Innovation Monetization By Matthew Kroeger and Cheryl Kysh.

14
Innovation Monetization By Matthew Kroeger and Cheryl Kysh

Transcript of Innovation Monetization By Matthew Kroeger and Cheryl Kysh.

Innovation MonetizationBy Matthew Kroeger and Cheryl Kysh

Innovation Monetization

• Financial leveraging of intellectual assets

• Increase either:• 1. Revenue streams• 2.Capital funding

Emphasis on patents.

Patent law

• Title 35 of the US code issued by the (USPTO)

• Patents issued to inventors/discoverers of a process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or improvement (paraphrase)

• Once issued, patents are personal property that can be bought, sold, transferred or assigned

• Infringement is the making, using, offering to sell, selling, or importing a patented invention without authorization and is subject to civil remedies.

Historical Perspective

• Historical methods for patent monetization:• Licensing• Enforcing patent rights and licensing

agreements

• However, patent holders have since devised new techniques:• Sale of patents• Middle men• Securitization

Licensing

• Common form of patent monetization• Example: Microsoft’s patent license with

Samsung for use of Android Software

• Risks include competition, obsolesce, or expiration• Example:

Obsolesce of floppy disks

and zip disks

Multi-Company Licensing

• Patent Pool and Cross-licensing

• Result of two companies with similar innovations, or inventions

that rely heavily on each other

• Negotiated in order to avoid litigation

Texas instruments

• First example of a patent holder taking a defensive position with regards to their patent licensing agreements- early 1990’s

• Used a litigation strategy to ensure that licenses were renewed- or else the licensors could face a patent infringement suit

• Forced royalties out of companies using TI’s innovation without authorization.

• (No innovation without authorization)

Changing Perspective

• IP monetization into important part of strategic management processes.

• Five changes for change:• 1. Utilizing the large, untapped potential of IT• 2. More expertise in structuring and executing IP

strategies• 3. Identification of IP suitable for financial

engineering• 4. Rise of non-practicing entities• 5. Avoidance of litigation risk

MiddleMen

• IP Aggregators• Acquire patents and patent pools• Provide capital• Provide financing

• Defensive Patent Pools• Offer protection for “high risk” patents

• Non-practicing Entities, aka The Patent Trolls• Big topic in current news• Very controversial

Patent Trolls

Patent trolls

• Do not create, provide, or innovate products or services (NPE)

• Buy patents and patent portfolios

• Receive revenues primarily through litigation, and threats of litigation

• Critics:• Exist only to sue others• Don’t use patents, or participate in innovation• Stifle innovation• “[Patent trolls] don’t produce anything, they just shake

down anyone who does”

False Marketing

• It is illegal to mark a product as “patented” if it is not

• Fines up to $500

• Does not apply for expired patents

Patent Management

• As monetization options have increased, so has the complexities of patent management.

• Integrate strategies for individual patents as well as in conjunction with each other.

• Keep future innovation in mind in addition to current monetization strategies

• Include patents and innovation as part of an overall business model

Concluding Remarks

• The environment, and therefore the options, for patent

monetization has changed

drastically.

• More options than ever

• Some companies use their patents for good,

some for evil