INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality ... · INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity...
Transcript of INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality ... · INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity...
-
Inst
itut
Arb
eit
und
Qua
lifik
atio
n
INET Oxford/OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality ConferenceGenerating Inclusive Growth, Nuffield College, 8/9 November 2018
Wage Stagnation and Reinvigorating Wage Growth: The German experience
Gerhard Bosch /Thorsten Kalina University Duisburg-Essen, IAQ
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Bosch / Dr. Thorsten KalinaUniversität Duisburg EssenInstitut Arbeit und QualifikationForsthausweg 2, LE, 47057 DuisburgTel: +49 (0)203 / 379-1339; Fax: +49 (0)203 / 379-1809 Email: [email protected]; www.iaq.uni-due.de
-
Outline
1. German wage moderation – a European problem?
2. Stagnating ordinary living standards and increasing
income inequality
3. Main drivers of change
4. Conclusions
-
- Below average wage and unit costs increases in Germany- In combination with declining public investments also below average increase of domestic demand and imports- Increasing German export surpluses (2017 = 7,6% of GDP) contributing to European imbalances - But German exports not very price-elastic: “Overall there is no evidence that wage developments are at the root of the development” (EC 2012: 91)- reducing Germany’s current account surplus lies not solely in wages policy but also in an expansive national fiscal policy with an increase in public investment- “However, Germany is not yet ready to take its financial policy in this direction” (Horn et al. 2017: 20).
1.1. German wage moderation – a European problem?
-
1.1 Evolution of employee remuneration in the Eurozone and in selected EU member states 2000 -2017
Quelle/ Source:
Hier die Grafik mit ALT-Taste und Maus
positionieren
Hier die Grafik mit ALT-Taste und Maus
positionieren
… Eurozone1 Employee remuneration per hour. Seasonally and working day adjusted. In national currency.
2000q1=100
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Finland
Belgium
France
Netherlands Germany
Austria90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Spain
Italy
Greece
-
1.2 Increasing imbalances of payments in EU (in billion €)
Source: Albu et al. (2017) IMK Report 128.
IrelandItalyPortugalSpainAustriaBelgium
Germany
NetherlandsGreeceFrance
-
1.3 Development of domestic demand 2000q1=100 (1)
Source: Albu et al. (2017). IMK Report 128.
Belgium
Finland
France
Netherlands
Germany
Euro zone
-
- Until 1990: Wages followed GDP growth – no increase in income inequality- After unification until 1995 strong increase of low East German market incomes and pensions- After 1995
- decoupling of GDP and wages- increasing inequality of market wages and household
incomes- stagnating living standards up to the 5th decile
- low wages important driver of increasing inequality ofhousehod incomes
2.1. Stagnating ordinary living standards and increasing income inequality
-
2.1 Evolution of real hourly wages by decile in West Germany (all dependent employees) – With GDP per hour worked as comparison
Source: Source: Own calculations using the SOEP v32.1; GDP per hour worked, adjusted for prices, for West Germany up to 1991, for Germany as a whole from 1992 onwards: Statistisches Bundesamt, own calculations
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
GDP per hour worked
D9
D5
D1
-
2.2 Hourly gross wage of employees by Deciles1995-2015
Source: Bundesregierung, Armuts- und Reichtumsbericht 2017 (based on SOEP v32)
-
2.3 Evolution of household real incomes before state redistribution by decile (working-age population 25 to 65 years of age) 1983 – 2014 and per capita GDP (until 1990 West- Germany, after 1990 Germany)
Source: Own calculations using SOEP v32.1; GDP: Statistisches Bundesamt, own calculations.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180GDP per capitaD9D5D1
-
2.4 Household incomes after state redistribution –Households of older citizens (65 and over) compared with working-age households (25 to 65) - Deciles
Source: SOEP v32.1, own calculations
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
D1 - 65+
D5 - 65+
D9 - 65+
D9 working age
D5 working age
D1 working age
-
2.5 The low wage risk of dependent employees in households by income bracket (pre state redistribution) 1995 to 2014
Source: SOEP v32.1, own calculations. Low wage risk and household income in the various income brackets relate to the years as listed, not the previous years.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Bottom
Lower middle
Intermediate middle
Total
Upper middle
Top
-
3.1 Main drivers of falling income standards
- Erosion of the inclusive wage system:- Privatization of public services (e.g. public transport, telecommunication)- Growth of atypical employment- Erosion of autonomous system of collective bargaining- Deregulation of labor law (Hartz-laws)
- Increasing inequality of working hours- Strengthening of old family model: strong financial incentives to
work short hours- Reduction of progressive income and corporate taxes: increased
financial pressures on the welfare state- Reduction of pension levels (effects will show up over the next 40
years)
-
3.1 End of pattern agreements
-
3.2 Declining coverage by collective agreements
Source: Source: WSI Tarifarchiv (based on IAB Establishment Panel data)
-
3.3 Rate of coverage by collective agreements and share of low-wage work (2014)
Source: Visser 2015, Eurostat, own calculations
Diagramm1
22.48
11.94
15.08
14.76
2.64
5.28
8.81
3.79
24.4
21.26
17.75
22.76
23.56
8.61
23.96
25.46
18.52
19.21
12.03
9.44
18.69
21.56
18.47
14.59
18.19
19.33
adjcov: Adjusted bargaining (or union) coverage rate
share of low wage earners in %
Coverage by collective agreements in %
Correlation: - 0,82
DE
LU
MT
AT
SE
FI
FR
BE
RO
UK
HU
EE
PL
DK
LT
LV
NL
SK
PT
IT
CZ
IE
SI
ES
BG
CY
57.6
59
62.79
98
89
93
98
96
35
11.92
23
23
14.67
84
9.89
15
84.84
24.9
67
80
47.29
40.49
65
77.58
29
45.19
Data
Niedriglohnempfänger als Prozentsatz der gesamten Angestellten (ohne Auszubildenden) nach Geschlecht [earn_ses_pub1s]
Letzte Aktualisierung07.12.16
Exportierte Daten19.02.17
Quelle der DatenEurostat
UNITProzent
SEXInsgesamt
SIZECLAS10 Arbeitnehmer und mehr
GEO/TIME200620102014Niedriglohnempfänger als Prozentsatz der gesamten Angestellten (ohne Auszubildenden) nach Geschlechtadjcov: Adjusted bargaining (or union) coverage rateKorr
Europäische Union (28 Länder):16.9617.15DE22.4857.6-0.82
Europäische Union (27 Länder)16.6916.9317.15LU11.9459
Euroraum (19 Länder)::15.88MT15.0862.79
Euroraum (17 Länder)14.2714.7815.7AT14.7698
Belgien6,82+B34B16:B406.373.79SE2.6489
Bulgarien18.922.0118.19FI5.2893
Tschechische Republik17.0518.1918.69FR8.8198
Dänemark8.318.178.61BE3.7996
Deutschland (bis 1990 früheres Gebiet der BRD)20.322.2422.48RO24.435
Estland23.1923.7622.76UK21.2611.92
Irland21.4120.6621.56HU17.7523
Griechenland15.7312.82:EE22.7623
Spanien13.3714.6614.59PL23.5614.67
Frankreich7.136.088.81DK8.6184
Kroatien:21.35:LT23.969.89
Italien10.2712.369.44LV25.4615
Zypern22.6522.6219.33NL18.5284.84
Lettland30.927.8125.46SK19.2124.9
Litauen29.1227.2423.96PT12.0367
Luxemburg13.1813.0611.94IT9.4480
Ungarn21.8719.5117.75CZ18.6947.29
Malta14.4317.6115.08IE21.5640.49
Niederlande17.7417.4618.52SI18.4765
Österreich14.1915.0214.76ES14.5977.58
Polen24.7224.1623.56BG18.1929
Portugal20.7216.0812.03CY19.3345.19
Rumänien26.8525.8224.4
Slowenien19.2417.1418.47
Slowakei18.319.0319.21
Finnland4.755.855.28
Schweden1.772.512.64
Vereinigtes Königreich21.7722.0621.26
Island11.248.997.54
Norwegen6.487.278.29
Schweiz:11.039.37
Montenegro::27.25
Die ehemalige jugoslawische Republik Mazedonien:28.2525.13
Serbien::22.91
Türkei0.240.40.46
Sonderzeichen:
:nicht verfügbar
Data
adjcov: Adjusted bargaining (or union) coverage rate
Share of low wage earners
Coverage by collective agreements
Korrelation: - 0,82
DE
LU
MT
AT
SE
FI
FR
BE
RO
UK
HU
EE
PL
DK
LT
LV
NL
SK
PT
IT
CZ
IE
SI
ES
BG
CY
-
3.5 Annual gross working time volumes by income bracket (pre-state-redistribution) – percentage change (working households – Germany as a whole)
Source: Own calculations using the SOEP v32.1. Working households have a head of household between 25 and 65 years of age and income from gainful employment.
1.864
2.667 2.967
3.268 3.433
3.021
1.289
2.126
2.526 2.849
3.209
2.631
-30,9
-20,3
-14,9 -12,8
-6,5
-12,9
-35
-25
-15
-5
5
15
25
35
45
-3.500
-2.500
-1.500
-500
500
1.500
2.500
3.500
4.500
Bottom Lower middle Intermediate middle Upper middle Top Total
1992-1995 2012-2015 Change 1992/95 to 2012/15
-
3.7 Main drivers of improving income standards
- Introduction of care insurance in the late 1990‘s- New family model: Expansion of child care and all-day schools, paid
parental leave, new working time options (from FT to PT and vice verse) – less part-time penalties – longer hours
- Job miracle in the financial crisis: reduction of working hours not of jobs, recruitment of apprentices even in the crisis
- Introduction of Minimum wage and facilitation of extending collective agreements
- Strong job growth since 2004, especially skilled service jobs
-
Nominal grow th in contractual hourly pay over two years by deciles 1998 - 2016
Quelle/ Source:
-
Conclusions
• Growing inequality of market and household incomes• Main drivers:
- Erosion of the inclusive wage system- Increasing inequality in the distribution of working hours
Main policy changes- Reduction of inequality in the primary distribution by
increasing coverage by collective agreements- More equal distribution of working hours across income
classes (also skill question!!) - Abolition of incentives to work short hours linked with
traditional family model- Higher taxation of top earners
Quelle/ Source:
�Wage Stagnation and Reinvigorating Wage Growth: The German experience��Gerhard Bosch /Thorsten Kalina University Duisburg-Essen, IAQ�Outline��1. German wage moderation – a European problem?�2. Stagnating ordinary living standards and increasing income inequality�3. Main drivers of change�4. Conclusions- Below average wage and unit costs increases in Germany�- In combination with declining public investments also below average increase of domestic demand and imports�- Increasing German export surpluses (2017 = 7,6% of GDP) contributing to European imbalances �- But German exports not very price-elastic: “Overall there is no evidence that wage developments are at the root of the development” (EC 2012: 91)�- reducing Germany’s current account surplus lies not solely in wages policy but also in an expansive national fiscal policy with an increase in public investment�- “However, Germany is not yet ready to take its financial policy in this direction” (Horn et al. 2017: 20).1.1 Evolution of employee remuneration in the Eurozone and in selected EU member states 2000 -20171.2 Increasing imbalances of payments in EU (in billion €)1.3 Development of domestic demand 2000q1=100 (1)- Until 1990: Wages followed GDP growth – no increase in income inequality�- After unification until 1995 strong increase of low East German market incomes and pensions�- After 1995 �- decoupling of GDP and wages�- increasing inequality of market wages and household incomes�- stagnating living standards up to the 5th decile��- low wages important driver of increasing inequality of househod incomes2.1 Evolution of real hourly wages by decile in West Germany (all dependent employees) – With GDP per hour worked as comparison2.2 Hourly gross wage of employees by Deciles 1995-20152.3 Evolution of household real incomes before state redistribution by decile (working-age population 25 to 65 years of age) 1983 – 2014 and per capita GDP (until 1990 West- Germany, after 1990 Germany)2.4 Household incomes after state redistribution – Households of older citizens (65 and over) compared with working-age households (25 to 65) - Deciles2.5 The low wage risk of dependent employees in households by income bracket (pre state redistribution) 1995 to 2014�3.1 Main drivers of falling income standards 3.1 End of pattern agreements3.2 Declining coverage by collective agreements3.3 Rate of coverage by collective agreements and share of low-wage work (2014)3.5 Annual gross working time volumes by income bracket (pre-state-redistribution) – percentage change (working households – Germany as a whole)�3.7 Main drivers of improving income standards Nominal growth in contractual hourly pay over two years by deciles 1998 - 2016Conclusions