Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident ...c4@87-intensity_of_the... ·...
Transcript of Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident ...c4@87-intensity_of_the... ·...
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects
Verica Erić1, Martina Göring2
1Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia2Jade University, Oldenburg, Germany
16. Oldenburger 3D Tage | 02. Februar 2017
Motivation
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring 2
Target at 90° (Imager 5010C)
Devi
atio
ns fr
om p
lane
(mm
)
X (mm)
Target at 90° (API Tracker 3)
Devi
atio
ns fr
om p
lane
(mm
)
X (mm)
range of deviations: [-4.0 mm, 3.4 mm]
range of deviations: [-0.6014 mm, 0.7237 mm]
white stripewhite stripe
Motivation
Laser scanning point cloud geometrical information - X, Y, Z coordinates radiometrical information - intensity (I)
Intensity values (Z+FLaserControl) 0 – 5.000.000 (absolute values – Z+F Imager 5010C) 0 - 1 and 0 - 255 (normalized values)
Mostly used for point cloud visualisation
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring 3
Motivation
Intensity values optical properties of surface hemispherical reflectance of surface from TLS data (Tan et al. 2016)
Application in the process of data estimation water surface mapping from ALS data (Höfle et al. 2007) for improving registration of point clouds (Böhm & Becker 2007) registering TLS data with digital camera images (Parmehr et al. 2014)
…
But the calibration of the obtained intensity values is needed! (Pfeifer et al. 2007, Kukko et al. 2008, Kaasalainen et al. 2009, Tan & Cheng 2016,…)
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring 4
What affects intensity?
Calibration of the intensity values instrumental effects surface characteristics surface reflectance scanning geometry incident angle atmoshperic effects laser light characteristics
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
Soudarissanane (2016)
5
Experiment
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
Z+F Imager 5010Cphase based, 1500 nm wavelength
beam divergence: < 0.3 mrad (full angle)beam diameter: approx. 3.5 mm (at 0.1 m)
Zenith LiteTM Diffuse Reflectance Target
Z+F Imager 5006iphase based, 785 nm wavelength
beam divergence: 0.22 mrad (full angle)beam diameter: 3 mm circular (at 1 m)
6
Experiment
Zenith LiteTM Diffuse Reflectance Target nearly ideal Lambertian, diffuse reflectance 4 stripes - each 5 cm x 20 cm effective spectral range: 260 – 2500 nm uniform BRDF over all angles
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
1500 nm (5010C)
785 nm (5006i)
white (95%) 94.660% 95.910%
light grey (50%) 41.307% 43.111%
dark grey (20%) 25.126% 23.409%
black (5%) 4.547% 4.350%
Spectral reflectance of the target (Calibration certificate, May 2015)
7
Experiment
Measurement setup location: Laboratory for optical 3D measurements, Jade University, Oldenburg 2 instruments set up next to one another
Z+F Imager 5010C – extremely high resolution Z+F Imager 5006i – super high resolution
target placed at approximately 10 m distance target at approx. 90°, 80°, 70°, 60° incident angle
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring 8
Data Processing
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
Manual selection of the target point clouds (acquired on whole target and on each stripe separately) exportedabsolute (original) intensity values (increments, 0 – 5.000.000)
SVD algorithm for best-fit plane for all target’spositions (whole target dataset) precisely estimated incident angle (normal vector = 90° incident angle)
Incident angle and surface reflectance effects on intensity values
9
Z+F LaserControl®
Incident Angle Effect
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
50% Reflectance
20% Reflectance
95% Reflectance
5% Reflectance
Z+F Imager 5010C
10
Incident Angle Effect
Strong dependence between intensity values and incident angle as incident angle decreases, intensity values for all stripes decrease
for Imager 5010C, values decreased for: 95% reflectance stripe – 23%
st. deviation - 19%
50% reflectance stripe – 20% st. deviation - 31%
20% reflectance stripe – 26% st. deviation - 36%
5% reflectance stripe – 31% st. deviation - 34%
distance to target ≈ 10 m
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
95% Reflectance StripeImager 5010C
Original Intensity Values (increments)
Prob
abili
ty D
ensit
y Fu
nctio
n
11
Strong dependence between intensity values and incident angle Imager 5010C – linear dependence between intensity values and incident angle for all stripes except
for 5% reflectance stripe
Incident Angle Effect
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
95% Reflectance Stripe (Imager 5010C)
Incident Angle
Orig
ina
Inte
nsity
Val
ues (
incr
emen
ts)
5% Reflectance Stripe (Imager 5010C)
Incident Angle
Orig
ina
Inte
nsity
Val
ues (
incr
emen
ts)
12
Incident Angle Effect
Strong dependence between intensity values and incident angle as incident angle decreases, intensity values for all stripes decrease
for Imager 5006i, values decreased for:
95% reflectance stripe – 22% st. deviation - 15%
50% reflectance stripe – 19% st. deviation - 32%
20% reflectance stripe – 24% st. deviation - 52%
5% reflectance stripe – 30% st. deviation - 4%
distance to target ≈ 10 m
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
95% Reflectance Stripe - Imager 5006i
Original Intensity Values (increments)
Prob
abili
ty D
ensit
y Fu
nctio
n
13
Strong dependence between intensity values and incident angle Imager 5006i – linear dependence between intensity values and incident angle for 95% and 50% but
not for for 20% and 5% reflectance stripes
Incident Angle Effect
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
95% Reflectance Stripe (Imager 5006i)
Incident Angle
Orig
ina
Inte
nsity
Val
ues (
incr
emen
ts)
5% Reflectance Stripe (Imager 5006i)
Incident Angle
Orig
ina
Inte
nsity
Val
ues (
incr
emen
ts)
14
How do surfaces of different reflectance affect intensity values?
For both TLSs and for all incident angles:
the higher the reflectance of surface is, the higher the intensity values are
the higher the intensity values are,the higher the standard deviations are
change in intensity values is not proportionalto the change in surface reflectance
lower intensity values can be measured more precisely
Surface Reflectance Effect
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
Z+F Imager 5010C (EHRNQ)
90° inc. angle 95% 50% 20% 5%No of points 18140 18300 18300 18300
Mean 2340582 1191041 793053 141786
St. dev. 34150 26325 24674 8642
Max - Min 216064 186880 82432 82432
Points out. ±σ 5749 5661 5793 4272
Z+F Imager 5006i (SHRNQ)No of points 732 732 732 732
Mean 924507 465672 275148 56001
St. dev. 13549 11560 7351 5121
Max - Min 87552 63488 53760 36764
Points out. ±σ 220 244 226 109
Intensity values analysis (in increments)
15
How do surfaces of different reflectance affect intensity values?
For both TLSs and for all incident angles:
the higher the reflectance of surface is, the higher the intensity values are
the higher the intensity values are,the higher the standard deviations are
change in intensity values is not proportionalto the change in surface reflectance
lower intensity values can be measured more precisely
Intensity Values by Stripes (90°, Imager 5010C)
Horizontal Angle (°)
Surface Reflectance Effect
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
Inte
nsity
Val
ues [
incr
emen
t]
16
Opposite effect of surface reflectance on measuring intensity values and positions of points lower surface relfectance more precise intensity values lower surface reflectance less precise measured positions of points
Surface Reflectance Effect
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring
Target at 90° (Imager 5010C)
Devi
atio
ns fr
om p
lane
(mm
)
X (mm)
5% reflectance stripe
95% reflectance stripe
Intensity Values by Stripes (90°, Imager 5010C)
Horizontal Angle (°)
Inte
nsity
Val
ues [
incr
emen
t]
5% reflectance stripe
95% reflectance stripe
17
Conclusion and Outlook
Calibration of the intensity values provided by TLS is needed
Incident angle and surface reflectance affect the intensity values as incident angle decreases, intensity values also decrease – the biggest drop is for 5%
reflectance stripe (31% for Imager 5010C, 30% for Imager 5006i)
the higher the surface reflectance is, the higher the intensity values are
lower intensity values can be measured more precisely
Opposite effect of surface reflectance on measuring intensity values and positions of points
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring 18
Conclusion and Outlook
Future steps: different calibrated target-TLS distances, same incident angle
different calibrated target-TLS distances, different incident angles
estimation of surface reflectance from obtained intensity data
…
Intensity of the Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data: Incident Angle and Surface Reflectance Effects | V. Erić & M. Göring 19
calibrated target
non-calibrated target
non-calibrated target
Baselines in Sandkrug
Thank you for your attention!
Verica Erić1: [email protected] Göring2: [email protected]
1Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Serbia2Jade University, Oldenburg, Germany