Universit e Paris-Saclay, 91767, Palaiseau, France. arXiv ...
Intense lasers: high peak power Part 2:...
Transcript of Intense lasers: high peak power Part 2:...
pageBrunoLeGarrec 1
Intense lasers: high peak powerPart 2: PropagationBrunoLeGarrec
DirecteurdesTechnologiesLasersduLULILULI/EcolePolytechnique,routedeSaclay
91128Palaiseaucedex,France
31/08/2016
LPA school Capri 2017
pageBrunoLeGarrec 2LPA school Capri 2017
Outline:
• Weneedhighpowerlasers:highenergyandhighrepetitionrate=highaveragepower
=>ButthekWlevellookslikeabarrier• Weneedhighqualitybeamsforfrequency
conversion,forpumpingTi-SapphireorforOPCPA
• Itissaidthatdiodepumplasersarehighlyefficientwhileflashlamppumpedlasersarenot.
• WhatdoweknowaboutkWclassdiode-pumpedsolidstatelasers(DPSSL)?
• Isthereany“oftheshelf”technology?
pageBrunoLeGarrec 3LPA school Capri 2017
Technicalspecification
Createalaserbeamthatcanbepropagatedandfocussed:• Lowdivergence(<<0.1mrad)• Highintensity(Power/beamarea>>GW/cm2)• Focusability tofewwavelengths• Monochromatic(Δλ/λ <<10-6)• Largebandwidth(Δλ/λ =¼)
Butgettingthesethreeparametersatthesametimeishighlychallenging:• Highestpossibleefficiency• Highbeamquality(closetoM2=1)• Highenergy/highpower(+highrepetitionrate=highaveragepower
/kilowattormultikilowattrange)
pageBrunoLeGarrec 4
Some data about high average power lasers
5
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Wal
l-plu
g ef
ficie
ncy
(%)
Power (W)
QCW
QCW
• Diode pumped lasers can be very efficient
• Examples can be found in Quantum Electronics39 (1) 1-17 (2009) when power > 100 W and optical to electrical efficiency can reach 23-24% (cooling is not taken into account)
• Most of these examples concerns CW lasers
• Two examples are high rep-rate QCW lasers (rep-rate > kHz), efficiency looks very good too (17-24%)
pageBrunoLeGarrec 5LPA school Capri 2017
Lookingatbothefficiencyandbeamquality
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 5 10 15 20 25
M2_xM2_y
Wall-plug efficiency (%)
M"s
quar
ed"
valu
e
QCW QCW
• None of these highly efficient lasers are suitable for frequency conversion because M2 > 10
• As soon as M2 > 4, it is quite impossible to have a good frequency conversion efficiency unless having intra-cavity frequency conversion
pageBrunoLeGarrec 6LPA school Capri 2017
Why ?
Ifwediscussthepossibilityofextendingsolid-statelasertechnologytohigh-average-powerandofimprovingtheefficiencyofsuchlasers,thecriticalelementsofthelaserdesignare:• thethermalmanagement(removingheatfromthecenterofthesolid
withacoolingsystemattheendsurfaces),• thethermalgradientcontrol(minimizingopticalwavefrontdistortions),• thepumpenergyutilization(overallefficiencyincludingabsorption,
storedenergy,gainetc),• theefficientextraction(fillingmostofthepumpedvolumewithextracting
radiationandmatchingpumpdurationtotheexcited-statelifetime).Doesitmakesensetooptimizealltheseparameters?Wecanwinaworldrecordinlaserextractionefficiencybutcanweachieveefficientsecond-harmonic-generationorhowmanytimesdiffractionlimitedisthelaserbeam?
Wavefront and light rays
Flat intensity and phase beam: • diffraction limited beam focused to
the diffraction limit according to the Airy disk pattern.
• The larger the size of the beam “a”, the smaller the focal spot.
• The shape of the focal spot is the square of the 1st order Bessel function: J1(z)/z.
If the beam is suffering distortions, then the wavefront is no longer a plane. Rays are perpendicular to the wavefront. A “ray” has a direction given by its “k” vector
Wavefront
« k » vectors
pageBrunoLeGarrec 8LPA school Capri 2017
Backtobasics=wavefrontdistortion
• AflatwavefrontbeamshouldgiveaperfectAirydiskpatternwhenfocused
• Adistortedwavefrontbeamcannotbefocusedtothatminimumsize
• InotherwordstheencircledenergyislowortheM2 ishigh
• M2 meansthatthebeamisM2 xDiffractionLimit
aλ
θ 22.1
=
a
Tache d ’AiryAiry disk
M2 x Airy disk
A real beam propagates like a perfect beamwhose intensity would be divided by M4 !
pageBrunoLeGarrec 9LPA school Capri 2017
Beam transportObject plane Image plane
Beam transport is possible withafocal optical systems
A pinhole is located at the focal plane
Spatial frequencies can be seenat the focal plane
pageBrunoLeGarrec 10LPA school Capri 2017
Beam transportObject plane Image plane
Image relay planes
Pinholes are relay imaged too
pageBrunoLeGarrec 11LPA school Capri 2017
Spatial Filter
f1 f2
L
( ) ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−−+−
−=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−=
22121
1
12 11
1101
101
1101
fLffLffLfL
fL
fM
Optical system is afocal when C=0 21 ffL +=
Beam size magnification=G 12 fGf =
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−
−=
GLG
M10
pageBrunoLeGarrec 12LPA school Capri 2017
Relay imaging
Stage 1 input Stage 2 output
f1 f2
L L1 L2
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−
−−=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−
−⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
GGLLG
GLGL
10/10101 22
GLL 2=
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−
−−=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
−
−
GLGLGL
GLG
10101
/1011
1LGL =
pageBrunoLeGarrec 13LPA school Capri 2017
Filtering is possible in the Fourier planeThe electromagnetic field in the focal plane of a lens can be
calculated in the framework of Fresnel diffraction.
Reduced variables are optical frequencies (X, Y) = (x, y)/λfPinhole size = half-angle of the pinhole as seen from the lens =
optical frequency θ = λ/pÀλ =1µm,θ =1mrad ó p=1mm
0000000 ),(2),()(2),( 22 dydxYyXxifExpyxAyxkikExpf
iYXA πλ ∫∫+=
A(x0,y0)
50 10
Spatial frequency
10020µrads
mm150
High frequenciesremoved by pinholes
Low frequenciesremoved by DFM
Frequencies that can growwith non linear Kerr effect (B)
= distance between actuators
pageBrunoLeGarrec 14LPA school Capri 2017
The Functions of Spatial Filtering
• Suppressing high spatial frequency modulations with a single pinhole
• Reducing ASE solid angle• Magnifying beam size• Imaging relay planes
pageBrunoLeGarrec 15
Energy balance in an optically pumped SSL*
Lamp input Power supply and circuit losses
Heat dissipated by lamp Power irradiated
Power absorbed bypumping cavity
Power absorbed byLaser rod
Power absorbed byCoolant and flowtubes
Reabsorptionby lamp
Heat dissipated by rod Stimulated emission Fluorescence output
Laser output Optical losses
External Power
100%
50% 50%
2% 0.6%
30% 8% 7% 5%
0.6%5% 2.6%
Lamp input 100%Heat dissipated by lamp 50%Power radiated (0,3 to 1,5 µm) 50%
Power absorbed byPump cavity 30 %Coolant and flowtubes 7%Lamp 5 %Laser rod 8%
Heat dissipated by rod 5%Fluorescence 0.4%Stimulated emission 2.6 %
Optical losses 0,6 %Laser output 2%
*From W. Koechner “Solid state laser engineering”NIF/LMJ are in the range 0.5 to 1 %
pageBrunoLeGarrec 16
Amplifying solid-state medium: Rod or slab
Optical resonator or cavity
Output laser beam
Pump(flash lamps, laser diodes )
Back to basics = laser physics
• During pumping, all that is not “in” the beam must be removed as heat otherwise it will induce wave front distortions of the output laser beam
pageBrunoLeGarrec 17LPA school Capri 2017
Thermalgradient:thermallensing
• Assumption:uniforminternalheatgenerationandcoolingalongthecylindricalsurfaceofaninfinitelylongrodleadstoaquadraticvariationoftherefractiveindexwithradiusr :n=n0-½n2r2
• Thisperturbationisequivalenttoasphericallensf’=2πr2K/(Padn/dT)withK thethermalconductivity,dn/dT thethermo-opticcoefficientand Pa theabsorbedpower.
• Temperature- andstress-dependantvariationoftherefractiveindex+thedistortionoftheend-facecurvaturemodifiesthefocallengthabout25%
Probe beam Focal point
pageBrunoLeGarrec 18LPA school Capri 2017
Thermalmanagement• Thermo-opticaldistortions
• K isthethermalconductivityanddn/dtthethermo-opticcoefficientandα thethermalexpansioncoefficient
• Figureofmerit=K/(dn/dt)• +Thermallyinducedbirefringence• Stressfracturerelatedtoshockparameter
• Figureofmerit=K/α• Wecancomparethebehaviourofdifferentlasermaterials
RS
ETpoisson therm cond T
therm ex young
=−( ) .
.
1 ν κ
α
wtdddP
Tcondtherm
cmw ,, with .
2/ 3
=∝Δκ
pageBrunoLeGarrec 19
Thermal management
How much power ? At 20% stress fracture : rod slab
b=0.2 RT
(W/cm)Pl
(W/cm)PV
(W/cm3)P (W)
for 100 cm3
glassLG750
0.43 2.2 1 100
SFAPSr5(PO4)3F
0.8 4 2.2 220
YLFLiYF4
1.8 9 4.3 430
YAG 8 40.2 19.2 1920
Al2O3 100 500 240 24000
P R b
P R bt
l rod T
V diskT
,
,
=
=
8
12 2
π
pageBrunoLeGarrec 20
Working at cryogenic temperature
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
100 150 200 250 300
Optical efficiency of diode-pumped 10% Yb-doped sesquioxides ceramics. Efficiency = laser output/diode output
Y2O3Lu2O3Sc2O3
Optic
al to
opt
ical e
fficien
cy (%
)
Temperature (K)
• G. Slack, D. Oliver, “Thermal conductivity of garnets and phonon scattering by rare-earth ions”, Phys. Rev. B, 4(2), p.592-609, 1971
pageBrunoLeGarrec 21LPA school Capri 2017
Thermalmanagement
IknowwhatIwanttodo:
Removeheatfromthe(centerofthe)solidwithacoolingsystem(attheendsurfaces)=>bettercooling
Minimizeopticaldistortions(wavefrontdistortion)=getaflatthermalgradient=>better“uniform”pumping
Increasethepumpingefficiency(absorption,storedenergy,gainetc)=>diodepumping
Increasetheextractionefficiency,fillingmostofthepumpedvolumewithextractingradiationandmatchingpumpdurationtotheexcited-statelifetime=>diodepumping
Doesitmakesensetooptimizealltheseelements?CanIachievesecondharmonicgenerationorhowmanytimes
diffractionlimitedismylaserbeam?
pageBrunoLeGarrec 22LPA school Capri 2017
Thermalgradientcontrol• Ifthegainprofileisflat(pump
uniformity)thenthethermalgradientwillbeflattoo
• InfactIonlycareofthetransversegradientbecausethebeamdon’t“see”theaxialone
• Manythinslabs(atBrewsteranglecanbeassociatedtodesignanamplifier)
pageBrunoLeGarrec 23
Cryogenic gas cooled multi-slab amplifier
Optica Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 438-439 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000438