to global warming.

Crude oil is finite and therefore the plastic produced from the crude oil must be recyclable or reusable to save resources and environment.

Deforestation occurs to get the tree wood needed to turn into paper, card and wood. This

damages the environment and leaves visual evidence also. This isn't sustainable at all.

Trees can be replanted however and they are therefore not a finite resources – sustainable.

The chemical pollutants damage the environment and atmosphere.

These show how each material was used within the manufacturing of the model. Some processes are more impacting on the environment than others. Some processes also produce more waste than others.

If the Acrylic and MDF is not reused or recovered it will have to be dumped into landfill which isn’t sustainable or environmentally friendly

at all. Landfill produces greenhouse gasses such as methane and produces sight pollution.

The laser cutter uses a lot of energy which damages the environment, especially because it was used a lot within the manufacture. Next time, I would produce more of the components by hand, using the scroll saw as this doesn’t use as much energy. However this process does produce more waste materials.

All the glues and paints used are pollutants due to the fumes. This damages the environment and can lead to

more cases of asthma etc. This affects peoples health also and is therefore not sustainable. However, only a small

amount of glue was used during the manufacture of the model and therefore it doesn’t affect the environment

much – it was used efficiently. This is good and meets the specification,

Not a lot of sandpaper was used because I reused the same pieces of sandpaper and

wet and dry a couple of times. But these papers also come from trees and use a lot

of energy to produce them. This isn’t sustainable. However, I used these

resources efficiently and therefore not a lot of damage was done – sustainable.

The use of the model doesn’t require any energy and is therefore not impacting on the environment at all, in any way. This is efficient and sustainable and meets my specification.

The amount of materials used within the model was reduced because I used the materials efficiently. I reused materials were available and I used the materials space well. I tightly packed all the shapes of the components within the material so less waste was produced. This is all sustainable and helps to protect the environment – meets specification.

As discussed in the paragraph at the top of this page, the Polystyrene, Paper, card and the wood dowel can all be recycled. This saves these materials from being dumped in landfill and therefore saves money and is friendly to environment. However, plastic is hard to sort into groups to recycle and this can be a problem. Also, the more times the card and paper are recycled, the lower the quality.

The acrylic and MDF can all be reused and this therefore saves resources and energy and also materials. This is environmentally friendly and sustainable.

Some of the energy used to produce my model and to produce materials I have used within my model can be recovered by incinerating some materials like the MDF. This can retrieve the energy

lost within the manufacturing and can generate electricity and energy to use elsewhere. This isn’t ideal however because it can lead to serious health problems.

Vacuum Forming produces a lot of waste material due to the mould needed to be made before hand, and the amount of plastic wasted afterwards is large. This isn’t sustainable or environmentally friendly.

Below is a process tree that shows the life cycle of my model from ‘cradle to grave’. The materials

used are shown in a variety of colours and each of these are a different size to show the proportions of the amounts of each material I used within the

model. This also shows how environmentally impacting they are. I have also explained the

impacts of each material, process and waste of the model to show how overall environmentally

friendly or sustainable my model is or isn’t.

From the last slide, overall I can see that my model was fairly environmentally friendly and sustainable during the manufacture. Even though there was a lot of energy and resources used within my model, it was difficult to not use the energy due to the machines and processes needed. This isn’t sustainable. However I tried to keep the waste at a minimum and I used the materials efficiently. This is sustainable and meets the specification. In addition, if all the materials used within my model are either reused, recycled or recovered, this cancels out a lot of the energy used initially and is therefore very environmentally friendly.

Why did each of the tests carried out help me judge the success of my model?

By carrying out a questionnaire I was able to ask my target market what they thought of the overall product and model. They gave me very good constructive feedback which I was then able to change into how I could improve my model next time. They also let me see the success of the model by asking them different questions concerning the styles and layout. They gave me feedback on whether the new layout and design of the Library would entice them to use the Library more often and why. Because the new layout and design would entice them and attract them into the Library more often, the styles aspect of my model was shown to be a success. By asking my target market their thoughts, I was viewing the success of the model based on the people that I aimed the model at. This is an excellent way of testing the success of my model. Also by asking specific questions about the model, lets me here feedback in detail. This allows me to see any changes I could make in the future.

Comparing my finished model with another similar model and also the real Library allowed me to see the success of my model. By comparing certain aspects of the models I was able to see what worked well within my own model, that also worked well within the similar model. I was able to see also what changed could be made to my model that would improve the quality and performance. I was able to take ideas from the existing florist model that would have worked well on my own model, to see how I could improve it and why. I was also able to see why certain things of my model worked well, for example the patterns and designs, by comparing it to the similar model, where the colours also worked well. Comparing a few aspects of my model to the real Library also allowed me to see how the design and layout of my model has been improved from the existing Library. I was also able to see why my model was more enticing due to the exciting colours and unique layout, that the existing Library doesn’t have.

Testing the different aspects of my final model allowed me to see what worked well within my model and what didn’t work so well. It also let me see what could be improved within the model to improve the performance and quality of the model. I was able to look in great detail at my model and this therefore allowed me to see what the overall model’s performance was. By looking at my model in detail I was able to see the success of each different aspect which allowed me to view the overall success of the model. I was also able to give measureable detail regarding the dimensions of the model and how everything fit together, and how it could be done differently next time. For example, a few of the walls needed to be a few mm more or less in length to let the model work and look more pleasing and together.

Improvements I would make to my model, based on the test results:By carrying out a variety of tests on my finished model, I have been able to see what changes and improvements could be made to improve the model’s performance and quality. This would make the model overall more successful.

o Firstly, the wall and floor designs were printed onto A4 paper, because the A3 printer wasn’t working. This meant that there were more pieces of paper to cut out and join together. The joins are visible in certain places and this isn’t a high quality finish. From testing the different aspects of my model I have decided to improve this next time, by printing out the designs onto A3 paper, therefore leaving less joins that could be made. In addition, I would be more careful and accurate with the joins of the paper (including within the curved bookshelves), making sure each pattern of floor lines up correctly and making sure there were no gaps. I would measure out the sizes of each piece so that they are equal and therefore the joins would look more pleasing as they would be equal.o In addition, I would’ve used double sided sticky tape around the edges of the floor and wall coverings as this would give the paper graphics more strength and would be more durable. It would prevent the edges coming away from the materials. oThirdly, I would apply a plastic covering to the removable walls. This would protect the paper, especially at the edges, because the more you remove the walls, the more likely the paper is to come away from the edges of the Acrylic – friction. The plastic covering would also protect the walls against dust and dirt.o I would also produce the curved bookshelves from MDF and Blue Acrylic instead of card. The students I questioned thought that the card wasn’t as complimenting to the design. The MDF and Acrylic would also be more durable to the model. o From the questionnaire, the students also said that the model would be easier to transport if the base was one large square instead of the complicated shape it is now. This would give the base more grip and wouldn’t be as awkward to carry. It would make transporting the model easier. o From comparing my model to the florist model, I have found that having a join at each corner of the model wall would be more durable and stable to the model. However this would take a lot more time to complete.o Also from comparing to the florist model I would make a lid to protect the inside components from dust and dirt. It would also give a clear representation of the roof of the Library in reality.o From the student questionnaire, I have also decided that next time I would include real photos of the interior of the model on the sign. This would give a clearer representation of what the model and real Library would look like on the inside, if only looking at the sign from the outside. This would better meet the specification also.o From testing the different aspects of my model, I would leave 0.5-1mm more room in each groove and wall slot within the model. This would give more room for the walls to slot into the base and each other. It wouldn’t damage the Acrylic wall surface either and would make the model easier to manufacture and handle. In addition, the cross halving joint of the far left removable wall needs to be less delicate. The thin material that is after the gap/slot of the joint would be 5mm longer. This would make it more durable and prevent the cross halving joint from snapping. o I would also be more accurate at joining the walls together so there would be no gaps. This is difficult however, because this is just human error. Perhaps next time I would produce the white Acrylic walls from 6mm Acrylic not 3mm. This would save me from having a double thickness of acrylic wall. This would also be more accurate because there would be no need to sand the edges to make them level. o From carrying out the life cycle of the model, I have decided that the Acrylic components within the model could be produced from MDF that is either painted or paper covered. The Acrylic walls could also be produced from 6mm MDF. This would make my model far more sustainable as the wood can be recycled and reused and there is less energy used because the Acrylic doesn’t need to be produced from oil. o In addition, from testing different aspects of my model, next time I would not have the overhanging walls on half of the base. (See Image). I would cut the walls at the end of the half, and stick them permanently to the other half. This would make the model easier to take apart, and therefore would improve the performance of the model. It would make the model more pleasing and finished also, improving the quality. o From comparing my model to the florist model, I have also decided that next time I would make the grooves of the base 6mm deeper (an extra layer.) This would make the structure more durable and would give the walls more gluing area to glue to the base – more stable. This improves the performance of the model. o Lastly, from testing different aspects of my model, next time I would make the polystyrene platform the exact fit of the right section of the Library. This would make it more aesthetically pleasing due to there being no gaps. This would improve the quality of the model. I would also make a support for underneath this platform. It would also mean that the components would be more accurately glued to the platform also, as they would have more gluing area, and would be right up against the walls. This would give the model a far higher finish and quality.