Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics H. Kamoun, G. Lamanna, B. Weigand Institute of Aerospace...
-
Upload
peter-wilkerson -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics H. Kamoun, G. Lamanna, B. Weigand Institute of Aerospace...
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
H. Kamoun , G. Lamanna, B. WeigandInstitute of Aerospace Thermodynamics, Universität Stuttgart
70569 Stuttgart Germany
J. SteelantESTEC-ESA, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Thermal characterisation of an ethanol flashing jet using
differential infrared thermography
Eucass 2011, St Petersburg
2
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
3
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
4
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Motivation & Objectives
Flashing: Sudden exposure of a superheated pressurized liquid to a low pressure environment Fast phase transition
Relevant in many technical application Accidental release of flammable and toxic pressure-liquefied gases in
nuclear and chemical industry. Benefit in propulsion system enhanced atomisation
P
T
Pinj
Psat(Tinj)
P∞
Tsat(P∞) Tinj
Liquid
VaporRp
ΔT
5
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Motivation & Objectives
Flash-atomisation/vaporisation model Temperature data for validation
Non-intrusive methods are needed
New method Differential Infrared Thermography (DIT)
6
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
7
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Differential Infrared Thermography
Problem: Spray emissivity: ε unknown For a liquid or a gas ε = f (T, λ, density)
DIT
8
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Differential Thermography
1,1 1 BackgroundSpraybSpraySprayCam III
2,2 1 BackgroundSpraybSpraySprayCam III
12
121BackgroundBackground
CamCamSpray II
II
-
Liquid: ethanol, Tinj = 389K, pam = 0.2bar, pinj = 10bar
TBack = 286 K TBack = 366 K
9
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
10
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Experimental Setup
High-pressure liquid supply system
Liquid tank
Optical setup
Vacuum chamber
Vacuum Pump
11
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Experimental Setup
Heated modified diesel injector with D=150 μm and L/D= 6.6 Short injection and transient times → Constant backpressure Constant injection conditions (i.e. pressure & temperature) Reproducible test conditions
Courtesy of Bosch GmbH
12
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Experimental Setup
Heated background
Cooled background
303 K<TBack <389 K
280 K<TBack <290 K
13
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Differential Infrared Thermography
14
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
IR Kamera
Resolution: 640x512 pixel
Detector: InSb
Detector cooling: Stirling Cooler
Spectral range: 1.5 - 5µm
Integrationmode: Snapshot
Calibration range: 5°C – 300°C
FLIR Orion SC7000 Series
15
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
16
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Uncertainty analysis
The choice of the background temperatures
If Ispray < IBackground1,2 and for the spray dilute region (εspray<<1)
A calculation of the spray temperature is impossible
Key point: the selection of the background temperature should enhance the contrast between spray and surroundings
1,1 1 BackgroundSpraybSpraySprayCam III
2,2 1 BackgroundSpraybSpraySprayCam III
11 1 BackgroundsprayCam II
22 1 BackgroundsprayCam II
17
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Uncertainty analysis
4/1
42
41
42
41
42
41
41
42
414
1
1
BackBack
CamCam
BackBack
BackCamCamCam
spray
TT
TT
TTTTT
T
T
The sensitivity to measurement errors in e.g. the temperature recorded by the infrared camera TCam1
For a given Tspray and Tback1,2 ,the temperature recorded by the camera and the spray temperature error can be computed as a function of εspray
1Cam
spray
dT
dT
18
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Uncertainty analysis
1,1 1 BackgroundSpraybSpraySprayCam III
Liquid: ethanol, Tinj = 389K, pam = 0.2bar, pinj = 10bar
The best results are obtained when the spray temperature distribution is intermediate between the two background values
19
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Uncertainty analysis
Tback1=286 K, Tback1=366 K
Max error: 4K
Tback1=337K, Tback1=366 K
Max error: 25K
20
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Uncertainty analysis (Outlook)
Influence of multiple scattering inside the spray:
Neglecting infrared scattering may lead to an overestimation of the emitted spray radiation
Further investigation are needed to evaluate this effect on the temperature results
Comparison of the temperature results with Global Rainbow Thermometry data to validate the assumption made here.
21
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
22
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Results (Validation)
Liquid: ethanol, Tinj = 403K, pam = 1 bar, pinj = 10bar
the window does not affect the temperature results
good agreement with the temperature measured by the thermocouples
Despite the good agreement a validation of the DIT can be accomplished only upon comparison with other non-
intrusive thermographic technique (e.g. GRT)
estimation of infrared scattering from a cloud of finely atomised droplets.
23
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Results
r
x
Example of flash a atomising spray. Liquid: Ethanol, Tinj = 389 K, pam = 0.2 bar,
p inj = 10 barNear the nozzle exit: narrow temperature profile
Downstream: flatter temperature profileRapidly decay of the temperature downstream the nozzle
24
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Results (Axial Profile)
Liquid: ethanol, Tinj = 342 K, pinj = 10bar
am
injsatp p
TpR
)(
Superheating Rp ↑ → Cooling rate ↑
25
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Contents
Motivation & Objectives
Differential Infrared Thermography
Experimental Setup
Uncertainty analysis
Results
Summary
26
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Summary and Outlook
The potential of the differential infrared thermography (DIT) for the characterisation of the temperature evolution in am flashing jet has been explored
Experiments were carried out under vacuum condition employing ethanol as test fluid.
The best results are obtained when the spray temperature is intermediate between the two background values
The temperature showed a decay along the spray centreline
With increasing superheat level, the cooling rate increases
Results with a good agreement with the thermocouple measurement.
Outlookfurther investigation are needed to evaluate the effect of radiative, infrared scattering on the temperature measurement
27
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Thank You
28
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
29
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Backup
30
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Experimental Setup
Requirements: Reproducible test conditions
• P∞: from 0.02 bar to 0.4 bar
• T∞=20°C
• Tinj: from 35 °C to 140°C
• Pinj= 10 bar
Good Vacuum (P∞=390 Pa)
Possibility to vary independently injection pressure and temperature
Problem: Maintaining a constant
backpressure
Solution: Fast response injection
31
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Injector
Requirements: Short injection and transient times → Constant backpressure Constant injection conditions (i.e. pressure & temperature) Reproducible test conditions
heated, modified diesel injector
Courtesy of Bosch GmbH
32
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Results (Axial Profile)
Liquid: ethanol, pam = 0.1 bar, pinj = 10bar
33
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Results (Axial Profile)
Liquid: ethanol, Tinj = 389 K, pinj = 10bar
34
Institute of Aerospace Thermodynamics
Vacuum Chamber
Water cooling → to prevent temperature gradients in the test chamber
Chamber temperature controlled through 3 thermocouples