Integrated management of Aflatoxins in groundnuts
-
Upload
ilri -
Category
Technology
-
view
358 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Integrated management of Aflatoxins in groundnuts
Integrated management of aflatoxins in groundnuts
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay, IITA-NigeriaFen Beed, IITA-TanzaniaPeter Cotty, USDA-ARS
Kola Masha, Doreo Partners
Breakout Session 4 on Food SecurityScience Forum 2013
Nutrition and health outcomes: targets for agricultural research, Bonn, Germany, 23‒25 September 2013
Elements of Integrated Management• Awareness – entire range of value chain actors• Advocacy – continental (PACA), regional, national, investors• Technology• Training – farmers, transporters, traders, regulators, consumers• Policies – standards, harmonization, trade• Institutions – regulators, markets, testing, private sector• Trade / Markets – food/feed processors, poultry/fish industry• Public good – home consumption; urban and rural markets;
WFP, HGSF
Agriculture Based Prevention of Aflatoxin-related Food Security and Health Effects
• Pre-harvest– Resistant cultivars, if available– Biological control, e.g., aflasafe– Irrigation and water conservation practices
• Post-harvest– Sorting– Insect control– Improved drying and storage– Food/feed processing methods– Alternative uses including blending
• Aflatoxin is a hidden problem• Chemical analysis required• Awareness is low• Long incubation for expression of health impacts• Regulations either non-existent or poorly enforced• Market does not usually discriminate• Demonstration of product value – health & income• Lack of biopesticide manufacturers• Too many components in integrated management
– some are not special for aflatoxin management
Risks / Challenges
Dr Akin Adesina
Policy Statement: Honourable Minister of Agriculture, Nigeria
“All parties involved, led by IITA and the government, have critical roles to ensure that Aflasafe treated food crops are successfully introduced into the market in the next 5 years”
Strategic Plan to Drive Sustainability Leverage Strong Regulatory Enforcement to Sustain Premium Market for Aflasafe maize
8
1Year
2 3 4 5
PACA and Pull MechanismGenerate Supply of Cost Effective Low
Aflatoxin Maize
Enforce Regulatory Policy
Enable Market Forces to Drive Sustainability
Promote Health Awareness to Value
Chain Actors
Policy: Build Regulators Capacity
Policy: Develop
regulatory framework
Policy: Phased in regulatory enforcement mechanism
Market Forces
Health Awareness: Farmer Focus
Health Awareness: Industry Focus
Health Awareness: End Consumer
1
2
3
4
Pilot Implementation• Value chain-centric: Farmers’
interest as the foundation of the action
• Action-oriented: Using practical methods to actively solve problems, not just talking about ideas, plans, or theories
• Innovation platform: problem solving through actors working regularly together to address issues and common challenges.
www.iita.orgA member of CGIAR consortium
Markets for Aflasafe
Doreo Partner analysis
Poultry industry
Export-oriented aggregators
Food processors
Large commercial farmers
Smallholder farmers
Market based
• Poultry feed
• Premium food market
AgResults (Incentive-cum-market based)
Growth Enhancement Scheme?
mar
ket
dem
and
fo
r A
flas
afe
• 60% maize consumed by farmers• 40% sold in the market
Innovation Platform• Platform meetings with
leadership and members of Poultry Association of Nigeria, feed manufacturers, maize aggregators, aflasafe farmers, vet professionals and regulators
• Poultry farmers to buy all aflasafe maize at a negotiated premium
• Agriculture ministry to fund NAFDAC to set up aflatoxin testing facilities in each state
www.iita.orgA member of CGIAR consortium
Willingness to Pay
www.iita.orgMycored Europe, 28 May, 2013A member of CGIAR consortium
$0 $3 - $6 $6 -$9 $9 - $12 $12 - $15 $15 - $19 $20 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100% 100%99%
83%
60%
25%19%
34% 31%
18%12%
5% 4%
Farmers who have used Aflasafe (n=246) Farmers who have not used Aflasafe (n=119)
Target Farm Gate Price Range
• All prior-users willing to pay; almost 50% non-users willing to pay• Prior-users willing to pay more than non-users Source: G. Okpachu & T. Abdoulaye
Farm gate price: $15.6/ha
www.iita.orgA member of CGIAR consortium
Aflasafe Plan & Plant
Capacity: 5 tons/hour
www.iita.orgA member of CGIAR consortium
Product TypesNational Products
Products ready for registration
Products under testing
Strain development in progress
Aflasafe-NigeriaTM
Aflasafe-SenegalTM
Aflasafe-KenyaTM etc…Aflasafe-WestTM
Aflasafe-EastTM
Aflasafe-SouthTM
Regional Products
SenegalMali
Burkina
Ghana
Nigeria
Kenya
Tanzania
Mozambique
Zambia
Likelihood of success
• Has the potential of reducing aflatoxin levels by up to 95% or more
• Biocontrol by itself can reduce toxin levels by more than 80%
• Other technical approaches can perform supportive functions
BUT• Success will be determined how well policy
and institutional frameworks are implemented
Partners• Who is, needs to be, involved to make this research get to
scale
Return on Investment• Nigeria and Senegal major groundnut exporters in
1960s. Compliance has economic incentives• Senegal:.• Increased export volume and price differential would
annually add $281 million value to groundnut export.• For confectionary groundnut, adherence to Good
Management Practices would increase export value by US$ 45 million annually.
• Best quality exported; poorer quality consumed domestically.
• Biocontrol: ROI – 5 to 25 times for cancer reduction. 167,000 DALYs could be saved.
• More work needed
World Bank; Mbaye (2004)
Peanut
Maize
Coffee
Cocoa
Groundnut Pyramids in Nigeria during 1960s
Pyramids in Egypt?
Punch Line• Impact of aflatoxins have several development dimensions:
– post-harvest losses, nutrition, health, crops, livestock, fish, trade, markets, policies, institutions and politics
• Reduction of aflatoxin will improve human health, increase farm income, improve profitability of animal industries, increase regional and international trade, and reputation of African products in global markets