Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention
description
Transcript of Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention
![Page 1: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of
auditory attention
B.V. Chernyshev*, D.M. Ramendik, I.E. Lazarev,E.S. Osokina, N.A. Novikov
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Laboratory of cognitive psychophysiology
Moscow, Russia
The study was implemented in the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics in 2011-2014.
![Page 2: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is temperament?
Temperament is a set of genetically determined and stable biological characteristics that shape various aspects of behavior and mental processes [Eysenck, 1970; Gray, 1991; Costa, &
McCrae, 1995; Rusalov, 2002; Strelau et al., 2005] – thus leading to characteristic coping strategies.
![Page 3: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is attention?
Attention is a mechanism to single out important signals from the immense torrent of stimuli coming from the environment, analyze them and timely respond to them.
![Page 4: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is attention?
Attention is a mechanism to single out important signals from the immense torrent of stimuli coming from the environment, analyze them and timely respond to them.
Attentional tasks involving active responses create moderately high cognitive load, require effort and thus require participants to choose strategies likely dependent upon temperament. This makes attentional tasks relevant in the search of psychophysiological markers of temperament.
![Page 5: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Some relevant finding on relations between temperamentand ERPs to auditory stimuli
in attentional tasks
♦ The N1 and N1-P2 amplitude are higher in introverts compared to extraverts [Stelmack, Achorn, & Michaud, 1977; Doucet, & Stelmack, 2000].
♦ The N1 peak and N1-P2 amplitude are related to Sensation Seeking and Neuroticism [Doucet, & Stelmack, 2000; Hegerl, Gallinat, & Mrowinski, 1995; Philipova, 2008].
♦ N2 amplitude is positively correlated with Anxiety [Righi, Mecacci, & Viggiano, 2009].
♦ P3 amplitude is negatively correlated with Neuroticism [Gurrera et al.,
2005], although other authors found no difference [Fjell, Walhovd, Meling, & Johansen, 2005].
![Page 6: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
♦ Some studies reported that higher Extraversion corresponds to higher P3 amplitude [Gurrera, Salisbury, O’Donnell, Nestor, & McCarley, 2005; Philipova, 2008; Gurrera, O’Donnell, Nestor, Gainski, & McCarley, 2001; Fishman, Ng, & Bellugi, 2011;
Cahill, & Polich, 1992], whereas other studies reported the opposite [Daruna, Karrer, & Rosen, 1985; Tatalović Vorkapić, 2009; Beauducel, Brocke, & Leue, 2006;
Hansenne, 2000; Wilson, & Languis, 1990] or failed to find any influence of Extraversion on P3 amplitude [Camposano, Alvarez, & Lolas, 1994].
♦ P3 amplitude habituates faster in extraverts, thus making the amplitude dependent on the duration of the experiment [Ditraglia, & Polich 1991].
Some relevant finding on relations between temperamentand ERPs to auditory stimuli
in attentional tasks
![Page 7: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hot questions
![Page 8: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
♦ How many temperament dimensions actually exist?
Hot questions
![Page 9: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
♦ How many temperament dimensions actually exist?
♦ Altogether more than 80 temperament dimensions were proposed.
Hot questions
![Page 10: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
♦ How many temperament dimensions actually exist?
♦ Altogether more than 80 temperament dimensions were proposed.
♦ Questionnaires may probe 2 to 16 dimensions at a time.
Hot questions
![Page 11: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
♦ How many temperament dimensions actually exist?
♦ Altogether more than 80 temperament dimensions were proposed.
♦ Questionnaires may probe 2 to 16 dimensions at a time.
♦ Can it be that we still do not know the “true” temperament dimensions, and we actually use projections of this multidimensional space onto more or less arbitrary axes?
Hot questions
![Page 12: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
♦ How many temperament dimensions actually exist?
♦ Altogether more than 80 temperament dimensions were proposed.
♦ Questionnaires may probe 2 to 16 dimensions at a time.
♦ Can it be that we still do not know the “true” temperament dimensions, and we actually use projections of this multidimensional space onto more or less arbitrary axes?
♦ Can it be that the number of temperament dimensions is much grater than currently known?
Hot questions
![Page 13: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Hot questions
![Page 14: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
♦ Currently many temperament dimension were traced to particular genes coding particular proteins involved in neuromodulatory systems: serotonin - anxiety, dopamine – sensation-seeking and extraversion, etc. [reviewed in Ebstein, 2006; Munafò, Flint, 2011]
Hot questions
![Page 15: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
♦ Currently many temperament dimension were traced to particular genes coding particular proteins involved in neuromodulatory systems: serotonin - anxiety, dopamine – sensation-seeking and extraversion, etc. [reviewed in Ebstein, 2006; Munafò, Flint, 2011]
♦ Taking into account, that there are at least hundreds of proteins involved in neuromodulator synthesis, transportation, release, detection by receptors, reuptake and breakdown, there potentially might be hundreds of temperament dimensions in such physiological/biochemical aspect [Munafò, Flint, 2011].
Hot questions
![Page 16: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
♦ Currently many temperament dimension were traced to particular genes coding particular proteins involved in neuromodulatory systems: serotonin - anxiety, dopamine – sensation-seeking and extraversion, etc. [reviewed in Ebstein, 2006; Munafò, Flint, 2011]
♦ Taking into account, that there are at least hundreds of proteins involved in neuromodulator synthesis, transportation, release, detection by receptors, reuptake and breakdown, there potentially might be hundreds of temperament dimensions in such physiological/biochemical aspect [Munafò, Flint, 2011].
♦ Important analogy: In psychophysical studying of olfaction,5 to 12 basic smells were proposed by various authors….Genetical methods revealed about 1000 [Buck, Axel, 1991].
Hot questions
![Page 17: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Hot questions
![Page 18: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
♦ Phenotype may significantly override genetical predispositions, resulting in less variation, because individuals develop certain coping strategies and expectations, and there are not so many general strategies that can be used in real life.
Hot questions
![Page 19: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
♦ Phenotype may significantly override genetical predispositions, resulting in less variation, because individuals develop certain coping strategies and expectations, and there are not so many general strategies that can be used in real life.
♦ Self-regulation related to attentional networks was proposed [Posner, Rothbart, 1998, 2000].
Hot questions
![Page 20: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
♦ Phenotype may significantly override genetical predispositions, resulting in less variation, because individuals develop certain coping strategies and expectations, and there are not so many general strategies that can be used in real life.
♦ Self-regulation related to attentional networks was proposed [Posner, Rothbart, 1998, 2000].
♦ Can it be that temperament dimensions form clusters of related dimensions as a result of trial-and-error learning to use specific coping strategies? This would allow using small numbers of dimensions in description of temperament.
Hot questions
![Page 21: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
♦ Phenotype may significantly override genetical predispositions, resulting in less variation, because individuals develop certain coping strategies and expectations, and there are not so many general strategies that can be used in real life.
♦ Self-regulation related to attentional networks was proposed [Posner, Rothbart, 1998, 2000].
♦ Can it be that temperament dimensions form clusters of related dimensions as a result of trial-and-error learning to use specific coping strategies? This would allow using small numbers of dimensions in description of temperament.
♦ Naturally occurring clustering would invoke strong correlations between certain dimensions. For example, extraversion is known to have strong positive correlations with the Strength Excitation and Mobility in the Pavlovian theory of temperament [Strelau et al., 2005].
Hot questions
![Page 22: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Discordant patterns of temperament
![Page 23: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
♦ Can it be that some individuals fail to form such coherent patterns of strategies, expectations and self-awareness through experience?
Discordant patterns of temperament
![Page 24: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
♦ Can it be that some individuals fail to form such coherent patterns of strategies, expectations and self-awareness through experience?
♦ Dina M. Ramendik, member of our research group, proposed that a subpopulation of people with discordant patterns of temperament dimensions may be detected in the following way [Ramendik, 2008; Chernyshev et al., 2010; Ramendik, 2011]:
Discordant patterns of temperament
![Page 25: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
♦ Can it be that some individuals fail to form such coherent patterns of strategies, expectations and self-awareness through experience?
♦ Dina M. Ramendik, member of our research group, proposed that a subpopulation of people with discordant patterns of temperament dimensions may be detected in the following way [Ramendik, 2008; Chernyshev et al., 2010; Ramendik, 2011]:- several questionnaires need to be used simultaneously
Discordant patterns of temperament
![Page 26: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
♦ Can it be that some individuals fail to form such coherent patterns of strategies, expectations and self-awareness through experience?
♦ Dina M. Ramendik, member of our research group, proposed that a subpopulation of people with discordant patterns of temperament dimensions may be detected in the following way [Ramendik, 2008; Chernyshev et al., 2010; Ramendik, 2011]:- several questionnaires need to be used simultaneously - questionnaires should be based on significantly different theoretical grounds, but at least some dimensions should be strongly correlated between questionnaires.
Discordant patterns of temperament
![Page 27: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
♦ Can it be that some individuals fail to form such coherent patterns of strategies, expectations and self-awareness through experience?
♦ Dina M. Ramendik, member of our research group, proposed that a subpopulation of people with discordant patterns of temperament dimensions may be detected in the following way [Ramendik, 2008; Chernyshev et al., 2010; Ramendik, 2011]:- several questionnaires need to be used simultaneously - questionnaires should be based on significantly different theoretical grounds, but at least some dimensions should be strongly correlated between questionnaires.- minor differences in questionnaires may produce reversal of correlational patterns within some individuals, thus uncovering the discordant pattern of temperamental traits in them.
Discordant patterns of temperament
![Page 28: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The causes of discordance may presumably include the following:
![Page 29: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The causes of discordance may presumably include the following:
- Strong environmental pressure making people use coping strategies contradicting those they would naturally develop in free trial-and-error conditions. For example, very oppressive traditional or religious families me make an extraverted person behave and feel introverted.
![Page 30: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The causes of discordance may presumably include the following:
- Strong environmental pressure making people use coping strategies contradicting those they would naturally develop in free trial-and-error conditions. For example, very oppressive traditional or religious families me make an extraverted person behave and feel introverted.
- Inborn high reactivity may lead to anxiety. In most people this anxiety dissipates with time, but it prevents normal communication with pears and causes some kind of learned helplessness in sociability. Thus the questionnaires may falsely detect such people as introverts, while other dimensions would show that the person might actually be a hidden extravert.
![Page 31: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
♦ Longitudinal study has shown that discordant individuals are much less successful in education and carrier, and this factor is more important than IQ and a number of other intellect and attention measures [Ramendik, 2011; Ramendik, Chernyshev,
Chernysheva, 2014].
Ramendik, Chernyshev, Chernysheva, 2014. Voprosy psihologii, 2014, 3, 105-117
![Page 32: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Pavlovian Temperament Survey (PTS) [Strelau, 1999]:
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 33: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The Pavlovian Temperament Survey (PTS) [Strelau, 1999]:
Intensity dimensions:- Strength of Excitation (the ability to endure arousing environmental influences; α = .82), - Strength of Inhibition (the ability to endure inhibiting environmental influences; α = .84),
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 34: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Pavlovian Temperament Survey (PTS) [Strelau, 1999]:
Intensity dimensions:- Strength of Excitation (the ability to endure arousing environmental influences; α = .82), - Strength of Inhibition (the ability to endure inhibiting environmental influences; α = .84),
Temporal dimension:- Mobility of Nervous Processes (the speed of alteration of excitation and inhibition processes; α = .81).
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 35: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ) [Rusalov, 1990, 2002].
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 36: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ) [Rusalov, 1990, 2002].
Intensity dimensions:- Object-related Ergonicity (the disposition to perform mental and physical work; α = .83), - Social Ergonicity (the disposition to be involved in social activity; α = .76),
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 37: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ) [Rusalov, 1990, 2002].
Intensity dimensions:- Object-related Ergonicity (the disposition to perform mental and physical work; α = .83), - Social Ergonicity (the disposition to be involved in social activity; α = .76),
Temporal dimensions:- Object-related Plasticity (the ease of switching from one object-related activity to another; α = .77), - Social Plasticity (the ease of entering in social contacts and the diversity of communicative programs; α = .72), - Object-related Tempo (the speed of mental operations and motor acts in the process of object-related activity; α = .80), - Social Tempo (the speed of mental operations and motor acts in the process of communication; α = .73),
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 38: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The Structure of Temperament Questionnaire (STQ) [Rusalov, 1990, 2002].
Intensity dimensions:- Object-related Ergonicity (the disposition to perform mental and physical work; α = .83), - Social Ergonicity (the disposition to be involved in social activity; α = .76),
Temporal dimensions:- Object-related Plasticity (the ease of switching from one object-related activity to another; α = .77), - Social Plasticity (the ease of entering in social contacts and the diversity of communicative programs; α = .72), - Object-related Tempo (the speed of mental operations and motor acts in the process of object-related activity; α = .80), - Social Tempo (the speed of mental operations and motor acts in the process of communication; α = .73),
Emotionality dimensions:- Object-related Emotionality (the emotional sensitivity to discrepancies between anticipated and real results of object-related activity; α = .84), - Social Emotionality (the emotional sensitivity to failures in communication; α = .71).
Pavlovian approach to temperament
![Page 39: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Study 1
Aims:
- To find psychophysiological evidence that Extraversion is not a unitary dimension
- To find psychophysiological markers distinguishing individuals with the discordant structure of temperament
Chernyshev, Lazarev, Chernysheva, 2013. Psychology & Neuroscience, V.6, No 3, p. 235-245
Ramendik, Chernyshev, Chernysheva, 2014. Voprosy psihologii, 2014, 3, 105-117
![Page 40: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Questionnaires:
- EPI (Eysenck Personality Inventory) [Eysenck, 1982; Shmelyov, 2002]
- PTS (Pavlovian Temperament Survey) [Strelau, 1999]
- STQ (Structure of Temperament Questionnaire) [Rusalov, 1990, 2002]
![Page 41: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Modification of the oddball paradigm (Sutton et al., 1965)
S2, S2, S1, S2, S2, S2, S2, S1, S2, S2, S2, S1, S2, S1, S2…
![Page 42: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Modification of the oddball paradigm (Sutton et al., 1965)
S2, S2, S1, S2, S2, S2, S2, S1, S2, S2, S2, S1, S2, S1, S2…
Deviants 1050 Hz, standards 1000 Hz, 40 ms (including 10 ms rise and fall), 85 dB, probability 1:4, ISI 2,500 ± 500 ms
15 pericentral electrodes (F3, Fz, F4, Fc3, Fcz, Fc4, C3, Cz, C4, Cp3, Cpz, Cp4, P3, Pz, P4).
Statistics: general linear model, and Spearman correlation. For statistical validization bootstrapping and jackknifing procedures were used.
![Page 43: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Grand-averaged ERPs (N=30)
-200 0 200 400 600
-10
-5
0
5
10
Time, ms
Pot
enti
al, μ
V
P2
N1
N2
P3
![Page 44: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Extraversion
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
N1-P2 amplitude (uV)
Time, ms -200 0 200 400 600
-10
-5 0 5
10
high Extraversion low Extraversion
Pot
enti
al, μ
V
The higher Extraversion, the smaller N1-P2 amplitude(F(1,28)=8.80, p=.006, R=-053, p=.003).
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Ам
плит
уда
N1
-P2,
мкВ
Extraversion
N1-
P2
ampl
itud
e (u
V)
This finding is in line with several reports [Stelmack, Achorn, & Michaud, 1977; Doucet, & Stelmack, 2000].
![Page 45: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95Mobility of nervous processes
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
N1-P2 amplitude (uV)
-200 0 200 400 600
-10
-5
0
5
10
Pot
enti
al, μ
V
high Mobility of nervous processes low Mobility of nervous processes
The higher Mobility, the smaller N1-P2 amplitude(F(1,28)=8.50, p=.007, R=-.44, p=.02).
Time, ms
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Подвижность нервных процессов
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Ам
пли
туда
N1-
P2, м
кВ
Mobility of nervous processes
N1-
P2
ampl
itud
e (u
V)
![Page 46: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95Mobility of nervous processes
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
N1 amplitude (uV)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Extraversion
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
N1 amplitude (uV)
Extraversion and Mobility of nervous process was also similarly related to N1 amplitude
(F(1,28)=4.96, p=.03, R=.46, p=.01) and (F(1,28)=6.50, p=.02, R=.37, p=.04)
Экстраверсия
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Экстраверсия
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Extraversion
N1
ampl
itud
e (u
V)
Подвижность нервных процессов
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Подвижность нервных процессов
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Mobility of nervous processes
N1
ampl
itud
e (u
V)
![Page 47: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95Mobility of nervous processes
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
N1 amplitude (uV)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Extraversion
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
N1 amplitude (uV)
Extraversion and Mobility of nervous process was also similarly related to N1 amplitude
(F(1,28)=4.96, p=.03, R=.46, p=.01) and (F(1,28)=6.50, p=.02, R=.37, p=.04)
Экстраверсия
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Экстраверсия
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Extraversion
N1
ampl
itud
e (u
V)
Подвижность нервных процессов
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Подвижность нервных процессов
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ам
плит
уда
N1,
мкВ
Mobility of nervous processes
N1
ampl
itud
e (u
V)
Thus, the higher Extraversion and Mobility,the less N1 and N1-P2 amplitude
![Page 48: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The higher Extraversion, the shorter latency of N2(F(1,28)=6.93, p=.01, R=-.46, p=.01)
Time, ms -200 0 200 400 600
-10
-5 0 5
10
high Extraversion low Extraversion
Pot
enti
al, μ
V
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Extraversion
150
200
250
300
350
N2 latecy (ms)
Экстраверсия
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 150
200
250
300
350
Лат
ентн
ый
пери
од N
2, м
с
Extraversion
N2
late
ncy
(ms)
![Page 49: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Social-related ergonicity
150
200
250
300
350
N2 latecy (ms)
The higher Social Ergonicity, the shorter latency of N2(F(1,28)=12.40, p=.001, R=-.55, p=.001)
-200
Pot
enti
al, μ
V
Time, ms 0 200 400 600
-10
-5
0
5
10
high social-related ergonicity low social-related ergonicity
Социальная эргичность
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 150
200
250
300
350
Лат
ентн
ый
пери
од N
2, м
с
Social-related ergonicity
N2
late
ncy
(ms)
Thus, the higher
Extraversion and Social Ergonicitythe shorter latency of N2
![Page 50: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Interim summary 1
![Page 51: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Interim summary 1
♦ We found that Extraversion was related to different ERP parameters, each time in complex with another dimension. Together with Mobility of Nervous Processes, Extraversion was related to the amplitude of the N1-P2 complex. Together with Social Ergonicity, Extraversion was related to N2 latency.
![Page 52: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Interim summary 1
♦ We found that Extraversion was related to different ERP parameters, each time in complex with another dimension. Together with Mobility of Nervous Processes, Extraversion was related to the amplitude of the N1-P2 complex. Together with Social Ergonicity, Extraversion was related to N2 latency.
♦ Thus, Extraversion manifests itself in two different ways – both as a temporal dimension and as an intensity dimension of temperament. This finding is in line with the data showing that Extraversion combines both intensity and temporal aspects of temperament [Strelau et al., 2005; Ilyin, 2004; Golubeva, 2005; Beauducel et al., 2006].
![Page 53: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Interim summary 1
♦ We found that Extraversion was related to different ERP parameters, each time in complex with another dimension. Together with Mobility of Nervous Processes, Extraversion was related to the amplitude of the N1-P2 complex. Together with Social Ergonicity, Extraversion was related to N2 latency.
♦ Thus, Extraversion manifests itself in two different ways – both as a temporal dimension and as an intensity dimension of temperament. This finding is in line with the data showing that Extraversion combines both intensity and temporal aspects of temperament [Strelau et al., 2005; Ilyin, 2004; Golubeva, 2005; Beauducel et al., 2006].
♦ Temporal aspect: Supposedly smaller amplitude of N1-P2 и N1 reflects less resources involved in preattentional stages of perception, thus allowing to divide resources between greater number of potential targets of attention. This makes attentional system more effective in finding targets and switching to them – leading to higher Extraversion and higher Mobility
![Page 54: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Interim summary 1
♦ We found that Extraversion was related to different ERP parameters, each time in complex with another dimension. Together with Mobility of Nervous Processes, Extraversion was related to the amplitude of the N1-P2 complex. Together with Social Ergonicity, Extraversion was related to N2 latency.
♦ Thus, Extraversion manifests itself in two different ways – both as a temporal dimension and as an intensity dimension of temperament. This finding is in line with the data showing that Extraversion combines both intensity and temporal aspects of temperament [Strelau et al., 2005; Ilyin, 2004; Golubeva, 2005; Beauducel et al., 2006].
♦ Temporal aspect: Supposedly smaller amplitude of N1-P2 и N1 reflects less resources involved in preattentional stages of perception, thus allowing to divide resources between greater number of potential targets of attention. This makes attentional system more effective in finding targets and switching to them – leading to higher Extraversion and higher Mobility
♦ Intensity aspect: faster N2 may mean faster involvement of cognitive control [Folstein, Van, 2008; Steinhauser, Eichele et al., 2012], leading again to higher Extraversion and higher Ergonicity.
![Page 55: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Measurement of concordance
The participants were divided into two groups: “concordant” and “discordant” depending upon the compatibility of temperament profiles for the three questionnaires [Ramendik, 2008; 2011].
![Page 56: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Measurement of concordance
The participants were divided into two groups: “concordant” and “discordant” depending upon the compatibility of temperament profiles for the three questionnaires [Ramendik, 2008; 2011].
For the analysis mean values (М) of a dimension and its dispersion (δ) were taken from the original validation papers [Eysenck, Eysenck, 1985;
Rusalov, 1990; Strelau et al., 1999].
Experimentally measured values were thus classified as low (less then М-δ), medium (within М±δ), and high (greater then М+δ). Within the known correlational ties reported by questionnaire authors, the results for each participant were evaluated pairwise as compatible (same or near correspondence) or incompatible (opposite groups).For “concordant” participants all measures were in agreement with known correlations, for discordant participants at least one measure contradicted known correlations.
![Page 57: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
In concordant group (N=16) amplitude of N2-P3 higher,then in discordant group (N=14)
(F(1,28)=11.79, p=.002)
"c oncordant" "d iscordant"0
2
4
6
8
10
12
N2-
P3 A
mlit
ude
(μA
)
-200 0 200 400 600
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Fcz
Time, ms
Pot
enti
al, μ
V
“discordant" “concordant"
![Page 58: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Interim summary 2
![Page 59: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Interim summary 2
♦ We found that concordant and discordant groups manifested ERP difference that can not be explained through any single dimension, and thus the distinction of concordant/discordant structures of temperament is a separate phenomenon.
![Page 60: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Interim summary 2
♦ We found that concordant and discordant groups manifested ERP difference that can not be explained through any single dimension, and thus the distinction of concordant/discordant structures of temperament is a separate phenomenon.
♦ Lower N2-P3 amplitude may mean poorer cognitive control and/or attention in discordant individuals.
![Page 61: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Study 2
Aims:
- To find the psychophysiological precursors of spontaneous attention errors
- To find psychophysiological markers distinguishing individuals with the discordant structure of temperament
Partially data on errors published in: Lazarev, Bryzgalov, Osokina, Vyazovtseva, Antonenko, Arkhipova, Chernyshev. Zhurnal Vyss Nervn Deyatelnosti, 64, 3, 292-303.
![Page 62: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Questionnaires:
- EPI (Eysenck Personality Inventory) [Eysenck, 1982; Shmelyov, 2002]
- PTS (Pavlovian Temperament Survey) [Strelau, 1999]
- NEO-FFI [Costa, McCrae, 1995; Orel, Senin, 2008].
![Page 63: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Questionnaires:
- EPI (Eysenck Personality Inventory) [Eysenck, 1982; Shmelyov, 2002]
- PTS (Pavlovian Temperament Survey) [Strelau, 1999]
- NEO-FFI [Costa, McCrae, 1995; Orel, Senin, 2008].
Groups: Concordant (N=44), Discordant (N=7)
![Page 64: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Correlation matrix between personality dimensions (N=70). In color are shown significant correlations (p<.001):
blue – negative, pink - positive
EP
I Ext
rave
rsio
n
EP
I Neu
roti
cism
PT
S E
xcit
atio
n
PT
S Im
hib
itio
n
PT
S M
ob
ility
NE
O N
euro
tici
sm
NE
O E
xtra
vers
ion
NE
O O
pen
nes
NE
O A
gre
eab
len
ess
NE
O C
on
scie
nti
ou
snes
s
EPI Extraversion 1.00 -0.25 0.55 -0.23 0.68 -0.37 0.76 0.04 -0.35 0.02
EPI Neuroticism -0.25 1.00 -0.53 -0.36 -0.41 0.74 -0.34 0.02 -0.15 -0.26
PTS Excitation 0.55 -0.53 1.00 0.22 0.67 -0.59 0.51 -0.03 -0.17 0.26
PTS Imhibition -0.23 -0.36 0.22 1.00 -0.06 -0.38 -0.06 -0.03 0.40 0.25
PTS Mobility 0.68 -0.41 0.67 -0.06 1.00 -0.49 0.54 0.06 -0.12 0.23
NEO Neuroticism -0.37 0.74 -0.59 -0.38 -0.49 1.00 -0.45 0.12 -0.09 -0.23
NEO Extraversion 0.76 -0.34 0.51 -0.06 0.54 -0.45 1.00 0.06 -0.12 0.14
NEO Opennes 0.04 0.02 -0.03 -0.03 0.06 0.12 0.06 1.00 -0.13 -0.12
NEO Agreeableness -0.35 -0.15 -0.17 0.40 -0.12 -0.09 -0.12 -0.13 1.00 0.04
NEO Conscientiousness 0.02 -0.26 0.26 0.25 0.23 -0.23 0.14 -0.12 0.04 1.00
![Page 65: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Modification of a condensation task (Posner, 1964)
Pure Noised
High Left button Right button
Low Right button Left button
Four auditory stimuli, each characterized with two features (pitch and noisiness), and the following response contingencies in the experimental task:
![Page 66: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Modification of a condensation task (Posner, 1964)
HP, LP, LN, HN, LP, HP, HN, LP, LN, HP…
Pure Noised
High Left button Right button
Low Right button Left button
Four auditory stimuli, each characterized with two features (pitch and noisiness), and the following response contingencies in the experimental task:
![Page 67: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Modification of a condensation task (Posner, 1964)
HP, LP, LN, HN, LP, HP, HN, LP, LN, HP…
Pure Noised
High Left button Right button
Low Right button Left button
Four auditory stimuli, each characterized with two features (pitch and noisiness), and the following response contingencies in the experimental task:
Low 500 Hz, high 2000 Hz, 40 ms (including 10 ms rise and fall), 95 dB,probability 1:1:1:1, ISI 2,500 ± 500 ms
![Page 68: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Difference map (correct-error)
P2 is greater for errors compared to correct responses
(N = 52, F(1, 51) = 24.516, p < .0001)
![Page 69: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
♦ We found that errors are preceded by increased P2 amplitude.
♦ This may be the consequence of the primary task loosing competition for attentional resources to some covert activity.
Interim summary 3
![Page 70: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Discordant participants committed more errors than concordant ones
F(1, 73)=4.2382, p=.04
concordant discordant89
101112131415161718
Per
cent
age
of e
rror
s
![Page 71: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
If concordance is not accounted in the analysis, N1 amplitude does not differ between errors and correct responses(F(1, 51)=2.901, p=.09).
![Page 72: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
If concordance is not accounted in the analysis, N1 amplitude does not differ between errors and correct responses(F(1, 51)=2.901, p=.09).
When concordance is included into the analysis, significant are- N1 amplitude (F(1, 49)=9.076, p=.004)
- interaction N1 amplitude x concordance (F(1, 49)=6.477, p=.014)
concordant discordant
errors correct-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
N1
ampl
tude
(μ
V)
![Page 73: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
If concordance is not accounted in the analysis, P2 latency does not differ between errors and correct responses(F(1, 51)=0.0128, p=.9).
![Page 74: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
If concordance is not accounted in the analysis, P2 latency does not differ between errors and correct responses(F(1, 51)=0.0128, p=.9).
When concordance is included into the analysis, significant is interaction P2 latency x concordance(F(1, 49)=5.553, p=.02)
concordant discordant
errors correct165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
P2
late
ncy
(ms)
![Page 75: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Interim summary 4
![Page 76: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Interim summary 4
♦ Again, discordant group proved to be distinguishable from the concordant group.
![Page 77: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Interim summary 4
♦ Again, discordant group proved to be distinguishable from the concordant group.
♦ Apparently, discordant individuals achieve correct responses by investing more effort/resources. Still they can not constantly keep this high level of effort, and by occasionally loosing this level of effort they commit errors.
![Page 78: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Interim summary 4
♦ Again, discordant group proved to be distinguishable from the concordant group.
♦ Apparently, discordant individuals achieve correct responses by investing more effort/resources. Still they can not constantly keep this high level of effort, and by occasionally loosing this level of effort they commit errors.
♦ Concordant individuals invest less effort/resources, with no such evident signs of recoil.
![Page 79: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Conclusions
![Page 80: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Conclusions♦ Current findings point to the importance of using a multidimensional approach in the psychophysiological studies of temperament
![Page 81: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Conclusions♦ Current findings point to the importance of using a multidimensional approach in the psychophysiological studies of temperament
♦ Dimensions known as “unitary” may in fact be spitted into several physiologically valid dimensions
![Page 82: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Conclusions♦ Current findings point to the importance of using a multidimensional approach in the psychophysiological studies of temperament
♦ Dimensions known as “unitary” may in fact be spitted into several physiologically valid dimensions
♦ The number of true temperament dimensions is not known, and it is reasonable to expect very high numbers of them
![Page 83: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Conclusions♦ Current findings point to the importance of using a multidimensional approach in the psychophysiological studies of temperament
♦ Dimensions known as “unitary” may in fact be spitted into several physiologically valid dimensions
♦ The number of true temperament dimensions is not known, and it is reasonable to expect very high numbers
♦ Most people adapt through individual trial-and-error learning, and adhere to a limited number of coping strategies – thus making it realistic to approximate temperament of most people with a small number of dimensions
![Page 84: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Conclusions♦ Current findings point to the importance of using a multidimensional approach in the psychophysiological studies of temperament
♦ Dimensions known as “unitary” may in fact be spitted into several physiologically valid dimensions
♦ The number of true temperament dimensions is not known, and it is reasonable to expect very high numbers
♦ Most people adapt through individual trial-and-error learning, and adhere to a limited number of coping strategies – thus making it realistic to approximate temperament of most people with a small number of dimensions
♦ A fraction of the population individual learning partly fails due to external or internal factors. Such individuals have untypical relations within multidimensional temperament space, making them different from the rest of the population (usually with negative effects on academic and professional success even if they possess high cognitive abilities).
![Page 85: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Research team
Dina M. Ramendik Ivan E. Lazarev Evgenia S. Osokina Nikita A. Novikov
Dmitri V. Bryzgalov Anastasia S. Antonenko Elena A. Arkhipova Galiya R. Khusyainova
![Page 86: Individual differences in electrophysiological correlates of auditory attention](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070404/56813ac6550346895da2db58/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Thank you for your attention!