Institutionalizing Communication Standards with Limited English Proficient Populations Sara Chute,...
-
Upload
jeffery-griffin -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Institutionalizing Communication Standards with Limited English Proficient Populations Sara Chute,...
Institutionalizing Communication Standards with Limited English Proficient Populations
Sara Chute, MPP, International Health CoordinatorAlexa Horwart, Graduate Fellow
Minnesota Department of Health
Overview
• Background/Need for project• Promising practices at MDH• Institutionalizing the model• Challenges and Lessons learned • Next steps
Setting
• Decentralized public health infrastructure– 87 counties– 10 tribal health jurisdictions
• Eight public health regions• Statewide videoconferencing capacity • Multi-cultural communication venues exist
71
Distribution of Foreign-Born Populations by Region of Origin, U.S. and MN 2010
Asia32%
Africa5%
Latin America
60%
Other3%
Asia41%
Africa22%
Latin America
31%
Other6%
United States
N = 38.52 million (12.5%)
Minnesota
N = 357,561 (6.8%)
Source: Migration Policy Institute, Minnesota Fact Sheet
Refugee Arrivals to MN by Region of World 1979-2012
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
800019
79
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Nu
mb
er
of
arr
iva
ls
Southeast Asia Sub-Saharan Africa Eastern EuropeFSU Middle East/North Africa Other
Refugee Health Program, Minnesota Department of Health
Primary Refugee Arrivals, Minnesota2012
N=2,264
Refugee Health Program, Minnesota Department of Health
“Other” includes Belarus, Cameroon, China, DR Congo, Cuba, Eritrea, Guatemala, Indonesia, Iran, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Laos/Hmong, Liberia, Mexico, Moldova, Nepal, Russia, Sudan, Tanzania, and Ukraine
Foreign-Born Population Minnesota, 2011
W. Africa1.5%
Thailand3.0%
Ecuador1.6%E. Africa
11.0%
Mexico 17.4%
Canada3.5%
China3.5%
Korea3.5%
Vietnam 4.7%
India5.5%
Laos7.7%
Others34.3%
Europe13.8%
In 1960, more than 50% of of foreign-born Minnesotans were from Europe. In 2008, just 13.8% of foreign-born Minnesotans were from Europe.
Source: 2011 ACS
Key Assumptions
• Health disparities exist • LEP populations are at risk• Communication barriers such as language,
trust, culture, and low literacy levels exist• There are champions of work in this area and
best practices across MN and the USA
Project seeks to address:
•How do LEP groups learn about health issues?
•How to break thru barriers like language/culture?
•What are creative ways to deliver health messages?
Project Background and Need
• H1N1• Accreditation• Demand within MDH
Examples of Promising PracticesLocal Media and Health Promotion
Lessons learned from H1N1
• Created during H1N1 to aid in prioritizing communities for audio/written/video translation
• Potential use beyond emergency preparedness
Language Prioritization Grid
Example: Minnesota’s Grid created during H1N1
Lesson learned: MDH needs more than a static grid and ‘top 10 list’
Hence project was born
Examples of Data Sources used
• Census 2010– American Community Survey 5, 3, and 1 year estimates
• Minnesota Department of Education– Student Survey
• Minnesota Department of Health– Refugee Health Program data– Birth Registry data
• Minnesota State Demographic Center
LEP Communication NeedsExamples: Hmong, Somali and Karen communities
Lesson learned: one ‘health literacy’ size does not fit all
Demand within the departmentimplementing federal and state grants
conducting research projectsdisease outbreak calls/investigations
emerging health issues
Often includes:• Health education• Promotion activities• Resources
MEASLESBED BUGS
Skin-lightening Creams
AUTISM
RHP works with refugee communities to develop
appropriate response
Goal: To create healthier, happier refugee
communities and help promote healthier
lifestyles.
HEALTH ISSUE EMERGES
Promising Practices ContinuedCommunity-Led Health Education
Institutionalizing the modelthroughout the departmentWhat elements are needed?
Element #1: Develop Sustainable Framework
Evolution of statewide gridLessons learned: Evaluation of key data indicators is criticalGraduate students are key to success with limited $/staff
• County demographic “mini-reports” or dashboards• LEP group demographic “mini-reports”• Larger city demographic “mini-reports”• Community survey creation and analysis• MDH survey creation and analysis• MDH case studies creation• Community conversations• MDH stakeholder conversations• User Guide for MDH staff
Element #2: Creating a Shared Space
Online ‘intranet/web’ resource hub Lesson learned: Need communications support early on• How to identify LEP populations• How to gain a deeper understanding of LEP groups• Available resources for reaching LEP groups
– Existing materials– MDH champions– Community outreach
• How to implement your idea (tools and templates)
Online Tool: MDH Intranet Page
Identifying LEP communities
Gaining deeper understanding
• LEP group backgrounders• List of organizations representing communities• List of trusted messengers by group*• Effective format information by group*
Lesson learned: It’s easy to create beautiful workplans and project documents, but the reality is that compiling this information will take longer than your Phase I, II or 3
* This information will come from community surveys, community conversations, and past focus groups
No need to reinvent the wheel!
• Identify existing materials– Refugee Health Information Network– Healthy Roads Media– MDH (existing fact sheets, videos, etc.)– Health Exchange
• Look to MDH Champions• Links to national ‘best’ practices for how to co-
create and collaborate directly with LEP groups• Listen to Community Advisors
Element #3: Gain Internal Support from Leadership, Managers and Staff
Work across silos!Partners and advisors at MDH
• Refugee Health Program• LEP Communications workgroup• Health Communicators workgroup• Public Health Infrastructure Initiative• Center for Health Promotion• Office of Minority and Multicultural Health• Office of Emergency Preparedness• Office of Performance Improvement• Office of Health Statistics• Communications
Lesson learned: need to integrate into existing workgroups rather than start from scratch
Example: In 2012, MDH commissioner called for a new Public Health Infrastructure Initiative, with cross-divisional representation whose charter included eliminating health disparities and achieving health equity
In 2013 a Health Equity workgroup was created out of this, with key objectives including :
-define key disparity terminology -set performance baselines for MDH programs-collection of race, language, ethnicity data-trainings for staff (on racism, social determinants of health, etc.)
• Meets monthly to keep work moving forward*** Health Literacy Project***
Health Equity efforts
LEP Health Communicators Workgroup
• In Fall 2012, a 12-person workgroup from the MDH health communicators group was created to work together on improving communications projects with LEP and low-literacy communities.
• Meets monthly to discuss potential projects and to work on creating an intranet site where resources can be shared.
• Cross-divisional representation
Element #4: Create Mechanism for Ongoing Evaluation & Continuous Improvement
Example: MDH Survey (Dec 2012)63 total participants• 82% had been a part of a
communications/outreach project with LEP/low literacy communities
• Top communities served: Hmong, Spanish-speaking (Hispanic and Latino), Somali, African American
MDH Budgets and Timelines
$ 0-999 $ 1,000-4,999
$ 5,000-9,999
$ 10,000-24,999
$ 25,000- 49,999
Over $ 50,000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Budget
Less than 3 months
3-6 months 7-11 months 1-2 years more than 2 years
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Timeline
MDH Projects involving translation
78%
14%
8%
yes
No
I don’t know
Take home message: You are not alone! Main challenges
• Working with community partners• Navigating the translation process• Understanding and bridging cultural barriers• Finding time/managing time• Lack of internal support within section or program• Lack of internal communication/resources at MDH• Budget• Tailoring messages to specific communities• Evaluation• Knowing who to communicate to
– demographic information for the state or specific regions
Element #5: Seek Community Involvement and Feedback on a regular basis
Examples of potential partners/advisors: • Community based organizations• Diverse community media • Community health coalitions
Example: Community survey (Dec 2012)
Purpose: How do communities access health information? How can MDH more effectively community with LEP/low-literacy communities?
• Total of 253 participants from community based organizations and diverse community media
Community themes identified in survey
• Trust– insiders, long-term relationships, building capacity, history of mistrust
• Accessibility-- language, convenience, culturally appropriate
• Cultural relevance/cultural responsiveness• Importance of ‘bridgers’ and navigators
Community survey quotesQ: What factors lead to choosing particular health
information sources?
“If these information remain at MDH, no community will go to MDH and pick up the information by themselves and would probably not know what types of information is important that resonate to them since MDH is housed with tons of health information.”
“When you don't know any thing about your new home, the only people you can trust is your community, your family & friends.”
“Latino communities are not likely to turn to printed forms of information to get information on resources. Latinos are likely to get information orally and via radio. Also should printed information be available, it should be culturally and contextually appropriate for each respective large group. Venezuelan folks related differently to government and "its services" than do Mexican folks and Puerto Rican folks. A cookie-cutter approach to outreach will not be effective nor efficient when working with Latino populations.”
“These new refugees need people who cannot only interpret information for them, but help explain the nuances and the systems, that can help them navigate these various systems, their paperwork, expectations, know what questions to ask, help them to know their rights and their responsibilities. Community leaders, community organizations and family tend to be the most trusted and give the most time to actually walk people through these processes and systems.”
Next steps• World Café style conversations with MDH staff and
community advisors (Spring 2013)
• Present project and key recommendations/findings thus far to leadership and staff
• Skeleton of website/intranet (Summer 2013)
• Compile and upload LEP Data and Profile Information Framework onto intranet webpage for Metro area and largest ‘rural’ counties (Summer/Fall 2013)– using user guide and in-kind graduate student support
Next steps continued
• Launch ongoing trainings for MDH staff (Fall 2013)– Translation (policies, finding a translator, tips for using a translator, etc.)– Working with community partners
• Key Lesson – Funding is needed for LEP communications position to continue/sustain this work (ongoing)
• Integrate LEP projects into program workplans and budgets across the department– Finalize templates and protocols
• Continue to highlight and build directory of MDH Champions
Contact info:Minnesota Department of HealthEmail: [email protected]: 651 201 5543Website: www.health.state.mn.us/refugee