INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality ... · INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity...

20
Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality Conference Generating Inclusive Growth, Nuffield College, 8/9 November 2018 Wage Stagnation and Reinvigorating Wage Growth: The German experience Gerhard Bosch /Thorsten Kalina University Duisburg-Essen, IAQ Prof. Dr. Gerhard Bosch / Dr. Thorsten Kalina Universität Duisburg Essen Institut Arbeit und Qualifikation Forsthausweg 2, LE, 47057 Duisburg Tel: +49 (0)203 / 379-1339; Fax: +49 (0)203 / 379-1809 Email: [email protected]; www.iaq.uni-due.de

Transcript of INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality ... · INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity...

  • Inst

    itut

    Arb

    eit

    und

    Qua

    lifik

    atio

    n

    INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality ConferenceGenerating Inclusive Growth, Nuffield College, 8/9 November 2018

    Wage Stagnation and Reinvigorating Wage Growth: The German experience

    Gerhard Bosch /Thorsten Kalina University Duisburg-Essen, IAQ

    Prof. Dr. Gerhard Bosch / Dr. Thorsten KalinaUniversität Duisburg EssenInstitut Arbeit und QualifikationForsthausweg 2, LE, 47057 DuisburgTel: +49 (0)203 / 379-1339; Fax: +49 (0)203 / 379-1809 Email: [email protected]; www.iaq.uni-due.de

  • Outline

    1. German wage moderation – a European problem?

    2. Stagnating ordinary living standards and increasing

    income inequality

    3. Main drivers of change

    4. Conclusions

  • - Below average wage and unit costs increases in Germany- In combination with declining public investments also below average increase of domestic demand and imports- Increasing German export surpluses (2017 = 7,6% of GDP) contributing to European imbalances - But German exports not very price-elastic: “Overall there is no evidence that wage developments are at the root of the development” (EC 2012: 91)- reducing Germany’s current account surplus lies not solely in wages policy but also in an expansive national fiscal policy with an increase in public investment- “However, Germany is not yet ready to take its financial policy in this direction” (Horn et al. 2017: 20).

    1.1. German wage moderation – a European problem?

  • 1.1 Evolution of employee remuneration in the Eurozone and in selected EU member states 2000 -2017

    Quelle/ Source:

    Hier die Grafik mit ALT-Taste und Maus

    positionieren

    Hier die Grafik mit ALT-Taste und Maus

    positionieren

    … Eurozone1 Employee remuneration per hour. Seasonally and working day adjusted. In national currency.

    2000q1=100

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

    Finland

    Belgium

    France

    Netherlands Germany

    Austria90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

    Spain

    Italy

    Greece

  • 1.2 Increasing imbalances of payments in EU (in billion €)

    Source: Albu et al. (2017) IMK Report 128.

    IrelandItalyPortugalSpainAustriaBelgium

    Germany

    NetherlandsGreeceFrance

  • 1.3 Development of domestic demand 2000q1=100 (1)

    Source: Albu et al. (2017). IMK Report 128.

    Belgium

    Finland

    France

    Netherlands

    Germany

    Euro zone

  • - Until 1990: Wages followed GDP growth – no increase in income inequality- After unification until 1995 strong increase of low East German market incomes and pensions- After 1995

    - decoupling of GDP and wages- increasing inequality of market wages and household

    incomes- stagnating living standards up to the 5th decile

    - low wages important driver of increasing inequality ofhousehod incomes

    2.1. Stagnating ordinary living standards and increasing income inequality

  • 2.1 Evolution of real hourly wages by decile in West Germany (all dependent employees) – With GDP per hour worked as comparison

    Source: Source: Own calculations using the SOEP v32.1; GDP per hour worked, adjusted for prices, for West Germany up to 1991, for Germany as a whole from 1992 onwards: Statistisches Bundesamt, own calculations

    80

    90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    150

    160

    170

    180

    GDP per hour worked

    D9

    D5

    D1

  • 2.2 Hourly gross wage of employees by Deciles1995-2015

    Source: Bundesregierung, Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht 2017 (based on SOEP v32)

  • 2.3 Evolution of household real incomes before state redistribution by decile (working-age population 25 to 65 years of age) 1983 – 2014 and per capita GDP (until 1990 West- Germany, after 1990 Germany)

    Source: Own calculations using SOEP v32.1; GDP: Statistisches Bundesamt, own calculations.

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180GDP per capitaD9D5D1

  • 2.4 Household incomes after state redistribution –Households of older citizens (65 and over) compared with working-age households (25 to 65) - Deciles

    Source: SOEP v32.1, own calculations

    90

    95

    100

    105

    110

    115

    120

    125

    130

    1983

    1984

    1985

    1986

    1987

    1988

    1989

    1990

    1991

    1992

    1993

    1994

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    D1 - 65+

    D5 - 65+

    D9 - 65+

    D9 working age

    D5 working age

    D1 working age

  • 2.5 The low wage risk of dependent employees in households by income bracket (pre state redistribution) 1995 to 2014

    Source: SOEP v32.1, own calculations. Low wage risk and household income in the various income brackets relate to the years as listed, not the previous years.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    Bottom

    Lower middle

    Intermediate middle

    Total

    Upper middle

    Top

  • 3.1 Main drivers of falling income standards

    - Erosion of the inclusive wage system:- Privatization of public services (e.g. public transport, telecommunication)- Growth of atypical employment- Erosion of autonomous system of collective bargaining- Deregulation of labor law (Hartz-laws)

    - Increasing inequality of working hours- Strengthening of old family model: strong financial incentives to

    work short hours- Reduction of progressive income and corporate taxes: increased

    financial pressures on the welfare state- Reduction of pension levels (effects will show up over the next 40

    years)

  • 3.1 End of pattern agreements

  • 3.2 Declining coverage by collective agreements

    Source: Source: WSI Tarifarchiv (based on IAB Establishment Panel data)

  • 3.3 Rate of coverage by collective agreements and share of low-wage work (2014)

    Source: Visser 2015, Eurostat, own calculations

    Diagramm1

    22.48

    11.94

    15.08

    14.76

    2.64

    5.28

    8.81

    3.79

    24.4

    21.26

    17.75

    22.76

    23.56

    8.61

    23.96

    25.46

    18.52

    19.21

    12.03

    9.44

    18.69

    21.56

    18.47

    14.59

    18.19

    19.33

    adjcov: Adjusted bargaining (or union) coverage rate

    share of low wage earners in %

    Coverage by collective agreements in %

    Correlation: - 0,82

    DE

    LU

    MT

    AT

    SE

    FI

    FR

    BE

    RO

    UK

    HU

    EE

    PL

    DK

    LT

    LV

    NL

    SK

    PT

    IT

    CZ

    IE

    SI

    ES

    BG

    CY

    57.6

    59

    62.79

    98

    89

    93

    98

    96

    35

    11.92

    23

    23

    14.67

    84

    9.89

    15

    84.84

    24.9

    67

    80

    47.29

    40.49

    65

    77.58

    29

    45.19

    Data

    Niedriglohnempfänger als Prozentsatz der gesamten Angestellten (ohne Auszubildenden) nach Geschlecht [earn_ses_pub1s]

    Letzte Aktualisierung07.12.16

    Exportierte Daten19.02.17

    Quelle der DatenEurostat

    UNITProzent

    SEXInsgesamt

    SIZECLAS10 Arbeitnehmer und mehr

    GEO/TIME200620102014Niedriglohnempfänger als Prozentsatz der gesamten Angestellten (ohne Auszubildenden) nach Geschlechtadjcov: Adjusted bargaining (or union) coverage rateKorr

    Europäische Union (28 Länder):16.9617.15DE22.4857.6-0.82

    Europäische Union (27 Länder)16.6916.9317.15LU11.9459

    Euroraum (19 Länder)::15.88MT15.0862.79

    Euroraum (17 Länder)14.2714.7815.7AT14.7698

    Belgien6,82+B34B16:B406.373.79SE2.6489

    Bulgarien18.922.0118.19FI5.2893

    Tschechische Republik17.0518.1918.69FR8.8198

    Dänemark8.318.178.61BE3.7996

    Deutschland (bis 1990 früheres Gebiet der BRD)20.322.2422.48RO24.435

    Estland23.1923.7622.76UK21.2611.92

    Irland21.4120.6621.56HU17.7523

    Griechenland15.7312.82:EE22.7623

    Spanien13.3714.6614.59PL23.5614.67

    Frankreich7.136.088.81DK8.6184

    Kroatien:21.35:LT23.969.89

    Italien10.2712.369.44LV25.4615

    Zypern22.6522.6219.33NL18.5284.84

    Lettland30.927.8125.46SK19.2124.9

    Litauen29.1227.2423.96PT12.0367

    Luxemburg13.1813.0611.94IT9.4480

    Ungarn21.8719.5117.75CZ18.6947.29

    Malta14.4317.6115.08IE21.5640.49

    Niederlande17.7417.4618.52SI18.4765

    Österreich14.1915.0214.76ES14.5977.58

    Polen24.7224.1623.56BG18.1929

    Portugal20.7216.0812.03CY19.3345.19

    Rumänien26.8525.8224.4

    Slowenien19.2417.1418.47

    Slowakei18.319.0319.21

    Finnland4.755.855.28

    Schweden1.772.512.64

    Vereinigtes Königreich21.7722.0621.26

    Island11.248.997.54

    Norwegen6.487.278.29

    Schweiz:11.039.37

    Montenegro::27.25

    Die ehemalige jugoslawische Republik Mazedonien:28.2525.13

    Serbien::22.91

    Türkei0.240.40.46

    Sonderzeichen:

    :nicht verfügbar

    Data

    adjcov: Adjusted bargaining (or union) coverage rate

    Share of low wage earners

    Coverage by collective agreements

    Korrelation: - 0,82

    DE

    LU

    MT

    AT

    SE

    FI

    FR

    BE

    RO

    UK

    HU

    EE

    PL

    DK

    LT

    LV

    NL

    SK

    PT

    IT

    CZ

    IE

    SI

    ES

    BG

    CY

  • 3.5 Annual gross working time volumes by income bracket (pre-state-redistribution) – percentage change (working households – Germany as a whole)

    Source: Own calculations using the SOEP v32.1. Working households have a head of household between 25 and 65 years of age and income from gainful employment.

    1.864

    2.667 2.967

    3.268 3.433

    3.021

    1.289

    2.126

    2.526 2.849

    3.209

    2.631

    -30,9

    -20,3

    -14,9 -12,8

    -6,5

    -12,9

    -35

    -25

    -15

    -5

    5

    15

    25

    35

    45

    -3.500

    -2.500

    -1.500

    -500

    500

    1.500

    2.500

    3.500

    4.500

    Bottom Lower middle Intermediate middle Upper middle Top Total

    1992-1995 2012-2015 Change 1992/95 to 2012/15

  • 3.7 Main drivers of improving income standards

    - Introduction of care insurance in the late 1990‘s- New family model: Expansion of child care and all-day schools, paid

    parental leave, new working time options (from FT to PT and vice verse) – less part-time penalties – longer hours

    - Job miracle in the financial crisis: reduction of working hours not of jobs, recruitment of apprentices even in the crisis

    - Introduction of Minimum wage and facilitation of extending collective agreements

    - Strong job growth since 2004, especially skilled service jobs

  • Nominal grow th in contractual hourly pay over two years by deciles 1998 - 2016

    Quelle/ Source:

  • Conclusions

    • Growing inequality of market and household incomes• Main drivers:

    - Erosion of the inclusive wage system- Increasing inequality in the distribution of working hours

    Main policy changes- Reduction of inequality in the primary distribution by

    increasing coverage by collective agreements- More equal distribution of working hours across income

    classes (also skill question!!) - Abolition of incentives to work short hours linked with

    traditional family model- Higher taxation of top earners

    Quelle/ Source:

    �Wage Stagnation and Reinvigorating Wage Growth: The German experience��Gerhard Bosch /Thorsten Kalina University Duisburg-Essen, IAQ�Outline��1. German wage moderation – a European problem?�2. Stagnating ordinary living standards and increasing income inequality�3. Main drivers of change�4. Conclusions- Below average wage and unit costs increases in Germany�- In combination with declining public investments also below average increase of domestic demand and imports�- Increasing German export surpluses (2017 = 7,6% of GDP) contributing to European imbalances �- But German exports not very price-elastic: “Overall there is no evidence that wage developments are at the root of the development” (EC 2012: 91)�- reducing Germany’s current account surplus lies not solely in wages policy but also in an expansive national fiscal policy with an increase in public investment�- “However, Germany is not yet ready to take its financial policy in this direction” (Horn et al. 2017: 20).1.1 Evolution of employee remuneration in the Eurozone and in selected EU member states 2000 -20171.2 Increasing imbalances of payments in EU (in billion €)1.3 Development of domestic demand 2000q1=100 (1)- Until 1990: Wages followed GDP growth – no increase in income inequality�- After unification until 1995 strong increase of low East German market incomes and pensions�- After 1995 �- decoupling of GDP and wages�- increasing inequality of market wages and household incomes�- stagnating living standards up to the 5th decile��- low wages important driver of increasing inequality of househod incomes2.1 Evolution of real hourly wages by decile in West Germany (all dependent employees) – With GDP per hour worked as comparison2.2 Hourly gross wage of employees by Deciles 1995-20152.3 Evolution of household real incomes before state redistribution by decile (working-age population 25 to 65 years of age) 1983 – 2014 and per capita GDP (until 1990 West- Germany, after 1990 Germany)2.4 Household incomes after state redistribution – Households of older citizens (65 and over) compared with working-age households (25 to 65) - Deciles2.5 The low wage risk of dependent employees in households by income bracket (pre state redistribution) 1995 to 2014�3.1 Main drivers of falling income standards 3.1 End of pattern agreements3.2 Declining coverage by collective agreements3.3 Rate of coverage by collective agreements and share of low-wage work (2014)3.5 Annual gross working time volumes by income bracket (pre-state-redistribution) – percentage change (working households – Germany as a whole)�3.7 Main drivers of improving income standards Nominal growth in contractual hourly pay over two years by deciles 1998 - 2016Conclusions