Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal...

4
NONV AR ICEAL HEMORRHAGE Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding PAUL KORTAN, MD, FRCPC ABSTRACT: Gastrointestinal hemor rhage is a common and serious problem - its average mo rtality of 1 0% has changed little over the past 40 years. In 80% of patients the bleeding stops spo ntaneously. In patients with continu ous or recur- re nt bl eedmg (20%), mo rtality and morbidity are high, a nd emergency surgery is often required, which has a high er mo rtality than the same ope ration perf ormed el ectively. Succes.sful therapeutic end oscopic mt erve nuon in this h ig h nsk group is necessary to improve o utcome. For inj ec tion treat me nt of nonvariceal bleeding lesion s, the author has bee n usmg th e Soehendra me th od (l : I 0, 000 adrenaline a nd poltdoca nol) with success m 90 1 '10 of actively bleeding patie nts. T h ree controllt·d trials of end oscopic sclerosis in bl eeding pept ic ulcer disease showed decreased bl ood transfusion s, surgery a nd hospital stay, but did n ot fi nd any sign ifi cant differen ce m morta li ty. The i dea l solution and the usef ulness of additional therapy are questions which mu st be addressed v ia prospec tive con- trolled trialsofa large numberof pat ie nts. CanJ Gastroenterol 1990;4(9):650- 652 Key Wo rds: Adrenalin e, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Hemostasis, Inj ection chera/ JY Traitement par injection des hemorragies gastrointestinales non variqueus.es RESU ME: L'hemorrag1e gastro-incestmale est un probleme courant serieux qu i s'accompagne d' une morra lice moyenn e de 10 %, chiffre qui a peu change au cours des quarante dernieres annees. Chez 80 % des patients, l'hemorragie cesse spontanement. Chez Jes pat i ents qui saignent consrnmment ou do ne les sa 1gne- ments recidivent (20 %), la mortalite et la morbidite sont elevces et une inte rvention d'urgence s'impose souvent, laque ll e est assort1e <l' un taux de mo rta li te supcrieure a ce lle des memes operat ions a froid. Da ns cc groupe a ri sque el eve, ii est n ccessa ire de r ecou rir aux in t erve nti ons en doscop iques therape uttqucs afin d'ame liorcr les resultats. L'auteur a recours au tra1tement par inject i on des lesions non variqueuses qui saigne nt ; ii utilise la me thode de Soe hendra (1: IO 000 adrenaline et po li docanol) avec succes chez 90 % des pat i ents qui sai gnent acttvemcnt. Trois essais controles unit s.mt des injections sclerosa ntes effectuees sous endoscopic dans le tra itement des ulceres gastro- duode naux hemorragiques rappo rtent une diminut i on des transfusions, des gestes D1111swn of Gas t roent erolo,a, Universi ty of Tcmmw, T he WI ell esl ey / los p, ral, Toronw, Onrano Corresponden ce and reprmrs. Dr P Korum , Assrsran r P rofessm, Dit•1s1cm of Gastroenwrol oJ:Y, Univers ity of Toronto, The Wlellesle"I I lo sp1 tal, 1 60 Wlellesley Street Ea..11, Swte 41 9, Jones Buildi ng, Toronw, Onrano M4 Y I) 3 G ASTROINTESTINAL IIEM ORRHAGE 1s a co mmon and serious problem with an average mo rta li ty of I 0% (I). It is often assumed that early correct Jranosis will re<lu ce mortality rate,; how- ev er, several co ntrolled studies hal'e shown no such advantage, anJ there has been little change in morrnlicyover th e p as t 40 ye ars. Since the va11 mai or rty of upp er gastrointcmnal bleeding episo des arc scl f- lim1ceJ , it ha, been c~ timated that more than SOOJ patie nts would ha ve to be ranJorn 1: eJ be fo re a trial could demonstrate t hat end oscopy decreases mo rta li ty. More importantl y, th e maiority of endoscopic trials were ca rried our before the cvolu- tton of th erapeutic technique~ that cm po tentia lly co n t rol gastrointc~tmal bleeding ( 2,3 ). In 80% of patients, the hlecdmg stops spon taneously and the hospital cour e 1s usually benign. However, m patie nts wi th continuous or r ecu rrent bleeding ( 20% ) , mortality and rnor- b 1d1ty are high and emerge ncy sur gcr, is often needed ( 4). Emergency su r gery for upper gastro intestinal bleeding isa1- sociate<l with a higher mortality than for the same operauon perfo rmed elec, t 1vel y. Successful therapeutic endo- scopic intervention in t hb high ri s~ group 1s necessa ry to 11nprove the o ut· co m e. A numb e r o f e ndosco pic th erapeutic m0Ja li t1e~ are now a vail, abl e to tre at upper gast ro mtesnnal 650 CAN J UA~TROENTEROL VOL 4 No 9 DECEMBER 1990

Transcript of Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal...

Page 1: Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleedingdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/cjgh/1990/120392.pdf · Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding PAUL

NON V ARICEAL HEMORRHAGE

Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal

bleeding

PAUL KORTAN, MD, FRCPC

ABSTRACT: G astrointestinal hemorrhage is a common and serious problem -its average mortality of 10% has changed little over the past 40 years. In 80% of patients the bleeding stops spontaneously. In patients with continuous or recur­rent bleedmg (20%), mortality and morbidity are high , and emergency surgery is often required, which has a higher mortality than the same operation performed e lectively. Succes.sful the rapeutic endoscopic mtervenuon in this h igh nsk group is necessary to improve outcome. For injection treatment of no nvariceal bleeding lesions, the autho r has been usmg the Soehendra method (l : I 0,000 adrenaline and poltdocanol) with success m 901

'10 of actively bleeding patients. T h ree con t rollt·d tria ls of endoscopic sclerosis in bleeding peptic ulcer disease showed decreased blood transfusions, surgery and hospita l stay, but did not find any significant difference m mortali ty. The ideal solution and the usefulness of addit ional therapy are questions which must be addressed v ia prospective con­trolled trialsofa large numberof pat ients. CanJ Gastroenterol 1990;4(9):650-652

Key W ords: Adrenaline, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Hemostasis, Injection chera/JY

Traitement par injection des hemorragies gastrointestinales non variqueus.es

RESUME: L'hemorrag1e gastro-incestmale est un probleme courant serieux qui s'accompagne d'une morra lice moyenne de 10 %, chiffre qui a peu change au co urs des quarante dernieres annees. Chez 80 % des patients, l'hemorragie cesse spontanemen t. Chez Jes patients qui saignent consrnmment ou done les sa1gne­men ts recidivent (20 %), la morta lite e t la morbid ite sont elevces et une intervention d 'urgence s'impose souvent, laquelle est assort1e <l'un taux de morta lite supcrieure a celle des memes operations a froid. Dans cc groupe a risque e leve, ii est n ccessaire de recou ri r aux interve n t ions en doscopiq ues therapeuttqucs afin d'ameliorcr les resultats. L'auteur a recours au t ra1tement par injection des lesions non variqueuses qui saignent; ii ut ilise la methode de Soehendra (1 : IO 000 adrenaline et polidocanol) avec succes chez 90 % des patients qui sa ignent acttvemcnt. Trois essa is controles units.mt des injections sclerosantes effectuees sous endoscopic dans le traitement des ulceres gastro ­duodenaux hemorragiq ues rapporten t une diminution des transfusions, des gestes

D1111swn of Gastroenterolo,a, University of Tcmmw, T he WI ellesley / losp,ral , Toronw, Onrano

Correspondence and reprmrs. Dr P Korum , Assrsranr Professm, Dit•1s1cm of GastroenwroloJ:Y, University of Toronto, The Wlellesle"I I losp1tal, 160 Wlellesley Street Ea..11, Swte 41 9, Jones Building, Toronw, Onrano M4Y I) 3

GASTROINTESTINAL I IEMORRHAGE 1s a common and serious problem

with an average mortality of I 0% (I). It is often assumed that early correct Jrag· nosis will re<luce mortality rate,; how­ever, several control led studies hal'e shown no such advantage, anJ there has been little change in morrnlicyover the past 40 years. S ince the va11 maiorr t y o f uppe r gas trointcmnal bleeding episodes arc sclf-lim1ceJ, it ha, been c~timated tha t more than SOOJ patients would have to be ranJorn1:eJ before a tria l could demonstrate that endoscopy decreases mortality. More impo rtan tly, the maiority of endoscopic tria ls were carried our before the cvolu­tton of therapeutic technique~ that cm po tentia lly con t rol gastrointc~tmal bleeding (2,3 ).

In 80% of patients, the hlecdmg stops spo ntaneously and the hospital cour e 1s usually benign. However, m

patients with continuous or recurrent bleeding ( 20%), mortality and rnor­b1d1ty are high and emergency surgcr, is often needed ( 4) . Emergency surgery for upper gastrointest inal bleeding isa1-sociate<l with a higher mortality than for the same operauon performed elec, t 1vely. S uccessfu l the rapeutic endo­scopic intervention in thb high ris~ group 1s necessary to 11nprove the out·

come. A numbe r o f endoscopic therapeutic m0Jalit1e~ are now avail, able to t reat upper gastromtesnnal

650 CAN J UA~TROENTEROL VOL 4 No 9 DECEMBER 1990

Page 2: Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleedingdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/cjgh/1990/120392.pdf · Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding PAUL

chirurgicaux et des hospitalisations, mais ne montrent aucune difference sig­nificative quanc a la mortalite. ll faudrait examiner quelles seraient la solution idfale et l'utilite d'un traitemcnc additionnel a l'aide d'essais prospectifs controles portant sur un grand nombre de patients.

bleeding. These include yttrium­aluminum-garnet (Y AG) laser, monopolar and bipolar coagulation, heater probe and injection therapy. None of these modalities has been suf­ficiently well studied to permit defini­tive recommendations.

The ideal hemostatic technique should be simple, safe, portable, inex­pensive and effective. These criteria are best fulfilled by injection therapy. In­jection sclerotherapy has hcen used ex­tensively in the control of bleeding esophageal vances and over the past few years has gained popularity for non­variceal bleeding. The technique has been practised in Japan and West Ger­many since the mid 1970s (5). A num­ber of different substances have been injected, most of which are vaso­constrictors or sclcrosancs. Table 1 lists the injectable agents that have been u~ for treatment of upper gastrointes­tinal bleeding.

TECHNIQUE Once an active or potential bleeding

site has been accurately located, injec­tion therapy can be attempted. The in­jection is performed using a variceal injecwr. A large single or double chan­nel endoscope is preferred to allow for adequate suctionin g of blood . Sclerosant or vasoconstrictor is in­jected at three or four sites surrounding an exposed bleeding vessel or non­bleeding visible vessel. The volume of agent injected depends on the type and should be minimized to avoid extension of ulcer and transmural injury.

MECHANISMS OF ACTION The hemostatic mechanism of injec­

table agents is based on vasoconstrict­ing or sclerosing effect.

Adrenaline in animal experiments has been shown co cause a prolonged decrease in local gastric bloodflow (6-8). The decrease in flow is felt co be secondary to the vasoconstrictive effect

of adrenaline rather than to a mechani­cal effect of the injected volume.

Injection of absolute ethanol has been shown to cause degeneration and necrosis of the blood vessel wall with consequent thrombosis (9,10). This is accomplished by the fixative effect of ethanol. Part of the hemostasis may be supported by mechanical compression of vessels.

Hypcrtonic saline was shown to

cause tissue edema, degeneration of vas­cular wall and consequent thrombosis in the vascular lumen ( I l).

Rutgeerts (12) examined the tissue effects of adrenaline 1: 10,000, absolute alcohol and 1 % polidocanol, anti com­pared them with Y AG laser and BICAP

in dogs. Adrenaline caused focal damage without thrombosis of sub­mucosal vessels and without serositis. Ethanol caused dehydration and fixa­tion of the tissue with extensive suh­mucosal and muscular necrosis and vessel thrombosis. Serositis was fre­quently observed. There was a linear relationship between the extent of damage and the volume of solution in­jected. Injection of I% polidocanol cause<l lesions characterized by mucosa I necrosis, partial necrosis of submucosa and submucosa l edema. There was par­tial thrombosis of the vessels. The ex­tent of damage from l % polidocanol was related to the volume injected.

CLINICAL EXPERIENCE Uncontrolled studies have been re­

ported on the use of injection treatment with a number of <lifferent hemostatic agents, with successful treatment rang­ing from 84 to 100%. Asaki (9) injected absolute alcohol and obtained hemo­stasis in 10096 of patients with I 0% reblee<ling. Sugawa ( 13) also using al­cohol obtained permanent hemostasis in 88% of patients. Soehendra ( 14) has been injecting adrenaline 1: 10,000 combined with l % polidocanol and ob­tained hemostasis m 84% of pulsatile

CAN J GASTROENTEROL VOL 4 No 9 DECEMBER 1990

Injection therapy for nonvariceal GI bleeding

TABLE 1 Injectable agents used for treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding Adrenaline l: 10,000 Adrenaline and hypertonic saline

solution Adrenaline l : 10,000 followed by

polldocanol Absolute ethanol Thrombln Ethanolamine

bleeders. Leung ( 15) used adrenaline alone with permanent hemostasis in 92% of patients.

Rutgeerts anc..l colleagues ( 16) ran­domized 140 patients with ulcers con­t a in ing an actively hleeding or nonhleeding visible vessel to sham treatment or to one of three endo~copic methods of hemostasis: adrenaline l:10,000 alone, adrenaline 1:10,000 plus I 'Xi polidocanol, and adrenaline followed by YAG laser treatment. In patients with a nonbleeding visible ves­sel. the sham treatment was significant­ly less effective than adrenal ine plus polidocanol or adrenaline plus laser in achieving hemostasis. All three treat­men rs reduced total transfusion requirement sign ificantly compared with sham treatment. Adrenaline plus polidocanol was significantly more effective than adrenaline alone in achieving permanent hemosrnsis. Adrenaline plus laser was also more ef­fective than adrenaline alone, but this difference was not statistically signifi­cant. The authors concluded that injec­tion therapy with adrenaline plus poli<locanol should be the treatment of choice hascd on cost, ease of use and safety.

A recent report from Spain docu­ments the efficacy of this technique in a controlled trial (l 7). One hundred an<l thirteen patients with hemorrhage were randomized to endoscopic injec­tion therapy and Hz blockers, or to 112 blockers alone. Each group had an equal number of patients with hleeding and nonhlee<lmg visible vessels. All les,ons were injected with 3 rn 10 mL of adrenaline I : 10,000 and 6 to 12 mL of I% polidocanol. Major recurrent hlced­ing occurre<l in 5% of injected patients :md in 23% of patients randomized to

651

Page 3: Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleedingdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/cjgh/1990/120392.pdf · Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding PAUL

KORT AN

treatment wah I lz blockers alone (P<0.001 ). The neeJ for emergency surgery was reduccJ from 34 to 5% ( P<0.00 I) and there was n significantly reduccJ requirement for blood trans­fusions and a reduction in the length of hospital stay.

A scconJ randomized stutly by Chung et al ( 18) compared iniection of aJrenaline into blcetling ulcers with no endoscopic treatment. There was a sig­nificant difference in the two groups with respect to requirement for emer­gency surgery, requirement of bkxxl transfusion anti median hospital stay.

The th1rJ prmpect1ve randomized trial was carried out by Balanzo ct al (l 9). They stutlied 72 patients with

REFERENCES l. Silvemem FE, Gilbert DA, TeJe~w

FJ, Buenger NK, Persing J. The Nation-,11 ASGE survey on upper gasrromtes-rmal hleedmg. I. StuJy Jcsign and baseline data. Gastromrcst EnJosc 1981;27:73-9.

2. Silver.,cem FE, Gilbert [)A, Tedesco FD, Buenger NK, Pen,mg J. The Nanonal ASGE survey on upper g,1stro-intestinal hleedmg. IL Clmical pmg-nosttc fa<; )rs. Gasrromtesr EnJosc.. 1981;27:80-93.

3. Mor,::an AG, Clamp SE. OMGE inter-nat10nal upper gastrointestinal bleed-mg survey 1978-1982. Scand J Gastrocnceml ! 984;19(Suppl 95):41-58.

4. Fleischer D. Ecidogy anJ prevalence of severe pers1srenr upper gasmimtestinal hlceJmg. Gastrocnternlogy 1983;84:5 38-43.

5. Soehendra N, Werner BL. New tech-nique for endoscopic treatment of hleedmg gam1c ulcer. Endosrnpy 1976;8:85-7

6. Leung FW, Sung JY, Chung SCS, Leung JWC. Endoscopic assessment of mucosa! hemoJynamic c..hangcs ma canine model of gastric ulcer. Gastromtest Endosc 1989; 3 5: 186.

7. Chung SCS, Leung FW, LeungJWC. Is va~oconstnct11m the mechani,m of hemosrasis in blee<lmg ulcers injected

652

bleeding ulcers. Half were rantlomized to inJection treatment with adrenaline plus poli<locanol and half were man­aged medically. The study again con­firmed the benefit of inject10n therapy comparing the requirement for emer­gency surgery and blooJ transfusions. None of these studies was able to show a significant difference m mortality.

COMPLICATIONS The use of polidocanol has been as,

soc.iatcJ with the appearance of large ulcers when more than 20 mL have been iniccted. The perforation rate is l % (20). ln1cction ot absolute alcohol has been associated with a less than I 'X, perforation rate ( 13 ).

with cpinephnnc? A study usmg reflec-ranee spectrophotometry. Gastmmresr EnJosc 1988;34: 174.

8. ChungSCS, Suen MWM, Galvma M, Lee TW, Leung JWC. The effect of submucosal epmephrme on blood losi. from stand.ml bleeding ukt·rs. Gamointest Endosc 1988; H: 189-90.

9. Asak1 S, Nishimum T, Saroh A, Goto Y. EnJo,cop1c control of gastromtes-tinal hemorrhage by local mjection of absolute ethanol: A hasic assessment of the proceJun:. Tohuku J Exp Ml•d 1983; 140: 3 39-52.

10. Sugawa C, Fujita Y, Lucas CE, Raval M, Masuyama 11. Hemostat1c effect of local intramural mJection of dehydrated ethanol m the canme gastrointestinal tract. Gastromtesl Endnse 1989; 35:28 32.

11. Hir..10 M, Kobayashi T, Masuda K, ct al Emlnscopic.. h:al mJcct1on of hy-pcrtontc.. saline-epinephrine solution to arrest hemorrhage tr<lm the upper gastromtestinal tract. Gastmintest EnJnsc 1985;,UI 3-7.

12. Rutgeerts P, Gehocs K, Vantrappcn G. Experimental studies of 111Ject1on therapy for severe nonvanceal bleeding 111 Jogs. Gastmenterology 1989;97 :610-21.

13. Sugawa C, Fujita Y, Ikeda T, Wale AJ. Endoscopic hcmrn,tas1s ot ninety eight percent dehydrated ethan11I. Surg

CONCLUSIONS ln1ection sclerotherapy h

nonvariceal gastro111tcstmal hleeJ1r 1s the least expensive anJ most wide available form of endosc1)p1c thtr,1p The technique of ll1JCttllln treatmcr is easy w learn, ,md most endoscor1 who pracuce sclerotherapy esophageal vances are ,1ble to pi:rfoq this procedure. The controlled stuJ1~ up to the present time have shown reduction 111 rhe requirement t blood trnnsfus1ons, decreased need (o

surger), shorter hospital st,1y ,tn

therefore a lower overall cost. H,)pe fully larger umtrnllcd stuJ1es 1111 show a significant impact on mo talll y.

Gynccol Ohstct 1986; 162.161 3. 14. SoehcnJrn N, Grimm 11, Stenzel M

lnjecti11n of non-varic~.11 blccJin~ lesions of the gasrmmte.,unal traci. Endoscopy 1985; l 7: 129 32

15. Leung JWC, Chung SCS. Endoswr1C mJecttt•n of aJren.ilm in bleeding pep-tic uker. Ga,tromtt·,t Fndosc 1987;33:7"3-5.

16. Rutgeerts P, Vancrappt·n G, Brnt'Ckatn L, Coremans G, Janssens J, Hide M ( :nmp,mson ot endt1.cop1c pohdoc,mol lllJCCt 10n and Y AG laser rhcr.1py t~,r blcedmg pl'ptlc ulc..cn,. !..meet 1989;1:l 164•7.

17 Panes J, Vivcr J, fomc M, Garcia• Olivares E, Mnrco C, Garau J. Con-trollcJ mal 11f cnJosc\lpK ,clcro<1s m hlcedmg pepuc ukcn,. L meet 1987 ;11: 1292 4.

18. Chung SCS, Leung JWC. St<·clc RJC, Crofts TJ, I I AKC. EndoseopK mj<'C mm of adrenaline tnr actively hlecJmg ulcers: A rnndonmeJ mal. Br Med J 1988;296: 16 31 -3

19. Balanw J, Samz S, Sud, J, ct al. End()-scoptl hemoscas1s by loul mJcction uf epmephrine ,mJ poliJocrnnl m hlceJ· mg ulcer. A prospective random1zcJ mal. Endoscopy I 988;20:289-91

20. W orJehoff D, Ci ros 11. EnJoscop1, huno,tas1s hy inJe<.tion thcr 1py in

high risk patients. Endoscopy 1982;14:!96 9

CAN J GASTROENTI:ROL Vol 4 No 9 DECEMBER 1990

Page 4: Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleedingdownloads.hindawi.com/journals/cjgh/1990/120392.pdf · Injection therapy for nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding PAUL

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com