Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka Director of the...
-
Upload
mohammed-monday -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka Director of the...
Instruments supporting Instruments supporting effectiveness of the effectiveness of the
Cohesion PolicyCohesion Policy
Karina BedrunkaKarina BedrunkaDirector of the Department for Coordination of Operational Director of the Department for Coordination of Operational
ProgrammesProgrammes
Gdańsk,Gdańsk, JulyJuly 7 7thth 2011 2011
I. National performance reserve
II. Cohesion policy after 2013 – focus on results
Scope of the presentation
I. National performance reserve
Results of national performance reserve – Opolskie voivodeship (2008-2010)
46 % - level of certification to EC
99 % - level of contracting
42 % - level of EFRD payments
EUR 58,027,035 in EUR
National performance
reserve
Technical adjustment
Flood Total
54,156,945 3,870,090 6,275,125 64,302,160
Allocation for ROP OV 2007-2013: EUR 491,446,973
Additional funds for Opolskie voivodeship
1st PLACE IN POLAND – SUCCESS OF OPOLSKIE REGION
15% with regard to the original ROP OV 2007-2013 allocation
Opolskie success factors
Direct contact of public administration staff with beneficiaries at the stage of project development and financial settlement in the form of:
individual consultation training sessions/workshops
Project promoter at the stage of project submission, approval and financial settlement
Meetings of the Marshal of the Opolskie Voivodeship with businesses – introduction of simplifications
Raising public administration's and businesses' awareness of joint goals and objectives
Opolskie success factors, cont.
Promotion of ROP OV 2007-2013 – the Board of the Opolskie Voivodeship was recognized as the most trusted of all in Poland by the Ministry of Regional Development
On-going financial and substantive monitoring of the Programme by the ROP OV 2007-2013 Managing Authority
Major commitment of the Board of the Opolskie Voivodeship to the implementation of ROP OV 2007-2013
Responsiveness to legislative changes (Team for environment protection)
Qualifications
Motivation
Commitment
Opolskie success factors, cont.
Wisdom depends on three elements: personality, knowledge and self-control
Antiphanes
These three virtues create outstanding individuals who are capable of doing great things around them.
Opolskie success factors, cont.
Official gala to summarize the results of the contest for the National Performance Reserve under ROP OV 2007-2013 and Human Capital OP in the Opolskie Voivodeship
Opole, February 25th 2011
II. Cohesion policy after 2013 – focus on results
Financial perspective2004-2006
Financial perspective2007-2013
Financial perspective2014-2020
•Little experience in programming indicators at the national and regional level
Excessively developed system, e.g. too many indicators
Under/over-estimated indicators
Imprecise indicator definitions
System of indicators – experience
90 programme-specific indicators:24 quantitative indicators66 qualitative indicators
Monitoring of indicator achievement in time: monthly cycle based on contracts signed and payment claims
System of indicators for ROP OV 2007-2013
YEAREvaluation studies/Analyses of Managing Authority
of ROP OV 2007-2013
2010 Evaluation of projects' quality and their impact on efficient
implementation of ROP OV 2007-2013 objectives, including identification of areas in need of further support
2011
Evaluation and analysis of undertakings aimed at setting up new businesses in the Opolskie voivodeship (including analysis of the quality of jobs created)
Analysis of ICT development in the Opolskie voivodeship
Road construction investments financed with ROP OV 2007-2013
2012 Evaluation of efficiency of implementation of financial
engineering instruments within and outside the JEREMIE initiative
Evaluation of ROP OV 2007-2013 implementation
Evaluation of ROP OV 2007-2013 implementation, cont.
Annual, periodic
report from the
implementation of the
programme
Evolution of the European
Commission / country / region's
approach from quantitative to
qualitative
OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES
FOR MEASURES
Indicators concerning individual measures
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
Indicators declared by beneficiary
• closed list of obligatory indicators (e.g. 3-4 indicators)
• indicators specified at the beginning of the programming period
• consistently defined indicators
KEY TANGIBLEOBJECTIVE
Indicators, e.g.
• change in GDP (%)
• number of jobs created
TANGIBLE STRATEGIC
OBJECTIVESreflecting Priority
Axes
Several indicators for each objective
Homogeneous priority axes
covering max. 3 areas
Programming objectives for 2014-2020 – interconnection with indicators
Calls for proposals 2014-2020
ALLOCATION
Project selection procedure
Calls for proposals 2007-2013
COMPETITION
COMPETITION ALLOCATIONRESULT TO BE ACHIEVED
WITH REGARD TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
TOOL
project evaluation closely related with indicators
Financial perspective2007-2013
Financial perspective2014-2020
CRITERIA:
I. Evaluation of results achieved under specific strategic objectives
(FUNDS SPENT VS. RESULTS OBTAINED)
II. Payments to beneficiaries (50%)
National performance reserve? YES
CRITERIA:
I. Contracting (50%)
II. Payments to beneficiaries (50%)
Raising strategic approach awareness among the Managing Authority and the beneficiaries concerning:
increased role of indicators from the very beginning of the programming period
specification of permissible deviations in the non-performance of strategic objective-related indicators (e.g. failure to achieve at least 50% of indicators results in financial adjustments)
MARKETING AT THE LEVEL OF THE EC / COUNTRY / REGION
Proposals for implementation in the financial perspective 2014-2020
Concentration of funds on identified growth potentials
Focus on the achievement of tangible objectives of operational programmes
Specification of the criteria for the national performance reserve at the beginning of the programming period
STRATEGIC PROGRAMMING
Proposals for implementation in the financial perspective 2014-2020, cont.
Support areas limited to the Europe 2020 Strategy
Limited number of project types
Indicators linked with project assessment – rejection of projects due to the fact that they do not meet the criterion linked with indicators at the level of strategic objective
HORIZONTAL GUIDELINES AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL - CONTINUATION
Thank you for your attention