Integrative energy planning of urban areas: Collective ... · This project has received funding...
Transcript of Integrative energy planning of urban areas: Collective ... · This project has received funding...
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649883.
Integrative energy planning ofurban areas: Collective learning forimproved governance
© Waltraud Schmid
The consortium at the site visit of Paris Clichy-Batignolles in May 2017.
2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXhhM0LJdGQ
Starting point
3
Strong population growth
Technological progress Liberalised EU energy markets
Decarbonisation
Civ
il So
ciet
y 1
.5C
pro
test
at
CO
P2
1. C
red
it:
Takv
er.
Need for integration of energy andurban (spatial) planning
4
How do we get there?
URBAN LEARNING: approach & elements
5
The backbone: A local working group for exchange andlearning (between departments, with utilities & other stakeholders)
In-depth analysis of the current urban planning processesand related framework conditions („governance“)
+ Instruments and tools in use+ Actors involved+ Low-carbon supply options available
Proposals for upgrading the planning processes andframeworks to better include energy aspects
Exchange between participating cities Sharing gained insights with other cities
The local working groups
6
Members of the Local Working Group Viennaon the picture: 5 Departments from 3 Administrative Groups
© M
. Cer
ven
y
Different designs. Minimum urban planning and energy departments.
7
Governance processes –Step 1: Analysis of current governance processes
Focus: urban planning process
Each partner analysed their urban planning processes and related framework
8
Governance processes –Step 2: Approaches for integrating energy
Each partner city developed an approach for integrating energy in urban planning
- When?- What?- By whom?
9
Governance processes –Step 3: Developing implementation plans
Each partner city suggested the next steps with a possible schedule
Main topics for all cities:• Data• Strategies + guidelines• Organisational framework
Learning from each other
10
Noch weitere fotos für- Study tours- Site visits- Twin sessions- Inner circle cities
Consortium meetings
Learning from each other
11
Site visits&
Study tours
General findings I
12
1. Cities need to lead in energy planning. Much more awareness is required about need for public energy planning competences (in cities+)
2. Framework conditions count immensely without a clear legal base for energy planning as such and as part of urban/spatial
planning the integration of energy and urban planning does not work a long-term decarbonisation strategy is a big supporter clear responsibilities + resources for energy planning at local level are key
3. Good understanding of planning processes and its framework is crucial but not trivial
4. There is no single way of doing, still a tuned system is needed.
5. There is a huge need for good data for legal justification and sound long-term (spatial) energy planning (GIS).
General findings II
6. The early phase is crucial for energy planning of urban areas.
7. The quarter level lacks responsible actors and instruments.
8. Qualities get lost throughout the planning process and performance monitoring is often not important but should be.
9. Energy as cross-sector topic needs interdepartmental collaboration within administrations• Local working groups as pioneers
10. Dialogue is key - between city and energy system operators, energy suppliers, developers and planners, … between cities
11. The “URBAN LEARNING approach” proved useful across cities, for larger and smaller ones.
High-level exchange of vice-mayors and planning directorsin Vienna in October 2017
© B
. Rau
sch
er
Implementation started
14
Discussing the findings of URBAN LEARNING with Vienna‘s Vice-Mayor Maria Vassilakou during Paris meeting in May 2017
© Waltraud Schmid
• alert for windows of opportunities from the very beginning First changes were implemented during the project duration
New working group with members fromcity and Vienna‘s utility
Common picture of planning process
Input for Thematic Concept on Integrated Energy Planning
Since:
• 2018: first (standard) competition for500 dwellings requiring fossil-freeenergy supply
• 2018: New building regulation enablesthe introduction of energy zones in 2018 and allowing energy efficiency asobjective of urban contracts
• 2019: work of 1st energy planningzones to be adopted 2019
• 2019/2020: work on digital heat atlason building level
Highlights from Vienna
15
Approach:
• Local working group worked on 4 concrete projects (2x Amsterdam and 2x Zaanstad)
Results:
• Energy planning added in processes of urban planning and using private law
• Pilot Hembrugterrein: energy neutral and without natural gas in urban contract/tender.
• Havenstad: Zoningplan new style + extra energy ambition in building permits
• City without natural gas (Strategy, Citydeal, Greendeal)
Amsterdam – ZaanstadThe Netherlands
16
E-map
E-map is an advanced electronic map system (currently beingexpanded) that works similarly to the Atlas of Amsterdam. This service contains many different maps of Warsaw. Each set consists of multiple layers with the ability to switch on and off individual layers.
Triggered by UL experience, maps will be added e.g. on conditions for solar renewable installations or on energy parameters/forecast for different areas.
17
Good practices from Warsaw
18https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eGeP4ZcBHg
Summary brochure
Detailed analyses of all cities
Good practice selection of instrumentsand tools
Toolbox
Videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcuWpINxvdUgN3wwbKVrl4g/videos
Further information
19
www.urbanlearning.eumailto: [email protected]
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649883.