Industrial Hygiene ERT 312 Lecture 7 – Identification, Evaluation and Control.
-
Upload
archibald-sanders -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
4
Transcript of Industrial Hygiene ERT 312 Lecture 7 – Identification, Evaluation and Control.
Industrial HygieneERT 312
Lecture 7 – Identification, Evaluation and Control
Identification Able to identify the hazard from single
exposure or potential combined effects from multiple exposures
Require deep study on the chemical process, operating conditions and operating procedures
Source of information; Process design descriptions Operating instructions Safety reviews Equipment specs Etc.
2
3
4
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) Chemical Safety Data Sheets (CSDS) MSDS lists the physical properties of a
substance that may be required to determine the potential hazards of the substance
Manufacturer/supplier is responsible to provide the MSDS to their customers
* Example of MSDS
5
Evaluation To determine the extent and degree of
employee exposure to toxicants and physical hazards in the workplace
Once exposure data obtained, comparison is being made to acceptable occupational health standards eg: TLVs, PELs and IDLH concentrations (page 56)
Then, the decision on proper control measure can be made accordingly in order to reduce the risk
6
Threshold Limit Value (TLV) of a chemical substance is a level to which it is believed a worker can be exposed day after day for a working lifetime without adverse health effects
The Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL or OSHA PEL) is a legal limit for exposure of an employee to a substance or physical agent. For substances it is usually expressed in parts per million (ppm), or sometimes in milligrams per cubic metre (mg/m3)
IDLH is an initials for Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health, and is defined by the NIOSH as exposure to airborne contaminants that is "likely to cause death or immediate or delayed permanent adverse health effects or prevent escape from such an environment”
7
Table 2.7 – established by ACGIH
8
TLVs units – ppm, mg/m3, For dust – mg/m3 or mppcf For vapors, concentration in ppm;
Cppm =
=
T (temperature, Kelvin), P (absolute pressure, atm) M (molecular weight, g/g-mol)
)/)(1
)(273
(4.22 3mmg
P
T
M
)/)((08205.0 3mmgPM
T
Equation 1
Equation 2
9
Problem 2.7 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002) How much acetone liquid (ml) required to
produce a vapor concentration of 200 ppm in a room of dimension 3 x 4 x 10 m? Given T is 25°C, P is 1 atm, molecular weight is 58.1 and specific gravity is 0.7899.
10
11
Evaluation Exposure of Organic Toxicants The simplest way to determine worker exposures
is through continuous monitoring of the air concentrations.
For computation of continuous concentration data C(t) the TWA concentration,
C(t) the concentration of the toxicant in the air, ppm @ mg/m3
tw the worker shift time in hours
wt
dttCTWA0
)(8
1Equation 3
12
Sometimes, continuous monitoring is not feasible. Therefore, intermittent samples representing worker exposure at fixed points of time are obtained.
8
...2211 nn
TCTCTCTWA
Single Component Exposure, workers are overexposed if the sum of conc. >
permitted TWA
Equation 4
13
Example 3.3 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002) Determine the 8-hr TWA worker exposure if
the worker is exposed to toluene vapors as follows;
Solution:
Answer: 155 ppm
Duration (h) Concentration (ppm)
2 110
2 330
4 90
8
...2211 nn
TCTCTCTWA
Equation 5
14
For a case of more than 1 toxicant is present in the workplace; the combined exposures from multiple toxicants with different TLV-TWAs is determined by;
n the total number of toxicants Ci the conc. of toxicant i with
respect to the other toxicants (TLV-TWA)ithe TLV-TWA for toxicant sp. i
n
ii
i
TWATLV
C1 )(
If the sum of the equation > 1, workers
are overexposedEquation 6
15
The mixture also TLV-TWA can be computed using equation below;
n
ii
i
n
ii
mix
TWATLVC
CTWATLV
1
1
)(
)(
If the total mixture conc. > (TLV-TWA)mix , workers are overexposed
Equation 7
16
Example 3.2 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)Air contains 5 ppm of diethylamine (TLV-TWA = 10 ppm), 20 ppm cyclohexanol (TLV-TWA = 50 ppm) and 10 ppm of propylene oxide (TLV-TWA = 20 ppm). What is the mixture TLV-TWA and has this level been exceeded?
17
Evaluation of exposure to dusts Dusts particle size range of 0.2-0.5 µm Particles > 0.5 µm unable to penetrate the
lungs Particle < 0.2 µm settle out too slowly, most
exhaled with the air Units: mg/m3 @ mg/mppcf
n
ii
i
n
ii
mix
TLVC
CTLV
1
1Equation 8
18
Example 3-5 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002) Determine the TLV for a uniform mixture of
dusts containing the following particles;
Solution:
Answer: 6.8 mppcf
Type of dust Concentration (wt.%)
TLV (mppcf)
Nonasbestiform 70 20
Quartz 30 2.7
19
Evaluation of exposure to Noise Noise levels are measured in decibels (dB) A dB is a relative logarithmic scale used to
compare the intensities of two sounds. If one sound is at intensity I and another sound is at intensity Io, then the difference in intensity levels in dB is given;
Noise intensity (dB) = - 10 log10(I/Io)
20
21
Example 3.6 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)Determine whether the following noise level is permissible with no additional control features:
Noise Level (dBa) Duration (hr) Max. allowed (hr)
85 3.6 No limit
95 3.0 4
110 0.5 0.5
22
Solution:
(TLV – TWA)mix, noise =
The sum > 1.0, workers are immediately required to wear ear protection. For long term plan, noise reduction control should be applied.
n
ii
i
TWATLV
C1 )(
75.15.0
5.0
4
3
limit no
6.3
)(1
n
ii
i
TWATLV
C
23
Evaluation of exposure to Toxic Vapors
Ventilation rate, Qv
(volume/time)Volatile rate out, kQvC
(mass/time)
Evolution rate of volatile, Qm
(mass/time)
Enclosure volume, V Volatile concentration, C(mass/volume)
6
v
gmppm 10
PMkQ
TRQC
Equation 9
24
Assumptions The calculated concentration is an average
concentration in the enclosure. Localized conditions could result in significantly higher concentrations; workers directly above an open container might be exposed to higher concentrations
A steady-state condition is assumed; that is, the accumulation term in the mass balance is 0
The non-ideal mixing factor, k varies from 0.1 – 0.5 for most practical situations. For perfect mixing, k = 1
25
Example 3.7 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)An open toluene container in an enclosure is weighed as a function of time, and it is determined that the average evaporation rate is 0.1 g/min. the ventilation rate is 100 ft3/min. the temperature is 80oF and the pressure is 1 atm. Estimate the concentration of toluene vapor in the enclosure, and compare your answer to the TLV for toluene of 50 ppm.
26
Solution Use equation 9 to solve the problem
From data given;
Qm 0.1 g/min
Rg 0.7302 ft3.atm/lb-mol.oR
T 80oF = 540oR
Qv 100 ft3/min
M 92 lbm/lb-mol
P 1 atm
k ?
Answer: kCppm = 9.43 ppm
K varies from 0.1 – 0.5, therefore Cppm may vary from 18.9 – 94.3 ppm. Actual vapor sampling is recommended to ensure that TLV is not exceeded
6
v
gmppm 10
PMkQ
TRQC
27
Estimating the vaporization rate of a liquid
Qm Qm
Volatile Substances
Open Vessel Chemical Spill
28
General expression for vaporization rate, Qm (mass/time):
M Molecular weight of volatile substance K mass transfer coefficient (length/time) for
an area A Rg ideal gas constant TL absolute temperature of the liquid
Lg
sat
m TR
pPMKAQ
)( Equation 10
29
For most cases, Psat >> p;
The equation is used to estimate the evaporation rate of volatile from an open vessel or a spill of liquid
Lg
sat
m TR
MKAPQ Equation 11
30
To estimate the concentration of volatile in enclosure resulting from evaporation of a liquid;
K gas mass transfer coefficient
610Lv
sat
ppm PTkQ
KATPC
610PkQ
KAPC
v
sat
ppm
Most events, T =
TL
Equation 12
Equation 13
Equa. 11 used in Equa .9
31
Estimation of K, gas mass transfer coefficient;
a constant D gas-phase diffusion coeeficient
3/2aDK Equation 14
32
To determine the ratio of the mass transfer coefficient between species K and a reference species Ko;
The gas-phase diffusion coefficients are estimated from the molecular weight, M of the species;
3/2
ooD
D
K
K
M
M
D
Do
o
Equation 15
Equation 16
33
Combined equation 15 & 16, simplified;
Kwater 0.83 cm/s
3/1
M
MKK o
oEquation 17
34
Example 3.8 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002) A large open tank with a 5-ft diameter
contains toluene. Estimate the evaporation rate from this tank assuming a temperature of 77oF and a pressure of 1 atm. If the ventilation rate is 3000 ft3/min, estimate the concentration of toluene in this workplace enclosure.
35
Evaluation of exposure during vessel filling operations For this case, volatile emissions are generated
from 2 sources: Evaporation of a liquid, (Qm)1
Displacement of the vapor in the vapor space by the liquid filling the vessel, (Qm)2
Therefore, the net generation of volatile;
(Qm) = (Qm)1 + (Qm)2
Equation 18
36
37
Vapor
Liquid
Volatile in
Vessel
Total Source = Evaporation + Displaced Air
Evaporation
rf constant filling rate of the vessel (time-1)
v density of the volatile vapor
Lg
sat
m TR
MKAPQ
1)(
vcfmVrQ
2)(
Equation 19
Equation 20
38
Hence, the net source term;
)()()(21
KAVrTR
MPQQQ
cf
Lg
sat
mmm
Equation 20
Equation 21
610)( KAVrPkQ
PC
cf
v
sat
ppm
39
Problem 3.24 (Crowl & Louvar, 2002)55-gallon drums are being filled with 2-butoxyethanol. The drums are being splash-filled at the rate of 30 drums per hour. The bung opening through which the drums are being filled has an area of 8 cm2. estimate the ambient vapor concentration if the ventilation rate is 3000 ft3/min. the vapor pressure for 2-butoxyethanol is 0.6 mm Hg under these conditions.
2-butoxyethanol chemical formula: HOCH2C2HOC4H9
40
Solution:
41
Appendix A
42
Appendix B Conversion of Fahrenheit (°F) to Rankine (°R)
1st stepConvert Fahrenheit to Celcius2nd stepConvert Celcius to Kelvin3rd stepConvert Kelvin to Rankine
43
8.1
32 F
C
TT
15.273CKTT
KRTT 8.1