Info 6 anot+®

14
Operations & Digital Business Nicolas van Zeebroeck Master in Business Engineering – 2014-2015 [email protected]

description

emarketing

Transcript of Info 6 anot+®

Page 1: Info 6 anot+®

Operations & Digital Business

Nicolas van ZeebroeckMaster in Business Engineering – 2014-2015

[email protected]

Page 2: Info 6 anot+®

Today’s underlying issues

• Cost�and�implementation�of�an�Enterprise�IT�solution• Managing�a�large�IT�project• Managing�organisational�change• Definition�and�measures�of�IT�success• Strategic�alignment

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 2

Page 3: Info 6 anot+®

Framing the�challenge…

• Median�cost�of�an�ERP�solution:�$20�million• $4�million�in�hardware�and�software�

(accounted�for�as�investment)• $16�million�in�project�management,�

consulting,�training,�organisational�change�(accounted�for�as�expenses)

• Sometimes�huge�disasters:• Bombardier:�$130�Mio�(and�failed)• Levi’s:�planned�$5�Mio,�lost�$200�Mio

• To�keep�in�mind:• The�vast�majority�of�IT�implementation�costs�

never�shows�up�in�statistics�of�IT�investments• Complementary�organisational�change�4x�

more�costly�than�IT

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 3

A. Sedik
Here we are talking about EIT implementation, so we implementing EIT software and not any software in this cases is an ERP solution.Such solution cost at the median like 20m$
A. Sedik
When we invest in such a project, 20% are going on our BS in investment but it is only 20%. 80% of the cost of such IT solution is directly going to the I/S: P&L. So when (c) are succeeding in such things, it is directly going to their goodwill
Page 4: Info 6 anot+®

A�preliminary note

• Solutions�to�case�studies can never beposted on�any support• Part�of�the�license terms

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 4

A. Sedik
Which integration and challenges; this table says that we have ≠ stages of internal and external organization. Here we ill talk about internal integration! We can do it at 2 level, at the organizational level and at the functional level! At the operational, we will integrate the ≠ stages in the primary activity/value chain. In this case, we need to integrate a bit of both! So what is this model saying? because there are ≠ dimension that actually help us in the process, it will find out the things that going to be the strongest barriers we are going to face in the process and the degree of effort that we can expect and what are the potential benefit that we can expect by integrating at this level! For ex they say us that the main barrier for integration at the operational level is going to be SGD (we have diff entities, SILO organization that are highly specialized and if they are specialized they will have ≠ objectives, divergences in their goals..). Huge barrier because people are not aligned! When people are too specialized, they look in ≠ directions! The table says us that the effort required to do it are big, but the benefits are huge!
Page 5: Info 6 anot+®

Which integration and�challenges?

Source:�Barki et�Pinsonneault (2005)

A. Sedik
dont need to read it
A. Sedik
PO: if we integrate they will be necesserly changes in the roles and responsabilities, people who used to be landlords in dprt, wille become for ex simple responsible of a little team..
Page 6: Info 6 anot+®

Which integration and�challenges?

• Which returns to�internal integration?• Productivity of�production�processes• Superior�competitiveness• Reduction of�production�and�inventory

costs• Less mistakes,�more�coordination• Better visibility over�production�and�

inventory costs

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 9

Page 7: Info 6 anot+®

PostͲmortem�of�phase�I:�vision

• Organisational transformation�projects�require�clear�vision,well�communicated�to�employees• Vision�should�provide�clear�view�of�future�state�of�the�organisation,�its�goals,�

processes,�and�supporting�systems

• Vision�must�be�goalͲoriented

• Vision�should�strengthen�the�organisational sense�of�direction�and�improve�the�decisionͲmaking�process

• Action�plan�describes�stages�required�to�realise the�vision

• Actions�should�be�aligned�with�vision�goals

• As�project�evolves,�vision�refinement�process�should�be�undertaken

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 17

Page 8: Info 6 anot+®

How�to�measure�success?• System�quality

• Is�the�system�usable�and�reliable?• Information�quality

• Is�the�data�model�clear and�standardized?• Are�the�data�consistent�and�accurate?

• Usage• Is�the�system�actually used?• Is�the�use�of�the�new�system�controlled and�incentivized?

• User�satisfaction• How�satisfied are�the�users with the�new�system?

• Individual impact• How�does the�system�affect�individual performance?

• Organizational impact• How�does the�system�affect�the�overall performance�of�the�

organization?

Source:�DeLone &�McLean�(2003)

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 28

A. Sedik
either yes it is good or not.. But it is not enough! But the point here is what other criteria
A. Sedik
or they contnue using the old system?
A. Sedik
are they happy with the new system?
A. Sedik
6 criteria!
A. Sedik
like moodle? is it really reliable or trash when we use it?
A. Sedik
does it foster the individual performance?
Page 9: Info 6 anot+®

How�to�measure success?

Source:�DeLone &�McLean�(1993)

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 29

A. Sedik
There is a way to organize those 6 package as a chain.. System and info qty should axctually be the main thing in use and user satis. If people use the system and the qty of info is good. Then it will impact on individua and (à) impact!this framework was proposed 20 years ago!
Page 10: Info 6 anot+®

A�model�of�strategic�alignment

Source:�Henderson�&�Venkatraman (1993)

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 32

A. Sedik
Where does it all start? Sometimes it start with IT, but it was not the case here! When we look between the 2 phases, the IT is just a little player here.. the important thing was the process behind,..
A. Sedik
What we want to achieve, composed of 3 things, the scope, our distinctive competententcies (what can we do) and the goverance. And those 3 thing need to be consistant!
A. Sedik
the same for the IT!
A. Sedik
how do we take decisions?
A. Sedik
Those are 2 // world, the business and the IT one
A. Sedik
The lower part, is what we call the infrastructure. At the business infrastructure we have the as in IT, we have the admin infra, process (deliver services,..) and we have skill (workforce within the (O)!
A. Sedik
In IT infrastructure we have the IT archi (xhat we studied), processes and the IT skills(people wotking in IT drt). This how our ressources are organized and working together.
A. Sedik
So we now have 2 types of matrix, the upper part the strategy and down we have the infrastructure and ressources! and on the left side busines and right the IT
A. Sedik
But the ? is to how to make sure that business strategy is aligned with ITstrategy? Or how to be sure that the business stratecgy is aligned with the (o) infrastructure?
Page 11: Info 6 anot+®

A�model�of�strategic�alignment

Source:�Henderson�&�Venkatraman (1993)

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 33

A. Sedik
In bombardier how did we start? from the business strategy, and what was it? the vision, we wanted lower cost, more integrated.. From there where did we go?they first decided to change the (o) first and then we can implement the IT: they first moved to the (o) infrastructure(phase 2).. And finaly they moved to the IT infrastructure! But is not the only way possible! There are other way to act!
A. Sedik
We need to answer for each of those questions! who is the driver? here it started from the BS. And then what do you ask from the top mgt? The top mgt is responsible for formulating the strategy.. And then what do we expect fro the CIO? he will be the implementor!
Page 12: Info 6 anot+®

Enterprise IT Implementation

Key take-aways

Page 13: Info 6 anot+®

IT�Implementation:�Key�takeͲaways

• EIT�implementations�=�organisational transformation projects• Global�vision�is�critical• Anticipating�organisational change�is�paramount

• Managing�project�resources• Support�v.�Development�tradeͲoff

• Different�dimensions�in�the�evaluation�of�an�IT�project• System�quality,�data�quality,�actual�use,�user�satisfaction,�individual�impact,�

organisational impact• Very�common�to�focus�exclusively�on�the�latter• Successful�project�does�not�mean�easy�to�execute

• Strategic�alignment�process• Who�is�in�the�driver’s�seat?• What�is�the�role�of�IT?

GESTS482�– Operations�and�Digital�Business�– N.�van�Zeebroeck�– 2014Ͳ2015 35

Page 14: Info 6 anot+®

Your assignments

Assignments on�IT�Implementation

• Apply�the�DeLone &�McLean�(2003)�framework�of�IT�success• Provide�evidence�from�the�case�of�success�or�shortcomings�on�each�of�the�6�

dimensions

• Read�the�articles• Bloom,�Sadun,�Van�Rennen Ͳ Americans�do�IT�better• DeLone,�McLean�ͲModel�of�Information�Systems�Success

GESTS482 – Operations and Digital Business – N. van Zeebroeck – 2014-2015 36