Informatikdidaktik Pruefen: kriteriumsorientiert – vollständige Frage Paul Miotti Riedstr. 3 6010...
-
Upload
morgan-dolan -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of Informatikdidaktik Pruefen: kriteriumsorientiert – vollständige Frage Paul Miotti Riedstr. 3 6010...
InformatikdidaktikPruefen: kriteriumsorientiert – vollständige Frage
Paul MiottiRiedstr. 3
6010 [email protected]
FDI - Assessment 2Paul Miotti
Prejudices
• Teacher is looking at exams of colleagues… – What would my grades be?
• … and concludes…– My colleague is too nice, too demanding etc.
• Comparisons are important… • Look at the whole package
– Classes / lectures– exam – grades
• Rules Luzern: averages outside 4.1 - 4.8 must be justified. Consequences?
FDI - Assessment 3Paul Miotti
Usual schedule
1. Teaching (along plan of subjects)2. Teacher choses his exam questions3. No taxation4. Corrections using solutions of students5. Grading based on a norm• Diagnostics not considered
• (Teacher tries not to scandalize the colleagues…)
FDI - Assessment 4Paul Miotti
Ideal schedule
1. goals 2. taxation 3. Exam questions that represent the goals 4. Model solutions (good / wrong examples) 5. Model grading 6. AFTERWARDS planning / implementation of classes 7. exam8. Assessements based on criteria
FDI - Assessment 5Paul Miotti
Elemente
• Goals / learning tasks• Bloom‘s taxonomy• Assessments based on criteria vs. on
norms • Complete exam questions• (Diagnostics according to Weinert)
FDI - Assessment 6Paul Miotti
Learning biography
• Coming to terms with one‘s own past is important
• What memories do you have of your exams / marks?
• Marks = „wages“ of students…
FDI - Assessment 7Paul Miotti
retrospectionGymnasium 1972 • A modern teacher explains his way of grading / marks • Correction per class (set of students being taught as a group)• points -> tally sheet • Where is mark 4?
– Gauss is stipulated– Average shall be 4.5– Standard deviation was not mentioned (?) – Measure usually linear, maybe a bit flatter at low end
• „Marks are unimportant as long as sufficient.“• My impression then: positive, transparent• Now: partially unfair, very competitive class• = based on NORM
• What can be done in a better way?
FDI - Assessment 8Paul Miotti
Taxonomie Bloom
BEISPIELE Textverarbeitung (Word)
K1 Wissen Welches ist der Shortcut für Speichern?
K2 Verstehen Welchen Zweck haben Shortcuts?
K3 Anwenden Finde mit Word heraus, welches der Shortcut für die „Hilfe“ ist!
K4 Analysieren Weshalb sind solide Fertigkeiten im Tastaturschreiben für die Textverarbeitung nach wie vor wichtig?
K5 Synthetisieren Entwerfe ein Bewerbungsschreiben für einen Ferien-Job!
K6 Beurteilen Vergleiche Textverarbeitung mit Word mit Star-Office?
FDI - Assessment 9Paul Miotti
Taxonomie Bloom (Lernziele / P-Aufgaben) Quelle: U.a. Metzger SG
Anteile IST SOLL
K1 Wissen Ca. 75%
K2 Verstehen
K3 Anwenden
K4 Analysieren
K5 Synthetisieren
K6 Beurteilen
Summe 100% 100%
FDI - Assessment 10Paul Miotti
There is an alternative
• assess performance … – according to criteria a priori
OR– according to the results a posteriori?
• Why? Law of (big) numbers – small sample
FDI - Assessment 11Paul Miotti
Based on norms vs. criteriaNorms criteria
Test objectPrüfobjekt
Computation of marksBerechnung der Noten
Reference valueBezugsgrösse
Temporal validityZeitliche Gültigkeit
Choice of exam questionsAuswahl der Prüfungsfragen
FDI - Assessment 12Paul Miotti
Basis on norms vs. criterianorms criteria
Test objectPrüfobjekt
subjects taught learning goals
Computation of marksBerechnung der Noten
a posteriori distribution is known
a priori according to taxed learning goals, the real distribution is not known
Reference valueBezugsgrösse
a certain school class ideal / typical student
Temporal validityZeitliche Gültigkeit
limited durable
Choice of exam questionsAuswahl der Prüfungsfragen
estimation of the teacher derived from the learning goals
FDI - Assessment 13Paul Miotti
effects norm orientation
• strong – weak classes/years• strong– weak individuals • motivation of students• satisfaction of students• chances in life / selektion? • Friend at ETH / Absolvent Eliteschule
Paris: „I don‘t expect justice…“
FDI - Assessment 14Paul Miotti
Complete exam question (written)
1. introduction
2. enunciate the question precisely
3. formal structure of answer
4. measure / scale
5. Write down typical good / bad answers
6. Taxation
FDI - Assessment 15Paul Miotti
Hints for oral exams
Written exams are more objective than oral exams
1. Prepare oral questions by writing them down.
2. Let the testee draw the exam questions.
3. Let the testee choose the order of the questions.
4. Maybe adjust error of assessment (f.e. good testee after bad etc.).
5. Examinator / co-examinator write down the marks independently.
6. Don‘t look at earlier grades.
FDI - Assessment 16Paul Miotti
Diagnostics (source: Franz Weinert)
• Continuous evaluation of … – Progress / problems of individual students– Level of difficulty of learning tasks
• --> control of didactical action based on diagnostic knowledge
• Ex: Ask the teacher about the results of his exam tasks (before the exam): What will be the outcome of individual students?
• Heterogenous results…
FDI - Assessment 17Paul Miotti
Questions