Interactivity in Exhibits

49
Interactivity in Exhibits Some Thoughts on Doing Them Well

description

 

Transcript of Interactivity in Exhibits

Page 1: Interactivity in Exhibits

Interactivity in Exhibits

Some Thoughts on

Doing Them Well

Page 2: Interactivity in Exhibits

About Me…

• Working in museums for 18 years or so

• Started out in Evaluation/Audience Research

• Moved on to exhibit planning and development and project management

• Design firms and museums

Page 3: Interactivity in Exhibits

About Me…

• At the end of January, I had spent 4+ years at the Boston Children’s Museum

• Groundbreaker in development of hands-on interactivity in museums

Page 4: Interactivity in Exhibits

About Me…

• As of 1 February – Waterloo Region Museum• West of Toronto• New, $ 25 million museum + exhibits, with

interactive components

Page 5: Interactivity in Exhibits

Some Myths

• They’re only for kids, not adults

• Only useful in children's’ museums and science centres

• Can’t coexist with artifacts

• Just push buttons

• Just computer kiosks

• Just mechanical

• Always break

• Cost too much

• You can convey the same information with text

• You can explain any complex or abstract concept with them

Page 6: Interactivity in Exhibits

This Is Not an Interactive…

Page 7: Interactivity in Exhibits

PISEC – A Way to Look at Them

• 1998 study of family friendly exhibits

• Conducted by Minda Borun

• Included:– Franklin Institute– New Jersey State Aquarium– Philadelphia Zoo– Academy of Natural Sciences

• 7 characteristics of family friendly exhibits

Page 8: Interactivity in Exhibits

1. Multi-Sided

• Family can cluster around exhibit

Page 9: Interactivity in Exhibits

Brookfield Zoo

Page 10: Interactivity in Exhibits

V & A

Page 11: Interactivity in Exhibits

2. Multi-User

• Interaction allows for several sets of hands or bodies– Tied to multi-sided

Page 12: Interactivity in Exhibits

V & A

Page 13: Interactivity in Exhibits

KidStage

Page 14: Interactivity in Exhibits

Peep’s World

Page 15: Interactivity in Exhibits

The Common

Page 16: Interactivity in Exhibits

Game On!

Page 17: Interactivity in Exhibits

3. Accessible

• Comfortably used by children and adults

Page 18: Interactivity in Exhibits

Making America’s Music

Page 19: Interactivity in Exhibits

Making America’s Music

Page 20: Interactivity in Exhibits

The Common

Page 21: Interactivity in Exhibits

History is All Around Us

Page 22: Interactivity in Exhibits

4. Multi-Outcome

• Observation and interactions are sufficiently complex to foster group discussion– Not always appropriate in a non-science

setting– “Open-ended” might be a better term

Page 23: Interactivity in Exhibits

Raceways at BCM

Page 24: Interactivity in Exhibits

Raceways at BCM

Page 25: Interactivity in Exhibits

Children of Hangzhou

Page 26: Interactivity in Exhibits

The Common

Page 27: Interactivity in Exhibits

5. Multi-modal

• Appeals to different learning styles and levels of knowledge– This is really very difficult in a single exhibit

element– Best achieved by using various techniques

throughout an exhibit

Page 28: Interactivity in Exhibits

6. Readable

• Text is arranged in easily understood segments

Page 29: Interactivity in Exhibits

Peep’s World

Page 30: Interactivity in Exhibits

Peep’s World

Page 31: Interactivity in Exhibits

The Common

Page 32: Interactivity in Exhibits

The Common

Page 33: Interactivity in Exhibits

Children of Hangzhou

Page 34: Interactivity in Exhibits

Peep’s World

Page 35: Interactivity in Exhibits

7. Relevant

• Provides cognitive links to visitors’ existing knowledge and experience– Best achieved using Front-End evaluation– Confirmed using Prototyping

Page 36: Interactivity in Exhibits

Prototyping

Page 37: Interactivity in Exhibits

Prototyping

Page 38: Interactivity in Exhibits

Some Other Thoughts/Examples

Page 39: Interactivity in Exhibits

Costumes

Page 40: Interactivity in Exhibits

Computers for Keepsakes

Page 41: Interactivity in Exhibits

Photo Ops

Page 42: Interactivity in Exhibits

Integrated with Artifacts

Page 43: Interactivity in Exhibits

Integrated with Artifacts

Page 44: Interactivity in Exhibits

Integrated with Artifacts - Touch

Page 45: Interactivity in Exhibits

Integrated with Artifacts - Touch

Page 46: Interactivity in Exhibits

Integrated with Artifacts - Touch

Page 47: Interactivity in Exhibits

Feedback Incorporated in Exhibit

Page 48: Interactivity in Exhibits

Royal Museum of Scotland

Page 49: Interactivity in Exhibits

Thank You!

James Jensen

Curator of Exhibits

Waterloo Region Museum

[email protected]