INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, FACULTY OF … · 2019. 12. 13. · 7th international symposium...
Transcript of INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, FACULTY OF … · 2019. 12. 13. · 7th international symposium...
-
7th
INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL
ENGINEERING
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,
FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,
UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE, SERBIA
&
STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES,
STUTTGART, GERMANY
&
INNОVATION CENTER OF THE FACULTY OF
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,
UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE
Editors:
Vesna Spasojević-Brkić
Mirjana Misita
Dragan D. Milanović
27th
-28th
September 2018
Belgrade, Serbia
-
Editors Vesna Spasojević-Brkić Mirjana Misita Dragan D. Milanović 7th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING - SIE 2018, PROCEEDINGS Publisher Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade
Printing firm ''PLANETA PRINT'' d.o.o. Beograd
Published 2018 ISBN 978-86-7083-981-6 Sponzored by Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development
CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији - Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 005.22(082) 658.5(082) 006.83:338.45(082) INTERNATIONAL Symposium of Industrial Engineering (7th; 2018; Beograd) Proceedings / 7th International Symposium of Industrial Engineering - SIE 2018, 27th-28th September, 2018, Belgrade ; [organizers] Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade [and] Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies, Stuttgart, Germany [and] Innоvation Center of The Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade; editors Vesna Spasojević-Brkić, Mirjana Misita, Dragan D. Milanović. - Belgrade: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 2018 (Beograd: Planeta PRINT d.o.o.). - [9], 271 str. : ilustr. ; 30 cm Tekst štampan dvostubačno. - Tiraž 100. - Str. [4]: Preface / editors. - Bibliografija uz svaki rad. ISBN 978-86-7083-981-6 1. Spasojević-Brkić, Vesna [уредник] [аутор додатног текста], 1971- 2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (Beograd). Industrial Engineering Department a) Производња - Организација - Зборници b) Индустријски менаџмент - Зборници c) Индустрија - Систем квалитета - Зборници COBISS.SR-ID 217321228
-
Organizers of SIE 2018: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, FACULTY OF MECHANICAL
ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE, SERBIA & STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES, STUTTGART, GERMANY & INNОVATION CENTER OF THE FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY
OF BELGRADE
Program Advisory Committee
Chairperson: Spasojević-Brkić Vesna, FME,
Belgrade, SERBIA; Jovanović Aleksandar,
Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, GERMANY
• Babić Bojan, FME, UB (SRB) • Bragatto Paolo, INAIL (ITA) • Buchmeister Borut, University of Maribor (SLO) • Bugarić Uglješa, FME, UB (SRB) • Casadesus Marti, Universidad de Girona (ESP) • Csetverikov Dmitrij, Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
Institute for Computer Science and Control (HUN) • Cockalo Dragan, TF "Mihajlo Pupin", UNS (SRB) • Dondur Nikola, FME, UB (SRB) • Dźwiarek Marek, Central Institute for Labour
Protection – National Research Institute (POL) • Engh Erik, Web-Dev, Oslo (NOR) • Ferreira Pedro, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon &
FEES (PRT) • Filipović Jovan, FOS, UB (SRB); • Francalanza Emmanuel, FE, University of Malta
(MLT) • Gane Patrick, OY, Oftringen (CHE) • Karapetrovic Stanislav, University of Alberta (CAN) • Klarin Milivoj, TF "Mihajlo Pupin", UNS (SRB) • Kreiner Jesa, California State Universitiy, Fullerton
(USA) • Lalić Bojan, FTS, UNS (SRB) • Majstorović Vidosav, FME, UB (SRB) • Milanović D. Dragan, FME, UB (SRB) • Milazzo Francesca Maria, UM (ITA)
• Milosavljevic Pedja, FME, UN (SRB) • Mitrović Radivoje, FME, UB (SRB) • Minovski Robert, FME, Skoplje (MKD) • Misic Dimic Katarina, Aalto University (FIN) • Misita Mirjana, FME, UB (SRB) • Nunes Lopes Isabel, FCTUNL, Lisbon (PRT) • Petrović Dušan, FME, UB (SRB) • Popović Predrag, Institute Vinča (SRB) • Putnik Goran, Universidade de Minho (PRT) • Radenovic Stojan, FME, UB (SRB) • Radojević Slobodan, FME, UB (SRB) • Rakonjac Ivan, Serbian Innovation Fund (SRB) • Rožić Tomislav, FTTS, Zagreb (CRO) • Shuman Rutar Teodora, Seattle University (USA) • Sibalija Tatjana, MU, Belgrade (SRB) • Tadic Danijela, FEM, Kragujevac (SRB) • Tanović Ljubodrag, FME, UB (SRB) • Uzunovic-Zaimovic Nermina, FME, Zenica (BIH) • Valis David, UD (CZE) • Váncza József, MTA SZTAKI (HUN) • Veljković Zorica, FME, UB (SRB) • Mihajlović Ivan, TFB, Bor (SRB) • Zajac Mateusz, PW, Wroclaw (POL) • Živković Živan, TFB, Bor (SRB) • Žunjić Aleksandar, FME, UB (SRB) • Xiao-Guang Yue, IETI, Hong Kong (CHN) • Weiss John, University of Bradford, Bradford (UK)
Organizing Committee • Vesna Spasojevic-Brkic, PhD, Full Professor, FME, Belgrade, Serbia, Chairperson • Mirjana Misita, PhD, Full Professor, FME, Belgrade, Serbia • Sonja Josipović, PhD, FME, Belgrade, Assistant, Serbia • Tamara Golubović, PhD, FME, Belgrade, Assistant, Serbia
-
THE
A
Abstract. population modern trafto all its pato young cpedestrian differently world? Wenvironmensigns? Toexamines hyears of adifferent hindicated reaction tiChildren bmounted aimportanceappropriatKey words:Children. 1.INTRODIn modernwithout traimagine theThey did nlike as it issigns have Empire. Trguidelines,designed an
E IMPORTA
Aleksandar Tr
1 Faculty o2Facu
3F
Children rfrom the stan
affic poses comarticipants, anchildren. Child
injuries. Chfrom adults.
What helps tnt? How do
o address thehow fast the cage) react to heights. The that there wme for traffic best perceive at 1.9 m. The of ergonomicte height of traf: Ergonomic de
DUCTION n times, it’s affic signs, ande world beforenot always ex nowadays. In been in use si
raffic signs pro and warningnd placed to as
ANCE OF TRAF
rifunović1, Sv
of Transport aulty of MechaFaculty of Civ
represent a ndpoint of traf
mplex and high nd among themdren have a hhildren experHow do child
them to linkchildren im
ese questionschildren (betwe
traffic signsanalysis of
were differencsigns of diffea traffic sign
he research hc principles in ffic signs for ch
design, Traffic s
hard to imagd it’s even moe there was a nxist because tra
one form or anince the time o
ovide importantgs on the rossist drivers an
ERGONOMFFIC SIGN
etlana Čičevi
and Traffic Enanical Engineevil Engineerin
a.trifunov
vulnerable affic safety. A
requirements m, particularly higher risk of rience traffic dren view the k with their agine traffic
s, this study een 6 and 10 mounted at
f the results ces in mean ferent heights.n when it is
highlights the choosing the
hildren. signs,
gine a world re difficult to
need for them. affic was not nother, traffic of the Roman t information, ad; they are
nd pedestrians
MIC PRINNS FOR CH
ić1, Aleksanda
ngineering, Uering, Univer
[6]. Desunderstoin the saalso shoby drivindicatesigns is Ben-Basdifferenexplainedesign comply physicalstandardunderstoprinciplsignificaanswerspropose10, 11].importanall partiof the csigns differenobservesearch spite of these dithey archildren
NCIPLES INHILDREN
ar Zunjic2, M
niversity of Brsity of Belgray of Belgrade,rs
spite their impood correctly [ame way nor eown that signs
vers and pedese that the comp
very low, andssat and Shi
nces in compred by the signprinciples [3]with three b
l and dization, and faood than signs es [6]. Symboantly affected s and reaction ted various chan Besides, the snt role in the pcipants in traffcritical compoof highways
nces in the pd in a great va
and rf the great numifferences are re an indicaton's information
N DESIGN
Magdalena Dra
Belgrade, Serbade, Serbia , Serbia
portance, they[7] and they aequally fast. Ms are often wrstrians [1, 6].
prehension leved some are miinar (2006) rehension of s’ compliance . They found basic ergonom
conceptual amiliarity – arethat do not co
ols and colors both the cor
time [8, 4]. Mnges to the traspeed of the reperceptual jud
ffic situations aonents in the ds and streetprocessing spariety of tasks response smber of researc
still rarely reor of the neu
processing sys
OF THE
agović3
bia
y are not alwaare not perceivany studies harongly perceiv Some findinel of some traffiisinterpreted [6tested if thesigns could with ergonom
that signs thmic principles
compatibilite generally bettomply with the
on traffic sigrrectness of tany studies haaffic signs [2, esponse plays gments made b
and thus it is odesign of traffts. Age-relat
peed have beinvolving visu
selection. ches in this areeported althouural maturity stem.
ays ved ave ved ngs ffic 6]. ese be
mic hat
– ty, ter ese gns the ave
9, an by ne
ffic ted een ual In
ea, gh of
96
-
For the abexamine htraffic sign 2. METHO2.1. ParticiEducationaenvironmeneducation pexperiment29 (48.3%)this study, signs (TS)Traffic signand 2.2m (signs in tsimplicity, the manusupper TS, between 6-response bstimulus - terminated tested unde 2.2. Data AStatistical statistical s22. Normaof histograthe Kolmoresults do distributionand ANOVundertakenwere carrecommendManual" [5(α) is set at 3. RESULThe rest ochildren’s traffic signThe analysdifferencesdifferent hshowed the(0.259 s), tslowest reaThe seriesshow statisfor the low
bove reasons, tow children re
ns.
ODOLOGY ipants and Expal institutionsnts providingprograms weret. Of the total ) were femalessimple RTs to
) of differentns were placed(2.2m is lawfuthe populated these three TS
script be denorespectively. T-10 years) wer
button immediacertain trafficthe clock c
er all three diff
Analyses analysis wa
software packaality distributioms and the Ko
ogorov-Smirnonot significan
n, the decision VA. Dunnett’s n for additionrried out odations from th5]. The threshot 5%.
TS AND DISCof the paper p
reaction timens. sis of the resuls in mean reactheights (Figure shortest reactthen for the Laction time was of performestically signific
wer TS and RT
the aim of thieact to differe
periment Proces from rural g state-fundee chosen as venumber of 60
s and 31 maleo presented tat heights werd at 3 heights
ully defined heplace). For
S heights will, oted as lower,The subjects (cre instructed tately he/she rec sign, the resounter. All s
ferent condition
as performedage IBM SPSSon was tested bolmogorov-Smv test has det
ntly deviate frwas to use StuT3 Post Hoc
nal comparisonon the bashe textbook "Sold of statistica
CUSSION presents the res for differen
lts indicated thtion time for trre 1). Generation time for thower TS (0.26
as for the Upped paired Stud
cant differencefor the middle
is paper is to ent heights of
edure and urban
ed preschool enues for this 0 respondents, es (51.7%). In argets - traffic re measured. - 1.6m, 1.9m ight of traffic the sake of in the rest of
, middle and children aged o depress the ecognized the sponse button subjects were ns.
d using the S Statistics v. by inspection
mirnov test. As termined that om a normal udent’s T-test test has been ns. All tests sis of the SPSS Survival al significance
results of the nt heights of
hat there were raffic signs of ally, children he Middle TS 68), while the er TS (0.336). dent’s T-testss between RT
e TS (t=7.291;
p
-
differencesaccording tMiddle TS12.928; p react fasterthree heigh
Figure 3. Utimes for d 4. CONCLBased on research, so- Children mounted amiddle heifor Upper T- There differencesthe traffic s- Childrenchildren frothe traffic sTaking intobest perceim. Hence recommendsigns need by the ruleshould berecognitionparticipantsto incorposigns to ensFuture ressigns, as w
s for the to area: Lower (t = 8.187; p == 0.001). Chi
r than childrenhts of the traffic
Urban-rural diifferent height
LUSIONS the data colle
ome general coshowed the sh
at 1.9 m (0.25ght (0.268), anTS (0.336); are statistical
s in children’s signs;
n from the urbom the rural asigns. o account the ve a traffic sig
follows the dation that, at to be placed ats (2.2 m). Ergo
e involved tn and furths. It can be co
orate ergonomsure driver andearch should
well as more age
children’s rer TS (t = 9.762= 0.006) and Uildren from th
n from the rurac signal.
ifferences in ms of traffic sign
ected and anaonclusions can hortest reaction59 s), then fond the slowest
lly significantRT for all thr
ban area reacarea, for all thr
above mentiogn when it is m
conclusion aleast in schoolt lower heightsonomic principto improve her behavior oncluded that itics in the de
d road safety. include all ty
e groups of res
eaction time2; p = 0.003), Upper TS (t = he urban area al area, for all
mean reaction ns.
alyzed in thisbe derived:
n time for TS or TS at the t reaction was
t age-related ree heights of
ct faster than ree heights of
oned, children mounted at 1.9 and practical l areas, traffic s than defined ples of design traffic signs
of traffic t is important
esign of road
ypes of road spondents.
AcknowThis stEducatioof Serbi REFER[1]Role oundersta& preven[2]streets tothe effdevelopmTranspor[3]Ergonomsign com[4]Interactilabels: dcomplian[5]McGraw[6]Comprehtext disppsycholo[7]Comprehtext disppsycholo[8]&Zakowcompreh46(15), 1[9](2017). children56-64. [10]Mitrović(touchsceducatiosymbolsErgonom[11]B. (2017knowledAcciden[12]developmevaluatioApplied
wledgements tudy was supon, Science ania (projects 360
RENCES Al-Madani, H
of drivers’ anding traffic sntion, 34(2), 18
Appleyard, B.o schoolchildrefects of trafment of spart & Health, 5,
Ben-Bassat, mic guidelines mprehension. Hu
Braun, C. Cion of signal differences in pence. Ergonomic
Pallant, J. (2w-Hill Education
Shinar, D., hension of trafplays. Transpoogy and behavio
Shinar, D., hension of trafplays. Transpoogy and behavio
Shinar, D., wska, L. (20hension: a cro1549-1565.
Siu, K. W. MChildren's ch
's safety sign d
Trifunović, Ać, S., Dragovićcreen devices) on: testing spatis on traffic mics and Safety
Trifunović, A7). The import
dge of traffic sint Analysis & Pr
Waterson, Pment of guidon of warninergonomics, 45
pported by Tnd Technologic027, 36022 and
H., & Al-Janahpersonal ch
sign symbols. A85-196. . (2017). The men: An image mffic on childatial knowledg27-41. T., & Shinfor traffic signuman factors, 4
C., & Silver, word and colerceived hazardcs, 38(11), 22072013). SPSS n (UK).
&Vogelzangffic signs with ortation researcour, 18, 72-82.
&Vogelzangffic signs with ortation researcour, 18, 72-82. Dewar, R. E.003). Traffic
oss-cultural stu
M., Lam, M. S.,hoice: Color
design. Applied
A., Čičević, S., M. (2018). Cand PCs in prial relationshipsigns. IETI
y, 2, 35-41. ., Pešić, D., Čičtance of spatiaigns for childrerevention, 102,
P., & Monk, delines for t
ng signs for 5(5), 1353-1361
The Ministry cal Developmed 36006).
hi, A. R. (2002haracteristics Accident analy
meaning of livabmapping study dren's cognitige. Journal
nar, D. (2006n design increa48(1), 182-195.
N. C. (1995lour on warnid and behaviour7-2220. survival manu
g, M. (2013symbolic vers
ch part F: traf
g, M. (2013symbolic vers
ch part F: traf
., Summala, H sign symb
udy. Ergonomic
, & Wong, Y. associations
d ergonomics, 5
., Lazarević, DComparing tablereschool childrep using geometrTransactions
čević, S., &Antal orientation aen's traffic safe81-92. A. (2014). T
the design ayoung childre
1.
of ent
2). in
sis
ble of
ive of
6). ase
5). ing ral
ual.
3). sus ffic
3). sus ffic
H., bol cs,
L. in
59,
D., ets en' ric on
tić, and ty.
The and en.
98