INSULIN-PECTINATE NANOPARTICLES PREPARED BY IONOTROPIC GELATION AND COACERVATION METHODS

download INSULIN-PECTINATE NANOPARTICLES PREPARED BY IONOTROPIC GELATION AND COACERVATION METHODS

of 1

Transcript of INSULIN-PECTINATE NANOPARTICLES PREPARED BY IONOTROPIC GELATION AND COACERVATION METHODS

  • 7/30/2019 INSULIN-PECTINATE NANOPARTICLES PREPARED BY IONOTROPIC GELATION AND COACERVATION METHODS

    1/1

    INSULIN-PECTINATE NANOPARTICLES PREPARED BY IONOTROPIC GELATION AND

    COACERVATION METHODSMohd Mokhtar Mohammad Tarmizi, Syed Othman Syed Al-Azi, Sumiran Nurjaya, Tin Wui Wong*

    Particle Design Research Group,

    Non-Destructive Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy,

    Universiti Teknologi MARA, 42300 Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

    *[email protected]

    Fig. 1 Schematic representation of a) pectin-chitosan b) pectin-crosslinker (Ca2+ or Zn2+) interaction. [1]

    MATERIALS AND METHOD

    Materials

    Pectin (methoxy content=9.0%, galacturonic acid content=87.6%, Sigma Aldrich, USA)

    was employed as matrix polymer in the preparation of nanoparticles, with calcium

    chloride dihydrate (Merck, Germany) and zinc chloride (Merck, Germany) as crosslinker

    as well as chitosan (degree of deacetylation=86%, Zulat Pharmacy, Malaysia) as a

    coacervation agent. Other chemicals included hydrochloric acid, acetic acid and sodium

    hydroxide (Merck, Germany).

    Methods

    Preparation of Nanoparticles

    An aqueous solution containing 0.1 % (w/w) of pectin and 0.015 % (w/w) of insulin in 0.01

    M HCl was adjusted to pH 3.0 by using 0.5 M NaOH and introduced dropwise into an

    aqueous solution containing either 0.05 % (w/w) of calcium chloride dihydrate, 0.01875 %

    (w/w) of zinc chloride or 0.01 % (w/w) of chitosan in 0.1 % (v/v) acetic acid (Fig. 2). The

    bulk of the dispersion was subjected to magnetic stirring at 1000 rpm agitation. The

    formed insulin-pectinate nanoparticles were subjected to size and zeta potential analysis

    using dynamic light scattering and electrophoretic light scattering techniques respectively

    at 25C in triplicates (Malvern, UK). The insulin association efficiency, defined as the

    quotient of amount of encapsulated insulin to theoretical amount of insulin employed in

    the preparation of nanoparticles, in the unit of percentage was analyzed by means of high

    performance liquid chromatography (Agilent, USA).

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

    The negatively charged Ca2+ and Zn2+ crosslinked pectinate nanoparticles had smaller

    sizes of 348.0 12.9 and 376.0 76.0 nm respectively than the positively charged

    chitosan coacervated pectinate nanoparticles (896.0 90.0 nm). The pectinate

    nanoparticles demonstrated a high insulin association efficiency when Ca2+ and Zn2+

    were used as a crosslinking agents (> 60%), whereas chitosan-pectinate coacervate

    had a low insulin association efficiency (< 2%) (Table 1). The insulin association

    efficiency of pectinate nanoparticles was not directly correlated with the conductivity of

    crosslinking and coacervation agents, which presumably could govern the rate of

    nanoparticle formation and insulin encapsulation (Pearson correlation, r=0.077,

    p>0.05).Table 1: Profiles of size, zeta potential and association efficiency for insulin-pectinate nanoparticles

    and conductivity of crosslinker or coacervation agent.

    Fig. 3. SEM profiles for insulin-pectinate nanoparticulate films.

    CONCLUSION

    The difference in insulin association efficiency of nanoparticles was not ascribed to the

    variation of conductivity of crosslinking or coacervating agent. Low insulin association

    efficiency of chitosan coacervated pectinate nanoparticles was attributed to porous

    nature of coacervate which permitted insulin loss during the process of

    nanoparticulation. This was inferred from the larger physical size of coacervate which

    underwent a lower degree of densification. (Table 1; Fig. 3).

    Zinc Calcium Chitosan

    300x

    1000x

    2000x

    Pectin +insulin

    Association Efficiency by HighPerformance

    Liquid Chromatography

    Scanning ElectronMicroscopy

    Drying of dispersioninto film at 4C

    Size and zeta potentialmeasurement

    Filtration

    Conductivitymeasurement

    Extrusion

    Dispersion transferredto petri dish

    Crosslinking orcoacervatingagent

    Redispersion

    In Association With

    PARTICLE DESIGN RESEARCH

    GROUP

    UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI

    MARA

    NON-DESTRUCTIVE

    BIOMEDICAL

    AND PHARMACEUTICAL

    RESEARCH CENTRE

    INTRODUCTION

    Nanoparticles are nano-sized particles that are made up of a shell and a space specifically formulated to carry drugs. The formation of nanoparticles can be achieved by several

    techniques namely ionotropic gelation, coacervation and others. Frequently, nanoparticles are fabricated using polysaccharides. Natural polysaccharides, such as pectin and

    alginate, are widely employed in the preparation of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms due to their non-toxic, biodegradable, biocompatible and hydrophilic characteristics [1-3].

    Nanoparticles, with sizes ranging between 10-1000 nm, can protect the protein drugs against enzymatic and hydrolytic degradation as well as control their release patterns in the

    gastrointestinal tract. Insulin as a type of protein drug is susceptible to degradation by proteolysis activity of the gastrointestinal tract [4]. In the present study, insulin-pectinate

    nanoparticles have been prepared by ionotropic gelation and coacervation process using calcium chloride and zinc chloride as crosslinking agents and chitosan as coacervation

    agent (Fig. 1). The formed nanoparticles were subjected to size, zeta potential, insulin association efficiency and scanning electron microscopy analysis. The reactivity of

    crosslinking and coacervation agents in liquid phase was illustrated by their conductivity values.

    a) b)

    Crosslinkers Size (nm) Zeta potential(mV)

    Associationefficiency (%)

    Conductivity(S/cm)

    Calcium348.0 12.9 -17.9 0.8

    69.8 7.1 755.7 0.6

    Zinc376.0 76.0 -18.5 1.1 60.5 9.5 315.0 2.6

    Chitosan 896.0 90.0 64.9 6.5 1.7 0.0 554.0 3.0

    REFERENCES

    [1] Silpakorn University International Journal, Vol. 3 pp. 206-228,

    (Number 1-2) 2003.

    [2] Carbohydrate Polymers., vol. 62, pp. 245-257, 2005.

    [3] Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., vol. 69, pp. 176188, 2008.

    4 Dru Dev.Ind. Pharm. 30359-367.

    Fig. 2: Workflow of nanoparticles and nanoparticulate films preparation

    Preparation of film from nanoparticulate dispersion

    The same dispersion was subjected to drying at 4C in petri dish. The formed film was

    collected and subjected to Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, Jeol,

    Japan) analysis.